Thanks. This puts to rest the anarchy question, that he's NOT an anarchist, although he feels that pure nonviolent anarchy is an idealized form of society.
I didn't hear anything about anarchism. Neither of them talked about opposing hierarchies, capitalism, etc. "Ron Paul on anti-statism" would be a more accurate title. Anarchism is much more than just anti-statism.
chbrules There's more than enough food to feed everyone on the planet (look that up if you don't believe me). There are more houses than homeless people. Capitalism creates artificial scarcity and causes many to die unnecessarily.
+Anarcho Communist dam those capitalists drinking up all the earth's 1% of the drinkable water! forget purification, transportation, structure... inb4 the we need a consensus * looks at flint"
Yep: conza.tumblr.com/tagged/rpvoluntarist , he's said similar things previously. I'd suggest labeling it as "anarchism" is a bit of a misnomer though (although that's what it is), he would reject the term if you had asked it like that. As would Mises (conza.tumblr.com/post/73003559557/mises-on-minarchism), and myself. In any case, great work Nate :D
+Anarcho Communist Proudhon would say YOU aren't an Anarchist, since you are a Communist and not a Mutualist - so if you want to get technical, at least be correct..
Thanks. This puts to rest the anarchy question, that he's NOT an anarchist, although he feels that pure nonviolent anarchy is an idealized form of society.
he's totally a closet anarchist
Paul for president
He is for it, but he knows realistically, it won't happen in one day.
I love that man.
This man should have been president
I didn't hear anything about anarchism. Neither of them talked about opposing hierarchies, capitalism, etc. "Ron Paul on anti-statism" would be a more accurate title. Anarchism is much more than just anti-statism.
+Anarcho Communist Sorry, Anarchism refers to more than the far left ultra-violence you support
chbrules
"Without rulers" includes economic rulers, i.e., capitalists.
chbrules
It's not voluntary when the alternative is homelessness and starvation.
chbrules There's more than enough food to feed everyone on the planet (look that up if you don't believe me). There are more houses than homeless people. Capitalism creates artificial scarcity and causes many to die unnecessarily.
+Anarcho Communist dam those capitalists drinking up all the earth's 1% of the drinkable water! forget purification, transportation, structure... inb4 the we need a consensus * looks at flint"
Yep: conza.tumblr.com/tagged/rpvoluntarist , he's said similar things previously. I'd suggest labeling it as "anarchism" is a bit of a misnomer though (although that's what it is), he would reject the term if you had asked it like that. As would Mises (conza.tumblr.com/post/73003559557/mises-on-minarchism), and myself. In any case, great work Nate :D
+Conza88 He's pro-capitalist, though, so he wouldn't be an anarchist even if he didn't reject the label.
+Anarcho Communist Proudhon would say YOU aren't an Anarchist, since you are a Communist and not a Mutualist - so if you want to get technical, at least be correct..
Any Rand fanboy libertarians... Individualism vs collectivism. Anarchist syndicates are Much more viable.