Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
The Voices of differnt Communist/Socialist Leaders (Part 2)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 сер 2024
- 00:00 Yumjaagiin Tsedenval
00:10 Samoa Machel
00:20 Thomas Sankara
00:30 Mengistu Haile Mariam
00:40 Muammar Gaddafi
00:50 Saddam Hussein
01:00 Augustino Neto
01:10 Heng Samin
01:20 Hugo Chavez
01:30 Mathieu Kérékou
Sankara’s got one of the most powerful voices i’ve ever heard
He rather speak French
No shit hesblack
Sankara from my point of view was the most brilliant communist leader of all time
He was one of the most pro women leaders of all time he was the best African leader behind the leader of my country (gaddafi)
@@BasicallyNocolor yes but its still powerful
Both Saddam and Gaddafi were Arab Nationalist, Arab Socialist, and Pan-Arab. Both parties; which are the GPC/ASU and Ba’ath share similar ideology. Please don’t get confused over Socialism.
Baath is a petty bourgeois ideology which build on middle class military careerists. For Baath arab socialism is a the end goal rather than a means to an end. George Habash and Ghassan Kanafani exposed the bankruptcy of this ideology with a sound Arab socialist line on Palestine, Arab nationalism and armed resistance against zionism and imperialism.
They are still a socialist tho
@@Bubatz_braucher funny how before he died Nasser was one of the main backers of Habash.
Marxism is not the only form of socialism.
@@theArab__ Yeah Nasser blew life into Arab nationalism, but Habash' politics were always different than Nassers
Everyone: cool flags with red/yellow stars
Libya: *G R E E N*
Green is Islam's color in political spheres.
That's just Gaddafi regime flag.
Fucking Sankara, man. Dude could've really been a major player in history, but the cia couldn't have that. Then my boy Gaddafi made concession after concession, and still got couped.
Wait was it a revolution or coup?
@@sudanipropagandist6214 Both of them were defeated in US backed events, so it doesn't really matter. Also both Burkina Faso and Libya miss them a lot so it doesn't really matter if it was a revolution or not cos everyone regretted it right afterwards. Libya and Burkina Faso are shit now.
@@dracotitanfall Hillary and Obama literally returned SLAVERY (of black Africans mostly brought in!) to Libya, then performatively defend woke insanity at home. The elites are total psychos
@@sudanipropagandist6214 in Libya? It was a cia orchestrated, and backed jihadi revolt. Those supposed "moderate rebels" pretty much immediately set up slave markets, and started killing anyone who didn't bend the knee to their bullshit. Gaddafi wasn't perfect, but he was damn good at running a country, and it's a shame that our sick government managed to fuck over the Libyan people by killing him, and turning their country into what its become since his murder.
@@burninsherman1037 exactly
Sankara is that super cool Guy in school, who would stand up for you even if you aren't a Giga Chad as he is.
He is one of those few people who are perfect example of "perfection" in every aspect
Gadafi was not what You can call a Socialist, at least not in the usual sense. The Jamahiriya Ideology is quite hard to put in the same category as Marxist socialism. It is part of arab socialism, but it's at the same time Unique.
Socialism doesn’t have to be Marxist. Socialism, in the broadest definition, is defined as for the social good(socius), the community.
@@stoggafllik at least first change your name and profile picture 😶
@@Kamerad_Abdul17 You’re like 5. I don’t need to listen to you
He was a great leader just like Hussein. Now their countries are like shit thanks to America.
Which Socialist can say "Allahu Akbar"?
Sankara sounds badass.
No
Because he was
Kaddafi, Saddam Hussien, Chavez were not communists.
@@borisbaran shut up
@@borisbaran cope
0:00 Yumjaagiyn Tsedenbal: Mongolia 🇲🇳
0:10 Samora Machel: Mozambique 🇲🇿
0:20 Thomas Sankara: Burkina Faso 🇧🇫
0:30 Mengistu Haile Mariam: Etiopía 🇪🇹
0:40 Muammar Gaddafi: Libia 🇱🇾
0:50 Saddam Hussein: Irak 🇮🇶
1:00 António Agostinho Neto: Angola 🇦🇴
1:10 Heng Samrin: Camboya 🇰🇭
1:20 Hugo Chávez: Venezuela 🇻🇪
1:30 Mathieu Kérékou: Benín 🇧🇯
You spelled Cambodia wrong
I’m not mad
Just want to tell you
@@myshart7955 It's in Spanish
0:01
Failed economic systens
1:10
Finally, the Cambodian populous were free to wear some glasses.
