Landlord Tries To Kick Law Firm Out Of Building | Suits | PD TV

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 чер 2022
  • Shady Landlord David Fox approaches Donna and tricks her into admitting that the Law Firm restructured, which violates the lease and allows him to evict them in 90 days.
    From Suits Season 7 Episode 14 'Pulling The Goalie' - Mike's attempt to distract Harvey with a case backfires and Louis tries not to let emotion affect his judgement in a legal duel. Donna finds a way to prove her worth to the firm.
    Suits (2011 - 2019): Mike Ross, a talented young college dropout, is hired as an associate by Harvey Specter, one of New York's best lawyers. They must handle cases while keeping Mike's qualifications a secret.
    Watch Suits Season 1 - 9 Here: www.uphe.com/tv/suits-the-com...
    Welcome to PD TV! A channel dedicated to your favourite Police Dramas! Featuring the most iconic moments from your favourite shows. Follow the professional and personal lives of the law enforcement from the crime scene to the court room.
    Subscribe for more moments like this: / @pdtv.official
    #PDTV #CrimeDrama #Suits #MikeRoss #HarveySpector #LouisLitt
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 615

  • @PDTV.Official
    @PDTV.Official  Рік тому +56

    Watch all of your favourite Mike Ross, Harvey Spector & Louis Litt moments on our Suits playlist here - ua-cam.com/video/jFGXYYo0GUA/v-deo.html
    Subscribe to PD TV here - ua-cam.com/channels/cfJ9wYielnEqrZWFNsNFBA.htmlfeatured

  • @sodalimesalt
    @sodalimesalt Рік тому +488

    Donna talks to a dude on the street, prints out a document he asked for and hands it to him without any official meeting with minutes, consults nothing👀

    • @enkiimuto1041
      @enkiimuto1041 10 місяців тому +26

      Best part is people on other comments saying "oh she isn't a lawyer".
      Dude, she is basically the head of the lawyer firm, she doesn't need to be.

    • @mt3311
      @mt3311 Місяць тому +2

      @@enkiimuto1041 She is head of the business side, not the law side. There is a difference.

    • @OlhaMaksy
      @OlhaMaksy Місяць тому +1

      @@mt3311 For a business part rule is the same. Any action can be done only after an official recorded request

    • @insane_wayne9499
      @insane_wayne9499 29 днів тому

      Donna stupid real blonde

  • @alexanderkim4889
    @alexanderkim4889 Рік тому +624

    I know this is a show that is notorious for getting things wrong, but in case anyone was wondering, landlords, especially on this level, will almost never do this. Office leases usually don't last much longer than 5 years, so landlords typically wait out a lease and then renegotiate for the next lease term. Sure, no landlord wants to have rents below market, but kicking out a multi-floor tenant like this would only cause a massive spike in vacancy that would take months (maybe years) to fill and will probably require millions in new tenant improvements allowances. If the landlord had such a problem with one of their largest tenants, they wouldn't have settled on the original lease terms / not invested in the property in the first place.

    • @larrymace2361
      @larrymace2361 Рік тому +38

      Yup, landlords hate one thing and that is kicking out a paying tenant even when it comes to the best spots in the world they won't do it it just costs too much money. They have to pay themselves the taxes on the location and those add up kicking out a paying tenant can be financially devastating it can take years to get a new tenant in even if they want the property on day 1. I know there are premium spots in new york that have been vacant for 5+ years because it is hard to rent out even premium spots that cost 50k+ a month. So yeah you would have to be a giant arrogant pr!ck with significant money to burn to be willing to kick out a premium tenant who pays rent on a premium spot. Premium doesn't mean that someone will want the place it only means that it is a good spot and %99.9 of businesses don't need a 50-100k+ a month spot.

    • @TheLenaslo
      @TheLenaslo Рік тому +20

      I work in commercial real estate and this is very true. The value of CRE is heavily based on vacancy. The more floors, the more lenient they will be.

    • @steadydets
      @steadydets 11 місяців тому +7

      And if we were being super realistic about the NYC market right now, commercial rents have taken a nose dive off a cliff with no apparent landing in sight. Dark days ahead

    • @arianebolt1575
      @arianebolt1575 11 місяців тому +5

      He was trying to bluff them into doubling their rent payments. That, or he had a suitable renter already lined up.

    • @passiveaggressivenegotiato8087
      @passiveaggressivenegotiato8087 11 місяців тому

      Because it's hollywood marxist bs to demonize landlords.

