I fought in Stalingrad. It was common for the enemy to do a back flip and couple of jumping jacks just before they died from a bullet wound. Talk about a horrible death.
@@rawgab4439 yeah man, I remember my grandpa telling me of how torturing it was to have no internet. He couldn't open Instagram, twitter or UA-cam. It was a living hell 😔
The scene with the big German guy walking through that hall and firing that MG42 from his hip is cool, reminds me of the "smart gun" in the Aliens movie.
That's some pretty amazing high pressure "volatile Vodka" they "Blew up". Not too mention the extreme zoom capability of the 2.5x Mosin scope (maybe 4x?). But there is the Magic of Movie Cinema.
He was Jim Jones 1979, he was the general in (Red dawn 1985), he was in this stalingrad movie 1990, and he was A roman general (Flavius Aiutius) in Attila (2001).
What really bothers me in these old movie battle scenes is the sterility of the casualties. Everyone is either fighting or dead - no-one gets wounded. Depicting of suffering was probably avoided in almost every country for various reasons.
Для народов Советского союза вопрос стоял жизни и смерти. Жертвы были не напрасны и любая цена за победу, куда ниже истребления. Что касается страданий то в фильме они есть и отношения есть, просто это нарезки и совсем не передают содержания фильма.
yes there is. the tiger tank at the end of the movie was build on t-34s platform. Because there only few tigers nowadays that can move. That's why they used this technique.
veramente fatto mailissimo....che spreco di mezzi per scene assolutamente inverosimili. Un offesa per quelli che ci hanno combattutto davvero a Stalingrado.
Bloody the eye relief of the girl snipers scope must be something bloody special if she can see with here eye that far back. No reticle in the scope makes for interesting sniping too.
@BillKiernan Rough guess, produce lots of smoke making the sight holes in the tank useless meaning someone has to go on top of the turret making him a sniper target, plus the fire and smoke make it harder for infantry to support the panzers, making it easier for soviet infantry to disable to destroy them.
I'm seeing a lot of people that don't know how to time stamp. To time Stamp pause the video and put the time of video you would like to stamp as so 2:12
@WiseGuy5674 Haven't seen "The Pacific" but I have "Enemy at the Gates". Both are fascinating movies but Enemy at the Gates was really a crude and rather an amatuer historian perception of real events. I'll have to check out The Pacific :) Thanks for letting me on it, never heard of it before.
yeah, its too difficult to find working, running tiger tanks. Also, technically you can take out a tank using naplam as it heats up to tank and burns the crew/cooks off the ammo (search arab israeli war 1973) so molotovs could possibly have the same effect
At first I was dubious that some Molotov cocktails would have the same explosive power as modern day C4 explosive. But then I had some Soviet era Whadkha.
@SashaVedernikov Actually, considering how old is this movie I say I am really impressed. A big improvement over the "German" Pershing tanks used in the Battle of Bulge lol.
Thank you very much! im watching it now, unfortunately the online version i found doesn't have english subtitles and i know very little Russian so i dont quite understand it hahah. But i get the idea.
Only the Germans have actually made a decent movie about this battle so far. It's a crimes that such a pivotal moment in history is either a love story or propaganda. You feel that one day the Russians will have a version that will be truly mind-blowing, God knows they deserve one.
La pelicula parece haber sido hecha en "1952" y no en 2013, las escenas de tiroteo son muy ingenuas; el soldado alemán arriba del carro blindado que abre los brazos y se inclina cuando es alcanzado. Los tiradores que alzan un casco para hacer caer al enemigo. Las escenas de ataque parecen hechas al gusto de Stalin quien al parecer no ha muerto y esta disfrutando este film, ya que cuando los rusos atacan aparece un enjambre humano y nadie vacila y todos parecen competir entre sí por ir adelante. En definitiva recomendable para todo niño ruso nieto de comisarios.
La pelicula del 2013 es una version nueva de un film sovietico de los 70, se transmitio en canal 22 con el titulo de imagenes de una vida, la version del 2013 es mas violenta, algunas de sus esenas se usaron para videos de canciones como la guerra sagrada y la division de la guardia
Esta película es de 1990, dirigida por Yuri Ozerov. La que tú dices es la de 2013, titulada también Stalingrado porque ambas están ambientadas en la misma batalla.
