well, a lot of matches happen on house shows and never air. When WWE is on tour they repeat the same matches and results over and over again, often with the simple finish of 'heel loses, happy crowd' or multi man tag matches. So it doesn't really indicate WWE burying a star or not having faith in them. It just shows that they are using someone very consistently in their programing which is a very good thing for a wrestlers career ...
So the trend from the 1990s....the more matches you lost likely meant the bigger the push😂. Alot of these losses came off screen especially house shows where they mostly book to send the fans home happy especially where heels were concerned. And probably look it up , many of the losses came from DQs, Count outs, some pins. Many times over the year you look up any rival losing to another every single night in a different city. Example in 1994 into 1995 Owen Hart got beat by his brother over 100 times in that span. Yet Owen still ascends as King of the Ring in 1995. Riding off one huge win over Bret in the opening match of Wrestlemania X where Brett still became champ that night.
It made sense for The Rock despite being Heel he was still scratching the surface as part of NoD but after losing the IC Title he got his stepping stone to Main Event status & World Title picture
Surprisingly that Bray Wyatt didn't make the list with how he used to get booked. However list shows it's always about how you finish not how you start
It doesn't seem to crazy to say the people with high loses tend to be popular. I mean Curt Hawkins had a loss streak and that gained him the most polularity he had in WWE.
It's funny how many of these loss record holders are/were World Champions and/or HoF members/legends, yet fanboys still get their knickers in a bunch at Road Dogg saying that wins and losses don't matter.
Yeah they do. Stone cold went home based on losing one match. Hogan never was seen losing on tv in 80s neither roddy. Ask yourself how many times you say cena lose as world champion in his heyday.
Randy was booked against Triple H, Batista and Cena for 8 out of the 12 months in 2009. They were Vince’s guys, so he booked Randy to look weak against them, even though he and CM Punk were the two hottest guys in the company at the time.
@@dxfifa Roman Reigns with the Bloodline, Triple H with the McMahon-Helmsley Era and Evolution, Hollywood Hogan with the nWo, Bret Hart with the Hart Foundation, Shawn Michaels with DX, etc. Examples of wrestlers who were leading a heel stable and almost never lost. Yet for some reason, they had Randy frequently lose on PPV, TV and house shows in 2009, despite being arguably the top star and having Rhodes and DiBiase to back him up. Legacy were treated as an absolute joke. They never even won the Tag Titles while they were a stable.
Shelton Benjamin's shocked me the least, because I remember how they booked him as the guy to help push the real person they're trying to push. Also he was pushed as a heel.
These aren’t *THAT* shocking to me really… though it’s funny that WL kept dropping “staggering/stunning/etc” for loss counts in the 120’s but opted to just say “163 in total” for Tyler Breeze and merely “a ton of losses with 160” for Seth A good way to build a sniveling heel is to give them a bunch of losses and have them complain about it, but you also have heels get their comeuppance on a regular basis if you’re trying to build up a face that’s been put through the ringer Likewise a face can be handed relentless defeats and given an underdog manner of handling it to garner sympathy or relatability as they then face opposition from heels as they eventually build momentum I’m stunned that Curt Hawkins losing streak only made the list once with 128 losses, but I guess he was a good example of longterm booking since it took a few years to hit his still standing record of 269 consecutive losses There was also a TON of 50/50 booking through a lot of these years, so that adds up when you’re on TV constantly
So whats this mean? They lost that many matches? I mean not everyone wrestles all the time. Youre telling me like the rock.. 115, that means he was on tv and recorded these matches and 115 were losses? In 365 days he lost once ever 3 days?? 3 days?? They wrestle like once a week or twice i believe. What am i missing?
