Now that is one fine '61. My parents had a '61 Parkwood Station Wagon with a 283 and a power glide. They added an add on air conditioner. We made several 700 mile round trips to the beach. I do not remember my dad having any trouble out of that car. I was 12 and got the honors of helping to wash it. Thanks for the great videos.
I love the design of the 1961 Bubbletop. Even if is has been designed more than 60 years ago, I don‘t think it is old at all. It has aged very well and the bodystyle isn‘t dated at all. The roofline is still breathtakingly elegant. Great car design.
My parents had a 61 when I was young too. I sure wish they would have held on to it. Glad this one brought back some memories for you too. Thanks for watching!
I"m finishing a frame off restoration of my 61 Impala, 4 door sedan ... "flat top" ... my first car from 1982. This is a beautiful car. 409 is rare in 61. Why did they put the reverse lights on the inboard. Factory/OEM is ... middle. I added blue dots to my tail light lenses. :) thanks for showing us this Impala.
The 61 Impala SS only came with the big block W engines, starting with the 348 with the 305 hp / 340 hp / 350 hp engines and the 409 - 360 hp engine. This 61 is not a SS car or a 409 engine but a 348 with 409 stick on engine decals. The oil dip stick tube on this engine is on drivers side (348), a 409 dip stick is on the passenger side. Both 348 and 409 had the front grill cross flag emblem, and SS over crossed flags quarter panel emblems. The trunk lid V has SS over crossed flags. This car has cross flags quarter emblems only and a cross flags 348 trunk emblem. This is a super nice 61 Impala with a powerful 348 but it is not a 409. Now we know why there was no info on the windshield. Love the W engine family 348 / 409 / 427.
Good going, you caught the same quirks I did. I can't really tell if it has the dash grab bar or not. I love the '61 seat design & steering wheel, sportier looking than the '62s.
You may be right but note the early 409s used a 348 block. If this is the original 409 engine it is a rare find indeed. Emblems don't mean much-could have been stolen or lost over the last sixty years. If it's a real 409 car with the original engine it is as rare as the SS cars in any case.
They don't have the pricing available on this one yet. I'll try to post it as soon as the info is available. The Spring Fling is at all three locations tomorrow. You definitely should go check it out.
Thanks for posting this. I have had 2, 63s and a 58 impala. Have always wanted a 61, i think by far they are the coolest looking impala. Esp like the 409, had HP tri-power 348 in my 58. Keep poeting, i watch all your videos, Tom in Portland OR.
I'm a Mopar guy when it comes to high performance cars/muscle cars but the big body Chevy's of the 60's have always been among my favorites...especially the 1961-62 bubble tops and the 1965-66 models. Always wanted a 62 Bel Air 409/409 or a 66 Biscayne L72 427/425. Really I like the looks of the 65 slightly better than the 66 but the L72 wasnt available until 66. The top engine option in 65 was a 400 horsepower 409 but then the 409 was phased out and replaced mid year by the new L78 396/425 horse big block. The architecture of the 396/427/454 big blocks was actually based off of the 427 Mystery Engine which Junior Johnson ran in his Impala SS in the 1963 NASCAR season
Looking back through your videos and this one certainly caught my attention. What a sweet car, just perfect in every way. A friend used to have a Black one just like this, 409, 4 speed, only he was probably getting more than 360hp out of his. He told me they only made around 150 of the 360 hp 409 Impalas in 1961. It looked great and was the fastest thing around.
All i Can Say is.... SHE'S REAL FINE MY 409... LOVE IT, MINE WAS A 62' WISH I STILL HAD HER ... IF I KNEW THEN WHAT I KNOW NOW, I WOULD BE VERY RICH JUST FROM THE CARS I OWNED, I GUESS ANYONE WOULD BE THAT'S OLD ENOUGH TO HAVE OWN THEM BACK IN THE DAY GONE BY ....