  • @rikkilleen3169
    @rikkilleen3169 Рік тому +2272

    How do you, as a supposedly premier legal professional, sue someone about your lease, but you don't read your lease or understand if you have been properly served?

    • @erickcarreno2929
      @erickcarreno2929 Рік тому +168

      Donna isn’t a lawyer

    • @henrybutchy3242
      @henrybutchy3242 Рік тому +120

      You don't just read your lease (or the lease), you read it several times, and then twice more.

    • @John-if2uz
      @John-if2uz Рік тому +23

      She got tricked

    • @mpamphsxatz2263
      @mpamphsxatz2263 Рік тому +73

      @@John-if2uz these are the "best" layers in town. Being tricked is not an option

    • @IronLegionnaire1
      @IronLegionnaire1 Рік тому +101

      @@mpamphsxatz2263 again, Donna isn't a lawyer. He specifically dealt with Donna knowing she wasn't a lawyer.

  • @Jealod24
    @Jealod24 Рік тому +984

    The frustrating part of all these shows is people not asking for help

    • @James-hs3tu
      @James-hs3tu Рік тому +31

      Not telling the other partners!!!!

    • @GalacticBlader
      @GalacticBlader Рік тому +12

      i agree everyones to egotistical

    • @skotnica93
      @skotnica93 Рік тому

      @@GalacticBlader It's among the factors that impact success. Along with aggression, ambition, and disagreeableness.

    • @calipdis2
      @calipdis2 Рік тому +1

      And saying Im sorry all the time (without being sorry really)

    • @tjanderson5892
      @tjanderson5892 Рік тому +2

      Used to eat at me so much, but had to learn to let it go bc there literally wouldn’t be a show w/o it lol. Harvey, Louis, Mike, Donna, Rachel. Every dramatic plot came from characters consistently being incompetent and not changing. Donna the worst of course.

  • @doodooclowney1518
    @doodooclowney1518 Рік тому +2303

    Another example of the writers trying to make Donna way more important than she actually was.

    • @cu7695
      @cu7695 Рік тому +251

      True observation. Honestly I see lot of Donna type people irl. Don't have clue about business, tech or anything in that matter. Got hired because of dad's friend owns the business and these people start feeling important than they really are.

    • @nanettealegado6190
      @nanettealegado6190 Рік тому +31

      God, we share the same sentiments.

    • @allaboutNDIRISH
      @allaboutNDIRISH Рік тому +69

      @@cu7695 donna was important lol you clearly never watched the show

    • @uditkumarpatra5236
      @uditkumarpatra5236 Рік тому +21

      Actually she was

    • @maxp9646
      @maxp9646 Рік тому +25

      Wokeism

  • @crashpal
    @crashpal Рік тому +421

    "YOU'LL GET YOUR RENT WHEN YOU FIX THE DAMN DOOR!"

  • @virenderyadav9248
    @virenderyadav9248 Рік тому +728

    So Donna messed up twice and instead of doing the right thing whenever she should have gone. To the right person which Rachel asked her to do she just brought up her personal life... She really didn't deserved to be a COO..... What makes her cringe is her overconfidence instead of being polite and knowing her limitations

    • @rahularora8849
      @rahularora8849 Рік тому +6

      didn't deserve*

    • @naomiwood1970
      @naomiwood1970 Рік тому +1

      She’s SO ANNOYING in these series

    • @kaz4442
      @kaz4442 Рік тому +37

      And the fact that she couldn't seperate her personal life from the interests of the firm at crucial times. She was terrible whenever it mattered lol.

    • @A-myth
      @A-myth Рік тому +3

      Well a CFO is supposed to handle finances of the firm, she just tried to do her job and not be shown as weak. Harvey has done that multiple times.

    • @ronilsondisouza
      @ronilsondisouza Рік тому +3

      ... and we could replace "Donna" with EVERY NAME of that show's characters.

  • @agb1953
    @agb1953 Рік тому +326

    Anybody who has ever been in the gallery and watched real lawyers perform knows that they aren't this smart, this quick witted, or this entertaining.

  • @marklance033
    @marklance033 Рік тому +20

    0:30 Where'd the coffee go? ☕️

  • @Taylexwow
    @Taylexwow Рік тому +92

    This is the same show were Mike Ross throws down a folder, says its a sworn affidavit during the Partner's meeting to get rid of Hardman and NOT ONE DAMN SUPPOSEDLY HARVARD EDUCATED ATTORNEY BOTHERED TO PICK IT UP AND LOOK AT IT......Cause lawyers never lie I guess.

