Holy shit this is the exact kind of review I wanted to see. You actually shot basically the entirety of the video using the two subject cameras, which sadly most reviewers don't do. They use their personal best cameras (whatever they may be) and splice in a couple clips using the subject camera. The best way to give someone a good idea of how the cameras perform is more examples, and you gave us plenty. Thanks.
Fantastic Review. Do a few of these. A6600 VS A7III Would get a lot of views. Anyone considering the A6600 has to at least think about the A7III as an up grade and someone that is looking at the A7III will look at the A6600 just to make sure they are not over buying for there needs. Again thanks for the great review. Subscribed.
Really good video about the 2 cameras. I recently bought the A6400 and, for the price, I think it’s a very tough camera to beat for a hobbyist photographer, like me.
Now this is a real review, keep it coming like this my man, I am very hard to please When it comes to technicality and reviews but Damn! I am impressed on this one!good job
If I were a run and gun vlogger, I'd get the a6400 + a gimbal. The crane M2 would be the best in price and perrformance. Put a sigma 16mm f1.4 in there and you are set. The IBIS of the a6500 and a6600 is a joke. Even with the 10-18 OSS it does not stabilize well. So, why not just buy a gimbal with the a6400 + a lens? Even the kit lens would be a good starting vlogging lens at 16mm. As for the other points, you are correct. The best of the bunch is the a7-3 + 28-75 f2.8 tamron. Best for the cost and performance. The A7R-3 is ok if you really need the pixel count. If you don't there is the A7-3 and the a6400. Even the a6100 will be good vlogging camera, though you lose the profiles for video there. So, the best is the a6400.
Agreed with or without stabilization ...you really need a gimbal..so really doesn’t matter if the camera got it or not...as you can see a6400 and a7r3..still shaking
I have the A6400 but definitely would love the 42mp on the A7RIII. Great review man. This review is best for ppl who has the A6400 but curious abt the 7III or the R3
@@razafiarisonmichael4421 why would you say that?. I'm betwen these 2, and indecisive yet. I want something that shoots good photos, but also a camera that are i could produce good vlogs with. Which one would you recommend?.
A7riii looked very similar in the first test, however looking at the background, I could tell which camera was which with the difference in the depth of field.
I bought the a6400 with the 16-50 lens. Also bought the sigma 16mm. It’s an amazing lens! Next I want to buy the sigma 30mm 1.4 then the Sony 50mm 1.8 oss lens.
@@TJuice1986 how do you find the camera with the 16-50 lens? how is it working for you without the IBIS? I'm thinking to get this camera for events videography
Razvan-Stefan I love it. I put my a6400 in the smallrig cage then bought the camvate wooden handle for the left side. With these attachments you can make it really smooth!
@@TJuice1986 Thank you for this man! Really helpful comment, what are you using the camera for? How much did you pay for the cage and the wooden handle?
Hi Kyle thx for the video, but what's your opinion between the A7iii with that 17-28 2.8 vs A6600 with Tamron 11-20 2.8 for real estate and maybe some wildlife video in Africa on safari but then with the Sigma 60-600
Can you use Canon 50mm f1.2L with an adaptor on both of these cameras? I have many Canon L lens, and want to switch to the Sony world. Thanks Great video.
Thanks for videos. I've been watching some videos where people justo talk or show the best picture of those cameras. I'm going to buy 6400, just for taking pictures. Are there a better option? In that price. Gracias
Got the cameras right on B-Roll; a7Riii definitely showed wider field of view, which was more pleasing on the water fall, etc. Autofocus obviously goes to the a6400, which we know Sony gave the newest and best (why don't they update firmware for the a7Riii??). Sill, while the focus is slower on the a7Riii, its a nice gentle pull and doesn't seem objectionable to me.
In comparing these cameras, naturally the most important thing is the huge difference in price. The second thing is much more expensive lenses for A7R. And here the most important question is building set with A6400 and Sigma 16mm 1.4 / Sony 70-350mm / Sony 18-105mm (or instead of Sigma 16mm and Sony 18-105mm one lens Tamron 17-70 2.8). A similar kit for the A7R (and with A7R) will already be roughly twice as expensive. Here I come to the point A6400 is a great camera for the price :) Am I thinking right? :)
It would be very interesting if you used the exact same lenses in a7riii apsc mode. There are a couple of reviewers saying a7riii and a7iii give sharper images, despite using lenses designed for the apsc bodies . Perhaps in a future video. Thanks mate
Good idea. I only have the kit lens for apsc, which isn't the greatest, but would be interesting to test that out and also putting the camera into apsc with a FE lens on it. Will try and get this one done in the future.