What a nice '61 bubble top. Wow! Not a thing needs to be done to this one. I mistakenly thought that the 409 full bodied cars debuted in '62, but I was apparently wrong. No tell tale 409 "stickers" on the quarters. A real traffic light "sleeper". My good friend had a '61 bubble top in the fall of '69 that he did a lot of work on, putting a 327 in to replace the tired 283. It was the same color combination as this one.
In 1968 when I was 8 years old my dad had the same exact one the only difference is that it was a Bronze color and it had a 283 engine. I was Chevy would bring this style back but they would probably have to make some modifications on it nice Impala bubble top Thank You for posting.
As I've said before, the Chevrolet Impala is my all time favorite car! From 1958 to 1996. After that, PURE S**T!!!!! Thanks for this beautiful one Jeff!!!!
WOW WOW WOW Jeff! OMG EVEN! LOL. I've never seen those wire wheels but the only gripe I have is where are the WIDE WHITE WALLS? '61 was the last year of the traditional wide whites. What a beauty. Power windows and all. I looked up the car not posted yet. WOW
I thought these were so ugly when I was growing up. I absolutely hated the rear end design. Now it's ok and I can appreciate the car as a whole. This, of course is a beautiful example.
In 1961 the only HP option for the 409 was the 360 HP, also you can visually check the difference between a 409 and 348 block by the dipstick location. The 348 dipstick was on the drivers side vs the 409 which was on the passengers side. That's a 348 block. Also the backup lights would be between the stop lights and actually less 348 SS were built than 409s, so they are more rare if documented.
The boss, or hole in the block, for the dipstick is molded into the block, making it impossible to switch sides. The dual quad intake wasn't available until Nov. 1961 for the 1962 model year. sure a dealer could install one on a 61 as well as anyone else, but were never available from the factory, as factory documentation shows.
@@samhunt9308 OMG, how did I miss the dip stick. You are right, it is a 348 block. Shame on them! So they bored it out. I have read that the original 409 block was a little weak, so they made some changes to it for 62. I wonder how this 348 block will hold up. Why couldn't they just make it the numbers matching 348 it probably was? Man. That would be just as fun. Huh, never heard of the dealer installed dual quad in a 61. Of course, I have never seen a 61 (real) 409. Saw a Super Sport 348 once. I had a 340 HP 409, 1963 that I, of course, wish I had back. That with 370 gears was quite enough for me.
I had a 62 white Hardtop Impala trimmed in blue. It has AC by Chrysler Air Temp. One Saturday afternoon it backfired while driving by a hospital and seconds later it burst into flames. A general alarm went out and every fire company in the county showed up. The car was totaled and I still owed payments on it. Why me lord. I had just spent the day washing, waxing and detailing the car fir a hot date that night.
Beautiful car with a lot of custom touches. Someone really took their time with it. Am I right in assuming if it had been stock there wouldn't have normally been a passenger rear view mirror back in that year. I have seen stock older cars where it only had a drivers side. Albeit that it's more safe and I prefer to see two rear views on any car it was just something I noticed.
RamblinAround Oh no kidding. I always wondered about it after doing a couple of models where it was missing from a couple of cars that were of earlier vintage. Thanks for clearing it up I never though about it maybe being an option.
Thanks.... will look for it. If interested and wanted to buy can you have it brought to your Chicago location? We are headed to see the Spring Fling tomorrow. Guss I will have to look at the 1960 Bel Air you have since the 61 bubble top you had was sold.
This car is really a clean and well presented example of a restored 1961 Impala. That being said it's not a SS 409 and never will be. There are so many things wrong with the car as it sits. I had one in 1961 right after High School. Do not list or sell this as a 1961 SS 409. The engine valve covers should be silver not Chevy orange. The oil dip stick is on the wrong side. The 409 dipstick was on the Passenger side. The reverse lights were in the CENTER group. The badging is a standard 348 series. The 409 had Checkered Flags with intergraded SS emblems on the rear fenders and center trunk lid unique to the 409 only. There never was an Edlebrock carb on the 360 HP version but a Carter AFB. Not sure what Trans is in this car but you do not push down on a Muncie to put the car into reverse. You pull to the left and push up. Once again this car is really well done but it's no 409. The up dating with Air , Hurst shifter, Disc brakes, is a nice touch.
