I can't send a photo of this place it was on one of the properties my family owned in the Kimberly "Bedford downs" It looks like a old volcano or something could you have a look and give me some ideas Regards Mark
Sounds like it was a comet mostly composed of water but with other minerals and debris in it. The heat of reentry changed the ice to steam, causing a huge explosion. Although nuke experts may understand this better than I. It would have been huge and shook the earth surface greatly and atmosphere. Leaving mostly water vapor and dust... and destruction.
Your impact animation at 10:02 needs a fix. The Sudbury Basin is actually several hundred miles to the north-east. You have the Sudbury Impact hitting well west of Lake Michigan, maybe somewhere in Minnesota, Wisconsin or maybe Iowa.
The first scientific studied airburst event. An amazing story. You must be young to not hear of this event. Impacts information can be found on various sites, and they usually include major airbursts. New biggest impact found in Australia too.
That first description eyewitness description you should sync up to the Chelabinsk meteorite explosion over Russia just a few years ago and sync that narrative up with the pictures and the videos of the exploding windows and the shockwaves and the Sonic booms and the trail I think it might be interesting to see what it might have fought looked like you know at a distance for the people that were living in that area at the time in 1908.
G'day, thanks for that information l have always wondered if another asteroid impacts will hit the Earth, and what the aftermath would be like, thanks again, cheers mate, Neil 🤠.
Hi, what about this impacter: ua-cam.com/video/5IuwLLbmDOM/v-deo.html The burning and tsunami wrecking of the Chinese fleet off New Zealand/Australia. This guy covers historical accounts, and lots of evidence here is in Australia, even one tsunami wreck in Victoria. One in South Western Australia. Which probably gives a direction, from occlusion. Where is the impact creator?
Thanks to geologists we think that all living beings on our planet Earth have the most to fear from an asteroid impact or volcano eruptions. But when we look at the many horizontal layers that we find everywhere on our planet, we clearly see the effect of a repeating cataclysm. These disasters are mentioned in ancient books like the Mahabharata from India and the Popol Vuh from the Maya and others. They tell us about a cycle of seven disasters. Certainly, a cycle of regularly recurring global disasters cannot be caused by asteroid impacts or volcanic eruptions. The only possible cause is another celestial body, a planet, orbiting our sun in an eccentric orbit. Then it is close to the sun for a short period and after the crossing at a very high speed it disappears into the universe for a long time. Planet 9 exists, but it seems invisible. These disasters cause a huge tidal wave of seawater that washes over land "above the highest mountains." At the end it covers the earth with a layer of wet mud, a mixture of sand, clay, lime, fossils of marine and terrestrial animals and small and larger meteorites. The Northern hemisphere is covered with a layer of ice that fell down "in blocks as great as mountains". These disasters also create a cycle of civilizations. To learn much more about the recurring flood cycle, the re-creation of civilizations and its timeline and ancient high technology, read the e-book: "Planet 9 = Nibiru". It can be read on any computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: invisible nibiru 9
I have to take issue with your assertion that a 6-9 mile wide asteroid impact 'literally sterilises everything', as it literally doesn't, otherwise I wouldn't be here to take issue with said assertion.
The Deniliquin impact seems to be the latest news mate. I contacted Dr A. Glikson (?). At one point about a possible even larger ancient impact crater in Australia. Magnetic anomaly maps I've been studying seem to show an ancient large impact structure that could, in my opinion, account for strewn fields and the centre structure has been eroded. It may even be covered by some later impacts. Would love to get in touch and see if my idea is sound or not. You seem like someone i can listen to and learn. Cheers from Queensland 😊
just a heads up the Chesapeake Bay is not called cheese a peek Bay there's no cheese in it it's chefs as in CAESS APEAK that's how it's pronounced shut up peak there's no cheese in it it's not your fault that's how it's spelled And it's badly pronounced here in the Americas but it is formally called Chesapeake CHESSAPEAK Here's a peek. just a bit of advice when you're selling a foreign names you can check on youtube for pronunciation most of the pronunciations are correct But occasionally their crap and people know that in the comments so double check to be in the safe side or ask Google how do I pronounce cheese and peek. it's a little reminder to check beams before you try and pronounce them make sure you've got them being pronounced correctly for the region the country or the world the local variations for nameplaces and making sure that it sounds right to you and to other people. of not you have a great day.
