Dark Matter Night with Katie Mack and Ken Clark
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 жов 2022
- Take a guided tour of the invisible universe on Dark Matter Night.
On October 26, dark matter researchers Katie Mack and Ken Clark shared insights into the ubiquitous, mysterious matter that makes up the majority of stuff in our universe.
Dark Matter Night was a live webcast brought to you by Perimeter Institute and the McDonald Institute. Starting off the evening, Katie Mack discussed the theoretical and observational foundations of dark matter at Perimeter Institute, where she holds the Hawking Chair in Cosmology and Science Communication. Next, Ken Clark, an associate professor at the Arthur B. McDonald Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research Institute, shared experimental approaches that could help solve the riddle of dark matter. We also got a guided video tour of SNOLAB, the state-of-the-art underground laboratory two kilometres beneath Sudbury.
Dark Matter Night is one of many ways you can explore the topic -- find lots more at www.interactions.org/dark-mat...
Perimeter Institute (charitable registration number 88981 4323 RR0001) is the world’s largest independent research hub devoted to theoretical physics, created to foster breakthroughs in the fundamental understanding of our universe, from the smallest particles to the entire cosmos. The Perimeter Institute Public Lecture Series is made possible in part by the support of donors like you. Be part of the equation: perimeterinstitute.ca/donate
Subscribe for updates on future webcasts, events, free posters, and more: insidetheperimeter.ca/newslet...
/ pioutreach
/ perimeter
/ perimeterinstitute
/ perimeter-institute - Наука та технологія
Every time i listen to (or read) on dark matter, I always hope I will hear something new, even just a tiny new clue, idea or anything. Nothing .. for the last ten years. We really might need a Superman to shine some real light on it.
Honestly, yes. At this point, I don’t think any of this dark matter/energy is actual a new type of matter or energy in the literal sense. I think it represents some sort of deeper structure of reality underneath what we know that we don’t understand yet.
New lecture from Perimeter Institute proposes neutrinos with opposite chirality to be dark matter. Fascinating
Thank you for uploading these amazing lectures!
This is a fascinating video. I've heard and read about these detectors but now I have a small inkling of how they actually work. It might be worth pointing out that no result is a result in itself. It tells us how likely/unlikely an interaction is or that we either need more sensitivity or completely different detection methods! Good luck!
Novel Dark Matter Hypothesis
Dark Matter is simply unaccounted for gravity. GR states that gravity is the consequence of the curvature of spacetime. Is it possible that the structure of spacetime itself could be warped without the presence of mass? Spacetime has been shown to react like a fabric by warping, twisting, and propagating independently of mass, and all have been proven with observations from gravitational lensing, frame dragging, and now gravitational waves! Fabrics can be stretched, pressured, and/or heated to the point of causing a deformation and losing its elastic nature. All of these conditions were extreme during inflation, so it is plausible that the “fabric” of spacetime analog could extend having its elastic property have hit a yield point?
Therefore, if gravity is strictly the consequence of the warped of spacetime, and fabrics can be permanently overstretched, then those empty warped geodesics would create gravitational wells independent of mass. My hypothesis of DM is subatomic black hole imprints of the quantum fluctuations that popped in at the moment of inflation. The CMB shows where the hot dense regions were they created the galaxies. They would have been the initial cause and location of the warping. These imprints would be clouds of quantum sized floating fixed geodesics, so they couldn’t expand or evaporate. Perhaps nothing has been detected because there is nothing to detect. GR wouldn’t require modification because DM would just be an extension of how spacetime behaves at extreme conditions. No MOND, no WIMPs, and no parallel universes, just empty spacetime deformations that produce gravitational wells to help jump start galaxy accretion processes. Zwicky may have named is Missing Mass correctly since he detected some gravity without mass present to cause it…
Black matter and energy has been added to the field equation to sustains observations. Field équations are motionless, spinless, torqueless etc according to the knowledge of that time.
Elysabeth Rauscher then added spin, torque, coriolis effect in field équations and what happen, no more need of black stuff to sustains galaxies spinning and expansion energy among other things.
For my humble pov never forget to make things spinning.
MOND should get more funding.
