World is more dangerous because of the people like this. Her role in UN was disgusting during Palestine issue. She was the only one endorsed a genocide. How dare she is talking about the genocide in Rwanda while encouraging another one.
countryboy Why not talk about rwanda? The world seems to only have sympathy for light skinned people. We see it. We're all people and if you can't have the same level of compassion and outrage, don't expect everyone to jump on your bandwagon. A life is a life
00:01 Linda is a survivor of the Genocide against Tutsi just because she looked TUTSI to the perpetrators,the same perpetrators (FDLR)killing in DRC,but the US never talk about them
Amb. Greenfield is mistaken. I am 58, lived in a half dozen different languages, speak a half dozen foreign languages fluently (guess what i do for a living): the world is far far less dangerous than in the 1970s or 1980s.
@QuizmasterLaw Sophisticated weapons can be cobbled together with off the shelf components from Amazon or Alibaba. That is just one of the reasons the world is more dangerous now. The rest, I won't even bother to try and explain.
Con mucho respeto para Linda, me atrevo a decir que ahora el mundo es más peligroso que antes. Porque ahora las armas son más peligrosas, más tecnificadas, más rápidas y con mayor alcance y menos refugios
We sre asking thenwrong questions. The world wil always be dangereɓñous. The question should be "Are we doing everything in out power to stregthen ourselves against the trials*?
We don't want more policy-makers who just talk talk and don't implement any solution! It is a joke to get a senior position at an international organization just because you faced one time a life treating moment, like what about the people that face these situations every week? Those are the ones not crying and talking to the press
I am sorry but that young man whou didnt shoot her and then days later called her "friend", that must have been a psychopath right? how is that possible that behaviour, a killer who acts like that a few days later
Why bother interviewing western/european leaders? Everything coming out of their mouth is FLUFF! African and asian leaders are more straightforward and direct with their answers...
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Double standards and hypocrisy
The Chair Lady of UN Veto
World is more dangerous because of the people like this. Her role in UN was disgusting during Palestine issue. She was the only one endorsed a genocide. How dare she is talking about the genocide in Rwanda while encouraging another one.
The Rwandan genocide was one of the greatest losses of life from a civil war/conflict in the 20st century, so there's that.
What's the purpose for UN
countryboy
Why not talk about rwanda? The world seems to only have sympathy for light skinned people. We see it. We're all people and if you can't have the same level of compassion and outrage, don't expect everyone to jump on your bandwagon. A life is a life
@@Scoring57What I meant was she has no right to talk about another genocide while endorsing one.
she even hates Rwanda.
The hand that provided cover for a Genocide.
00:01 Linda is a survivor of the Genocide against Tutsi just because she looked TUTSI to the perpetrators,the same perpetrators (FDLR)killing in DRC,but the US never talk about them
Americans are so oblivious.
All of us?
@@pinoygal6232 Even if they weren't, would there be any path of improvement? With citizens united you all may as well stay oblivious.
This woman is demonic.
Criminal
And she veto NO for ceasefire in Gaza. Complicit in genocide there.
Can we say then a genocide survivor is taking part of another!!!! What predicament!!!
Amb. Greenfield is mistaken. I am 58, lived in a half dozen different languages, speak a half dozen foreign languages fluently (guess what i do for a living): the world is far far less dangerous than in the 1970s or 1980s.
@QuizmasterLaw Sophisticated weapons can be cobbled together with off the shelf components from Amazon or Alibaba. That is just one of the reasons the world is more dangerous now. The rest, I won't even bother to try and explain.
I haven’t watched this video, but if we keep dancing to the rhythm of the fettle of the powers that be the world will continue to get dangerous
America's reputation has taken a hit during current administration, not the previous one
Con mucho respeto para Linda, me atrevo a decir que ahora el mundo es más peligroso que antes. Porque ahora las armas son más peligrosas, más tecnificadas, más rápidas y con mayor alcance y menos refugios
Arrogant hypocrites.
We sre asking thenwrong questions. The world wil always be dangereɓñous. The question should be "Are we doing everything in out power to stregthen ourselves against the trials*?
Memo: Ghumbo-Diplomacy
We don't want more policy-makers who just talk talk and don't implement any solution! It is a joke to get a senior position at an international organization just because you faced one time a life treating moment, like what about the people that face these situations every week? Those are the ones not crying and talking to the press
Is this shameless woman raising her hand at the UN?
I don't know much about it but I'm sure world doesn't know anything
9:04 they get into gaza
I am sorry but that young man whou didnt shoot her and then days later called her "friend", that must have been a psychopath right? how is that possible that behaviour, a killer who acts like that a few days later
Excellent reporting, excellent!
Tracey Morgan is looking rough these days...
Genocide supporter!
point a to point c? 🤨
A cold blood murderer
How can anyone trust a word she says? Come on she is LYING
This SNAKE
🤔 ADESDOLARIZAÇÃO - BRICS - 🇧🇷🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇿🇦
double stadards very biased
It is more dangerous under Democrat Policies!
Why bother interviewing western/european leaders?
Everything coming out of their mouth is FLUFF!
African and asian leaders are more straightforward and direct with their answers...
😂
Criminal