Hey everyone, thanks so much for your support! I also want to say thank you to Skillshare for sponsoring this video - the first 1000 people to use this link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: skl.sh/parthg04211
Masterful explanation Parth! Great introduction to some of the math that leads to the Pauli exclusion principle. I think viewers of my recent video on superconductivity will find this video super helpful. Perfect blending of math and intuition.
There’s a saying that goes, “if you can’t explain it simply, you simply do not understand it enough.” Or something like that. This man here; Understands more than enough. Awesome video!
A priest, a Higgs boson and a neutrino walk into a bar. The bartender asks “what you guys do for a living?” The Priest and the Higgs say ”I give mass.” The neutrino says “That’s not my field.”
@@erdemmemisyazici3950 maybe. I'm more interested in whether Majorana or Dirac was right. I lean toward Majorana simply because he had a cooler sounding name.
@@erdemmemisyazici3950 but it isn't the higgs mechanism that gives them mass (at least not the most simple one used for charged fermions), so the joke still works.
@@tanvirfarhan5585 If someone is a Bengali, it doesn't make him/her a Bangladeshi.Bose was a teacher in Dhaka university, but that was before the formation of Pakistan and Bangladesh, at that time India was united, there was no Pakistan or Bangladesh. Bose wasn't even born in Bangladesh, so no way he could be a Bangladeshi.
8:52, actually, this degeneration in energy disappears when including spin. technically, the electrons occupy two *slightly* different energy level, because of orientation of the elctrons with respect to the magnetic field induced by the "spining" charge (fine structure splitting). this conserves our intuitions about fermions again, because each fermionic state is going to be different energetically. there is always one quantum number used to desribe the system that is different for all fermions, and this will always lead to an energy difference.
Sir you explanation is really outstanding.... plz.... Make a video on why the frequency of light is constant while passing through any medium..... I cant find...any answer and i am tired of finding... I cant understand other videos on youtube.. Plz.... Help me.... Thanks... For reading the comment... 😣☺
It's hard and not as straight forward as for massive particles. Since there is no conservation rule for photons, they just get absorbed by whatever they are in contact which. But it has been done in a non-standard way. Google it.
Excellent video. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video. In this video, Parth made reference to his music videos and stated they're linked below. The linked path to said videos is a bit tricky. Click on the Parth UA-cam site, then scroll down to Parth's Shenanigans and click. You'll then find a plurality of short music videos. Parth generally is playing tabla and an 8-string guitar and an electrified string instrument from India (North India, as I recall from previous encounters with this instrument). His skill is quite good and the videos are worthwhile. I've known many tabla players and they tell me it takes many years to be proficient at tabla. Parth is beyond proficiency at tabla.
Thank You very much! This is the best video on BEC I have seen yet. No fancy general blah blah blah, but talk and graphics right into the core concepts. I subscribed Your channel.
Quantum Mechanics would be the next revolutionary knowledge we need to further advance our civilization. The discovery and understanding of atom made a significant change to how we are living and for sure if we manage to fully understand the magics of quarks, we could solve a shit ton amount of problems.
was checking out how superfluids behave and if you needed a visual to get a feel for what this "same energy, all atoms" business means you should too. really helps develop the intuition.
One of the big questions in cosmology today (as I understand, it because I'm neither a mathematician nor a scientist) is, "The universe is at a somewhat low level of entropy today. So, by the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, the early universe should have extremely low entropy. How is that possible?" My understanding is that the entropy of a Bose-Einstein condensate is zero. Perhaps the universe began, not as an extremely hot, dense state, but as a cold Bose-Einstein state reminiscent of LeMaitre's cosmic egg. This can probably work and would explain the entropy conundrum, but it would require a re-examination of some or our basic assumptions including the nature of dimensions themselves.
