@@arshdeepbedi6379 if they have high load factor, then wouldn't wing loading be low? He told in the lecture that for load factor to be maximum, there must be very effective wing loading, which means lower wing loading, right?
Actually combat aircrafts are more unstable than the normal ones. It is this instability the pilots would harness to move quickly from one point to another, and these quick movements lead us to the delusion that they have high manoeuvrebility. Also I think these aircrafts are designed in such a way that though their wing span is less, the weight is fixed to such a value that the (W/S) would be less.
In combat aircraft the maneuvaribility is good so R is less, and also the wing loading is high,, how it is possible??
they have very high load factor
@@arshdeepbedi6379 if they have high load factor, then wouldn't wing loading be low? He told in the lecture that for load factor to be maximum, there must be very effective wing loading, which means lower wing loading, right?
Formula for angular rate
Actually combat aircrafts are more unstable than the normal ones. It is this instability the pilots would harness to move quickly from one point to another, and these quick movements lead us to the delusion that they have high manoeuvrebility. Also I think these aircrafts are designed in such a way that though their wing span is less, the weight is fixed to such a value that the (W/S) would be less.