Thanks for the comparison and trying to match up for apples to apples. It's impossible to do that but you came very close. From a non-pro perspective I thought both cameras failed to give decent stabilization in your video tests regardless of IBIS, OIS, or IBIS+OIS. When I look at it from that viewpoint one needs a hand held gimble to get the best out of these cameras. On tracking the a6400 wins that test but you're comparing apples and oranges on the two cameras as the a6400 has the newer algorithm. For framing the video or picture I like the A7RIII for providing a pleasing depth of field to the subject. From that standpoint it was easy to pick the which was camera a and camera b. Both are very nice cameras but the current comparison would be a6400 vs A7III, Again I think they both have their strengths and are fine cameras.
Enjoyed your presentation Kyle. Very informative. I use two Sony cameras to shoot video of live bands. I have a a6000 that I use with a Sigma 16mm for a semi wide angle shot. I am interested in bringing it up a step with the a6400, but no one keeps them in stock. I would normally have any of those cameras on tripods. I favour the idea that the a6400 does not shut down after 20 minutes like the a6000 does, but i have a few batteries now so interchanging them is not a problem. The a6000 takes good still pictures. Don't think I need ICS though that would be nice. I know the a6500 has it but reviews tend to lean to a6400 for the power features as mentioned. Quick focus is another great feature since musicians tend to move around. P.S. my stepdaughters are Pugliese.
so far, just about 5 minutes in to the video, the post production stabilization makes the background warp almost like you're in a fish tank. I wouldn't describe it as desirable.
I’m a Nikon fanatic using full and crop DSLRs. The only difference I see is the price point - not what they’re capable of. Awhile back I acquired a slightly used a6300 at a bargain from a Sony fanatic who upgraded to a6500. It’s my neck slung test camera I use to dry run photo shoots. I use my Nikon DSLRs for the final shoot. By the way, how can you compare one model to another that cost more than three times it’s value? It would have been very informative if you tested and compared the current a6xxx models from their price point difference, features, torture test results, etc.
I have a question. I own the a7iii which I love for reasons you stated. I would love to hear your insights on which you think is the better buy for a second camera or to be used the same time as a7iii at weddings/events. I love the resolution on the a7riii and the price right now used can be hand for under $2k which is a steal. Then there is the a6400 which gives a lot of bang also for the price. Low light is not as good though. Also another a7iii is in the running but for an extra $400 now a days you can get the a7riii. That’s insane. Thanks for the feedback.
Im probably biased but I’d go with the A7RIII if you shoot 4K30. The crop on the a6400 with that on top of already being a smaller sensor is a lot. Plus the A7RIII can take some great photos if you’re using at a wedding
Wow, I kept guessing the a6400 was the a7riii in the video comparisons. And the difference in photos with the a6400 compared to the a7riii is nothing I can’t easily fix in Lightroom classic. I may go with the a6600 instead of the a6400 for the stabilization though. Thank you!!
Hello Kyle. I just want to start a part time business on wedding videography. Now I considering either want to choose Sony Alpha a6400 or Sony Alpha a7 II. Would you please give me an insight which one better to choose to start with. And also which lenses I can choose for better option. Many thank in return for your help.
Hi Richie, thats a tough call, but I'd go with the a6400 but go with full frame glass if you ever see yourself upgrading. The A7 II is probably a bit better in low light given that it's full frame, but the focus on the a6400 will be much better. The a7 II has in body stabilization, so it also comes down to your equipment. If you are using a monopod or gimbal then the a6400 will be just fine. If you want to handhold and do video I'd push you more toward the A7 II for the in body stabilization. If I had to pick I'd say A6400 with 16-70 mm F4 ZA OSS. That gives you some stabilization, ability to upgrade to a full frame camera eventually, and some great focus/processing power. The downside is it wont be great in low light which could be problematic in some wedding scenarios. Another lens would be the 16-35 f4 OSS, a bit more expensive though. I wouldn't recommend using the A6400 without stabilized glass for video. Even the stabilized glass makes marginal difference but it helps with the jitter a bit.
Considering getting the a6400 but lately i've been thinking about getting the a7III instead because I feel the video quality wouldn't satisfy me talk less of my audience. But after watching this video I think the a6400 will do just fine because I prefer the way the video looked coming out of the a6400 at the start of this video. I don't have a lot of money so I have to worry about how much it'll cost getting lenses and what returns I plan to get from the investment. Now I'm more confident in the video quality and I think I can make up for some of the shortcomings for my workflow through post. hanks for saving me money! Liked ans subscribed!