I can't help but laugh when foreign tourists come to visit our city of Perth Western Australia...and of course Fremantle with it's smaller city "Cockburn" to the south.😂
@MJC22.03 I m laughing along with you. Dont forget Albany. Its always mispronounced too. We have some of the funniest names here according to the tourists, both from over east and over seas and thats not even counting the indigenous names
1:06 This and the following ones are bad visualisations . A bollide does not become incandescent until it reaches the atmosphere and in this visualisation it starts becoming incandescent hundreds , possibly thousands of kilometers too soon. 7:24 this one is much more accurate
Yes, no. Have you witnessed this size object enter the atmosphere from that point of reference?? No. So although I do think "1.06 is wrong, or 7.24 looks more realistic" neither of us can say so definitively. 😊
@@logic.and.reasoning In these simulations the earth's size and the thickness of the atmosphere is never to scale. If it was to scale the atmosphere would be a very thin layer over the surface. It is generally accepted that meteoroids begin to glow at the Kármán line (100 km) and larger objects below that. On a large desk globe (diameter ~ 500 mm) , the Kármán line would be about 0.7 mm above the surface
Mate its like your channel has been nuked.
How come so few views ect?
Probably because what he says goes against the official narrative?
Tube nazis are watching everything. lol
I can't send a photo of this place it was on one of the properties my family owned in the Kimberly
"Bedford downs"
It looks like a old volcano or something could you have a look and give me some ideas
Regards Mark
Sounds like it was a comet mostly composed of water but with other minerals and debris in it. The heat of reentry changed the ice to steam, causing a huge explosion. Although nuke experts may understand this better than I. It would have been huge and shook the earth surface greatly and atmosphere. Leaving mostly water vapor and dust... and destruction.
Fascinating and informative as always.
Your impact animation at 10:02 needs a fix. The Sudbury Basin is actually several hundred miles to the north-east. You have the Sudbury Impact hitting well west of Lake Michigan, maybe somewhere in Minnesota, Wisconsin or maybe Iowa.
I grew up on the Chesapeake, but didn’t know about this impact until just a few years ago.
Ive never heard that Tunguska account before, excellent piece of information 👍
Thank you. Great vid as always
have you been watching the channel long?
The first scientific studied airburst event. An amazing story. You must be young to not hear of this event. Impacts information can be found on various sites, and they usually include major airbursts. New biggest impact found in Australia too.
@@logic.and.reasoning my point was, if he watches this channel he should have already seen this segment. As this is a repackaged reupload
That first description eyewitness description you should sync up to the Chelabinsk meteorite explosion over Russia just a few years ago and sync that narrative up with the pictures and the videos of the exploding windows and the shockwaves and the Sonic booms and the trail I think it might be interesting to see what it might have fought looked like you know at a distance for the people that were living in that area at the time in 1908.
It wouldn't have been the same look. There was no city or town only nomadic groups of reindeer herders, and a few trading stores
G'day, thanks for that information l have always wondered if another asteroid impacts will hit the Earth, and what the aftermath would be like, thanks again, cheers mate, Neil 🤠.
Small impacts actually occur regularly. It’s not a matter of “if”, but “when” a larger bolide will strike.
There is apparently a large number of late Devonian impacts. Preservation bias?
Hi, what about this impacter:
ua-cam.com/video/5IuwLLbmDOM/v-deo.html
The burning and tsunami wrecking of the Chinese fleet off New Zealand/Australia. This guy covers historical accounts, and lots of evidence here is in Australia, even one tsunami wreck in Victoria. One in South Western Australia. Which probably gives a direction, from occlusion.
Where is the impact creator?
