Ta-Nehisi Coates & Ezra Edelman on “O.J.: Made In America”

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
  • Ezra Edelman, director of O.J. Simpson: Made in America, with The Atlantic's Ta-Nehisi Coates at The Atlantic's Washington Ideas Forum. More videos: f4a.tv/2czAPR2

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @yellolab09
    @yellolab09 5 років тому +4

    Beautifully made film.. Will break your heat.

  • @johnhollins8749
    @johnhollins8749 5 років тому +4

    There should be many more documentaries made. Such as Zemmerman made in America. To include certain people in our government, etc.

  • @kponly
    @kponly 6 років тому +3

    Great interview. I'm gonna check out the movie.

  • @marshacreary9771
    @marshacreary9771 6 років тому

    Can we talk about his old TV ads/commercials?

  • @SIKE01
    @SIKE01 4 роки тому +1

    the documentary missed the celebration of white people in Buffalo, NY of OJ's acquittal.

  • @beckyrivera8600
    @beckyrivera8600 4 роки тому

    What was good for the goose may have been good for the gander, but that doesn't justify that the jury still got it wrong.

  • @riverebec1
    @riverebec1 5 років тому +2

    The jury got it right?!

  • @EqualizerPG
    @EqualizerPG 8 років тому +1

    Right

  • @timothydye1316
    @timothydye1316 5 місяців тому

    He cheated on his 1st wife. Nicole dated an adulterer.

  • @GiovannaIamele
    @GiovannaIamele 3 місяці тому

    This film maker seems to be in love with the vicious murderer he celebrates him!

  • @MooreVoicesMedia
    @MooreVoicesMedia 5 років тому +2

    While I marvel, admire, and admire you two in your contributions to lit and art, if the job of the state is to provide the burden of proof of guilt and they don't, what evidence do the two of you have that the state could not provide, that makes you believe beyond a shadow of a doubt O.J. Simpson is guilty?

    • @olivierkepo
      @olivierkepo 4 роки тому +1

      MooreVoices the evidence is overwhelming, from circumstantial to physical evidence. The blood, shoeprints from an extremely rare pair of shoes, the glove, plus the relationship between the two, the history of domestic violence and the lack of any other suspect. The only thing missing was the murder weapon. But I agree, the prosecution argued their case so poorly that they ended up losing.

  • @lennarthagen3638
    @lennarthagen3638 Рік тому

    OJ an innocent man.

    • @nl887
      @nl887 Рік тому +2

      Someones delusional

    • @keithbell9348
      @keithbell9348 5 місяців тому

      OJ was found innocent.
      Doesn't mean he did not murder those 2 people.
      Learn the difference

  • @anthonyosburn3786
    @anthonyosburn3786 5 років тому +1

    I don't see why people are so in love with they ideal that he killed to people. I believe that o.j did not kill anyone. The ideal that o.j didn't kill his wife is compelling. People say he killed his wife because he is black because there was no evidence that linked o.j to the murders but that's my opinion. But it's the ideal that because he is black that means he is capable of killing and really the irony of the whole story.

    • @beckyrivera8600
      @beckyrivera8600 4 роки тому +2

      You're delusional.

    • @anthonyosburn3786
      @anthonyosburn3786 4 роки тому

      @@beckyrivera8600 no Becky I'm telling the truth and I can't help if you are bigot and racist. I can't believe that you can not see the flaws in that case.

    • @beckyrivera8600
      @beckyrivera8600 4 роки тому +1

      @@anthonyosburn3786 So believing all the physical evidence makes me a bigot and a racist? I can't help it if your clueless and incapable of making a reasoned and substantive argument.

    • @anthonyosburn3786
      @anthonyosburn3786 4 роки тому

      @@beckyrivera8600 I got my reasons and you have yours so I really don't care about your opinions Becky.

    • @nl887
      @nl887 Рік тому

      Theres was tons of evidence that showed his guilt

  • @donovans6472
    @donovans6472 3 роки тому

    if ezra edelman had believed that O.J was innocent and told people that i doubt his movie would be released and getting as much recognition.....its the popular pick and it is expected to believe that O.J is guilty but everybody needs to look further into this before they really decide on his guilt....there is so much more information about this case now than before....furthermore everybody is just saying O.J is guilty because of his abuse history....however every abuser doesn't end up killing his wife...if so then what is the argument for the man who kills his wife that hasn't had a history of abuse or has never abused her before........

    • @debramorales4283
      @debramorales4283 2 роки тому +3

      He's GUILTY Because Of The EVIDENCE!!!!

    • @debramorales4283
      @debramorales4283 2 роки тому

      You're Speaking Out Of Ignorance...NOT Intelligence...And ANY BODY That Defends That POS..Is Just As GUILTY As He Is

    • @bedshaped85
      @bedshaped85 2 роки тому +2

      @@debramorales4283 exactly! Sad part is 25 plus years later and people still try to hold onto a possibility he didn't do it.
      They forget the Bronco chase, his suicide note, his BLOOD, hair, and fibers mixed in the crime scene. His bloody shoe prints and blood at his HOME... we forget the average person can be really DUMB lol