What LePage is saying is that Thomson doesn't have to prove he means it. Rather, he has to Argue. Thomson has it wrong - he has to be "real," but real in communicating the words and their images, not his conviction. Thomson isn't "INSIDE' the word.
What year is this from? Btw, its fantastic :). I'm writing an essay on reading realist vs. reading contemporary performance and this is more helpful then you know.
both are awesome artists
Really helpful and insightful. It's quite a confusing, complex subject matter
What LePage is saying is that Thomson doesn't have to prove he means it. Rather, he has to Argue. Thomson has it wrong - he has to be "real," but real in communicating the words and their images, not his conviction. Thomson isn't "INSIDE' the word.
What year is this from? Btw, its fantastic :). I'm writing an essay on reading realist vs. reading contemporary performance and this is more helpful then you know.
LePage is, you know, go-ood
Because acting does involve craft and is about the character.
how about mic for the maestro??? we couldn't afford a second mic???
He is describing Brecht's verfremdung... actor 'playing' the character..