The review is very good, but the real difference in quality is in the result of megapixels in photography and the quality of the logarithmic in slog 2 & 3
I want to buy the A7iii or the Alpha 6600, but I can't make up my mind. Is focus tracking really such a big advantage? The camera should mainly be used as a family camera. It is important to me that eye AF works. The Sony Alpha 6300 was often not bright enough for me (sigma prime numbers), so I think of the Alpha 7iii
There was no point in the "reveal" in the beginning, as you already showed your test rig with the placement of each camera. ;) Also, even without that, that shallower depth of field of the A7 III was pretty apprent on the right.
That was a great comparison. What I learnt is that 1080p in a6400 is not as good as it should be. It's way too soft and 4k comes with a crop. I think you have rightly recommended A7-3. Nice video.
Amazing review! Just what I needed to hear from both bodies, I guess I'll go with the 6400 and save for a 10-18mm lens to get a more wide angle considering the crop it has
@@landmine8206 oh I never thought of that, will try to get a 30 then. I currently have the 50mm but considering the crop, it makes it feel like an 85mm
Holy shit this is the exact kind of review I wanted to see. You actually shot basically the entirety of the video using the two subject cameras, which sadly most reviewers don't do. They use their personal best cameras (whatever they may be) and splice in a couple clips using the subject camera. The best way to give someone a good idea of how the cameras perform is more examples, and you gave us plenty. Thanks.
holy shit, this is exactly what I typed into the search bar of the kind of review I wanted to see. just incredible
One of the best comparison I've seen between these. Thanks!
Great review. One of the best comparisons I've seen for a while. Keep it up.
You did a great job! Probably the most informative and interesting comparison!
wait what? 3k subs? You deserve more. great stuff man keep it up
5.7k now.. that's quite an increase!
Love your comparison videos. I just decided to buy the A6600 and the RX100vii based on your videos. Keep the great content coming.
Fantastic Review. Do a few of these. A6600 VS A7III Would get a lot of views. Anyone considering the A6600 has to at least think about the A7III as an up grade and someone that is looking at the A7III will look at the A6600 just to make sure they are not over buying for there needs. Again thanks for the great review. Subscribed.
Really good video about the 2 cameras. I recently bought the A6400 and, for the price, I think it’s a very tough camera to beat for a hobbyist photographer, like me.
Wao..tell.me about 6400 pics ?
Your review was very professional and very visually pleasing. Thanks bro
Now this is a real review, keep it coming like this my man, I am very hard to please When it comes to technicality and reviews but Damn! I am impressed on this one!good job
very good video bro!
im from Brasil and here i found a better explanation then the others!
good work!
Welcome to the channel!
You deserve so much more subs! What a great review man
Man, you are good at this. Thank you for the in depth review and also for your opinions which I agree with. Peter.
U deserve more man! Great vid. Thank you so much.
The exact comparison video I was looking for! Thanks!!
Sir i really liked how you explained i felt this was the honest review ❤️
For the content quality, you earned a new sub.
Very thorough review. Thank you!
Great video man thanks for the help!
Thank you for info. I am planning to purchase a6400 and vlog our travel.
Great video! Keep creating great content bro!
Amazing review! I'm surprised you don't have more subs
Bro your channel is way underrated. Keep it up!
Thanks!
Love the comparisons!!!!
nice review bro, great job!
If I were a run and gun vlogger, I'd get the a6400 + a gimbal. The crane M2 would be the best in price and perrformance. Put a sigma 16mm f1.4 in there and you are set. The IBIS of the a6500 and a6600 is a joke. Even with the 10-18 OSS it does not stabilize well. So, why not just buy a gimbal with the a6400 + a lens? Even the kit lens would be a good starting vlogging lens at 16mm.
As for the other points, you are correct. The best of the bunch is the a7-3 + 28-75 f2.8 tamron. Best for the cost and performance. The A7R-3 is ok if you really need the pixel count. If you don't there is the A7-3 and the a6400. Even the a6100 will be good vlogging camera, though you lose the profiles for video there. So, the best is the a6400.
Yeah. The IBIS does suck.
Was thinking same still doubtful about 6400 m2 16mm combo balance
Same!
@@jishnu3031 i have it its amazing!
