If you had a say in where money went, where would you put it? 🚀 A quick thanks to Audible for sponsoring this video. Go to www.audible.com/aperture or text 'aperture' to 500 500 to get one free audiobook, 2 free Audible originals and a 30-day free trial.
into the poor people instead in of these things... from when i was 10 i already said they will never reach space. Now 30 years later and still i say the same. How many people could be helped in those 30 years. Glad i am not so naive to believe this shit.... And i never will. Do you ever think if they can live on Mars they would take you there????? hahaha No way... they will create a world where they could dictate but that is never gonna happen so let them do these things.... Truth will follow as always. Just be patience enough.
New oil production technologies revolutionize oil production and turn the US from an oil importer to an oil exporter. 99% of the country - thinks that we want other countries oil.
Us regularl folks are the war mongering rich asses that run the world though... lol i think there will always be more good people than bad, possibly to good peoples avail.. because you dont need alot of bad people, to control alot of good folk.
It's the same problem with all research, all around the world. Most people are so far away from anything regarding to science & economics they won't understand the value it brings to all of us, because it doesn't benefit them directly right now. LHC is prime example.
@@newhorizon3229 for military and other governmental things, i see it that the gov doesnt see space exploration as a priority with everything going on around the world. thats why spacex and private companies exist
Ive often wondered the same thing. People think the military is "protecting" them? say what? America is in a unique position geographically that pretty much makes a land invasion impossible as we could see it coming from weeks away. TBH the military should go back to its actual job of defending the United States, not policing the world, and give 75% of its budget to NASA.
They dont need GoFundMe. USA should drastically cut military budget. Russia has great army with budget of "just" 70 billion. USA has budget of 680 billion for military. that is crazy money waste.
Its funny how this was released a few days before NASA announced returning to the moon and having people stay for longer periods of time by 2024. I hope they actually give us some kind of second space race to mars against SpaceX or even better if they somehow merge into one.
going to the moon and staying is actually one of the biggest steps for going to mars, as a start from the moon might not sound very useful, but it is, it makes it easier to escape the gravitational pull of the earth, thus wasting less fuel going for mars
I bet most of the time engineers spend at NASA is finding out ways to make their projects cheaper rather than actually coming up with new ideas, that would be kinda sad :/
Making cheaper rockets is the same thing as coming up with new ideas. It's like when you play ksp in career mode rather than sandbox, you would make more efficient, cheap rockets that get you farther than the less efficient rockets.
Super Drip just look it up, read some books about, there’s so much, a lot of it so complicated, that it’d be too much for me to type out, but it’s out there, and it’s revolutionary. Research it yourself.
I would LOVE to see NASA's budget tripled to nearly $60 Billion. $20 billion to maintain its current projects including the ISS, $20 Billion for Gateway and Moon missions(Constructing permanent bases), and $20 billion for Mars and Beyond.
I would prefer to see NASA begin to consistently bring in programs on time and on budget. Remember that a lot of space exploration was cancelled to pay for the cost over-runs on the JWST. And a true commitment from NASA to go to the moon by 2025 would help. It's hard to grab peoples imaginations with: "We'll go to Mars in the late 2030's - maybe."
Colin Campbell Yes. One of the main reasons we were able to build the technology from the ground up, land people on the moon, and send them home safely was because of time constraints.
@@colincampbell767Cost overruns and delays would be solved with an increased budget. Limited budgets mean NASA can't properly fund projects, which means delays in work. And delays in work mean more money spent.
Nasa should open something like "you donate... we show you how we work" I would easily pay 25-50$ monthly just to see what they're doing and working on.
who's trying to kill each other all the time? you people look pathetic with your virtue signaling and supposed better plan for humans, absolutely clueless and naive.
Ironically we aren't really trying to kill each other that much anymore. We live in the most peaceful times in the whole human history but at the same time we invest most money in military. Is the peace maintained by the military spending or we could just remove 50% of that and give it to NASA. Probably no one knows what is the right answer. All I know that space agencies need more funding and public perception must be changed to support space exploration. If people are sold on this, the money will start to come naturally.
It's because of jobs. If people didn't have to work money wouldn't be a problem. However you can't live off the backs of others. Hence why we have money. Money motivates people to do jobs. If you want to sit at home with WiFi someone has to work at the wifi place in case it malfunctions. But why can't they be at home too like you?. Money wouldn't be a problem if we had robots though. If robots did our jobs then we could all quit our jobs and money wouldn't be an issue. The world would continue to work the same way but instead of humans working we'd all be home chilling. Make NASA build robots
USA: Drops funding for NASA NASA: There is oil and unclaimed land on the moon News: NASA budget jumps to 10 trillion Edit 1: Milion hraje: I guess you know that for oil you need life forms before millions of years... ;)
USA after colonising the Moon: drops funding again. NASA: y'know, there are communists on Mars. They call it the red planet for a reason. *NASA budget jumps to 20 trillion*
@@noobkilla3 To the best of my knowledge, you can donate to NASA, NASA just can't solicit them--added info below. However, you're better off donating to a political campaign that supports your opinion, as, like restaurants with waiters, tipping (donations) for an invaluable service could have detrimental affects on political discourse concerning NASA's public funding. Make check out to: GIFTS and Donations Trust Fund Include a memo noting the destination account number 80X8980. Use the following address: NASA Office of CFO Dir Fin. Mgmt NASA Shared Services Center Building 1111, Jerry Hlass Road Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
It's funny, but that _could_ work. I'm not US citizen but I'd love to donate to space programs... NASA has done a lot for everyone, I'd donate $10 each month even if I don't have a lot of money. Edit: I'd probably donate more depending on how things work and if other people jump in too.
@@MrFreakHeavy They would have to do it without anything being offered. There is a law that prevents them from getting into obligations other than what congress and the united states government gives them, and patreon might be considered to conflict with that.
@@izaicslinux6961 I thought there would conflicts like that. It doesn't have to patreon. I just suggest something that is easy to use. It can be an organization associated with NASA, have a donation/patreon website so that people can give money each month (or similar) and then at the end of each month (or period) the money will be donated to them. I think the problem is Accessibility. If people could just as easily donate money for them and in return they could, for example, share their advancements every so often, just as positive feedback so people feel encouraged and happy to provide (thinking that they are contributing and feeling empowered, "I'm actually doing good for the world") would be very cool and I'm sure they will get a lot of support. But then, maybe very few people will help. Who knows. I just think that there may be a high possibility that things could end up helping them. I just hope donations like that won't affect their relationship with the government, making them think "you don't need tax money anymore with all those donations." Although that could be one hell of an achievement for humanity -- with the sheer power of altruism and goodwill humans could advance to a better future. I have a dream...
Our inability to work together as a species will be our downfall. Look what we have done to our only place to live. Elon Musk appraised our future here on earth and didn't like what he saw. All of the products he makes are like the basics of what he will need on Mars. Electric transportation, tunneling, fuel processing, neuro-technology, expert systems, global internet, smart power storage and of course the jewel in his crown is equipment reusability. I really hope he is successful in achieving his goals.
Commenting because I want more people like you to start expressing the importance of this and how we can help the Earth too. Thank you for being a great human...
Exactly! I constantly think about what earth would be like if we explored space more. Most likely a moon and/or a mars colony. Probably a Dyson swarm, giving us unforseen amount of energy, allowing potential deep space colonies, probably a quicker discovery of exotic matter, allowing us to bend space and time into wormhole, allowing cross galaxy movement. If we give more money to NASA we will end up with a galactic civilization. I care way to much about this.
What do you guys think is the best way to get technological advancement. Through the solving of an issue, like needing clean water and getting rid of sewage, you would need an aquifer and a sewer. Technologies that need to be developed based on the issue of these two things. Or do you guys think technological advancement would be more efficient for the sake of finding technology to (not immediately) benefit humanity, like building sewers and aquifers would be.
@@rickydawn6313 It's not as black and white as that I think. It's a hard problem to solve. I feel that its a matter of sustainability. No matter how we do it, it's a question of "will it last?" like how efficient is it? I hope this makes sense, I wrote this at 5AM lol
Aperture: Talking calmly about how it may be time to return to the moon with nice music in the background *Ad plays* Ad: Mr Beast yelling at me about Honey Idk why I found that so funny
All big science and space content creators should start a NASA budget increase public request. Make people actively show their interest in space again. Make their congress representatives realize space is still interesting for the average citizen. We need to go back.
You're not wrong, but pro-science campaigns are already prevalent. The problem is that anti-science interests are responding with growing followings. What you're proposing has been shown to be more difficult than we expected
@@SpainSpace The problem with anti-science is that most of 95% of thems are flat earthers, and very sadly............flat earthers cannot believe anything others than just theirs insanity
NASA: ao when we will start the mars colonzing prjoect USA Govermemt: um no we no have much money right now maybe later NASA: there is oil on mars and we heard russia is going there by next year USA goverment: get the mars rocket and supplies ready by the next 2 months and we are going to mars right now
Best video you've made information wise. People have no idea how much NASA gets the shaft in comparison to the rest of the government. They need 10X the funding they're getting.
