@@elric5371 He hates it because he hates it. It sounds way more fanboyish to hear someone say they don't like something and then get mad at them for it just cause you do. Nobody said you had to hate FO 3. And that's a very subjective opinion on the older games. I played FO1 a couple years ago for the first time and loved it. It only feels like a board game if you are unable to immerse yourself into games with a top down aesthetic.
so those "animated portraits" are recordings of real clay heads animated in stop motion. youre not watching a late 90s cgi render, youre watching claymation and it was really a unique way to show off important character dialogue
@@Niosai not only there. Its not possible to finish fallout 3 without getting kills at all. That was only possible at fallout 1 and vegas 2 too to a certain degree, but thats debatable since one way or another you had one mandatory kill (even if you can make up with your kill count at 0)
@@Jrdotan that has nothing to do with what he said, he didn't mention "not killing", he said you could play it without shooting a gun. Besides the BB gun that statement is true, because you can paly the rest of the game only using melee weapons.
It was technically a spin off. Bethesda wanted an in between title between releases so they had Obsidian Entertainment do it. However what they didn’t expect was that it would be the best 3D fallout and make them look like shit. It has proved itself to be mainline and most people consider it so as they should.
i remember playing fallout 2 on my old PC when i was 16 in ... 2001 i guess. It was on a budge compilation and a school friend gave it to me since i liked RPGs (after playing FF7) and was overwhelmed. It was sooo big and i could do everything (which i wasn't used to). ALso.... you know that V.A.T.S. did exist in the first two games as well? You could shoot specific body parts it just needed more AP. Also waiting... was also in the first games
I had the weirdest road to playing Fallout; I played Borderlands and realized I like FPS games when they have rpg/character building/looty loot, looked up what was similar, internet turned me onto Bioshock and New Vegas.
I was in 7th grade, and a buddy at school was recommending Dead Rising to me, and my dumbass got it mixed up with Fallout 3 and bought that instead. I was very disappointed at first but quickly realized this was better than a zombie game.
@@Niosai haha that's really stupid, it doesn't have a number in the title = spin-off is extremely idiotic and ignorant logic. Especially since it was never officially said that it's a spin-off. Heck, in another comment you outright said that you didn't really know so you just had to randomly choose so that "we wouldn't take issue".
@@Nrchy13 not mechanics that is a downright lie and as for story I agree the factions were done far better but the start of f4 story was superior to the start of nv for starters Kellogg>Bennie anyday.
I feel it's apt to call the 3D Fallout titles FPS games because the melee combat is just completely barebones and feels like an afterthought. You can swing, swing harder, and block. It just doesn't feel very compelling, leading to many people to just stick to guns. I'd also say that you just seem like a person who prefers FPS over traditional roleplaying or even RTS games, which is fine, but to call FO3 a "unique spin" on anything seems like a stretch. It's just Elder Scrolls, especially Oblivion, but you have guns. I'd say if you can play Starcraft or any similar title, you could easily get into Fallout 1 and 2 without it feeling very clunky, whereas comparing Fallout 3 to modern iterations of its gameplay, very much is so. The shooting feels off, the movement is stiff, and the dialogue is a huge step down from the Interplay titles, imo. And this is coming from someone whose first entry in the series was 3 and I still enjoy it very much to this day. But your comparisons of the it to 1 and 2 gameplay wise, just comes off a little weak. If you convert 1 and 2 into the style of 3, they would still be great based off their writing and exploration. I feel if you do the reverse to 3, you're just left with a rather mediocre experience overall.
Are you not considering New Vegas and FO4? New Vegas has special melee moves that can be learned from side quests which drastically changes melee from just "swing, swing harder, and block." Melee is also meant to be played in 3rd person as it allows for moves that cannot be done in 1st person.
@@roninscythe9733 Considering that he isn't covering NV in this video, I should think that my comments aren't directly applying to it, but even then, combat isn't really made that much better by the few moves that it adds(does it even do any beyond the Ranger Takedown? I guess the different punches count.) Even then, those require VATS which then boils it down to the same combat as shooting because there's little difference between the two in it. Comparing it to other 3rd person games that offer melee combat shows how basic it is. You have no real combos or any sense of flow to the moves you have available. It just feels very clunky most of the time. Again, I like the games well enough, but it does them no favors to pretend that they do anything beyond exploration and (sometimes) dialogue/quests particularly well. And what unique melee weapons add moves? I'm having a hard time thinking of any, unless you count stuff like the added knockback from the unique bat or stuff like that which isn't really added moves, so much as just elemental buffs/effects.
@@austinschmidt8054 in your original post, you said 3D Fallout games. Whether FNV was discussed in the video becomes irrelevant because you specifically said 3D Fallout games. Which FNV falls under. Not listing any of the perks you can get by leveling, but specifically ones you learn from side quests/encounters, off the top of my head I can think of Veronica’s scribe counter, Ranger takedown, Khan Pocket sand, and the Superman punch from the legion guy. Fair point with the 3rd person rebuttal. Fallout melee combat obviously isn’t Dark Souls standards, but I think it’s not entirely accurate to say that the melee combat is “barebones” because there is some spice. It has its ups and downs. And playing Fallout melee in 3rd person increases that spice.
@@roninscythe9733 I will give you that I didn't specify, that's fine. Think about that though, that is 4 additional options, many of which have the same effect, which is just temporarily stunning the enemy, so even with the added options, you aren't given much in terms of new things to do. It's fine if you enjoy the melee combat in the games, more power to you if you do. I just don't find it very appealing and feel that many people feel the same way, leading to the comment in the video about the 3D FO games being FPS. I do enjoy them, but they could do so much more with the system to make it actually engaging. Which maybe isn't their focus, but it just makes combat in general feel like a chore you go through to enjoy more of the world and storytelling it contains.
Excellent video, I really enjoyed it! But... I definitely feel like New Vegas is a mainline game, at least by most metrics. :( Not including it just... makes me kinda sad.
@@LaserVertex well it wasnt, irreguardless of opinion. unlike tactics, BOS, and 76. everything in it is considered fully canon. It's also just as long as fallout 3 if not longer, and the only reason it could be considered a spinoff is because of the title. It differs a lot from other mainline fallouts, for example being the only 3D western fallout, but it is a mainline game.
@@LaserVertex 76 is canon, yes, but its a spinoff. its a completely different genre from the rest of the fallout games, being an online pvp game instead of a singleplayer rpg game.