    • @christophercrafte
      @christophercrafte Рік тому +9

      lawyers cant lie. that's against the law and another lawyer would notice that immediately.

    • @NNJAjew
      @NNJAjew Рік тому

      Hardman could've opened it up himself if he knew it wasn't real

  • @tccsargent
    @tccsargent Рік тому +417

    The whole premise of this vignette, from the 'restructuring' lease-defect premise, to the even more ridiculous 'air rights' ploy, shows how difficult it is to emulate real life legal situations with a fictional drama. None of these shows mirror the reality of their professions (law, criminal justice, medicine, etc) very accurately, but I would say that 'House' was the most successful drama of the genre, even though it, too, called for a large suspension of disbelief.

    • @leaveittostever
      @leaveittostever Рік тому +34

      Sounds like you should just stop watching TV and just go to work? It's series genre play, not a documentary or docu-drama. Go find what's right for you or stop watching.

    • @paulwilson8169
      @paulwilson8169 Рік тому +7

      If only it were a fictional, dramatized tv show instead of a documentary eh.............

    • @HellstreamGames
      @HellstreamGames Рік тому +16

      Yesh youre right, court room scenes should have more dead and awkward silences and coughs. Scrubs should have had more time taking place in the waiting room, and cop shows should be 70% paperwork scenes

    • @sonofizzy
      @sonofizzy Рік тому +3

      So, why is the "'air rights' ploy" "ridiculous"? Don't be shy, now. :)

    • @highlyillegalpigeon
      @highlyillegalpigeon Рік тому

      @@HellstreamGames Why portray them in the first place then? It's worthless escapism designed to make people live in dream worlds rather than reality.

  • @roronoazoro276
    @roronoazoro276 Рік тому +48

    Donna's charector keep getting worse season after season.
    She was just a secretary and that storyline suited her perfectly for like
    4 seasons.
    Every time they try to build her up it was just total nonsense.
    The new secretary Harvy hired Gretchen was more fun than donna

    • @somyapatel7047
      @somyapatel7047 Рік тому +5

      Exactly and the reason was she knew her role and never deviated from it

  • @cello2ma
    @cello2ma 8 місяців тому +53

    For those who don't watch the show, Donna is Harvey's secretary, and Rachel is paralegal. He approached Donna first because he knew she wasn't a lawyer.

    • @AlezanDeer
      @AlezanDeer 5 місяців тому +14

      Donna is no longer Harvey's secretary, she is COO and Rachel is a lawyer. He approached Donna because she was new to her position and cheated on her.
      But he fell into his own pit.

  • @badseednut
    @badseednut Рік тому +63

    One of the few times I will agree that Donna's ego was the only reason she ended up into this situation. She got cocky for becoming a COO, and she thought that Max is flirting her. However she got served the same plate twice which proved to be Max's biggest mistake as this was what pushed her to come with such badass idea. It served her right in the beginning but she managed to turn the tables so kudos to her.

    • @raysmith1359
      @raysmith1359 Рік тому +6

      She didnt think of the solution, rachel did. Rachel was an actual lawyer. Or to be fair, both her and rachel thought of it. Donna was just a career legal secretary. She said it herself, she deserved COO because she proved her loyalty, not because of her skills or knowledge.

    • @prongs4137
      @prongs4137 10 місяців тому +1

      So she's like season 1 Harvey?

    • @blanche596
      @blanche596 День тому

      She didn't come up with the idea, Rachel pulled the all nighter and came up with it. She just told Rachel to pull an all nighter...

  • @haroldmoskowitz6397
    @haroldmoskowitz6397 Рік тому +83

    The worst lawyer in the world will, at least, look at the lease.

  • @raunaksharma3456
    @raunaksharma3456 Рік тому +57

    That's all good, but u have to get the amended lease signed, and then carry it with you, not leave it with him

  • @X2yt
    @X2yt 8 місяців тому +19

    The stupidest part of this entire situation is that multi-million dollar high-profile ultra-famous world-renovned law firm leases it's offices instead of just buying them outright. Like, sure, some small companies lease stuff, but most of the big companies in any sphere own their buildings outright, even skyscrapers.

    • @jimland7176
      @jimland7176 2 місяці тому

      Probably in this case given that it is HQ. I might be splitting hairs a bit, but a lot of even big companies will lease out their regional offices

    • @MattyVice
      @MattyVice 28 днів тому

      None of the big law firms in NYC own the building they operate in. Youre a fool. Even HQs are leased by all except the tech giants that own full blown campuses

    • @bagalao77
      @bagalao77 7 днів тому

      They aren't in the re biz, also tax implications

    • @jeremykothe2847
      @jeremykothe2847 2 дні тому

      huh. I wonder who all the renters in the large buildings are then?

