@GilbertoDECampos thanks for watching, the main difference between a Patch vs ISO update process, was that the Patch needs to be download manually, updated manually & restart the Host server manually each time. Yes, very time consuming. While the ISO update can be done automatically albeit multiple restarts. Save a lot of hassles... hahaha... The Cons here is that ISO updates will simply determine the best patches available & do it for you automatically, not suitable in a production environment where you need to perform SIT & UAT to ensure 100% compatibility with the VMs. Some patches will break some old OS like CentOS 4 or Windows Server 2000 or worst your vLAN. So by doing an individual patch & SIT separately, will ensure better compatibility & also its the best practice.
Exactly what I was looking for... Thanks!
free of charge question :D : Is there any difference bewyeem a pactch and a iso update process?
@GilbertoDECampos thanks for watching, the main difference between a Patch vs ISO update process, was that the Patch needs to be download manually, updated manually & restart the Host server manually each time. Yes, very time consuming.
While the ISO update can be done automatically albeit multiple restarts. Save a lot of hassles... hahaha...
The Cons here is that ISO updates will simply determine the best patches available & do it for you automatically, not suitable in a production environment where you need to perform SIT & UAT to ensure 100% compatibility with the VMs. Some patches will break some old OS like CentOS 4 or Windows Server 2000 or worst your vLAN. So by doing an individual patch & SIT separately, will ensure better compatibility & also its the best practice.