Many states still teach creationism, reject climate change and vaccines, and are banning abortions left and right because of religious reasons. You think legislators and representatives of said states are gonna prioritize funding NASA?
56 million per day.... for decades of delay and cancelation? Any person not getting triggered from this is a person I need to pray for. So sad really sad a huge percentage of the military budget goes to space and Nasa. What a bunch of hogwash. And I once dreamed of being an astronaut and studying space science for years. Now after seeing how it really works I'd wager a huge share of the 56 mil. per day budget goes to marketing and promotion and they have the help of the masses not only from the taxes but most people believe Nasa that means every author teacher .... When all people believe in you and your tricking them who cares if they give you money? You're gonna take it anyway....
@@stonecat676 Reject climate change? No, they reject the marxist lie that climate change is made by man. And instead embrace reality that the climate has been changing for a billion years sometimes more sometimes less than now. And until you have an accurate measurement of CO2 levels from every decade going back to atleast the last million years, STFU.
NASA: we could’ve been to mars by now if you weren’t so stingy... U.S. Military: hmm? Couldn’t hear you over the 3 new aircraft carriers I bought. NASA: YOU WHAT?
If we'er going to give a huge chunk of money to Boeing and Lockheed, etc. every year, then we may as well have it be for spacecraft instead of fighter and bomber aircraft. Seriously, more money is spent on the F-22 per year than on NASA.
True, we don’t have to be prepping the military like WWlll is going to break out tomorrow, hopefully it never will. While we’re at it maybe give some money to education, medical advancements, making debt go down rather than up.
If by correctly mean to put more budget to nasa and reduce from military. It would be the most shit ass country it the world becuz many country always wanna clip america ass and turn it to dust. U seem it as peace, only becuz the military is there so they wouldnt make a move. Without ur military budget. Many country on the entire world find a way and hatch a plan to destroy america.
@@realdeal5712 That's ridiculous. If we cut the military budget in HALF we would still have the most powerful military in the world and if we gave that half to nasa, we would without question be the most Infrastructurally and Technologically advanced country in the world without question. Do you realize that a lot of the newest and most advanced military technologies originate from space related research? In this way we can have our cake and eat it too. It's honestly so simple.
@@A____G the problem is too many countries want to end the USA and cutting it in half would still make it the largest in the world but that would make it les than many enemies combined like Russia and China but with the current one no. However it is a bit too high there should be small cutbacks to help NASA
Gabriel Lins and why is that they want to destroy us in the first place? It’s because we put our noses in other country’s personal business where they don’t belong. And even then, the country that has the other half of the 93% of nukes owned by two countries (Aka, Russia) is on okay terms with us after we both decided that blowing up the entire world to get rid of each other is probably not a good idea. Maybe if we acted like a more polite country and minded our own business, instead of starting wars in the Middle East for oil and ‘freedom’, maybe we wouldn’t be targeted by literally every country on the planet.
You can't return somewhere you've never been. Rockets do not work in a vacuum as the medium by which they Propel themselves is simply not present. Use your brain for once in your life and investigate what you were taught and told to find out if it's actually true.
@@ExploreYourWorld-oo3jd That's pretty ironic, considering the fact that you have access to the information required to actually understand nearly anything you want.
Kaledrone /\ because when two groups try to destroy each other using various technologies, believe it or not, they actually innovate that technology to one up the other group. Hence this is the reason that when wars happen and we try destroy others that we tend to have the most technological advancements in the shortest period of time. I reference the 2 world wars and the Cold War as perfect examples. If you want word peace then disarmament and societies ruled by women is what you should seek. If you want technological advancement then competition and societies dominated by men is what you should seek. Simple as that mate. Humans are humans and they want to one up each other and acquire more than just their basic needs. It’s what sets us apart from animals.
Actually it's not 600 billion. Around 150-200 bils goes away as a foreign aid to Israel, Egypt, North Korea, Marroco, Mexico and other countries. You would be shocked how much money and military hardware flows to them. Then again, don't tell anyone, or else you get to be called nazi / islamophobe.
@@nosamsemaj9150 Okay, I read another of your comments in another thread and I don't get what your problem with women is. I'm a man but I don't think that women can't lead or can't be as good as men in certain jobs. Of course there are difference and men and women will both be different at different things but something gives me the impression that you just think women are weak and unfit to be leaders. Correct me if I am wrong.
@@patrickhouston3882 Uh...did you even watch the video? He literally said NASA was founded because the U.S got jealous USSR sent a fucking ball into space. The whole space race was started to prove the U.S has a bigger wee wee.
Yeah, its insanely hard to find hidden gems on UA-cam. If only recommendations didn't send me content I already know of but instead, content I wouldn't know of. Like when I binge a hidden gem for while, and then those videos are the only thing I see in my recommended for a while. I like some of the videos not all, so stop sending fricken fortnite videos.
@@pikapolar3966 you talking about testing sls using ksp. The delta v needed for kerbin orbit is ~3500m/s delta v. Earth orbit is 28,000k/s. A kilometer of delta v is 1000m/s.
I just graduated highschool, I know the generation we're in is the one who's going to be in the midst of a new era of space exploration and I'm excited to see it.
@@RunnerETRC you mean a new era of CGI propaganda right? Rockets do not work in a vacuum. Why? the means by which they Propel themselves (with thrust) is not possible in a vacuum. Why? because the medium by which the thrust pushes off of (atmospheric pressure) is not present. You believe that you have been educated when in reality you have merely been indoctrinated. There is truth and then there is belief. you may think you know the truth right now, but in reality all you have is belief. Why? Your education was an indoctrination into a belief system. Much of this so-called 'science' that you take as fact and you believe in.. is not empirical, testable, repeatable or observable by multiple independent parties all achieving the same result. It's all pseudoscience. So here's the big question... are you going to remain a sheep and regurgitate what you think you know? what you were taught and told? or ....will you choose to become the lion? and fearlessly investigate for yourself regardless of where the investigation may lead? The choice is yours.
If they just put the sls budget into space x they would probably already be there. NASA needs more money but they also need to do better at their spending.
@@ExploreYourWorld-oo3jd what's your problem, non believers like you always rant on the internet can't you just do something else and what's the point of you watching this video if you're the "know it all" and stop us from this deception video you could've spent your "All knowing" mind to solve deforestation and climate change
People in general have a narrow view of the universe .. if more were educated about the wonders of our universe more discoveries would be made, like mining asteroids, a lot of money there waiting to be made. We are so far behind in space technology, we need more funding.
TKS_Adem that’s great, we need more people to become more educated with the universe and how it works. All the best have fun, because it will be an amazing experience.
As of right now that is all a fairy tail. Nothing even close to this has happened. We are no closer to accomplishing these feats then we where 50 years ago.
In every strategy game i played before i gather lots of resources and become super rich i make sure my defense is all set or other players will plunder my resources and invade me or my allies. Terrorists are real.
It wasn't Nixon, NASA started to roll up at the same time all federal agencies were forced to fulfill diversity quotas. Read "whitey on the moon" for what kind of thinking led to today.
Bogdan Bogdanoff Good Lord. Are you seriously blaming racial equality for the lack of NASA funding? That is one of the most idiotic things I’ve heard in a while.
@@LukaTomato ... by selling things to NASA. You kinda need to actually consider this one a little more closely, because spacex runs for profit by giving people a service, a service that is mainly required by groups like, yup, NASA. it's really not funding in that sense.
@@LukaTomato NASA provided the seed money out of desperation - they were looking at the Space Shuttle retiring and had nothing that they could replace it with for at least another decade. However - SpaceX is making money by providing services to their customers. NASA is merely one of those customers. NASA needs to get out of the earth-to-orbit business entirely - the SLS is already obsolete. In fact - NASA should focus solely on payloads and contract out the getting those payloads to their destination.
@@colincampbell767 Actually you'll find that most of their money still does come from NASA, and the military. Your average commercial payload contract is nowhere near enough to sustain and grow a company like SpaceX. Also NASA aren't building SLS, Boeing and a few others are. Oh, and SLS? Obsolete? LOL
@@LukaTomato Looking at the SpaceX launch manifest it appears than only about 1/3rd of SpaceX launches are NASA and the US military. And yes, the SLS is obsolete. At $1 billion (not counting the payload) per mission the money can be far better spent on payloads and simply hire somebody to get them into orbit. $1 billion would only make sense if the spacecraft were reusable. We don't even have anything resembling a firm launch date for it's first mission. The taxpayer would be better off shutting down the SLS and invest the money into modular and reusable spaceship components that can be assembled in orbit. And simply pay somebody to get them there.
@@MrDuck-oi3qc People don't want to pay tax for something dumb like military or wall. MANY people gladly pay few bucks extra tax for space and technology.
For what? Please inform me what NASA has done to impact us other than emotionally? What they talk about doesn't effect our daily lives here... on earth. They can talk about black holes and other galaxies but dude...it's all fantasy. Entertainment at best.