@BrianWilsonJacob I think tiger tanks were used in limted numbers around stalingrad but you can tell they ment them to be Panzer MkIII's because the turrent is clearly that of a Tiger and not a PIII
@BillKiernan Also bullets wouldn't light cocktails of, that's like bullets making barrels explode in video games. Or 3-4 rockets taking out a tank, its inaccurate, mostly done for looks.
@ralfisloved Let me see if I can anwer that question. The fact its in WWII using the right equipment in the movie of that times is historically accurate. As far as actual combat events it was scripted from WW2 vets from different units in different battles. Historically accurate in a sense of the times and what men had to go through but fictional in actual events displayed.
Funny movie, at 12 sec i have seen so many fake hybrid kingtiger turret on a unknow body tank-t34? and at 1.29 very exposure russian sniper.....and a kill....
Greg Torrez Yes it's Soviet made. Here is from the Wiki on the film regarding Booth "Due to the harsh economic conditions in the late 1980s Soviet Union, Ozerov was unable to secure funding for his film inside the USSR. After deliberations, he approached the American Warner Brothers for assistance. The company agreed to provide financial support, but demanded that American actors would be given representation. The reluctant director had to cast Powers Boothe for the title role of General Vasily Chuikov.[4] The film was the first Soviet-American co-production in the Perestroika era"
@SashaVedernikov Oh shit...LOL my reply was meant at enoching7 D-Day on SPR was for the most part dead on - no arguing. Band of Brothers was realistic but not accurate as in historically that I'm aware of. Its based off parajumpers behind enemy lines and their compilation of stories all rolled into one. Stil damn good job. Once again, my comment was at enoching7 cause me and you see eye to eye Well, night comrad :)
@strizhi actually band of brothers is based on a true story about easy company in the 101st airborne division of which they took part in d-day, market garden and the battle of the bulge. I'd know that because i own the dvd boxset. Plus it's also based on a book researched by stephen e ambrose.
@dachefffkoch yeah the infantry was huge, however Soviet Union was losing in 1941-42 because: 1. Soviet military doctrine focused mainly on offense rather than defense. They built a lot of tanks, airplanes in the beginning of the war and kept them close to the Western border of the Soviet Union in order to advance. Since Germans invaded and captured those territories a lot of tanks, airplanes, supplies were destroyed/captured. 2. The Great Purge of 1937. Stalin's repressions 3. Unawarness.
***** It's goofy and inaccurate but it's not 'exaggerated.' Read accounts of how the fighting went in Stalingrad and this is like watching a school play in comparison.
@nath6644 SPR is infact realistic if u think about it, i mean in the final battle of ramelle they planned step by step with machine guns and mines and positions etc etc, plus they would lose if not the other troops arrived
As you can see from our comments there are tons of different information sources and we can't know for sure which one is right, but I'm going to go with my sources.
When was this movie? The only Eastern Front WWII movies that I'm familiar with is Enemy at the Gates and Stalingrad (The German perspective one starring Thomas Krestmann). Rest are black and white ones made during and after the war.
I fought in Stalingrad. It was common for the enemy to do a back flip and couple of jumping jacks just before they died from a bullet wound. Talk about a horrible death.
Yeah Man . ..almost no WiFi and absolute no Vegan Option ...it was rough ;)
The swan dive out of the tank was magnificent.
@@rawgab4439 yeah man, I remember my grandpa telling me of how torturing it was to have no internet. He couldn't open Instagram, twitter or UA-cam. It was a living hell 😔
@@general5119 "in the suck" ;)
@@general5119 those nazi bastards got what they deserved.
MG34 with PKM ammo belt container. That's how you know these films were cheap, hahaha. Love this video!
The scene with the big German guy walking through that hall and firing that MG42 from his hip is cool, reminds me of the "smart gun" in the Aliens movie.
Fish Renfroe Boyd They used the mg34 as the foundation of the Smartgun in Aliens. The U.S. Thompson frame was the basis for the Pulse Rifle.
Fish Renfroe Boyd b
That's some pretty amazing high pressure "volatile Vodka" they "Blew up". Not too mention the extreme zoom capability of the 2.5x Mosin scope (maybe 4x?). But there is the Magic of Movie Cinema.
that guy flying at 6:51 looks cool, i love this russian movies!