@@Niosai but it's not a spin-off though, just cause it doesn't have a number in the title doesn't make it a spin-off :/ Especially since it's literally made by the people (or at least most of them) who made Fallout 1 and 2. In all honesty it's a tad bit disrespectful to those devs, like "yeah you're the guys who created the franchise and the first two games but the game you made after Bethesda bought your IP is a spin-off cause it doesn't have a number in the title". Edit: Especially since the game uses most of the stuff scrapped from the og Fallout 3 before the series was bought by Bethesda so in a way it's also Fallout 3.
@@Niosai It was made to be a spin off but it’s become mainline at this point. It has the most dedicated fan base and is widely considered to be mainline by the fans. And considering it’s the best one and has the same scope as FO3 and 4...it deserved to be here.
@@gh05tnoh24 I definitely agree that it should be a mainline game! Unfortunately, I don't think my opinion overrides the actual CEO of Obsidian saying it's a side game 😅
I disagree, it is pretty good, and the closest that we got to an classic Fallout game, but imo still can't reach the same levels of Fallout 1 and especially Fallout 2
The computer animation is dope, but it think it'll flow better if the screen stays on screen, unless the "console" changes, and just fade the footage in and out rather than remove the graphic then bring it back.
19:35 Yea, definitely came from Elder Scrolls and because of how Bethesda's NPCs work. Definitely not from the first two games where, for example, a doctor in Shady Sands won't talk to you unless you need an emergency medical aid. Definitely "new" mechanical for a Fallout game.
I totally agree on your takes about the flow of F1, but these (for me) was remedied in F2. Gameplay wise of isometric games "Brotherhood of Steel" is clearly the best.
I picked up FO1 in August, along with 2 and Tactics. I figured I'd play in order, but I made the mistake of doing a high SAL, low PECI build. BIG MISTAKE. My character is so mind boggingly stupid that I'm locked out of most of the content. The only way I can access side quests is by oding on mentats, and I can't use companions so combat is hell. I don't level up because my intelligence is 1, and I can't use guns because my character struggles with vision due to low perception. If anybody picks it up for the first time, do not do as I did. I am a charlatan and a fool and I do not deserve to win this game for my arrogance. I accidentally hurt a brahmin once, so Junktown wants to kill me for some reason. Also, I don't like the save system. Solid 7/10 though I like it. I look forward to 2, I've heard it's better and more generous to... simple characters... so I will be continuing my inane and completely stupid SPECIAL build for consistency's sake.
@@thebatman7730 dip in further than your feet and you'll see a lot of contrarian and salty Fallout fans who only really drag each other down. They're pretty loud about it when you see their comments.
@@caseyhall2320 I searched and only coud find fanboys hating the video because he likes fallout 3 more than 1 and 2, and fanboys who hate the dude because he didnt put New Vegas as a main game. Im ashamed of the New Vegas community, even tho its my favorite fallout too.
I deffo feel like the voiced protagonist hindered the Fo4 modding scene. You don't see as many quest mods for the game as the likes of Skyrim. I feel like modders are not as interested in making voiced quest mods because the have to shoehorn the characters prerecorded voice clips into them or have the NPC's talk in a way that replying isn't required. It seems like more bother than it's worth.
It's interesting that he says most people he knows love Fallout 4. I appreciate that he added that it was anecdotal, and I'm certainly not going to argue with the tastes of others. enjoy what you enjoy. I'm just surprised because most people I've talked to shared my own view that the game felt somewhat unengaging. I've had a lot of people tell me that they didn't know how to describe it until I put it into words for them -- that Fallout 4, despite all it adds and creates and innovates on, just feels somehow shallow and unfocused. If I'm honest, the only engagement Fallout 4 ever got out of me was when I added mods and played through everything as an OP murder hobo, or when I was working on my settlement (because I'm a sucker for base-building). There are so many good ideas, new systems, and fun concepts added into the series by Fallout 4, but I always felt that the sheer amount of ways the game gets pulled in by all these differing ideas made it feel disjointed. IT felt like multiple games attempted to be one, and that's certainly an unfortunate thing to me.
If he's doing DS he should at least Branch out to Demon Souls. Probably BB and ER too. Maybe even Sekiro. It would feel weird to not do the other Soulslikes from the creators of the genre. Hell maybe add the Kings Field/Shadow Tower games since they are predecessors to the DS games. Of course it would also make sense to split them up like these Fallout ones.
@@shupasopni He's not really good with Soulsborne games, and I think making him do that all that would probably be his nightmare. It's why I said "I'm playing the Chaotic neutral card here" since he probably won't enjoy it, and he already tried out Elden Ring months ago
@@doomknight233 Oh I see. Well then yeah he should probs stay far away from all or most of those I mentioned. Although The Kings Field and Shadow Tower games are different enough combat wise he might actually like them, and it would be funny to skip the Soulsborne stuff, but go back for those. I don't know what exactly he doesn't like about Souls games though, and if OG Fallout felt clunky to him Kings Field might be right out.
(Before watching the video) If you're gonna say that Fallout 3, 4 and 76 were the ones that bored or frustrated you the most, you have no idea how profoundly NON-surprised I'm going to be
It's hard for me to say if 1 and 2 have aged well when I just don't like the isometric bird-with-mind-control-powers style, whether it's turn-based or not, but I can say for sure that I didn't enjoy them very much either. Didn't even bother to finish 2. New Vegas is great, but it's 4 I keep coming back to because while NV ends the game with a suitable epilogue after the main quest, 4 gives me something to do once I'm done with all the quests I care to finish, if I do quests at all. It may not be something _meaningful,_ granted, but damned if I haven't spent a couple hundred hours scrapping everything in a new settlement with the Sole Survivor's deconstructive heat vision, making my own little junk forts across the commonwealth, and using any prospective settlers as target practice.
I think you had to grow up with the Black Isle Fallout games. That gameplay was just what it was back then. You had so many other games just like it back then and it was not out of place or clunky at the time. Just a different world of gaming. I remember when Fallout 3 came out, I was hearbroken it was not an isometric style game and instead was an FPS. It felt so watered down and like they were pandering to the meathead crowd that just wanted to run around and shoot shit. I played it, it was fine, I moved on to New Vegas which was a masterpiece. Then Fallout 4 shit all over the franchise again. The people who deeply love Fallout (for the most part), almost all have the same mentality. The best ones are the ones Bethesda had nothing to do with.
Great Video like allways :D I realy enjoyed the 4th but never finished it or the 3.... For the future, I realy would like to see a legend of zelda Video
The title says "I played EVERY Fallout Game In 2022" but you only played half of them. You missed Fallout Tactics: Brotherhood of Steel, Fallout: Brotherhood of steel, Fallout New Vegas, Fallout Shelter and Fallout 76.