Agreed with or without stabilization ...you really need a gimbal..so really doesn’t matter if the camera got it or not...as you can see a6400 and a7r3..still shaking
At 8:57 notice how A6400 was trying to focus on the guy in background, and you at quick intervals 👍👍👍 unexpected but cool!😂😂
Great review. Best explanation!
THIS is a comparison I wish all the click baiters out there learned from you. Awesome work.
Thank LM! Glad you enjoyed it
Great video! Thanks much for the advice. (Side note: the A7RIII footage with FCPX stabilization almost looks like a green screen effect.)
Was never into your channel before
Seen your hard work in this video 🙏
Subscribed ❤️
Great review, thanks!
*Hi Kyle, I like your videos bro.*
*as a youtuber myself, I think you have a natural act for it.*
*keep it up!*
Very Very good job Man, thanks
Yeah you could easily spot the crop factor. Also the stabilisation kinda made it easy to guess which one was which.
Great video! Looking at this video cause I was just determining between the 2, I think the a6400 is better in my opinion.
Great video !
Good video, good comparison!
I have the A6400 but definitely would love the 42mp on the A7RIII. Great review man. This review is best for ppl who has the A6400 but curious abt the 7III or the R3
I have the A7RIII, I want the a6400 🤣
@@razafiarisonmichael4421 why would you say that?. I'm betwen these 2, and indecisive yet. I want something that shoots good photos, but also a camera that are i could produce good vlogs with. Which one would you recommend?.
Great, unbiased review. Enjoying your content, you just got another subscriber.
Glad you enjoyed it, welcome to the channel!
Good explanation bro..! 👍👍👍
A7riii looked very similar in the first test, however looking at the background, I could tell which camera was which with the difference in the depth of field.
Just bought the 6400 with the 18-105 lens.
I'm probably going to also buy Sigma 16mm and Sigma 30mm.
I bought the a6400 with the 16-50 lens. Also bought the sigma 16mm. It’s an amazing lens! Next I want to buy the sigma 30mm 1.4 then the Sony 50mm 1.8 oss lens.
@@TJuice1986 how do you find the camera with the 16-50 lens? how is it working for you without the IBIS? I'm thinking to get this camera for events videography
Razvan-Stefan I love it. I put my a6400 in the smallrig cage then bought the camvate wooden handle for the left side. With these attachments you can make it really smooth!
@@TJuice1986 Thank you for this man! Really helpful comment, what are you using the camera for? How much did you pay for the cage and the wooden handle?
@@TJuice1986 get the sigma 56mm f1.4 instead of the sony 50mm
What would be the best video setting for Sony 6400. Make a video over it
Thanks for the review
I've the a6400, but it's jittering when you're panning.. really annoying if you want that smooth rushes
Awesome comparison
Thank You !!!!
Is the video quality improved if we shoot on the full frame sensor ( suppose all settings are the same ? )
Would the Sony 10-18 f/4 with OSS resolve some of the 4k cropping issues with the 6400? Great review!
Nope
I wish you would do a same comparison with A7III vs A6500 which both have IBIS
Awesome Work 👍
Hi Kyle thx for the video, but what's your opinion between the A7iii with that 17-28 2.8 vs A6600 with Tamron 11-20 2.8 for real estate and maybe some wildlife video in Africa on safari but then with the Sigma 60-600
Excellent, thanks!
Can you use Canon 50mm f1.2L with an adaptor on both of these cameras? I have many Canon L lens, and want to switch to the Sony world. Thanks Great video.
Awesome thanks bro
Thanks for videos. I've been watching some videos where people justo talk or show the best picture of those cameras. I'm going to buy 6400, just for taking pictures. Are there a better option? In that price. Gracias
Got the cameras right on B-Roll; a7Riii definitely showed wider field of view, which was more pleasing on the water fall, etc. Autofocus obviously goes to the a6400, which we know Sony gave the newest and best (why don't they update firmware for the a7Riii??). Sill, while the focus is slower on the a7Riii, its a nice gentle pull and doesn't seem objectionable to me.
Im not a camera guy and didnt care to sub to channel but your videos are soo good i had to👍👍👍 great work man
Haha thanks man! My content is all over the place so hopefully you'll enjoy it. Check out some of the latest stuff.
Great compare
I heard the a7riii got a firmware update. Would you know if it included some autofocus optimizations?
Sir, i can't photos blur Sony hx400v. So could you give me some recommend.