Thanks to geologists we think that all living beings on our planet Earth have the most to fear from an asteroid impact or volcano eruptions. But when we look at the many horizontal layers that we find everywhere on our planet, we clearly see the effect of a repeating cataclysm. These disasters are mentioned in ancient books like the Mahabharata from India and the Popol Vuh from the Maya and others. They tell us about a cycle of seven disasters. Certainly, a cycle of regularly recurring global disasters cannot be caused by asteroid impacts or volcanic eruptions. The only possible cause is another celestial body, a planet, orbiting our sun in an eccentric orbit. Then it is close to the sun for a short period and after the crossing at a very high speed it disappears into the universe for a long time. Planet 9 exists, but it seems invisible. These disasters cause a huge tidal wave of seawater that washes over land "above the highest mountains." At the end it covers the earth with a layer of wet mud, a mixture of sand, clay, lime, fossils of marine and terrestrial animals and small and larger meteorites. The Northern hemisphere is covered with a layer of ice that fell down "in blocks as great as mountains". These disasters also create a cycle of civilizations. To learn much more about the recurring flood cycle, the re-creation of civilizations and its timeline and ancient high technology, read the e-book: "Planet 9 = Nibiru". It can be read on any computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: invisible nibiru 9
The one that blew up over Russia in 2013....
Another rock zipped under our satellites the day before...
We always needs friends....
Tell me more about this Cheese-a-peak Bay.
He is speaking Strine, please use Google translate 😅
I have to take issue with your assertion that a 6-9 mile wide asteroid impact 'literally sterilises everything', as it literally doesn't, otherwise I wouldn't be here to take issue with said assertion.
The Deniliquin impact seems to be the latest news mate. I contacted Dr A. Glikson (?). At one point about a possible even larger ancient impact crater in Australia. Magnetic anomaly maps I've been studying seem to show an ancient large impact structure that could, in my opinion, account for strewn fields and the centre structure has been eroded. It may even be covered by some later impacts. Would love to get in touch and see if my idea is sound or not. You seem like someone i can listen to and learn. Cheers from Queensland 😊
Your stuff is always soo good!
I appreciate that!
The shape of the blast zone was crazy cool.
Cheers!!
I like these comp videos I just wish you'd edit out the "thanks for watching" part when you piece the videos together.
Noted!
3 of the 4 impacts were on the same type of video you put up 3 months ago, BORING!!!
That’s what a compilation generally is.
shanomac, As he said this is a compilation. What an ungrateful person you are.
just a heads up the Chesapeake Bay is not called cheese a peek Bay there's no cheese in it it's chefs as in CAESS APEAK that's how it's pronounced shut up peak there's no cheese in it it's not your fault that's how it's spelled And it's badly pronounced here in the Americas but it is formally called Chesapeake CHESSAPEAK Here's a peek. just a bit of advice when you're selling a foreign names you can check on youtube for pronunciation most of the pronunciations are correct But occasionally their crap and people know that in the comments so double check to be in the safe side or ask Google how do I pronounce cheese and peek. it's a little reminder to check beams before you try and pronounce them make sure you've got them being pronounced correctly for the region the country or the world the local variations for nameplaces and making sure that it sounds right to you and to other people. of not you have a great day.
I can't help but laugh when foreign tourists come to visit our city of Perth Western Australia...and of course Fremantle with it's smaller city "Cockburn" to the south.😂
Chesapeake bay was formed when a peice of cheese was ejected from the moon and landed in Canada,.
@MJC22.03 I m laughing along with you. Dont forget Albany. Its always mispronounced too. We have some of the funniest names here according to the tourists, both from over east and over seas and thats not even counting the indigenous names
An Australian should pronounce the first two syllables as "chezza" (with a short "e").
I don't know. I've always considered them there people being Cheesy.
1:06 This and the following ones are bad visualisations . A bollide does not become incandescent until it reaches the atmosphere and in this visualisation it starts becoming incandescent hundreds , possibly thousands of kilometers too soon.
7:24 this one is much more accurate
Yes, no. Have you witnessed this size object enter the atmosphere from that point of reference?? No. So although I do think "1.06 is wrong, or 7.24 looks more realistic" neither of us can say so definitively. 😊
@@logic.and.reasoning In these simulations the earth's size and the thickness of the atmosphere is never to scale. If it was to scale the atmosphere would be a very thin layer over the surface.
It is generally accepted that meteoroids begin to glow at the Kármán line (100 km) and larger objects below that.
On a large desk globe (diameter ~ 500 mm) , the Kármán line would be about 0.7 mm above the surface