Between tv episodes of raw and smackdown, several days throughout the week wwe would hold "house shows" these shows are not televised and there aren't any interviews, or backstage segments just matches and the occasional promo to work the crowd. House shows are one of wwes biggest sources of income by having shows about 5 days a week. And three of those shows save a lot of money since theres no need for production quality. House shows are not canon to wwe, as they are never mentioned on the tv episodes, despite the fact two wrestlers feuding wrestled almost every single day that week theyll act like they haven't seen each since the last tv episode. Since storylines dont matter in house shows, theyll do whats called the dusty finish where the face will almost always beat the heel to have a satisfying ending for the crowd. Almost everyone on this list were heels.
@@calebpresley8743 ahh gotcha. That crossed my mind but didnt seem right considering when we speak on matches usually, its the ones shown. But if these that aren't dont matter, begs the question.. who cares? Lol
Crash was awesome. R.I.P He was a great technical wrestler and not many people realize that. Dare I say he's one of the best technicoans. And to be fair I'm sure half of those losses were Hardcore 24/7 matches since he was one of the 2 kings of the Hardcore Division along with his cousin Hardcore Holly.
2009 Orton specifically surprised me because 09 'bald' Orton is considered one of the most notable heels of all time yet lost that much shows how impactful his appearances were.
I don't get how they can lose so many matches...like even if they fight every week (almost 52 times) + PPVs (let's say 25)... they won't be fighting that many matches in a single year , forget about losing
where'd u get the stats for this? 365 days in a year ... 120 + losses... 1 every 3 days. aside from raw and smackdown and the random PPV, what else is there - 4 house events a week? sources please
a lot of these guys were heels, so they're going to have lots of DQs for breaking the rules (which leads to no disqualification matches). 2nd, the heel gotta loose.
Obviously for every winner there has to be a loser. In this list there the majority are mid to upper card stars, who've all had big pushes and won belts.
Thats really interesting. it seems like as time marches on you see fewer jobbers losing the most matches and more main eventers losing the most matches. Still I'd sat its a crap shoot. if you lose 130 matches it could be because your just grinding out a paycheck as enhancement talent, or it could be that your about to be one of the most prolific wrestlers of your time.
My question is how is this possible Because if you think about it , there's only two shows per week fifty two weeks in a year , so they must be counting house shows
Can someone explain me this We have 52 weeks in a year that means 52 raws and 52 SmackDown and we have max to max 10 ppvs in a year so that means total of 114 events even if Randy Orton or any other superstar fought on every event how is this possible that he lost 128 matches ?
What are you saying man🤦😱😂 There are 52 episodes smackdown and raw each and 12 PPVS WHICH MEANS a wrestlers maximum have 64 matches a year you know it is not possible for anyone to compete in all So assuming the half wrestlers could have 32 matches then how you can say 😂😂😂😂😂
basically the biggest heel of each year
Randy wasn’t a heel and miz wasn’t even that over as a heel, it was a mistake to give him the Wwe title when the locker room didn’t even respect him.
I hate how wwe buries the heels
It wasn't really the biggest heels at all A couple of times it was but not every time
@@iv_valentinee Two heels longest reigns in history.
@@purpleperc1012locker room bullied Miz until Undertaker himself stepped up for miz
Edge, The Rock, Randy Orton and Ziggler surprised me seriously when they announced the losses they had
Angle in 02 is wild too .
@@deouzjh99lmaoo fkn angle 😂 early 2000s angle was a laugh
The Rock never went over in a WM main event for the belt too on top of that says a lot about the WWE in general.
DEFINITELY HOUSE SHOWS
Heels
Randy Orton was the most shocking to me. 128!? WHAT!!?? He was the top star
And that was his best year
@@bringbackskylanders1639 yess!!! Exactly
He was a heel
@@P2_grim2 yeahhhh
Probably by disqualification 🤷🏽♂️
Remember, most of these matches aren't on air. Didn't do anything with the main storyline
I cant believe top stars and future top stars lost a lot of matches.
well, a lot of matches happen on house shows and never air.
When WWE is on tour they repeat the same matches and results over and over again, often with the simple finish of 'heel loses, happy crowd' or multi man tag matches.
