"This was extracted from..." "An asteroid? The deepest mine in the world? The seawater under the north pole?" "No, it was extracted from pencil." "Is that a town in Eastern Europe?" "No, just pencil, from my pocket."
I remember hearing about 'buckyballs' when i was younger. It was one of the things that got me interested in chemistry and physics to begin with. I remember (though it has been many years) reading that c60 has interesting properties when exposed to radiation, namely absorption properties. If this was the case then c60 could certainly have applications in that field.
The buckyballs I first knew were those little packs of spherical neodymium magnets, so I was confused when the C60 buckyballs popped up all over Google
I have to agree. This might sound like I'm ranting on the British education system, but I think it's more spread everywhere. I was put into a foundation program as a part of the process of being admitted into the University of Edinburgh. The program was equivalent to A-levels (Scottish advance-level material) and what I noticed was that the instructors were:- A) Not used to being asked questions. B) Training students to answer the standardized tests. Tests should, somehow, be about discussion.
"Thank you for answering my question. But that leads back to my original question. If they can not "see" them, how do they know how they look, and how to build their diagrams. Thank you again for helping." ==How to figure out the structure of a molecule? There are several ways : 1. X-ray crystallography but I think you need a crystal sample. 2. NMR : looking for peaks in the signal 3. Infra-red spectroscopy 4. Scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscope, force electron microscope 5. Chemists know a great deal about the properties of atoms and how they bind together (quantum physics) so it is rather predictable. They know how many bonds atoms make, bond angles and ultimately you can derive the entire molecular structure with no need to see the molecule.
At 1:58 - The mathematician who said that the molecule looks like a soccer ball should get a special prize just for using the correct name of the ball.
great vidieo! I was expecting to hear a little bit about the double slit experiment performed in 1999 with Buckyballs, that showed the Wave-particle duality on "big" molecules.
a question out of curiosity, when a molecule or atom is put inside Buckminsterfullerine, is it suspended in the center of the C60 or is it just bouncing around in it?
Football refers to a type of sport, not a specific one. The word "foot" means on foot, as opposed to polo where you ride a horse, or bowling where you stand in place. There is kicking in every kind of football, but that is not necessarily a major part of the game. According to Wikipedia "Unqualified, the word football applies to whichever form of football is the most popular in the regional context in which the word appears, including association football, as well as American football" etc.
Fantastic video, very long too. It's always nice to see a new scientist in the fold. Every time I see a video I can't wait for the next one :) Also, wow! already 260 videos and that's just on this channel. How does Brady do it? I love these videos :)
My good friend goes to Rice University where Bucky Balls were discovered, and he is good friends with Dr. Tour who works with these things and is considered to be one of the top ten chemists in the world.
it would be interesting because N60 would have a different structure because nitrogen forms 3 bonds while carbon forms 4. It might have triangle rings. Of course this might be hard to make.
@Glassjaw003 your exactly right i feel the same way im a 15 year old who loves chhemistry and i find it very annoying when i show my friends an experiment such as homemade sodium chlorate plus a gummy bear they just sit hey and go "ooh pretty fire"
It seems that so far the best we are able to get is one or two atoms inside a C60 fullerene, with little word on application. Using fullerenes as faraday cages to protect atoms and molecules from currents sounds very intersting though.
Since both carbon and helium already have a mass and that a C60 molecule is quite heavy to begin with, I'm not really sure how that would work. Helium doesn't exactly deduct weight, but because it is initially lighter than "air" (which is actually a very wide variety of gasses) you might establish some conditions where the air would rather fall in under the molecule than vice versa.
@kitkitmeow24 It's named after Buckminster Fuller, who invented the geodesic dome, which has the same geometric arrangement. I'd post a link but YT doesn't let me...
Thank you for answering my question. But that leads back to my original question. If they can not "see" them, how do they know how they look, and how to build their diagrams. Thank you again for helping.