I’m curious. Could you play Wasteland 3? If you could, there’s no reason you couldn’t play Fallout 1&2 as your only complaint is that they’re both isometric. The combat system - I’ll give you that, it’s dated and rarely used in modern games. To call FNV a “spin off” is just incorrect. It’s not. It’s undoubtedly THE best entry in the modern Fallout series.
I agree! New Vegas being a spin-off doesn't stop it from being the best! :) I don't remember if I mentioned this in the video, but I actually have played Wasteland 3 and for some reason, that clicked with me a lot more than Fallout 1 and 2. I'll definitely have to revisit that at some point.
@@Niosai the thing whit the fallout games is whit out Brotherhood of steal and Shelter all the games are no only in the same universe-timeline but influence each other so spinoff is more lose term that whit other franshises
Been following since that first Elder Scrolls video. Also been hoping possibly for an Assassin's Creed video... Just me? Fallout was a good choice though 😎
I liked both Obsidian and Bethesda's fallout, and I have played fallout 1 & 2 right through but I'm not that old so getting through it took me awhile cause I wasn't use to the mechanics of it. But fallout 3 will always have my heart, as well as it's story and world. The ambience was the strongest for me, it felt like a real desolate wasteland with no hope. Though the companion system, and side quests for Vegas were vastly superior. And a side note to, not really related, but new Vegas mods bang.
I actually originally tried playing it in a small window and using my capture software to make it larger, but that ended up being unwieldy 😅 I did end up kinda sorta doing that for Tactics in part 2, though
Hey dude I’ve watched quite a few of your videos now - I really enjoy them - I just wanted to point out a little pet peeve of mine lol sorry I hear a lot of incorrect uses of “is” and “are” when referring to things that are singular and plural. For example at the beginning, “here’s [here is] my thoughts”. It should be, “here’re [here are] my thoughts”
Just to inform everybody: V.A.T.S. and time waiting is actually present in original games. First one can be used by clicking on weapon icon during combat with right click (where you can also change mode for certain weapons or reload) and second is bell in Pip Boy menu at the top alongside clock/date. Originals are cool, 4 is fine, and i havent played 76, but NV is still my favorite game.
I'm surprised, how one can actually miss this about waiting and VATS. But I agree, New Vegas is the best. It brings together the writing of the first 2 games, and 3D from Bethesda. Perfect, is what it is.
Which one has been the most fun for you so far? For me personally I have the most memories with 4. I know tons of people love 3 and think either that or new Vegas is the best of the series to me 4 is the best
@@jeremyroberts8822 my first ever fallout was 4. I loved it, played a shit ton. Still had lot of fun when i replayed but sadly i played it so much i can't enjoy it like i did when everything was new. Still is one of my favorite game ever and my favorite fallout. I really really loved fallout 3 and (im sorry) didnt like that much new vegas. I think it's very overrated. Never played 1 and 2 and never will. Actually liked 76 for what it was. :)
@NikeonNK Overrated is lazy and just avoids typing real criticism. I know it's a comment you probably don't care but still it's lazy and overused to describe games. Not trying to be rude it just is.
Yeah and it's a pretty vital feature too. Certain quests and quest solutions can only be done at certain times, and if your character gets exhausted from doing first aid/doctor checks to heal up, you can just wait an hour to get around that. Plus it's just nice to arrive in a town and then wait until morning where you can actually see what's going on.
Fallout 1 asked you what you were willing to do in order to save your community. You could doom the town of Necropolis to save your vault, or take up hit jobs for the underworlders of the Hub. Fallout 2 asks you what prices are worth paying for the return of civilization, and who's vision of the wasteland is worth supporting. Fallout 3 just asks you if you want to blow up a town for no reason or not.
@@LaserVertex oh yea isnt it just amazing when 1 person infinitely duplicates an item and crashes the whole server no i love it so much that the game wont even let me play it
If someone just remade the first two games in a newer engine, I could do with that. Doesn’t even have to be 3D. I just can’t get past how archaic it feels. Think Pillars of Eternity or Tyranny. The stories and environment are amazing, I will say that.
I understand what people mean when they say Fallout 4 doesn't feel much like an rpg due to the combat, but that's why I choose survival mode. I think making the game more of a survival challenge really make you rethink the way you play and the character you build.
Personally, i think the classical game's problem is its huge learning curve, almost like a cliff, and it just get worse when the games just straight out drop you with no tutorial whatsoever. Thanks to the internet, i could learned how to play the game and even got several useful tips. If it wasn't for it tho i couldn't really see me going through and enjoy them.
VATS was in Fallout and Fallout 2 as well. Fallout 3 did not invent that. Including the limb crippling and weapon dropping. Bethesda was not that clever.
Smh at all the people assuming NV being a spin off means it must be bad. Being a spin off isn't an insult! It's still the best of the series imo but it doesn't change the fact that isn't part of the main series
Even if you plan to do it later, New Vegas is a mainline game. Hell, it’s even a continuation of the original 2 games made by a lot of the same devs, so I’d say it’s more mainline than 3 & 4. Is Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood not a mainline game? What about Crash Bandicoot Warped? Numbers haven’t meant anything in video games for like 10 years.
Believe in whatever you will. It still wouldn't change the games cannon. New Vegas is a spinoff. It's all about who owns the creative rights to the franchise.
I figured some people would take issue with this. While you're examples are technically correct depending on how you look at it, New Vegas is definitely a spin-off. I look forward to covering it, though!
I’d need to hear your bullet point reasons to actually agree with you. Here’s mine. - It may not be developed by Bethesda, but it was still published by them (eg. Max Payne; 2 devs, one publisher.) - The events are canon to the stories of the originals and the Bethesda games. - The games mechanics are ported straight from FO3 - It has major DLC expansions like all mainline Bethesda games since Oblivion I mean, what even is mainline and what is a spin-off? I guess Bethesda must have called it a spin-off themselves for you to think that way. It’s literally equating New Vegas with Fallout Shelter.
@@bennyheadofthechairmen8808 I don’t know what you mean by canon. Because events in New Vegas are canon. They directly connect to the first 2 games and are mentioned in 4.
