makes you wonder whos really the bad guy in this story lol, the fallen angels that rebelled against god to help man, or god for all the extinction level events he calls "salvation".
they sold/ate kids in this generation. plus only noah and his family were fully human. everyone else mixed their genes with the offspring of the nephilim and were all equally lawless, barbaric and insatiable.
No, it was an allusion to the actual scripture where the first rainbow was used to symbolize gods covenant to the survivors that he would never send another flood like Noah’s again.
@jbadger30 allusion. And it was the sign of a pact between God and man. That god would not flood again. I candidly forgot what humanities part was. The really messed up part was the flood predates the 10 commandments so these people really had no way to know they tempted fate this hard.
It’s more like a warning for every time it stops raining. Like god warning you, your lucky you haven’t pissed me off, I could have just flooded everything and drowned you, but I didn’t!
OMG that's hilarious, the Chinese reference! Must have been reading Prof. Birn: “For many the most disturbing immediate problem posed by the discovery of China was its impact on the historical veracity of the Bible. According to the calculations of the Jesuit scholar Martini, the Celestial Empire had been founded 660 years before the accepted date of the biblical deluge. However, Chinese annals contained no reference to the Flood. Could it therefore have been merely a local episode, important only to Jews and their immediate neighbors? Some scholars estimated that East Asian civilizations were flourishing even before the accepted date of Adam’s Fall. Was it possible then that Adam was the ancestor of the Jews alone, and not of humanity at large? China past and present either was calling to question the universal character of Christianity, or else it was placing doubt on the accuracy of biblical chronology.” - Raymond Birn, Crisis, Absolutism, Revolution: Europe 1648 to 1789 (2nd Ed., 1992), p. 169.
Or could it simply be that we humans cannot understand the ways of the Almighty God. "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:8-9 ESV
@@Grumpy-Curmudgeon Oh please. I know it's Sunday and all that, but the God that humans understand was created by humans in the human image of our parents. As Darrow said, the only honest answer is "We don't know."
"Just the locals" can be interpreted as Aziraphale being clueless... but also for the event to be REALLY just a local phenomenon. The angel mentions cultures that lived through the time of the supposed global flood, after all
except it wasnt a local phenomena and it was global. i dont believe in god but the global flood definitely happened and is referenced all over the world.
@@kp-legacy-5477except there is zero evidence for a global flood. Even the flood myths aren't universal - unsurprisingly, they are exclusive of cultures linked to coastlines and large river systems, where flood happens
@@kp-legacy-5477there is no concrete proof of it, and even the supposed references all over the world don't support it. Flood myths are virtually exclusive of cultures linked to coastlines and large river systems... unsurprisingly, as these are places where floods happen
I love how Aziraphale has this face you have when you try to consciously NOT THINK AT ALL. Because he knows if he does let himself think, he'll fall instantly due to being completely outraged at God's plan.
Yet American conservatives would ban books dealing with teen suicide but not the Bible when God killed everyone with the flood or ask Job to kill his children.
The god described in the old testament also commanded multiple genocides (in addition to the flood) and openly encouraged rape and slavery. It is a moral monster and definitely not worthy of praise.
Its just to prove hes the g.o.d. He can do as very much as he please. You can go robin william yourself if you dont agree with that. Or would you like to fight him? And dont worry those kids are well taken care of. None of them going to hell.
In any religion, the Gods have always had a rather cruel nature, even if they were described as “all-loving.” The reason for this is that any God, like any religion, is a creation of the human mind, human imagination, and people, by nature, are not alien to cruelty, to one degree or another. In addition, the priests of any religion always needed to keep other people within the framework of certain rules and prohibitions, and to support these prohibitions, especially when it came to ancient, dark and superstitious humanity, the easiest way was with stories like this - about the wrath of the gods, about punishments, which may fall on the heads of heretics and unbelievers. For this reason, I personally more like, in terms of mythology and approach, by various ancient pagan beliefs, such as, for example, the German-Scandinavian pantheon of gods, or the ancient Greek one, where the gods, at least, were more “humane”, with their own vices and problems, and were not “hidden” under the guise of “all-loving and all-knowing beings” by those who preach religion
I love every time Crowley mentions "kids" there are always both human children and infant goats in the next scene. You think he means the children, but he's probably actually worried about the goats!