Actually by putting in hydrogen or helium you would only make it heavier and not ad any buoyancy ;) You see the C60 molecule displaces the same volume of air whether you put something inside or not, which means the empty C60 with only vacuum inside, is already the lightest form you can have. Surprisingly the density of C60 1.65 g/cm³ is not that much heavier than air 1.2 g/cm³. I estimate C94 to have a density of 1.32 g/cm³. But I don't need to reinvent the wheel here! --> watch?v=F74Fb099ESc
@Ndizzyinthehizzy Also, if a reaction has more than one product, then the balanced version tells you how much of each you're going to get. If a particular reaction *can't* be balanced, then it means the reaction is impossible. Finally, (and this is just a theory) the number of molecules that take part in a chemical reaction is important, because they all have to meet at the same place and time -- so more molecules required for a reaction means less reactions per second, so it'll go slower.
I didn't know you could hide things inside buckyballs, that's the coolest thing ever! Did that ultrasonic bath thingy cause static in the camera or was it just loud?
Well, you can't really take visible light pictures of atoms because they're smaller than the wavelength of visible light, and in any case, atoms don't really look anything like the models. Models of atoms and molecules are more like a simplified way of describing the chemical and physical properties rather than a zoomed in version of what they actually look like. You can totally find pictures of atoms, though. Start by googling "atom electron microscope" and look at the pictures.
When the guy in the lab coat says "so I got two beakers" he picked up two Erlenmeyer flasks. Perhaps a bit misleading but then I noticed he makes the same mistake again @ 4:38 .
I'm a bit disappointed you didn't explain where the name Buckminsterfullerene comes from or told us about the man it's named after. Richard Buckminster Fuller was one of the greatest engineers and architects of the second half of the 20th Century. His geodesic dome forms are still being used in today's architecture (e.g. Edam Project) and it is one of the rare occasions where nature & chemistry is influencing the forms of our buildings. Wow at 1:25! Doesn't Pete look young and handsome?
I like how the chemist says, "...to save time I'm going to use Ultra-Sonic Bath" so nonchalantly. I can imagine him saying "To clear forest, I'm going to use Nuclear device" or "To disperse protesters, I'm going to use Death-ray" in the same manner. "To thicken hair volume, I'm going to use Incinerator oven."
@Ndizzyinthehizzy Take the formation of water (unbalanced) as an example: 1. H2 + O2 --> H2O Compared to the correctly balanced version: 2. 2H2 + O2 --> 2H2O The correctly balanced version tells that we need twice as much hydrogen as oxygen to make the reaction happen, and we'll get the same number of water molecules at the end as hydrogen when we started. This is pretty important in an industrial setting; an unbalanced equation is like a (cooking) recipe without quantities.
how was it discovered spectroscopically?what i mean is,normally,when an element is excited,it produces light of a unique frequency,with which we detect it.but how was c60 discovered.does that mean that behavior of electrons in c60 is different,moreover unique?please answer,i am confused
I have a weird conception about solvents (I haven't yet learned further than acid anhydrous something (e.g. CO2 or SO3)) So basically I remember a publication about adding hydrogen to graphene making graphane (I really hope i don't say the wrong names here) which makes transformation in it's bonds structure and for each carbon atom there's an hydrogen. So like that, can something be done with C60 without destroying it's structure, and making it an solvent? Or changes due to hydrogen bonds?
"Soccer" is just a change to the original word "Assoc", which was the name of the FOOTBALL association, made by a group of clubs in the UK. Football always has been the correct term, and always will be. I have not conducted any further research into why the americans would "Steal" the name, but i'm guessing that since america started off as a british colony, and since, changed the rules, but kept the name ( football )
if he would been my chemistry teacher i whould have become a chemist 4 sure i find it very very a interesting and mindteasing to watch ur videos ty 4 making them
Is He@C60 neutrally buoyant or is it just a lighter form, and would there be any way of using that in the same way we use carbon nanotubes-fiber? Also is there any application for the use of C60 in smelting?
My main memory of my last year of school was so many of my teachers complaining about how limited they were by the curriculum and how a lot of it was completely pointless to learn and shouldn't be on the exams.
I'm not sure if the carbon really "wants" to bond in a C70 molecule. Though I'm not very experienced in that, my focus is more on hydrocarbon structures in organic chemistry and a fullerene is pure carbon. Personally I'd say that it's probably possible, though I'm not really aware of how it would be done practically.