I really enjoyed this video. I wish I could have been there to ask a few questions about dark matter. These questions might be silly as I have no background in science, it’s just an interest. But here they are:
1. Could dark matter act as a kind of cosmological “glue”, keeping the universal expansion more or less evenly distributed and consistent. Would this explain the even rotation of stars in galaxies, both close to the centre and along the edges? Or allow ghost galaxies to maintain their shape when influenced by much larger galaxies near by?
2. If dark matter cannot be explained using the standard model, is it possible that the explanation of dark matter could introduce a whole new law of physics as we know it. If it constitutes such a large percentage of our known universe, does it necessarily have to abide by the laws of physics that scientist have determined from the 5% of matter that we actually can observe (ie. stars, planets, black holes..)?
3. Could dark matter introduce a new fundamental state of matter?
4. Lastly, could the evidence of dark matter be used in the simulation hypothesis? If our universe is a simulation, are we ever meant to know this? Was dark matter placed in our simulation to be a problem that we can never solve. It cannot be explained with our current understanding of physics because it doesn’t abide by those rules. Was dark matter placed there to keep us just out of reach of fully understanding our universe. Could the understanding of dark matter mean the end of the simulation?
Dark matter is just a type of particle that doesn't interact with light (electromagnetism).
The concept of transparent matter is nothing new. Our everyday lives are full of nearly-transparent items, like glass, air, and water. Dark matter just takes that transparency all the way to 100%.
That last question got me.
The kid's question (1:17:17) is priceless.. Kind of, does the king really wear any clothes?
Today I happened to see a video on animal behaviors, where in a herd of livestock, (cattle, sheep), or wildlife like elk or reindeer, are sometimes moving while they rotate in a circular pattern around a central point, and are evenly spread apart to the outside perimeters... This reminded me of Katie's video clip of galaxy cluster rotation around it's core center... It is very similar to her graphics and I urge you to check out videos of, or research on animal herds circling about a central location... it's uncannily interesting in it's similar attributes.
No one laughed at Ken's jokes completely missed. I appreciate Ken cuz he's doing the small stuff really neat small stuff to detect what ever Maybe it's almost homeless. I would love to be able to manufacture produce invent or machine the gadgets and instruments he is showing us. Design. I won't cry about it
Hello. Direct experiment does not confirm the constancy of the speed of light. The error is reduced if the Michelson-Morley experiment uses light with a wavelength of "cm" and determines the speed of the train in the train, relative to the DGF - the Dominant gravitational field of the Earth. Thus, Einstein's mental experience can be realized.
I appreciate ans. to this question, where does PLASMA fit in your Sub-atomic (particles) representation, is it NeutronIC, protonIC or electronIC?
I have heard presentations that say something like "MATTER in state of PLASMA".
It's matter that been ionized by an energizing process, which could be described as boiling off at least the most weakly bound electrons from atoms, then typically letting it all sit together in a sort of vaporous electromagnetic "soup" while the boiled-off electrons remain too kinetically active ("hot") for recombination.
@@CACBCCCU Thank you very much. So Could I conclude that Deuterium and Tritium Plasmas have lost there one and only Electron that they had?
@@semorgh2854 Yes, but I tend to think of plasma as lacking a net charge, so I tend to think of deuterium and tritium plasma as a 50/50 mix of nuclei and unbound electrons flying around and through them and so I would say you've more specifically implied a "completely ionized plasma" in many situations, but that is largely my preference. I suppose that for some length of time there is a recoverable sharing of flux lines referred to as entanglement, and in an insulated plasma internal entanglements could be re-shuffled. in a fusion reactor I suppose the walls are positively charged thus all that is supported by the apparatus are the nuclei while the electrons are lost to the conductive walls. In any case, you're welcome.
@@CACBCCCU Thank you. It seems to me you are very knowledgeable person, and before my next question , I found this statement of yours extremely Interesting which is: "I suppose that for some length of time there is a recoverable sharing of flux lines referred to as entanglement". --------------My next question is: have you heard of "Mehran Tavakoli Keshe" he is a nuclear engineer? and if you have heard of him what is your opinion about him.
