Seen this before, there is no confusion, title is misleading. Don't know what drew the amount of views. He seems really positive and nice though, maybe that's a factor?
Jag tror faktiskt det bara är roligt för rasister. De tycker väl han pratar roligt och att han inte vet vem Leif Loket är eller förstår konceptet med TV4+. Men som du säger så svarar han ju bara på frågor. En helt vanlig människa.
Tydligen var klippet poppis för 20 år sen typ. Kanske folk bara tyckte afrikanen var lite lustig, med sin Dr Alban-accent. Hursomhelst känns rubriken missledande, borde stått "skön afrikan" istället :)
Språk och annat som inte har med hur han ser ut att göra har inget med rasism att göra... Den är knappast rolig men du har fel. Också dåligt att stämpla folk som kan finna detta roligt av andra anledningar för rasister. Sjukt hur folk har tagit meningen ur det ordet, gör det svårare att stoppa och belysa faktisk rasism.
The guy was defended in the original clip and people thought he seemed like a really cool guy, he just had a funny way of answering the questions and back then it was very easy for clips like this to become a meme. I remember people at schools saying "Och så lite ris" as a reference, and everyone was positive towards it. The comments from 8-15 years past call out the interviewer for asking dumb questions and that the clip should be renamed to "Skön snubbe gillar ris" or something like that.
@@JonathanRollinssthlm305Interesting! I just had to find out if I was going mad but no (eller jag skulle ju kunna hålla på och bli galen ändå men inte pga detta) I went back and searched and at the end of the Björn Gustavsson-video you said that the next reaction was Bara Ben by Galenskaparna. I don’t know if it’s your cup of tea but as someone who’ve dabbled in writing I find it a bit funny but mostly impressive.
Yeah his Swedish is just lacking and it sounds maybe a bit funny (because it's odd and unexpected) how he ads rice like that and he's saying something is good when it doesn't sound like it would be or when he doesn't understand/communicate it right. But there wasn't really any confusion...
It’s just about a strange dialect, like yours. The man speaks perfect Swedish, just with an intonation that is a little off. Not a very good suggestion, and a bit rasist.
Jag är nog också en av de tittare som känner mig mer förvirrad än afrikanen. Fattar inte alls det roliga. Men nästa ska jag absolut kolla. Allt med Galenskaparna + After Shave är klassiker!
Yeah. There are different types of humour, this is pretty much laughing ~at~ someone. The only thing that is "funny" is that he isn't good at the language (He is clearly a new learner, he resorts to using "good"). The only thing that actually was sign that he was "confused" was a very short while when he mistook these people saying that Bingolotto had been moved from TV4 to TV4+ and he thought that it was TV4+ that had moved. So. Yeah.. That is humour for people who have a mindset that is based on a world-view that nurtures racism. This is kind of the type of humour that I think about when people talk about the "Superiority" theory of laughter. I personally think that laughter have two ways of arriving; One is a social sign that you aren't harmful. (Like Yawning), which leads to "Nervous laughter" (Which tend to piss angry people off even more, but I think the "tick" to laugh in tense situations is specifically do show that you are not a threat).. or.. Cognitive dissonance where laughter may be a displacement behaviour. The dissonance between "The expected" and "The unexpected", where the actual level of humour depends on a lot of factors, such as.. The distance between the two, and also how late you find out the unexpected, and also whether you had made presumptions and actually "invested" in it (like if you answer a question "in good faith". Of course Laughter is only used as a displacement behaviour if you feel comfortable. I had a teacher that had a seriously sour disposition and once he tried to break the ice with the class by telling a joke. We can blame his monotone voice, and lack of facial expressions to show that it was intended as a joke, but.. We understood, but no one laughed. That is because no one was comfortable in the situation.. It was Awkward.. AND that is actually WHY delivery is so important. A monotone voice versus a friendly one. An actual genuine smile while telling the joke.. Even the pacing.. All of these are supposed to show that you are safe, you can be comfortable. I mention these to explain why I think this joke makes me think a few things. The people who find this funny have to actually.. Either See the "Swedish language" as the expected (at least their own understanding of it)... and.. See the fact that someone struggles as the