I don't know about superconductors getting any benefit, but creating large molecules and using temperature to change the overall size to "Weave" other molecules could be nifty. Do what nature does.
Your right tests don't prove you have an understanding but time and time again it seems that when you have confidence you know and understand a subject the less you understand it generally no more so then if you were only doing tests the real way to educate is not to teach but to let them learn
@derick1259 Not almost 2 years ago. Fred was one when I originally posted my comment. Him being number one doesn't anger me as much as Fred, not nearly. He actually had a good idea, and profited off of it. I do still wish something informative was up there.
I would, however, be curious as to the thoroughness of the study: the number of test subjects, the credibility of the institution conducting the test, and other pertainent factors. I probably should have looked into the citations and references rather than being lazy and skipping on to other things, but yes, I too am curious as to the possibilities.
? neither was credit given to the erlen meyer... He gets lots of credit, this video is about the great aspects of fullerens. You really expect them to credit this or that person explicitely in every video (because every video shows something that someone discovered). At the end the guy even says 'we should be gratefull for fuller that...' so you got your credits...
At the beginning, "Last week, the Google logo looked really strange. It had a molecule in the shape of a football in the middle of it." Thats what I was meaning.
There was no credit given to Buckminster Fuller in this video. I mean the structure is actually named after the guy. Give him some credit! Otherwise great video.
I have one question, if anyone could answer or help me out, I would greatly appreciate it. I always see these awesome diagrams and hear these really interesting videos about atoms but have never seen an actual picture of one. Why is that? The have these little balls and sticks representing the atoms and describe them but how do they know? I have been trying to find actual pictures of atoms. We can see stars and nebulas, distant galaxies and planets, but why not atoms. Can anyone help me?
@5:19 and when i turn it on, it makes this rather...
ALL GLORY TO HYPNOTOAD
"This was extracted from..."
"An asteroid? The deepest mine in the world? The seawater under the north pole?"
"No, it was extracted from pencil."
"Is that a town in Eastern Europe?"
"No, just pencil, from my pocket."
I remember hearing about 'buckyballs' when i was younger. It was one of the things that got me interested in chemistry and physics to begin with.
I remember (though it has been many years) reading that c60 has interesting properties when exposed to radiation, namely absorption properties.
If this was the case then c60 could certainly have applications in that field.
The buckyballs I first knew were those little packs of spherical neodymium magnets, so I was confused when the C60 buckyballs popped up all over Google
I have to agree. This might sound like I'm ranting on the British education system, but I think it's more spread everywhere.
I was put into a foundation program as a part of the process of being admitted into the University of Edinburgh. The program was equivalent to A-levels (Scottish advance-level material) and what I noticed was that the instructors were:-
A) Not used to being asked questions.
B) Training students to answer the standardized tests.
Tests should, somehow, be about discussion.
"intellectual stimulation" Thanks for the show Periodic Videos!
"Thank you for answering my question. But that leads back to my original question. If they can not "see" them, how do they know how they look, and how to build their diagrams. Thank you again for helping."
==How to figure out the structure of a molecule? There are several ways : 1. X-ray crystallography but I think you need a crystal sample.
2. NMR : looking for peaks in the signal
3. Infra-red spectroscopy
4. Scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscope, force electron microscope
5. Chemists know a great deal about the properties of atoms and how they bind together (quantum physics) so it is rather predictable. They know how many bonds atoms make, bond angles and ultimately you can derive the entire molecular structure with no need to see the molecule.
I have no plans to study chemistry in the near future, I'm more into astronomy, but these videos are extremely interesting... I love them!
At 1:58 - The mathematician who said that the molecule looks like a soccer ball should get a special prize just for using the correct name of the ball.
That mans accent is awesome!
wow this was a pretty fascinating video, i never knew about the @ symbol used in chemistry
great vidieo! I was expecting to hear a little bit about the double slit experiment performed in 1999 with Buckyballs, that showed the Wave-particle duality on "big" molecules.
i really enjoy your guy's longer videos
This is easily one of my favorite videos from this channel... just really fascinating. :)
a question out of curiosity, when a molecule or atom is put inside Buckminsterfullerine, is it suspended in the center of the C60 or is it just bouncing around in it?
