It's always nice and informative to see your videos, i would like to see a video of yours on the Athens Larnaka route with Airbus Cyprus or Aegean. THANKS
There is something I have been wondering about the trim setting: I see that people who fly the Airbus for a living look at the CG number in the "Fuel Pred" page and then set the trim wheel to approximately that number. However the performance calculator gives you an exact trim up or down number. Wouldn't it be better to then switch to the "F/CTL" display and match the displayed trim number to the one the performance calculator gives you? Because when you use the trim wheel for something like 29.4CG you have to eyeball where the .4 is, whereas with the CTL display you can match the exact number of trim up or down.
Doesn't really matter. If you want to be 110% sure, but I always just set according to the wheel. SOP doesn't say set in accordance with SD page it says set as per the wheel so it's perfectly fine to do so.
The A320 FCOM clearly says: "Set takeoff CG on pitch trim handwheel". In this particular point I can only speak from A330 experience. In the A330 FCOM it also says "For this purpose use the ECAM’s CG indication". The A320 FCOM does not make any such reference to where you should take the CG from. That's why I take it from the loadsheet. Others may use other sources. Now on the A330 you will almost always see a difference between the CG from the loadsheet - on which the takeoff performance calculator is based - and what the airplane indicates to you. The ECAM indication takes priority over the loadsheet here because the FCMC calculates this value "live" and is not based on the standard weights and their distribution assumed in the loadsheet. When we enter the CG after we received the loadsheet we check the FCMC calculated CG against the loadsheet and they have to be within 2% of one another. That is a HUGE difference in the trim setting. What's the moral of the story? Airbus wants us to do it this way. On the A320 they don't specify the source of the CG. A difference of 0.abit doesn't matter anyway as your source data won't be accurate anyway.
yeah the flickering textures are a thing with their stuff, i get it a lot with malaga too ... think malaga was mk as well, generally though their scenery is awesome
Have you ever tried the freeware fsltl traffic? What are the reasons you are using the payware version from JF? Is it more fps friendly/better optimized?
As always a nicely made flight Looks like you fly rather light in the Sim only 900 kilos for 194 pax !!? that pretty light I belive, you should try it heavier with like 2-3Tons on bags instead Also FL360 heading east ? shouldn't it be FL350 instead following the RVSM vertical rules ?
It's already out. Personally I'm not a fan of MK Studios policy of "updated airports" and then sell them to you again for 15€ update price if you had the previous version. Often the improvements are so marginal in my opinion, that they don't warrant to pay that much again for a scenery you already own. BTW is there a reason you have PG switched off, Emi? The Lisbon approach really comes alvive with it, it is one of my favourites.
First of all, congratulations on your videos, we learn a lot from them. In this particular one, I have something to question. The scenery is wrong in the approach, the southern bank of the Tagus River is a disaster, and the 25th of April Bridge is completely wrong! What default scenery do you use?
I don't think there are any known bugs that would actually be bad enough to ground the aircraft. Try to open a support ticket with Fenix, they're pretty good with support!
Work in OCC. Love the PF PM roleplay and briefings; they add a nice touch of realism. Liked and subbed.
Thank you very much!
I’m curious if you will post any videos reviewing the new 330 by toliss ?
EMI we all want the toliss a330 video
I enjoy your watching your flights. I always learn something new that I should be doing.
Thank you sir for the update 👍
I think a payware LPPT addon should really include the iconic bridge
It's always nice and informative to see your videos, i would like to see a video of yours on the Athens Larnaka route with Airbus Cyprus or Aegean. THANKS
LPPT Rebooted is definitely worth it!
And Atelic’s Madeira is so good.
yep, they're both top sceneries!
There is something I have been wondering about the trim setting:
I see that people who fly the Airbus for a living look at the CG number in the "Fuel Pred" page and then set the trim wheel to approximately that number. However the performance calculator gives you an exact trim up or down number.
Wouldn't it be better to then switch to the "F/CTL" display and match the displayed trim number to the one the performance calculator gives you? Because when you use the trim wheel for something like 29.4CG you have to eyeball where the .4 is, whereas with the CTL display you can match the exact number of trim up or down.
Doesn't really matter. If you want to be 110% sure, but I always just set according to the wheel. SOP doesn't say set in accordance with SD page it says set as per the wheel so it's perfectly fine to do so.