  • @strictlyp532
    @strictlyp532 Рік тому +147

    Since when is the COO and a junior lawyer of a mid size firm able to buy the most valuable air rights in the world, overnight, without asking a single person within the firm? Such a stupid storyline.

    • @J-C_
      @J-C_ Рік тому +37

      Agreed, but to further expand on that, wouldn’t a halfway competent owner already have the air rights around his properties? But anything to prop up two characters in the name of equity. Yep, a very stupid storyline.

    • @d33763
      @d33763 Рік тому +11

      I guess they used the petty cash account :)

    • @calipdis2
      @calipdis2 Рік тому +3

      Because is a fictional show -_-

    • @strictlyp532
      @strictlyp532 Рік тому +1

      @@calipdis2 Ok, thank you for clarifying how television and cinema work.

    • @suvajitmukherjee9674
      @suvajitmukherjee9674 Рік тому

      lol wtf

  • @kincaidwolf5184
    @kincaidwolf5184 Рік тому +191

    Nothing unethical took place here. The firm broke the lease of the contract and because their lease is half the market value they have been asked for a new lease... the whole dramatisation is so high-school.

    • @Jomskylark
      @Jomskylark Рік тому +30

      I mean you kinda ignored the parts where the landlord tricked the law firm twice. If they just wanted better market value they can just be upfront and say the lease was broken here's the new agreement. The unethical aspect was resorting to trickery to get it

    • @talisredstar1543
      @talisredstar1543 Рік тому +2

      @@Jomskylark And the dramatization was spectacular.

    • @ReethCaldarson
      @ReethCaldarson Рік тому +13

      @@Jomskylark was it though? he was up against the "best lawfirm ever" - they would not have paid and found a legal way around it while making millions - he just got them to admit on paper what was true anyway

    • @jgg204
      @jgg204 Рік тому +25

      @@Jomskylark he didn't trick the law firm, he tricked a woman who had no business being in the position she was given

    • @SRMNote
      @SRMNote Рік тому +3

      @@Jomskylark and that law firms never tricked anyone before? also a law firm would tell you if your gonna sign a contract like that have a lawyer look over it so you don't get F. the law firm couldn't even do that for them self. also did you skip the first minute and 20 seconds? he was upfront and said the lease was broken when they took jessica off the wall.

  • @OiVinn-eq1ml
    @OiVinn-eq1ml Рік тому +15

    She isn’t a lawyer nor read the lease. That’s why he chosen her. Sneaky sneaky

  • @Tap-a-roo
    @Tap-a-roo Рік тому +504

    He’s far more clever than she is. Far, far more clever. She fell for the trap entirely. Rachel is also useless because she didn’t do her due diligence like Mike would have. Fox would have also owned the air rights already. Entire storyline is stupid designed to make Donna look like she understands people when in reality she hasn’t a clue.

    • @simone3633
      @simone3633 Рік тому +31

      What is the reality about?
      It's a show and Donna is the way the writers wanted her to

    • @Tap-a-roo
      @Tap-a-roo Рік тому +14

      @@simone3633 and now the writers are showing you more of a dose of reality rather than she’s “Donna”

    • @swadhinsatpathy4527
      @swadhinsatpathy4527 Рік тому +49

      Donna is the most overrated character of the entire show.

    • @konstantinos4395
      @konstantinos4395 Рік тому +14

      Do you mean a developer with an unobstructed view of central park isn't just sitting waiting for someone to build in front of him??? Interesting

    • @deepar499
      @deepar499 Рік тому +2

      Your comments deserves an Oscar.

  • @samvilms
    @samvilms 3 місяці тому +5

    Maturing is realizing that Donna causes most of the firms problems and would have been fired if Harvey did not have a weird soft spot for her.

  • @Guy_LastName
    @Guy_LastName Рік тому +189

    theyre paying HALF the market rent? any other landlord would do the same

    • @sriramvecham4369
      @sriramvecham4369 Рік тому +17

      not if your tenants are lawyers

    • @philwill0123
      @philwill0123 Рік тому +24

      Nah landlords happily agreed a long term rate and then saw how "successful" the tenant got.

    • @biocapsule7311
      @biocapsule7311 Рік тому +6

      Oh is that how you justify unethical behaviour from landlords? I am not particularly sympathetic to high power law firms, but if a landlord is doing something like this to low-income people... something bad should happen to him.