@@Niosai the fact that you make it sound like a fact by using "is definitely" is absolutely disgusting. Only the Wikipedia says that it's a spin-off and it's not even an official source, the fallout wiki says it isn't a direct sequel to 3 but is the fourth major installment in the series. So there's no official thing about it being a spin-off or not do you had to take the worst choice that makes you lose karma smh.
you said settlements are “almost entirely optional” unfortunately that isn’t really the case if you want to do the story And there was a few other small details you got wrong but otherwise really good video and I cannot wait to see more
I have to admit I dislike basically everything relating Fallout 4. The visuals are simply not the way the should've move foward, the dialogue options are simply a waste, the environment is not oppressive unless you get to the places were there is high radiation. Overall is not a bad game or anything but the role playing mechanics this series is played for are devolved somehow. I hope the simply make a game with depressive visuals and alike mechanics with the previous but expanding the already big lore
Fallout3 holds a dear place in my heart for being the first one I played back when it came out and I fell in love with the series. But New Vegas is the best one. I so hope they make another good one since 76 was a disaster
Fallout 2 is on of my top 3 favorite games and I love fallout 3 since it was my first and the dystopian cityscape. But fallout new Vegas is by far on of the best games ever made but it doesn’t take fallout 3 let alone the perfection of fallout 2.
Who made the better Fallout games, Interplay or Bethesda? New Vegas doesn't count! (yet)
Interplay. Easily
Interplay, mainly because i hate fallout 3.
@@pavko1337 why hate fallout 3 you guys are just fan boys the original games are just so outdated and like board games. Compared to the later games.
@@elric5371 He hates it because he hates it. It sounds way more fanboyish to hear someone say they don't like something and then get mad at them for it just cause you do. Nobody said you had to hate FO 3.
And that's a very subjective opinion on the older games. I played FO1 a couple years ago for the first time and loved it. It only feels like a board game if you are unable to immerse yourself into games with a top down aesthetic.
@@elric5371 Because i found it bland and not fun. Also why am I the fanboy? Because I hate objectively the worst fallout in the franchise? lmao
so those "animated portraits" are recordings of real clay heads animated in stop motion. youre not watching a late 90s cgi render, youre watching claymation and it was really a unique way to show off important character dialogue
"You can do an entire playthrough without firing a gun once" Unskippable main quest at the start of the game: Shoot roach with bb gun
Alright, you got me there lmao I completely forgot you didn't have a choice there
@@Niosai not only there.
Its not possible to finish fallout 3 without getting kills at all.
That was only possible at fallout 1 and vegas
2 too to a certain degree, but thats debatable since one way or another you had one mandatory kill (even if you can make up with your kill count at 0)
A BB gun isn’t a gun it’s a advanced toy
BB gun is a gun as long as it can put you in a hospital.
@@Jrdotan that has nothing to do with what he said, he didn't mention "not killing", he said you could play it without shooting a gun. Besides the BB gun that statement is true, because you can paly the rest of the game only using melee weapons.
This is the first time I've heard someone call new vegas a spin-off I could've sworn it was mainline
It was technically a spin off. Bethesda wanted an in between title between releases so they had Obsidian Entertainment do it. However what they didn’t expect was that it would be the best 3D fallout and make them look like shit. It has proved itself to be mainline and most people consider it so as they should.
It is a mainline game
it is a lot of the lore in the game shows up in fallout 4
@@liamlinson7563 spinoff doesnt mean noncanon
@@Kelis98 it isn't though. It's not part of the main series. It's just a fact and it's not an insult. It's still the best game in the franchise
i remember playing fallout 2 on my old PC when i was 16 in ... 2001 i guess. It was on a budge compilation and a school friend gave it to me since i liked RPGs (after playing FF7) and was overwhelmed. It was sooo big and i could do everything (which i wasn't used to). ALso.... you know that V.A.T.S. did exist in the first two games as well? You could shoot specific body parts it just needed more AP.
Also waiting... was also in the first games
1 and 2 are the best games in this series. Truly amazing games.
I had the weirdest road to playing Fallout; I played Borderlands and realized I like FPS games when they have rpg/character building/looty loot, looked up what was similar, internet turned me onto Bioshock and New Vegas.
I was in 7th grade, and a buddy at school was recommending Dead Rising to me, and my dumbass got it mixed up with Fallout 3 and bought that instead. I was very disappointed at first but quickly realized this was better than a zombie game.
When I was in the 7th grade, I was playing Fallout 1 and 2 as they were new games at that time. It was wonderful ^^
Not including New Vegas as a main title just feels wrong.
Easily the best out of all of them
I won't disagree with you, but just because it's the best doesn't mean it isn't a spin-off 😢
@@Niosai Personaly I feel it's a mainline entry. But either way this I great content. Keep it up
It's absolutely a main title
@@Niosai but it really isnt a spin off
Its like, literally a sequel to the originals with returning characters and such
@@Niosai haha that's really stupid, it doesn't have a number in the title = spin-off is extremely idiotic and ignorant logic.
Especially since it was never officially said that it's a spin-off. Heck, in another comment you outright said that you didn't really know so you just had to randomly choose so that "we wouldn't take issue".
19:38 Waiting was actually in the OG Fallouts.
No new vegas? It's literally the best game in the series.
I think he consider New Vegas a spin off because isn't numbered.
In your opinion for me it didn’t have the exploration vibe of a apocalyptic wasteland that f3 and f4 did.
@@elric5371 heck like over 1/3 of the playable area is taken by the vegas part of the game and all the other buildings related to it etc...
@@elric5371 but It had a cohesive story and better game mechanics 💀
@@Nrchy13 not mechanics that is a downright lie and as for story I agree the factions were done far better but the start of f4 story was superior to the start of nv for starters Kellogg>Bennie anyday.
I feel it's apt to call the 3D Fallout titles FPS games because the melee combat is just completely barebones and feels like an afterthought. You can swing, swing harder, and block. It just doesn't feel very compelling, leading to many people to just stick to guns.
I'd also say that you just seem like a person who prefers FPS over traditional roleplaying or even RTS games, which is fine, but to call FO3 a "unique spin" on anything seems like a stretch. It's just Elder Scrolls, especially Oblivion, but you have guns.
I'd say if you can play Starcraft or any similar title, you could easily get into Fallout 1 and 2 without it feeling very clunky, whereas comparing Fallout 3 to modern iterations of its gameplay, very much is so. The shooting feels off, the movement is stiff, and the dialogue is a huge step down from the Interplay titles, imo.
And this is coming from someone whose first entry in the series was 3 and I still enjoy it very much to this day. But your comparisons of the it to 1 and 2 gameplay wise, just comes off a little weak.
If you convert 1 and 2 into the style of 3, they would still be great based off their writing and exploration. I feel if you do the reverse to 3, you're just left with a rather mediocre experience overall.
Are you not considering New Vegas and FO4? New Vegas has special melee moves that can be learned from side quests which drastically changes melee from just "swing, swing harder, and block." Melee is also meant to be played in 3rd person as it allows for moves that cannot be done in 1st person.
