I Solved A Differential Equation For y

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 лип 2024
  • 🤩 Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (aplusbi)
    Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! 🧡🥰🎉🥳🧡
    / @sybermathshorts
    / @aplusbi
    ⭐ Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
    My merch → teespring.com/stores/sybermat...
    Follow me → / sybermath
    Subscribe → ua-cam.com/users/SyberMath?sub...
    ⭐ Suggest → forms.gle/A5bGhTyZqYw937W58
    If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
    intent/tweet?text...
    #calculusproblems #differentialequations #calculus
    via @UA-cam @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
    I Solved An Exponential Equation with e and π: • I Solved An Exponentia...
    A Surprising Exponential Equation: • A Surprising Exponenti...
    SIMILAR PROBLEM
    I Solved a Very Irrational Equation: • I Solved a Very Irrati...
    PLAYLISTS 🎵 :
    Number Theory Problems: • Number Theory Problems
    Challenging Math Problems: • Challenging Math Problems
    Trigonometry Problems: • Trigonometry Problems
    Diophantine Equations and Systems: • Diophantine Equations ...
    Calculus: • Calculus

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @thecrazzxz3383
    @thecrazzxz3383 6 місяців тому +1

    Certainely the most original title of them all

  • @burlfromlondon
    @burlfromlondon 8 місяців тому +4

    It was slightly confusing using C as both the constant of integration and an intermediate variable, which could have been, say, T instead

  • @robertcotton8481
    @robertcotton8481 8 місяців тому +2

    C+2 would just be c since c arbitrary

  • @wtspman
    @wtspman 8 місяців тому

    Could you get a simpler expression for y by simplifying the parts under the radical? I see (x+c+2)^2 - 4 and I think expanding the square term will allow you to get rid of the 4, but without solving it on paper, I’m not sure if it can be taken any further.

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  8 місяців тому

      I don't think but I didn't check, either 😜

  • @bobbyheffley4955
    @bobbyheffley4955 8 місяців тому

    If k=-1 or 1, you have a perfect square.

  • @vacuumcarexpo
    @vacuumcarexpo 8 місяців тому +1

    This is just the same as solving a cubic equation using Cardano's formula.

  • @mcwulf25
    @mcwulf25 8 місяців тому +1

    You didn't fancy differentiating the answer to demonstrate that it's correct in the original equation?

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  8 місяців тому +1

      I forgot about that 😲

  • @rakenzarnsworld2
    @rakenzarnsworld2 8 місяців тому

    f(y) = y^3-3y^2

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  8 місяців тому

      can we solve for y?

  • @user-sx6vo6ne5f
    @user-sx6vo6ne5f 8 місяців тому

    ...pierdolnąłeś się - powinno być a^6 - ka^3 - 1 = 0