    • @shanekeenaNYC
      @shanekeenaNYC Рік тому +3

      @@biocapsule7311 Unethical doesn't mean illegal. Now, I am neither as sympathetic to rich elitists, but you have to make that separation somewhere and let the market do its thing.

  • @Asphaltracergamer
    @Asphaltracergamer 10 місяців тому +10

    That walk at the end they all do🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡

  • @revydmat
    @revydmat Рік тому +8

    Maybe he is tired of his tenants pretending that their offices are in NYC but they are actually in Toronto.

  • @stephengamber7000
    @stephengamber7000 3 дні тому

    "I don't think it's possible to have a bad time if you're around" SMOOTH. Gotta remember that line.

  • @nanettealegado6190
    @nanettealegado6190 Рік тому +114

    Donna, an assistant can talk like this to a landlord. Suits is a good show but I find it irritating how they put Donna as assistant and giving her script like an attorney or senior management position. They should give Donna an attorney role or senior manager position. Donna’s insane role here is why I stopped watching this tv show.

    • @liammason-smith2363
      @liammason-smith2363 Рік тому +19

      Well at this point she was COO. Chief Operations Officer or something like that, a very high ranking position

    • @brettiwejor5936
      @brettiwejor5936 Рік тому +3

      She was not an assistant at the time she was a coo buddy

    • @jgg204
      @jgg204 Рік тому +12

      @@brettiwejor5936 and this little exchange showed why she shouldn't be

    • @marioalll
      @marioalll Рік тому +3

      Donna was the COO, I think that most of you forgot that characters need to evolve through the seasons

  • @waldomauriciojovediaz9043
    @waldomauriciojovediaz9043 Рік тому +263

    Donna has to be the most incompetent character I've ever seen

    • @deepar499
      @deepar499 Рік тому +11

      Apart from her sexually appealing beautiful whatever.

    • @lowkey621
      @lowkey621 Рік тому +28

      She was a very competent PA, she became incompetent when Harvey made her COO. I mean who turns down a promotion it’s the recruiter that has to do due diligence

    • @watchreport
      @watchreport Рік тому +1

      @@lowkey621 well she wanted to be a senior partner and even bought in, until Katrina made Harvey rethink it and then goaded him into making her COO instead when she had no business degree. She didn’t deserve it and Harvey shouldn’t have given it to her. Fortunately they both left the firm in the end.

    • @SharatS
      @SharatS Рік тому +3

      @@lowkey621 well, you know what they say, people rise to their level of incompetence.

    • @lowkey621
      @lowkey621 Рік тому +2

      @@SharatS yeh I’m intending too, not there yet. Not sure if that’s good or bad🤔

  • @debrajpaul4787
    @debrajpaul4787 Рік тому +1

    I cannot understand that everything is so easy to solve and every time they find the way that they are the maker of this series....

  • @glenbradley1046
    @glenbradley1046 Рік тому +3

    That was great…… especially the “AIR RIGHTS”…..Cher pulled that one in her CABARET…….. great CHECK MATE !!!!!

  • @AvantiGiridharan
    @AvantiGiridharan Рік тому +3

    Love Suits

  • @joshnapper5206
    @joshnapper5206 22 дні тому

    And I know what we call you.
    Donna with the subtle burn

  • @effy8774
    @effy8774 Рік тому +31

    Whoever previously signed this contract from PSL had to include the validity clause in case of name change

    • @taytay8732
      @taytay8732 Рік тому

      Wasn't the name change. It was because they changed to a LLC

    • @effy8774
      @effy8774 Рік тому

      @@taytay8732 When Harvey talks to David Fox about the cleaning women he asks "will it be again a problem if we change the name?"
      Fox says him that Donna inserted the clause in the contract.
      From here I deduced that it is about the change from PSL to SL and then ZSL

  • @effy8774
    @effy8774 Рік тому +61

    This is a story on how not to capitulate in the face of a mistake, but to look for solutions and solve the problem without making compromises.

  • @obits3
    @obits3 7 місяців тому +12

    Wait, so I’m expected to believe that the guy pulling all this contract strategy doesn’t have a handle on the air rights to his properties?

    • @fashionrevolution5810
      @fashionrevolution5810 4 місяці тому +1

      😂😂😂

    • @almac9203
      @almac9203 2 місяці тому

      It wasn't his air rights but the air rights of the adjacent buildings

  • @mysteryGuySaysHi
    @mysteryGuySaysHi Рік тому +3

    we must really thank this guy because of whom zane specter litt was formed and the 3 name partners stayed in business

  • @ciuciobelo
    @ciuciobelo Рік тому +42

    Donna was, is and will be her whole life just a secretary with some small people skills. She has nothing to do with real life and business.

