Mahabharata Unravelled - Ami Ganatra -

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 98

  • @amannegi1218
    @amannegi1218 3 роки тому +35

    This channel is so underrated. It deserves many more subscribers

    • @NiravJoshi
      @NiravJoshi 2 роки тому

      The comment labeling things as underrated is so underrated 😀

  • @thiraviammanikandan1696
    @thiraviammanikandan1696 2 роки тому +5

    "Everybody has opinion on Mahabharatha, but they don't read whole text - 1,00,000 verses; opinion...opinion... well said ji.

  • @harikishan5158
    @harikishan5158 3 роки тому +12

    Ami ganatra ji also has a personal youtube channel,anyone interested in ramayana and mahabharat can check her discussions on the same :) (just type ami ganatra on youtube and you'll find)

  • @prakash999light
    @prakash999light 3 роки тому +16

    Ami Ji. GE. Thoughts flow flawlessly. Sometimes, pause enhances presentation. Well done Keep it up. Always take care. Blessings.

  • @gopalramanathan7062
    @gopalramanathan7062 3 роки тому +12

    An excellent broadcast and a great service for the Dharmics 🕉🙏🏼

  • @sunnybhat4376
    @sunnybhat4376 Рік тому +1

    Every one is busy in defending or making a hero or villian out of character, rather than learning and trying to get crux ...we all have good and bad in us .what comes out of us most of time is what defines us...no one is perfect apart from lord

  • @gautameunni4141
    @gautameunni4141 3 роки тому +27

    This keeping of Mahabharata book at home that may create family feud is a story told in families all over India! It's great, we still have people to scholar this great epic. Thanks, Amiji for unravelling Mahabharata.. :-)

    • @ChannelAyurvedaGauhar
      @ChannelAyurvedaGauhar 2 роки тому +2

      Thats the only reason for our downfall. Only book which should be read by all is mahabharat

    • @000Aful
      @000Aful 2 роки тому +6

      Its actually the opposite. Family feuds have only increased since people have started keeping mahabharata out of their homes. Those who read it actually get to learn the lessons and avoid family feud situations.

    • @gautameunni4141
      @gautameunni4141 2 роки тому

      @@000Aful agreeed! ✌️

  • @tusharrajvanshi1041
    @tusharrajvanshi1041 3 роки тому +7

    Superb. Very educative. Every sanatani should listen it carefully and analyse it. Best wishes Tushar

  • @eswarjosyula8891
    @eswarjosyula8891 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for brining this inspiring talk/interview. Ami-ji certainly makes good points. Reading mahabharata in a non-judgmental way is the first step. This would then lead to inspiring one to lead a clean life, a yogic lifestyle, developing the dharmic wisdom so necessary to deal with dharma-sankat as put forth so nicely by Ami-ji. Life is neither fair nor unfair, it is what it is. With respect for nature and all life, one will accept the outcomes naturally. The scientific process is unfortunately understood to be used for only certain disciplines that have materialistic gains, but the shastra is clear that the scientific process was and should be pervasive across everything we do, particularly for the purushartha leading to the breaking of the cycle of samsara.

  • @sonamlokhande7824
    @sonamlokhande7824 2 роки тому +2

    Thankyou thankyou for the knowledge ❤️❤️

  • @paromitasen7843
    @paromitasen7843 2 роки тому +1

    It's important for all of us to be pragmatic after hearing Ami ji 's explanation of the epics

  • @rajl3131
    @rajl3131 3 роки тому +5

    Great. Thank you. Would like in continuation many more.

  • @itsmovietime3732
    @itsmovietime3732 2 роки тому +4

    Ami ji this is very great initiative started by you , thankyou so much to enhance our knowledge about our great epic Mahabharata please write about Ramayan like this

  • @vandematram8205
    @vandematram8205 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you. This is very valuable indeed

  • @tarunburmanroy1626
    @tarunburmanroy1626 2 роки тому +1

    Understanding of mahabharat is a different way.

  • @acidcrashguy
    @acidcrashguy 2 роки тому

    great talk. traffic noise will destroy india and our peace.