Ahhh, yes, Pol Pot doesn't like this
@@josip_is_badass7287 yes becaus Heng Saminbecause has glasses
@@josip_is_badass7287 mummar gadafi and sdaam are not comminist
Lol dark 😂
@@Alperen_07950 They are Arab socialists comrade
Samoa Machel Is saying: each people is independent to choose it's friends, each people is independent to choose it's allies.
Thanks
Calling Saddam a socialist is an insult to every authoritarian ideology.
ba'athists are nominally socialist and took their revolutionary warfare plans from leninism
He was a Baathist, that's an arab socialis movement and part of the bigger pan arabic movement. He was a socialist regardless of what you think.
@Jean Sanchez the DPRK is socialist tho. And so was Saddam.
@Jean Sanchez It sounds like you are saying that socialism is not authoritarian.
@Jean Sanchez what makes you think that? Dictating how, when and where the resourcers in a society should be allocated, is authoritarian by definition. Destroying the individual's control of private property Will always bê authoritarian, theres no way to escape that, socialists should accept the authoritarian characteristics of their own ideology. And also, every single socialist in history DESPISE freedom. I really dont know where you get that from.
Arab socialist ideologies cannot be classified as normal socialist, they are far closer to national (without the extreme racism part) or strictly agrarian socialism
No, WITH the racism part. Lots of it.
And the kurds killed by Saddam? Nothing? That wasn't racism?
@@dr.nihilus2632 jesus christ yall really gotta nitpick
@@dr.nihilus2632 they were against sadam when Iraq in war with Iran, so they take advantage from war
@@borisbaran zionist detected
Sankara sounds really cool.
0:32 he's actually still alive. He's currently in exile in Zimbabwe. Apparently, Ethiopian government has been pressing for his extradition, because he committed mass murder. If he were to go back, they'd put him to death.
The "funny" thing is all the next governments that came after him have been doing basically the same thing...
Africa for you, ladies and gentlemen.
Poor man.
@@kholeka8475
No not really. When he was president, he insisted that his colleagues formally address him as if he's emperor of Ethiopia, instead of using the one to address each other in a familiar fashion, like how members of the politbureau would refer to each other as "tovarish".
@@seanturner1197
Your source and point is?
@@seanturner1197 actually everyone called him ጓድ መንግሥቱ (gwad Mengistu) the equivalent of Tovarich Mengistu or ጓድ ፕሬዝደንት (Gwad president) Tovarich President.
Thomas Sankara, ultimate gigachad
Genuinely one of the most promising leaders to have existed, with a life tragically cut short by French interference
@@isetta4083 I thought he was assassinated by the Belgians.
Meh, your typical Third World dictator.
@@borisbaran 😂👀 Ain't typical. Brought development. Cope harder you 2 franc troll.
@@sodamanfromsodaland1548 Nah, French owned Burkina Faso and wanted to take out Sankara.
You're probably thinking of Patrice Lumumba.
Sankara was one of the greatest socialist leaders in history and 90% of westerners don’t know him because he gives socialism a good name lmao
He was good up until he got super paranoid. (I only know the basics of this era of Burkinese(?) history. Please do educate me further if you wish to)
@Wisconcom "He mass-purged anti-revisionists". Source?
@Wisconcom I couldn't find some source about this topic, the information about the Burkina Fasso's parties is extremely limited in my language. I only found the information about the purges of Blaise Campaoré in 1987 in the Human Rights Library.
Sankara was never paranoid, he wasn’t scared to die. But there were a few socialist leaders paranoid such as Stalin (if he can count as socialist) this makes them even more authoritarian and more blood thirsty
He was a good leader regardless of ideology he was what Africa needed
As a brazilian honestly was kind of funny hear the mozambique leader voice and understand everything he said
Angola?