@@semorgh2854 I'd suggest good credentials are a good place to start for the teacher you are seeking.
Dark matter was recently measured to fall between an electron and proton in mass. May I suggest we simply split the difference? I suggest that dark matter is amorphous atomic hydrogen. Hydrogen without stable orbital electron. Which therfore can't emit or absorb photons.
The product of neutron decay in the supragalactic deep voids.
Where did the Neutrons come from?
These are the Neutrons which a Planck second ago contacted some event horizon.
neutron decay cosmology
How can you measure mass of super fluid while you are submerged in it and made up of the same...?
This is the answer. Thermodynamics and fluid mechanics are the fundamental forces of the universe.
It is every living person's responsibility to make the case for truth in labelling and natural probabilistic uncertainty, ie what, how and why things happen as they do, continuously created potential possibilities. Logically truth is "light" and dark is uncertain except as it is measurable as time duration timing modulation, manifestation of vertically integrated harmonic frequencies that can be subjected to String Theoretical Calculus, Vibration Analysis.
(Check the Susskind school of thought experiments)
Everything only looks at it magically showing up, and it has been hanging around as it is for 5-10 billion years with little change. And ignore the first 500 million or billion years when everything was randomly dispersed over a billion light years of volume. Some gravitational attraction gathered this material over the vastness of space with some gravitational attraction, dark matter followed that matter into this attraction just like the matter. Then it parks in the goldilocks location at 1 billion years and no longer no longer acts like matter for the next 5-10 billion years, aka it doesn't bunch up in the center like the matter. I think it is the gravitational pressure (the space time particles) at the background level, matter is generating and sends the energized spacetime material all the time, it is what causes space time warpage locally and gravity. Outside the galaxy you get the Hubble expansion pressure that is significantly lower than the galaxy background pressure, these pressures have to mix and normalize at the edge of the galaxy and if it is a big enough difference, you will get a noticeable warpage of time space or standing waves.
FROM BRAZIL... CONGRATULATIONS
Hello I haven't got halfway through this. But from what I understand the reason that there must be dark matter is to account for the ways galaxies rotate and the dark matter I would assume effects the Galaxy because of its mass or gravity gravitational attraction to the rest of the Galaxy is this correct? Dark Matter Dark Matter Ben's light it affects the Galaxy through its mass or gravity but at the same time you you said it doesn't interact with any mass in its vicinity I don't understand. If it doesn't affect mass regular Mass in this vicinity how can it affect the Dynamics of a galaxy. When you said the outer mass of a galaxy moves at the same speed as everything inside are you talking about angular speed and if so why would this be a dilemma an issue and anomaly? If the outer Mass had centripetal force held together by a long string toward the galactic center this can be analogous by all the mass between the mass of the outer Galaxy and The galactic center there would be a larger gravitational attraction or acceleration at the edges of the Galaxy toward the center of the Galaxy as opposed to matter closer to the galactic center. Do I need to go any further?
It's a dilemma because the outer stars appear to be orbiting a much bigger mass than the inner stars. This implies lots of invisible mass between the inner and outer stars.
@@KevinSterns Saturn and Jupiter Our Father away from the Sun than Mercury and Venus are.
@@KevinSterns also I have more pizza near the crust than I do at the tip.
@@KevinSterns how does this appearance manifest itself?
Stars in the outter part of galaxies are moving just as fast as near the galactic center. Which there isn't enough baryonic matter to account for the speed at which they're moving, they should be getting thrown out of the galaxy, but they're not.
Why this stubborn insistence that it's a new particle? No mention of interacting with Gravitons here, how about Holographic effects of emergent space?
If you can control matter you can lower the sky for everyone to see it to ✋🏿☁️☁️☁️
Dark matter/energy exists?
Not convinced.
I think equations of GRAVITY is missing needed adjustments.