  • @AshishYadav-gz3jq
    @AshishYadav-gz3jq 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for sharing

  • @sameerpatil2001
    @sameerpatil2001 2 роки тому +1

    ❤️❤️❤️

  • @nagatubein
    @nagatubein 2 роки тому +1

    Superb explanation. Apart from Mahabharata and Krishna avatar , what other important event happened in dhuapara Yuga ? Any insight on this madam ?

  • @upendrasharma4996
    @upendrasharma4996 2 роки тому +2

    Nice! Enlightening. Do some commentary on beauty of Sanskrit .

  • @shijuthomas4144
    @shijuthomas4144 3 роки тому +3

    Nice mam please about jerasanda vadham story

  • @moonwalkerindia4919
    @moonwalkerindia4919 3 роки тому +15

    People should read Mahabharat themselves before making a mindset..

  • @gregatri3001
    @gregatri3001 2 роки тому +1

    Great work...where is the original one which is written by ganeshji...if not available how to identify the best source of truth

  • @vanisarada9886
    @vanisarada9886 2 роки тому +3

    Suggest a book on complete Mahabharata which is easy to understand and at the same time books that need to be avoided with false narratives like that of Patnaik.

    • @sushilsojwal3207
      @sushilsojwal3207 2 роки тому

      Read Ramesh Menon's Mahabharat..volumes 1&2...an abridged transliteration.

    • @jonalidas1482
      @jonalidas1482 2 роки тому

      Read bibek debroy's english translation of bori ce mahabharat

  • @sontu5288
    @sontu5288 2 роки тому

    Great Research Maam

  • @KaalBhairav-oo3mk
    @KaalBhairav-oo3mk Рік тому

    informative

  • @nandpriyadevidasi4954
    @nandpriyadevidasi4954 2 роки тому +2

    Saifali Khan should hear this.

  • @kishansingh-nr6xk
    @kishansingh-nr6xk 2 роки тому +2

    Very educative discussion How to connect 🙄 with this institution

  • @rajnikant-kc6xp
    @rajnikant-kc6xp 2 роки тому

    🙏

  • @conquerors5716
    @conquerors5716 2 роки тому

    👍👍

  • @abhasood2044
    @abhasood2044 2 роки тому +1

    Ami जी आपका बहुत धन्यावाद जो आपने महाभारत पर रिसर्च की। महाभारत जैसे ग्रंथ में बहुत सी भ्रांतियां है। आशा है कि इनका निवारण हो जाएगा ।
    परंतु महाभारत English के स्थान पर हिन्दी में पढ़ने में उत्तम रहेगा।
    तो प्रश्न है कि हिंदी version कब आएगा?

  • @aniljay8699
    @aniljay8699 2 роки тому +1

    How to subscribe these beautiful narrative

  • @anshoe
    @anshoe 2 роки тому

    🙏🏼🕉

  • @acharyadr.ajayanand2659
    @acharyadr.ajayanand2659 2 роки тому +1

    अमी जी, अपनी पुस्तक को हिन्दी में भी निकालिये. जिससे कई लोग पढ़े.

  • @gregatri3001
    @gregatri3001 2 роки тому

    Nagaloka has reference in mahabharat..like kunti was from nagalok, arjun marry girl from nagalok, krishna arjun killed too many nagas to establish khandav to indrapeastha, jaanmajay killed too many nagas where mahabharat first recited...any important exact location of nagas loka in mahabharat

  • @San_Dude
    @San_Dude Рік тому +2

    Can you talk about Nakul and Sehdev
    Their skills and breavry and characters and capabilities like other warriors

  • @Krishna-lo9dt
    @Krishna-lo9dt 2 роки тому

    bay area had only 2 to 3 shows in a day but on public demand and houseful shows now there are 7 to 8 shows. Everyone put pressure in nearby cinema halls for more screens/shows. WhyGangubai got 3000+ screens but Kashmir Files got only 500 screens? #BoycottGutterwood

  • @TTF1625
    @TTF1625 2 роки тому +2

    Where can I get original Mahabharat and its English translation??? Can anyone guide me?

    • @boogiewoogie4984
      @boogiewoogie4984 2 роки тому +1

      Geeta press produces near authentic translations of our scriptures.