@@deltainfinium869 yes I did and I think 20 billion a year is a good investment because not even cancer research gets 20 billion in a year and we spend more on space programs then we do finding a cure for cancer
James Quinn The thing is a cure for cancer is entirely different then space exploration. The video literally says we have the capability to sustain ourselves on the Moon, we don’t even need half the budget of the military to do so. By your logic, we should halt all funding that isn’t deemed as “important” as cancer research.
For all the "NASA should start a Patreon" jokes... you are absolutely correct. In fact, all government programs should follow a system of voluntary funding. That way you are the one who decides where you money goes, and not some self-serving bureaucrat.
@jake black well they currently have a plan in place called ARTEMIS that will, you know, establish a space station around the moon within the next ten years, no biggie. It will take around 6 to 8 billion dollars a year extra to reach this goal, compared to NASAS general budget of 20.6 billion.
@jake black I think you have an unrealistic grasp on humanities progress in the space age. This is no movie. Not everything is gonna be successful, we still barely know what we're doing. However, 20 billion dollars is literally NO money. Adjusting for inflation, the Apollo project would take 144 billion dollars today. No shit they cant do anything, they are being starved of funds. Look at how successful it was when they were backed with money, before their budget was dropped to nothing. They are the only organization to land a man on the moon. And it was done in only 1 decade! What you are stating is the equivalent of telling a student to write an essay with a broken pencil, in order for them to sharpen the pencil.
Competition can only take you so far, when it comes to research and space exploration, all of us need to work together and we will progress at an unreal speed
Well, the major things SpaceX got for themself is a system capable of landing safely used rocket with the help of AI and they didn't had to create guided rockets with computer as powerful as a calculator back then. Nasa focus more on science discovery than rocket engineering.
SeubGaming if they want to be funded then they need to do things that interest the people funding them though. They cant expect people to get excited for rocks and ice, or the content of co2 under a planets crust. They want to see results that look to push humanity forward. Im just saying they cant ask for a bigger budget without marketing effectively to the ones in charge.
the thing that were able to get anything as a species done at all is already amazing as fuck. sure, theoretically is could be better, but the fact that were able to coordinate millions of humans to work on common goal is already incredibly impressive.
@@speedymicroman5893 I consciously know my life at the moment. If we wake up in the future there's no experience that comes with it. I'd look back at the discoveries we've made and not think how great it is.
@@gun_ape ever heard of reincarnation? Yes? Well what about the theory that energy cannot be created nor destroyed? Yea? Ok good now let me explain the soul is energy when our body dies we just move on and we enter a new body and live again
My heart is filled when I think about the technology that is developed for space being in the devices I use everyday. Knowing that what I’m holding was intended for outer space somehow feels magical. It amazes me to no end the curiosity humans have and how far it can take them, and yet it saddens me deeply knowing I probably won’t be there to see it happen
I just want to show this video to anyone who thinks space exploration is wasted money. Thank you for spreading the knowledge around with this amazing video.
lmao think it SHOULD be obvious that space is the best place to expand too...… its the final frontier...… its the biggest gold mind..... why a bunch of people aren't TRYING to get onto this gold mind first... i don't know XD
I will put as much money in NASA when I grow up, I was enlightened by idea of NASA when I was 7 and, since then for four years I have been reading articles of NASA. I love it! Love your channel too, Aperture.
At least many other space agencies around the world are making huge gains when it comes to space discovery. Other nations and governments see the value in investing in such agencies and I truly hope the US rediscovers its passion for such things.
The US never lost that passion lol But you have to realize that the US cant afford everything in the world, including footing the world's military budget, giving the most aid to third world countries, and support its own citizens at the same time.
@@lordblazer "wasted" is just your subjective opinion. Learn history, economics, and politics first kid. I know its much easier to be an arm chair expert and decide how you think other people should spend their money, but imagine how you would feel if somebody you never met before decided that youre "affluent" and wants to dictate how you spend your money.
@@lordblazer I wouldn't say it's wasted. People always assume funding the military means funding death. The US military provides defense, healthcare, disaster relief, and much more to almost every country on earth. They provided aid to Haiti during it's deadly earthquake in 2013, to Japan in 2011 after a horrific tsunami, to Indonesia, and the list goes on. This doesn't even include the countless military hospitals and other facilities built around the world that are open to the public.
My company just submitted our first SBIR proposal to NASA. I'm extremely grateful for the public private partnership that allowed for that. People were skeptical that my team might not be ready... but the heat shield on the Apollo command module was completed by a few women in a warehouse. I for one am extremely grateful and excited to have the opportunity to be part of something so much bigger than one person, or one company.
A charming reply, if there ever was one. You've made a few logical leaps, though. Let me clear things up for you, even though this is all public record anyway... We submitted our proposals and preliminary research (43 pages of detailed planning focused on development of neuromorphic processing models in high earth orbit), as well as our funding request for $125,000. In that request, every single line item has to be fully accounted for, including salaries. My salary, as project leader, is set at minimum wage. That's about $7,000 for six months of work. As the lowest paid member of the research team, I don't think that "lining my pockets" is the right term. More importantly, though, is the fact that we've simply made the proposal... hoping to get our shot. My team is eagerly awaiting NASA's decision. Four years ago, I ran a vegetable farm. Now, because of SBIR grants, we have the chance to change the world. What's so wrong with that? What do you have to gain by making these kinds of assumptions, anyway?
Hobbyists, eh? Very kind of you to evaluate a team of 17 developers so brazenly. You're obviously upset here, but I really don't understand why... aside from maybe being incredibly bitter. I didn't do anything but say that I was grateful about having a chance to do something awesome. Whatever your life is like that makes you so hostile is your problem, not mine. Funding innovation, technology commercialization, and public private partnerships is exactly how we made it to the moon. Countless other inventions have come as a result of NASA's efforts and this funding. Did you... even watch the video? You're using the internet right now. Chances are, there's a Qualcomm chip in your phone, which were partly funded by SBIR grants with your (puts on tinfoil hat) STOLEN MONEY. Innovation is worth investing in, and the ROI data is incredibly abundant.
@All Things Everything ah, I see your edit now. You think $125k is all we go through in 6 months? You should learn to code if you think that's a lot of money, it could change your life! With so many devs on my team, that amount of cash doesn't cover the whole project. Also, it costs the same amount to run an F35 for 3 hours. 6 months of our team's work for the same cost? That's a bargain. Because I run a private company, my job is to mitigate risk to my employees and shareholders while growing our capabilities and revenues. We don't have the resources to spend on developing a cubesat implementation of our current technology without a NASA grant. So if we want to do that, and we really do, we apply for a grant like 650 other companies do every Spring. Does that concept just grind your gears or is it autonomous mapping in particular that's got you riled?
@@saultzwtheking1955 not at the moment, but we're growing fast right now so its hard to say what we'll be doing in a few months. Pm me a link to a resume if you want, I'm happy to take a look.
We humans are so obsessed with war and fighting for puny matters when we could have been exploring the cosmos in-depth and might actually have been closer to finding signs of extraterrestrial life than right now.
If NASA wasn't part of a corrupt system that wastes 3x more designing and building rockets then other private organizations. If SpaceX wasn't broke is the correct title. Politicians have power over the types of rockets that NASA builds, and they ask for designs that make us go backwards in technology.
I never clicked so fast. Its a common idea that if NASA had the same as the military budget. We would have colonised half the solar system by now. would like to know if that’s accurate
If you had a say in where money went, where would you put it? 🚀
A quick thanks to Audible for sponsoring this video. Go to www.audible.com/aperture or text 'aperture' to 500 500 to get one free audiobook, 2 free Audible originals and a 30-day free trial.
NASA and Space X.
Nasa and spacex
What would happen if NASA and SpaceX had merged?
into the poor people instead in of these things... from when i was 10 i already said they will never reach space. Now 30 years later and still i say the same. How many people could be helped in those 30 years. Glad i am not so naive to believe this shit.... And i never will.
Do you ever think if they can live on Mars they would take you there????? hahaha
No way... they will create a world where they could dictate but that is never gonna happen so let them do these things.... Truth will follow as always. Just be patience enough.
In my bank account
Titan: *has oil*
America: *boosts NASA's budget*
Technically methane,but same concept xD.
Only problem is, they would probably burn it here on Earth...
(if they could get it back)
@@mr.boomguy it the biggest gast station in our solar system
@@paranoid9678 I know. That's what NASA would do, but I doubt with the goverment...
New oil production technologies revolutionize oil production and turn the US from an oil importer to an oil exporter. 99% of the country - thinks that we want other countries oil.
@@colincampbell767 USA already exports a shitton of oil now with our fracking and reserves in Alaska
It warms my heart to see more and more people advocating for a healthy world, and space exploration.
How am I the First Comment?
SM_ GAMING ikr what the hell?
What kind of sorcery is this?
Indeed
Us regularl folks are the war mongering rich asses that run the world though... lol i think there will always be more good people than bad, possibly to good peoples avail.. because you dont need alot of bad people, to control alot of good folk.
