Christopher Hitchens interview on "For the Sake of Argument" (1993)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @ManufacturingIntellect
    @ManufacturingIntellect  7 років тому +2

    Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect
    Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259
    Share this video!

  • @iansaron3186
    @iansaron3186 6 років тому +60

    Does this interviewer let Christopher finish 1 sentence in the entire interview?

    • @neilryan4166
      @neilryan4166 5 років тому +11

      Exactly. I wish Rose would shut up and let Hitchens talk.

    • @harryantino
      @harryantino 4 роки тому +8

      neil ryan I think in fairness to Charlie it is only a fifteen minute time slot and he is trying to get some brief answers so he can get all the questions into the interview.

    • @LMR72
      @LMR72 3 роки тому +8

      He never used to let anybody finish anything.

    • @chrispywilliams1992
      @chrispywilliams1992 3 роки тому +6

      Rose cuts him off in every interview they did. extremely irritating

    • @philmitchell91
      @philmitchell91 2 роки тому +7

      It's a conversation more than an interview. Hitchens didn't seem annoyed.

  • @archaicsoul4597
    @archaicsoul4597 Рік тому +1

    It’s pretty funny to watch hitch be as short and impatient with Rose in this interview as Rose is to everyone

  • @johnbmadwis
    @johnbmadwis 2 роки тому +7

    Rose's relentless interruptions makes this unlistenable.

  • @no-oneman.4140
    @no-oneman.4140 Рік тому +1

    Both of these men love the sound of their voices however only one was ever worth listening to. Mr Rose learn to ask a question and then shut up.
    Most of us could listen to Mr Hitchens all day without interruption.

  • @PostApocalypticSure
    @PostApocalypticSure Рік тому

    People keep saying Charlie Rose is particularly irritating in this interview because of his interruptions. However, a wiseman once said that interruption equates to interest. Christopher could just be a particularly interesting person.

  • @jeffmilroy9345
    @jeffmilroy9345 2 роки тому

    Wedding night photo? Hitch baby, you have to be joking. Why get married?

  • @JPL243
    @JPL243 4 роки тому +35

    Charlie Rose is seriously irritating in this

  • @shaungilmartin1505
    @shaungilmartin1505 3 роки тому +22

    interviewer is irritating as hell

  • @harryantino
    @harryantino 4 роки тому +12

    Interesting he already seems to be in transition on the issue of action in Iraq

    • @DiogenesOfDelaware
      @DiogenesOfDelaware 2 роки тому +1

      Sadam was a war criminal...a principled man would of wanted him out the moment he gassed kurds and his own people.
      Also yes very very intriguing to see him begin the formulation of his views on Iraq here.

  • @thefakenewsnetwork8072
    @thefakenewsnetwork8072 2 роки тому +8

    Long live freedom and democratic equality

    • @lucasomar5184
      @lucasomar5184 Рік тому +1

      they're illusory, especially in america

    • @missmiss8359
      @missmiss8359 Рік тому

      That moustached Georgian guy (surprisingly he was a russian chauvinist) in your profile picture would have made you face the wall for "counter revolutionary" activity because of this comment

  • @lucianopavarotti2843
    @lucianopavarotti2843 3 роки тому +4

    3:56 Highly unlikely, Charles.

  • @boazklachkin9661
    @boazklachkin9661 2 роки тому

    charlie rose thorn ...stifle thy self

  • @thesubhumancomedy
    @thesubhumancomedy 2 роки тому +1

    LA, a cultural capital of the world. Well...

  • @peterq6598
    @peterq6598 5 років тому +1

    Perfect Title "...A Manufactured (self) Intellect" i.e. Christopher Hitchens...a 3rd class degree in philosophy passing off as an Intellect with Demons from his past that would not leave him until he succumbs to self Destruction blaming his Father's Genes and unable to LIVE with the Fact that his Mother's Suicide Pact with her Lover is her desire...Taking on the Religious & Intellect world with his radical BIGOTED arguments especially on women doing GOOD for others and Beilltling them with his Derogatory comments and at times VULGARITY to boot emphasising his disgust for what his mother did!!!

    • @stevebradley1683
      @stevebradley1683 5 років тому +9

      Dullard. You. You dullard.

    • @wynty200
      @wynty200 5 років тому +3

      What a magnificent example of projection.

    • @robingale100
      @robingale100 4 роки тому +5

      Sir, you have it wrong....he was a genius....his likes are very few....

    • @peterq6598
      @peterq6598 4 роки тому +1

      @@robingale100 a GenieAss yes I agree!!!...witty and smooth talking is his Forte...NOT wisdom and intellect which he LACKS picking on innocent to Make Fun and in turn picked a line of idiotic Bigots as followers

    • @lfsg689
      @lfsg689 Рік тому

      The poison in your blood may cause you have a heart attack.

  • @ishmael2586
    @ishmael2586 9 місяців тому

    On hindsight hitchens was wrong on many issues. For a start - defending Bosnia? Nah.