    • @pratikchavda
      @pratikchavda 2 роки тому +3

      BORI (Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute , Pune) critial edition consider as most authentic mahabharata. I have started reading part 1.

    • @economicsadda7376
      @economicsadda7376 2 роки тому +2

      @@pratikchavda no they have distorted some fact they don't know have knowledge of sanskrit.

    • @jonalidas1482
      @jonalidas1482 2 роки тому +2

      @@economicsadda7376 they have just removed some fake things which aren't facts actually.
      And you are saying that they don't know sanskrit

    • @San_Dude
      @San_Dude Рік тому

      @@pratikchavda BORI Is not authentic
      It's fake
      Read ved vyas

  • @suryakantvapilkar3196
    @suryakantvapilkar3196 2 роки тому

    Dear Ami Madam, is your book Mahabharat Unravelled available in Hindi?

  • @Raji_Be_woke
    @Raji_Be_woke 2 роки тому

    बहन जी द्रोपदी को जुए में लगाने का सच बताईए 🙏🙏🙏

  • @aronwilliam8547
    @aronwilliam8547 2 роки тому

    In the BCE Map India was located at the end of Europe. So did it move to East?

    • @gururajkini1127
      @gururajkini1127 2 роки тому

      May be it was Akhand Bharat which was earlier india...

    • @aronwilliam8547
      @aronwilliam8547 2 роки тому

      @@gururajkini1127 so the place Indians live today is not Bharat Varsha? Or akhand Bharat whatever.

    • @gururajkini1127
      @gururajkini1127 2 роки тому

      @@aronwilliam8547 what i meant was previously bharat was not only todays india it was more than that later on mughals came destroyed britishers came divided etc.. happened..

    • @aronwilliam8547
      @aronwilliam8547 2 роки тому

      @@gururajkini1127 that is not the answer. Please read the question correctly.

    • @gururajkini1127
      @gururajkini1127 2 роки тому

      @@aronwilliam8547 then i dont know bro could you please share the map even i would like to see

  • @aronwilliam8547
    @aronwilliam8547 2 роки тому

    And the scriptures were in Brahmari. My senior to whom I intern spent years to Desipher two verse, since doesn't know any indian languages and ancient pali prakrit are lost language how cum you people get the reading in current style of writing?

    • @aronwilliam8547
      @aronwilliam8547 2 роки тому

      @@uccforbharat9664 you don't seem to understand my question at all. Please read it again.

  • @mriawaltyr1485
    @mriawaltyr1485 2 роки тому

    Wish it was all in English very hard to understand the whole story

  • @mikesheth77
    @mikesheth77 2 роки тому

    Mahabharat even the original composition by Veda Vyasa must be the composition of many authors. It covers storey going back to Urvashi Pururva mentioned in Rigveda. Same Vedvyasa who divided Vedas into four!Admitted material is old but sanskrit language is mostly classical with numerous words of Dravidian origin. Even word Hidamba sounds Telugu to me!! It's final composition upto Pandavas going to heaven via Himalayas must have been of Gupta period! And add later story recited to Janmejaya by Vaishampayan! Original composition was decatated by Vedavyasa to Sri Ganeshji!