If I were to guess I would say dark matter and black holes are the same stuff has anyone proven that the things get too heavy it'll all collapse that is at what point and why would regular matter ever collapse under immense or large enough gravitational force have we seen this has it been witnessed has it been observed. Cuz I would conjecture most of this black hole observation and dark matter hypothesis and observation is merely extremely large massive regular matter who's gravitational attraction is so strong and it's proximity to other stuff it's so remote that any light from this regular dark matter or black hole is decelerated to the point it doesn't reach our eyes on Earth. Simple? So in the Newtonian review if you will allow me it's not force of gravity it's the acceleration due to gravity that affects light. Now this is a real stretch I was reading someone's thoughts that it the speed of light that varies as the wavelength is is somehow I constant I also listened or red that the light behind debris is blurred as I understand this it is blurred as a function of frequencies somehow you can see the the blur would be explained by different speeds of light as it's directly related to frequency in this scenario. If different frequencies of light are traveling at different speeds than they would bend different amounts around Mass in its way towards Earth and would cause a blur. And the speed would be directly proportional to the frequency. This idea of a constant wavelength of light is extremely radical to the point of laughability I understand. I have also thought as in a double slit experiment that specifically electrons have an oscillating magnitude of electric field as it moves relative to an object I don't have details . you may see how this may work in terms of what debroglie observed or deduced in his three paged paper.
I believe ' Dark Matter ' is a cloud of incredibly small negatively charged monopole particles called ' Harveytrons ', that fill every available space between the nucleus and the boundary of the atom, and every available empty space throught the universe. The negativ force of repulsion it produces due to all of these particles trying to repel each other in every dirrection, is the ' Dark Energy ', and is one of the two forces of gravity, which I believe is a force of both attraction and repulsion.
I hypothesize that everything in the universe is composed of just two incredibly small particles that I have proposed.
One is a negatively charged monopole particle called a ' Harveytron ', which fills every available empty space between the nucleus and the boundary of the atom, and every available empty space throughout the universe, in a cloud called the ' Harveytron Cloud '.
These particles make up the ' Dark Matter ', and the negative force of repulsion that is produced by them trying to repel each other in every direction, is the ' Dark Energy '. This is the force that keeps all of the planets suspended, and stops them from being drawn to each other, and is what is causing the expansion of the universe ( if it is ). It is also one of the forces of gravity, which I believe is a force of both attraction and repulsion.
The second, is a corresponding positively charged monopole particle, called a ' Dannytron ', which, in combination with the ' Harveytrons ', make up all of the nuclei and therefore all of the nuclear matter in the universe. They are what makes up the other force of gravitational attraction between the nuclear matter of the universe. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.
Where's charge fit in, the literature claims it's a property of those 2 "particles" you assert compose masses.
I disagree, and assert charge is a fluid under the conditions of a BigBang that by division with neutrinos the ammo creates electron_positron pairs from work by Sternglass-Einstein who used dynamic property equations to establish these pairs can form subatomic structures as 1st condensates, and, if work to discover other "particles" that can be formed is ever done, it'll be fun ⚛️
A charge has three states, + - & neutral, funny things on down to quarks have these 3.
Cheers 🍺
@@ttmallardHello Tom, thank you for your reply. You are entitled to your view, as is everyone, however, what you believe is miles away from my view, for a number of reasons. First, I do not believe in the big bang, and it is my belief that with my hypothesis, I can prove categorically the theory is wrong. Secondly, I do not agree with the standard model's table of particles, I believe that they are all man-made, and are just varying sizes of atomic matter broken off of atoms, during collider collisions. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.
@@tonymarshharveytron1970 Explain how electrons & their perfect opposite are formed with your theory, we'll see about your assertion of no bangs occur how you reply, thx.
@@ttmallard Hello Tom, thanks for the reply. Obviously, without seeing the complete hypothesis, it is not easy to appreciate how my hypothesis works. In reply to your question, I have just copied a section from my hypothesis relating to my view of the electron, which accords whith obsevations far better than the standard model. Take a look, and give me your thoughts. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.
Alternative Hypothesis.
Electron.
It is proposed that the accepted view, that an electron is an elementary solid particle, is incorrect, and that it is in fact a collection of the much smaller negatively charged monopole particles that I have just described as ‘ Harveytrons ‘. I believe that these particles would be the finitely smallest particles in the universe, and would constitute everything that exists in the universe, with the exception of the positively charge component contained in every nucleus that exists. Also I propose that these particles would form a cloud ‘, the ‘ Harveytron ‘ cloud, that fills every available empty space within the atom and the universe.