unexpected. I mean; The struggles were not bad.. and actually feel comfortable enough to laugh. I am not saying that the "Comfort" in itself has to be bad, but if you are in this category and feel comfortable to laugh in someone's face, hang someone out on the internet (without worrying that the person MAY feel humiliated), and try to spread it, etc.. you are still doing harm. I shan't say I haven't (on occasion) kind of giggled a bit at someone making a beginners mistake, but there have always been a bit of a. ."Bless his heart" sensation.. as in "Laughing with him within his struggles". A good example of this is the joke I once heard (presented as a real story, so I don't know), where a farmer had seen his foreign farmhand be chased by the geese (They are big, and hostile.. and hiss when they are angry with someone).. When the farm hand came in he told the farmer "I don't like the cobra-chicken". A beginner doing their best? Absolutely. Good enough?.. Sure.. If anything after I heard this I really want to rename geese to cobra-chickens.. yet.. Funny?.. absolutely giggle-worthy. OR!.. Simply feel comfortable enough to laugh ~at~ this person, due to a sense of disdain and superiority.. Both are built on a racist foundation. The first one isn't in itself direct "ill will", but can be almost as harmless because this is where the people who say "I am not racist" and then vote for the racist party because they think their arguments "makes sense".. Fortunately THAT one can easily be cured if they get more familiar with more people who actually come from other nations. What you don't know, you fear. A lot of people try to say that they aren't racists and try to point as to what they think mean they are racists.. Well.. Some of them are clearly delusional, others are trying to define racist to be so hardcore hate-based that no one can be.. BUT.. some are trying to show the distinction between ill will or not. .BUT.. Racism from hate, Racism from fear, and Racism from ignorance.. are either way a matter of racism.
I mean. Couldn't it simply be that talking a little funny IS funny, regardless of race or whatever. Don't need to laugh at someone to find it funny, Peter Sellers comes to mind. Making race the central topic every time is inventing a problem within itself. Still I mean, someone regardless of who it is who says that everything is good is a little funny, in a good and positive way.
@@treetoon_ .. Ah, yes.. The "Reversal of guilt" instead of discussing the topic. "A little funny".. Well; I suspect you didn't read my post because I didn't object to "A little funny".. "Making race the central topic".. Well. The person who posted the actual clip is the ones who made race the topic.. Or didn't you read the word "African"?.. In this case they even didn't make a claim that "his accent is a bit funny", they said he was "Confused". It's not a judgement on his language, it's a judgement on this person's state of mind.. and.. Everyone gets confused once in a while, which is what is portrayed here. Confused in this case is literally used as a loaded term. Mistakes in communications happen.. sometimes they are "A little funny".. The thing is; Someone without a full grasp of language is something that happens OFTEN.. in real life.. If someone feels the need to penetrate society with repeated clips of every instance. They are trying to send a message. Sellers was a "parody" because he KNEW how to speak properly, this is literally holding individuals out and posting them online. No; This video serves one purpose.. and that is laughter through mockery. Spreading it also send a message to everyone struggling with learning the language: "You are not acceptable".. NOT because someone tries to INVENT humorous situations with ACTUAL misunderstandings and funny situations, but instead through.. Just pointing and laughing.
@@rogerlundstrom6926 That's one way to interpret the situation, one of many ways. Another way is to say that it helps alleviate and rid of racism, because it makes the topic banal. If we can laugh about each others misery, no matter the topic, it encourages and creates solidarity. I don't know what the intention of the person who wrote the title is. Simultaneously, there's a Swedish clip of a bunch of Swedes flying remote airplanes who can't speak English very well which everyone seems to be laughing at freely. From this perspective, is this not the ultimate form of racism? Where it seems some races are being treated differently than others. I'm not the one treating people differently based on their race, I'm treating them the same. You wanna ban all jokes related to race? Fine, but I think it will create more racism as a consequence because the net effect is tip toeing on egg shells and comedy/language censorship.