I don't know if this might help you, but I'm here to learn something about Bose Einstein Condensate after asking a question about cosmic background radiation and receiving a reply from her, she's a scientist. Here's what she said: This is not out of my wheelhouse at all, in fact, I have been thinking about this a lot lately. Here is my line of thinking. The CMB doesn't come from the big bang. At least, not from the standard model thinking of the big bang. It is my opinion that the universe began at the opposite end of the thermodynamic spectrum at absolute zero. At this temperature, the whole universe is a superfluid and/or Bose Einstein Condensate. As the universe spins up (for whatever reason yet to be determined) quantum vortices are formed in the universal BEC. As more vortices are formed, the temperature of the universe increases. When the universe reaches a certain temperature, approximately 2.7 degrees K, there is a phase transition which is what we perceive as the big bang where all the charged particles (electrons and protons etc) are formed. That is why we have a CMB. That is the temperature of the universe at the moment of the Big Phase Transition which we perceive as the big bang. This idea has precedence in actual BEC experiments which experience similar phase transitions at similar temperatures. The background vortices that form in the BEC make still exist. This is the medium for the propagation of light. This is difficult to explain in one comment, but hopefully I did it justice. EDIT: Her youtube channel is called FractalWoman if you're interested to find out any of the teachings in her videos. She's rather amazing.
@@areyouavinalaff An interesting idea. My thoughts are that matter slowly accumulated as matter/antimatter pairs rather than all at once in a Big Bang. Also, that dimensions are "emergent", coming into being only as needed. So, you would have a one, then two, then three dimensional universe. (This is no more odd than String Theory's 11 dimensions). As a dimensions reaches some critical point, a further dimension emerges. So, why would the matter/antimatter pairs not annihilate in a burst of energy? Because, there is not yet a time dimension. In physics, as I understand it, these pairs are treated as if they were identical particles but traveling in opposite time dimensions. When the 4th dimension, time , emerges the pairs are separated and that degree of difference in the time dimension gives the pair the potential energy that we see in annihilation. But in a timeless 3d only state, it would require no energy (no "borrowing from the vacuum" to create the pairs, They could simply exist or not. And since temperature is a function of motion and TIME, there really is no temperature in our current sense of the word. We would have an absolutely cold state that could have the properties of a Bose-Einstein condensate. A nice extension of this is that when the time dimension emerges, the matter is already spread over the existing 3 dimensions. If you make the assumption that everything started from a point as in the Big Bang, it would appear that the universe "expanded" to a certain size instantly. You don't need Inflation Theory to explain away the problems of the original Big Bang theory. Fun to speculate about it. 😁
@@areyouavinalaff Thanks for the edit. I watched one of her videos last night. She has some unique and very interesting viewpoints. I like it that she is willing to say when she's expressing an opinion.
When we solve |phi_{A,B}|=|phi_{B,A}|, we get any phase shift like phi_{A,B}=e^{i x} phi_{B,A}. When we look at x=0 or x=pi I guess this defines bosons and fermions but what about the rest ?
I was eagerly waiting for this concept becaise i was strange to this when my brother in 9th grade ask me about it i was quiet well thanks for this brother
I am puzzled of how bosons preserve quantum information. I get that fermions do that given that this class of particles are not allowed to have the same quantum numbers, hence occupy the same state at the same time, am I getting this right? Bosons and fermions should both preserve quantum information, isn't it? Path if kind enough, maybe to explain how that is happening in the context of QM, or let me know in a short message (it's been troubling me for some time, I'm just lacking the understanding in connecting these). Kudos for all your material, big fan from your first video I’ve seen ;)
Hi. maybe this at-absolute-0-matter-behaviour is a noticeable to macroscopic scale proof of wave matter? - When all matter is at absolute 0 , then there is no entropy at all, and only synchronized quantum field excitation left, all particles, or rather matter waves , are now synchronised, creating one big macro-scaled quantum system, that`s my understanding of B-E C effect.....
Teacher: There are 3 states of matter The nerdy over smart kid: Actually there are 4 states The quiet kid who knows Bose-Einsteins Condensate: P A T H E T I C
Sir i have a confusion that if identical particles means tha every property like mass ,charge، spin etc are same ...than how we can say that fermions are identical as fermions have two opposite spins +1/2, -1/2....if fermions have opposite spin then why we call fermions are identical and indistinguishable?????? it's confusing me a lot....😩😩
But I still have a doubt. Is it flowing like fluids or does it stay in it's place like solids? If it is neither solid nor fluid then doesn't that mean it'll neither flow nor stay in it's place ?