Throughout the entire bible, the devil only kills less than a dozen people (and some of those were on god's order). God commits genocide repeatedly, either himself, or he tells his chosen people to do it. Divine morals, sure :P
Natives had a flood. Only, instead of taking place in the middle of their mythology, it’s at the beginning. Summary: Lots of humans at war, big flood wipes it away, leaving only a rabbit (Nanabozho) and some animals, the rabbit swims down to rescue the animals and then swims the furthest down to reach some earth, which is placed on a turtle back to carry their new home. That’s the creation story of the Ojibwe
@@thatguy3968 Native American mythos tend to swap animals in the stories depending whise tribe is telling. For example, look at the origin myth of dead and whose animal is responsible for it.
Cherry-picking at it's finest. The Flood story that preceeded the Noah story was just that - a flood. And the patriach saved his farm and family by putting the family and his livestock on a raft.
You do realize that there were as many creation and destruction stories as there were tribes, right? There is no single "flood story". Not all had a flood story at all.
What was it he said to get everyone so upset with him? Be kind to each other. Oh yeah that’ll do it. Possibly my favorite exchange in the whole series.
Yup. And then the line about how he showed him all the kingdoms. "Why?" "He's a carpenter from Galielee, his travel opportunities are limited." That line coming from Tennant is such meta irony or the like, Im wondering if that was written before he was cast.
God being upset with the Eskimos, the Chinese, the Australians and the Patagonians for ¿¿reasons?? was something that always bothered me as a child. Crawley's horrified reaction to the Allmighty plans of biblical extermination is hilarious. Just the locals, mind you. "Surely not the kids?? You can't kill kids!"
A relatively modern sentiment tbh. Children would grow up to be revenge-seeking adults, so eliminating them was considered for millennia to be pro-actively curtailing a future problem.
@@danieldickson8591 Not sure about that. Don't think the Buddhists would have seen child killing as a necessary evil from time to time. And the Chinese would have needed children to be alive and grow up to defend their empire against the Mongols. Flooding the whole world was a dick move of God's. Humans couldn't destroy God so self-defence couldn't be used as an excuse. And if God was smart and moral, teaching us humans would have been the Creator's job. The Bible is just Jews behaving very badly and claiming, falsely it was God's Will and Plan. Nope.
Aziraphale being taken aback is hilarious. A demon disgusted by what someone who thinks they are saving the world would do. Heroes really are the worst villains.
I don't think for a moment Aziraphale thinks he's saving the world or, deep down, approves of the drowning plan. If you look at the subtle details of his acting here, especially his tiny hesitation when he says "As a promise not to--drown everyone again" I think it's clear he's deeply uncomfortable with this but won't or can't admit it to himself.
I don't love this show, I don't know what it is, but episode 3 where its just the two characters meeting up throughout history was brilliant. A lot of really funny stuff like David's delivery at the end, "How kind..."
Aah. So much love coming from this christian god. So much, people are gonna drown in it, literally drown in god's love. Even the kids. In agony. But don't worry, it's love. He loves them, that much.
If life really is just a tiny little thing then one could understand how little it means to a higher being. But then same higher being decides your eternal punishment/reward based on said life so... something is definitely off. Reincarnation sounds so much more logical.
@@martialme84You mean just death being the end? I don't think that actually sounds most logical. Anything else we look at in the universe seems to exist in a cycle of changing states, the old being reused in a new form until it also becomes old and changes. (It does sound more logical than getting another go round as a human with deep memories, or a home in the sky for all the good behaving mind/souls.)
@@willchurch8376 There is literally not one piece of evidence for a person's life not just being over. Your "cycles of changing states" is just "the carbon that was part of a living thing, is now burning merrily in a lil fire". You're just afraid and you're making up stories to feel better about it.
@@willchurch8376In a sense we are a ‘reincarnation’ of all the living things who’s matter we used to make up our body. I doubt our brains contain much matter that was once part of another human’s brain tissue though.
The Old Testament is fucking insane when you think about it for more than five seconds. But that’s not very surprising, people didn’t have the same consistency and storytelling standards than we do now *MANY MILLENIA AGO*
TBH, this is legit one of the major flaws with looking at the bible the way you might look at any other authored book. It's a collection of stories, written by many we don't know, adaptations of stories that were popular at the time and translated from another language(s). This is why the tone, is inconsistent between the old and new testament and many of the stories imo. Hell the whole "great flood" story was practically ripped from the epic of Gilgamesh.
Satan is not really evil he was made to be perfect the best of them all so he rebelled cause he thought God was wrong he was right. so God wanted to get rid of him cause he made him better and Perfect is not evil
Wait a sec, why is Aziraphale calling them the Native Americans? There's not dispute on their origins at this point in time, at this point in time, they're the Americans. I mean yes the connotations of that by example are terrible, but, it's accurate, isn't it?
when people say god is nice and all good and im just like sorry he probubly the worst god when it comes who who is better to his people nothing agent religion just find it strange they say thats nice to wipe out people
If you're complaining because they use the word 'Australia' just pretend it's updated through a time filter because they didn't have America then either, or China by that name and they weren't speaking English.
