Defusing an Aggressive Queenside Pawn Pusher | Climbing the Rating Ladder vs. 1535
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- In this continuation of the "Climbing the Rating Ladder" series I take on players of various ratings levels while pointing out typical mistakes and spots for improvement along the way (possibly my own!? :)). Here I commentate a 15+10 game against a player rated 1535 on Chess.com. In an offbeat Slav Defense (1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.a4), I focus on quick development with Black pieces, whereas my opponent goes all-in on queenside expansion. Against such opponents, I've found it's best to either look for a smart counter-break on the queenside (ideally when you're better coordinated), or seek counterplay lesewhere (e.g. a central pawn break).
Review this game on Chess.com: www.chess.com/...
Support the channel: streamlabs.com... or via PayPal: t.co/VBFOLJHt2m
Follow me on Twitch: / johnbartholomew
Follow me on Twitter: / fins0905
Add me as a friend on Chess.com: www.chess.com/...
My 100 Endgames You Must Know Course on Chessable: www.chessable....
My London System (1.d4 and 2.Bf4) Course on Chessable: www.chessable....
The Checkmate Patterns Manual (with CraftyRaf): www.chessable....
My Scandinavian Course (1.e4 d5) on Chessable: www.chessable....
I offer private online chess lessons. Navigate to my "About" section, and then click on "For business inquiries" to reveal my email address.
Recommended chess books and equipment:
1950 Dubrovnik reproduction set (Bobby Fischer's favorite!) on Chess Bazaar: www.chessbazaa.... You can use coupon code JOHN30 for 30% off!
Wood board: amzn.to/2H9iATl
Tune Your Chess Tactics Antenna: amzn.to/2xJ2auH
Amateur to IM: amzn.to/2Dph3IG
Life and Games of Mikhail Tal: amzn.to/2zq741X
![[UA] Eternal Fire проти NAVI | EPL Season 20 Malta](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/chvlsDygrZM/mqdefault.jpg)
Janowski - Capablanca, New York 1916: www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1064780
You know, the analysis part of these videos is helping my analyze MY games. It's fun to see John play and tell us his thoughts, but going through the game is much more valuable. It's easy to see the lines that I analyzed and played, but it does kinda hurt my ego when I have no choice but to look at the lines that I blundered or missed all together lol. John stays down to earth and I'm trying to learn that. Thanks for the vids John, they're helping me plan your demise soon :)
you are easily one of the most wholesome and genuine chess youtubers, hope you keep at it. just games of chess and your insightful commentary, that's all we need!
I'm sure you could say he's the most wholesome and genuine of all youtubers lol. Definitely in the top 100 at least, but he probably doesn't seem quite so wholesome anymore if you find yourself sitting across the board from him.
This guy played really well all things considered.
Agreed
Nice game. I wonder if that was in fact some high-level, modern opening prep by the opponent, but he just ran out of ideas against a better opponent?
These are very relaxing
Gotta love the pronunciation John. ❤.😅. It’s Indiyantzi…. As in Native American Indians.
"You should allow your feeling be overruled by calculation." Useful advice
Even though the premature a4 took this one out of theory, it was still a very instructive game!
Thanks John for sharing this great game with us and the overall explanation about your thought proces in the game with every move. like it how you explain it for us in very understandable way. Keep up your great vids, work & chessgames. Cheers!
I really like this series and listening to your explanations
John pls consider turning your camera to manual focus - It zooms back and forth when it's on auto mode. It doesn't know whether to focus on you, the mic, or your tea/coffee.
thanks John Barthonskajonyjon!
These videos are so helpful.Thanks!
My pleasure - thanks for watching!
hey John, can't wait for you vs a 1700 rating guy. love your videos.
I just started looking at your book reviews and Tony Rotellas book caught my eye. Would you be so kind as to make a video playing the Kalashnikov as black? Preferably in the standard category 😃
I hate playing against pawn pushers. I came to play chess, not Connect 4.
"I prefer the lichess way." John Bartholomew, 2023
One question, why are these single games still in the climbing the ladder series after your first videos of the series where you actually climbed the ladder from 0 to 2000?
The series is not meant to have an end.
“Defusing” 😂
Happy Saturday!
Perfect chess
john loyal to lichess at 31 40. great to see it jb, just another reason u a don of educational chess
thanks John BarthonyJohnyJohn JohnskathonyJohny Barjohny JohnyJohn
shoutout to Neverness even though he was not present in the non-existent spectator chat
8 years and still at it!
Thank you John! I was sub 800 before I found your channel. Now I'm close to 2000, and I owe so much of it to this series.
