Hi Tom, I wanted to say you did a great job with the pod cast. I like that you stood your ground at the end with recording the out of body and why it’s not good to make it into a show and it actually makes it less believable. I think people are scared sometimes to question people in positions of “power” like Joe has. I believe like you say evolution is inevitable and your message with get out into the masses no what where or who gives it an outlet. Also you are not alone, don’t put too much pressure on yourself but I am sure you already know this. So much love to you and your team ❤
Please make a list of questions with timestamps as a standard! It would make the firechat much more useful to those of us who don't have time to listen to all of it :)
In quiet grace, their presence stays, No boasts or words to fill the air, Joe and Thomas, guiding lights, Their deeds shine bright beyond compare. Through halls of thought, they walk so wise, Reflecting truths we long to know, A mirror clear where wisdom lies, Awakening life to help us grow. For leadership’s no shouted cry, But a steady, kindly flame, It lights the paths where spirits fly, To seek the source from which we came. So here’s to those who lead so pure, With quiet hearts and strength unseen, They gently show the sage secure, Within us all, love ❤
You not going to understand tv drama if you watch only one you have watched every day so many to get to know when you know story of the drama you started figuring it out what producers trying to tell you so keep listening tom and other like him then you will have bigger picture but it’s never end maybe we’ll never know 100% nature but you will have enough to live your life more stable and satisfied
Hi Tom a friend found something inconsistent in your talks - the idea that information from the which way needs to be collected is either an experiment which has not been done yet and you have not seen - or as you said in Calgary reality 101 was done and the result was the same diffraction pattern ???
Hi Tom. I saw some of your talk on Joe Rogan. Intriguing. I have to say, without being disrespectful, I make the comment that your presentation was all over the place. The opening, and the discussion about the journey that you and your colleague took separately, but, in what I call the other dimensions, was fascinating. Your dismissal of Joe's suggestion about a recording of that encounter, or similar encounters was extremely disappointing. No doubt, in the light of your many experiences, you don't attach much weight to it, but, as a newcomer to the notion I was disappointed that you did not really consider it at all. I regard myself as reasonably intelligent, but your explanations, and discussion generally, was full of technical language, and, to me, at least, unintelligible. What a pity. I had to give up on the podcast after a while, because I couldn't make head nor tail of what you were talking about. I should say, I have a passing interest in how this applies to Everything but rather the intuitive and meditative nature of your theory, and discoveries. I shall search to see if I can find a more user friendly explanation of the whole notion.
nothing is perfect , even the source or God, this is the lesson we should take now in my opinion, to explain the theory wasn't easy , but in general the talk went good, so it's just a part of you who's waiting for the perfect coach or the perfect god's messenger, if you had already listen to tom for so many hours and understood his theory, don't judge him by one podcast. i understand your feelings, just pay attention to disappointments, when there is disappoint, there is high expectancy and perfection.
Hi junior. The JRE interview was a bit all over the place, I agree. Not to mention Tom's work can seem convoluted and bizarre if you're new to this topic. I highly recommend Robert Monroe's books. I came upon MBT through initially listening to Monroe's trilogy, and it was a good launching point.They're not told from the perspective of a Physicist and aren't a highly technical scientific model; but a compendium of his diaries about his Out-of-Body Experiences. They're scientific enough in that Monroe was an engineer and attempts to take a logical approach, the best he can, to what is purely subjective experience.
