CHEATING!!! That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you can form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
@@austingtir If it is cheating, I am sure world rugby will find a rule to stop such moves in the future Currently it seems there is no rule against it and for now it is allowed Sorry for teams who didn't think to make use of something like this
@@louisvanderwalt716 Its already illegal you utter muppet!! The 2011 AB WC team already did this move when Woodcock scored his try except they did it LEGALLY with one runner coming through THATS HOW ITS DONE LEGALLY!. The way the boks did it is blatant cheating because they had to know it was potentially illegal when they practiced it.
Its an illegal maul/flyingwedge: Southafrica setup a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. It doesnt matter if its advancing or not its an illegal maul and a flying wedge. The key point is the lineout is over the moment the ball passes from the first lineout jumper back to etzebeth EVERY SINGLE THING THEY DID FROM THERE IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
@@austingtir you obviously know the rules of rugby I don’t… it just looked cool to me…. I suppose when the ball goes back to Etze as long as it’s not going forward a maul can be formed no? I don’t mate you seem to know more 👍🏼
@@rodericksmith9675 When the ball goes back to Etze the LINEOUT IS FINISHED. Which means you cant just randomly form a maul out of nothing. To form a maul an australian player has to be involved. They didnt turn up until there were 4 or 5 saffas already bound together = illegal maul and a flyin wedge once the Aussies touched it. If you want to see this move done legally watch the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores. Theres nobody else involved just woodcock running through. Thats how you do it legally. There is a way you can do the bok move kinda legally but as said an australian has to be bound before the other saffa players are which in a lineout situation IMO is nigh on impossible but there would still be question marks in my mind over lifting a guy in a maul either way because the lineout is finished.
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Siya in France was like when parents say their child isn’t dumb, he’s so smart that he’s just bored in school. He’s barely back in SA and immediately back in this insane shape 😅
Dont need too what they did is completely illegal: That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Its is already that lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Its an illegal maul/flyingwedge: Southafrica setup a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. It doesnt matter if its advancing or not its an illegal maul and a flying wedge. The key point is the lineout is over the moment the ball passes from the first lineout jumper back to etzebeth EVERY SINGLE THING THEY DID FROM THERE IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
@@austingtir Ref didn't see it that way. Assistant refs didn't see it that way. TMO didn't see it that way. Afterwards, whatever bodies and entities in World Rugby exists to check and comment on these matters didn't see it that way, since Duane Vermeulen said that they haven't received any word from World Rugby about it. So maybe call up World Rugby, tell them your credentials - I'm sure that your UA-cam comments and your experience at playing Rigby at school level qualifies your opinion - and have them make a statement in order to end this farce, this outrage, this travesty once and for all!
@@randomlyfactual1943 We all know the officiating and WR is inept. Thats part of the point im making actually. The boks got away with it. But everyone deep down knows something was off with that play because every team in the world would be doing this if it was legal which it clearly is NOT!!!!! BTW: if you want to see that play done LEGALLY watch the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scored...... And then look at the difference to what the boks did here.
@@randomlyfactual1943 Well thats what makes this even worse because Rassie and co had to know they were potentially cheating when they allowed them to practice this. Because they had to of practiced this. They did it twice in that game!!
Its already illegal its an illegal maul and flying wedge: Southafrica setup a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. It doesnt matter if its advancing or not its an illegal maul and a flying wedge. The key point is the lineout is over the moment the ball passes from the first lineout jumper back to etzebeth EVERY SINGLE THING THEY DID FROM THERE IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
That lineout to maul move was already completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Rassie is the second most influential man in the history of South African Rugby, only surpassed by Dannie Craven. He knows how to push the laws to the limit (and just on the field) how to creat new moves, and how to build a team to reach its peak at the right time. But against the Wallabies the win has to be put in prospective, that is a new look Wallaby team rebuilding from the bottom up. Rugby in Australia is competing with plenty of other sports, and this shows in the greater sporting environment, with Australia’s Olympic success as compared to South Africa’s Olympic results Now all Australia has to do is attach New Zealand as a state of Australia and that would just about fill in the missing gaps.
@@Rotowhaka Its an illegal maul/flyingwedge: Southafrica setup a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. It doesnt matter if its advancing or not its an illegal maul and a flying wedge. The key point is the lineout is over the moment the ball passes from the first lineout jumper back to etzebeth EVERY SINGLE THING THEY DID FROM THERE IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
The teabag in 2011 was LEGAL this was not: Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Question, how many player-lifts can you then do? If it takes 3 players to do one, a team can have four of those lifts after each other, leaving 3 players on the ground... lol would be an absolutely aw moment if Rassie does that lol...
