How to implement Linear Regression from scratch with Python

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2022
  • In the second lesson of the Machine Learning from Scratch course, we will learn how to implement the Linear Regression algorithm.
    You can find the code here: github.com/AssemblyAI-Example...
    Previous lesson: • How to implement KNN f...
    Next lesson: • How to implement Logis...
    Welcome to the Machine Learning from Scratch course by AssemblyAI.
    Thanks to libraries like Scikit-learn we can use most ML algorithms with a couple of lines of code. But knowing how these algorithms work inside is very important. Implementing them hands-on is a great way to achieve this.
    And mostly, they are easier than you’d think to implement.
    In this course, we will learn how to implement these 10 algorithms.
    We will quickly go through how the algorithms work and then implement them in Python using the help of NumPy.
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ CONNECT ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    🖥️ Website: www.assemblyai.com/?...
    🐦 Twitter: / assemblyai
    🦾 Discord: / discord
    ▶️ Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/AssemblyAI?...
    🔥 We're hiring! Check our open roles: www.assemblyai.com/careers
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    #MachineLearning #DeepLearning

КОМЕНТАРІ • 75

  • @Artificial_Intelligence_AI
    @Artificial_Intelligence_AI Рік тому +11

    This channel is amazing ❤. This is the type of content a lot of instructors forget to teach you when you’re learning ML but this girl explains everything very well from scratch. Congratulations for your content and I hope to watch more of your videos, you deserve more views for this incredible job.

  • @markkirby2543
    @markkirby2543 9 місяців тому +2

    This is amazing. Thank you so much for all your clear explanations. You really know you stuff, and you make learning this complex material fun and exciting.

  • @afizs
    @afizs Рік тому +7

    I have used Linear Regression many times, but never implemented from scratch. Thanks for an awesome video. Waiting for the next one.

  • @ayo4590
    @ayo4590 Рік тому +2

    Thank you so much, this video really helped me get started with understanding machine learning algorithms. I would love if you could do a video on how you would modify the algorithm for multivariate linear regression.

  • @1000marcelo1000
    @1000marcelo1000 Рік тому +1

    Amazing video! I learned so much from it! Congrats!!!
    Could explain more detailed all of this and show next steps like "where" and "how" this can be implemented further in some scenarios?

  • @tienshinhan8189
    @tienshinhan8189 6 місяців тому +1

    I rarely bother commenting because I'm rarely impressed. This video was amazing. I love that you're showing theory and OOP. Usually I see basic definitions and code all in one script.

  • @bendirval3612
    @bendirval3612 Рік тому +7

    Wow, that really was from scratch. And the hardest way possible. But it's perfect for teaching python. Thanks!

  • @m.bouanane4455
    @m.bouanane4455 6 місяців тому +2

    The gradient calculation lacks the multiplication by coefficient 2, I guess.

  • @MU_2000
    @MU_2000 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you for this video. Before i wached it i spend a couple of day to understand how to make custome code without frameworks ))

  • @l4dybu9
    @l4dybu9 Рік тому +6

    Thank u so much for this video. 💖💖
    It's makes us feel more confident when we know how to do it drom scratch than using libraries ✨

  • @kreativeworld2073
    @kreativeworld2073 Рік тому

    Thank you so much.
    It really helped me understand the entire concept:)

  • @lamluuuc9384
    @lamluuuc9384 10 місяців тому +11

    I think there is a problem of missing the 2 multiplication in calculating dw, db in the .fit() method:
    dw = (1/n_samples) * np.dot(X.T, (y_pred-y)) * 2
    db = (1/n_samples) * np.sum(y_pred-y) * 2
    If we follow the slides, it's not absolutely wrong but it can affect the learning rate

    • @priyanshumsharma4276
      @priyanshumsharma4276 9 місяців тому

      No, after derivation, there is no square.

    • @zh7866
      @zh7866 8 місяців тому

      The comment suggests multiplication with 2 based on derivation rule NOT square

    • @jhicks2306
      @jhicks2306 5 місяців тому

      Agree with this! Also, thanks, Misra, for the awesome video series.