How to convert fermion to bosone? Did gravity can change this rules and force fermions to be in one energy level that mean transform it to bosen or pseudo-bosone or bosone-fermion and uniform it with other bosone convert it to some new partiical that can exist only in black hole because only there is so much gravity force larger than every forces even stronge force.
I'm kinda new to quantum mechanics so I don't have great basis on mathematics behind it. I understood the concept of bra and ket and the fact that vectorial spaces are used instead of normal sets. I have 2 related questions: 1) what kind of mathematical relationship is |0>|0>? I know about inner product between bra and ket but it would be . 2) why the wave function is given by the relationship of question 1? (Talking about the very first example, at 5:42). If more mathematical concepts are needed to understand this, could you please give me some resources? Thank you so much for the content and for the help!
Hey im not path and if i am beeing honest im not even a physicist... However i am defenetly a 14 year old physics nerd and im currently teaching myself University maths and physics. You say that you are not good at chraming. If you mean memorizing then dont worry, no matter how hard you will try you wont get far in physics if you just memorize stuff. If you mean just having the paicients to sit and look at equations for many hours straight and still trying to understand them then i know what you mean... Sadly, there is no solution to this. Its goddam hard but you will need to learn it. And here is s important tip: Also be paicient with the exercises!!! My biggest problem is that i emydeatly give up when i cant solve a problem in a book and just look for the answers. However, Problems in higher mathmatics and physics are built this way. Shool is like: You learn how to add two numbers therfore your homework is adding numbers. University is like: You learnd how to differentiate therefore we dont give you problems were you just differentiate because you already now that but instead we let you, for ecsample, proof a theorem by using differntiation. Thats why such problems sometimes take hours. You are not used to finding the answer to a problem after an hour. In Shool you ether find it imediatly or not/at all(at least most times). So if you are new to higher physics and mathematics dont get this bad habbit. I hope this helped. Ps. Sorry for the bad english. Its my second language.
@@erikawimmer7908 Im 17 and i have also filled my brain with the basic stuffs of the universe and i want to dig deeper but cramming syllabus is the thing in which I'm no good.
@@adtex02 Yeah as I saied there is no way arrond sorry... You just need to cram those physics books. But it will get easyer whith time trust me! Also: Two things are important. 1. Learn the math! I dont know if you also like math like me but it doesnt really matter. You need to learn much higher maths before you can really learn physics. 2. You say that you filled your brain with the basic stuff. Thats actually not as good as it might seem. If you learn university physics you will see that you will revisit everything important that you learnd in shool just in a mathematicaly much more rigourus way. So dont spend your time rewising shools stuff! Instead get started on the math emiedeatly get started on the math! And use textbooks. Yes You Tube is a good sorce and there are many good resorces on the Internet if you dont have the money to buy a fifty bucks textbook for every topic but if you can then do it. And do as much and as hard exercises as you can!
the video was superb, but i have a question. in the formula of critical temperature, you mentioned mass of bosons.But bosons are massless , as photons are one of them. how can we account their mass?
I assume by using their relativistic mass from E=mc² (their Energy can be seen as a virtual mass). In general, the definition of "temperature" for photons is tricky, so we define it as the average energy of each photon (similar to the average kinematic energy of each molecule)
Wait a minute. I thought the whole idea of the BEC was that genuine took on a bosonic state and acted a a single entity (of course I'm just regurgitating what I thought I understood from a few other UA-cam videos).
I was led to beleave that matter can form bose-einstein condensate. But matter is formed from other things not (only) bosones. Im confused, can someone clarify?
I have learn bose Einstein distribution and i have a confusion Firstly i read that partials in same cells have equal energies then i read about subcells in a cell so tell me plzzz does particals have different energies if they are in same cell but different subcells
And this confusion firstly came when i study bore model according to bore energies are same for same cell but then my teacher said lower energy subcell must be filled first but how can a subcells of same cells have diff. Energies
Bose-Einstein condensate makes elements act as if they were bigger, making it easier for scientists to observe ... What? Superfluidity? What else? How big can you make this? Can we see it with light? Can we see with the naked eye?