@@treetoon_ "Another way is to say that it helps alleviate and rid of racism, because it makes the topic banal". I'd say this isn't even a matter of Interpretation. It has never ever worked this way. What you don't seem to get is that there is a HUGE difference between "banter" (which happen between two people who are peers.. IF there is a power-imbalance what is riveting and what is bullying changes).. As I tried to tell in my first reply to you there is a huge difference between whether you laugh at one or..l with them- with more words and more accurately. ~WHEN~ there is an ~actual~ divide and you want to bring people together then making fun of the other on the other side of the divide STRENGTHEN the division. THAT is how this have always worked in history, that is not peers laughing WITH each other.. That is one side kicking down, and the other may try to do the same, but the people who are "comfortable" in the situation who gets told jokes about them that are "kicking up" usually take it really bad. THAT is often what SD is talking about when they talk about how immigrants hate us.. that is when THEY make fun of US!.. and we are NOT taking it on the cheek. The people who vote SD who ever hear an immigrant say ANYTHING less than flattering say "Oh, THIS is how they feel about us, and they want to live in our nation!???".. I know I may be splitting hairs, but it is a small distinction with a HUGE difference. You treat people the same?.. Well.. You are AWARE that UA-cam is a massmedia open for everyone all over the world?.. So... Would you f.ex have reacted the same if you would've seen f.ex. a video on German TV where they filmed a Swedish person being slightly less than perfect in german and they literally made a big deal out of it?.. This is REALLY not even that funny.. He clearly just made one mistake in understanding something, and technically I have made that mistake and I speak and understand Swedish flawlessly, I may just make a slightly different reference so I get it wrong. " is this not the ultimate form of racism? Where it seems some races are being treated differently than others.".. No, it is not. It's called situational awareness and it is a vital skill to have. (I know, I had to learn it as I have Autism, and we do like simple and clear rules)... To say "I do the same to everyone" is NOT how you know "You are treating people equal".. because.. I am 100% sure that if one of your friends said.. "This is hurtful".. you'd apologize, whereas you SEEYou wanna ban all jokes related to race?M to think that for people you do NOT care about you don't have to think: "Am I kicking someone who is already down"?. .I guess I am coming back to actually being able to make distinction between different situations. and I STILL don't think for a second that you seriously would've found it equally "funny" (or acceptable) if the same happened to you. (Heck, you DID seem to at least register, and took a note of he fact that these people laughed at those people you mentioned).. They may literally have BEEN bullies, but you have been primed that you aren't allowed to make distinction between laughter and laughter. We are all victims for the Dunning-Kruger effect. I am 100% sure that you have made some embarrassing flaws in your life, you have probably forgotten them through the process of selective memory.. but.. if you at the first year of college get something SERIOUSLY wrong, and someone chose to put it out on youtube, and instead of saying that this was a beginners error used a different term.. a loaded term.. such as.. "Stupid".. it is in the same wheelhouse as "Confused!" when you know it isn't true. "You wanna ban all jokes related to race?" You are constantly misrepresenting (or lying?) about what I say or imply, and now I can't even think it is in good faith. What you have repeatedly doing is called a "Straw-man argument" (With strong "Black-White fallacy"- or binary thinking as it is called). That is when you reframe/reshape, or possibly even re-invent an argument made.. All three of those are different levels of lying- IF you do so intentionally. You have a narrative; I am not obliged to follow that narrative so don't push me into it- please. I never talked about banning ANYTHING!!!.. I just want to cal a shovel a shovel.. That IS a racist clip that primarily is funny to people who have a tendency to follow narratives that are racial in their nature. Denmark tried to say "Let's the Racists get actual influence in the politics so they are included" and that did NOT solve their racism. Again: I ask you to find ANYTHING that would justify you using the word.. "BAN".. which is a strong word, and outside of it's proper context it IS a lie. then I never said anything about Jokes based on "race" (btw; You are thinking of Ethnicity, but then again the same problem exist with the term "Racism", there is only one human race) not to be allowed.. Or in themselves AUTOMATICALLY being "Racist".. You must have skipped pretty much everything I read in my first comment to even TRY to claim that I was even CLOSE to saying so.. I was talking about whether something was of good will or bad will.. This video.. IS.. mockery.. nothing you have said actually makes it differently.
I’ve never seen this before either🧐 Sometimes a clip becomes very big in a specific community but not outside of that community, maybe thats the case here.. I think some people laugh at both accents and people that they think sound funny for other reasons without thinking that much about it.. So it doesnt necessarily has got to do with him being african in this case. (But then there are people that are racist too of course.)