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
They dont need too its already illegal: Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
A few years ago a European sports commentator, can't remember his name said something about South American football players ,esp Argentine players to be cheaters and that they do not obey or rather follow the rules of the game and their unsportsman like behavior is frowned upon by Europeans ,aka cheating ,fouling and sometimes causing fights on the field, etc. I see that behavior mistakenly attributed to the Springboks as well. What the Europeans fail to grasp is that rugby is a contact sport with less rigged rules or should I say minimum rules on the field , coming from multicultural diverse background, bring all our energy into the game and give 100% heart and soul . This thing of rigged rules kills the spirit of the game. Yes, we play by the rules ,we abide by the rules and sometimes BEND the rules to test not our opposition but the people who make the rules. I think from now on IRB will have a separate LAW TEXT BOOK just for the Springboks. Watch this space.
You got a video of it because the way the boks did it above is completely illegal!!!! Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
@mrriaanm the original commentator was chanelling his inner-Matt-Williams-pundit-bad-coach-who-never-achieved-anything! (I have grandchildren, you have to explain everything to them 😁)
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Its a flying wedge/Illegal maul and should of been a penalty to Australia. The moment they pass the ball back to the other lineout forward thats not a lineout anymore and it didnt even become a maul either because no Australian player was part of forming that mass of bodies. The moment the australians touch it which they DID thats a penalty to Australia. EVERYBODY missed this!!! They are BLATANTLY CHEATING!!!! Because they had to of practiced this move (they did it twice in this game) and must know if the australians touch them its a penalty to Australia provided an australian didnt join while the first players were forming that "maul" (it wasnt a maul and it wasnt a lineout anymore). Slow the video down to .25 and watch between .2 and .3 seconds when etzebeth catches the ball theres 4 southafrican players already bound to him you cant do that because its not a maul!!!!! (YOU CANT CREATE MAULS OUT OF NOTHING AFTER THE LINEOUT WITH NO AUSTRALIAN PLAYERS INVOLVED) and its not a lineout anymore either!!! so it becomes an illegal flying wedge!!!!
@@hype_reels Not incorrect. That is a flying wedge all day long. Every team in the word would be doing this if it was legal. Watch the AB's do a move similar to this in the 2011 WC final on the french for woodcocks try. THAT IS HOW YOU DO THIS MOVE LEGALLY!!! One player coming through. Not setting up an illegal maul = FLYING WEDGE!!!! For the boks try to be legal Etzebeth had to come down touch the ground then those players release him an Australian player join and create a maul and then the saffa players can join and make that a rolling maul. THAT DIDNT HAPPEN!!! And im not even sure that Etzebeth being lifted like that after the lineout was finished is legal theres probably another rule that covers that bullshit too. Do you guys understand how stupid what you are saying is? Teams could just endlessly lift guys at either end like that and the opposition cant tackle the lifted lineout guy (again its not a lineout anymore once the ball is passed). Its completely retarded!!!
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Matt Walsh and John Kirwan going to approach the International Court of Justice over this.😂
And probably going to the UN Human Rights Commission as well😮
😂😂😂😂 Yu got me rolling on the floor
😅😅😅especially dingbat Matt !
😂🤣🤣🤣
A variation of this double lineout move was executed in a NPC game hours before this game, took place.
Wow, to make a move like that 😮 Brilliant by the coaches 🇿🇦💥
CHEATING!!! That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you can form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
@@austingtir If it is cheating, I am sure world rugby will find a rule to stop such moves in the future Currently it seems there is no rule against it and for now it is allowed
Sorry for teams who didn't think to make use of something like this
@@louisvanderwalt716 Its already illegal you utter muppet!! The 2011 AB WC team already did this move when Woodcock scored his try except they did it LEGALLY with one runner coming through THATS HOW ITS DONE LEGALLY!. The way the boks did it is blatant cheating because they had to know it was potentially illegal when they practiced it.