A huge amount of ground covered. I would assume way over the capacity of someone who hasn't spent the last 20 years researching these topics. He could have talked 3 hours on discernment alone. Not to mention development and application. A curious mind will never be slowed by concepts outside their grasp, quite the opposite in my personal experience ❤
Hello Tom, I have been a fan of your work for about as long as I've been a listener of Joe Rogan (so 12 years now). As a fan of both of you, i have been waiting for years for you two to meet and have a discussion together. Now what i am going to say may seem a little harsh but I promise my feedback is so that the next Joe Rogan podcast turns out better than this one which I was a little disappointed in, to be honest. I'm truly rooting for you and your message! I know your MBT covers everything, and you like to take ample amounts of time to say as many words as possible, but what Joe likes is a conversation. You were trying to pour as many concepts down his throat as possible in the time you had, but it came out unstructured, too long, and hard to listen to. Leave space for Joe to talk more and come up with insights of his own before you dive down another MBT rabbit hole. And when Joe finally does make a comment or tries to get a question across, don't be too quick to answer. Joe likes to take time, as you do, to formulate a thought and a question he is satisfied with. In essence, leave more time for him to think out loud and ask follow-up questions. The more you do the better Joe will appreciate you (he truly hates when guests cut him off mid-thought) and the better chance you have of being a repeat guest for a long time. Secondly, never ever be dismissive of Joe's arguments or insights. That is a sure way to never be invited again. That last segment after he asked you why you wouldn't agree to do repeat dual explorations was truly awful. You dismissed Joe without giving him a satisfying explanation as to why you thought this wasn't a long-term solution and promptly went on to basically perform a live Ad placement for Cusac. Joe absolutely hates it when guests hijack his show to market themselves. He may have given you a nice comment about digesting the information but my guess is the conversation was over on his end because you went full ad placement for Cusac. He even tested you by saying all you needed is a google search but you insisted that people go to Cusac.org. It's Joe's show and he's very protective of it. As soon as you dismiss him and he feels like he isn't controlling the conversation, you're out. That is exactly what happened. One last thing i'd like to mention is Jamie. Now for many podcasts the guy behind the scene is just a guy. But on the Joe Rogan show Jamie is THE GUY and Joe (and his viewership) love him as much, if not more than Joe. Whenever you ask to get your slides set up to talk about it's Jamie you're talking to, not Joe's "guy". His name is Jamie. The more respect and attention you give to Jamie while asking him to set up those slides, the better Joe, Jamie, and the entirety of Joe's viewership will like you. That i can absolutely guarantee! As an example of a perfect guest and a perfect appearance on the Joe Rogan Show, go watch Randall Carlson's appearances on Joe's show. That is essentially how your conversation with Joe needs to flow if you want him to keep inviting you to tell your story. I apologize if what I'm saying sounds a little harsh, but I would hate to see you put aside from Joe's show because you failed to adapt to Joe's ways. I hope you take these thoughts into consideration, and I hope to see you on his podcast again!
Wow. So are you an agent for the show? I think Joe seemed to understand Tom more than you do. You are not in Joe's head no matter how long you've listened to his show. I think it would be up to Joe and his staff to give pointers . Not some anonymous commenter who doesn't understand the subject. Your pejorative framing of the show is subjective and using phrasing like " not to be disrespectful" and then being rude is passive aggressive. I think this work is above your understanding
@@helloitsme7983 I haven't used this "not to be disrespectful" phrasing, that's another comment. I know my message may come as over-critical and negative, but what i hoped to share was constructive criticism of what i witnessed in this interaction between two people that I've watched for thousands of hours (each) and that I've come to get to know quite well (at least their on-screen persona). In the same way that i know how Tom will answer a question about chakras and "energetics" (because i've seen that question answered dozens of times), I have also come to understand how Joe reacts to certain behaviors (because I've watched him react in the same ways again and again and again). My feedback may be completely dismissed because I'm just an internet stranger with nothing of substance to bring to the discussion, but I feel that my feedback is fair, and I hope that Tom may at least consider it for a minute. This discussion between Joe and Tom may be the start of something beautiful and great for MBT and for the world. I would hate for this opportunity to be wasted because Tom failed to do some research on the kind of social setting he is stepping into. I wish nothing but the best to Tom and his team and will continue to support MBT as I have always done.
I was delighted to see Tom on such a huge podcast, however, I have to say that Tom wandered a bit too much as well as repeated himself. Maybe had Joe been more versed in the theory, he, as an exceptional interviewer, could have created parameters or structure so Tom wouldn’t have wandered so much. Bit disappointed overall with the podcast
I think the interview was great. Without the interview, I would have never been introduced to Tom. While I didn't know exactly where the podcast was going to end up in the beginning, I'm glad I stuck to it. It's very intriguing for sure
I’m so excited you finally got on Joe Rogan!!! So many new people got to hear yours and Bob’s experiences 😆
I thought the podcast was great. It was amazing to finally see Tom on there. Looking forward to the next one!