Just to emphasize the point, I believe that the electron, as a solid particle does not exist.
It is proposed that the electron as it is described in the standard model, is in fact a parcel of the much smaller negatively charged monopole ’ Harveytron ‘ particles described in my hypothesis, and is the quantity of negatively charged particles to be contained together, before the charge they contain is released as a Photon, or as a pulse of energy outside the spectrum of visible light. This quantity of charge is a constant, throughout the whole of the universe,and is the quantity of charge contained in a quanta of light or electromagnetic radiation, when the threshold quantity of charge able to be held within the boundary of the atom is reached.
This is analogous to an electrical circuit, containing a power source, a capacitor, and an SCR, whereby, when power is applied to the circuit, the capacitor begins to charge, until the trigger voltage of the SCR is reached and it fires, at which point the capacitor discharges in a pulse.
The way that these clusters form, is due to the interaction between the opposing positive and negative forces in the nucleus and any external force applied to the atom pushing the negative particles up to the point where the pressure cannot be contained by the atom, and the energy contained in these bunched particles is released to the adjoining atom. The quantity of negative charge surrounding each nucleus, is strongest nearest the nucleus, and gets weaker the greater the distance from the nucleus. At the point where the force of attraction to this charge from the nucleus reaches equilibrium with the force of repulsion between the negatively charged monopoles is reached, this is the boundary of the atom. This is also the boundary that the positive charge forming the strong nuclear force extends to. From this point out, there only exists the negative force of repulsion in every direction in the ‘ Harveytron Cloud ‘.
I contend that the whole of the available empty space within the boundary of the atom, as described in the standard model, is filled with these particles, and the amount of negative electrical charge equal and opposite to the positive charge carried by the nucleus, attributed to the electrons, as described in the standard model, is distributed throughout the mass of these particles.
The negative electrical charge that would be carried by the electron in the standard model is in fact, just a small proportion of these particles, and of the negative charge within the area surrounding the nucleus and the outer boundary of the atom. I also hypothesize that these particles do not fly around at speed, but are at rest unless exited by an external force, other than trying to get closer to the positively charged particles contained in the nucleus, and contributing to the strong nuclear force.
Beyond the last layer of the positively charged monopole ‘ Dannytron ‘ particles forming the nucleus, as I will describe later, there are only the negatively charged monopole ‘ Harveytron ‘ particles in a cloud that encompasses every space within the universe. This cloud is negatively charged, and forms a negative force of repulsion exerting a repulsive force in every direction.
As these negatively charged particles cluster around the nucleus, they are held very strongly by the positively charged particles making up the nucleus. As the positive and negative particles are monopoles that do not give up their force of attraction and repulsion, there exists a complex interaction between these particles in the nucleus. The attractive and repulsive force of each particle, extends through adjoining particles. Although the negatively charged particles are trying to repel each other, this repulsion is a standard pressure in the ‘ Harvetron Cloud ‘. However, because the positively charged particles are trying to attract the negative particles from every direction, and their force of attraction extends beyond the boundary of their neighbouring oppositely charged particle , there is in effect, a double force pulling and pushing the nucleus extremely tightly together. This is the ‘ Strong Nuclear Force ‘.
As more negatively charged particles try to get to the nucleus, a dense shell of the negatively charged particles forms due to the very strong attraction of the positive particles in the nucleus. As these negatively charged monopole particles can’t get any closer to the nucleus, this is the boundary of the atom. From this point out, there exists only the negative force of repulsion, and equilibrium is reached in the ‘ Harveytron Cloud ‘.
The negative force of attraction to the nucleus gets weaker the greater the distance from the nucleus until the force reaches equilibrium within the cloud, to become the weak force, and a constituent of gravity.
At the point where the boundary of the atom would be defined, it is possible that the negatively charged monopole particles, might bunch up, as they are being pulled by the positive particles in the nucleus, but also being repelled by the negative particles already in this region. This could be what is visualized as an electron. Any applied force would then cause the energy contained in these bunches, to be released as a photon.
