@@tyqwe45qehe has a strong point. You can construct opponent range that will be super not correct and vs that not correct range your play will be right
Obviously if the chipleader is a nit you should not shove KJo there but vs most regulars the range presented here is spot on. It’s your job as a poker player to adjust in the correct way. Ben is actually one of the best educators bridging the gap between gto and exploitative principles.
1) I played against this opponent for hours. I show you, how you need to adjust vs loose opponents. Even if you disagree, you get to see what you need to do vs those kind of players, or do you argue they wont exist? 2) I watch almost all of the highstakes youtube final table replays, this will give you a better idea on how people play on those big final tables. 3) yeah sure I can also give him a 10% openraising range and then fold TT ..
0 :21 is a very easy fold for me, you talk your mistake right,thats so funny. i give you right when he was in another position(s) more closer to the big blind.
Ben, yesterday in a $10 tournament, very close to the bubble, I had JJ in the big blind and the button, who was an aggressive player, opened 2.5x, I made 3 bet for 9 bbs and he went all in for 40 bbs. I had about 50 bbs and called with JJ, but he had QQ. Would the best option be to simply fold?
In the buyin ranges Ben plays basically most regulars are opening that wide or wider. Obviously there are going to be nits that you will not be looking to exploit in this fashion.. you will actually start folding more vs those player types. The purpose of this exercise is so Ben can show us that gto sims have the open raiser opening a range that is far tighter than reality in most cases in this spot, so he is highlighting the drastic change you can and should be making to your own range to profit vs them
@@benjaminrolle7004 🎵Harder, Faster, Stronger! - einfach super, dass du gleich zur Sache kommst, Ben und heikle Dinge eiskalt und ohne Umschweife ansprichst. Diesmal gab es zu meinem Bedauern aber keine lustigen Einblendungen, die mich stets zum Lachen bringen. Da es deine Spezialität - um nicht zu sagen Kunst - ist, darf ruhig mehr Sarkasmus in deinen Videos stattfinden; ebenso mehr Mini-Acting-Moments, etwa Imitationen von diversen rumheulenden/nörgelnden Studenten - love your content, man! 👌🥰😸
Great video Ben. If i sum it up , its opponents rfi ranges who dictate our strategy.Our job is to guesstimate villains ranges with maximum accuracy and give the proper response Nothing more logical than that but thats good to hear it again
Yea idk about this. I shove with 99 for 15bb late stage last 20 ppl then i get snap called by big stack with K5 suited. Villain hits a K n i lose. Thats y i raise 3bb-4bb. I see the flop n auto fold. Fking cant beat these superusers
Very true. The original GTO range is wide enough already. Why would he open with 54s in that spot? No blocker effect for that hand and doesn't play well so shallow. Maybe the call vs the reshove range can be tighter but KJo seems to be still borderline at best.
Ok, if you think so. Cant argue with that. I have different experience and I watch almost all of the highstakes UA-cam Final Table replays. People open ridic hands in those spots, but okay. Also, I played against this opponent for hours. But you know better.
I want to tell you a story that happened right in front of me. Years ago, at my table, there was an old-school professional player sitting with us. While we were playing, a new and unfamiliar player joined our table. He pulled out an envelope containing $2,000 from his pocket and handed it to the club supervisor to exchange for chips. This professional player I mentioned was someone we were used to seeing as a conservative player. But as soon as this new person arrived, he shifted to a loose-aggressive style. He turned the new player’s night into a nightmare, relentlessly pressuring him until he lost his last chip. Later on, I asked the professional if he knew this stranger or if there was something personal between them that made him bully him like that. He said, "Not at all. I don’t know him, but the fool walked into the club with an envelope. It’s either that money was borrowed, or he had just sold something he owned. I realized it was probably everything he had, so I took the opportunity to put pressure on him and break him.
Ben, you remind me a lot of a man who used to sit for hours in front of a slot machine with a notebook and pen, calculating patterns. Ben, I love you and follow you, but my friend, you’re giving poker more credit than it deserves, especially online poker. Poker will never be about mathematics, strategy, or predictions. Poker is about sitting face-to-face with people, observing them, reading them, building a mental record of them. It’s about noticing their psychological state, their financial state, their emotional state. It’s about distinguishing between the playful, the serious, the cunning, the straightforward, the deceitful, and the foolish. But online poker will never be anything more than pure gambling. You’re truly amazing, patient, and hardworking. I wish you’d reconsider playing more live poker.