Hi Tom, I wanted to say you did a great job with the pod cast. I like that you stood your ground at the end with recording the out of body and why it’s not good to make it into a show and it actually makes it less believable. I think people are scared sometimes to question people in positions of “power” like Joe has. I believe like you say evolution is inevitable and your message with get out into the masses no what where or who gives it an outlet. Also you are not alone, don’t put too much pressure on yourself but I am sure you already know this. So much love to you and your team ❤
It's nice when the guests just get straight to the question without a lot of preamble
Please make a list of questions with timestamps as a standard! It would make the firechat much more useful to those of us who don't have time to listen to all of it :)
Thanks!
Great question from Cheryl Bailey she's awesome. Great chat uncle Tom. 😊
Thanks.
In quiet grace, their presence stays,
No boasts or words to fill the air,
Joe and Thomas, guiding lights,
Their deeds shine bright beyond compare.
Through halls of thought, they walk so wise,
Reflecting truths we long to know,
A mirror clear where wisdom lies,
Awakening life to help us grow.
For leadership’s no shouted cry,
But a steady, kindly flame,
It lights the paths where spirits fly,
To seek the source from which we came.
So here’s to those who lead so pure,
With quiet hearts and strength unseen,
They gently show the sage secure,
Within us all, love ❤
I thought being on Joe Rogan would have put you over 100,000 subscribers. But your nearly there.
I went on the CUSAC site could not find any Ai there.
You not going to understand tv drama if you watch only one you have watched every day so many to get to know when you know story of the drama you started figuring it out what producers trying to tell you so keep listening tom and other like him then you will have bigger picture but it’s never end maybe we’ll never know 100% nature but you will have enough to live your life more stable and satisfied
Hi Tom a friend found something inconsistent in your talks - the idea that information from the which way needs to be collected is either an experiment which has not been done yet and you have not seen - or as you said in Calgary reality 101 was done and the result was the same diffraction pattern ???
Hi Tom. I saw some of your talk on Joe Rogan. Intriguing. I have to say, without being disrespectful, I make the comment that your presentation was all over the place. The opening, and the discussion about the journey that you and your colleague took separately, but, in what I call the other dimensions, was fascinating. Your dismissal of Joe's suggestion about a recording of that encounter, or similar encounters was extremely disappointing. No doubt, in the light of your many experiences, you don't attach much weight to it, but, as a newcomer to the notion I was disappointed that you did not really consider it at all. I regard myself as reasonably intelligent, but your explanations, and discussion generally, was full of technical language, and, to me, at least, unintelligible. What a pity. I had to give up on the podcast after a while, because I couldn't make head nor tail of what you were talking about. I should say, I have a passing interest in how this applies to Everything but rather the intuitive and meditative nature of your theory, and discoveries. I shall search to see if I can find a more user friendly explanation of the whole notion.
nothing is perfect , even the source or God, this is the lesson we should take now in my opinion,
to explain the theory wasn't easy , but in general the talk went good,
so it's just a part of you who's waiting for the perfect coach or the perfect god's messenger,
if you had already listen to tom for so many hours and understood his theory, don't judge him by one podcast.
i understand your feelings, just pay attention to disappointments, when there is disappoint, there is high expectancy and perfection.
i can understand toms reaction.
"Siddhis are for Children"
neem karoli baba
Hi junior. The JRE interview was a bit all over the place, I agree. Not to mention Tom's work can seem convoluted and bizarre if you're new to this topic.
I highly recommend Robert Monroe's books. I came upon MBT through initially listening to Monroe's trilogy, and it was a good launching point.They're not told from the perspective of a Physicist and aren't a highly technical scientific model; but a compendium of his diaries about his Out-of-Body Experiences.
They're scientific enough in that Monroe was an engineer and attempts to take a logical approach, the best he can, to what is purely subjective experience.
A huge amount of ground covered. I would assume way over the capacity of someone who hasn't spent the last 20 years researching these topics. He could have talked 3 hours on discernment alone. Not to mention development and application. A curious mind will never be slowed by concepts outside their grasp, quite the opposite in my personal experience ❤
Your first mistake is listening to Joe Rogan
Can like 'talk' to animals. Channelling is before the load order of mathematics; collapse is a post-process.
Hello Tom,
I have been a fan of your work for about as long as I've been a listener of Joe Rogan (so 12 years now). As a fan of both of you, i have been waiting for years for you two to meet and have a discussion together. Now what i am going to say may seem a little harsh but I promise my feedback is so that the next Joe Rogan podcast turns out better than this one which I was a little disappointed in, to be honest. I'm truly rooting for you and your message!