    • @surajsamal4161
      @surajsamal4161 3 місяці тому +2

      @@priyanshumsharma4276 he's not talking about the square he's talking about the square which came down cause of derivative

  • @luis96xd
    @luis96xd Рік тому +3

    Amazing video, I liked the code and the explanations, it was easy to read and understand, thanks! 😁👍👏💯

  • @GeorgeZoto
    @GeorgeZoto Рік тому +5

    Another amazing video! Slight typo in the definition of matrix multiplication and =dw part as well as an omission on the constant 2 (which does not effect calculations much) in the code when you define the gradients but other than that this is beautiful 😃

  • @traagshorts4617
    @traagshorts4617 Рік тому

    How did you fit the dimensions for the test and weights in the predict function

  • @srinivasanshanmugam9527
    @srinivasanshanmugam9527 6 місяців тому

    Thanks for this video, May I know , why we need to run in a for loop for 1000 iterations?

  • @AbuAl7sn1
    @AbuAl7sn1 28 днів тому

    thanks lady .. that was easy

  • @compilation_exe3821
    @compilation_exe3821 Рік тому +3

    YOU guys are AWWWWESOME

  • @LouisDuran
    @LouisDuran 4 місяці тому

    WHat check could be added in the case that the model is not converging to the best fit within the n_iters value?

  • @harry-ce7ub
    @harry-ce7ub 4 місяці тому +2

    Do you not need to np.sum() the result of np.dot(x, (y_pred-y)) in dw as well as multiply by 2?

  • @KumR
    @KumR 5 місяців тому

    Wow... Awesome.. Do you have something like this for Deep learning algo ?

  • @rajesh_ramesh
    @rajesh_ramesh 7 днів тому

    the gradient part actually misses the coefficient 2 in both differentiations (dw, db) and y - y^

  • @sajinsanthosh9536
    @sajinsanthosh9536 Рік тому +2

    followed the tutorial exactly right, but still different. Using trial version. Thank you*

  • @parthaguha4705
    @parthaguha4705 Рік тому +1

    Awesome explanation😇

  • @surendrakakani7014
    @surendrakakani7014 11 місяців тому

    I have taken input(200 ,1) while executing above program i am getting y_pred as (200,200) can and geting dw shape as (1,200) but dw should be (1,1) right any body explaing is that correct

  • @mohamedsadeksnoussi8479
    @mohamedsadeksnoussi8479 Рік тому +4

    The content is really insightful, but for dw and db, should it be (2/n_samples) instead of (1/n_samples) ?

    • @adarshtiwari7395
      @adarshtiwari7395 Рік тому +2

      did you figure out why she used the equations without 2 in the video?

    • @mohamedsadeksnoussi8479
      @mohamedsadeksnoussi8479 Рік тому +4

      Hi@@adarshtiwari7395, unfortunately no. But (2/n_samples) appears to be correct.
      I checked out other resources and all of them used (2/n_samples).
      You can even try it by yourselves, (1/n_samples) doesn't affect the model behavior (performance), but from my point of view, it's incorrect.

    • @prashantkumar7390
      @prashantkumar7390 Рік тому +2

      @@adarshtiwari7395 It doesn't change our actual optimisation problem, I mean when the mean_square_loss is minimised, any scalar*mean_square_loss will be minimised. Hence using 2 or not doesn't make a difference at all.

    • @mohammedabdulhafeezkhan4633
      @mohammedabdulhafeezkhan4633 Рік тому +2

      @@prashantkumar7390 But it is better to use 2 in the equation, even though it's a constant and doesn't affect the outcome in a major way.

    • @prashantkumar7390
      @prashantkumar7390 Рік тому +1

      @@mohammedabdulhafeezkhan4633 it doesn't affect the outcome AT ALL.

  • @alexisadr
    @alexisadr Рік тому

    Thank you!

  • @MahmouudTolba
    @MahmouudTolba Рік тому +1

    your code is clean

  • @2122345able
    @2122345able 6 місяців тому

    where is the part where gradient decent is being coded , how the code will know when to stop ?