    • @Hannah-kk7wp
      @Hannah-kk7wp Рік тому +1

      You know she’s not a real person right…?

    • @ciuciobelo
      @ciuciobelo Рік тому

      @@Hannah-kk7wp real life meaning in the series

  • @laurabogue3503
    @laurabogue3503 3 місяці тому

    Nice job.

  • @stephengamber7000
    @stephengamber7000 3 дні тому

    Love Donna!

  • @LMays-cu2hp
    @LMays-cu2hp 8 місяців тому

    That was so nice.

  • @sahastrajitsingh2646
    @sahastrajitsingh2646 Рік тому +136

    Gotta admit, Sarah Rafferty did a great job helping viewers loathe Donna in the later seasons .

    • @Purplehaste
      @Purplehaste Рік тому +17

      the later seasons sucked anyway

    • @j.j.1517
      @j.j.1517 Рік тому +19

      Her and Harvey getting together was fucking stupid too. The last seasons of the show were brutal to watch

    • @Mrunstoppable261
      @Mrunstoppable261 Рік тому +5

      @@j.j.1517 ikr, I loved Season 8 actually, but that ending where Harvey & Donna get together...I was like bruh...and the following season 9 was one of the worst things I've seen.

    • @Legend57.
      @Legend57. Рік тому +4

      I thought I was the only one. Both Mike and donna become insufferable. Samantha wheeler is up there with them...
      After everything harvey did for mike, mike constantly spat on harveys face, went behind his back and put him in awkard positons. Donna became that annoying pop song you can't get out of your head for days on end! The constant second guessing of harvey was also one of her other unwelcomed traits.
      Personally, between mike, donna and louis, i'd rather have alex as a friend.

    • @apieceoflife2732
      @apieceoflife2732 Рік тому

      Why the Indian men are so salty about Donna's Power?😂😂

  • @calibrexdaoc
    @calibrexdaoc Рік тому +2

    So unreal of an episode/segment.

  • @thatonedog819
    @thatonedog819 Рік тому +15

    A lawsuit wouldn't send any one to prison

  • @grapelund
    @grapelund 9 місяців тому +6

    The firm was struggling with cash flow between hemorrhaging clients and having to pay Jessica her buyout money. Now out of nowhere, she buys air rights literally damn near overnight..😂😂😂

  • @carlietoway1167
    @carlietoway1167 Рік тому +2

    Justice served

  • @bagalao77
    @bagalao77 7 днів тому

    Where t coffee go?😂

  • @J_GoTTi
    @J_GoTTi Місяць тому

    You go girls!

  • @vectorm4
    @vectorm4 Рік тому +3

    He should call their bluff. Their costs to do what they threaten would far exceed the increased rent.

  • @cmj0929
    @cmj0929 Рік тому +14

    This is exactly why Donna shouldn’t have been promoted to COO in the first place, she was completely out of her depth in that position, now if she’d worked her way up over the course of a few seasos, being promoted here and there it would’ve been believable but no they just shoehorned her in and it made no sense

  • @carwashslayer4235
    @carwashslayer4235 Рік тому +55

    2:36 I love when Donna freaks out. Now they are getting evicted and they are gonna need all power and need it fast. I just have to see what the rest of the family thinks.

  • @devillonesome8648
    @devillonesome8648 Рік тому +3

    He played her 😂

  • @0tto9
    @0tto9 Рік тому +2

    Wow, just like in real life.

  • @Heisenberg69691
    @Heisenberg69691 2 місяці тому

    0:35 the coffee just disappears

  • @altimuschungus5428
    @altimuschungus5428 Рік тому +19

    You’d think her being a lawyer she would of known about the suit not being filed and also the clause in the lease, but hey… what do I know 😂😂

    • @isteal9927
      @isteal9927 Рік тому +10

      Yeah, umm, I don’t know if you watched the show, but she’s not a lawyer. She’s only a highly promoted secretary.

    • @ZaidRishard
      @ZaidRishard Рік тому +5

      @@isteal9927 Yes. But Rachel is. No?

    • @MuantanamoMobile
      @MuantanamoMobile 10 місяців тому +2

      *have

  • @christophermcqueen6230
    @christophermcqueen6230 Рік тому

    Which season was this episode in?