As an Argentine I was able to understand it too xd
Muito engraçado brasileiro que que pensa que só Portugal, Brasil e Angola fala português
@@leni4179 em nenhum momento eu disse que só o Brasil fala português
Can you translate what he said?? I'm curious to know
Saddam Hussein is not a socialist or communist leader!
He was a Fascist. Saddam meets its criteria.
He was literally the leader of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party
He is. Baathists are arab socialists.
yeah, he's the leader of my heart ✊😔💔
@@MrAngryBender horrible leader
Never really cared much for communism, however, I think it's really cool to pair some of these faces with voices
If someone says they don’t like socialism, I encourage them to think about what they know of it
@@hiera1917 he said communism, not socialism
@@stopmotionharry8989 people usually interchange the two (though yeah they are different), but what many would usually be referring to is Socialism, as any disliking of Communism comes from a philosophical perspective as it has never been attempted in history. Socialism has, however
@@Javier-rl1of communism has absolutely been attempted, I mean the USSR was founded with the intention of being communist, it’s just never been successfully implemented
@@Piersmarchant Not at all. Communism is the end goal for any Socialist, but you have to reach a socialist state before you reach communism. The USSR *tried* to reach a successful Socialist state. I will not argue the efficacy nor validity of their attempts, but it is well established they were not Communist.
How can the Soviet Union, a large international empire, be Communist when that very ideology requires a society to be classless and stateless?
Yumjaagiin Tsedenval sounds like he is about to collapse from a heart attack.
Yes
Kaddafi, Saddam Hussien, Chavez were not communists.
Saddam Hussein was nothing!
@@umfilhodedeustotalmenteama5522 Chavez was definitely communist buddy
@@umfilhodedeustotalmenteama5522 Fr shut up
Love these videos! Please more of them!
Sankara is so chad even his speech have villain music playing
What the Mozambique leader said: Each people is independent to pick its friends, each people is independent to pick its allies
Angola leader says something abou political progress
Does exist a record with voice of gheorghe gheorghiu-dej? Just asking
I don't know
@@josip_is_badass7287 eo Brasil???😡
Neto sounds like a gentle man, very appropriate for a poet revolutionary who was pushed into an impossible situation.
Sankara is an interesting and underrepresented person
I got excited when I saw there’s a new part 2
at first im mongolian and i saw tsedenbal and i thought he would speak mongol but holy shit i didnt expect that he speaks russian fluently
Of course he would know Russian everyone who lived during the Cold War knows Russian my grandpa studied in Moscow, my Grandma too studied in Moscow my dad and mom learned Russian my sister went to a Russian school. Though huduu people probably don’t speak it much but хот people from Cold War era know it also the Soviet soldiers stationed here
Two other suggestions - Kwame Nkrumah and my man Julius Nyerere?
Thaaanks. He should also add Siyad Barre
Calling Saddam Hussein socialist is like calling Hitler Anarchist.
Thats a retarded comparison
@@sudanipropagandist6214 Ok
Yumjaagin Tsedenval - Mongolia
Samora Machel - Mozambique
Thomas Sankara - Burkina Faso
Mengistu Haile Mariam - Ethiopia
Muammar Gaddafi - Libya
Saddam Hussein - Iraq
Augustino Neto - Angola
Heng Samin - Kampuchea
Hugo Chavez - Venezuela
Mathieu Kérékou - Benin
Maybe you can find France Albert Rene's voice somewhere... Would be really nice!
Mengistu has been cruel and not so smart, BUT, he honestly worked for the country with all neighbouring countries against him, with Somalia declaring war against Ethiopia, te US aiding terrorist groups, Sudan and Kenya hosting terrorists and rebel groups...
I hate him for his cruelty and him not being so smart, but I admire him for the educational reforms he did and for not plundering the country when he escaped.
I mean, who would have been able to govern a country under such harsh circumstances without being brutal?
You country is in a VERY bad shape before you even took over, pretty much all you nation's neighbours declare war on you, Somalia invades with a much more advanced and organised Military in a brutal Blitz Krieg, Civil War, Separatists and Tribalism are threatening to violently rip your country apart, political rivals and divide is everywhere, droughts are causing more and more food shortages and almost the entire world hates and force isolates you.