So far Quantum physics is the most confusing subject for me since I have been introduced to it....I can remembere all the fact about it....but whenever I think why does scientists assume perticular particle(electron).... In state of superposition.... whenever i search about it everyone explains shrodingers cat expriment ...but I cant relate it to electron....Would you please explain it?
Hello, Thanks for your video, somebody asked me: "can bose-einstein condensate as 5th state of matter change into fermionic state? Like in melting ice that solid changes into liquid " , I'd really appreciate if you could answer it.
I have one question sir , when we talk about hydrogen spectrum we usually talk about balmer lines. That is electrons jumps from higher energy level to 2 nd energy level giving out H alpha to delta lines. Hydrogen have 1 electron . Most probably it should be in ground state. So why we get hydrogen spectrum from higher energy levels to 2 nd energy level??
Light is a kind of a transverse wave with a frequency, when it hits matter , matter gets disturbed at the same frequency, matter will disturb neighborhood matter in the same frequency, Matter should emit its own energy at a lower energy. Or frequency
Off topic but if at the edge of an event horizon the gravitational field strength is c^2 does that mean the relativistic circumference of a black hole is infinite?
Hey everyone, thanks so much for your support! I also want to say thank you to Skillshare for sponsoring this video - the first 1000 people to use this link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: skl.sh/parthg04211
Hello! I love your explanation. Could you please make a video on Young’s Modulus too ?I will be ever so grateful!🤍 Thank you 🤓
But i dont understand what is so special in - all particles being in the same state (energy state)?
SN Bose was probably major figure in science who is very much underrated and goes unappreciated.
Yup…:)
Trueeeeeeeeee
So glad his name was given to the class of particles. Hopefully, that will help future generations remove the blinders.
Exactly
@@matthewhoag2609 👍
Masterful explanation Parth! Great introduction to some of the math that leads to the Pauli exclusion principle. I think viewers of my recent video on superconductivity will find this video super helpful. Perfect blending of math and intuition.
Wow u are here!
Thanks so much Arvin! :D
how we know that mass and charge of an electron is always constant to another electron? Plz answer
I just came here after watching your video about superconductivity 😂✌🏻
no one
literally no one
parth and arvin commenting on each others videos
There’s a saying that goes, “if you can’t explain it simply, you simply do not understand it enough.” Or something like that.
This man here; Understands more than enough. Awesome video!
A priest, a Higgs boson and a neutrino walk into a bar. The bartender asks “what you guys do for a living?” The Priest and the Higgs say ”I give mass.” The neutrino says “That’s not my field.”
Neutrinos do have some mass though.
@@erdemmemisyazici3950 maybe. I'm more interested in whether Majorana or Dirac was right. I lean toward Majorana simply because he had a cooler sounding name.
AHAHAHA
@@erdemmemisyazici3950 but it isn't the higgs mechanism that gives them mass (at least not the most simple one used for charged fermions), so the joke still works.
Wow that was so funny
Watching from Bangladesh and Proud of Bose
He was an Indian.
Proud of Bose but not for nationalistic reasons
And Einstein was a GOD
@@arihantvyas6271 he was also a Bangladeshi. A Bengali . he was the teacher of Dhaka University .
Milo Murphy's Law is the best show. Star vs is a poopy show
@@tanvirfarhan5585 If someone is a Bengali, it doesn't make him/her a Bangladeshi.Bose was a teacher in Dhaka university, but that was before the formation of Pakistan and Bangladesh, at that time India was united, there was no Pakistan or Bangladesh. Bose wasn't even born in Bangladesh, so no way he could be a Bangladeshi.
The best illustrated explanation that I needed for quite some time now.
Funnily enough this helped me greatly in getting a better intuition for the Pauli exclusion principle. Thanks a lot!!
I have physics exam soon, this vedio really helped me , Thanks
Hi Parth...
Please do a video about the Casimir force.