  • @michaeltluongo
    @michaeltluongo Рік тому +40

    It is interesting how covid makes this plot line irrelevant now when buildings are empty

    • @aryankushwaha1964
      @aryankushwaha1964 Рік тому +1

      It is new york they (people) are back

    • @campandcook3118
      @campandcook3118 Рік тому +1

      @@aryankushwaha1964 they are not back. Most office spaces are still for lease, shops and restaurants are empty too. Lots of people told their companies that they work remote most of the time or leave. They have realized that outside the city, they can work less to afford more living space.

    • @jgg204
      @jgg204 Рік тому +2

      @@aryankushwaha1964 even large investment firms are only back part time. and clients aren't coming into the office to conduct business so no one cares about the views who actually matters

  • @Loki-gq3ln
    @Loki-gq3ln 10 місяців тому

    This show is informative.. i got to google what a air right is. But made me google it. Nice...

  • @cassijohnson5130
    @cassijohnson5130 Рік тому +14

    fox has good taste in carpets

  • @darrellepickering8433
    @darrellepickering8433 Рік тому

    I repute that a judge can compel anyone to answer & for their answer to be truthful.

  • @ilcu4p
    @ilcu4p Рік тому

    He had that coming.

  • @jgg204
    @jgg204 Рік тому +11

    In real life - he would already own the air rights. This is a stupid scene

  • @johnritter7673
    @johnritter7673 Рік тому +6

    Air rights cost quite a bit of money. I'm sure Harvey would have noticed such a big accounting transaction. So it would have been much simpler just to tell him anyway

  • @bryanalexander7571
    @bryanalexander7571 Рік тому +58

    I'd have had to let them put up the billboards and remain a ridiculously rich real-estate tycoon.

    • @andrewrollout1657
      @andrewrollout1657 Рік тому +11

      If you have rando billboards outside your buildings, your highbrow tenants who enjoy elite views of the city will leave...then you won't be a rich real-estate tycoon no more.

    • @bryanalexander7571
      @bryanalexander7571 Рік тому +5

      @@andrewrollout1657
      Have you been to New York? He would have no trouble finding new tenants.

    • @jaredfrazier2216
      @jaredfrazier2216 Рік тому +9

      @@bryanalexander7571 this isnt just a apartment for rent dude lol you have no idea what youre talking about

    • @bryanalexander7571
      @bryanalexander7571 Рік тому

      @@jaredfrazier2216
      I'm so sorry. I didn't realize I was talking to a real-estate modul. I didn't realize that space in New York City is NOT at a premium or that a guy who owns thirty-whatever buildings in the city is going to have to let those buildings sit empty because of a few billboards.
      The threat was that he would lose PREMIUM tenants. The poor bastard might be forced to lease the property for three thousand dollars per square foot rather than four thousand. Do you know what three-quarters of ridiculously rich is? Ridiculously rich.
      This was an attack on his ego, not his pocket book. You're an idiot if you thought otherwise.

    • @andrewrollout1657
      @andrewrollout1657 Рік тому +3

      @@bryanalexander7571 Oh sure, he'd be able to find inferior, poorer tenants - the desperate, undiscerning kind that don't mind billboards in their view. So he'll become a less-rich real estate tycoon.

  • @MEMPHISPRAISER
    @MEMPHISPRAISER Рік тому

    Girl Power❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

  • @fckwful
    @fckwful 10 місяців тому

    0:35 Donna's coffee just disappeares....

  • @yuzhuhiko
    @yuzhuhiko Рік тому +3

    Title Shud be : Donna almost gets law firm out

  • @kathytierney3855
    @kathytierney3855 2 місяці тому

    Yacht girl, Me-again.

  • @korlimservices4180
    @korlimservices4180 11 місяців тому

    Savage 🎉

  • @stephengamber7000
    @stephengamber7000 3 дні тому

    That's how you pull a rabbit out of a hat!

  • @SajjadAhmad-cz2uj
    @SajjadAhmad-cz2uj Рік тому

    WHERE DID THE COFFEE GO?

  • @Ebizzill
    @Ebizzill 2 місяці тому

    I have no idea what happened, or what air rights means ... but hey! this was entertaining

  • @py2724
    @py2724 Рік тому

    I was like hey looks interesting... Then I saw Me-AGAIN

  • @ifechukwuprincek629
    @ifechukwuprincek629 Рік тому

    Watz d name of this tv show?

  • @SajjadAhmad-cz2uj
    @SajjadAhmad-cz2uj Рік тому

    Coffee was the first thing to evacuate the building

  • @patrickbissig3601
    @patrickbissig3601 Рік тому

    Her coffee disappeared into thin air!!