The sad thing is that 90% of he people who are watching this video, have already a positive view on space science
hit the nail on the head there unfortunately
Hendrik M. Wdym
It's the same problem with all research, all around the world. Most people are so far away from anything regarding to science & economics they won't understand the value it brings to all of us, because it doesn't benefit them directly right now. LHC is prime example.
Whats wrong with positive view?
@@Blueflag04 The sad thing is, few gets to chance their minds, because we're like-minded.
This is why this video needs to be shared.
LOL, just tell them there's oil on the moon and we'll have warp drive by next month.
Lol
Lom
Loh
Lon
Loñ
NASA just needs to open up a premium snap problem solved
Vat underrated comment
Vat LMFAOOOO
Lol
Maybe a patreon too
aight lemme see dat curvature
They should just start a patreon, problem solved
That's why Space X is here
[NSFW] Apollo 11 (cougar) bare steel pics
Then why do we even pay taxes, come on!
Lol
@@newhorizon3229 for military and other governmental things, i see it that the gov doesnt see space exploration as a priority with everything going on around the world. thats why spacex and private companies exist
Why dont nasa start a subscription model, 10 usd a month
At a loss, 10 dollars you know, are you nuts
@@Soraviel did u not watch the fucking video you are watching 😂😂
They already have one. Our taxes, dumbass
@@TheUncertainKill Americans give NASA 10 USD a month?
Imagine NASA using patreon; "donate 1 dollar for every rocket launch". It work for UA-camrs :D
if people call Nasa a waste of tax, then question about their tax spent on military budget and meaningless wars in the middle east first
We NEED wars. They make the banksters richer.
iran kinda had to be dealt with due to the british tanker shit
Ive often wondered the same thing. People think the military is "protecting" them? say what? America is in a unique position geographically that pretty much makes a land invasion impossible as we could see it coming from weeks away. TBH the military should go back to its actual job of defending the United States, not policing the world, and give 75% of its budget to NASA.
@@fakiirification 75%? that is way to much 5% to 10% is all what they would need thats 200bil to 400bil thats plenty
There both wastes.
North Korea: * Starts space program *
America: * Boosts NASA funding *
*Also North Korea: We nuke you! WE NUKE YOU SO HARD!
Ricky Dawn
That’s what she said
Chinese company: **creates 5G before USA**
America: ***BAN HAMMER INTENSIFIES***
@@Adrianlovesmusic
Also Chinese: We developed 5G but you can't still watch UA-cam because we're still communist lolololololol
replace north korea with china
Il NASA had the army's budget, star Trek would be a documentary by now
Unfortunately we love to blow eachother up, which means we need to focus on safety. But that’s just humans I guess
I doubt it, they need smart people who can invent revolutionary new things. More money isn't going to create genius minds.
@@anthonymendoza6210 I'm sure there's a lot genius minds with brilliant idea but don't have the budget to carry it out
@@metalfusion1319 people just aren't thinking clearly. We could be blowing each other up _in space!_
The budget for the army is needed.
if NASA started a GoFundMe, then we would colonize Mars in just 2 years
nope!
They dont need GoFundMe. USA should drastically cut military budget. Russia has great army with budget of "just" 70 billion. USA has budget of 680 billion for military. that is crazy money waste.
@@josecolon2185 Shut up boomer
@@schoidz5066 lol
@@josecolon2185 lol
If NASA wasn't broke, I wouldn't have to write an essay about it.
@God Bless America *their.
@@talentlesscommentermdxxvii9419 grammar nazi ahaha
God Bless America NASA saved SpaceX. SpaceX exists because of NASA
@God Bless America actually, SpaceX has a much smaller budget than NASA..
@God Bless America yup, and I'm glad they're doing this! I wonder what they could do with the militaries budget..
America: boosts NASA funding
Moon: Ah -- here we go again
Us:Funding NASA
NASA:Wait what?
Artmemis programm _intensifies_
Moon:Oh shiet here we go again.
NASA: reputation+
Waste
@@FliBaleon Youre probably more a waste than anyone will . Youre not looking in the bigger spectrum for humanity .
Are you afraid to say shit.
@@lightyagami1058 sometimes when you swear on comments it doesn't let you post it. Like the words r e t * r d and fa&&ot
Every scientist ever: pls we need funding help
USA: gun
g u n
Natasha Watkins g. U. N
Travis Scott: belt
G U N
ｇｇｇｇｇｇｇｇｇｇｇｕｕｕｕｕｕｕｕｎｎｎｎｎｎｎｎｎｎｎ
Its funny how this was released a few days before NASA announced returning to the moon and having people stay for longer periods of time by 2024. I hope they actually give us some kind of second space race to mars against SpaceX or even better if they somehow merge into one.
going to the moon and staying is actually one of the biggest steps for going to mars, as a start from the moon might not sound very useful, but it is, it makes it easier to escape the gravitational pull of the earth, thus wasting less fuel going for mars
@@heltrom716 that's from kurgeszat but still liked your reply.
Sorry if I am wrong, but doesn't NASA depends on SpaceX for rockets like how they did with shuttle?
@@NoName-wl5uo Its "common" knowledge. Kurg didnt dream up the concept all by himself, he just uses his platform to teach those who may not know.
@asaeampan ty
Sounds like NASA needs to start a Gofundme Account.
Fuck yea
@@_lod If you like this logic of a GoFundMe Account, (I do) why not have the gobernment do that too?
@@_lod yeah, voluntary supporting gobernment would indeed be weird. seems legit if it isn't even legal, right?
I'd donate.
No, they need to start an onlyfans
I bet most of the time engineers spend at NASA is finding out ways to make their projects cheaper rather than actually coming up with new ideas, that would be kinda sad :/
Welcome to 'doing any kind of research 101'
BadUploadScheduleツ I love you profile picture
They do. I work at the cape. Most time has been spent retrofitting the old buildings to digital and swapping cables to fiber optics
Making cheaper rockets is the same thing as coming up with new ideas. It's like when you play ksp in career mode rather than sandbox, you would make more efficient, cheap rockets that get you farther than the less efficient rockets.
Probably not, given that launch costs the most money.
NASA: Can we have more government funding?
America: I don't know, CAN YOU?
nasa: please we need money for the betterment of humanity
america: what's that i hear? i think it's a whiny bitch!
nasa: ...
Omnical
Government: _ThE bEtTeRmEnT oF oUr CoUnTrY_
We owe Nasa a HUGE dept. They gave us so much, but we give them so little in return.
*okay boomer.*
Absolute GamerT Can’t even use memes right
Absolute GamerT shut the fuck up bastard
Mr. Boomguy what have they gave us
Super Drip just look it up, read some books about, there’s so much, a lot of it so complicated, that it’d be too much for me to type out, but it’s out there, and it’s revolutionary. Research it yourself.
I would LOVE to see NASA's budget tripled to nearly $60 Billion. $20 billion to maintain its current projects including the ISS, $20 Billion for Gateway and Moon missions(Constructing permanent bases), and $20 billion for Mars and Beyond.
I would prefer to see NASA begin to consistently bring in programs on time and on budget. Remember that a lot of space exploration was cancelled to pay for the cost over-runs on the JWST.
And a true commitment from NASA to go to the moon by 2025 would help. It's hard to grab peoples imaginations with: "We'll go to Mars in the late 2030's - maybe."
Colin Campbell Yes. One of the main reasons we were able to build the technology from the ground up, land people on the moon, and send them home safely was because of time constraints.
@@colincampbell767Cost overruns and delays would be solved with an increased budget. Limited budgets mean NASA can't properly fund projects, which means delays in work. And delays in work mean more money spent.
Nasa should open something like "you donate... we show you how we work" I would easily pay 25-50$ monthly just to see what they're doing and working on.
same
That's actually a phenomenal idea! Would for sure invest in that.
onlyfans
@@raditiyavalendeto4112 onlyfans for rocket ships and telescopes that is
I’d pay for that
imagine how much we could accomplish if we weren't trying to kill each other all the time
Kill all the clouds 𝓪𝓱𝓮𝓶 username
@Mustache Merlin Maybe, but the argument can be made that war was only the catalyst to growthe and not the reason.
@@Th3Espr3ss0 war will never go away, its been happening since the beginning of time for us
who's trying to kill each other all the time? you people look pathetic with your virtue signaling and supposed better plan for humans, absolutely clueless and naive.
Ironically we aren't really trying to kill each other that much anymore. We live in the most peaceful times in the whole human history but at the same time we invest most money in military. Is the peace maintained by the military spending or we could just remove 50% of that and give it to NASA. Probably no one knows what is the right answer. All I know that space agencies need more funding and public perception must be changed to support space exploration. If people are sold on this, the money will start to come naturally.
It is sad that our world is ruled by a piece of paper
It's because of jobs. If people didn't have to work money wouldn't be a problem. However you can't live off the backs of others. Hence why we have money. Money motivates people to do jobs. If you want to sit at home with WiFi someone has to work at the wifi place in case it malfunctions. But why can't they be at home too like you?. Money wouldn't be a problem if we had robots though. If robots did our jobs then we could all quit our jobs and money wouldn't be an issue. The world would continue to work the same way but instead of humans working we'd all be home chilling. Make NASA build robots
@@havokgaming9670 This is a very brilliant, and enlightened way of looking at this problem.