@@tonymarshharveytron1970 I was replying to the hydrogen video here, apology, now I get it. So, a view of extraction-to-production for decent torque. EV & EAV use copper, magnets use cobalts, the ore bodies more common than lithium, less than bauxite the longevity of practical flux not so important as working in repulsion a need for motors.
By controlling wattage electric motors could use aluminum_wire, the megawatt genset superconducts coils, wasteheat for baseload huge vs none/Mwh.
Using gap controls all_magnet motors, usually by squeezing together, with a physical governor to prevent runaway unloaded.
Your work is great, I'm trying to open design doors to add to the green scene 🍺
📍1:03:35
I skipped ahead to this point incase there was something interesting. Nothing there. Anybody referring to an isolated underground bunker as something cool is weird. Reminds me of Tom Sawyer talking his friends into whitewashing a fence.
Hopefully physics graduates don't waste their lives looking for dark matter in holes in the ground. Please wake up and see the obvious.
You find dark matter in space. It's NOT distributed evenly. Probably very little in our solar system so chances of finding dark matter underground are slim to none.
I just waiting for the U.S Government to let me show the planet how I can level a city to put peace on the planet 🌎 stop bad people
Never lose an opportunity to go woke. At least she knows it is an astrophysical presentation.
Inconceivable
Hello Katie and Ken, with the greatest respect, I believe that the identity of ' Dark Matter ' has been staring us in the face , but we just havent looked in the right place. This is because I believe ' Dark Matter ' makes up everything in the universe.
I have been working on an hypothesis, which explains how ' Dark Matter ' works, and have tried to get this hypothesis looked at by pofessors at various universities, and in comments on ' UA-cam ' videos such as this, but no-one has replied to me. I have also composed an hypothesis, that proves conclusively that the 'Big Bang ' theory is wrong.
I would be happy to send you a copy of these in an attachment to an email, if you were interested. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.
MOND should be studied as an appeal to necessarily unwordy vote-rrhoidal robotic amateur propagandists to join in ganging together naturally over the proper framework niche to royally rig up in order to sustain general relativity in all of its fabulous Disneyland fast wormhole meta-spookiness while burying it at the same time thus satisfying an overriding glorious long-felt national semi-need to have everything both ways.
Look instead for strong statistical clustering expressing wavelike integrality in the sizes of placid elliptical galaxies. Adapt Dirac's LNH to explaining gravity dipole rotation so every placid spiral galaxy fits the profile of expressing a single concentric toroidal shaped spinning spatial-domain wavelet accentuating the spin in cool-matter-focused frame drag, but that's a little too anti-Disneyland I'd say. Adding logarithms, 10 to the -15th meters is standard proton interaction cross section, upscale it by the ratio of charge and mass effects between protons, 10 to the 36th power to obtain the best frame to contain a spinning wave-spacing expressed by such galaxies (ten to the 21st power meters or 30 kpc, or 100,000 light years, half that for natural continuous spin 2 carrier pairs), and how dark matter effect gravity is involved, simultaneously. In multiplying a distance by a force, a torque and a balanceable rotational energy is described, among other things. Unifying torque horizons in spinning charge and matter particles by noting that ...
the charge-effect of a proton multiplied by the cross section of said proton closely matches the mass effect of said proton multiplied by the diameter of a typical spiral...
... which lets one jump directly from observing ubiquitous low energy hydrogen spin effects dominated by kinetically- and quantumly- spinning cooled hydrogen nuclei to observing low energy ubiquitous wavelike systems dominated mass-wise by said cooled hydrogen, namely spiral galaxies. If you think it's a coincidence, not momentous, that is sadly your loss or a failing of heritage. One hundred thousand light years was for the longest time a commonly cited figure for the most apparent size of the Milky Way.
An alt cosmology can explain a portion of dark matter based upon Sternglass-Einstein papers on finding a named meson from their eqa's in the lab.
Novel, a structure from bound electron-positron pairs that emit the energy_of_annihilation with slow decay. How to make such perfectly opposite "basic particles" ?
As 1st condensates after a BigBang from a neutrino hitting a charge fluid that's neutral whole, spins off quantum particles using the energy lost to velocity & viscosity equalling annihilation.