"Per the bible..." Yeah? Which part of the bible? You do realize it contains hundred of separate books written over millennia by hundreds of different people, right? And that it isn't historical reporting? You might as well say, "Per Grimm's Fairy Tales..."
My favorite is the “Native” Americans. Why reference them that way during this point of history? (Assuming this isn’t being presented as a translation like in Lord of the Rings.)
To primitive people, their local area...WAS THE WHOLE WORLD. To them. And, China aside, there are multiple historic references to "world ending" floods all around the globe, like the story of Gilgamesh and in Norse, and even Native and South American oral histories. It's actually, really fascinating. How all these disparate cultures around the world, with NO CONTACT with each other, all have similar Flood myths around the same time.
Because floods happen all the time and as you said they have no concept of what's regional and what's global. Nothing is fascinating about this whatsoever.
It doesn't actually say that in the Bible. Just says God told Noah to build the ark and fill it with animals and Noah did and then the flood came and wiped out everyone else. There's certainly a lore surrounding it that involves Noah desperately trying to save his neighbors and being laughed at, but that's the stuff of children's stories and sermons trying to make the story less horrific by assuming there must have been some attempt at salvation and trying to make the drowning victims more responsible for their own demise. These kinds of ameliorations are pretty common when you're growing up Evangelical and are compelled to believe the Bible is literally true but also God is all powerful and all loving.
they drew the line at finding out it would only be two. or six, depending on which version of Genesis you are using. But they really didn’t like that after landing they would burn the spares.
Scene would have been more accurate if the 'locals' were burning the little ones. It wasn't a random cull 😂 Still funny, but they missed the chance for some good dialogue. 'I thought your side encouraged sacrifice?' 'Yes but not human sacrifice!' 'What's the difference?' 'The difference...?' 'Yeah, I mean, It's all flesh. Meat, blood, what's the difference?' 'The difference is humanity have souls, in all of creation, they are special.' 'Yeah, that's why I told them humans would make better sacrifices.'
Once again, a member of the death cult is here to justify the idea of their god murdering everybody on Earth, including babies, pregnant women, etc., because they think every human did something to deserve it. And without mentioning the times his religion demanded human sacrifice. Or how often his religion demands human sacrifice to this day. Christianity is a warped and immoral religion.
There is no evidence, Biblical or otherwise, of pre-flood civilizations burning babies. The only explicit sin mentioned was humans sleeping with "sons of God" which could be a reference to demons or angels or lesser gods considering back then everyone was polytheistic. You're thinking of Molech who was a deity mentioned later and often used to justify the Canaanite conquest, even though the data on that is also very sketchy (i.e. I've never managed to find anyone making claims about baby burning who wasn't trying to justify some Biblical God-commanded atrocity). And even if there was child sacrifice going on, that doesn't exactly justify God killing all of the children, particularly when drowning is apparently one of the most painful ways to die.
What’s your theory? Peoples had several flood events (like recently) and they turned them into myth or there was one very big flood very long ago, e.g. the ice of ice age melted or something like that?
@@gedludek8245 It's been pretty common throughout history for people to settle near large bodies of water so they had access to water. So the idea that a big flood happened at some point in the past and it killed a lot of people is going to be spread around a bit. Thing is, the flood myths are different and mutually exclusive, occurring at different times throughout history. It's impossible for it to have been one single event. Plus, you have to remember fish exist. If you've ever kept them, they can be really touchy about salinity, pH, and temperature. Some fish can't exist except at certain water pressure. Now imagine if there was a global flood of fresh rain water that combined all bodies of saltwater and freshwater into one big massive ocean, changing all of the conditions rapidly.
Obviously, floods are a major calamity throughout history and have killed a lot. Coastal areas especially are where you can trace their origin. That is why dates never match up (dating before the Adam and eve as well). Different places suffered natural calamities at different times. There are myths and stories of storms as well, For sea as well, etc. Anything that seemed like a force of nature that could not be explained has such myths.