Bro I am in 8th and understood most of it. Keep it up.....ur an awesome teacher :)
8:52, actually, this degeneration in energy disappears when including spin. technically, the electrons occupy two *slightly* different energy level, because of orientation of the elctrons with respect to the magnetic field induced by the "spining" charge (fine structure splitting). this conserves our intuitions about fermions again, because each fermionic state is going to be different energetically. there is always one quantum number used to desribe the system that is different for all fermions, and this will always lead to an energy difference.
How have I never seen this channel before???!!? Lord you've got so many lists explaining very hard concepts easily... Thank you for all of this
I'm gonna be doing my master's dissertation on BECs so I definitely will be binging your videos along with others. Thanks :)
Wow 100k, congratulations
To 1M and beyond
proud of bose love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
Parth congrats with 100000 subs, and video I guess is an application of Arvin Ash’s video of superconductivity 🙃
Thank you! you've helped alot in my graduate Stat Mech course...but these integrals (Fermi-Dirac & Bose-Einstein) are killing me
I am amazed by the explanation.
This video leads to open new horizon in my understanding on Bose-Einstein Condensation.
Thanks for the sharing.
Took a minute to get here but, worth the trip. Thanks Parth!
Sir you explanation is really outstanding.... plz.... Make a video on why the frequency of light is constant while passing through any medium..... I cant find...any answer and i am tired of finding... I cant understand other videos on youtube.. Plz.... Help me.... Thanks... For reading the comment... 😣☺
Just a silly doubt. ;p As photons are also bosons is it possible to cool down and trap a bunch of photons and making them a Bose-Einstein condensate?
It's hard and not as straight forward as for massive particles. Since there is no conservation rule for photons, they just get absorbed by whatever they are in contact which. But it has been done in a non-standard way. Google it.
Expriments were done where at near absolute zero and in a vacuum where light was slowed to just 38kph.
Excellent video. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video.
In this video, Parth made reference to his music videos and stated they're linked below. The linked path to said videos is a bit tricky. Click on the Parth UA-cam site, then scroll down to Parth's Shenanigans and click. You'll then find a plurality of short music videos. Parth generally is playing tabla and an 8-string guitar and an electrified string instrument from India (North India, as I recall from previous encounters with this instrument). His skill is quite good and the videos are worthwhile. I've known many tabla players and they tell me it takes many years to be proficient at tabla. Parth is beyond proficiency at tabla.
Thank You very much! This is the best video on BEC I have seen yet. No fancy general blah blah blah, but talk and graphics right into the core concepts. I subscribed Your channel.
Just recently discovered your channel and I must say it is amazing. Thank you for providing such great quality content!
Quantum Mechanics would be the next revolutionary knowledge we need to further advance our civilization. The discovery and understanding of atom made a significant change to how we are living and for sure if we manage to fully understand the magics of quarks, we could solve a shit ton amount of problems.
was checking out how superfluids behave and if you needed a visual to get a feel for what this "same energy, all atoms" business means you should too. really helps develop the intuition.
Amazing video dude. Keep it up.
One of the big questions in cosmology today (as I understand, it because I'm neither a mathematician nor a scientist) is, "The universe is at a somewhat low level of entropy today. So, by the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, the early universe should have extremely low entropy. How is that possible?" My understanding is that the entropy of a Bose-Einstein condensate is zero. Perhaps the universe began, not as an extremely hot, dense state, but as a cold Bose-Einstein state reminiscent of LeMaitre's cosmic egg. This can probably work and would explain the entropy conundrum, but it would require a re-examination of some or our basic assumptions including the nature of dimensions themselves.
I don't know if this might help you, but I'm here to learn something about Bose Einstein Condensate after asking a question about cosmic background radiation and receiving a reply from her, she's a scientist.