The land reform was good too.
RIP Gaddafi & Sankara & Hussein
Most impressive leaders of their time.
Impressively shitty. They were bloody dictators, they deserved what happened to them in the end.
most impressive corruptors
@@Loli4lyf ok but I mean, you can't really deny the positives they've done to their countries. It's really not that black & white like most people think it is.
Sankara genuinely tried to make his country better and the people in it gaddafi and saddam on the other hand
@@atallitalian7816
Gaddafi did try though and his positives are that he did raise literacy rates, establishing welfare programs, furthered women and men's roles into society, and having to build the largest waterway to connect the desert cities and bring clean water to people, etc. One of the things that lead to his downfall was having to be isolated from West which caused his country to suffer and only got helped by Ba'athist Iraq until 2003, it was very stagnated and even tried reforming the Government at the time.
Saddam was brutal no denying in that, but the positives he's done is that he helped raised literacy raised to 90% which before was 24%, paving roads, women became equal to men. farmers were granted land, curbing hunger and his welfare programs welfare were the best in the Middle East. He even secularized the country and granted Christians protection while Islam being the dominate religion of Iraq.
These leaders weren't Saints but definitely didn't had to go out the way they did because of the West's involvement, they were strong anti-imperialist leaders.
All videos the voices came from:
Yumjaagiin Tsedenbal: ua-cam.com/video/BSf32jy4vhA/v-deo.html
Samora Machel: ua-cam.com/video/VHQWa3YjxC8/v-deo.html
Thomas Sankara: ua-cam.com/video/LVKgvakY_Io/v-deo.html
Mengistu Haile Mariam: ua-cam.com/video/NNXpehMnugI/v-deo.html
Muammar Gaddafi: ua-cam.com/video/ewb9scEI_Hk/v-deo.html
Saddam Hussein: ua-cam.com/video/jsN28uhcvTc/v-deo.html
Augustino Neto: ua-cam.com/video/Ww8aEki0CEE/v-deo.html
Heng Samrin: ua-cam.com/video/dezHK28q7kI/v-deo.html
Hugo Chavez: ua-cam.com/video/lFzbqFcePp8/v-deo.html
Mathieu Kérékou: ua-cam.com/video/ZJWT0khnRaM/v-deo.html
This took me DAYS to find all the videos, please like
The anti imperialist struggle will never die. We must keep fighting.
Yeah the communist will still killing people for hunger
We are winning! Africa, Latin America, and Asia are all raising red flags! China and Russia are spearheading the first challenge to American hegemony in 30 years, and America is FAR worse equipped this time around. With rising fascism the last act of this hundred year global class war will be needlessly bloody, but as was foresaw hundreds of years ago, communism will win. 🛠🗺💙⚖️
Cool to hear a couple ones that I can actually understand. :P
I wonder if there are recordings of Jean Jaurès… was the technology available before 1914? Léon Blum or Maurice Thorez should be findable though.
No, Jean Jaurès is not findable.
But Maurice Thorez and Léon Blum have some of their speeches recorded and easily available.
Kaddafi, Saddam Hussien, Chavez were not communists.
Listening to chavez again reminds me how FUCKING carismatic he was, now i get why people voted for him in the 98 is amazing how he turned venezuela into what is now and there is people who still loves him
he wasn’t the one who turned the country into what it is now that’s just Maduro’s dumbass. Under Chavez Venezuela was actually prospering
Most of the people hate him in Venezuela including in my province when he born (barinas)
@@Doki777 eh i am pretty sure it’s mostly the business man that hate him but i am pretty sure many poor people liked him
What turned Venezuela into "what it is now" is American economic warfare.
@@Yet.Another.Rapper.KiG.V2 JAJAJAJAJ THE BEST Fking joke someone can say to me I'm Venezuelan bro talking to me about what is happening is dumb, i still live in Venezuela and i know people how knew Chavez and since the start he knew what was goig to happen to the country since the start venezuela was going to bankrupt with chavez and his crew on the leadership
Actually there is nothing interesting in this voices... But it's interesting
Waiting for part 3
People actually doesn't know how they sound like, also in my first part I uploaded many doesn't know how they sound like
@@josip_is_badass7287 can you do Bhagatsingh/Subhash Chandra Bose any one of them?