Jag känner att det är "Intervjuaren" som känns förvirrad (Apropå frågan om att programmet flyttats till TV4+ och att denna man inte förstod frågeställarens korkade fråga
Självförtroende hade han iaf. Om jag pluggat Swahili i 6 månader och får en mikrofon uppkörd i ansiktet om något tv-sprogram så hade det låtit precis lika förvirrande, nej jag tyckte inte det var så roligt, men tagga ned, det är "Fish out of water" som är grejen.
Tipps på svensk humor som går att hitta på UA-cam är "Tack gode gud att du är här!". Improvisationsprogram som urprungligen är Australiensiskt. Avsnittet med Carina Berg till exempel är väldigt roligt.
Han pratar roligt, han är glad och positiv till allt, den tafatta intervjuaren, missförståndet gällande TV4+, och "lite ris!". Det är kul! Han är skön! Jag håller med om att titeln är missvisande dock.
Han var ju bara trevlig och svarade på frågorna. Jag tycker att vi hyllar honom istället! 🤗😃
Seen this before, there is no confusion, title is misleading. Don't know what drew the amount of views. He seems really positive and nice though, maybe that's a factor?
Jag är också förvirrad, förstår inte vad som skulle vara roligt med det här.
Vad är det för konstigt folk som kommer med dessa förslag?!😬😅
När någon i troll-armén tipsar om klipp. Totalt meningslöst.
De enda som är förvirrade här är vi tittare. Clickbait titel. VEM VAR DET SOM TIPSADE?!
Click Bait-turken
Hahaha
Jag tror faktiskt det bara är roligt för rasister. De tycker väl han pratar roligt och att han inte vet vem Leif Loket är eller förstår konceptet med TV4+.
Men som du säger så svarar han ju bara på frågor. En helt vanlig människa.
Tydligen var klippet poppis för 20 år sen typ. Kanske folk bara tyckte afrikanen var lite lustig, med sin Dr Alban-accent. Hursomhelst känns rubriken missledande, borde stått "skön afrikan" istället :)
Åsålitteriss
Språk och annat som inte har med hur han ser ut att göra har inget med rasism att göra... Den är knappast rolig men du har fel. Också dåligt att stämpla folk som kan finna detta roligt av andra anledningar för rasister. Sjukt hur folk har tagit meningen ur det ordet, gör det svårare att stoppa och belysa faktisk rasism.
@@Nekotaku_TV 100%
Håller med. Fattar inte vad som är roligt. Säkert kul för nån!
Aldrig sett det här innan. Roligt? Nä. 🤷♂️
Detta är ingen humor. Mobbing möjligtvis. Han svarar så gott han kan... Tror det är några som lurats med dig. SD-troll?
The guy was defended in the original clip and people thought he seemed like a really cool guy, he just had a funny way of answering the questions and back then it was very easy for clips like this to become a meme. I remember people at schools saying "Och så lite ris" as a reference, and everyone was positive towards it. The comments from 8-15 years past call out the interviewer for asking dumb questions and that the clip should be renamed to "Skön snubbe gillar ris" or something like that.
Håller helt med dig Jonathan, förstår inte varför denna har så mycket klick.
Är jag helt förvirrad eller skulle inte du kolla Bara Ben förresten?
You're the second person that mentioned that. I didn't have that on my list, but I guess I have to do it soon.
@@JonathanRollinssthlm305Interesting! I just had to find out if I was going mad but no (eller jag skulle ju kunna hålla på och bli galen ändå men inte pga detta) I went back and searched and at the end of the Björn Gustavsson-video you said that the next reaction was Bara Ben by Galenskaparna.
I don’t know if it’s your cup of tea but as someone who’ve dabbled in writing I find it a bit funny but mostly impressive.
Fattar inte heller det roliga….
Kolla istället ”körkortsturken”! :)
It's on the list!
Yeah his Swedish is just lacking and it sounds maybe a bit funny (because it's odd and unexpected) how he ads rice like that and he's saying something is good when it doesn't sound like it would be or when he doesn't understand/communicate it right. But there wasn't really any confusion...
It’s just about a strange dialect, like yours. The man speaks perfect Swedish, just with an intonation that is a little off. Not a very good suggestion, and a bit rasist.
Va fan såg jag precis? Han var la inte förvirrad? Är detta sketchen? Att den som tittar blir förvirrad?
You like his songs maby you will like his humor os well! Do "Björn Skifs möter Jesus"
Vad hände med Bara B:en?