Not to mention uniques and perks that add moves and effects.
@@roninscythe9733 Considering that he isn't covering NV in this video, I should think that my comments aren't directly applying to it, but even then, combat isn't really made that much better by the few moves that it adds(does it even do any beyond the Ranger Takedown? I guess the different punches count.) Even then, those require VATS which then boils it down to the same combat as shooting because there's little difference between the two in it.
Comparing it to other 3rd person games that offer melee combat shows how basic it is. You have no real combos or any sense of flow to the moves you have available. It just feels very clunky most of the time.
Again, I like the games well enough, but it does them no favors to pretend that they do anything beyond exploration and (sometimes) dialogue/quests particularly well.
And what unique melee weapons add moves? I'm having a hard time thinking of any, unless you count stuff like the added knockback from the unique bat or stuff like that which isn't really added moves, so much as just elemental buffs/effects.
@@austinschmidt8054 in your original post, you said 3D Fallout games. Whether FNV was discussed in the video becomes irrelevant because you specifically said 3D Fallout games. Which FNV falls under.
Not listing any of the perks you can get by leveling, but specifically ones you learn from side quests/encounters, off the top of my head I can think of Veronica’s scribe counter, Ranger takedown, Khan Pocket sand, and the Superman punch from the legion guy.
Fair point with the 3rd person rebuttal. Fallout melee combat obviously isn’t Dark Souls standards, but I think it’s not entirely accurate to say that the melee combat is “barebones” because there is some spice. It has its ups and downs. And playing Fallout melee in 3rd person increases that spice.
@@roninscythe9733 I will give you that I didn't specify, that's fine.
Think about that though, that is 4 additional options, many of which have the same effect, which is just temporarily stunning the enemy, so even with the added options, you aren't given much in terms of new things to do.
It's fine if you enjoy the melee combat in the games, more power to you if you do. I just don't find it very appealing and feel that many people feel the same way, leading to the comment in the video about the 3D FO games being FPS.
I do enjoy them, but they could do so much more with the system to make it actually engaging. Which maybe isn't their focus, but it just makes combat in general feel like a chore you go through to enjoy more of the world and storytelling it contains.
Excellent video, I really enjoyed it! But...
I definitely feel like New Vegas is a mainline game, at least by most metrics. :(
Not including it just... makes me kinda sad.
Agreed.
@@LaserVertex well it wasnt, irreguardless of opinion. unlike tactics, BOS, and 76. everything in it is considered fully canon. It's also just as long as fallout 3 if not longer, and the only reason it could be considered a spinoff is because of the title. It differs a lot from other mainline fallouts, for example being the only 3D western fallout, but it is a mainline game.
@@LaserVertex 76 is canon, yes, but its a spinoff. its a completely different genre from the rest of the fallout games, being an online pvp game instead of a singleplayer rpg game.
@@LaserVertex "valid argument, I have not. speech bubbles and nerd emoji, I must send."
-Master Yoda
@@LaserVertex guy try’s to have a discussion you🤓 “🤓🤓🤓”
Everyday i get a little closer to seeing every fallout video ever….
Not putting new Vegas in here when it’s by far and away the best in the Franchise is criminal.
I mentioned this a couple of times, but the next video will cover up the spin-offs :)
@@Niosai but it's not a spin-off though, just cause it doesn't have a number in the title doesn't make it a spin-off :/
Especially since it's literally made by the people (or at least most of them) who made Fallout 1 and 2.
In all honesty it's a tad bit disrespectful to those devs, like "yeah you're the guys who created the franchise and the first two games but the game you made after Bethesda bought your IP is a spin-off cause it doesn't have a number in the title".
Edit:
Especially since the game uses most of the stuff scrapped from the og Fallout 3 before the series was bought by Bethesda so in a way it's also Fallout 3.
@@Niosai It was made to be a spin off but it’s become mainline at this point. It has the most dedicated fan base and is widely considered to be mainline by the fans. And considering it’s the best one and has the same scope as FO3 and 4...it deserved to be here.
@@gh05tnoh24 I definitely agree that it should be a mainline game! Unfortunately, I don't think my opinion overrides the actual CEO of Obsidian saying it's a side game 😅
I disagree, it is pretty good, and the closest that we got to an classic Fallout game, but imo still can't reach the same levels of Fallout 1 and especially Fallout 2
*YOU ARE OUT OF UNIFORM SOLDIER! WHERE IS YOUR POWER ARMOR!!!!!!!?????*
I believe the dialogues trees in fallout 1 doesn't use 3d models. I've heard somewhere they are actually clay models.
Talking about Fallout games and not mentioning New Vegas feels like a crime.
I mentioned a couple of times that I'll be making the spin-off video next :)
The computer animation is dope, but it think it'll flow better if the screen stays on screen, unless the "console" changes, and just fade the footage in and out rather than remove the graphic then bring it back.
19:35 Yea, definitely came from Elder Scrolls and because of how Bethesda's NPCs work. Definitely not from the first two games where, for example, a doctor in Shady Sands won't talk to you unless you need an emergency medical aid. Definitely "new" mechanical for a Fallout game.
Definitely check out the part of the video where I played 1 and 2, hopefully that'll shed some light on how I might've missed that mechanic :)
I totally agree on your takes about the flow of F1, but these (for me) was remedied in F2. Gameplay wise of isometric games "Brotherhood of Steel" is clearly the best.
I picked up FO1 in August, along with 2 and Tactics. I figured I'd play in order, but I made the mistake of doing a high SAL, low PECI build. BIG MISTAKE. My character is so mind boggingly stupid that I'm locked out of most of the content. The only way I can access side quests is by oding on mentats, and I can't use companions so combat is hell. I don't level up because my intelligence is 1, and I can't use guns because my character struggles with vision due to low perception. If anybody picks it up for the first time, do not do as I did. I am a charlatan and a fool and I do not deserve to win this game for my arrogance. I accidentally hurt a brahmin once, so Junktown wants to kill me for some reason.
Also, I don't like the save system. Solid 7/10 though I like it.
I look forward to 2, I've heard it's better and more generous to... simple characters... so I will be continuing my inane and completely stupid SPECIAL build for consistency's sake.
that build sounds hilarious but would be much better suited to second time players
Wow, someone who isn't hating on the Fallout games or being snarky. We need more of people like you 😂
People hate on these games? I’ve only heard hate towards 76 but not towards the others.
@@thebatman7730 dip in further than your feet and you'll see a lot of contrarian and salty Fallout fans who only really drag each other down. They're pretty loud about it when you see their comments.