I know your MBT covers everything, and you like to take ample amounts of time to say as many words as possible, but what Joe likes is a conversation. You were trying to pour as many concepts down his throat as possible in the time you had, but it came out unstructured, too long, and hard to listen to. Leave space for Joe to talk more and come up with insights of his own before you dive down another MBT rabbit hole. And when Joe finally does make a comment or tries to get a question across, don't be too quick to answer. Joe likes to take time, as you do, to formulate a thought and a question he is satisfied with. In essence, leave more time for him to think out loud and ask follow-up questions. The more you do the better Joe will appreciate you (he truly hates when guests cut him off mid-thought) and the better chance you have of being a repeat guest for a long time.
Secondly, never ever be dismissive of Joe's arguments or insights. That is a sure way to never be invited again. That last segment after he asked you why you wouldn't agree to do repeat dual explorations was truly awful. You dismissed Joe without giving him a satisfying explanation as to why you thought this wasn't a long-term solution and promptly went on to basically perform a live Ad placement for Cusac. Joe absolutely hates it when guests hijack his show to market themselves. He may have given you a nice comment about digesting the information but my guess is the conversation was over on his end because you went full ad placement for Cusac. He even tested you by saying all you needed is a google search but you insisted that people go to Cusac.org.
It's Joe's show and he's very protective of it. As soon as you dismiss him and he feels like he isn't controlling the conversation, you're out. That is exactly what happened.
One last thing i'd like to mention is Jamie. Now for many podcasts the guy behind the scene is just a guy. But on the Joe Rogan show Jamie is THE GUY and Joe (and his viewership) love him as much, if not more than Joe. Whenever you ask to get your slides set up to talk about it's Jamie you're talking to, not Joe's "guy". His name is Jamie. The more respect and attention you give to Jamie while asking him to set up those slides, the better Joe, Jamie, and the entirety of Joe's viewership will like you. That i can absolutely guarantee!
As an example of a perfect guest and a perfect appearance on the Joe Rogan Show, go watch Randall Carlson's appearances on Joe's show. That is essentially how your conversation with Joe needs to flow if you want him to keep inviting you to tell your story.
I apologize if what I'm saying sounds a little harsh, but I would hate to see you put aside from Joe's show because you failed to adapt to Joe's ways. I hope you take these thoughts into consideration, and I hope to see you on his podcast again!
Wow. So are you an agent for the show? I think Joe seemed to understand Tom more than you do. You are not in Joe's head no matter how long you've listened to his show.
I think it would be up to Joe and his staff to give pointers
. Not some anonymous commenter who doesn't understand the subject.
Your pejorative framing of the show is subjective and using phrasing like " not to be disrespectful" and then being rude is passive aggressive. I think this work is above your understanding
@@helloitsme7983 I haven't used this "not to be disrespectful" phrasing, that's another comment.
I know my message may come as over-critical and negative, but what i hoped to share was constructive criticism of what i witnessed in this interaction between two people that I've watched for thousands of hours (each) and that I've come to get to know quite well (at least their on-screen persona).
In the same way that i know how Tom will answer a question about chakras and "energetics" (because i've seen that question answered dozens of times), I have also come to understand how Joe reacts to certain behaviors (because I've watched him react in the same ways again and again and again).
My feedback may be completely dismissed because I'm just an internet stranger with nothing of substance to bring to the discussion, but I feel that my feedback is fair, and I hope that Tom may at least consider it for a minute.
This discussion between Joe and Tom may be the start of something beautiful and great for MBT and for the world. I would hate for this opportunity to be wasted because Tom failed to do some research on the kind of social setting he is stepping into.
I wish nothing but the best to Tom and his team and will continue to support MBT as I have always done.
I was delighted to see Tom on such a huge podcast, however, I have to say that Tom wandered a bit too much as well as repeated himself. Maybe had Joe been more versed in the theory, he, as an exceptional interviewer, could have created parameters or structure so Tom wouldn’t have wandered so much. Bit disappointed overall with the podcast
I think the interview was great. Without the interview, I would have never been introduced to Tom. While I didn't know exactly where the podcast was going to end up in the beginning, I'm glad I stuck to it. It's very intriguing for sure