Wonderful sound in the beginning, the sound quality has improved significantly. What was the problem before, the microphone or the settings?
Jag är nog också en av de tittare som känner mig mer förvirrad än afrikanen. Fattar inte alls det roliga.
Men nästa ska jag absolut kolla. Allt med Galenskaparna + After Shave är klassiker!
I guess the funny part is that he thinks everything sounds good.
Dumma djävla frågor !,,,,! Not funny !!!
Yeah. There are different types of humour, this is pretty much laughing ~at~ someone. The only thing that is "funny" is that he isn't good at the language (He is clearly a new learner, he resorts to using "good"). The only thing that actually was sign that he was "confused" was a very short while when he mistook these people saying that Bingolotto had been moved from TV4 to TV4+ and he thought that it was TV4+ that had moved.
So. Yeah.. That is humour for people who have a mindset that is based on a world-view that nurtures racism. This is kind of the type of humour that I think about when people talk about the "Superiority" theory of laughter. I personally think that laughter have two ways of arriving; One is a social sign that you aren't harmful. (Like Yawning), which leads to "Nervous laughter" (Which tend to piss angry people off even more, but I think the "tick" to laugh in tense situations is specifically do show that you are not a threat).. or.. Cognitive dissonance where laughter may be a displacement behaviour. The dissonance between "The expected" and "The unexpected", where the actual level of humour depends on a lot of factors, such as.. The distance between the two, and also how late you find out the unexpected, and also whether you had made presumptions and actually "invested" in it (like if you answer a question "in good faith". Of course Laughter is only used as a displacement behaviour if you feel comfortable.
I had a teacher that had a seriously sour disposition and once he tried to break the ice with the class by telling a joke. We can blame his monotone voice, and lack of facial expressions to show that it was intended as a joke, but.. We understood, but no one laughed. That is because no one was comfortable in the situation.. It was Awkward.. AND that is actually WHY delivery is so important. A monotone voice versus a friendly one. An actual genuine smile while telling the joke.. Even the pacing.. All of these are supposed to show that you are safe, you can be comfortable.
I mention these to explain why I think this joke makes me think a few things. The people who find this funny have to actually.. Either
See the "Swedish language" as the expected (at least their own understanding of it)... and.. See the fact that someone struggles as the unexpected. I mean; The struggles were not bad.. and actually feel comfortable enough to laugh. I am not saying that the "Comfort" in itself has to be bad, but if you are in this category and feel comfortable to laugh in someone's face, hang someone out on the internet (without worrying that the person MAY feel humiliated), and try to spread it, etc.. you are still doing harm. I shan't say I haven't (on occasion) kind of giggled a bit at someone making a beginners mistake, but there have always been a bit of a. ."Bless his heart" sensation.. as in "Laughing with him within his struggles". A good example of this is the joke I once heard (presented as a real story, so I don't know), where a farmer had seen his foreign farmhand be chased by the geese (They are big, and hostile.. and hiss when they are angry with someone).. When the farm hand came in he told the farmer "I don't like the cobra-chicken". A beginner doing their best? Absolutely. Good enough?.. Sure.. If anything after I heard this I really want to rename geese to cobra-chickens.. yet.. Funny?.. absolutely giggle-worthy.
OR!.. Simply feel comfortable enough to laugh ~at~ this person, due to a sense of disdain and superiority..
Both are built on a racist foundation. The first one isn't in itself direct "ill will", but can be almost as harmless because this is where the people who say "I am not racist" and then vote for the racist party because they think their arguments "makes sense".. Fortunately THAT one can easily be cured if they get more familiar with more people who actually come from other nations. What you don't know, you fear. A lot of people try to say that they aren't racists and try to point as to what they think mean they are racists.. Well.. Some of them are clearly delusional, others are trying to define racist to be so hardcore hate-based that no one can be.. BUT.. some are trying to show the distinction between ill will or not. .BUT.. Racism from hate, Racism from fear, and Racism from ignorance.. are either way a matter of racism.
I mean. Couldn't it simply be that talking a little funny IS funny, regardless of race or whatever. Don't need to laugh at someone to find it funny, Peter Sellers comes to mind. Making race the central topic every time is inventing a problem within itself.
Still I mean, someone regardless of who it is who says that everything is good is a little funny, in a good and positive way.