@@caseyhall2320 I searched and only coud find fanboys hating the video because he likes fallout 3 more than 1 and 2, and fanboys who hate the dude because he didnt put New Vegas as a main game. Im ashamed of the New Vegas community, even tho its my favorite fallout too.
I deffo feel like the voiced protagonist hindered the Fo4 modding scene. You don't see as many quest mods for the game as the likes of Skyrim. I feel like modders are not as interested in making voiced quest mods because the have to shoehorn the characters prerecorded voice clips into them or have the NPC's talk in a way that replying isn't required. It seems like more bother than it's worth.
It's interesting that he says most people he knows love Fallout 4. I appreciate that he added that it was anecdotal, and I'm certainly not going to argue with the tastes of others. enjoy what you enjoy. I'm just surprised because most people I've talked to shared my own view that the game felt somewhat unengaging. I've had a lot of people tell me that they didn't know how to describe it until I put it into words for them -- that Fallout 4, despite all it adds and creates and innovates on, just feels somehow shallow and unfocused. If I'm honest, the only engagement Fallout 4 ever got out of me was when I added mods and played through everything as an OP murder hobo, or when I was working on my settlement (because I'm a sucker for base-building). There are so many good ideas, new systems, and fun concepts added into the series by Fallout 4, but I always felt that the sheer amount of ways the game gets pulled in by all these differing ideas made it feel disjointed. IT felt like multiple games attempted to be one, and that's certainly an unfortunate thing to me.
You should try doing a playthrough of playing the Dark Souls series :}
I'm playing the Chaotic neutral card here
If he's doing DS he should at least Branch out to Demon Souls. Probably BB and ER too. Maybe even Sekiro. It would feel weird to not do the other Soulslikes from the creators of the genre.
Hell maybe add the Kings Field/Shadow Tower games since they are predecessors to the DS games.
Of course it would also make sense to split them up like these Fallout ones.
@@shupasopni He's not really good with Soulsborne games, and I think making him do that all that would probably be his nightmare. It's why I said "I'm playing the Chaotic neutral card here" since he probably won't enjoy it, and he already tried out Elden Ring months ago
@@doomknight233 Oh I see. Well then yeah he should probs stay far away from all or most of those I mentioned.
Although The Kings Field and Shadow Tower games are different enough combat wise he might actually like them, and it would be funny to skip the Soulsborne stuff, but go back for those.
I don't know what exactly he doesn't like about Souls games though, and if OG Fallout felt clunky to him Kings Field might be right out.
The lack of fallout new vegas hurts me physically and mentally
I mentioned this in the video, but it'll be in the spin-offs video which will be coming soon :)
@@Niosai not really a spinoff though. It was a proper and canon game, just made by a different development studio.
NV is a mainline title and you shouldn't say "every" if you leave out Tactics, BoS, NV, 76, Shelter, etc
I mentioned this a couple of times in the video, but the next video will cover all of the spin-offs :)
@@Niosai I understand that but the title is misleading and NV is a mainline title
“Modding Fallout is a really fun CHORE” so true.
(Before watching the video)
If you're gonna say that Fallout 3, 4 and 76 were the ones that bored or frustrated you the most, you have no idea how profoundly NON-surprised I'm going to be
I hope you were pleasantly surprised lmao
It's hard for me to say if 1 and 2 have aged well when I just don't like the isometric bird-with-mind-control-powers style, whether it's turn-based or not, but I can say for sure that I didn't enjoy them very much either. Didn't even bother to finish 2.
New Vegas is great, but it's 4 I keep coming back to because while NV ends the game with a suitable epilogue after the main quest, 4 gives me something to do once I'm done with all the quests I care to finish, if I do quests at all. It may not be something _meaningful,_ granted, but damned if I haven't spent a couple hundred hours scrapping everything in a new settlement with the Sole Survivor's deconstructive heat vision, making my own little junk forts across the commonwealth, and using any prospective settlers as target practice.
I actually enjoyed the modded fallout 4 waay better than original story.
New Vegas fanbois seething and crying in the comments. What else is new?
They think being a spin off = bad. Idk who told them that's what it means but it's hilarious
I’m actually about to cry because nv isn’t in this video
Next video! :)
Something I think could be handy for new pc steam players is that you can't play fallout 3 in 2023 on pc, not many mention this.
Great video mate.
Huh? I played it just fine on my PC?
@@Niosai Please teach me.
It crashes for me when pressing new game everytime.
ua-cam.com/video/RDTViZGRhJo/v-deo.html in case anyone else has the same problem. I don't know the guy but it helped me :)
I think you had to grow up with the Black Isle Fallout games. That gameplay was just what it was back then. You had so many other games just like it back then and it was not out of place or clunky at the time. Just a different world of gaming. I remember when Fallout 3 came out, I was hearbroken it was not an isometric style game and instead was an FPS. It felt so watered down and like they were pandering to the meathead crowd that just wanted to run around and shoot shit. I played it, it was fine, I moved on to New Vegas which was a masterpiece. Then Fallout 4 shit all over the franchise again. The people who deeply love Fallout (for the most part), almost all have the same mentality. The best ones are the ones Bethesda had nothing to do with.
Yeah baby, that's what I've been waiting for! That's what it's all about! Woohoo!
Great Video like allways :D I realy enjoyed the 4th but never finished it or the 3....
For the future, I realy would like to see a legend of zelda Video
mf played both fallout 1 and 2 without knowing there was a waiting option lmao
I'm always excited to see your vids
The title says "I played EVERY Fallout Game In 2022" but you only played half of them. You missed Fallout Tactics: Brotherhood of Steel, Fallout: Brotherhood of steel, Fallout New Vegas, Fallout Shelter and Fallout 76.
He said he will cover them in the next vid
This video is a part 1. He said he'll cover the rest of them in the next video.
he should have done New Vegas at least its the best one.
@@robertwatts7894 Yes and that’s why it needs to be in a separate video so it can I have more time and attention put on it
It was clarified at the start of the video. Go figure.
20:00 You know, All fallout had the also the same system.
Fallout 76 is not mainline?
All 3 of them?
fallout 1, 2 and new vegas? xD
I’m curious. Could you play Wasteland 3? If you could, there’s no reason you couldn’t play Fallout 1&2 as your only complaint is that they’re both isometric. The combat system - I’ll give you that, it’s dated and rarely used in modern games.
To call FNV a “spin off” is just incorrect. It’s not. It’s undoubtedly THE best entry in the modern Fallout series.
