Αργυρούπολι και Αρμάνος; Ο κύριος υποβλήθηκε όντως σε τραγική ανάμειξη, δεν είναι καθαρόαιμος άσε που δεν ξέρει να μιλάει την γλώσσα η οποία είναι στα αλήθεια εκλεπτυσμένα σοφιστική και μυστηριώδης και όχι σαν να εκτοξεύεις βραχνάδες ή σπαμωδική.
To be honest, the vlachs are a mysterious people. Their origins are unknown. Sure, they may be romanian in origin, who knows, I mean judging by their language it could give a trace of their origin. But even if that's the case, they've been heavily assimilated and intermixed through out the balkans that are barely romanian anymore. According to genetic studies, vlachs genetically differ from each other and are pretty identical to the nations of the countries that they live in. This, in theory, might prove that the vlachs are truly latinised native peoples, and therefore not JUST romanians, and that aromanian isn't necessarily a romanian dialect, but rather an eastern romance language, like istro-romanian, megleno-romanian and romanian, and the only reason they are similar is because they all belong to a branch, rather than being dialects of one specific language. Again, just a theory, not proven. Then here comes the name "vlach" and "wallachian". Both are the same word (meaning differs though), *however*, the word vlach is of german origin (from valhaz) and it meant foreigners and more specifically, celtic speakers. According to some historians, the word vlach was used by slavs (and maybe other peoples) to refer to the latin speakers of the balkans (later it was also used to refer to shepherds and nomads in general, like the sarakatsani, even though they are greek in origin). But if that's the case, don't vlachs call themselves armani or rramani? Honestly, the debate over the origin of the vlachs are just questions, theories, little evidence and more questions. Let's just keep what DNA tests offer and what vlachs themselves feel about their own identity. They feel albanian, greek, serbian, bulgarian and romanian. If that's how they like it, then discussion is closed.
εεεεεεε τι ομορφα τα λεει ο συαναδελφος
Για του νεότερους & το αρχείο: 150 δραχμές (που λέει ο Κύριος) είναι περίπου 0,45€ και όχι 50€.
χαχαχα.. (1:00) πολύ ωραίο Γκόγκα!
Συμφωνώ και, συνάδω με τον Βλάχο τον livend.
μπραβο !!!!
Εχουμε συμβάλει όμως τα τελευταία 300 χρόνια αρκετα στισ ιστορίες αυτων των χωρών .Να σου θυμίσω τουσ Κωλεττη,Αβερωφ Ζαππα κ.α.
ΔΩΣΕ ΠΡΟΕΔΡΕ....ΔΩΣΕ
5* * * * *
Μπράβο πατρίδα.
Da foarte frumos 👍👍👍👏👏👏👏
Τωρα το χωριο αυτο θα έχει ηδη ερημωσει!
Thanks. I really appreciate your friendship. Hugs.
πεστα.....προεδρε!!!!
Ξέρεις κάνεις το τραγούδι που παίζει από πίσω?
Ροβολατα ροβολατα τα γίδια Κ τα πρόβατα
πεστα.....προεδρε!!!!1
Este limba română
Este limba armaneasca, limba romanica de 1000 de ani. Nu suntem romani, greci, albanezi, turci si nimic altceva!!
Αργυρούπολι και Αρμάνος; Ο κύριος υποβλήθηκε όντως σε τραγική ανάμειξη, δεν είναι καθαρόαιμος άσε που δεν ξέρει να μιλάει την γλώσσα η οποία είναι στα αλήθεια εκλεπτυσμένα σοφιστική και μυστηριώδης και όχι σαν να εκτοξεύεις βραχνάδες ή σπαμωδική.
Μια χαρά τη μιλάει τη γλώσσα....
Aromanians are romanians 🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴
😂😂😂😂
In your dreams
These people are: Latinised people. This one happen to be Greek.
Another one can be Slavic. Like you.
Romanians are Slavs!
Latinised Greeks have no connection with you.
To be honest, the vlachs are a mysterious people. Their origins are unknown. Sure, they may be romanian in origin, who knows, I mean judging by their language it could give a trace of their origin. But even if that's the case, they've been heavily assimilated and intermixed through out the balkans that are barely romanian anymore. According to genetic studies, vlachs genetically differ from each other and are pretty identical to the nations of the countries that they live in. This, in theory, might prove that the vlachs are truly latinised native peoples, and therefore not JUST romanians, and that aromanian isn't necessarily a romanian dialect, but rather an eastern romance language, like istro-romanian, megleno-romanian and romanian, and the only reason they are similar is because they all belong to a branch, rather than being dialects of one specific language. Again, just a theory, not proven. Then here comes the name "vlach" and "wallachian". Both are the same word (meaning differs though), *however*, the word vlach is of german origin (from valhaz) and it meant foreigners and more specifically, celtic speakers. According to some historians, the word vlach was used by slavs (and maybe other peoples) to refer to the latin speakers of the balkans (later it was also used to refer to shepherds and nomads in general, like the sarakatsani, even though they are greek in origin).
But if that's the case, don't vlachs call themselves armani or rramani? Honestly, the debate over the origin of the vlachs are just questions, theories, little evidence and more questions. Let's just keep what DNA tests offer and what vlachs themselves feel about their own identity. They feel albanian, greek, serbian, bulgarian and romanian. If that's how they like it, then discussion is closed.