@@treetoon_ .. Ah, yes.. The "Reversal of guilt" instead of discussing the topic.
"A little funny".. Well; I suspect you didn't read my post because I didn't object to "A little funny"..
"Making race the central topic".. Well. The person who posted the actual clip is the ones who made race the topic.. Or didn't you read the word "African"?..
In this case they even didn't make a claim that "his accent is a bit funny", they said he was "Confused". It's not a judgement on his language, it's a judgement on this person's state of mind.. and.. Everyone gets confused once in a while, which is what is portrayed here. Confused in this case is literally used as a loaded term.
Mistakes in communications happen.. sometimes they are "A little funny".. The thing is; Someone without a full grasp of language is something that happens OFTEN.. in real life.. If someone feels the need to penetrate society with repeated clips of every instance. They are trying to send a message. Sellers was a "parody" because he KNEW how to speak properly, this is literally holding individuals out and posting them online.
No; This video serves one purpose.. and that is laughter through mockery. Spreading it also send a message to everyone struggling with learning the language: "You are not acceptable".. NOT because someone tries to INVENT humorous situations with ACTUAL misunderstandings and funny situations, but instead through.. Just pointing and laughing.
@@rogerlundstrom6926 That's one way to interpret the situation, one of many ways. Another way is to say that it helps alleviate and rid of racism, because it makes the topic banal. If we can laugh about each others misery, no matter the topic, it encourages and creates solidarity.
I don't know what the intention of the person who wrote the title is. Simultaneously, there's a Swedish clip of a bunch of Swedes flying remote airplanes who can't speak English very well which everyone seems to be laughing at freely. From this perspective, is this not the ultimate form of racism? Where it seems some races are being treated differently than others.
I'm not the one treating people differently based on their race, I'm treating them the same. You wanna ban all jokes related to race? Fine, but I think it will create more racism as a consequence because the net effect is tip toeing on egg shells and comedy/language censorship.
@@treetoon_
"Another way is to say that it helps alleviate and rid of racism, because it makes the topic banal". I'd say this isn't even a matter of Interpretation. It has never ever worked this way. What you don't seem to get is that there is a HUGE difference between "banter" (which happen between two people who are peers.. IF there is a power-imbalance what is riveting and what is bullying changes).. As I tried to tell in my first reply to you there is a huge difference between whether you laugh at one or..l with them- with more words and more accurately. ~WHEN~ there is an ~actual~ divide and you want to bring people together then making fun of the other on the other side of the divide STRENGTHEN the division. THAT is how this have always worked in history, that is not peers laughing WITH each other.. That is one side kicking down, and the other may try to do the same, but the people who are "comfortable" in the situation who gets told jokes about them that are "kicking up" usually take it really bad. THAT is often what SD is talking about when they talk about how immigrants hate us.. that is when THEY make fun of US!.. and we are NOT taking it on the cheek. The people who vote SD who ever hear an immigrant say ANYTHING less than flattering say "Oh, THIS is how they feel about us, and they want to live in our nation!???"..
I know I may be splitting hairs, but it is a small distinction with a HUGE difference.
You treat people the same?.. Well.. You are AWARE that UA-cam is a massmedia open for everyone all over the world?.. So... Would you f.ex have reacted the same if you would've seen f.ex. a video on German TV where they filmed a Swedish person being slightly less than perfect in german and they literally made a big deal out of it?.. This is REALLY not even that funny.. He clearly just made one mistake in understanding something, and technically I have made that mistake and I speak and understand Swedish flawlessly, I may just make a slightly different reference so I get it wrong.
" is this not the ultimate form of racism? Where it seems some races are being treated differently than others.".. No, it is not. It's called situational awareness and it is a vital skill to have. (I know, I had to learn it as I have Autism, and we do like simple and clear rules)... To say "I do the same to everyone" is NOT how you know "You are treating people equal".. because.. I am 100% sure that if one of your friends said.. "This is hurtful".. you'd apologize, whereas you SEEYou wanna ban all jokes related to race?M to think that for people you do NOT care about you don't have to think: "Am I kicking someone who is already down"?. .I guess I am coming back to actually being able to make distinction between different situations.
and I STILL don't think for a second that you seriously would've found it equally "funny" (or acceptable) if the same happened to you. (Heck, you DID seem to at least register, and took a note of he fact that these people laughed at those people you mentioned).. They may literally have BEEN bullies, but you have been primed that you aren't allowed to make distinction between laughter and laughter. We are all victims for the Dunning-Kruger effect. I am 100% sure that you have made some embarrassing flaws in your life, you have probably forgotten them through the process of selective memory.. but.. if you at the first year of college get something SERIOUSLY wrong, and someone chose to put it out on youtube, and instead of saying that this was a beginners error used a different term.. a loaded term.. such as.. "Stupid".. it is in the same wheelhouse as "Confused!" when you know it isn't true.