The implications:
Explains late term inflation as these age & decay.
A single pair are neutral relates to dark matter.
From bang to stasis/contraction this needs a new view, that charge is a fluid basic mass, not a property.
Further, it's neutral whole, split becomes basic charged "particle", the papers expose a need for scale, a fluid implies smaller pieces, they also 3-states down to quarks.
This organizes by allowing charge to exist to components of atoms, the neutron a circulation so stable of repellent charge ?
There's something worthy to it so far.
💥⚛️ ... ✨️
Wearing a mask almost 2023 ? Something is wrong. Maybe there's more than 2 bathrooms available 🤔
Almost as weird as looking underground for dark matter. If our solar system had any significant amount of dark matter it would affect the orbit of the planets. It doesn't so this field is probably a rat hole waste of money.
Very unprofessional for them to be doing this. Ended up skipping the video.
Made me think old 2020 clip, but noooooo
@@philswede Remember these are the people teaching our kids at universities. Kind of scary. No wonder college graduates are FUBAR.
They are in Canada. US laws and conspiracy theories do not apply
Is anyone going to clean the plague rats out of these comments?
I decided to not be bothered by all. the mask and watch. Here is what I posit: perhaps the dark energy is the source of matter in a genesis in which our understanding is lacking. It would be a process in which energy is not applied to the system, but is generated. By the way, what is the boundaries of our universe?
Don't hurt yourself kid a quote I believe from the Pixar movie Finding Nemo
Dark matter and dark energy are scientism’s name for Chi or Ki
Why are the people on the stage wearing face mask?. There is no way to stay close to anybody...
Why do you care sir?
@@caspernetherlands698 because wonder why is the basis of science
Exactly. It's why I have no interest in what they have to say. None of this material is new anyways. Can't stand to listen to this material muffled. I wouldn't give any of these idiots grant money.
@@caspernetherlands698 Because this is first thing everybody notices. Very odd today unless you're completely brainwashed.
😷 because they're all woke. soon to be crying in 2024.
Dark matter is a huge mistake in physics. It is used when the laws of motion and general relativity are unable to explain the motion of a star or galaxy. Dark matter doesn't affect the motion of small bodies or young bodies like the young star S-02 or young diffuse galaxies. It only affects the motion and orbits of old bodies like the sun, old satellite galaxies and our old Milky Way galaxy. Thus dark matter is not homogenous throughout the universe.
Dark matter is a mistake. The motion pinned on dark matter is not caused by missing mass. The unexplained motion is an extremely small acceleration that only occurs to large bodies radiating a constant stiff solar wind. This mysterious motion doesn't happen to young bodies, planets, moons and other small bodies like asteroids and comets not radiating solar winds.
But physicists, astrophysicists and cosmologists are so lost they don't know how to solve it, so what can they do except follow and agree with all the other ignorant scientists.
Do the math. This acceleration amounts to 0.0000002007 in/s. It's about twice the width of a proton every second. The motion turns out to be a perfect 10,000 :1 ratio between age and velocity. The older the star or galaxy is the more momentum they would have acquired over their lifetime. It was so easy to determine. I'm a retired professional 3D AIA CADD architect. I was able to easily figured out what was causing the mysterious motion. It's referred to as ion propulsion. Stars and galaxies slowly propel themselves over their lifetimes. They are not being pulled along by dark matter particles! How stupid! Many of the so called expert scientists in my opinion are totally incompetent.
Presentation is so long it turns me off. Correctness has gone too far.
Perimeter Institute. The free thinkers that immediately delete comments that question their motives. Can I withdraw my tax dollars?
I can't take this presentation seriously when the first person at the podium is wearing a mask. I'm interested in the topic, but have no confidence in the integrity of the "science" when presenters are acting in a way that is not backed up by science, i.e. wearing masks.
Why the masks?
Cant watch a scientist in a mask alone
this would be a lot easier to watch if you people weren't so woke
Fuzzy speach
Masks on stage almost 2023.
ZzzZzzzZzz
I watched 2 minutes of them all wearing masks, and I clicked off.
I couldn’t understand a word they were saying because of those masks. 😆
Do I need to wear a mask to watch this video?