Tu rêves, l'époque n'est plus la même, qu'elle retrouve son indépendance vis à vis des états Unis serait une bonne chose et qu'elle redevienne une puissance industrielle serait super aussi mais pour le reste sa taille et la mondialisation sur le plan des échanges, du commerce, etc. font qu'elle ne peut pas rester seule.
@@sanapadsense1999 l'expression même "rester seul' est une vue de l'esprit qui vise à nous maintenir inféodé. Nous pouvons très bien multiplier les coopérations internationales tout en restant indépendant. Mais pour être libre de ses choix, il faut enlever les attaches. Le monde du 21eme siècle n'est plus exclusivement axé sur l'Amérique, mais sur le monde entier. Réveillez vous !
I agree with independence from the USA. But in today's world, more than ever, there are only 2 powers of any consequence: America and China. Everyone else is either a vassal state or irrelevant. Even the EU is irrelevant on the world stage, as much as they like to think otherwise
It's "greatness?" Like in America, what does being "Great Again" even mean? Does that mean going back to colonialism and mercantilism? Burning bridges with fellow democracies for the feeling of "greatness?" France is a massive economic power and financially better off than it was in the 1800s and 1900s. I wouldn't trade my contemporary time in America for the 1950s or 1800s. I'm sure you wouldn't trade yours eighter.
De Gaulle was not a smart person. He was a very pompous and pretentious man who did not understand the significance and importance of NATO. The only good thing he did was ending the war in Algeria. His Constitution of 1958 was a disaster. It practically created a monarchy.
Pulling out was a signature move of his. He betrayed the Pied Noir population in French Algeria and pulled out of the Nato integrated command structure. Sure, it made sense from a domestic political perspective and it fit French foreign policy ambitions but he sure was greasy about parts of it.
De Gaulle était le plus grand président. He was the greatest president.
Vous avez raison, Dominique!
Extremely interesting and accurate.
Not that much, theres still too much Brit resentment towards anything French, its amazing how it still is relevant today.
Very interesting.
Superb lecture, thank you.
C’est bon
He famously said when he was accused of abandoning France’s friends. ‘ France does not have friends….it has interests’
Il avait raison.La France doit retrouver sa grandeur.
Nous étions à égale distance des Américains et des Russes.
Tu rêves, l'époque n'est plus la même, qu'elle retrouve son indépendance vis à vis des états Unis serait une bonne chose et qu'elle redevienne une puissance industrielle serait super aussi mais pour le reste sa taille et la mondialisation sur le plan des échanges, du commerce, etc. font qu'elle ne peut pas rester seule.
@@sanapadsense1999 Elle peut rester seule. Elle a la bombe atomique.
@@sanapadsense1999 l'expression même "rester seul' est une vue de l'esprit qui vise à nous maintenir inféodé. Nous pouvons très bien multiplier les coopérations internationales tout en restant indépendant. Mais pour être libre de ses choix, il faut enlever les attaches.
Le monde du 21eme siècle n'est plus exclusivement axé sur l'Amérique, mais sur le monde entier. Réveillez vous !
I agree with independence from the USA. But in today's world, more than ever, there are only 2 powers of any consequence: America and China. Everyone else is either a vassal state or irrelevant. Even the EU is irrelevant on the world stage, as much as they like to think otherwise
It's "greatness?" Like in America, what does being "Great Again" even mean? Does that mean going back to colonialism and mercantilism? Burning bridges with fellow democracies for the feeling of "greatness?" France is a massive economic power and financially better off than it was in the 1800s and 1900s. I wouldn't trade my contemporary time in America for the 1950s or 1800s. I'm sure you wouldn't trade yours eighter.
De Gaulle was not a smart person. He was a very pompous and pretentious man who did not understand the significance and importance of NATO. The only good thing he did was ending the war in Algeria. His Constitution of 1958 was a disaster. It practically created a monarchy.
Vive De Gaulle 🇨🇵
Pulling out was a signature move of his. He betrayed the Pied Noir population in French Algeria and pulled out of the Nato integrated command structure. Sure, it made sense from a domestic political perspective and it fit French foreign policy ambitions but he sure was greasy about parts of it.