The A320 FCOM clearly says: "Set takeoff CG on pitch trim handwheel".
In this particular point I can only speak from A330 experience. In the A330 FCOM it also says "For this purpose use the ECAM’s CG indication". The A320 FCOM does not make any such reference to where you should take the CG from. That's why I take it from the loadsheet. Others may use other sources.
Now on the A330 you will almost always see a difference between the CG from the loadsheet - on which the takeoff performance calculator is based - and what the airplane indicates to you. The ECAM indication takes priority over the loadsheet here because the FCMC calculates this value "live" and is not based on the standard weights and their distribution assumed in the loadsheet. When we enter the CG after we received the loadsheet we check the FCMC calculated CG against the loadsheet and they have to be within 2% of one another. That is a HUGE difference in the trim setting.
What's the moral of the story? Airbus wants us to do it this way. On the A320 they don't specify the source of the CG.
A difference of 0.abit doesn't matter anyway as your source data won't be accurate anyway.
yeah the flickering textures are a thing with their stuff, i get it a lot with malaga too ... think malaga was mk as well, generally though their scenery is awesome
I totally missed release notes that they've implemented AOC ATIS request. Nice addition
What Asobo doing with the beautifull Bridge on the APP to RWY 02 ?
The iconic bridge "Ponte 25 Abril" is missing. This is a serious fault.
Fun fact NEO means “New Engine Option” creative naming on airbus part😂
Have you ever tried the freeware fsltl traffic? What are the reasons you are using the payware version from JF? Is it more fps friendly/better optimized?
As always a nicely made flight
Looks like you fly rather light in the Sim only 900 kilos for 194 pax !!? that pretty light I belive, you should try it heavier with like 2-3Tons on bags instead
Also FL360 heading east ? shouldn't it be FL350 instead following the RVSM vertical rules ?
Ok, nice video, everything cool and wonderful but BUT. Pls show me your MSFS grapichs settings because your sim looks amazing!!thanks😂😅
Are you interested in reviewing the Toliss a339? Would be nice to hear your opinion on it! :)
Shame in cruise VLS is above GD and alpha prot nowhere to be seen. Hopefully they fix that soon
Are the wipers really that noisy? Its unbearable! How often do you use rain rplnt?
Why the PACK 2 off after startup?
saves fuel
Hello,
My gsx don’t working because it say that gsx in warp to tral mode but it doesn’t working
Haven't heard of that one yet, but it sounds like something activation related? Have you tried the FSDT installer to check if it's activated properly?
Thx for the video. Are the real life wipers as annoying as the sim ones 😅
They sound as annoying and are even more useless at removing rain from your windshield.
@@A330Driver Suppose Fenix did a good job then 😂
Hello, what are your graphics settings? I have the same CPU/GPU and it looks like yours handle the game easier than mine
Hi, they're mostly on ULTRA. I have screenshots of them up on the community page of the channel.
@@A330Driver alright thanks! I’ll try them :)
Do you work for Eurowings Discover?
No comment on that particular question, sorry ;-)
Someone leaked the other day on the forums that he flies the a340-700 for Air Berlin
When the LPPT V2 is it going to be released?
today
It's already out. Personally I'm not a fan of MK Studios policy of "updated airports" and then sell them to you again for 15€ update price if you had the previous version. Often the improvements are so marginal in my opinion, that they don't warrant to pay that much again for a scenery you already own.
BTW is there a reason you have PG switched off, Emi? The Lisbon approach really comes alvive with it, it is one of my favourites.
@@Quotenwagnerianer I just got annoyed by those constant PG disconnects, leading to a large message popping up on short final.
First of all, congratulations on your videos, we learn a lot from them. In this particular one, I have something to question. The scenery is wrong in the approach, the southern bank of the Tagus River is a disaster, and the 25th of April Bridge is completely wrong! What default scenery do you use?
Yeah. The bridge.
Not even on mfsx is that bad.
Still, the airport looks damn nice, though.
Had to park Fenix due to cabin altitude issues.
did you try closing the window?
I don't think there are any known bugs that would actually be bad enough to ground the aircraft. Try to open a support ticket with Fenix, they're pretty good with support!