I agree! New Vegas being a spin-off doesn't stop it from being the best! :)
I don't remember if I mentioned this in the video, but I actually have played Wasteland 3 and for some reason, that clicked with me a lot more than Fallout 1 and 2. I'll definitely have to revisit that at some point.
"Spin off" does not mean "bad game". It's a spin off and also the best game
Another series complete! Well done! these games are all fairly long as well! Your patience is god like
kinda miss a few main games
kinda strange for every fallout game
but im sure thats clear by now
I mentioned this a few times in the video, but the next video will cover the spin-offs :)
@@Niosai the thing whit the fallout games is whit out Brotherhood of steal and Shelter all the games are no only in the same universe-timeline but influence each other so spinoff is more lose term that whit other franshises
Fallout looked really great for a 1997 game
You either have another mad video or have chosen war
There's a spin-offs video!
I don’t think you can wait in the console version of Fallout 3 or New Vegas.
You definitely can! Should be Select if you're on PS3 or Back if you're on 360
@@Niosai I play the versions on Xbox one via Game Pass. I have tried every button at that.
@@pendremacherald6758I know I’m late but you can definetely wait I’m pretty sure it’s the two windows button
@@FBI-pr4qi I figured it out after a long time of being stupid.
love your videos but this is a massive fucking L, new vegas is a mainline game fr
Play every just cause
you've missed a few fallout games
I mentioned a couple of times in the video that my next video will be the spin-offs :)
@@Niosai i realised after i got more into the video my bad.
Oooo learning time!
Fallout 4
Fallout 2
Fallout 3
Fallout
Fallout New Vegas
Fallout Tactics
Fallout Brotherhood of Steel
Wild cat weather made these types of videos.... earlier than you .. idk if he wa s the first one..
Been following since that first Elder Scrolls video. Also been hoping possibly for an Assassin's Creed video... Just me?
Fallout was a good choice though 😎
I definitely want to do AC! There's just so many 😅
@@Niosai it could easily take 2 videos to cover it. It would be very brave of you to try! ❤️
Not adding New Vegas to this video is a bad karma choice
I have a whole second video covering every spin-off :)
New Vegas is not a spinoff😭
I liked both Obsidian and Bethesda's fallout, and I have played fallout 1 & 2 right through but I'm not that old so getting through it took me awhile cause I wasn't use to the mechanics of it. But fallout 3 will always have my heart, as well as it's story and world. The ambience was the strongest for me, it felt like a real desolate wasteland with no hope. Though the companion system, and side quests for Vegas were vastly superior. And a side note to, not really related, but new Vegas mods bang.
You left out like 5 games
I mentioned this a few times in this video, but I'll be covering the spin-offs in the next video :)
@@Niosai Yeah IK but imo NV should have been included as it is a main game
Being bald is cool if you have a good beard and a decent amount of muscle
Oohh you poor soul
hey, can you play the naruto clash of ninja and clash of ninja revolution games?
Pretty bare bones for a review. Also if you played more than 1h you'd realize that fallout 1 and 2 are almost nothing alike (besides the surface look)
"I just cant make myself enjoy it", how i felt towards Fallout 3 😆
Where fallout Tactic's?.
It'll be in the spin-offs video :)
@@Niosai Aight.
Fallout new Vegas is the best fallout game
What's your second favorite?
@@Niosai has to be fallout 4 yes long as heck to finish in casual play thru but really have yet to try fallout 3
@@thebruisers1372 Play Fallout 2
Puts every on caps on title yet no 76. or shelter.
Yep! Check out "I Played EVERY Fallout Spin-Off" for the spin-offs, those included :)
@@Niosai Oh, my bad, i should have checked. I will now. Thank you.
@@davidsomoza No worries! I know my naming scheme can be a little confusing. I hope you enjoy it! :)
I wish it were illegal to play 1 and 2 in 1080p cuz that just looks awful.
I actually originally tried playing it in a small window and using my capture software to make it larger, but that ended up being unwieldy 😅 I did end up kinda sorta doing that for Tactics in part 2, though
Particularly if you can't zoom in and out, yes
Hey dude I’ve watched quite a few of your videos now - I really enjoy them - I just wanted to point out a little pet peeve of mine lol sorry
I hear a lot of incorrect uses of “is” and “are” when referring to things that are singular and plural. For example at the beginning, “here’s [here is] my thoughts”. It should be, “here’re [here are] my thoughts”
While you're right, I've said this in every video and there's no going back now 😂
Hey yo
Fallout 4 > New Vegas
That's a DIVISIVE take lmao
Nv fans malding in the comments lol
Ausitm
Thanks, Bruce Lee!
Well, that's a misleading video title for ya. Not very good.
If you're wondering about the spin-offs, they're in a second video :)
New Vegas is not a game
Definitely check out the follow-up, "I played every Fallout spin-off game!"
Not putting New Vegas as mainline title is.. certainly a choice.
New Vegas was developed by Obsidian, not Bethesda Game Studios, and BGS clearly views it as a black sheep in the franchise
Do you realize how illogical that sounds.
It’s not, though.
@@spartapeterson BGS is worthless. Obsidian is formed by the same people that created the franchise, hence why NV is the best 3D game.
@@Melkac it wasn’t though? It retconned a lot of things and also it was only a quarter of the staff from interplay
Just to inform everybody: V.A.T.S. and time waiting is actually present in original games. First one can be used by clicking on weapon icon during combat with right click (where you can also change mode for certain weapons or reload) and second is bell in Pip Boy menu at the top alongside clock/date.
Originals are cool, 4 is fine, and i havent played 76, but NV is still my favorite game.
I'm surprised, how one can actually miss this about waiting and VATS. But I agree, New Vegas is the best. It brings together the writing of the first 2 games, and 3D from Bethesda. Perfect, is what it is.
It wasnt called V.A.T.S tho, it was just an aiming system akin to XCOM and jagged alliance
I agree with everything you said. And I'm also a huge MK9 fan. Greetings from Germany
@@Jrdotan Yeah but it was the precursor. Bethesda didn’t come up with vats they saw the basic aimed shot mechanic and decided to make it a lore thing.
fine is...a thing you could say about fallout 4 i guess
fallout 1/2 isnt for everyone but im glad you gave them a try! some of my favorite games
They're excellent games! Same concept as appreciating something like Citizen Kane but not enjoying it yourself :)
Fallout 2 is a chefs kiss
Just finished Fallout 3 and New Vegas a week ago and currently playing through 4. Couldnt be a better timing for me.