Say what you want about Socialists and Communists; non-European Socialist leaders have better drip than their non-Socialist counterparts.
Do a modern day socialists and communists next!
Deng Xiaoping, Xi Jinping, Evo Morales, Kim Jong-un, Hu Jintao, Nicolas Maduro, I'm sure there are many others (I'm not sure who is president of Laos, Vietnam, Cuba etc. today)
@@WhatThisClassNeeds I am unfamiliar with him, though I'm sure he must he pretty cool considering that Cuba is still keeping strong on the socialist path and taking care of its people
Miguel Diaz-Canel is the president of Cuba and he’s a really charismatic speaker! You should listen to one of his speeches sometime
Nicholas Maduro isn’t a socialist lmao
@@Proxyyy825 Yes, he is. And before you say something stupid, I am Venezuelan and a political scientist.
>Deng, Xi, Hu, Kim, Maduro
>Socialist
brainrot
Gaddafi spoke very good English. There are recordings of him from the late 1960s speaking very fluently and clearly.
The dictator who made Libya in Green and I Love green and it was my favourite colour until Rebels destroyed it😥😡✊🟢 00:40
America's Worst Enemy: 00:50
Venezuela Y México Hermanos: 01:20
0:00 Юмжаагийн Цэдэнбал
0:10 Samoa Machel
0:20 Thomas Sankara
0:30 መንግሥቱ ኀይለ ማሪያም
0:40 معمر القذافي
0:50 صدام حسين
1:00 Agostinho Neto
1:10 ហេង សំរិន
1:20 Hugo Chávez
1:30 Mathieu Kérékou
Apparently Heng Samin forgot to seize the means of producing intelligible audio.
Siyaad Barre of Somali Democratic Republic had a chad voice. Missed opportunity to add him.
Heng Samin one is inintelligible ! Feels like it's a spy record behind a wall
Khmer language (?)
As a brazilian, i could understand what Samoa Michel and Augustino Neto said (these countries were Portuguese colonies, as Brazil was, and therefore we have the same linguistic heritage) and I could imagine what we would listen to if a socialist leader ever ascended to power here in Brazil
Cadê meu Luiz Carlos Prestes 😭😭😭 cadê minha Olga Benário 😭😭😭😭 meu Jorge Amado 😭😭
What is Augustino Neto saying?
@@joaquinrivera6112 "political progress for the people from both countries"
Can you translate it?? I'm curious
@@adityahubli6517
Samoa Michel: Each people is independent to choose its friends. Each people is independent to choose its own allies.
1:10 If the audio quality of this was also video quality, it would be like a bank camera.
Chavez que haces aquí?
esa no es tu familia!
jajaja muy buen video bro
sería bueno uno de la voz de todos los socialistas
Heng Samin sounds like he put his microphone in a toilet
Hi there! I liked both videos and I even found it interesting because as I am Brazilian, I understood the speech of Angola as well as Mozambique and Latin countries. I loved seeing these figures from different countries that I intend to study more, good job!
Suggestion: Some Brazilian communists, such as Carlos Prestes, Carlos Marighella and Jorge Amado.
Unfortunately, Marighella's voice is only available in an "okay" quality (ua-cam.com/video/RmKidmTURuo/v-deo.html), since this audio was taken from an invasion of Brazilian radio during the military dictatorship.
Carlos Prestes (ua-cam.com/video/H9XlQq9I8ws/v-deo.html) and Jorge Amado (ua-cam.com/video/nQ0Y3SpVVbc/v-deo.html) just have their voices recorded when they were already very old.
liked how you could clearly hear heng samin
my mongolians doesnt have russian language now but were reuniting our traditional language BACK!!!!
in this socialism era, they were under soviet's power. so sad we have russian letters now.
Thomas sankara was the next che guevara
Good content and consistent uploads. New sub!!!
0:50 relax guy.