  • @skilltopguide9738
    @skilltopguide9738 Рік тому +1

    Dear viewers, after reading my opinion don’t compare the Morality with the Skill. Both are completely different things. All the following incidents are described here on the basis of ‘Skill’ only.
    1. Arjun was defeated 3 times & reached almost near to death situation by Karn on 17th day as these :-
    A. Karna cut Gandiv’s strings 11 times, but Gandivs had 100 strings , it means if Gandiv had only one string then Arjun was killed by Karn for next ten times. But no need of ten times, Arjun had only one head and only because of 100 strings in Gandiv Arjun was survived. Obviously it was defeating of Arjuna.
    B. Arjun was failure to measure tha ‘Nagastra’ of Karna so Krishna saved him. It was sure deed of Arjun. Obviously it was 100% defeating of Arjuna.
    C. Arjun was failure to protect himself from Karna’s last special ‘Bayabia (wind) Arrow’ and he became senseless then Gandiv was fallen from his hand. Karna watched all, he became merciful to Arjuna and left his own Bijay Dhanusa and started to lift his chariot wheel. Obviously it was 100% defeating of Arjuna.
    2. Arjun always used to go through 7 Divine advantages as : (A). Divine Dhanus. (B). Divine Akshay Tunir, (C). Divine Sarathi (Krishna), (D). Divine Dhwaja Dhari & Protector ( Hanuman Ji ), (E). Divine chariot, (F) Divine Boon ( By Lord Shiva ), (G) Divine Kabach ( Brambha Kabach). But Karn Only had a Divine Dhanus, and he used it only on 17th day and the end of the last fight : Arjun defeated and became senseless by Karna’s arrow and after seeing it Karna put his Dhanus on ground and started to pick up the wheel of his chariot.
    3. On 13th day Abhimanyu had two special Divine advantages. A. Almost Unbreakable divine ‘Kabach’ , & B. Rudra dhanus. But Karn broke Abhimanyu’s Dhanus by using his ordinary Bow to bring equality. Without two Divine advantages Abhimanyu was LESS THAN KARN and he never tried to face with Karn before that day. Both have proofs. If anyone wants then I can give it from Bori edition, KMG & Gita Press.
    4. On the day of Gandharva fight , Karn killed thousands of Gandharva without his Vijay Dhanus & even he was drunk. It was made an easy situation for Arjun to defeat the rest of Gandhava. So at least 50 % credit about wining on Gandharva goes to KARNA. after few years later Karna again win on Gandharva in “Digbijoy Yatra’.
    5. Ghatotkach was defeated by Karn 2 times, then he started to hiding himself again & again but at last he was killed by Karn - all have proofs. Obviously Ghatotkach gifted the life to Arjun by his own death.
    6. Bheem was defeated by Karn for 5 times, among them two was in duet fight & next 3 were - 1 vs 14 Rathi / Maharathi fight,where Karn was alone, and in Bheem’s team there were more than 14 rathi /maharathi including Satyaki, Dristhadumna, Nakul, Sahadeb, Yudhisthir, Sikhandi Uttamauja, Yudhamannu, and others - but all were defeated by Karn.
    7. Satyaki defeated by Karn 3 times when Satyaki was with his Pandav team ( 14 Rathi/ Maharathi including Bheem) - but all were defeated.
    8. At the day of Jaydrath badh Arjun, Bheem & Satyaki were fighting jointly with Alone Karn but they were not ableing to win, however Arjun was using his Gandiv but Karn was using an ordinary bow because according to Mahavarat Karn used Vijay Dhanus only at 17th day. At last Arjun killed Karn’s Sarathi & Horses so Karn left his chariot, however nobody could kill Arjun’s Sarathi ( Krishna ) & Horses because both had divine power, so actually Arjun, Bheem & Satyaki jointly were not won in that day against Karn.
    9. In Birat fight, first of all Arjun prayed to lord Hanuman to come in his chariot to make the protection shield and in that fight Arjun was in female’s form by which the whole fight was effected and specially for KARNA obviously who would never apply his actual power against the person who was carrying a female character and female dresses.
    10. No result came on the conflict between Karn & Arjun in Draupadi Syambar at last. Nobody win & nobody defeat at the end, neither Karn nor the Arjun was gain or loss by this fight, no body’s Bow was cut by the opponent and nobody was hurt at the end by the opponent in this fight according to Bori Critical, KMG & Gitapress. However Arjun started the fight by hurting Karn with 3 arrows when Karn was just coming for fight but then Karn came & stood in front of Arjun and started to give answers & the result was absolutely draw. But according to Veel Mahavarat - Karna won the battle against Arjuna in Draupadi Syambar and Krishna saved Arjuna at last by his speech therapy.
    Friends if I am wrong and different from VasDev Mahavarat, then show me the real from VasDev Mahavarat please. I am also requesting & challenging both to Ami Ganatra if she has answers against my above points.