@@austingtir the tears of a manchild are so sweet after defeat, continue crying and australia will continue to embarrass themselves
This can only be Rassieball ! 😮😊
Its an illegal maul/flyingwedge: Southafrica setup a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. It doesnt matter if its advancing or not its an illegal maul and a flying wedge. The key point is the lineout is over the moment the ball passes from the first lineout jumper back to etzebeth EVERY SINGLE THING THEY DID FROM THERE IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
You can hear the crowd has this ever been done before? Great stuff boks
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
@@austingtir you obviously know the rules of rugby I don’t… it just looked cool to me…. I suppose when the ball goes back to Etze as long as it’s not going forward a maul can be formed no? I don’t mate you seem to know more 👍🏼
@@rodericksmith9675 When the ball goes back to Etze the LINEOUT IS FINISHED. Which means you cant just randomly form a maul out of nothing. To form a maul an australian player has to be involved. They didnt turn up until there were 4 or 5 saffas already bound together = illegal maul and a flyin wedge once the Aussies touched it. If you want to see this move done legally watch the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores. Theres nobody else involved just woodcock running through. Thats how you do it legally. There is a way you can do the bok move kinda legally but as said an australian has to be bound before the other saffa players are which in a lineout situation IMO is nigh on impossible but there would still be question marks in my mind over lifting a guy in a maul either way because the lineout is finished.
@@austingtir you are really good know your stuff mate 👍🏼
That lineout was insane! Rassie and his Springboks will never see heaven after this😂😂
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Siya in France was like when parents say their child isn’t dumb, he’s so smart that he’s just bored in school. He’s barely back in SA and immediately back in this insane shape 😅
They will once again change the rules because we just can’t have the springboks doing that now, right?
Dont need too what they did is completely illegal: That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Banned next year
So what ? Take another look and see how much the new scrumming laws mean !
Its is already that lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Springboks Showing some Olympic Volleyball down under.
WHAT!!!!!
"Can I order the Kolisi with ball, with a side of Bongi?"
"And yeah, I would like that done in the Dixon/Etzebeth way"
Its an illegal maul/flyingwedge: Southafrica setup a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. It doesnt matter if its advancing or not its an illegal maul and a flying wedge. The key point is the lineout is over the moment the ball passes from the first lineout jumper back to etzebeth EVERY SINGLE THING THEY DID FROM THERE IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
@@austingtir Ref didn't see it that way. Assistant refs didn't see it that way. TMO didn't see it that way. Afterwards, whatever bodies and entities in World Rugby exists to check and comment on these matters didn't see it that way, since Duane Vermeulen said that they haven't received any word from World Rugby about it.
So maybe call up World Rugby, tell them your credentials - I'm sure that your UA-cam comments and your experience at playing Rigby at school level qualifies your opinion - and have them make a statement in order to end this farce, this outrage, this travesty once and for all!
@@randomlyfactual1943 We all know the officiating and WR is inept. Thats part of the point im making actually. The boks got away with it. But everyone deep down knows something was off with that play because every team in the world would be doing this if it was legal which it clearly is NOT!!!!! BTW: if you want to see that play done LEGALLY watch the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scored...... And then look at the difference to what the boks did here.
@@austingtir Because this "everybody" never coached, never reffed and probably never played.
@@randomlyfactual1943 Well thats what makes this even worse because Rassie and co had to know they were potentially cheating when they allowed them to practice this. Because they had to of practiced this. They did it twice in that game!!
Waiting for Matt to cry about this so that world Rugby can ban it
another split he is now going to complain about, because dads will try and pass their 1 year olds like that to one another.
brilliant- simply brilliant
@@jonathandavis8599brilliant
Its already illegal its an illegal maul and flying wedge: Southafrica setup a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. It doesnt matter if its advancing or not its an illegal maul and a flying wedge. The key point is the lineout is over the moment the ball passes from the first lineout jumper back to etzebeth EVERY SINGLE THING THEY DID FROM THERE IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
IRB to ban this move 😂😂😂
That lineout to maul move was already completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
@@austingtir Who said it...“If it doesn't challenge you, it won't change you.”
I am not a fan of Rassie Erasmus at all, but that was quite brilliant. Exceptionally brilliant!
Rassie is the second most influential man in the history of South African Rugby, only surpassed by Dannie Craven.
He knows how to push the laws to the limit (and just on the field) how to creat new moves, and how to build a team to reach its peak at the right time.
But against the Wallabies the win has to be put in prospective, that is a new look Wallaby team rebuilding from the bottom up.
Rugby in Australia is competing with plenty of other sports, and this shows in the greater sporting environment, with Australia’s Olympic success as compared to South Africa’s Olympic results
Now all Australia has to do is attach New Zealand as a state of Australia and that would just about fill in the missing gaps.
@@Rotowhaka Its an illegal maul/flyingwedge: Southafrica setup a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. It doesnt matter if its advancing or not its an illegal maul and a flying wedge. The key point is the lineout is over the moment the ball passes from the first lineout jumper back to etzebeth EVERY SINGLE THING THEY DID FROM THERE IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
The moment South Africans let out a collective "WaddeFOK?!"