So it doesn't really indicate WWE burying a star or not having faith in them. It just shows that they are using someone very consistently in their programing which is a very good thing for a wrestlers career ...
Yes, it surprised me especially the number of matches they wrestled. Some looked like they lost a match every 3 days
So the trend from the 1990s....the more matches you lost likely meant the bigger the push😂. Alot of these losses came off screen especially house shows where they mostly book to send the fans home happy especially where heels were concerned. And probably look it up , many of the losses came from DQs, Count outs, some pins. Many times over the year you look up any rival losing to another every single night in a different city. Example in 1994 into 1995 Owen Hart got beat by his brother over 100 times in that span. Yet Owen still ascends as King of the Ring in 1995. Riding off one huge win over Bret in the opening match of Wrestlemania X where Brett still became champ that night.
I had no idea they were having this many matches a year
Most of these losses are off camera house shows they do them every day it seems.
It made sense for The Rock despite being Heel he was still scratching the surface as part of NoD but after losing the IC Title he got his stepping stone to Main Event status & World Title picture
Surprisingly that Bray Wyatt didn't make the list with how he used to get booked. However list shows it's always about how you finish not how you start
Seth with 160 🤯
Nice video
Im surprised by Crash Holly and Owen Hart
My Favorites including other wrestlers that i like so much
2009 was his best year too
Surprised Kane isn’t there ngl
The Rock is the goat of wrestling. He got booked like crap and still was a star and lost 4 straight wrestlemania from 98-01.
Banger of a vid
Love It WrestlelamiaShorts Guys.
It doesn't seem to crazy to say the people with high loses tend to be popular. I mean Curt Hawkins had a loss streak and that gained him the most polularity he had in WWE.
It's funny how many of these loss record holders are/were World Champions and/or HoF members/legends, yet fanboys still get their knickers in a bunch at Road Dogg saying that wins and losses don't matter.
They lost in house shows that aren't telecasted and are irrelevant. Win/loss in the weekly shows do matter.
Yeah they do. Stone cold went home based on losing one match. Hogan never was seen losing on tv in 80s neither roddy. Ask yourself how many times you say cena lose as world champion in his heyday.
Are you like 80?
This had to count in person non televised events
Surely swagger, miz, edge and Orton didnt had to lose soo much if it werent for live events losing clean to cena amirite?
Randy was booked against Triple H, Batista and Cena for 8 out of the 12 months in 2009. They were Vince’s guys, so he booked Randy to look weak against them, even though he and CM Punk were the two hottest guys in the company at the time.
@@markrobinson9394 It was because randy was a heel with a stable, you cannot do that and look too strong.
@@dxfifa Roman Reigns with the Bloodline, Triple H with the McMahon-Helmsley Era and Evolution, Hollywood Hogan with the nWo, Bret Hart with the Hart Foundation, Shawn Michaels with DX, etc.
Examples of wrestlers who were leading a heel stable and almost never lost. Yet for some reason, they had Randy frequently lose on PPV, TV and house shows in 2009, despite being arguably the top star and having Rhodes and DiBiase to back him up. Legacy were treated as an absolute joke. They never even won the Tag Titles while they were a stable.
The early years don't really count because of disqualifications and count outs. That's why Ric Flair had so many "losses."
This has to be including live shows not just the TV shows because the amount of losses are more than the number of episodes, right?
That's what I figured
Some of these are hard to believe
A British guy trying to say " wrestlin' " gets me every time 😅
Shelton Benjamin's shocked me the least, because I remember how they booked him as the guy to help push the real person they're trying to push. Also he was pushed as a heel.
