Enumerative & Abstractive Logic

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @codework-vb6er
    @codework-vb6er 5 днів тому +1

    ❤👍 I've been following your videos releases. These are all very interesting topics.

    • @AmateurLogician
      @AmateurLogician  4 дні тому

      I appreciate that. Thank you, @codework-vb6er! It's great to "see" you.

  • @the_artisan
    @the_artisan 5 днів тому +1

    Very useful, thank you. Can I ask what software and tablet set up you use to make these videos?

    • @AmateurLogician
      @AmateurLogician  4 дні тому +1

      Hi, @the_artisan. For this video I used my iPad and the Notes app. It's a pretty basic setup. Often I use my laptop, as well, especially for videos that utilize PowerPoint.

    • @the_artisan
      @the_artisan 4 дні тому

      @@AmateurLogician thank you

  • @CosMicThunderDOOME
    @CosMicThunderDOOME 6 днів тому +1

    Im deciding to get Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft, Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach 2nd Edition by Douglas Walton, and Fallacy: the Counterfeit of Argument by W. Ward Fearnside and William B. Holther. Do you think these three books are best quality book and should they cover everthing i need? I only care about informal logic, quality, and practicality/only what's needed.
    Also are there any other great quality books about fallacies like Fallacy: the Counterfeit of Argument and Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach 2nd Edition? On your website you said Fallacy: the Counterfeit of Argument was better than most fallacy books and was wondering if you had very good or better fallacy books?

    • @AmateurLogician
      @AmateurLogician  4 дні тому

      @CosMicThunderDOOME, that's a good selection of books. I'm afraid if I add more, it would be too many for your purposes. Still, if you can get a used copy of "The Logic of Real Arguments" by Alec Fisher, that wouldn't be a bad idea. One extra reference won't hurt.
      Note that "Socratic Logic" will have formal logic in it, yet Peter Kreeft keeps things "real," so to speak, with a lot of practical applications and informal logic. So, it's a good choice.
      As far as fallacy books, there are "popular" books that I haven’t yet checked out. There's a text called "The Fallacy Detective," which is approaching 2,000 reviews, mostly positive, on Amazon. I haven't yet picked the book up, though! It's probably decent. ("Fallacies" by C. L. Hamblin is a good reference that surveys the history of fallacies that I do own. But, honestly, I think "Fallacy: the Counterfeit of Argument" is almost as good as it gets.)
      If I may say so myself, I think I put together some decent articles on fallacies at my website: "Formal Fallacies," "Testimony & Unsound Authority," "Informal Fallacies & Language," "Diversion & Relevancy Fallacies," "Presumption Fallacies," and "Causal & Inductive Fallacies."
      See entries 35 and onward at amateurlogician.com/trivium-logic/
      I hope this helps you on your journey! One of the tragedies of modern education is that we've lost the basics of what made up a traditional education --- and that included logic. It should be a "no-brainer" that logic should be a part of any serous education.

    • @CosMicThunderDOOME
      @CosMicThunderDOOME 2 дні тому

      Thanks for the reply. I love traditional/verbal style logic and I to also wish the Trivium were required classes in school.
      Here are some logic book review recommendations:
      Nonsense: Red Herrings, Straw Men and Sacred Cows: How We Abuse Logic in Our Everyday Language by Robert Gula (claims to be the best fallacy book)
      Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy
      The Little Logic Book by Delvin Ratzsch, L. Hardy, and Rebecca Konyndyk DeYoung

    • @AmateurLogician
      @AmateurLogician  День тому

      @@CosMicThunderDOOME, cool! So many books, so little time! Thanks for sharing. Yet I stand by the recommendations I gave. Additional texts are icing on the cake, though there comes a point where there are diminishing returns.
      Also, I think that just reading good philosophy books is a good next step after a fallacy textbook. Why? Because a good philosophy book will help us develop our logical muscles. Through osmosis critical thinking skills increase via good philosophy!
      Anyway, I'm glad to "see" you.