I would prefer with subtitles.
He was sent into the space
i love how when a soldier get an explosion they alway rolling
Don't you always do somersaults, when you get shot or blown up?
2:55 was epic even with the music. It sounds heroic and the train yard scene also good.
It’s amazing how you can date practically any war movie simply by the sound of its fake explosions and gunfire.
or sound track music
Bloodiest battle of WW2 and the decisive turning point on Eastern front
0:54 Didn't know Powers Boothe was in this-dang, he's in war movies all over the world!
I said the same thing, that's Powers Booth.
@@joethekinghawk7514 : yes, that was indeed Powers Boothe. Stalingrad was a 1990 two-part war film directed by Ozerov.
@@Orion3741 he was an amazing actor, he will be missed.
He was Jim Jones 1979, he was the general in (Red dawn 1985), he was in this stalingrad movie 1990, and he was A roman general (Flavius Aiutius) in Attila (2001).
@@joethekinghawk7514 : very interesting. Thank you. I do believe Boothe also acted in Tombstone, along with Biehn, Russell, and Kilmer.
2:15 best death scene ever in a movie LMAO
The man jumped out the hf
You haven't seen jack shit lol
2:53 aaahh , this damn headache
Couldn't agree more, my friend.
What really bothers me in these old movie battle scenes is the sterility of the casualties. Everyone is either fighting or dead - no-one gets wounded. Depicting of suffering was probably avoided in almost every country for various reasons.
Для народов Советского союза вопрос стоял жизни и смерти. Жертвы были не напрасны и любая цена за победу, куда ниже истребления. Что касается страданий то в фильме они есть и отношения есть, просто это нарезки и совсем не передают содержания фильма.
That's always bothered me too. You don't die instantly unless you get shot in the head or heart.
@@CC-8891 the 1993 German made movie starling grad showed all the gore and suffering of war
I suppose they didn't have equipment to do the good' ol movie trick where it looks like bullets are hitting somebody.
yes there is. the tiger tank at the end of the movie was build on t-34s platform. Because there only few tigers nowadays that can move. That's why they used this technique.
Anyone else saw a body flying when the russian on the rooftop called for artillery?
Great scenes, Ура товарищи!
veramente fatto mailissimo....che spreco di mezzi per scene assolutamente inverosimili. Un offesa per quelli che ci hanno combattutto davvero a Stalingrado.
Nothing like a day at the tractor factory. Glad I wasn't there in person.
Great Vid !
5 *****
Very professional...well cone
Bloody the eye relief of the girl snipers scope must be something bloody special if she can see with here eye that far back. No reticle in the scope makes for interesting sniping too.
I like how in russian war movies they also give the germans some character.
Помню в детстве только одного ветерана Сталинграда очень нервный был..
@BillKiernan Rough guess, produce lots of smoke making the sight holes in the tank useless meaning someone has to go on top of the turret making him a sniper target, plus the fire and smoke make it harder for infantry to support the panzers, making it easier for soviet infantry to disable to destroy them.
Those little molotovs went up like 500 pound bombs lol
@Eldernesh :D yea in guns of navarone they used m7 greyhounds for panzers
Пулемётчик на бронитранспартере, которого снайпер подстрелила, актёр у которого ещё нет Оскара!!
это разве не Роберт де Ниро?
Так это ж вроде кирк дуглас
нет. И не будет.
Стыдоба! Спилберг бы такую бойню снял! Не могут наши сцены боев снимать абсолютно! Что тогда-что сейчас!
“It’s a piece of cake, just make it easier for men to die.” The Gods of War
Does anyone know where I can watch this movie with English subtitles?
Man will always create reason.
I like the sceene with the lady sniper (4:11). like always :)
OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!
Федька Бондарчук тут ещё по настоящему играет.
I'm seeing a lot of people that don't know how to time stamp. To time Stamp pause the video and put the time of video you would like to stamp as so 2:12
@WiseGuy5674 Haven't seen "The Pacific" but I have "Enemy at the Gates". Both are fascinating movies but Enemy at the Gates was really a crude and rather an amatuer historian perception of real events. I'll have to check out The Pacific :) Thanks for letting me on it, never heard of it before.