@@havokgaming9670 dam
@@havokgaming9670 robloxs.
damn
@@aerookz Always the Roblox
USA: Drops funding for NASA
NASA: There is oil and unclaimed land on the moon
News: NASA budget jumps to 10 trillion
Edit 1:
Milion hraje: I guess you know that for oil you need life forms before millions of years... ;)
*manifest destiny 2: Electric boogaloo*
USA after colonising the Moon: drops funding again.
NASA: y'know, there are communists on Mars. They call it the red planet for a reason.
*NASA budget jumps to 20 trillion*
Facts.
hahah
@@CassidyCope Gold
who is the CEO of money and why aren't they sponsoring NASA...
Yes I know it doesnt work like that
@M3Talic forgot to put your name in the previous comment so I'll do it in this one so you get the notification
I had forgotten to make the letters switch between caps and lower case
I know that, ya know what, ima just fix my original comment
There, happy?
I came here thinking “16 minutes? I’ll just watch 2 or 3.”
16 minutes later I’m like “damn that was a quick 2 minutes.”
Nasa, can send a rocket to mars every 13 years,
if nasa and the us military switched budgets
Nasa could afford to send a rocket to mars every 2 weeks
@Habituated Abnormality 2 minutes
What y’all aren’t on Mars. I thought earth was the colony and everyone just left because it’s Blue and not Red
@cold war
mars dont have oil
And the military would be too scared to fight any more wars
Then Iran takes over us
#DONATE24 Let's donate $24 to Nasa in order to speed up human progress!!
oh boy how I wish non-americans could donate to NASA.
@@noobkilla3 To the best of my knowledge, you can donate to NASA, NASA just can't solicit them--added info below. However, you're better off donating to a political campaign that supports your opinion, as, like restaurants with waiters, tipping (donations) for an invaluable service could have detrimental affects on political discourse concerning NASA's public funding.
Make check out to: GIFTS and Donations Trust Fund
Include a memo noting the destination account number 80X8980.
Use the following address:
NASA Office of CFO Dir Fin. Mgmt NASA Shared Services Center Building 1111, Jerry Hlass Road Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
@@noobkilla3 Check if your country has a space program, they could be partnering with NASA.
I have 9 dollars
@@noobkilla3 this would be great
Nasa should become wordwide
Nasa could save 15% or more on car insurance by switching to Geico.
Preoccupiedude pfft 😂
XxMINQxX 61 they make 21.5 billion a year, that could be 27.95 billion by switching to Geico
Preoccupiedude 😂
Nasa should make a patreon lmao
Actually not a bad Idea
It's funny, but that _could_ work. I'm not US citizen but I'd love to donate to space programs... NASA has done a lot for everyone, I'd donate $10 each month even if I don't have a lot of money. Edit: I'd probably donate more depending on how things work and if other people jump in too.
@@MrFreakHeavy They would have to do it without anything being offered. There is a law that prevents them from getting into obligations other than what congress and the united states government gives them, and patreon might be considered to conflict with that.
Mods bisexual lol
@@izaicslinux6961 I thought there would conflicts like that. It doesn't have to patreon. I just suggest something that is easy to use. It can be an organization associated with NASA, have a donation/patreon website so that people can give money each month (or similar) and then at the end of each month (or period) the money will be donated to them. I think the problem is Accessibility. If people could just as easily donate money for them and in return they could, for example, share their advancements every so often, just as positive feedback so people feel encouraged and happy to provide (thinking that they are contributing and feeling empowered, "I'm actually doing good for the world") would be very cool and I'm sure they will get a lot of support.
But then, maybe very few people will help. Who knows. I just think that there may be a high possibility that things could end up helping them. I just hope donations like that won't affect their relationship with the government, making them think "you don't need tax money anymore with all those donations." Although that could be one hell of an achievement for humanity -- with the sheer power of altruism and goodwill humans could advance to a better future.
I have a dream...
Our inability to work together as a species will be our downfall. Look what we have done to our only place to live. Elon Musk appraised our future here on earth and didn't like what he saw. All of the products he makes are like the basics of what he will need on Mars. Electric transportation, tunneling, fuel processing, neuro-technology, expert systems, global internet, smart power storage and of course the jewel in his crown is equipment reusability. I really hope he is successful in achieving his goals.
IbnBahtuta Elon Musk is our god.
@@nikjoh06 in short he can chose to doom us into our own broken ozone layer or send us to mars and save us
Indeed.
You forgot boring company flamethrower
and he could mobilize tesla car building robots to use flamethrowers to kill us
The quality of these videos is beyond moon.
Commenting because I want more people like you to start expressing the importance of this and how we can help the Earth too. Thank you for being a great human...
Exactly! I constantly think about what earth would be like if we explored space more. Most likely a moon and/or a mars colony. Probably a Dyson swarm, giving us unforseen amount of energy, allowing potential deep space colonies, probably a quicker discovery of exotic matter, allowing us to bend space and time into wormhole, allowing cross galaxy movement. If we give more money to NASA we will end up with a galactic civilization. I care way to much about this.
@@coreywelsher2575 I 100% agree with you
What do you guys think is the best way to get technological advancement. Through the solving of an issue, like needing clean water and getting rid of sewage, you would need an aquifer and a sewer. Technologies that need to be developed based on the issue of these two things. Or do you guys think technological advancement would be more efficient for the sake of finding technology to (not immediately) benefit humanity, like building sewers and aquifers would be.
@@rickydawn6313 It's not as black and white as that I think. It's a hard problem to solve. I feel that its a matter of sustainability. No matter how we do it, it's a question of "will it last?" like how efficient is it? I hope this makes sense, I wrote this at 5AM lol
@Jake Watson Dude, who spit in your apple juice this morning...
Aperture: Talking calmly about how it may be time to return to the moon with nice music in the background
*Ad plays*
Ad: Mr Beast yelling at me about Honey
Idk why I found that so funny
If nasa used honey they'd probably be able to make their projects cheaper
Lol
@@beszebalint512 lol
@@beszebalint512 We filled all moon craters with honey and the last one to leave gets a billion dollars!😅
@@beszebalint512 🤣
Titan: *has oil*
US: *declares war on Titan*
Ok mr Arabic man
@@tmapaman7080 ok norse person
@@vincentdreemurr OK boomer
@@kris_2403 ok coomer
ok man
Good thing we have SpaceX kickstarting another space race. Go private money
@@jeremyalexander9761
Things change and now it's SpaceX that's doing all the important stuff, not the Government or Nasa.
It's not private if we know about it
@@GreatGooglieWooglie dude. LOL. I hope you're trolling. He means private money as in not public funded (taxes, government)
lmfao “not private if we know about it”
@@Max_Le_Groom SpaceX does carrying payload NASA still builds the brains aka all the invaluable instrumentation that actually gives us data
All big science and space content creators should start a NASA budget increase public request.
Make people actively show their interest in space again.
Make their congress representatives realize space is still interesting for the average citizen.
We need to go back.
You're not wrong, but pro-science campaigns are already prevalent. The problem is that anti-science interests are responding with growing followings. What you're proposing has been shown to be more difficult than we expected
yeah that's not gonna happen
@@perpetualsystems Sadly.
@@SpainSpace The problem with anti-science is that most of 95% of thems are flat earthers,
and very sadly............flat earthers cannot believe anything others than just theirs insanity
@Private Time Cool :)
FFS Humanity!
Going backwards since 1969.
Haha funny ha
@An Average Guy this happens every 4 years....
quit blaming all of humanity instead blame america for having such an inflated military budget and for not using it on something more useful
@@perniciousseizurehellio3438 true
@@perniciousseizurehellio3438 somewhere.....far away.......a muslim child isnt being bombed. What is more important? Honestly.
NASA: ao when we will start the mars colonzing prjoect
USA Govermemt: um no we no have much money right now maybe later
NASA: there is oil on mars and we heard russia is going there by next year
USA goverment: get the mars rocket and supplies ready by the next 2 months and we are going to mars right now
That was probably the best video you've done. Great job 👏👏👏
@Munky Bidness appropriate warnings are justified.
@Munky Bidness where? example please.
@Munky Bidness again timestamp because I heard NO fearmongering. Just FACTS .
@Munky Bidness ignorance on your part
@Munky Bidness then dont make claims if you ''cant be fucked'' to gather evidence to support your claim.
Best video you've made information wise. People have no idea how much NASA gets the shaft in comparison to the rest of the government. They need 10X the funding they're getting.
Many states still teach creationism, reject climate change and vaccines, and are banning abortions left and right because of religious reasons.
You think legislators and representatives of said states are gonna prioritize funding NASA?
Elerie I ducking wish this religious nonsense ends. It’s slowing us as a species down way too hard.