I loved the auto focus test. Nice
In comparing these cameras, naturally the most important thing is the huge difference in price. The second thing is much more expensive lenses for A7R. And here the most important question is building set with A6400 and Sigma 16mm 1.4 / Sony 70-350mm / Sony 18-105mm (or instead of Sigma 16mm and Sony 18-105mm one lens Tamron 17-70 2.8). A similar kit for the A7R (and with A7R) will already be roughly twice as expensive. Here I come to the point A6400 is a great camera for the price :)
Am I thinking right? :)
It would be very interesting if you used the exact same lenses in a7riii apsc mode. There are a couple of reviewers saying a7riii and a7iii give sharper images, despite using lenses designed for the apsc bodies . Perhaps in a future video. Thanks mate
Good idea. I only have the kit lens for apsc, which isn't the greatest, but would be interesting to test that out and also putting the camera into apsc with a FE lens on it. Will try and get this one done in the future.
Thanks for the comparison and trying to match up for apples to apples. It's impossible to do that but you came very close. From a non-pro perspective I thought both cameras failed to give decent stabilization in your video tests regardless of IBIS, OIS, or IBIS+OIS. When I look at it from that viewpoint one needs a hand held gimble to get the best out of these cameras. On tracking the a6400 wins that test but you're comparing apples and oranges on the two cameras as the a6400 has the newer algorithm. For framing the video or picture I like the A7RIII for providing a pleasing depth of field to the subject. From that standpoint it was easy to pick the which was camera a and camera b. Both are very nice cameras but the current comparison would be a6400 vs A7III, Again I think they both have their strengths and are fine cameras.
Enjoyed your presentation Kyle. Very informative. I use two Sony cameras to shoot video of live bands. I have a a6000 that I use with a Sigma 16mm for a semi wide angle shot. I am interested in bringing it up a step with the a6400, but no one keeps them in stock. I would normally have any of those cameras on tripods. I favour the idea that the a6400 does not shut down after 20 minutes like the a6000 does, but i have a few batteries now so interchanging them is not a problem. The a6000 takes good still pictures. Don't think I need ICS though that would be nice. I know the a6500 has it but reviews tend to lean to a6400 for the power features as mentioned. Quick focus is another great feature since musicians tend to move around. P.S. my stepdaughters are Pugliese.
W le pugliesi :) ciao dall'Italia
is there an alternative to the flip screen on the A7R3?
best review thks
Pretty great video :)
Realally tqqq soo much broo..i have mre douts for cemaras,now some douts are clear.thank u sooo much broo..👌👌❤️❤️❤️❤️a650 autofocus are awesomee
So much crop on a6400, but for the price with that quality, it's crazee
Crop is only in 4k 30p not in 4k 25p.
Jossi crop on the A6400 is 1:5 so a 16mm lens on the A7 is 16mm where on the A6400 the same lens is 24mm.
@@lasarith2 yeah, i'm refering to full frame sensor.
The lens is $$$$$
Jossi what is the crop mean in here?
Great comparison Kyle!
Thanks!
can you say something between an Alpha 6600 and an a7iii? its nearly the same price (with the sony 16-55 2.8 and the Tamron 28-75 2.8)
what prime lens you recommend,that will give a pretty video quality image,for a6400
The Sigma Trinity
so far, just about 5 minutes in to the video, the post production stabilization makes the background warp almost like you're in a fish tank. I wouldn't describe it as desirable.
I’m a Nikon fanatic using full and crop DSLRs. The only difference I see is the price point - not what they’re capable of. Awhile back I acquired a slightly used a6300 at a bargain from a Sony fanatic who upgraded to a6500. It’s my neck slung test camera I use to dry run photo shoots. I use my Nikon DSLRs for the final shoot.
By the way, how can you compare one model to another that cost more than three times it’s value? It would have been very informative if you tested and compared the current a6xxx models from their price point difference, features, torture test results, etc.
I have a question. I own the a7iii which I love for reasons you stated. I would love to hear your insights on which you think is the better buy for a second camera or to be used the same time as a7iii at weddings/events. I love the resolution on the a7riii and the price right now used can be hand for under $2k which is a steal. Then there is the a6400 which gives a lot of bang also for the price. Low light is not as good though. Also another a7iii is in the running but for an extra $400 now a days you can get the a7riii. That’s insane. Thanks for the feedback.
Im probably biased but I’d go with the A7RIII if you shoot 4K30. The crop on the a6400 with that on top of already being a smaller sensor is a lot. Plus the A7RIII can take some great photos if you’re using at a wedding
I liked and subscribed! Love your comparison!