"You wanna ban all jokes related to race?" You are constantly misrepresenting (or lying?) about what I say or imply, and now I can't even think it is in good faith. What you have repeatedly doing is called a "Straw-man argument" (With strong "Black-White fallacy"- or binary thinking as it is called). That is when you reframe/reshape, or possibly even re-invent an argument made.. All three of those are different levels of lying- IF you do so intentionally. You have a narrative; I am not obliged to follow that narrative so don't push me into it- please. I never talked about banning ANYTHING!!!.. I just want to cal a shovel a shovel.. That IS a racist clip that primarily is funny to people who have a tendency to follow narratives that are racial in their nature. Denmark tried to say "Let's the Racists get actual influence in the politics so they are included" and that did NOT solve their racism. Again: I ask you to find ANYTHING that would justify you using the word.. "BAN".. which is a strong word, and outside of it's proper context it IS a lie. then I never said anything about Jokes based on "race" (btw; You are thinking of Ethnicity, but then again the same problem exist with the term "Racism", there is only one human race) not to be allowed.. Or in themselves AUTOMATICALLY being "Racist".. You must have skipped pretty much everything I read in my first comment to even TRY to claim that I was even CLOSE to saying so.. I was talking about whether something was of good will or bad will..
This video.. IS.. mockery.. nothing you have said actually makes it differently.
Verkar ju va en skön snubbe, fattar inte heller
Could you please do a reaction to ”Vår Betong” by Jacco? Love the content bro, keep up the good work!
I’ve never seen this before either🧐 Sometimes a clip becomes very big in a specific community but not outside of that community, maybe thats the case here.. I think some people laugh at both accents and people that they think sound funny for other reasons without thinking that much about it.. So it doesnt necessarily has got to do with him being african in this case. (But then there are people that are racist too of course.)
I figured they were trying to go for the "Turk" thing in the name but he's from a different region so "Afrikan" was the choice
Jag känner att det är "Intervjuaren" som känns förvirrad (Apropå frågan om att programmet flyttats till TV4+ och att denna man inte förstod frågeställarens korkade fråga
Nä vem tipsade om den? Den är inte rolig, han ger la lite konstiga svar men är inte kul alls.
Gör Hassan i stället de har många roliga.
He sounds so cute, that's what's funny
He doesn't sound confused though
@@JonathanRollinssthlm305 I agree. he's polite, not confused. maybe some people say he's confused because he's saying things he doesn't mean.
Självförtroende hade han iaf. Om jag pluggat Swahili i 6 månader och får en mikrofon uppkörd i ansiktet om något tv-sprogram så hade det låtit precis lika förvirrande, nej jag tyckte inte det var så roligt, men tagga ned, det är "Fish out of water" som är grejen.
jag har aldrig sett det här förut och jag förstår inte heller det roliga , han är inte förvirrad
Tipps på svensk humor som går att hitta på UA-cam är "Tack gode gud att du är här!". Improvisationsprogram som urprungligen är Australiensiskt. Avsnittet med Carina Berg till exempel är väldigt roligt.
Han pratar roligt, han är glad och positiv till allt, den tafatta intervjuaren, missförståndet gällande TV4+, och "lite ris!". Det är kul! Han är skön! Jag håller med om att titeln är missvisande dock.
Precis! Skön snubbe, han är rolig och glad.
Fast inte så kul egentligen. Killen är ju trevlig, men så mkt mer är det inte.
The funny part here was your reaction.
Haha I aim to please!
Dated
Jag fattar inte?!
Trevlig kille. Förstår inte riktigt hurmorn.
Detta va inte roligt. Han kämpade o försökte. Många hade tatt det på engelska.