  • @gechimmchanel2917
    @gechimmchanel2917 Рік тому +1

    Has anyone encountered the same situation as me when given a larger dataset with about 4 weights and 200 rows, the result predicts -inf or NaN , anyone have a way to fix this??

    • @gechimmchanel2917
      @gechimmchanel2917 Рік тому

      [-inf -inf -inf] -inf
      [-inf -inf -inf] -inf
      [-inf -inf -inf] -inf
      result của weight and bias :))

  • @tiagosilva856
    @tiagosilva856 Рік тому +1

    Where did you put the "2" of the mathematical formula in dw and db on phyton?

    • @mgreek31
      @mgreek31 Рік тому +1

      the 2 is a scaling factor that can be omitted.

    • @tiagosilva856
      @tiagosilva856 Рік тому +1

      @@mgreek31 ty. I understand. But omitting that don't change the performance? M.S.E still be the same if we don't ommite the "2"?

    • @mgreek31
      @mgreek31 Рік тому +1

      @@tiagosilva856 MSE will still be the same. intuitively if you multiply the 2 in the formula it scales the x for all values of x, therefore removing it will affect the whole dataset in the same way as if nothing happened

  • @rbodavan8771
    @rbodavan8771 Рік тому +2

    how you designed your video templets is awesome.
    but it would be good for learner if you also post it on kaggle notebook and link it each other. sometimes it's happened to me like best to read then watch. let me know your thought

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  Рік тому +1

      You can find the code in our github repo. The link is in the description :)

  • @omaramil5103
    @omaramil5103 Рік тому

    Thank you ❤

  • @okefejoseph6825
    @okefejoseph6825 2 місяці тому

    Is there a way I can get the slide?

  • @akifarslan6022
    @akifarslan6022 Рік тому +2

    Güzel video

  • @shivamdubey4783
    @shivamdubey4783 Рік тому

    can you plzz explain why we took x.T transpose

    • @0xmatriksh
      @0xmatriksh Рік тому +2

      It is because we are doing dot product of two matrices here. So we need two matrices to be in the form of mxn and nxp, that means the number of columns in first matrix should be same as the number of rows in second matrix.
      And here,
      Suppose number of rows of X is n(which is same as y)
      But the n is number of rows for both of them so we transpose X to make n in column to match the n of mxn and nxp(like explained above) to successfully dot product them

  • @user-qo1xg5oq7e
    @user-qo1xg5oq7e 8 місяців тому

    ادامه بده دختر کارت عالیه ممنون ازت

  • @prigithjoseph7018
    @prigithjoseph7018 Рік тому

    Hi can you please upload, presentation file also

  • @user-xh2di1kv3f
    @user-xh2di1kv3f 9 місяців тому

    your explanation is amazing and I see how linear regression works however this only works with 1 feature
    and if you want to implement it with more than one it will fail.

  • @user-qo1xg5oq7e
    @user-qo1xg5oq7e 8 місяців тому

    لطفا ویدیو های بیشتری بسازید

  • @user-do7jv6fk3z
    @user-do7jv6fk3z 4 місяці тому +1

    I am not sure if you copied this code from Patrick Loeber. He has a youtube video with the same code posted years ago. If you did, please give credit to Patrick.
    This is the name of his video: Linear Regression in Python - Machine Learning From Scratch 02 - Python Tutorial

  • @jinxiong2973
    @jinxiong2973 Рік тому

    how to improve my attention span , I have good ideas and soft that I tNice tutorialnk up , the problem is putting it down in fruit loops and knowing

  • @ge_song5
    @ge_song5 19 днів тому

    what's her name?

  • @hiteshmistry413
    @hiteshmistry413 Рік тому

    Thank you very much, You made Linear Regression very easy for me. Here is how the linear regression training looks like in action "ua-cam.com/video/2QqLl_wpfSo/v-deo.html"

  • @hannukoistinen5329
    @hannukoistinen5329 8 місяців тому

    Forget Python!!! It's just fashionable right now. R is much, much better!!!