Translation ( 0:00 - 0:09 )
Yumjaagiin Tsedenval - We express our heartfelt gratitude to the Central Committee of the CPSU for inviting
*Original - Мы выражаем нашу сердечную благодарность центральному комитету КПСС за приглашание / My vyrazhayem nashu serdechnuyu blagodarnostʹ tsentralʹnomu komitetu KPSS za priglashaniye
Who cares about a reliable translation without holes, I can translate the national languages the USSR into English by ear. The main thing is to write down what to translate
@@NirvanaUA U mad?
Libya’s flag is creative
Mengistu is a very underrated revolutionary leader. Many of us unfortunately dont appreciate him and the Derg because they believe on that bullsh*t about ""Red Terror"" and ""famine"", but he led a revolutionary coup that overthrew a feudal monarchy, nationalized enterprises, made land reform, revolutionary defense committes and a Cultural Revolution. Unfortunately he was overthrown by the same ones that now plunged Ethiopia in Civil War. He is still alive in Zimbabwe, hope he can come back to power one day, i heard some Ethiopian ministers even met him some times and took smiling photos with him.
Dude is old as fuck. He won't do good.
Agreed, but he did use hunger as a weapon though.
@@kholeka8475 The red terror was an actual thing. He purged Ethiopia's intellectuals. Whatever good he did is massively outshined by his bads.
@@mwanikimwaniki6801 Yes, because of the circumstances he had to govern that already broken country and government.
@@kholeka8475 There's no justification for killing all those people no matter how you put it
Saddam Hussein is the only normal looking photo, he actually looks kinda friendly. (Don’t go to the comments and say that he is evil, I know that, just out of all the dudes, he looks like a regular person, even more without context)
What about the first guy?
Many communists look like regular people, because they are. You should look into the upbringing and daily life of a lot of these people, it's very inspiring. Saddam, however, IMO I'd not a socialist and doesn't deserve to be with these other people (nor Pol Pot or Gorbachev in the last video)
ngl Saddam and Mussolini both are "le ebil dictators" that look kind of chill and I wouldn't mind hanging out with for a day.
Mengistu Hailemariam፦ፋሽስታዊ የሆነ ወረራ በሚያካሂዱና የመስፋፋት ዓላማ ባላቸው፤ የሱማሌ መንግስትና የጦር ሃይላቸው መሀከልና ተከላካይ በሆነው።
Maybe in part 3 could be Lázaro Cárdenas, Mexican president during 1934-1940.
And Lula and Dilma ftom Brazil
more relaxing than all asmr videos
Nice video. I'm pretty sure Gaddafi and Hussein are not communist or socialist though
Qaddafi was a socialist, although he was very odd, you can see more from the Green Book.
Saddam was also a socialist.
Neither were communist tho.
Quite the collection. Many of the leaders are ones I've read, or heard about, but had no idea what they sounded like. Thanks.
Can't wait for part 3
Slightly surprised not to have heard the voices of any East German leaders, such as Walter Ulbricht, Erich Honecker and Egon Krentz to be honest
That was in the previous vid
check out Part 1.
R.I.P Gaddafi
Thomas Sankara sounded like a giga
In that photo Mathieu Kérékou was looking at Ceaușescu's face when Ceaușescu laughed and smilled.
1:00 *Agostinho
Why is there not Maurice Bishop
Long live the glorious and honorable Thomas Sankara! The only truly good dictator ever!
heng samrin's recording sounds like he was trapped underwater
You forgot about Yemen Syria Egypt and Afganistan as well as Grenada Comrade
it wasnt a leader, but i think manuel marulanda velez deserves one rank there. He was a colombian rebel consider the most veteran guerrilla in the world, founder of the revolutionary armed forces of colombia (FARC)
And where Is Abimael Guzman, Jose Carlos Mariátegui And Velazco Alvarado?
Hugo Chávez's voice is heard empowered like that of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara
Thomas Sankara is Good Leader.
Bro is Samora not Samoa
Oh....
Libya: other peoples flag are cool, but mine are plain then ever.
Im mongolian cant understand tsendenbal i think u found russian translated one
You forgot Laos btw.
Saddam and Gaddafi were third position (national socialism but not nazi)
Saddam never considered himself third position. The Arab Socialist Ba’ath party ever since it’s founding by Aflaq, Al Bitar, Arsuzi and Hawrani considered itself as Left wing. As for Qaddafi it’s more complicated.