3:52 The Guy in the middle of the shot dying... LOL.
yeah, its too difficult to find working, running tiger tanks. Also, technically you can take out a tank using naplam as it heats up to tank and burns the crew/cooks off the ammo (search arab israeli war 1973) so molotovs could possibly have the same effect
Ангелы смерти) You can find it on torrent Russian sites)
At first I was dubious that some Molotov cocktails would have the same explosive power as modern day C4 explosive. But then I had some Soviet era Whadkha.
@SashaVedernikov where can I find it? because I don't now how to change the letters on my computer to russian.
@SashaVedernikov Actually, considering how old is this movie I say I am really impressed. A big improvement over the "German" Pershing tanks used in the Battle of Bulge lol.
Yeah and they got the sand-dunes just right in the snowy winter of 'The Bulge.'
I saw Pacific-great movie. We need to film something similar about the Soviet Army.
@Sturmmann: Those weren't actually meant to be Tigers. they were meant to look like the Panzer IV, which was the mainstay of the Panzer forces then.
Thank you very much! im watching it now, unfortunately the online version i found doesn't have english subtitles and i know very little Russian so i dont quite understand it hahah. But i get the idea.
That is a common problem but the movies are great
Only the Germans have actually made a decent movie about this battle so far. It's a crimes that such a pivotal moment in history is either a love story or propaganda. You feel that one day the Russians will have a version that will be truly mind-blowing, God knows they deserve one.
@SashaVedernikov
oh? well we'll find out in time. do you know who's directing/acting?
Powered Booth is in this too. Wow
2:01 to be honest i would have dived lower into the halftrack after having my helmet blown off my head!
La pelicula parece haber sido hecha en "1952" y no en 2013, las escenas de tiroteo son muy ingenuas; el soldado alemán arriba del carro blindado que abre los brazos y se inclina cuando es alcanzado. Los tiradores que alzan un casco para hacer caer al enemigo. Las escenas de ataque parecen hechas al gusto de Stalin quien al parecer no ha muerto y esta disfrutando este film, ya que cuando los rusos atacan aparece un enjambre humano y nadie vacila y todos parecen competir entre sí por ir adelante. En definitiva recomendable para todo niño ruso nieto de comisarios.
La pelicula del 2013 es una version nueva de un film sovietico de los 70, se transmitio en canal 22 con el titulo de imagenes de una vida, la version del 2013 es mas violenta, algunas de sus esenas se usaron para videos de canciones como la guerra sagrada y la division de la guardia
Esta película es de 1990, dirigida por Yuri Ozerov. La que tú dices es la de 2013, titulada también Stalingrado porque ambas están ambientadas en la misma batalla.
@@ekhozo6850 gracias por la correccion
the acting, oh gahd the acting.
well that, gentleman is superb russian acting
at least the scene of the Howitzer firing looks better done than any movie of wwii made by hollywood
Great movie,where can I get a dvd of this film?
What movie was this from? And the year it was made! I haven't seen this one.
@BrianWilsonJacob I think tiger tanks were used in limted numbers around stalingrad but you can tell they ment them to be Panzer MkIII's because the turrent is clearly that of a Tiger and not a PIII
like "enemy at the gates" attack scene
☝
But with old movies
@BillKiernan Also bullets wouldn't light cocktails of, that's like bullets making barrels explode in video games. Or 3-4 rockets taking out a tank, its inaccurate, mostly done for looks.
@ralfisloved Let me see if I can anwer that question. The fact its in WWII using the right equipment in the movie of that times is historically accurate. As far as actual combat events it was scripted from WW2 vets from different units in different battles. Historically accurate in a sense of the times and what men had to go through but fictional in actual events displayed.
@jonastti that's true, Yuri Ozerov the director couldn't find any Pz III or Pz IV so they built tiger on a t-34 just for the movie.
Funny movie, at 12 sec i have seen so many fake hybrid kingtiger turret on a unknow body tank-t34? and at 1.29 very exposure russian sniper.....and a kill....
This like American Musical Westside Story. Very pretty dancing.
looks like a good movie.. Would watch it of its got English subtitles :-j
@SashaVedernikov
i agree and i apreciate that
but you cannot deny that final battle scene's focus is on hollywood tragedy and not realism
cutre
there are two movies called stalingrad wich one is this?
The mother of the battles.
