It has become obvious to me lately that the people in "law enforcement" are NOT really interested in justice. I think they are often ex-jocks and the focus is on WINNING the contest. Not, "Is he guilty?" but "Can we find enough to make him LOOK guilty before a jury because that's when I get a raise and/or a promotion.
Great - glad it was helpful. Feel free to share it - and if you have questions or another topic you'd like covered, please feel free to leave them in the comments section.
A car simply coming back on a records-check as a rental is not sufficient to pull over the car. Now, that fact can be considered along with everything else going on as part of a totality-of-the circumstances analysis to determine if reasonable suspicion exists...
It has become obvious to me lately that the people in "law enforcement" are NOT really interested in justice.
I think they are often ex-jocks and the focus is on WINNING the contest.
Not, "Is he guilty?" but "Can we find enough to make him LOOK guilty before a jury because that's when I get a raise and/or a promotion.
Great video. Will use it for training.
Great - glad it was helpful. Feel free to share it - and if you have questions or another topic you'd like covered, please feel free to leave them in the comments section.
Can a rental car be considered reasonable suspicion to pull a vehicle over or lead to expanding the scope of the search?
A car simply coming back on a records-check as a rental is not sufficient to pull over the car. Now, that fact can be considered along with everything else going on as part of a totality-of-the circumstances analysis to determine if reasonable suspicion exists...
Is "mere suspicion" the same as "reasonable suspicion"?
No - "reasonable" is a standard explained by the courts. Which I also explain in this video.
Seems like alot of room to make shit up