Football refers to a type of sport, not a specific one. The word "foot" means on foot, as opposed to polo where you ride a horse, or bowling where you stand in place. There is kicking in every kind of football, but that is not necessarily a major part of the game. According to Wikipedia "Unqualified, the word football applies to whichever form of football is the most popular in the regional context in which the word appears, including association football, as well as American football" etc.
Fantastic video, very long too. It's always nice to see a new scientist in the fold. Every time I see a video I can't wait for the next one :)
Also, wow! already 260 videos and that's just on this channel. How does Brady do it?
I love these videos :)
I've read science fiction where Buckyballs are mentioned. Now I know what they were talking about. Thank you!
:) I love how Martyn uses props to explain things! Love this.
My good friend goes to Rice University where Bucky Balls were discovered, and he is good friends with Dr. Tour who works with these things and is considered to be one of the top ten chemists in the world.
Graphite is actually crystalline (it even gives a very sharp XRD peak).
it would be interesting because N60 would have a different structure because nitrogen forms 3 bonds while carbon forms 4. It might have triangle rings. Of course this might be hard to make.
Hypnotoad
"it's a football...some chemists are not sportingly aware".
Love the professors dry sense of humour
@Sharingan266 It's probably pretty stationary, held roughly in the centre by a variety of intermolecular forces.
I love Moriarty's mug!
What does the * stand for in BEST from "worlds best advisor" mug?
@Glassjaw003 your exactly right i feel the same way im a 15 year old who loves chhemistry and i find it very annoying when i show my friends an experiment such as homemade sodium chlorate plus a gummy bear they just sit hey and go "ooh pretty fire"
It seems that so far the best we are able to get is one or two atoms inside a C60 fullerene, with little word on application. Using fullerenes as faraday cages to protect atoms and molecules from currents sounds very intersting though.
Since both carbon and helium already have a mass and that a C60 molecule is quite heavy to begin with, I'm not really sure how that would work. Helium doesn't exactly deduct weight, but because it is initially lighter than "air" (which is actually a very wide variety of gasses) you might establish some conditions where the air would rather fall in under the molecule than vice versa.
@kitkitmeow24 It's named after Buckminster Fuller, who invented the geodesic dome, which has the same geometric arrangement. I'd post a link but YT doesn't let me...
The professor is such a natural at all these videos now!
Thank you for answering my question. But that leads back to my original question. If they can not "see" them, how do they know how they look, and how to build their diagrams. Thank you again for helping.
Actually by putting in hydrogen or helium you would only make it heavier and not ad any buoyancy ;)
You see the C60 molecule displaces the same volume of air whether you put something inside or not, which means the empty C60 with only vacuum inside, is already the lightest form you can have. Surprisingly the density of C60 1.65 g/cm³ is not that much heavier than air 1.2 g/cm³. I estimate C94 to have a density of 1.32 g/cm³.
But I don't need to reinvent the wheel here! --> watch?v=F74Fb099ESc
0:39 Pavel Chekhov went back in time to talk about buckyballs. they were actually discovered in 2180.
@Ndizzyinthehizzy Also, if a reaction has more than one product, then the balanced version tells you how much of each you're going to get. If a particular reaction *can't* be balanced, then it means the reaction is impossible. Finally, (and this is just a theory) the number of molecules that take part in a chemical reaction is important, because they all have to meet at the same place and time -- so more molecules required for a reaction means less reactions per second, so it'll go slower.
I didn't know you could hide things inside buckyballs, that's the coolest thing ever!
Did that ultrasonic bath thingy cause static in the camera or was it just loud?
Well, you can't really take visible light pictures of atoms because they're smaller than the wavelength of visible light, and in any case, atoms don't really look anything like the models. Models of atoms and molecules are more like a simplified way of describing the chemical and physical properties rather than a zoomed in version of what they actually look like. You can totally find pictures of atoms, though. Start by googling "atom electron microscope" and look at the pictures.