Yes the I noticed more field of view with the 85 and a6400 so close up
Can we compare Panasonic HC-X1000 with this ? which one is better?
What's the music at the beginning?
Wow, I kept guessing the a6400 was the a7riii in the video comparisons.
And the difference in photos with the a6400 compared to the a7riii is nothing I can’t easily fix in Lightroom classic.
I may go with the a6600 instead of the a6400 for the stabilization though.
Thank you!!
im using a6400, can i use super 35mm mode for stills? if yes how? thank you very much to anyone that can help me
Looks like you stabilized in post on the outdoor shots. Would’ve been nice to see just how shaky it was
Hello Kyle. I just want to start a part time business on wedding videography.
Now I considering either want to choose Sony Alpha a6400 or Sony Alpha a7 II.
Would you please give me an insight which one better to choose to start with.
And also which lenses I can choose for better option.
Many thank in return for your help.
Hi Richie, thats a tough call, but I'd go with the a6400 but go with full frame glass if you ever see yourself upgrading. The A7 II is probably a bit better in low light given that it's full frame, but the focus on the a6400 will be much better. The a7 II has in body stabilization, so it also comes down to your equipment. If you are using a monopod or gimbal then the a6400 will be just fine. If you want to handhold and do video I'd push you more toward the A7 II for the in body stabilization.
If I had to pick I'd say A6400 with 16-70 mm F4 ZA OSS. That gives you some stabilization, ability to upgrade to a full frame camera eventually, and some great focus/processing power. The downside is it wont be great in low light which could be problematic in some wedding scenarios. Another lens would be the 16-35 f4 OSS, a bit more expensive though. I wouldn't recommend using the A6400 without stabilized glass for video. Even the stabilized glass makes marginal difference but it helps with the jitter a bit.
Thanks for the video. I'd say A7 series is maybe more for pro users? But in a general way, the images looks nice to me with both cameras.
Considering getting the a6400 but lately i've been thinking about getting the a7III instead because I feel the video quality wouldn't satisfy me talk less of my audience. But after watching this video I think the a6400 will do just fine because I prefer the way the video looked coming out of the a6400 at the start of this video. I don't have a lot of money so I have to worry about how much it'll cost getting lenses and what returns I plan to get from the investment. Now I'm more confident in the video quality and I think I can make up for some of the shortcomings for my workflow through post. hanks for saving me money! Liked ans subscribed!
Glad I was able to help, welcome to the channel!
@@KylePugliese thanks so much for the great video. Would you say that I could use the a6400 for wedding photography?. At least at the beginning.
The review is very good, but the real difference in quality is in the result of megapixels in photography and the quality of the logarithmic in slog 2 & 3
There's always the 1018 f/4 for vlogging.
Can you show an 8 by 10 print comparison?
Sony 6400 crop in 4k ? I thought it recording in 6k and rescale to 4k . Its record as super 35mm, but still crop the image ???
@Kyle Pugliese, please let me know what is that song starting at 05:01
Anyone can help :(?
GOOD INFORMATION
I want to buy the A7iii or the Alpha 6600, but I can't make up my mind.
Is focus tracking really such a big advantage? The camera should mainly be used as a family camera. It is important to me that eye AF works.
The Sony Alpha 6300 was often not bright enough for me (sigma prime numbers), so I think of the Alpha 7iii
There was no point in the "reveal" in the beginning, as you already showed your test rig with the placement of each camera. ;) Also, even without that, that shallower depth of field of the A7 III was pretty apprent on the right.
thank you
That was a great comparison. What I learnt is that 1080p in a6400 is not as good as it should be. It's way too soft and 4k comes with a crop. I think you have rightly recommended A7-3. Nice video.
Thanks. Agreed on the 1080 being soft on the a6400
GReat review. What would you recommend for talking head in a studio?
For that type of content you really don’t need to worry much about autofocus and you have controlled lighting so the a6400 would do extremely well
@@KylePugliese Thanks for the response. You rock
Will a gimbal help with the stabilization of both cameras?
Ofcourse
Amazing review! Just what I needed to hear from both bodies, I guess I'll go with the 6400 and save for a 10-18mm lens to get a more wide angle considering the crop it has
It'll be too wide even with the crop sensor I've got 16mm sigma and its still too wide!
@@landmine8206 oh I never thought of that, will try to get a 30 then. I currently have the 50mm but considering the crop, it makes it feel like an 85mm