Here's what she said: This is not out of my wheelhouse at all, in fact, I have been thinking about this a lot lately. Here is my line of thinking. The CMB doesn't come from the big bang. At least, not from the standard model thinking of the big bang. It is my opinion that the universe began at the opposite end of the thermodynamic spectrum at absolute zero. At this temperature, the whole universe is a superfluid and/or Bose Einstein Condensate. As the universe spins up (for whatever reason yet to be determined) quantum vortices are formed in the universal BEC. As more vortices are formed, the temperature of the universe increases. When the universe reaches a certain temperature, approximately 2.7 degrees K, there is a phase transition which is what we perceive as the big bang where all the charged particles (electrons and protons etc) are formed. That is why we have a CMB. That is the temperature of the universe at the moment of the Big Phase Transition which we perceive as the big bang. This idea has precedence in actual BEC experiments which experience similar phase transitions at similar temperatures. The background vortices that form in the BEC make still exist. This is the medium for the propagation of light. This is difficult to explain in one comment, but hopefully I did it justice. EDIT: Her youtube channel is called FractalWoman if you're interested to find out any of the teachings in her videos. She's rather amazing.
@@areyouavinalaff An interesting idea. My thoughts are that matter slowly accumulated as matter/antimatter pairs rather than all at once in a Big Bang. Also, that dimensions are "emergent", coming into being only as needed. So, you would have a one, then two, then three dimensional universe. (This is no more odd than String Theory's 11 dimensions). As a dimensions reaches some critical point, a further dimension emerges. So, why would the matter/antimatter pairs not annihilate in a burst of energy? Because, there is not yet a time dimension. In physics, as I understand it, these pairs are treated as if they were identical particles but traveling in opposite time dimensions. When the 4th dimension, time , emerges the pairs are separated and that degree of difference in the time dimension gives the pair the potential energy that we see in annihilation. But in a timeless 3d only state, it would require no energy (no "borrowing from the vacuum" to create the pairs, They could simply exist or not. And since temperature is a function of motion and TIME, there really is no temperature in our current sense of the word. We would have an absolutely cold state that could have the properties of a Bose-Einstein condensate. A nice extension of this is that when the time dimension emerges, the matter is already spread over the existing 3 dimensions. If you make the assumption that everything started from a point as in the Big Bang, it would appear that the universe "expanded" to a certain size instantly. You don't need Inflation Theory to explain away the problems of the original Big Bang theory. Fun to speculate about it. 😁
@@areyouavinalaff Thanks for the edit. I watched one of her videos last night. She has some unique and very interesting viewpoints. I like it that she is willing to say when she's expressing an opinion.
I have probably never subscribed for someone so quickly.
8:27 blew my mind, so cool!
Just tapped to search for the video and got the notification
Finally a video I've been waiting for months😀😀🔥🔥
Kindly make a video on fermions and state how fermions are identical if fermions have opposite spin??
Man, it's 2:30 in the morning. Why am I watching this..?
But you have new subscriber.
When we solve |phi_{A,B}|=|phi_{B,A}|, we get any phase shift like phi_{A,B}=e^{i x} phi_{B,A}. When we look at x=0 or x=pi I guess this defines bosons and fermions but what about the rest ?
Thanks Parth, for Including name in Your Video: Satyendra Nath Bose.👏🏽
Definitely enjoyed this video - excellent theoretical and application of BEC descriptions.
Thank you so much
Amazing 👌
Very mastered explanation ,thanks ,keep going for more videos
Loved it your explanation is so good!! Gonna watch all your videos. Really really helpful🤩👍
very clear explanation, thank you.
Thank you🌹🌹🌹.
Congratulations for 100k subscribers
Thanks Parth, you are great man.
Excellent video Parth! Love your channel
Exceptional video, as always
I was eagerly waiting for this concept becaise i was strange to this when my brother in 9th grade ask me about it i was quiet well thanks for this brother
excellent
You're a legend bro!!! Thank you
Excellent explanation!
Hello!I love your explanation. Could you please make a video on Young’s Modulus ?I will be ever so grateful!🤍
I am puzzled of how bosons preserve quantum information. I get that fermions do that given that this class of particles are not allowed to have the same quantum numbers, hence occupy the same state at the same time, am I getting this right?
Bosons and fermions should both preserve quantum information, isn't it?
Path if kind enough, maybe to explain how that is happening in the context of QM, or let me know in a short message (it's been troubling me for some time, I'm just lacking the understanding in connecting these).
