Victorian 😂 No way on Gods earth that place isn’t Jacobean or Elizabethan or even Henrician. It’s shocking architectural stupidity too because the building is just so transparently 16th century
@@KamalKhuhawar also not true. Last I went to Charlecotte the domestic wing had electric light and running water and was acting as an exhibition on country house shooting parties of the 1920s. The contents (like the contents of most multi generational inherited households) represent the period of every monarch from Henry VIII (maybe even earlier given the Lucy’s are a 1066 family) to George IV. Off the top of my head I recall Jacobean plaster around the fires, a regency dining room, 18th century French tapestries, Chinese porcelain from the early East India imports, and a notable 16th century hammerbeam in the great hall. It’s certainly inaccurate to call the house or its contents uniformly Victorian. You ought to write “a house with a predominantly Jacobean extern and an interior representing elements of all periods of interior design between c. 1540-1920” if you want accuracy. However you’re obviously foreign in your pictures. And if you’ve not grown up in England with a family furniture collection and parents who took the time to explain the different ages of design in what you’re set to inherit then it’s not clear how you’d acquire the instinct for dating buildings and furniture on sight
Wow!🤩🤩🤩
thanks for watching
amazing! love it 🤩
thanks a lot
Nice place, and in no sense of jealousy do I ask how the previous owners acquired such wealth? The place is absolutely amazing.
thanks, thanks for watching
Lords of the manor in about 5 fiefdoms. It builds up. The De Lucy family
@@minui8758 (thanks, thanks for watching)
Really want to visit this place 👌
thanks for watching
Victorian 😂 No way on Gods earth that place isn’t Jacobean or Elizabethan or even Henrician. It’s shocking architectural stupidity too because the building is just so transparently 16th century
thanks,( will check) thanks for watching
the interior of the house and all the collections are from Victorian era. that's way its Victorian home.
the structure is from 16th century
@@KamalKhuhawar also not true. Last I went to Charlecotte the domestic wing had electric light and running water and was acting as an exhibition on country house shooting parties of the 1920s. The contents (like the contents of most multi generational inherited households) represent the period of every monarch from Henry VIII (maybe even earlier given the Lucy’s are a 1066 family) to George IV. Off the top of my head I recall Jacobean plaster around the fires, a regency dining room, 18th century French tapestries, Chinese porcelain from the early East India imports, and a notable 16th century hammerbeam in the great hall. It’s certainly inaccurate to call the house or its contents uniformly Victorian. You ought to write “a house with a predominantly Jacobean extern and an interior representing elements of all periods of interior design between c. 1540-1920” if you want accuracy. However you’re obviously foreign in your pictures. And if you’ve not grown up in England with a family furniture collection and parents who took the time to explain the different ages of design in what you’re set to inherit then it’s not clear how you’d acquire the instinct for dating buildings and furniture on sight