@@theArab__
Ghaddafi called himself socialist and his policies were left-wing with conservative traditionalism.
The voice of hen samin, like the voice of half a sweat, sounds from the underworld of hell
What me a non native Arabic speaker hears: Alhaharrarkelalalala~~ 😆😄
0:41 Libya 100% only green flag
0% Drugs
0% Weapons
0% Naked Women
100% Green Libya
Where is Laos communist leaders like Kaysone Phomvihane ?
I forgot him, sorry about that
@@josip_is_badass7287 no worries you make a very good work/content please continue i absolutely like it 👍
Hugo chavez or Samora machel voices make Matthew kerekou funny
Westerners have some kind of racist problem against Gaddaffi. He was one of the best president of Libya. He provided free electricity. There was no job problem. Education quality was brilliant.
Nope his economy reliant on oil was doomed to fail, his diversification efforts failed, and the country was only self-sufficient in water and electricity (they were gonna run out of taht source of electricity anyways though) and not food. Most unforgivably he bombed planes and assassinated Thomas Sankara, if you don't believe me read "Thomas Sankara: A revolutionary in Cold War Africa"
Rest in peace, Muammar al-Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein!
We really gonna argue if Saddam was socialist but not Chavez? Chavez economy was 33% state owned, Saddam's was 82% state owned, need I say more? Also Gaddafi is a third positionist, and an idealist. Praise the Organic State, death to materialists.
There is a lot more to socialism than simply the ratio of state owned versus private enterprises. Gaddafi is more of a socialist (especially earlier in his career) than Saddam ever was. And I really don't understand you claiming "death to materialists."
@@Yet.Another.Rapper.KiG.V2 Saddam was one of the most major socialist leaders out there my guy. I have many family members who were Iraqi Ba'athists, and one of them was Saddam's security guard. And yes, socialism is literally state ownership of property, in terms of Marxian socialism, Marx himself says in the communist manifesto that "the theory of socialism can be summarized in one sentence: abolition of private property." Also in case you didn't catch on with the last part of my comment, I am a Fascist.
@@um.pa.s.s.a.3043 From what I understand of Saddam he was more of an opportunist and a nationalist than anything else. He did indeed have a high level of nationalized industry but he also privatized quite a lot of it as time went on. He murdered and suppressed all of the communists in Iraq, yes in part to remain independent from the USSR but I also believe because he was deeply opposed to them ideologically.
Abolition of private property is certainly part of it but if this was the end-all be-all then modern day Russia would be socialist--they are certainly more capable of renewing socialism than, say, America, and the fact that they still have some major industries nationalized helps this fact, but it's not the end-all be-all. Likewise China is not any less socialist just because the CPC carefully administers capitalism for the end-goal of socialism by any means necessary, their special economic zones fit neatly within their socialist framework, although yes this was a potential "in" for the cancer of capitalism and if not for the anti corruption campaigns by Hu and Xi it could have turned out very differently for China and its path towards socialism.
And yes, that is what I assumed when you said that but I didn't want to jump the gun so to speak. Cheers for being honest I suppose. Since you seem more rational than most fascists I run in to I hope you will find something better to hate than materialists, what a waste.
@@Yet.Another.Rapper.KiG.V2 so firstly, I'd appreciate a counter definition to socialism for your end, since you have stated simply having state owned enterprise is not socialism. Secondly, Lenin repressed other communist parties, because different forms of socialism or communism have different means to the goal, and are thus ideologically divided, this is also similar to how Stalin expelled and later assassinated Trotsky. Also Saddam himself was allied with the USSR, so I don't see how he didn't want to be dependent on them, since all his tanks were Soviet made, like the T-62, and so we're the firearms, like the Tabuk rifle, an Iraqi rendition of the AK-47, even consumer cars for civilians were Soviet made, like Moskavich and Volga. And the communist party, similar to the Kurds and Kurdish Resistance, were rebelling, so he had to take action, also mind you that Communism =/= Socialism, a socialist can hate a communist, similar to how Paleo conservatives and Neo conservatives hate eachother. Also my point still stands, if socialists are steadfast to defend Venezuela and call Venezuela socialist, but not Iraq, then they are idiots, since Iraq was more socialist, or socialistic, than Venezuela, by far. Btw, Saddam grew a moustache and styled it after Josef Stalin, because of how much he admired him, just an fyi. Finally, I must stand by what I say, state ownership by all means = socialism, in the eyes of a socialist, the state is a representation of the collective interests of the populous (which are the workers), and all states function as such. And materialism is fundamentally opposed to the acknowledgement of groups and collective consciousness, how can I not hate them? To be a collectivist and a materialist is contradictory.