You've done the chess community a great service.
Man that's incredible progress. Congratulations!
Solid play! Easy for me to fall into a "coasting" mindset when these kinds of openings happen and expect the win. Better to play patient and convert. Learning a lot here!
Really interesting game Minnesota Fins. I could easily see you as a poker pro, due to the fact that your poker face is beyond compare, as demonstrated in your April Fool's video's!
Very interesting game. Your opponent played some brave chess.
Redundancy is the perfect term to describe having all your pieces defended to stabilize your position. We use that term in structural engineering to describe something similar
When you play e4 e5 it seems like this sort of lack of development gets punished much easier. Feels like they can kind of get away with it vs d4
As an intermediate-level player, I often struggle against opponents who push their pawns. I found this video very instructive. Thank you.
Great to hear - cheers!
This game really brings home to me the concept of being patient, especially in closed situations, and let the game unfold. Also, your advice to keep it tight when you are winning is excellent! Thanks so much!
I wonder how much playing a titled player over 1000 points higher ranked impacts playing style. If it does at all, but perhaps that player wouldn't have played so unorthodox in the opening, but felt pressured and decided to get you out of theory?
It's an interesting question, and it's the one variable that's hard to control for unless I sandbag. Perhaps someone with statistical knowledge of results by rating gap will know!
I love watching you play games against pawn pushers. It's made it much easier to deal with them because I used to over react to them all the time lol. Now I try to focus on slowing them down and attacking weak pawns. It definitely helps.
Nice! That's the way to do it!
14:43 This side discussion here alludes to something that actually helped me as a player. When I first watched masters commenting their games real time (John being one of the early ones), I thought they were constantly changing their plans (and that their plans were therefore fake). But with time, I realized that they're staying flexible. They're paying attention to their opponents' moves and adjusting accordingly - it seems so obvious now, but I had to see it repeatedly to put it together.
"Your feelings should always be potentially overruled by your calculation" is a great advice, not just in chess 😁👍🏻
So good to see that you're back at "Climbing the Rating Ladder" content! This is my favourite and so helpful - thanks so much for sharing!
Wow! White played c5 twice ! 6:22
Your mind is beautiful. The way you
articulate thought process is unmatched. Always a great watch. Thanks for the content.
Very Instructive Thought Process! I'll use this type of Q and A in games involving D4 where I get these type of positions more than often. Thanks!
Happy to hear it was useful to you!
wondering why taking the knight on c3 wasn’t even considered in the first game specially when the queen moved wouldn’t that destroy king side structure and makes it harder for your opponent to castle anywhere? 15:50
Wonderful game, I get so much from hearing your though process and the rationale for assessing your candidate moves. Thanks John.
Good instructive video,showing us how not to help the opponent develop (d5xc4) or Bb4 nothing really doing there...
setting up kxe5 was good
Love it John. Thanks for the content!
Sometimes I anticipate your moves but sometimes they come as something of a shock.
Hey john, this is Guys
Reverse London
27:50 isn't black immediately winning another pawn if Rxb1 Rxb1 Rxf2 Kxf2 Bxb1
I think that's why the computer says Rc3 was inaccurate.
Rook c4! Rook c4! That's what I thought without thinking. I should really think through my moves like you do in your videos but my mind is always a blank.
John calculating queen traps is always astounding to me. Moves I consider basically equal and don't even have the tools to differentiate between the strength of (i.e. they're all "good" and the analysis stops) yet John finds a way to choose better moves through complicated analysis I don't even start to think about.
This must have been so tough to play against. All your pieces were perfectly coordinated.
Put speed to 0.75x. Any slower and JB sounds drunk. But at 0.75x he sounds normal or maybe a little sleepy.
What a ridiculous opening for white
John, I love your videos, but isn't the intention with these to climb the rating ladder? And if so, why do you go from playing someone who is rated 1800 + to then uploading a video against a player rated less than 1600?
Thank you!
The aim of this series is educational, so I bounce around and play different rating levels. The goal is not to gain rating or speedrun through my opponents; hence why I'm playing on my main account.
@@JohnBartholomewChess then is “climbing” not a bit of a misdescription of the series? Climbing meaning going up. Surely, “moving around the rating ladder” would be more appropriate
@@Funintherain13 It's meant to help the viewer climb, not me. I've already climbed :D
@@JohnBartholomewChess ah got it! Cheers!! Love your vids
When John says a move is "interesting"...it means it's bad
😅
@@JohnBartholomewChess Thanks for the reply John!