There is info on net that C60 molecule is also the most massive and complex object for which wave-particle duality was observed.
When the guy in the lab coat says "so I got two beakers" he picked up two Erlenmeyer flasks. Perhaps a bit misleading but then I noticed he makes the same mistake again @ 4:38 .
@seahawk124 Nice to see someone contributing when they see a problem as opposed to pointing it out and expecting someone else to fix it.
i think i have seen somthing about H2O@C60 before
I had the chance to meet Dr. Kroto, amazing guy!
Fuller is credited for the " geodesic structure " Magic Kingdom Florida's centre piece is the geodesic dome
I'm a bit disappointed you didn't explain where the name Buckminsterfullerene comes from or told us about the man it's named after.
Richard Buckminster Fuller was one of the greatest engineers and architects of the second half of the 20th Century. His geodesic dome forms are still being used in today's architecture (e.g. Edam Project) and it is one of the rare occasions where nature & chemistry is influencing the forms of our buildings.
Wow at 1:25! Doesn't Pete look young and handsome?
I'm always surprised to see how empty the labs are in these videos. Are the videos shot at some time of day when the labs aren't usually in use?
The @ sign is called an 'attum'
(In case anyone wanted to know)
I want one of those C60 molecules
were can you get B-fulurine? (C60)
Will c60 filled with helium float?
I like how the chemist says, "...to save time I'm going to use Ultra-Sonic Bath" so nonchalantly.
I can imagine him saying "To clear forest, I'm going to use Nuclear device" or "To disperse protesters, I'm going to use Death-ray" in the same manner.
"To thicken hair volume, I'm going to use Incinerator oven."
The Light of Other Days, by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter, explore the uses of these very same Bucky balls.
Wish they would talk about it's use in analytical chemistry particularly in surface science. Cause they actually use it a lot like a ball.
@Ndizzyinthehizzy Take the formation of water (unbalanced) as an example:
1. H2 + O2 --> H2O
Compared to the correctly balanced version:
2. 2H2 + O2 --> 2H2O
The correctly balanced version tells that we need twice as much hydrogen as oxygen to make the reaction happen, and we'll get the same number of water molecules at the end as hydrogen when we started. This is pretty important in an industrial setting; an unbalanced equation is like a (cooking) recipe without quantities.
Thanks for putting the names on the pic.. I couldn't quite tell which one was The Prof.
how was it discovered spectroscopically?what i mean is,normally,when an element is excited,it produces light of a unique frequency,with which we detect it.but how was c60 discovered.does that mean that behavior of electrons in c60 is different,moreover unique?please answer,i am confused
I have a weird conception about solvents (I haven't yet learned further than acid anhydrous something (e.g. CO2 or SO3)) So basically I remember a publication about adding hydrogen to graphene making graphane (I really hope i don't say the wrong names here) which makes transformation in it's bonds structure and for each carbon atom there's an hydrogen. So like that, can something be done with C60 without destroying it's structure, and making it an solvent? Or changes due to hydrogen bonds?
Could you fit enough hydrogen or helium inside a fullerene to make it lighter than air?
dam professor, were you born old or something? your like the principal from back to the future. always lookin old
Awesome video of an awesome molecule, but I have one question:
Do they use the @ sign when talking about hemoglobin in blood aswell?
"Soccer" is just a change to the original word "Assoc", which was the name of the FOOTBALL association, made by a group of clubs in the UK.
Football always has been the correct term, and always will be. I have not conducted any further research into why the americans would "Steal" the name, but i'm guessing that since america started off as a british colony, and since, changed the rules, but kept the name ( football )
This sounds very interesting! I think I'm going to try to make+isolate some fullerene myself :D
if he would been my chemistry teacher i whould have become a chemist 4 sure i find it very very a interesting and mindteasing to watch ur videos ty 4 making them
LOL @ the microphone freaking out with the ultrasound bath machine
Is He@C60 neutrally buoyant or is it just a lighter form, and would there be any way of using that in the same way we use carbon nanotubes-fiber? Also is there any application for the use of C60 in smelting?