56 million per day.... for decades of delay and cancelation? Any person not getting triggered from this is a person I need to pray for. So sad really sad a huge percentage of the military budget goes to space and Nasa.
What a bunch of hogwash.
And I once dreamed of being an astronaut and studying space science for years. Now after seeing how it really works I'd wager a huge share of the 56 mil. per day budget goes to marketing and promotion and they have the help of the masses not only from the taxes but most people believe Nasa that means every author teacher .... When all people believe in you and your tricking them who cares if they give you money? You're gonna take it anyway....
@@stonecat676 Reject climate change? No, they reject the marxist lie that climate change is made by man. And instead embrace reality that the climate has been changing for a billion years sometimes more sometimes less than now. And until you have an accurate measurement of CO2 levels from every decade going back to atleast the last million years, STFU.
@@DesertStateInEU Nah, mate. Jesus told me climate change was real.
We're DEFINITELY in the wrong timeline.
Parker Gonzaga yep
We need doctor strange
@@kiddostyleyt dormamu ive come to bargain
Yeah, we are in what I like to call the stupid timeline.
NASA: we could’ve been to mars by now if you weren’t so stingy...
U.S. Military: hmm? Couldn’t hear you over the 3 new aircraft carriers I bought.
NASA: YOU WHAT?
If we'er going to give a huge chunk of money to Boeing and Lockheed, etc. every year, then we may as well have it be for spacecraft instead of fighter and bomber aircraft. Seriously, more money is spent on the F-22 per year than on NASA.
True, we don’t have to be prepping the military like WWlll is going to break out tomorrow, hopefully it never will. While we’re at it maybe give some money to education, medical advancements, making debt go down rather than up.
@@jamiewhichelo9983 holy shit
@@matthewmurdock6187 um....
About that WWlll comment, that didn’t age too well...
if nasa wasn't broke...
They would have airpods
great name for floating space pods
If NASA wasnt broke they probably would of invented proper virtual reality just like from anime.
To be fair, broke people buy apple airpods
Dante's Inferno Yeah, I’m definitely broke. Otherwise, I would have a vertu phone made of jewels and diamond.
May god bless me.
New Apollo pro 2020
If NASA had 1 trillion dollars anually
I would be typing from the moon
We'd have to cut a lot of things
@@samanthastellan6441 You guys have too much founding for the military tho...
Even the military doesn't have 1 trillion. We need more population for more income
I'd be playing TF2 on neptune
@@karhammer without the US military budget we're furked
This video was extremely well done, very cinematic and gets your brain really thinking about the possibilities. Great job! :)
If NASA has proper funding
Then we’d already be a type 3 civilization by now
Edit: Wow many of the replies can be wooshed
I doubt we'd be making Dyson Spheres...
dawg we’re not even a type 1 civilization yet
No child you should be realistic
We as humans are shit well die before that happens
Unless a Type 3 civilization comes and share their ideas with us, we doom to rot on Earth forever
@@MarloSoBalJr highly unlikely nigga shit dont work like that were too insignificant to even make contact with were probably ajoke to them
🤷🏽♂️ let's be honest if America spent money correctly we'd probably be the most advanced country in the world
.. that'll never happen though.
If by correctly mean to put more budget to nasa and reduce from military. It would be the most shit ass country it the world becuz many country always wanna clip america ass and turn it to dust. U seem it as peace, only becuz the military is there so they wouldnt make a move. Without ur military budget. Many country on the entire world find a way and hatch a plan to destroy america.
@@realdeal5712 That's ridiculous. If we cut the military budget in HALF we would still have the most powerful military in the world and if we gave that half to nasa, we would without question be the most Infrastructurally and Technologically advanced country in the world without question. Do you realize that a lot of the newest and most advanced military technologies originate from space related research? In this way we can have our cake and eat it too. It's honestly so simple.
@@A____G the problem is too many countries want to end the USA and cutting it in half would still make it the largest in the world but that would make it les than many enemies combined like Russia and China but with the current one no. However it is a bit too high there should be small cutbacks to help NASA
Gabriel Lins and why is that they want to destroy us in the first place? It’s because we put our noses in other country’s personal business where they don’t belong. And even then, the country that has the other half of the 93% of nukes owned by two countries (Aka, Russia) is on okay terms with us after we both decided that blowing up the entire world to get rid of each other is probably not a good idea. Maybe if we acted like a more polite country and minded our own business, instead of starting wars in the Middle East for oil and ‘freedom’, maybe we wouldn’t be targeted by literally every country on the planet.
@@apollyonnoctis1291 exactly
Video Ideas:
- what would a treaty with all space agencies look like (NASA, CSA, JAXA) etc...
- Is WW3 Inevitable
@kotonpap that’s acc a great title
- what if the Soviet space program was resurrected?!
WW3 will never happen.
Josue Cruz are you sure about that?¿
@@josiebiddle9886 this is not the 20th century. The world is too interconnected right now for a world war.
I really hope we can return to the Moon in 2024. And go to Mars shortly after.
ua-cam.com/video/vl6jn-DdafM/v-deo.html
I think your wish might come true.
You can't return somewhere you've never been. Rockets do not work in a vacuum as the medium by which they Propel themselves is simply not present. Use your brain for once in your life and investigate what you were taught and told to find out if it's actually true.
@@ExploreYourWorld-oo3jd That's pretty ironic, considering the fact that you have access to the information required to actually understand nearly anything you want.
@@ExploreYourWorld-oo3jd Except rockets do work in a vacuum bc the oxygen, fuel and ignition for propulsion is provided by the rocket itself
im from the future and there might be some hope for that
Budget to destroy: ~600 BILLION
Budget to find our new home and create: Less than 0,1 of dat 600 billion
Humans love to destroy, ask any like minded Historian.
Kaledrone /\ because when two groups try to destroy each other using various technologies, believe it or not, they actually innovate that technology to one up the other group. Hence this is the reason that when wars happen and we try destroy others that we tend to have the most technological advancements in the shortest period of time. I reference the 2 world wars and the Cold War as perfect examples.
If you want word peace then disarmament and societies ruled by women is what you should seek. If you want technological advancement then competition and societies dominated by men is what you should seek.
Simple as that mate. Humans are humans and they want to one up each other and acquire more than just their basic needs. It’s what sets us apart from animals.
@@nosamsemaj9150 unfortunately yes technological advancement happens most during wars. And then during peace the advancement is then stagnated
Actually it's not 600 billion. Around 150-200 bils goes away as a foreign aid to Israel, Egypt, North Korea, Marroco, Mexico and other countries. You would be shocked how much money and military hardware flows to them. Then again, don't tell anyone, or else you get to be called nazi / islamophobe.
@@nosamsemaj9150 Okay, I read another of your comments in another thread and I don't get what your problem with women is. I'm a man but I don't think that women can't lead or can't be as good as men in certain jobs. Of course there are difference and men and women will both be different at different things but something gives me the impression that you just think women are weak and unfit to be leaders. Correct me if I am wrong.
I love how the government is spending more developing technology to fight each other instead of working on extending the human race
why do you love that ?
@@driftinabmw sarcasm bruh
What else drives innovation? Nearly all technology can be traced back to engineering more effective ways to kill enemies, including the nasa program.
@@patrickhouston3882 Uh...did you even watch the video? He literally said NASA was founded because the U.S got jealous USSR sent a fucking ball into space. The whole space race was started to prove the U.S has a bigger wee wee.
who's fighting each other? you people look pathetic with your virtue signaling and supposed better plan for humans, absolutely clueless and naive.
I love your videos so much! Keep it up!
You keep it up!
Yay a new hidden gem channel. I’ve got a lot of content to binge now😂
Yeah, its insanely hard to find hidden gems on UA-cam. If only recommendations didn't send me content I already know of but instead, content I wouldn't know of.
Like when I binge a hidden gem for while, and then those videos are the only thing I see in my recommended for a while. I like some of the videos not all, so stop sending fricken fortnite videos.
nasa if we weren't so broke:
have you heard of kerbal space program
Apoapsis Periapsis They probably use KSP to test the SLS
@@pikapolar3966 no, first ksp is a ILLUSTRATION of the difficulty of getting to space. Ksp is scaled down 8 times to make it easier.
randomguy379 weird, I don't remember commenting that?
@@pikapolar3966 you talking about testing sls using ksp. The delta v needed for kerbin orbit is ~3500m/s delta v. Earth orbit is 28,000k/s. A kilometer of delta v is 1000m/s.
im transferring to a new university and im caught between aerospace engineering and optical physics. you just made my mind up for me.
Aerospace engineering ain't no joke, had a friend who did it and he looked stressed 25/8 lmao.
Good luck and wish you all the best :)
I just graduated highschool, I know the generation we're in is the one who's going to be in the midst of a new era of space exploration and I'm excited to see it.