There were many nations that have a flood story around the same time in history And yes the flood was written in the perspective of the locals so they didn't know if God spared distant nations The flood was certainly wide enough to cover all the earth as God said though it may or may not have covered every piece of land in foreign countries there is even archaeological evidence of creatures and fish in places they shouldn't be that can only be explained by a vast flood
@@phynchen8139 lol setting aside your atheist comment on a fairy tale the archaeological evidence and records of it occurring are enough to prove the flood happened irrelevant of how realistic it is
The Chinese do have their own flood legends. Wikipedia says ; "China (Chinese: 大洪水; pinyin: Dà Hóngshuǐ; also known as Chinese: 洪水; pinyin: Hóngshuǐ) is a deluge theme which happened in China. Derk Bodde (1961) stated that "from all mythological themes in ancient Chinese, the earliest and so far most pervasive is about flood."[1] The mythology also has shared characteristics with other Great Floods all over the world,[2] although it also has unique characteristics or different focuses. Lu Yilu (2002) groups all versions of great flood into three themes: "the heroes controls the flood; "brother-sister marriage to repopulating the world"; and "the flood which is drowning the whole city along with its citizens". Flood legends are found all around the globe. Why is it so hard for some people to accept that humanity has responsibilities, and to see that there are consequences to ones decisions?
Because not everyone is responsible all together for every action, and an omnipotent god punishing everyone for it is just a cruel act. It is like raping your daughter who did nothing, as punishment because you raped mine. She had no control over where she was born, that was an act of God. It is quite dumb to punish everyone. If I were God, I would be insulted someone would say I did all that. And obviously, floods are a major calamity throughout history and have killed a lot. Coastal areas especially are where you can trace their origin. That is why dates never match up (dating before the Adam and eve as well). Different places suffered natural calamities at different times. There are myths and stories of storms as well, For sea as well, etc. Anything that seemed like a force of nature that could not be explained has such myths. Those myths also match up. Hindu mythology has so many stories that are shared by other independent cultures. Human lives revolve around these things so they have stories. Reincarnatoin, afterlife and so many other things of different types match and not match across the world.
Lying by omission : if you follow the link in the page you'll find that that myth is due to the 1920 BCE -Jishi Gorge outburst flood on the Yellow River which caused a huge but localised flood. Why did you not mention that? Lying for God?
Okay there couldn't of been any Australians or Chinese yet back then cause at this point in time God hadn't yet confused all of the languages yet. As the events of Noah's Ark occurred BEFORE the tower of Babel. And yes, all of the people save for Noah's family was the only group not wicked. Think about that, not even their children were worth saving due to how evil man had become. Whats more these same people had the Ark right there in front of them! Noah no doubt must have warned them, told them about what was coming. Why he was building that Ark. Also, no where is it mentioned in God's word that Noah refused anyone entry before that big door was shut. People could had gotten on that ship at any time before the Flood waters came, but they didn't. Just some food for thought, regardless of your standing religion wise.
It's a joke about literalist interpretation of the Old Testament. Bishop Ussher calculated that, based on the Bible's chronology, the earth was created in 4004 BC and that the flood occurred in 2350 BC, which was later accepted as the "traditional" biblical date. The trouble is, Chinese history has records of that period, which completely fail to mention being wiped out by cataclysmic floods.
Just food for thought. Well, it is only religious nutters that eat plates full of religious sh..ahem..manure like this, then say YUMMY, YUMMY, more please.
Some food for thought, regardless of which fairy tales you believe in : fire pits in Australia are reliably dated to 38,000 BCE. How reliably? As reliably as nuclear fission, as reliable as x-rays, as reliable as a radiotherapy machine cooking flesh, as reliable as gamma ray sterilisation of scalpels.
Well, when an author makes fun of a religion, they tend to go with the one they were brought up in or surrounded by. So for Neil and Terry that would be Christianity. You know this is based on a book right?
This show doesn't "criticize" anything. It does, however, satirize. There is a difference. If you feel yourself indicted by it, that says more about you than the series.
So I have been reading a few comments here. Gonna throw you people a bone ; At least read a Bible before accusing our creator of being petty. That said, " the bone " in the shortest summary I can muster .... YEHOVAH lost us millennia ago. Humanity is the original 1/3 that fell ( stopped following the ancient path ), and since departing from perfection means imperfection, and since YEHOVAH can not exist within any imperfect being without being lethal to said being, he had to leave lest we die from the experience. So, YEHOVAH " prepared the Earth " which was previously made ( narrative doesn't actually say how long it took to make the universe) Only says how much time it took to prepare the Earth for mankind ( 6000 years ) Man is being tested to see who is willing to do right. Anyone willing will be saved. Simple.
This show really makes the Lord almighty look like he's the bad guy. We are the ones that sinned and have disobeyed him over and over again, we are the ones that are in the wrong, we deserve this. I'm not perfect but I pray everyone will come to Christ and ask for forgiveness and you will be saved! God bless you all.
lol? Screw this. An all knowing, all powerful, deity with perfect foresight made everything. Imagine you create a buncha robots... build them with flaws... then being made they can't counter the flaws you knew they would have before they were created. Flaws you literally created... then send them to eternal hell for.