4:20 best scene
cool
It was the based true of story World War 2
boy that Soviet officer looks like Powers Booth.
+Greg Torrez Thats him in fact
***** are you sure about that? Isn't this a Russian made film?
Greg Torrez
Yes it's Soviet made. Here is from the Wiki on the film regarding Booth "Due to the harsh economic conditions in the late 1980s Soviet Union, Ozerov was unable to secure funding for his film inside the USSR. After deliberations, he approached the American Warner Brothers for assistance. The company agreed to provide financial support, but demanded that American actors would be given representation. The reluctant director had to cast Powers Boothe for the title role of General Vasily Chuikov.[4] The film was the first Soviet-American co-production in the Perestroika era"
***** ha! Vasily Chuikov being portrayed by Rev. Jim Jones of the People's Temple and the reluctant National Guardsman from Southern Comfort.
That's because it is Powers Booth
@SashaVedernikov Oh shit...LOL my reply was meant at enoching7
D-Day on SPR was for the most part dead on - no arguing. Band of Brothers was realistic but not accurate as in historically that I'm aware of. Its based off parajumpers behind enemy lines and their compilation of stories all rolled into one. Stil damn good job.
Once again, my comment was at enoching7 cause me and you see eye to eye
Well, night comrad :)
@strizhi actually band of brothers is based on a true story about easy company in the 101st airborne division of which they took part in d-day, market garden and the battle of the bulge. I'd know that because i own the dvd boxset. Plus it's also based on a book researched by stephen e ambrose.
is the 1990 stalingrad the one quincy jones produced
Hello, is that I might have the title of this movie, please, which I think is a Russian film
The creepiest music at the beginning eva
any 1 know where i can find this movie and a mosin-nagnant?
@blakdust3 You can take out some tanks (light ones) with Molotovs
МаринаНеелова точно
@dachefffkoch yeah the infantry was huge, however Soviet Union was losing in 1941-42 because:
1. Soviet military doctrine focused mainly on offense rather than defense. They built a lot of tanks, airplanes in the beginning of the war and kept them close to the Western border of the Soviet Union in order to advance.
Since Germans invaded and captured those territories a lot of tanks, airplanes, supplies were destroyed/captured.
2. The Great Purge of 1937. Stalin's repressions
3. Unawarness.
ako sa vola tento film?
I like WWI soviet films... please, can anybody tell which film is this...?
3:01 actor dives almost as good as an NBA player.
Hurra!!!!!
God forbids we ever face such a thing in our backyard. God ..This movie is 10 times more intense than cross of iron.
***** seems pretty dramatized to me, not Hollywood but Russian equivalent, either way they both exaggerate to make things exciting
***** It's goofy and inaccurate but it's not 'exaggerated.' Read accounts of how the fighting went in Stalingrad and this is like watching a school play in comparison.
It is from Stalingrad! Read the description
the Russian front undoubtedly was the deadliest during WW2
What is the exact name of this movie? ive been trying to find it online but i always find the German made "Stalingrad" movie, please inbox!
@Eldernesh actually Tigers were not deployed in battle until Kursk. Interestingly enough the Tiger tank took many inspirations from the T-34
первые тигры были под Ленинградом зимой 1942 года.Один захватили Советские солдаты.
@nath6644 SPR is infact realistic if u think about it, i mean in the final battle of ramelle they planned step by step with machine guns and mines and positions etc etc, plus they would lose if not the other troops arrived
@WwAste 6:53 is awesome did u see the gu go flying?? epic
wich stalingrad is this? because theres another with the same name about the germans.
Liked how every german tank looked like a king tiger.
As you can see from our comments there are tons of different information sources and we can't know for sure which one is right, but I'm going to go with my sources.
what is the name of the movie?
Not as much as you would think. They haven't been in a lot of wars that they don't need to be in. Mostly against terrorists.
@SashaVedernikov damn strait!
@blakdust3 u can, back in the day the bottum of the tank was their weakness and im guessing thats where they put their gas tanks
@SashaVedernikov true,the tiger thank from spr looks half the size of a real tiger
When was this movie? The only Eastern Front WWII movies that I'm familiar with is Enemy at the Gates and Stalingrad (The German perspective one starring Thomas Krestmann). Rest are black and white ones made during and after the war.