Which one has been the most fun for you so far? For me personally I have the most memories with 4. I know tons of people love 3 and think either that or new Vegas is the best of the series to me 4 is the best
@@jeremyroberts8822 my first ever fallout was 4. I loved it, played a shit ton. Still had lot of fun when i replayed but sadly i played it so much i can't enjoy it like i did when everything was new. Still is one of my favorite game ever and my favorite fallout.
I really really loved fallout 3 and (im sorry) didnt like that much new vegas. I think it's very overrated. Never played 1 and 2 and never will. Actually liked 76 for what it was. :)
@NikeonNK Overrated is lazy and just avoids typing real criticism. I know it's a comment you probably don't care but still it's lazy and overused to describe games. Not trying to be rude it just is.
@@sityslow yeah ik i just dont want to actually spend 10 minutes writting what i think of it.
You can wait in Fallout 1 and 2
Yeah and it's a pretty vital feature too. Certain quests and quest solutions can only be done at certain times, and if your character gets exhausted from doing first aid/doctor checks to heal up, you can just wait an hour to get around that. Plus it's just nice to arrive in a town and then wait until morning where you can actually see what's going on.
Fallout 1 asked you what you were willing to do in order to save your community. You could doom the town of Necropolis to save your vault, or take up hit jobs for the underworlders of the Hub. Fallout 2 asks you what prices are worth paying for the return of civilization, and who's vision of the wasteland is worth supporting. Fallout 3 just asks you if you want to blow up a town for no reason or not.
Just to let you know waiting was a thing in fallout 1 and 2 you just had to do it through your pip boy.
Makes me sad that New Vegas is going to be in the same video with Brotherhood and 76.
Makes me damn happy
@@bennyheadofthechairmen8808 why?
@@Just_Lionz cuz new Vegas will stand out even more
Compared to both of them
@@Just_Lionz ignore that person, in other comments they keep expressing how much they dislike NV.
@@LaserVertex oh yea isnt it just amazing when 1 person infinitely duplicates an item and crashes the whole server no i love it so much that the game wont even let me play it
new Vegas is the best.
If someone just remade the first two games in a newer engine, I could do with that. Doesn’t even have to be 3D. I just can’t get past how archaic it feels. Think Pillars of Eternity or Tyranny.
The stories and environment are amazing, I will say that.
Yea Im on the same page. I'm not even that bothered by aging games necessarily, but Fallout 1 and 2 just feel too dated, even for me.
How do you decide if a game is dated?
I can't relate to that, since I rarely find a game unplayable. And I wonder what counts as archaic design.
@@oddtomato1049 He gave you 2 examples.
theres a mod being developed doing this, called vault 13
@@mathiaschristensen1194 Neither of you did. You just siad they feel old, and I don't know what you mean by that.
I understand what people mean when they say Fallout 4 doesn't feel much like an rpg due to the combat, but that's why I choose survival mode. I think making the game more of a survival challenge really make you rethink the way you play and the character you build.
Personally, i think the classical game's problem is its huge learning curve, almost like a cliff, and it just get worse when the games just straight out drop you with no tutorial whatsoever.
Thanks to the internet, i could learned how to play the game and even got several useful tips. If it wasn't for it tho i couldn't really see me going through and enjoy them.
VATS was in Fallout and Fallout 2 as well. Fallout 3 did not invent that. Including the limb crippling and weapon dropping. Bethesda was not that clever.
Smh at all the people assuming NV being a spin off means it must be bad. Being a spin off isn't an insult! It's still the best of the series imo but it doesn't change the fact that isn't part of the main series
Even if you plan to do it later, New Vegas is a mainline game. Hell, it’s even a continuation of the original 2 games made by a lot of the same devs, so I’d say it’s more mainline than 3 & 4. Is Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood not a mainline game? What about Crash Bandicoot Warped? Numbers haven’t meant anything in video games for like 10 years.
Believe in whatever you will. It still wouldn't change the games cannon. New Vegas is a spinoff. It's all about who owns the creative rights to the franchise.
I figured some people would take issue with this. While you're examples are technically correct depending on how you look at it, New Vegas is definitely a spin-off. I look forward to covering it, though!
I’d need to hear your bullet point reasons to actually agree with you. Here’s mine.
- It may not be developed by Bethesda, but it was still published by them (eg. Max Payne; 2 devs, one publisher.)
- The events are canon to the stories of the originals and the Bethesda games.
- The games mechanics are ported straight from FO3
- It has major DLC expansions like all mainline Bethesda games since Oblivion
I mean, what even is mainline and what is a spin-off? I guess Bethesda must have called it a spin-off themselves for you to think that way. It’s literally equating New Vegas with Fallout Shelter.
@@bennyheadofthechairmen8808 I don’t know what you mean by canon. Because events in New Vegas are canon. They directly connect to the first 2 games and are mentioned in 4.
@@Niosai the fact that you make it sound like a fact by using "is definitely" is absolutely disgusting. Only the Wikipedia says that it's a spin-off and it's not even an official source, the fallout wiki says it isn't a direct sequel to 3 but is the fourth major installment in the series. So there's no official thing about it being a spin-off or not do you had to take the worst choice that makes you lose karma smh.
you said settlements are “almost entirely optional” unfortunately that isn’t really the case if you want to do the story And there was a few other small details you got wrong but otherwise really good video and I cannot wait to see more
I loved the classic fallout games... but i hate shooters. dont like it here, dislike and bye!
I'd like to think fallout 4 as movie instead of a game
a 12 hour movie
Not counting Fall: New Vegas as a main line game isn't very cash money.
Even the CEO of Obsidian doesn't consider it a mainline game 😢
Poor soul. He's gonna play brotherhood of steel
I've been warned already, wish me luck lmao
@@Niosai I'm straight up praying for you
19:41 Waiting was in the old Fallout games.
I beat the first two games multiple times. I didn't even finish fallout 4..Interplay shits on Bethesda.
I have to admit I dislike basically everything relating Fallout 4. The visuals are simply not the way the should've move foward, the dialogue options are simply a waste, the environment is not oppressive unless you get to the places were there is high radiation. Overall is not a bad game or anything but the role playing mechanics this series is played for are devolved somehow. I hope the simply make a game with depressive visuals and alike mechanics with the previous but expanding the already big lore
Fallout3 holds a dear place in my heart for being the first one I played back when it came out and I fell in love with the series. But New Vegas is the best one. I so hope they make another good one since 76 was a disaster
Fallout 2 is on of my top 3 favorite games and I love fallout 3 since it was my first and the dystopian cityscape. But fallout new Vegas is by far on of the best games ever made but it doesn’t take fallout 3 let alone the perfection of fallout 2.