  • @lisaproustresearch
    @lisaproustresearch 9 місяців тому

    Rachel got the uk wedding dress Inspiration from donnas white dress on the first scenes

  • @ChefNourhan
    @ChefNourhan Рік тому

    Do not play dirty games with Donna that simple lol

  • @szahmad2416
    @szahmad2416 Рік тому +35

    Donna: "I need a lawsuit that sends our landlord to prison for the rest of his miserable life."
    Rachel: "Donna, calm down."
    Donna: "Also, I kissed Harvey."
    Rachel: "YOU DID WHAT???"

  • @godsm3dic577
    @godsm3dic577 10 місяців тому

    OH MY GOD!!!! Go ask for help lmfao

  • @squibkick
    @squibkick Рік тому

    Where did the cup go at the 0:35 mark, and reappear at the 0:45 mark?

  • @snsmystic
    @snsmystic Рік тому +3

    Donna has the best outfits.

  • @paulispaul1974
    @paulispaul1974 Рік тому +5

    What mentally sane person is going to believe that a lawyer acts without having fully read the contract he has with his landlord? As much as it is a fictional series, they treat their audience like they are idiots.

  • @solidmoon8266
    @solidmoon8266 Рік тому +13

    Pretty sure, acquiring evidence under duress and terminating a lease under bad faith would open that landlord to a massive lawsuit.
    Donna being able to sabotage the value of his properties does work, but if he still didn't budge, the firm could easily obliterate that landlord for everything involved and might even lose that lose building in the process.

  • @101etime
    @101etime Рік тому

    Air right in NYC sold separately from the land?

  • @nicklengyel356
    @nicklengyel356 3 місяці тому +1

    Tell Harvey

  • @ralur4287
    @ralur4287 Рік тому +7

    How do you base you biggest marketing ace on having buildings with great views, but not own any rights of said views? Was he just waiting to see who's gonna splash a snotty comercial in front of his buildings first?

  • @nonyadamnbusiness9887
    @nonyadamnbusiness9887 10 місяців тому

    That didn't hold up well. Now it's nostalgic, from back in the day when commercial and retail landlords could make demands.

  • @talhawahid8189
    @talhawahid8189 Рік тому +47

    When you live with Harvard lawyers, You become one

    • @kaynechan-li5933
      @kaynechan-li5933 Рік тому +21

      huh no...You clearly see how bad Donna messed up

    • @simone3633
      @simone3633 Рік тому +5

      Not. See how nicely he solved it

    • @deepar499
      @deepar499 Рік тому

      @@kaynechan-li5933 . Yeah

    • @kevinwang6119
      @kevinwang6119 Рік тому

      Well clearly David Fox knows how to pull every trick in the playbook possible ;)

  • @tbirdboy
    @tbirdboy 2 місяці тому

    Donna slithered outta that one. But she's so gorgeous it doesn't matter.

  • @MattyVice
    @MattyVice 28 днів тому

    Ummm, rent increases by 100% over three years? Theres no tenant step-ups that exist like that; nor can a below market lease can be that materially off from a market lease. The firm would have had to have signed the lease 15-20 yrs ago…

  • @AliHasan-gn2gm
    @AliHasan-gn2gm 21 день тому

    So many corporate professionals in the comments. I learned so much

  • @roopeshtumula3913
    @roopeshtumula3913 5 місяців тому

    Wow what a slap on his face

  • @abdullahjaber4089
    @abdullahjaber4089 Рік тому

    I'm sure she'll find a place she's a legal expert

  • @DMAneoth
    @DMAneoth Рік тому +3

    It’s a effing office!
    Move the eff out…

  • @Bennymisc
    @Bennymisc Рік тому +2

    We have the right to put tampons on your windows, because of magic. Him, ok what do you want?

  • @happynogod1646
    @happynogod1646 Рік тому

    Markel YUUUK!

  • @stephanedurette5785
    @stephanedurette5785 4 місяці тому

    Damn, if only she had an army of lawyers at her disposal...

  • @stephenfitzsimmons8837
    @stephenfitzsimmons8837 8 днів тому

    Did she eat the coffee cup in the beginning?

  • @Leo-eb1wl
    @Leo-eb1wl 4 дні тому

    Buying air rights to 38 buildings in Manhattan would cost 100’s of millions of dollars and would require many landlords who own the existing air rights to want to sell them, and air rights must be transferred to adjacent buildings, so you can’t just buy air rights without actually owning a building to have them transferred to.
    The level of stupidity in this scene is phenomenal.