Optical physics right? Cause NASA ain't got no funding for you lol
@@RunnerETRC you mean a new era of CGI propaganda right? Rockets do not work in a vacuum. Why? the means by which they Propel themselves (with thrust) is not possible in a vacuum. Why? because the medium by which the thrust pushes off of (atmospheric pressure) is not present. You believe that you have been educated when in reality you have merely been indoctrinated. There is truth and then there is belief. you may think you know the truth right now, but in reality all you have is belief. Why? Your education was an indoctrination into a belief system. Much of this so-called 'science' that you take as fact and you believe in.. is not empirical, testable, repeatable or observable by multiple independent parties all achieving the same result. It's all pseudoscience.
So here's the big question... are you going to remain a sheep and regurgitate what you think you know? what you were taught and told? or ....will you choose to become the lion? and fearlessly investigate for yourself regardless of where the investigation may lead? The choice is yours.
@@ExploreYourWorld-oo3jd pls be a joke.
NASA have announced they are going back to the moon "to stay" in 2024
yeeeehaahh we go to the moon
NASA in 2024: Artemis pushed back 5 years. 2029 Artemis pushed back 8 years.
If they just put the sls budget into space x they would probably already be there. NASA needs more money but they also need to do better at their spending.
I just watched the 1969 documentary that claimed the same thing about 1999. When are you sheep going to wake up to this deception??
@@ExploreYourWorld-oo3jd what's your problem, non believers like you always rant on the internet can't you just do something else and what's the point of you watching this video if you're the "know it all" and stop us from this deception video you could've spent your "All knowing" mind to solve deforestation and climate change
"To stay" just means we will maintain some form of permanent presence. The Gateway counts, even if it doesn't always have people there.
Instructions unclear: Refounded Soviet Union
*Life Of Boris wants to know your location*
Good job my komrad.
Wonderful! Lets have another space race.
Space race = Bigger budget for both sides = More space
People in general have a narrow view of the universe .. if more were educated about the wonders of our universe more discoveries would be made, like mining asteroids, a lot of money there waiting to be made.
We are so far behind in space technology, we need more funding.
TX 1600 exactly why I’m going to MIT next year to study astrophysics
TKS_Adem that’s great, we need more people to become more educated with the universe and how it works. All the best have fun, because it will be an amazing experience.
As of right now that is all a fairy tail. Nothing even close to this has happened. We are no closer to accomplishing these feats then we where 50 years ago.
TKS_Adem good for you!
In every strategy game i played before i gather lots of resources and become super rich i make sure my defense is all set or other players will plunder my resources and invade me or my allies. Terrorists are real.
If NASA wasn't broke we'd be fighting belters over the protomolicul, and don't get me wrong I'm totally in!!
Same dude
Oye Sabaka! Don't insult my beltalowda!
@@nilau8463 Sasa KE!
Mars shall prevail!
Imagine if NASA have 50% of us military budget
AyyMD They would get taken over and then the world would be ruined
@@crabosity bro USA would still double second place China in military funding hardly
mars would be green
@@matthewg5908 China doesn't have military personnel and bases in most of the countries in the world. China isn't a world power. The USA is.
Bruh
Nixon began the defunding because he didn't like JFK. I've been watching this process continue for 50 yrs.
It wasn't Nixon, NASA started to roll up at the same time all federal agencies were forced to fulfill diversity quotas. Read "whitey on the moon" for what kind of thinking led to today.
Politicians are fucking stupid. We need scientists, teachers, doctors, mathematicians, etc. to run the government.
@@stonecat676 Except sadly they will never get into politics..They have Research...which is much better
Bogdan Bogdanoff Good Lord. Are you seriously blaming racial equality for the lack of NASA funding? That is one of the most idiotic things I’ve heard in a while.
And revamped thanks to trump
NASA: We don't have enough money to go to the moon
Space X: Hold my beer
Sheikh Tall SpaceX are mostly funded by NASA.
@@LukaTomato ... by selling things to NASA.
You kinda need to actually consider this one a little more closely, because spacex runs for profit by giving people a service, a service that is mainly required by groups like, yup, NASA. it's really not funding in that sense.
@@LukaTomato NASA provided the seed money out of desperation - they were looking at the Space Shuttle retiring and had nothing that they could replace it with for at least another decade.
However - SpaceX is making money by providing services to their customers. NASA is merely one of those customers. NASA needs to get out of the earth-to-orbit business entirely - the SLS is already obsolete. In fact - NASA should focus solely on payloads and contract out the getting those payloads to their destination.
@@colincampbell767 Actually you'll find that most of their money still does come from NASA, and the military. Your average commercial payload contract is nowhere near enough to sustain and grow a company like SpaceX. Also NASA aren't building SLS, Boeing and a few others are. Oh, and SLS? Obsolete? LOL
@@LukaTomato Looking at the SpaceX launch manifest it appears than only about 1/3rd of SpaceX launches are NASA and the US military.
And yes, the SLS is obsolete. At $1 billion (not counting the payload) per mission the money can be far better spent on payloads and simply hire somebody to get them into orbit. $1 billion would only make sense if the spacecraft were reusable. We don't even have anything resembling a firm launch date for it's first mission. The taxpayer would be better off shutting down the SLS and invest the money into modular and reusable spaceship components that can be assembled in orbit. And simply pay somebody to get them there.
me: NASA TAKE MY MONEY!
nasa: ight lets get to the moon bruh
edit: where can i donate to nasa?
Paradox Sorrz we about to kickstart a nasa mars mission 😂😂
I was just wondering this
you can't directly donate but you can buy stuff from the merch store
You can always pay more taxes if you want.
@@MrDuck-oi3qc People don't want to pay tax for something dumb like military or wall. MANY people gladly pay few bucks extra tax for space and technology.
Yup we owe a lot from NASA. Not just the US but every country in the world. People should realize that.
But we can thank the Russians for launching the first satellite XD
@@bluehornet197 Yup I agree. I hope governments would add more funds for space exploration.
For what? Please inform me what NASA has done to impact us other than emotionally? What they talk about doesn't effect our daily lives here... on earth. They can talk about black holes and other galaxies but dude...it's all fantasy. Entertainment at best.
@@DonnyRay so galaxies and black holes that have proven to be real are just fictions of fantasy 😂😂😂😂
@@DonnyRay dude ur actually typing from one of the nasa innovation or technological improvements
This channel makes me feel so good. Thanks for being so optimistic and being so accurate with what you tell us in your videos, Aperture!
NASA: Can u give me some more money pls?
America: No, i dont think i will
accurate
ahah really funny man
ahah really funny man
Maybe if NASA could consistently bring programs in on schedule and on budget Congress would be more willing to give them more money.
Colin Campbell The reason why their projects are not on time is because they don’t have enough money raising the budget would do so much for humanity
This needs more attention. Nasa needs more funding. Period.
20 billion dollars a year in funding isn't enough?
@@bluehornet197 have you even watched the video?
@@deltainfinium869 yes I did and I think 20 billion a year is a good investment because not even cancer research gets 20 billion in a year and we spend more on space programs then we do finding a cure for cancer
James Quinn The thing is a cure for cancer is entirely different then space exploration. The video literally says we have the capability to sustain ourselves on the Moon, we don’t even need half the budget of the military to do so. By your logic, we should halt all funding that isn’t deemed as “important” as cancer research.
For all the "NASA should start a Patreon" jokes... you are absolutely correct. In fact, all government programs should follow a system of voluntary funding. That way you are the one who decides where you money goes, and not some self-serving bureaucrat.
Its a pretty good idea. This way the dumb tax payer would realise how important their tax is
Actually, the tax payer would realise how dumb and unimportant some of the government programs are.
Me: sits down to finally get some study done
Aperture: uploads new video
Me: ......
Desire
You: Brings out the paper shredder
Reason: Priorities.
too real i got my finals in a week, good luck on your test!
:0
Relatable
Totally me right now!!!😅😅😅
3:06
NASA: launching pushing a space mission back to 2020
2020: aight imma end this hol mans career
It would take less than 5% of the defense budget to double NASAs budget.
@jake black well they currently have a plan in place called ARTEMIS that will, you know, establish a space station around the moon within the next ten years, no biggie. It will take around 6 to 8 billion dollars a year extra to reach this goal, compared to NASAS general budget of 20.6 billion.
@jake black the Artemis program is already going through Congress and NASA has already partnered up with 14 other private companies.
@jake black "it will be the same until Reforms are made"! Opposes budget reform. You realize that NASA is run by different people now right
@jake black I think you have an unrealistic grasp on humanities progress in the space age. This is no movie. Not everything is gonna be successful, we still barely know what we're doing. However, 20 billion dollars is literally NO money. Adjusting for inflation, the Apollo project would take 144 billion dollars today. No shit they cant do anything, they are being starved of funds. Look at how successful it was when they were backed with money, before their budget was dropped to nothing. They are the only organization to land a man on the moon. And it was done in only 1 decade! What you are stating is the equivalent of telling a student to write an essay with a broken pencil, in order for them to sharpen the pencil.
jake black NASA is focused on research while SpaceX is more focused on rocket technology
Your videos keep gettn better ❤️love from Denmark 🇩🇰
Denmark isn’t real an I have a hoodie to prove it
*Let's donate to NASA!*
Hell no. Persuade the government to shift funding.
lol watch NASA open up a gofundme
@@fish_activity I would rather support that than Star Citizen
@The Exoplanets Channel
You first !