My main memory of my last year of school was so many of my teachers complaining about how limited they were by the curriculum and how a lot of it was completely pointless to learn and shouldn't be on the exams.
I'm not sure if the carbon really "wants" to bond in a C70 molecule. Though I'm not very experienced in that, my focus is more on hydrocarbon structures in organic chemistry and a fullerene is pure carbon. Personally I'd say that it's probably possible, though I'm not really aware of how it would be done practically.
I don't know about superconductors getting any benefit, but creating large molecules and using temperature to change the overall size to "Weave" other molecules could be nifty. Do what nature does.
Thank you for pointing that out. However would that mean the N60 would harder to make?
Hey, I wonder if I can get a SRB only rocket to the Mun and back? (Commence ~1000 m/s impact on the Mun's surface)
@seahawk124 do you mean the Eden Project? Or is there some cheese research going on I don't know about ;P
@periodicvideos What was the guy saying c60 does when under pressure? i didnt hear it well due to his accent.
The scientist doing the experiment has the best accent ever.
Your right tests don't prove you have an understanding but time and time again it seems that when you have confidence you know and understand a subject the less you understand it generally no more so then if you were only doing tests the real way to educate is not to teach but to let them learn
I swear I've seen that coffee cup on another professor's desks in other documentaries ;)
Is there a use for putting an atom inside a buckyball?
@derick1259 Not almost 2 years ago. Fred was one when I originally posted my comment. Him being number one doesn't anger me as much as Fred, not nearly. He actually had a good idea, and profited off of it. I do still wish something informative was up there.
@periodicvideos Now we just need a nanotubes video with Andrei Khlobystov :)
I would, however, be curious as to the thoroughness of the study: the number of test subjects, the credibility of the institution conducting the test, and other pertainent factors. I probably should have looked into the citations and references rather than being lazy and skipping on to other things, but yes, I too am curious as to the possibilities.
lmao
"To shave crotch, I'm going to use particle disintegrator."
The name is quite sci-fi but it is as simple as shaving the crotch...
? neither was credit given to the erlen meyer...
He gets lots of credit, this video is about the great aspects of fullerens. You really expect them to credit this or that person explicitely in every video (because every video shows something that someone discovered).
At the end the guy even says 'we should be gratefull for fuller that...' so you got your credits...
I love how his cup has a disclaimer.
At the beginning, "Last week, the Google logo looked really strange. It had a molecule in the shape of a football in the middle of it." Thats what I was meaning.
what was special was that the logo was a full javascript/css 3D animation , which is absolutely bonkers insane
Where is the 2nd scientist from? His accent is quite interesting.
well in the C60 Molecule, you'll notice that each Carbon is only bonded to 3 others, so one must be a double bond.
Where can i get the model of C60 at 1:00?
There was no credit given to Buckminster Fuller in this video. I mean the structure is actually named after the guy. Give him some credit! Otherwise great video.
Just an FYI for those in the US....what we call "soccer," a lot of the rest of the world calls "football."
I wonder how did he remove the marker cap
1:20
"The Professor" ...
that epithet reminds me of certain cartoons XD
World's Best Advisor!?
Maybe a great nano-tech device for He @ C60...
Can you put atoms inside C70, or even molecules like NaCl or HF (salts, ect...)?
I have one question, if anyone could answer or help me out, I would greatly appreciate it. I always see these awesome diagrams and hear these really interesting videos about atoms but have never seen an actual picture of one. Why is that? The have these little balls and sticks representing the atoms and describe them but how do they know? I have been trying to find actual pictures of atoms. We can see stars and nebulas, distant galaxies and planets, but why not atoms. Can anyone help me?
Great video.
@myshowTM
it is.
I wanted to know what @ means
I have always wondered, what is the point of balancing equations?
maybe you could use it as a ball bearing of sorts for nano-type of mechanics...
um, it shows 3 bonds per molecule, but carbon has 4 bonding points. So how does it stably from the bucky ball without hydrogen or oxygen atoms.
Wow, Has Pete Licence changed his last name? Did he used to be called Griffin?