  • @vamshibolte7
    @vamshibolte7 3 роки тому

    Yadhi hasthi thadhanyatra yanne hasthi na thath kvachith

  • @SS-yb1qd
    @SS-yb1qd 2 роки тому

    Hi

  • @himanshusojitra
    @himanshusojitra 2 роки тому

    हिंदी में सुनने समझने में जो आनंद है वो अंग्रेजी में नहीं। अमी जी जब हिन्दी में बोलेंगी तब मैं पूरा सुनुगा।

  • @user-pz2fe7en7c
    @user-pz2fe7en7c 2 роки тому

    आप पहले हिंदी में व्याख्या करती थी बहुत अच्छा था। लेकिन अंग्रेजी में समझाकर निराश किया।कृपया हिन्दी में समझाये ।🙏

  • @sushilsojwal3207
    @sushilsojwal3207 2 роки тому

    Wish her voice was not so shrill and screechy...

    • @ni3070
      @ni3070 2 роки тому +1

      I love her voice, it has joy

  • @victortheimmoral
    @victortheimmoral 2 роки тому

    Dislike karne wala gadha kaun hai ??

  • @SS-yb1qd
    @SS-yb1qd 2 роки тому

    Ye sab hawa ki bate band karo. I just clicked on this video just to see you cutie pie.

  • @rohitdhiman5925
    @rohitdhiman5925 2 роки тому +1

    drona refused to give brahma weapon to karna because he was partial towards arjuna !!!!!!
    and he said only kshatriya and brahman deserve brahmastra
    nowhere it is mentioned that karna was not capable to hold the weapon
    karna was jealous same as arjuna was of eklavya
    they were kids only , it was natural
    correct me if I am wrong

    • @gururajkini1127
      @gururajkini1127 2 роки тому +1

      Drona hasnt taught his own son how take take back brahma weapon have you ever thought about it why?

    • @gururajkini1127
      @gururajkini1127 2 роки тому

      Can you please show me where in adiparva its mentioned that dtona refused because he was not kshatriya...

    • @rohitdhiman5925
      @rohitdhiman5925 2 роки тому

      @@gururajkini1127 it is mention in Shanti parva when narada Muni was telling the Pandavas about the life of karna after his death .
      Aswathama already knew brahmastra
      He didn't knew how to take back the
      brahmashir astra .
      Both are different 1 brahmashir is equal to 4 brahmastra

    • @elonmusk7141
      @elonmusk7141 2 роки тому +1

      @@rohitdhiman5925 konsi mahabharat padi hi tune

    • @rohitdhiman5925
      @rohitdhiman5925 2 роки тому

      @@elonmusk7141 kyu kaunsi padni chahiye
      Aap hi bata dijiye ?

  • @umeshgangwar3263
    @umeshgangwar3263 2 роки тому

    Only a fool can call Mahabharat a History. You will miss the essence of it.

    • @GauravJha-mu5gv
      @GauravJha-mu5gv 2 роки тому +3

      She didn't say that. As I understand, she was saying that Mahabharata contains history with improvised storytelling.

    • @GauravJha-mu5gv
      @GauravJha-mu5gv 2 роки тому

      @Abhinandan Zambare
      Mahabharata is a fiction mixed up with some historical facts. There are so many descriptions that cannot be real. Story of Gandhari giving birth to 100 sons and so many more can be understood only as fiction not as a fact.

    • @rsn4189
      @rsn4189 2 роки тому +4

      @@GauravJha-mu5gv why can't Gandhari have 100 children? They were all test tube babies. Its the developed science of those times we don't understand. When people don't understand something they prefer to call it myth and move away. But that doesn't changes the fact that Mahabharata is the glorious history of Bharatvarsh. Thousands of proofs are there. See we have found Krishna's Dwarka as well exactly in the same state as written by ved Vyas ji.

    • @gururajkini1127
      @gururajkini1127 2 роки тому +1

      @@GauravJha-mu5gv did you know how she gave birth to 101 children... when people dont understand science they say its fiction.. our fore fore fore fore fathers way better than us just for an example chk about stambh of ashoka even till date they dont know what type of metal is used .. as its not rusted till date.. just see the temples carvings etc.. so its that a fiction as well

  • @lexcontours4598
    @lexcontours4598 2 роки тому

    👍👍