Kudos for all your material, big fan from your first video I’ve seen ;)
Hi.
maybe this at-absolute-0-matter-behaviour is a noticeable to macroscopic scale proof of wave matter?
- When all matter is at absolute 0 , then there is no entropy at all, and only synchronized quantum field excitation left, all particles, or rather matter waves , are now synchronised, creating one big macro-scaled quantum system, that`s my understanding of B-E C effect.....
I understood nothing, but it was a good video.
Teacher: There are 3 states of matter
The nerdy over smart kid: Actually there are 4 states
The quiet kid who knows Bose-Einsteins Condensate:
P A T H E T I C
4th one is plasma and 5 th one is bose einstein condensate
Very good
I can't be the only one who saw the movie spectral and wanted to learn more
Sir i have a confusion that if identical particles means tha every property like mass ,charge، spin etc are same ...than how we can say that fermions are identical as fermions have two opposite spins +1/2, -1/2....if fermions have opposite spin then why we call fermions are identical and indistinguishable?????? it's confusing me a lot....😩😩
Very nice explanation.
Does cooling effect one manifestation of energy more than another? Is something like potential more susceptible than kinetic for example?
How can you be physicist and musician at the same time? Physics is maths and music is imagination.
But I still have a doubt. Is it flowing like fluids or does it stay in it's place like solids? If it is neither solid nor fluid then doesn't that mean it'll neither flow nor stay in it's place ?
Awesome
How to convert fermion to bosone? Did gravity can change this rules and force fermions to be in one energy level that mean transform it to bosen or pseudo-bosone or bosone-fermion and uniform it with other bosone convert it to some new partiical that can exist only in black hole because only there is so much gravity force larger than every forces even stronge force.
SN Bose deserves Bharath Ratna
I'm kinda new to quantum mechanics so I don't have great basis on mathematics behind it. I understood the concept of bra and ket and the fact that vectorial spaces are used instead of normal sets.
I have 2 related questions:
1) what kind of mathematical relationship is |0>|0>? I know about inner product between bra and ket but it would be .
2) why the wave function is given by the relationship of question 1? (Talking about the very first example, at 5:42).
If more mathematical concepts are needed to understand this, could you please give me some resources?
Thank you so much for the content and for the help!
I keep getting lost in thought while I listen to this.
Would it be possible for fermions condensate behind an event horizon
Please make a video on Lagrange hamilton mechanics virtual work etc..
Great
3:30 If I'm not mistaken bosons bunch up and fermions push away pairs.
Please do a video on internal symmetries and fundamental forces
what happens if we try to bring the fermions to the lowest energy level by cooling it?
Hey parth what can i do for my future in area of physics beacuase im not good at cramming..
Hey im not path and if i am beeing honest im not even a physicist...
However i am defenetly a 14 year old physics nerd and im currently teaching myself University maths and physics. You say that you are not good at chraming. If you mean memorizing then dont worry, no matter how hard you will try you wont get far in physics if you just memorize stuff.
If you mean just having the paicients to sit and look at equations for many hours straight and still trying to understand them then i know what you mean...
Sadly, there is no solution to this. Its goddam hard but you will need to learn it. And here is s important tip: Also be paicient with the exercises!!! My biggest problem is that i emydeatly give up when i cant solve a problem in a book and just look for the answers. However, Problems in higher mathmatics and physics are built this way.
Shool is like: You learn how to add two numbers therfore your homework is adding numbers.
University is like: You learnd how to differentiate therefore we dont give you problems were you just differentiate because you already now that but instead we let you, for ecsample, proof a theorem by using differntiation.
Thats why such problems sometimes take hours. You are not used to finding the answer to a problem after an hour. In Shool you ether find it imediatly or not/at all(at least most times). So if you are new to higher physics and mathematics dont get this bad habbit.
I hope this helped.
Ps. Sorry for the bad english. Its my second language.
@@erikawimmer7908 Im 17 and i have also filled my brain with the basic stuffs of the universe and i want to dig deeper but cramming syllabus is the thing in which I'm no good.