The 4-speed trans should be a Borg-Warner unit, with Muncie transmissions coming online in 1964. I have no doubt you're correct, that this car is a clone - real SS409 cars from 1961 are incredibly rare, especially since so many of the original engines failed and GM didn't make these in earnest until 1962.
@@Texas_Cruiser I am not sure but your guess is probably correct. True spokes had heavy wire spokes and these are heavy gage wire. Also thanks for the comment.
Wish that was in Chicago to look at. I tried to find this car on your site but nothing is there. I might have missed it in the video but what is the price for this one? Do you have a link to it? Spring Fling is happening on Saturday in Chicago as well right?
This car's a classic. Beautiful indeed!!!
Whether it has a 409 or not, it's still a beautiful car. It's a beautiful custom.
You've gotta love those 1961 Chevys. Beautiful car.
Glad you liked it. Thanks for taking a look!
Now that is one fine '61. My parents had a '61 Parkwood Station Wagon with a 283 and a power glide. They added an add on air conditioner. We made several 700 mile round trips to the beach. I do not remember my dad having any trouble out of that car. I was 12 and got the honors of helping to wash it. Thanks for the great videos.
This is definitely a great looking car. I'd like to see that paint out in the sunlight. Thanks for taking a look!
This car is areal beauty for sure. Thanks for having a look at it!
Yep and this one is super nice. Thanks for taking a look Gabe.
Yep, this one is done right for sure. Thanks for having a look!
Really beautiful ...The color...the door sound is original......
Thanks for having a look!
I agree, that thing is beautiful inside and out.
Thanks for reminding me, what a great design the '61 full size GM coupe was.
I agree, it really is one of their best.
That thing is really Sick!! One of the nicest Cars you've ever shown us!!☺
I love the design of the 1961 Bubbletop. Even if is has been designed more than 60 years ago, I don‘t think it is old at all. It has aged very well and the bodystyle isn‘t dated at all. The roofline is still breathtakingly elegant. Great car design.
This is one of the nicest that I've seen in a while. Thanks for taking a look my friend!
My parents had a 61 when I was young too. I sure wish they would have held on to it. Glad this one brought back some memories for you too. Thanks for watching!
It's definitely a very popular year. Thanks for taking a look Jim!
Thanks for watching our videos, we appreciate it. Glad you found us on Google+ too. Hope you're having a great weekend!
Fabulous styling. '61 was last of the great 50s era interior styling n chevys. BRING IT BACK, DETROIT
Yep, this one is a real beauty. Not sure of the pricing yet, but it sure is a nice example. Thanks for watching my friend!
I always liked that year with the bubble top and the 61 Ford Star Liner 2 Great cars from the Year I was Born !!!
Yep, you're quick on the draw today George. Thanks for watching!
This really is a great example. I like those Ford Starliner's too. Thanks for watching!
409 or 348, whatever. It's a gorgeous car!
Thanks for taking a look at it!
I'm a Ford guy, but this is the Chevy I would be glad to own.
61, 67 & 68 are my DREAM CARS.😻😎😏
This is the 360 HP version. Thanks for checking it out!
Only available in 61.
this Impala is absolutely beautiful!! thank you for the video!
I"m finishing a frame off restoration of my 61 Impala, 4 door sedan ... "flat top" ... my first car from 1982.
This is a beautiful car. 409 is rare in 61.
Why did they put the reverse lights on the inboard. Factory/OEM is ... middle. I added blue dots to my tail light lenses. :)
thanks for showing us this Impala.
Only 142 produced with the 409.
