Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis in Abaqus part 2: Implicit vs Explicit

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лип 2022
  • Our telegram channel for Abaqus and Q & A: t.me/abaqus_asist
    Our LinkedIn page: / femexir
    If you want to be informed about our 50% discount codes and other announcements, join our Telegram channel or follow us in LinkedIn.
    Contact info for using our services:
    mirzabozorg71@gmail.com
    Comprehensive Abaqus Package: • Comprehensive Abaqus P...
    Including 39 hours of step-by-step tutorials.
    Step by step tutorials to do the impact analysis, quasi static analysis via dynamic steps and introducing ductile damage to the model:
    • Impact Simulation of C...
    • Static and Quasi-Stati...
    • Damage Analysis of Not...
    Don’t hesitate to ask any questions you might have about the explanations presented in this video using the comments below. We try to answer all questions regarding the video details in the comments below.
    Address of the first part of this tutorial:
    • Nonlinear Dynamic Anal...
    Dynamic implicit step is the only step of Abaqus/Standard solver which can be used to solve nonlinear dynamic problems.
    In this tutorial, we will compare the results obtained by dynamic implicit and dynamic explicit steps.
    Also the settings of the dynamic implicit step will be discussed in detail.
    One of the most important issues in the post processing of the nonlinear dynamic problems is
    the way of applying filter on the results to remove the numerical noise for better understanding and interpreting of the results.
    In this tutorial, the Butterworth filter is used to filter the reaction force curve.
    table of content:
    - Steps for conducting nonlinear analysis in Abaqus
    - Dynamic implicit step settings
    - Solving the problem using dynamic implicit step
    - Comparison of stress contours
    - Comparing dynamic explicit and dynamic implicit results
    - Applying filter to the results
    - Comparison of filtered and unfiltered results
    #Abaqus
    #explicit
    #implicit
    #dynamic_implicit
    #dynamic
    #dynamic_step
    #dynamic_explicit
    #Impact
    #Impact_analysis
    #nonlinear_analysis
    #nonilnear_dynamic_analysis
    #filter
    #abaqus_filter
    #butterworth_filter

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @hosseinmohammadtaheri1688
    @hosseinmohammadtaheri1688 Рік тому +1

    I appreciate your effort to make this presentation, these videos for the nonlinear analyses are great and helpful to realize when it is better to use implicit or explicit method!

  • @yisehakg5039
    @yisehakg5039 Рік тому +1

    Superb thanks for the detailed presentation.

  • @farzanehabedini5723
    @farzanehabedini5723 Рік тому +1

    Hi, Thanks for the video. I have a contact between a soft shell and a stiffer beam. when I check the data of acceleration on the surface of contact (on both parts), I find lots of high peaks and chattering. Do you know how can I solve it (dynamic implicit) ? I do not want to filter the results as you explained in the video.

    • @FemexIran
      @FemexIran  Рік тому +1

      Hi.
      In solving the contact interaction, chattering is an inevitable phenomenon. But there must not be too much chattering. Maybe you must refine the mesh in the contacting regions or even change the element type. To give more accurate solutions or suggestions, you can use our online consultancy service. In this service first I check your model to find out the mistakes. To use our online service, please send an email to me: mirzabozorg71@gmail.com

  • @vz12938
    @vz12938 Рік тому +1

    Could you briefly explain in comment how to give sinusoidal loading (Fmin=100N, Fmax=1000N, frequency-0.02Hz) in dynamic implicit solver. Please help

    • @FemexIran
      @FemexIran  Рік тому

      Hi.
      To use our consultancy service, please send an email to me.
      Mirzabozorg71@gmail.com

    • @vz12938
      @vz12938 Рік тому

      @@FemexIran I did! Please check

    • @FemexIran
      @FemexIran  Рік тому

      @@vz12938 Yes you sent me one email and I answered it. You didn't send email again.