These aren’t *THAT* shocking to me really… though it’s funny that WL kept dropping “staggering/stunning/etc” for loss counts in the 120’s but opted to just say “163 in total” for Tyler Breeze and merely “a ton of losses with 160” for Seth
A good way to build a sniveling heel is to give them a bunch of losses and have them complain about it, but you also have heels get their comeuppance on a regular basis if you’re trying to build up a face that’s been put through the ringer
Likewise a face can be handed relentless defeats and given an underdog manner of handling it to garner sympathy or relatability as they then face opposition from heels as they eventually build momentum
I’m stunned that Curt Hawkins losing streak only made the list once with 128 losses, but I guess he was a good example of longterm booking since it took a few years to hit his still standing record of 269 consecutive losses
There was also a TON of 50/50 booking through a lot of these years, so that adds up when you’re on TV constantly
How many matches do they do per year !?
Every day. They wrestle Every day, which is risky and abused sometimes.
bruh, some of these are unbelievable
Many people listed here shocked me but none shocked me as much as Seth with 160
Baron corbin 2018 with 127 loss was still the last guy to pin roman reigns in over 4 years. Before jey i mean
So whats this mean? They lost that many matches? I mean not everyone wrestles all the time. Youre telling me like the rock.. 115, that means he was on tv and recorded these matches and 115 were losses? In 365 days he lost once ever 3 days?? 3 days?? They wrestle like once a week or twice i believe. What am i missing?
Between tv episodes of raw and smackdown, several days throughout the week wwe would hold "house shows" these shows are not televised and there aren't any interviews, or backstage segments just matches and the occasional promo to work the crowd. House shows are one of wwes biggest sources of income by having shows about 5 days a week. And three of those shows save a lot of money since theres no need for production quality. House shows are not canon to wwe, as they are never mentioned on the tv episodes, despite the fact two wrestlers feuding wrestled almost every single day that week theyll act like they haven't seen each since the last tv episode. Since storylines dont matter in house shows, theyll do whats called the dusty finish where the face will almost always beat the heel to have a satisfying ending for the crowd. Almost everyone on this list were heels.
@@calebpresley8743 ahh gotcha. That crossed my mind but didnt seem right considering when we speak on matches usually, its the ones shown. But if these that aren't dont matter, begs the question.. who cares? Lol
Dam, surprised Shinske not on here. Homeboy is down bad
Crash was awesome. R.I.P
He was a great technical wrestler and not many people realize that. Dare I say he's one of the best technicoans.
Crash was awesome. R.I.P
He was a great technical wrestler and not many people realize that. Dare I say he's one of the best technicoans. And to be fair I'm sure half of those losses were Hardcore 24/7 matches since he was one of the 2 kings of the Hardcore Division along with his cousin Hardcore Holly.
Do these include house shows?
Flair being at the biggest loser in 1992 is insane
2009 Orton specifically surprised me because 09 'bald' Orton is considered one of the most notable heels of all time yet lost that much shows how impactful his appearances were.
I'm surprised when Seth Rollins " the shield member" got 163 losses sense he's one of the top guys
At least Undertaker wasn't made a Jobber in any of those years.
I'm more surpised that these guys have that many matches a year. I figured they just wrestled once or twice a week
How do you keep track of these?!?
Look at Skinner and Duke The Dumpster Droese on how much losses they had .
Iron mike sharp has to be on this list somewhere
In 2023 Kaiser lost the most matches, in 2024 he’s dating Tiffany. Quite the comeback.
Miz,kurt angle,jack swagger,randy,edge 😂😂😂
Well done to whoever was tasked with researching all these stats.
I don't get how they can lose so many matches...like even if they fight every week (almost 52 times) + PPVs (let's say 25)... they won't be fighting that many matches in a single year , forget about losing
House shows do count
@@Entertainer12314 oh , thanks... Been a fan from a long time but I wasn't aware of the house shows thing
@sum2763 and don't forget some wrestlers fight twice at the Royal Rumble and can lose both times
where'd u get the stats for this? 365 days in a year ... 120 + losses... 1 every 3 days. aside from raw and smackdown and the random PPV, what else is there - 4 house events a week? sources please
We gotta remember some of these matches end in DQ's
HHH hits somebody with a sledgehammer then he loses but keeps his title type shit.