They weren't done yet. Watch the line out of the final game against Argentina.
That is the most amazing Lineout innovation I've seen, absolutely brilliant by the Boks. Even beats "Teabag" from the 2011 RWC final...
The teabag in 2011 was LEGAL this was not: Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
And what say your French Fries... Is Our Boy To Fat for league... Hello we wasted you in the 🗺 world cup 🥤
😂😂😂👍🏼
French fries😅😅😅😅
Question, how many player-lifts can you then do? If it takes 3 players to do one, a team can have four of those lifts after each other, leaving 3 players on the ground... lol would be an absolutely aw moment if Rassie does that lol...
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
WR rule change coming soon😅
They dont need too its already illegal: Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
A few years ago a European sports commentator, can't remember his name said something about South American football players ,esp Argentine players to be cheaters and that they do not obey or rather follow the rules of the game and their unsportsman like behavior is frowned upon by Europeans ,aka cheating ,fouling and sometimes causing fights on the field, etc. I see that behavior mistakenly attributed to the Springboks as well.
What the Europeans fail to grasp is that rugby is a contact sport with less rigged rules or should I say minimum rules on the field , coming from multicultural diverse background, bring all our energy into the game and give 100% heart and soul . This thing of rigged rules kills the spirit of the game. Yes, we play by the rules ,we abide by the rules and sometimes BEND the rules to test not our opposition but the people who make the rules. I think from now on IRB will have a separate LAW TEXT BOOK just for the Springboks. Watch this space.
For the crimes commited againts humanity 😂
A variation of this double lineout move was executed in a NPC game hours before this game took place.
You got a video of it because the way the boks did it above is completely illegal!!!! Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
It’s an immoral move - totally against the spirit of the game. 😢😢😢😢😂😂😂😂😂
Why?
Being sarcastic
@@MrRiaanmwooooosh
@mrriaanm the original commentator was chanelling his inner-Matt-Williams-pundit-bad-coach-who-never-achieved-anything!
(I have grandchildren, you have to explain everything to them 😁)
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
Its a flying wedge/Illegal maul and should of been a penalty to Australia. The moment they pass the ball back to the other lineout forward thats not a lineout anymore and it didnt even become a maul either because no Australian player was part of forming that mass of bodies. The moment the australians touch it which they DID thats a penalty to Australia. EVERYBODY missed this!!! They are BLATANTLY CHEATING!!!! Because they had to of practiced this move (they did it twice in this game) and must know if the australians touch them its a penalty to Australia provided an australian didnt join while the first players were forming that "maul" (it wasnt a maul and it wasnt a lineout anymore). Slow the video down to .25 and watch between .2 and .3 seconds when etzebeth catches the ball theres 4 southafrican players already bound to him you cant do that because its not a maul!!!!! (YOU CANT CREATE MAULS OUT OF NOTHING AFTER THE LINEOUT WITH NO AUSTRALIAN PLAYERS INVOLVED) and its not a lineout anymore either!!! so it becomes an illegal flying wedge!!!!
Jy weet nie wat ons weet nie.
Incorrect
@@revampmyself6669 I know you're fking cheats!!
@@hype_reels Not incorrect. That is a flying wedge all day long. Every team in the word would be doing this if it was legal. Watch the AB's do a move similar to this in the 2011 WC final on the french for woodcocks try. THAT IS HOW YOU DO THIS MOVE LEGALLY!!! One player coming through. Not setting up an illegal maul = FLYING WEDGE!!!! For the boks try to be legal Etzebeth had to come down touch the ground then those players release him an Australian player join and create a maul and then the saffa players can join and make that a rolling maul. THAT DIDNT HAPPEN!!! And im not even sure that Etzebeth being lifted like that after the lineout was finished is legal theres probably another rule that covers that bullshit too. Do you guys understand how stupid what you are saying is? Teams could just endlessly lift guys at either end like that and the opposition cant tackle the lifted lineout guy (again its not a lineout anymore once the ball is passed). Its completely retarded!!!
@@austingtir literally nothing wrong with what they did. Learn to Just appreciate creativity ‘& class 🤝
Springboks masterclass
That lineout to maul move was completely illegal. Soon as the ball passes from the first jumper to etzebeth thats not a lineout anymore which means you cant form a maul out of nothing with no australian players involved. So illegal maul and a flying wedge take your pick. If you want to see this move done legally watch the AB's in the 2011 WC final when Woodcock scores.
@@austingtir LOL anything else ?
@@HBH44 Oh, just that we have a chat full of moronic sheep that dont know basic rugby rules.