Truly a beautiful car...
this 61 impala is so beautiful I wish todays impalas wouldn't look like a Toyota Corolla its very disappointing so sad:(
Had a 09 LTZ Impala assure you that it didn't look like a Toyota
The 61 Impala SS only came with the big block W engines, starting with the 348 with the 305 hp / 340 hp / 350 hp engines and the 409 - 360 hp engine. This 61 is not a SS car or a 409 engine but a 348 with 409 stick on engine decals. The oil dip stick tube on this engine is on drivers side (348), a 409 dip stick is on the passenger side. Both 348 and 409 had the front grill cross flag emblem, and SS over crossed flags quarter panel emblems. The trunk lid V has SS over crossed flags. This car has cross flags quarter emblems only and a cross flags 348 trunk emblem. This is a super nice 61 Impala with a powerful 348 but it is not a 409. Now we know why there was no info on the windshield. Love the W engine family 348 / 409 / 427.
Good going, you caught the same quirks I did. I can't really tell if it has the dash grab bar or not. I love the '61 seat design & steering wheel, sportier looking than the '62s.
You may be right but note the early 409s used a 348 block. If this is the original 409 engine it is a rare find indeed. Emblems don't mean much-could have been stolen or lost over the last sixty years. If it's a real 409 car with the original engine it is as rare as the SS cars in any case.
@@greymann Maybe, but I doubt it, if this was the real deal it would not be in this underground garage, lot of cars. Thank you, Grey Mann.
@@chrisjeffries2322 It was just a thought Chris--I had a 61 Impala (348) about 55 years ago. Still miss that car!
I've always liked the look of those Jenson's...big Chrysler power under the hood too.
That's ok, thanks again for watching
They don't have the pricing available on this one yet. I'll try to post it as soon as the info is available. The Spring Fling is at all three locations tomorrow. You definitely should go check it out.
Thanks for posting this. I have had 2, 63s and a 58 impala. Have always wanted a 61, i think by far they are the coolest looking impala. Esp like the 409, had HP tri-power 348 in my 58. Keep poeting, i watch all your videos, Tom in Portland OR.
Gorgeous car.
If I could own any car this would be it!
Bu araclari bu halde muhafaza edebilmek oldukca mesakkatli is..ancak bir o kadar da keyfli olsa gerek..
only if i had Watch this video yesterday I could of gone down to gateway to see a the cool cars. I just happen to live in that area too .
I'm a Mopar guy when it comes to high performance cars/muscle cars but the big body Chevy's of the 60's have always been among my favorites...especially the 1961-62 bubble tops and the 1965-66 models. Always wanted a 62 Bel Air 409/409 or a 66 Biscayne L72 427/425. Really I like the looks of the 65 slightly better than the 66 but the L72 wasnt available until 66. The top engine option in 65 was a 400 horsepower 409 but then the 409 was phased out and replaced mid year by the new L78 396/425 horse big block. The architecture of the 396/427/454 big blocks was actually based off of the 427 Mystery Engine which Junior Johnson ran in his Impala SS in the 1963 NASCAR season
It was a rainy day, but we still had fun. I'll have a video up of the event in a little bit.
this is a solid car !
Looking back through your videos and this one certainly caught my attention. What a sweet car, just perfect in every way. A friend used to have a Black one just like this, 409, 4 speed, only he was probably getting more than 360hp out of his. He told me they only made around 150 of the 360 hp 409 Impalas in 1961. It looked great and was the fastest thing around.
I really like these bubble top Impalas and those 409's sure are strong runners. Thanks for taking a look at it.
Yup. There were only 453 1961 factory SS cars, of which only 142 had the 409.
All i Can Say is.... SHE'S REAL FINE MY 409... LOVE IT, MINE WAS A 62' WISH I STILL HAD HER ... IF I KNEW THEN WHAT I KNOW NOW, I WOULD BE VERY RICH JUST FROM THE CARS I OWNED, I GUESS ANYONE WOULD BE THAT'S OLD ENOUGH TO HAVE OWN THEM BACK IN THE DAY GONE BY ....
Beautiful Chevrolet
Thanks for watching!