How about most wins each year?
a lot of these guys were heels, so they're going to have lots of DQs for breaking the rules (which leads to no disqualification matches). 2nd, the heel gotta loose.
Obviously for every winner there has to be a loser. In this list there the majority are mid to upper card stars, who've all had big pushes and won belts.
ps.Nice video @WrestlelamiaShorts
Thats really interesting. it seems like as time marches on you see fewer jobbers losing the most matches and more main eventers losing the most matches. Still I'd sat its a crap shoot. if you lose 130 matches it could be because your just grinding out a paycheck as enhancement talent, or it could be that your about to be one of the most prolific wrestlers of your time.
Roman and undertaker and brock having high win %
This includes House Shows right? Can't imagine it was all on TV.
Were a lot of these house show matches?
yes
How many house shows are there💀 cuz 160 for rollins is crazy
Man angle and randy was shocking
So somehow, Al Snow wasn't the biggest jobber of any year? I think Mick owes someone an apology...
There are only 52 weeks in a year so how the heck are they losing 100+ matches?
I wonder how many of them where Dq...Great heel move but they lose the match
Dominik mysterio
champions and champions sidekicks will lose more cause they have more matches than others and vince loved 50-50, no surprise with any of them
I'm surprised Cesaro was only on the list once 😂
Curt Hawkins greatest jobber of all time
Before watching the video I’m going to guess between 1985 - 1990 it will be anyone having a run with Hogan
Live show losses never mattered.
How can someone lose over a 100 times in a single year? Aren't they assigned to either Raw or Smackdown and usually wrestles once a week?
It means jobbers and biggest heal loses most except some
How many matches they do a year? That is a lot of wear and tear on the body
Who is Moondog Spot? He's the only name I have no clue who he is
160 seth😢
How did you manage to compile this? #wrestlelamiashorts
Shoulda included there wins
Actually Owen's lossws didn't matter because he was a 2 time Slammy Award winning Superstar 😂
Cesaro was misused by the WWE
I'm really confused. If raw is only showed one time a week and there's 52 weeks in a year then how do these wrestlers have over 100 losses
You lose either if you are into following year's push for creating sympathy for baby face character development or you are a jobber
I stopped watching wrestling in 2010
I honestly thought the Miz had the most losses last year
My question is how is this possible Because if you think about it , there's only two shows per week fifty two weeks in a year , so they must be counting house shows
2024 jd mcdonah
Can someone explain me this
We have 52 weeks in a year that means 52 raws and 52 SmackDown and we have max to max 10 ppvs in a year so that means total of 114 events even if Randy Orton or any other superstar fought on every event how is this possible that he lost 128 matches ?
Whrasling is so silly.
No Brock or stone cold I'm shock
Batista or edge who is better?? Who has a better legacy.
?
How do they lose that many matches when they only wrestle once a week? Even I clouding ppvs that's not even 70 loses surely
It counts house shows and dark matches.
Rock lose not a surprise because at that time, he was face DX and McMahon fiction.
Does anyone think that the majority of the losses from heel champions were by disqualification?
What are you saying man🤦😱😂
There are 52 episodes smackdown and raw each and 12 PPVS
WHICH MEANS a wrestlers maximum have 64 matches a year you know it is not possible for anyone to compete in all
So assuming the half wrestlers could have 32 matches then how you can say 😂😂😂😂😂
Are these house shows too?
I think so considering some mid carders had triple number losses
Brooklyn brawler?
Unless these are WWE-fabricated statistics, I'm guessing these include house shows. No way they wrestle that much otherwise.
This just shows outside of the top baby faces losses don’t mean anything.
Source :- Trust me Bro
They didn’t even wrestle that much? This had to have included house shows..
Do one with least matches had by a wrestler. Roman in 2023 appeared like 3 times haha😂
Irs is Bray Wyatts daddy