@@adtex02 Yeah as I saied there is no way arrond sorry... You just need to cram those physics books. But it will get easyer whith time trust me!
Also: Two things are important.
1. Learn the math! I dont know if you also like math like me but it doesnt really matter. You need to learn much higher maths before you can really learn physics.
2. You say that you filled your brain with the basic stuff. Thats actually not as good as it might seem. If you learn university physics you will see that you will revisit everything important that you learnd in shool just in a mathematicaly much more rigourus way. So dont spend your time rewising shools stuff! Instead get started on the math emiedeatly get started on the math!
And use textbooks. Yes You Tube is a good sorce and there are many good resorces on the Internet if you dont have the money to buy a fifty bucks textbook for every topic but if you can then do it. And do as much and as hard exercises as you can!
@@erikawimmer7908 Tnx for having this conversation . I see the world has a bright future 😄
@@adtex02 I am happy that i coud help!😀😀
Great video!
What kind of equipment is required to make these observations?
the video was superb, but i have a question. in the formula of critical temperature, you mentioned mass of bosons.But bosons are massless , as photons are one of them. how can we account their mass?
I assume by using their relativistic mass from E=mc² (their Energy can be seen as a virtual mass). In general, the definition of "temperature" for photons is tricky, so we define it as the average energy of each photon (similar to the average kinematic energy of each molecule)
Awesome man.
… yes. I agree.
Wait a minute. I thought the whole idea of the BEC was that genuine took on a bosonic state and acted a a single entity (of course I'm just regurgitating what I thought I understood from a few other UA-cam videos).
Does this mean that the pauli exclusion principle doesn’t apply to bosons
"I have one question: WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN MY WHOLE LIFE?!" - Your newest subscriber
I'm gonna name my business as BOSS EINSTEIN CONDENSATE Inc
Great video
I was led to beleave that matter can form bose-einstein condensate. But matter is formed from other things not (only) bosones. Im confused, can someone clarify?
Satyendra Nath Bose is like a super hero name lol.
Wow I’m nine and even I understand that well some of it don’t judge me I know what solids liquids and gas is and plasma
Why do Fermions have half spin?
I have learn bose Einstein distribution and i have a confusion
Firstly i read that partials in same cells have equal energies then i read about subcells in a cell so tell me plzzz does particals have different energies if they are in same cell but different subcells
And this confusion firstly came when i study bore model according to bore energies are same for same cell but then my teacher said lower energy subcell must be filled first but how can a subcells of same cells have diff. Energies
So ...what does a condensate of Photons look like?
Out of topic, what happens on a multiple potential well system? What can change, energy, wave function, energy spacing etc and why is this?
Bose-Einstein condensate makes elements act as if they were bigger, making it easier for scientists to observe ... What? Superfluidity? What else? How big can you make this? Can we see it with light? Can we see with the naked eye?
So far Quantum physics is the most confusing subject for me since I have been introduced to it....I can remembere all the fact about it....but whenever I think why does scientists assume perticular particle(electron).... In state of superposition.... whenever i search about it everyone explains shrodingers cat expriment ...but I cant relate it to electron....Would you please explain it?
Hello, Thanks for your video, somebody asked me: "can bose-einstein condensate as 5th state of matter change into fermionic state? Like in melting ice that solid changes into liquid " , I'd really appreciate if you could answer it.
Bosons have an even number of constituants and a Fermion has an odd number of
I have one question sir , when we talk about hydrogen spectrum we usually talk about balmer lines. That is electrons jumps from higher energy level to 2 nd energy level giving out H alpha to delta lines. Hydrogen have 1 electron . Most probably it should be in ground state. So why we get hydrogen spectrum from higher energy levels to 2 nd energy level??
Light is a kind of a transverse wave with a frequency, when it hits matter , matter gets disturbed at the same frequency, matter will disturb neighborhood matter in the same frequency,
Matter should emit its own energy at a lower energy. Or frequency
9:00 to skip requisite knowledge
Off topic but if at the edge of an event horizon the gravitational field strength is c^2 does that mean the relativistic circumference of a black hole is infinite?
Are two photons with different wave number identical i.e bosons
Of distinguishable?