If Its "pure gambling" How can the Guy from the vídeo WINS way more often that the others ?, i play cash games, i didnt lose money for more than one week this entire year, i made 500+ buy ins of my limit (nl100), How can i be so Lucky that o pretty much "never lose" ?.
Your Comment is the Definition of a „Loosing Player“ - sorry but 0 IQ comment - when its pure ganbling i have the same chance to win by jamming any 2 Preflop? Grow up and learn the Game instead of spreading bullshit
@@Peter-uu2wy Yes, it’s pure gambling, unless other factors come into play that make you fold a strong hand or make a hero call. In the end, you win based on these factors, which include reading people, paying attention to the smallest details happening at the table, and your history with the players, which relies entirely on your memory. But yes, 7-2 offsuit does have a chance to win against AA. You’ll tell me that poker is a long run game; I’ll say, good luck with the long run!
Join our discord & learn with the best!
discord.com/invite/RaiseYourEdge
KJo is very assumptive. You can have any assumptions then nodelock in solver and always be 'right'
your statement means nothing
@@tyqwe45qehe has a strong point. You can construct opponent range that will be super not correct and vs that not correct range your play will be right
@tyqwe45qe he is right. I can node lock anything with a favorable conditions to make my assumptions 💯 correct.
Obviously if the chipleader is a nit you should not shove KJo there but vs most regulars the range presented here is spot on. It’s your job as a poker player to adjust in the correct way. Ben is actually one of the best educators bridging the gap between gto and exploitative principles.
1) I played against this opponent for hours. I show you, how you need to adjust vs loose opponents. Even if you disagree, you get to see what you need to do vs those kind of players, or do you argue they wont exist?
2) I watch almost all of the highstakes youtube final table replays, this will give you a better idea on how people play on those big final tables.
3) yeah sure I can also give him a 10% openraising range and then fold TT ..
0 :21 is a very easy fold for me, you talk your mistake right,thats so funny.
i give you right when he was in another position(s) more closer to the big blind.
thx coach
@@RaiseYourEdge 😁
Ben, yesterday in a $10 tournament, very close to the bubble, I had JJ in the big blind and the button, who was an aggressive player, opened 2.5x, I made 3 bet for 9 bbs and he went all in for 40 bbs. I had about 50 bbs and called with JJ, but he had QQ. Would the best option be to simply fold?
unlucky, go next.
It was a fold in my opinion since you had 40 BB and close to the bubble.. People rarely go bluff all in there against a good sized 3 bet.
Thank you master
Very player dependent. KJ vs utg is a fold for most player types and stack sizes . I am sure you knew this player was wide .
In the buyin ranges Ben plays basically most regulars are opening that wide or wider. Obviously there are going to be nits that you will not be looking to exploit in this fashion.. you will actually start folding more vs those player types. The purpose of this exercise is so Ben can show us that gto sims have the open raiser opening a range that is far tighter than reality in most cases in this spot, so he is highlighting the drastic change you can and should be making to your own range to profit vs them
Need new mouse pls. I smash like button too hard. T.T
GOOD SMASH HARDER
@@benjaminrolle7004 🎵Harder, Faster, Stronger! - einfach super, dass du gleich zur Sache kommst, Ben und heikle Dinge eiskalt und ohne Umschweife ansprichst. Diesmal gab es zu meinem Bedauern aber keine lustigen Einblendungen, die mich stets zum Lachen bringen. Da es deine Spezialität - um nicht zu sagen Kunst - ist, darf ruhig mehr Sarkasmus in deinen Videos stattfinden; ebenso mehr Mini-Acting-Moments, etwa Imitationen von diversen rumheulenden/nörgelnden Studenten - love your content, man! 👌🥰😸
Good vid!