What a nice '61 bubble top. Wow! Not a thing needs to be done to this one. I mistakenly thought that the 409 full bodied cars debuted in '62, but I was apparently wrong. No tell tale 409 "stickers" on the quarters. A real traffic light "sleeper". My good friend had a '61 bubble top in the fall of '69 that he did a lot of work on, putting a 327 in to replace the tired 283. It was the same color combination as this one.
GM put some of the last 348s in 61s and they started the 409s of that year also.
one of my favorite
In 1968 when I was 8 years old my dad had the same exact one the only difference is that it was a Bronze color and it had a 283 engine. I was Chevy would bring this style back but they would probably have to make some modifications on it nice Impala bubble top Thank You for posting.
As I've said before, the Chevrolet Impala is my all time favorite car! From 1958 to 1996. After that, PURE S**T!!!!! Thanks for this beautiful one Jeff!!!!
Wow so very beautiful amazing cars beautiful amazing looks
Dream car my first 1961 impala 283 blue
Beautifull car just what i want to bring it to puerto rico
WOW WOW WOW Jeff! OMG EVEN! LOL. I've never seen those wire wheels but the only gripe I have is where are the WIDE WHITE WALLS? '61 was the last year of the traditional wide whites. What a beauty. Power windows and all. I looked up the car not posted yet. WOW
A car that's been done right
Paint is amazingly beautiful . yes over restored but def a quality job !!! A+++++
I thought these were so ugly when I was growing up. I absolutely hated the rear end design. Now it's ok and I can appreciate the car as a whole. This, of course is a beautiful example.
What a beauty!!!!
Great looking Impala, Engine looks like 348 block,......348=dipstick on driver's side, 409=dipstick on passenger side.
👍What a stunning ride....Wow....a show car for sure.👋🍺
امبالا 1960 أفضل مديل🙂👋🇸🇦💚
In 1961 the only HP option for the 409 was the 360 HP, also you can visually check the difference between a 409 and 348 block by the dipstick location. The 348 dipstick was on the drivers side vs the 409 which was on the passengers side. That's a 348 block. Also the backup lights would be between the stop lights and actually less 348 SS were built than 409s, so they are more rare if documented.
good catch
The boss, or hole in the block, for the dipstick is molded into the block, making it impossible to switch sides. The dual quad intake wasn't available until Nov. 1961 for the 1962 model year. sure a dealer could install one on a 61 as well as anyone else, but were never available from the factory, as factory documentation shows.
@@samhunt9308 OMG, how did I miss the dip stick. You are right, it is a 348 block. Shame on them! So they bored it out. I have read that the original 409 block was a little weak, so they made some changes to it for 62. I wonder how this 348 block will hold up. Why couldn't they just make it the numbers matching 348 it probably was? Man. That would be just as fun. Huh, never heard of the dealer installed dual quad in a 61. Of course, I have never seen a 61 (real) 409. Saw a Super Sport 348 once. I had a 340 HP 409, 1963 that I, of course, wish I had back. That with 370 gears was quite enough for me.
Great car 🚗
Hi RamblinAround,Wow."What a Beautiful 1961 Chevy Impala.Very,Very,Nice Car,Great Color,Nice Detail.Super Cool Video.***"Thanks"***
the greatest label on earth.
Great depth to paint ...amazing windshield !! Bad a** ride !!
That bubble top is just beautiful. Too bad GM did not keep that for a few years.
lakecrab It was an option in 1962 also(Bubble Top)
I wish I could drive this everyday
Very nice nice nice and cool and. Fun car Thank you.
what a beauty I remember them well love to have it
Nice, sleek!
Sweet
That 57 behind u❤️❤️❤️
I think you may be right, it looks a lowered to me too.
I had a 62 white Hardtop Impala trimmed in blue. It has AC by Chrysler Air Temp. One Saturday afternoon it backfired while driving by a hospital and seconds later it burst into flames. A general alarm went out and every fire company in the county showed up. The car was totaled and I still owed payments on it. Why me lord. I had just spent the day washing, waxing and detailing the car fir a hot date that night.