@@um.pa.s.s.a.3043 Personally I always saw the one-line definition of socialism as the classic "worker ownership of the means of production," or in my own words "worker ownership of the economy and political body," which IMO is done most successfully with the Marxist-Leninist style of a vanguard party that represents the interests of the workers that oppresses the bourgeois once it captures power. This style pursues socialism by any means necessary, including but not limited to some very pragmatic and unideologically "pure" decisions to preserve power of the proletarian dictatorship first and foremost, such as the Chinese buying peace and time to develop from the Western capitalist hegemony by opening up themselves in a limited amount to foreign capital, markets, and thus relinquishing some state control. Essentially, in my eyes, they are socialist because they truly had the intention of doing such things to fulfill socialism, a different country or ruling party could have mimicked the exact same policies for quite different ends. I myself was only very comfortable finally acknowledging China was socialist when I learned about how since the pragmatic Dengist reforms that they have pursued an anti-corruption and capitalist suppression campaign, and a pivot towards spreading the winnings of this development with the average populace as well as a more confrontational attitude with the West and the global class war.
I think you made some good points about leftist infighting and Iraq, I will have to research Saddam some more myself because perhaps you are right.
I do not understand what you mean when you say materialism is "opposed to the acknowledgement of groups." As a communist in 2022 I am also an intersectionalist and while I believe there are core things we all share I also believe the way we are raised conditions our way of thinking and thus behavior. I, for example, would say that there is little scientific, genetic difference between races (if that is an example of what you mean by "groups") but as we are all product of our circumstances, and many of us have very different circumstances, that the end result is people of different races or geographic location or gender or social class etc. do indeed seem to resemble each other in some ways and differ from other peer groups in some ways.
As far as "collective unconsciousness," I will say that I am a spiritualist and I too believe in such things. Many communists are vehemently anti-religious and even anti-spiritual, but I see this as reactive, a distaste borne from religion often being little more than an appendage of capitalist power. However, I know Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, pagan, Buddhist, as well as atheist communists. Likewise I am sure you have seen fascists of all these aforementioned groups, I know I have. While I myself have many beliefs and practices that some of my comrades might call "esoteric" at best or "woo-woo brainrot" at worst, I have also connected with some on such grounds and yet I still consider myself a materialist. I believe the seemingly paranormal and metaphysical are simply things we have yet to understand, much how something like electricity would have seemed like magic a mere few hundred years ago--and in many ways, I see no reason something like electricity shouldn't still be called magic. Hell, IMO even something so seemingly simple and familiar as the act of talking or writing is putting forth the force of your will onto this reality, both in a physical and ephemeral way, and also is magic. I'll cut myself short before I completely derail but while I can agree that many people let something like materialism limit their perspective, many people too let it expand their perspective. Materialism as it exists in practice, immutable interconnected with its historical and cultural context, might lead people away from the spiritual in many scenarios, but materialism at its core, and its core prescriptions, is not at all at odds with spiritualism (or whatever you would call the opposite), in fact IMO they complement each other beautifully.
Jos jedan dobar video.: )
Бро, спасибо за видео)
Part 3 with Suharto, mahatir Mohamed & Ferdinand Marcos
Suharto was a capitalist dictator lol. Maybe you thinking about Sukarno.
@@loveliness1219 oh
0:22 the only one I can understand because he’s speaking French
And what about Kerekou, is he speaking french too, isn't?
@@andrescastillocastillo8120 yes
And I understand the Mongolian one, he speaks Russian
Kérekou?
-Communist/Socialist
-Saddam Hussein
Why burkina faso have ambience (?) in the bg? It sounds like he's from a movie.
0:39 look at that glorious editing