@@Purriah Yeah, only voting correctly will do that... Well, might...
I always find myself getting stoned out of my mind and watching this stuff and learning more than I did in school.
Competition can only take you so far, when it comes to research and space exploration, all of us need to work together and we will progress at an unreal speed
a video from nasa came out about this and the timing was amazing haha
You're right 😂😂
@OmniscientEnigmaRip official nasa's
This is probably one of the best, and most important vidoes you have done so far! Thanks for making these videos!
Maybe there will be a President who will campaign for an increase for the NASA budget
Maybe we had one lined up, but $hillary stole the Primary from him
Trump has been trying to raise it
@@NonDelusional74611 Ha Ha! You referring to looney Bernie. LOL
neither of these candidates have ever been president
How has spacex done so much with a fraction of nasas budget?
Well, the major things SpaceX got for themself is a system capable of landing safely used rocket with the help of AI and they didn't had to create guided rockets with computer as powerful as a calculator back then. Nasa focus more on science discovery than rocket engineering.
SeubGaming if they want to be funded then they need to do things that interest the people funding them though. They cant expect people to get excited for rocks and ice, or the content of co2 under a planets crust. They want to see results that look to push humanity forward. Im just saying they cant ask for a bigger budget without marketing effectively to the ones in charge.
@@LatelyDrowsy lol rocks or ice the things that allow you to exist
Buddhist Duck yea ofc, but some people don’t get the importance
@@LatelyDrowsy yep
Imagine what 7 Billion people could achieve if we all worked together...
the thing that were able to get anything as a species done at all is already amazing as fuck.
sure, theoretically is could be better, but the fact that were able to coordinate millions of humans to work on common goal is already incredibly impressive.
Religion divides us all.
@@ChannelSatim Not all religions divide people.
Andrew Mikhail ........
7 billion people will never ever ever work together, mark my words lol.
I fear dying only because I dont want to miss out on history in the making. If we discover life out there, I want to be around to see it.
What about the life after death are you not gonna miss anything on that ?
@@speedymicroman5893 I consciously know my life at the moment. If we wake up in the future there's no experience that comes with it. I'd look back at the discoveries we've made and not think how great it is.
@@gun_ape How can you assume that there will be no experience even though we will wake up ? You really think this short stupid life is just it ? xD
@@gun_ape ever heard of reincarnation? Yes? Well what about the theory that energy cannot be created nor destroyed? Yea? Ok good now let me explain the soul is energy when our body dies we just move on and we enter a new body and live again
smh why don't they just open a patreon
My heart is filled when I think about the technology that is developed for space being in the devices I use everyday. Knowing that what I’m holding was intended for outer space somehow feels magical. It amazes me to no end the curiosity humans have and how far it can take them, and yet it saddens me deeply knowing I probably won’t be there to see it happen
I just want to show this video to anyone who thinks space exploration is wasted money.
Thank you for spreading the knowledge around with this amazing video.
lmao think it SHOULD be obvious that space is the best place to expand too...… its the final frontier...… its the biggest gold mind..... why a bunch of people aren't TRYING to get onto this gold mind first... i don't know XD
ok......
Where do you get all that amazing footage from?
He records it himself, duuh. Haven't you seen the real black hole image ? That's his work, he just kept a better version to himself
Probably some stock footage service. One shot is from my hometown in Switzerland.
I will put as much money in NASA when I grow up, I was enlightened by idea of NASA when I was 7 and, since then for four years I have been reading articles of NASA. I love it! Love your channel too, Aperture.
Your videos are just insanely aesthetic
At least many other space agencies around the world are making huge gains when it comes to space discovery. Other nations and governments see the value in investing in such agencies and I truly hope the US rediscovers its passion for such things.
The US never lost that passion lol But you have to realize that the US cant afford everything in the world, including footing the world's military budget, giving the most aid to third world countries, and support its own citizens at the same time.
@@DesertStateInEU you seriously don't know how affluent the US is and how much is wasted on the military.
@@lordblazer "wasted" is just your subjective opinion. Learn history, economics, and politics first kid. I know its much easier to be an arm chair expert and decide how you think other people should spend their money, but imagine how you would feel if somebody you never met before decided that youre "affluent" and wants to dictate how you spend your money.
@@lordblazer I wouldn't say it's wasted. People always assume funding the military means funding death. The US military provides defense, healthcare, disaster relief, and much more to almost every country on earth. They provided aid to Haiti during it's deadly earthquake in 2013, to Japan in 2011 after a horrific tsunami, to Indonesia, and the list goes on. This doesn't even include the countless military hospitals and other facilities built around the world that are open to the public.
dogfish North Korea
NASA and the environment are the greatest missed opportunities in the human races advancement.
ThisisRubbishlo no they’re not.
no sam semaj yes they are
@@nosamsemaj9150 yes they are.
@@dantheman2415 why?
@@nosamsemaj9150 why not
The entire office: we aint broke, america be bitchin on science
Wow. This video is AMAZING! Keep up the content man
My company just submitted our first SBIR proposal to NASA. I'm extremely grateful for the public private partnership that allowed for that.
People were skeptical that my team might not be ready... but the heat shield on the Apollo command module was completed by a few women in a warehouse.
I for one am extremely grateful and excited to have the opportunity to be part of something so much bigger than one person, or one company.
A charming reply, if there ever was one. You've made a few logical leaps, though. Let me clear things up for you, even though this is all public record anyway...
We submitted our proposals and preliminary research (43 pages of detailed planning focused on development of neuromorphic processing models in high earth orbit), as well as our funding request for $125,000. In that request, every single line item has to be fully accounted for, including salaries. My salary, as project leader, is set at minimum wage. That's about $7,000 for six months of work. As the lowest paid member of the research team, I don't think that "lining my pockets" is the right term.
More importantly, though, is the fact that we've simply made the proposal... hoping to get our shot. My team is eagerly awaiting NASA's decision.
Four years ago, I ran a vegetable farm. Now, because of SBIR grants, we have the chance to change the world. What's so wrong with that?
What do you have to gain by making these kinds of assumptions, anyway?
Hobbyists, eh? Very kind of you to evaluate a team of 17 developers so brazenly.
You're obviously upset here, but I really don't understand why... aside from maybe being incredibly bitter. I didn't do anything but say that I was grateful about having a chance to do something awesome. Whatever your life is like that makes you so hostile is your problem, not mine.
Funding innovation, technology commercialization, and public private partnerships is exactly how we made it to the moon. Countless other inventions have come as a result of NASA's efforts and this funding.
Did you... even watch the video?
You're using the internet right now. Chances are, there's a Qualcomm chip in your phone, which were partly funded by SBIR grants with your (puts on tinfoil hat) STOLEN MONEY.
Innovation is worth investing in, and the ROI data is incredibly abundant.
Ian Gerard You guy hiring?
@All Things Everything ah, I see your edit now. You think $125k is all we go through in 6 months? You should learn to code if you think that's a lot of money, it could change your life! With so many devs on my team, that amount of cash doesn't cover the whole project. Also, it costs the same amount to run an F35 for 3 hours. 6 months of our team's work for the same cost? That's a bargain.
Because I run a private company, my job is to mitigate risk to my employees and shareholders while growing our capabilities and revenues. We don't have the resources to spend on developing a cubesat implementation of our current technology without a NASA grant. So if we want to do that, and we really do, we apply for a grant like 650 other companies do every Spring.
Does that concept just grind your gears or is it autonomous mapping in particular that's got you riled?
@@saultzwtheking1955 not at the moment, but we're growing fast right now so its hard to say what we'll be doing in a few months. Pm me a link to a resume if you want, I'm happy to take a look.
Reduce military funding. Boom.
Asiano Casino dumbo look at president all you need to do is say we need to build a space wall to keep out the space Mexicans
Imperial Web The likely hood of having a government system on another planet is almost like a speck of dust
That is what got the Romans killed not enough army, thought they were safe
Look at Liechtenstein, they didn’t have a army since 1868 and still one of the safer countries to be at
@@sonofben3322 of course, who wants to attack Liechtenstein, it would do more harm than good
We humans are so obsessed with war and fighting for puny matters when we could have been exploring the cosmos in-depth and might actually have been closer to finding signs of extraterrestrial life than right now.
4:29 that's just a gorgeous piece of footage
I think its 3D generated, like in Blender or something. There's no way to achieve that much specularity
This was a powerful message. thank you for spreading common sense.
If NASA wasn't part of a corrupt system that wastes 3x more designing and building rockets then other private organizations. If SpaceX wasn't broke is the correct title. Politicians have power over the types of rockets that NASA builds, and they ask for designs that make us go backwards in technology.
I never clicked so fast. Its a common idea that if NASA had the same as the military budget. We would have colonised half the solar system by now.
would like to know if that’s accurate
The military might have Airpods, but NASA has Five Below earphones