Very nice next generation style after the extreme fin era.
Nice ride ❤
Beautiful car with a lot of custom touches. Someone really took their time with it.
Am I right in assuming if it had been stock there wouldn't have normally been a passenger rear view mirror back in that year. I have seen stock older cars where it only had a drivers side. Albeit that it's more safe and I prefer to see two rear views on any car it was just something I noticed.
The passenger side mirror may have been an option. I have seen an original Chevrolet ad for the 61 Chevy, where the car had a passenger side mirror.
RamblinAround
Oh no kidding. I always wondered about it after doing a couple of models where it was missing from a couple of cars that were of earlier vintage.
Thanks for clearing it up I never though about it maybe being an option.
Matthew I was wondering why you thought it wasn't a 409.. Is it because the dipstick is not on the passenger side of the block?
From the factory, I believe the exhaust would have turned down behind the tires....not come straight out like this one.
You are correct.
Awesome! Same age as Me.
Love that impala 1960, beautiful. Nice job, thanks for sharing!
@Rafael Viafranco
This is a 1961 IMPALA, Bro Man! Not a "1960 Impala". You're wrong and you stand corrected.
I see this video was uploaded 2013 but it possible the car might still be for sale, wish there were a phone number to call about it.
Красота!
Best car!
Wow!!!
Thanks.... will look for it. If interested and wanted to buy can you have it brought to your Chicago location? We are headed to see the Spring Fling tomorrow. Guss I will have to look at the 1960 Bel Air you have since the 61 bubble top you had was sold.
This car is really a clean and well presented example of a restored 1961 Impala. That being said it's not a SS 409 and never will be. There are so many things wrong with the car as it sits. I had one in 1961 right after High School. Do not list or sell this as a 1961 SS 409. The engine valve covers should be silver not Chevy orange. The oil dip stick is on the wrong side. The 409 dipstick was on the Passenger side. The reverse lights were in the CENTER group. The badging is a standard 348 series. The 409 had Checkered Flags with intergraded SS emblems on the rear fenders and center trunk lid unique to the 409 only. There never was an Edlebrock carb on the 360 HP version but a Carter AFB. Not sure what Trans is in this car but you do not push down on a Muncie to put the car into reverse. You pull to the left and push up. Once again this car is really well done but it's no 409. The up dating with Air , Hurst shifter, Disc brakes, is a nice touch.
The 4-speed trans should be a Borg-Warner unit, with Muncie transmissions coming online in 1964. I have no doubt you're correct, that this car is a clone - real SS409 cars from 1961 are incredibly rare, especially since so many of the original engines failed and GM didn't make these in earnest until 1962.
You know you're stuff sir. Do you happen to know what kind of wheels these are? Truespokes is my guess.
@@Texas_Cruiser I am not sure but your guess is probably correct. True spokes had heavy wire spokes and these are heavy gage wire. Also thanks for the comment.
@@edwardberwind8544 thank you I'll be back to ask you some more car questions down the road lol. 👍
Nice clean 348 Impala , not a 409 engine.
Excelent car and chevy bee leer 57
may I ask for how much has been sold?
Bet that windshield don't come cheap !
Wish that was in Chicago to look at. I tried to find this car on your site but nothing is there. I might have missed it in the video but what is the price for this one? Do you have a link to it? Spring Fling is happening on Saturday in Chicago as well right?
usually the b/u lights are in the middle spot, but they might have just done it freelance
"Just a beautiful car"he says at 2:42, and then the bumper falls off. 😄
That Edelbrock 4-barrel is probably 850 cfm, making it almost as powerful as the twin Carter AFB's that 409's had in '62 anyway, right...?!
In many cases, a single four barrel on a good intake can outperform dual fours.
@@RamblinAround The old cast iron intake manifold in the '61 couldn't flow all that good.
The tail lights are configured wrong. The backup lights should be in the center of each set of three tail lights.