You forgot mention :
Subscribing to all sort of subscriptions for poker sims and coaching material. It’s the highest EV loss
haha of course
lOVE IT THANKS
Great video Ben. If i sum it up , its opponents rfi ranges who dictate our strategy.Our job is to guesstimate villains ranges with maximum accuracy and give the proper response Nothing more logical than that but thats good to hear it again
jupp
Ben, why u coaching all the nits, let them call QQ+ on that bubble spot and let me continue to print :)
haha
Yea idk about this. I shove with 99 for 15bb late stage last 20 ppl then i get snap called by big stack with K5 suited. Villain hits a K n i lose. Thats y i raise 3bb-4bb. I see the flop n auto fold. Fking cant beat these superusers
you are the reason poker is profitable...
Because it's rigged
супер си брат , следя те евала
1 spot- it’s just a punt by you, nobody will open so many hands here
Very true. The original GTO range is wide enough already. Why would he open with 54s in that spot? No blocker effect for that hand and doesn't play well so shallow. Maybe the call vs the reshove range can be tighter but KJo seems to be still borderline at best.
Ok, if you think so. Cant argue with that. I have different experience and I watch almost all of the highstakes UA-cam Final Table replays. People open ridic hands in those spots, but okay. Also, I played against this opponent for hours. But you know better.
I want to tell you a story that happened right in front of me. Years ago, at my table, there was an old-school professional player sitting with us. While we were playing, a new and unfamiliar player joined our table. He pulled out an envelope containing $2,000 from his pocket and handed it to the club supervisor to exchange for chips.
This professional player I mentioned was someone we were used to seeing as a conservative player. But as soon as this new person arrived, he shifted to a loose-aggressive style. He turned the new player’s night into a nightmare, relentlessly pressuring him until he lost his last chip.
Later on, I asked the professional if he knew this stranger or if there was something personal between them that made him bully him like that. He said, "Not at all. I don’t know him, but the fool walked into the club with an envelope. It’s either that money was borrowed, or he had just sold something he owned. I realized it was probably everything he had, so I took the opportunity to put pressure on him and break him.
Brutal story but good lesson learned. I feel for that broken guy.
LOL when you get lucky and suck out, doesn’t make it a good re-Jam
🐐
totally bs :(
Last scenario, they just always have aa kk or ak
This channel doesn’t mention anything realistic like that 🤫
@@ianpoulter1442 are you trolling?
Ben, you remind me a lot of a man who used to sit for hours in front of a slot machine with a notebook and pen, calculating patterns. Ben, I love you and follow you, but my friend, you’re giving poker more credit than it deserves, especially online poker. Poker will never be about mathematics, strategy, or predictions. Poker is about sitting face-to-face with people, observing them, reading them, building a mental record of them. It’s about noticing their psychological state, their financial state, their emotional state. It’s about distinguishing between the playful, the serious, the cunning, the straightforward, the deceitful, and the foolish. But online poker will never be anything more than pure gambling.
You’re truly amazing, patient, and hardworking. I wish you’d reconsider playing more live poker.
If Its "pure gambling" How can the Guy from the vídeo WINS way more often that the others ?, i play cash games, i didnt lose money for more than one week this entire year, i made 500+ buy ins of my limit (nl100), How can i be so Lucky that o pretty much "never lose" ?.
Your Comment is the Definition of a „Loosing Player“ - sorry but 0 IQ comment - when its pure ganbling i have the same chance to win by jamming any 2 Preflop? Grow up and learn the Game instead of spreading bullshit
@@antihackerify I see him going through a downswing in all his videos.
About you , we used to reply to anyone tell stories about poker " oh, really "
@@Peter-uu2wy Yes, it’s pure gambling, unless other factors come into play that make you fold a strong hand or make a hero call. In the end, you win based on these factors, which include reading people, paying attention to the smallest details happening at the table, and your history with the players, which relies entirely on your memory. But yes, 7-2 offsuit does have a chance to win against AA. You’ll tell me that poker is a long run game; I’ll say, good luck with the long run!
@@adnankanatry3006 yes, he Probably has way more downdwings than me, since he plays tournaments, what you mean by "oh really"?, you think im liying ?
好的成绩必须好的运气😂 45o也可以赢AAkk🎉🎉🎉
Ach nee.