@shadopard7527 Each individual has been gifted free will. God never forces us to do anything, but he will guide us if we let him. Our actions have consequences just as if you were to disobey your parents, there are consequences, no? Just the same as God, he punishes us for our actions and those actions send us to hell not God we send ourselves to hell but through the blood of Jesus Christ we are saved if we receive him as our Lord and savior.
@@braeden99lmfao. I'm Autistic. Do you know how that sounds? Sounds like you suffer more than me. Here are facts as presented by xtianity. Note, I'm a myths/religions major. Xtianity says god is omnipotent and omniscient, as well as having a plan that determines what destiny is... which, again, was set in stone before time started. Anything good happens? God's plan. Means anything bad that does also must be. It is a planned fate determined by an omnipotent omniscient being before existence becomes. Before "let there be light." He knows all, sees all, and has known everything that will ever happen the moment it came into being because it willed that that be so. It is also omnipotent. Has the power to do ANYTHING. Literally all powerful. So from these we know god creates with intent and foresight. It can make existence exactly how it wants, so its plan is never wrong. So god made us in ways god knew we would fail. Again, think of a robot that you make then tell it to complete certain tasks while not doing others. You follow your plan. You create an environment for it. You program it. You choose the materials it is made of. You give it "free will to choose" in its coding. But that free will is an illusion because you created a robot, an environment, and started a sequence of events you knew and planned would end 1 way and 1 way only. A "malfunctioning" robot. Being omniscient and omnipotent... you would know every time a material would fail. Being the one to make the environment, and sequence of events to come... you choose at the start whether it will fail or not. Every time you made "bad coding"... like humans sinning. Therefore, if your robot fails, even though it "chose"... you set it up so it was destined to fail. God gave us bad code, knowing we would make faulty choices. It is literally his plan for Lucifer to question and fall... for Lilith to refuse to kowtow to Adam. Like the song says, if god made bunnies, kittens, love, etc.. he also decreed snakes, poison, pain, and every form of evil. Hence, if all powerful and all knowing... how can it be all good when it created so much evil? If there is a planned destiny... free will is an illusion. Like the rick n morty episode where we see the miniverse rick created to power his car. He creates a universe so people will generate power. He "let's" them have history, society, choices, etc... they just have to spend time on the machines he created that gives them electricity if they walk on them. Someone replies, "Sounds like slavery with extra steps." And it is. When a genius in the miniverse makes a microverse after having the same idea, the illusion is shattered. Rick no longer gets power for his car. No longer has use for the miniverse. So... no. We don't "fail". We perform exactly as planned, foreseen, and built. If there is an omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, god with a plan and destiny.
actually they just seemed like an odd couple of fellas. that's what made it cool. just my opinion. the next comment is funnily the exact oppsite@@qlipothian
"Not the kids, you can't kill kids" - Crowley.
Even demons have standards lol
makes you wonder whos really the bad guy in this story lol, the fallen angels that rebelled against god to help man, or god for all the extinction level events he calls "salvation".
No Crowley has standards.
@@Skyte100 "commas!" ( 😉 )
He was probably talking about the goats
Goats walk by and Crowly says: "Not the kids, you can't kill kids". Even the demons are animal lovers in this show.
I don't think he meant kids as young goats but kids as in children. They were running by at the same time.
@@maxwill6408Congratulations, between the two of you the joke was managed to be gotten.
they sold/ate kids in this generation. plus only noah and his family were fully human. everyone else mixed their genes with the offspring of the nephilim and were all equally lawless, barbaric and insatiable.
Oh that joke went over my head.
@@maxwill6408You’re quite slow (mentally).
I love that he said that the rainbow is a promise is a promise not to drown everyone again. Best line
I don't get it. Is it a pride thing,
No, it was an allusion to the actual scripture where the first rainbow was used to symbolize gods covenant to the survivors that he would never send another flood like Noah’s again.
@jbadger30 allusion. And it was the sign of a pact between God and man. That god would not flood again. I candidly forgot what humanities part was.
The really messed up part was the flood predates the 10 commandments so these people really had no way to know they tempted fate this hard.
It’s more like a warning for every time it stops raining. Like god warning you, your lucky you haven’t pissed me off, I could have just flooded everything and drowned you, but I didn’t!
@@parinikasharma317u not red the bibble?
Hey Noah!! one of the Unicorn’s getting away!! Oh never mind.
Unicorn 1 " Bob! you made it"
Unicorn 2 "Sure did Steve......"
Both "Fuck!"
@@1978sjtO SHI
"not the kids, you can't kill kids"
Uhhh, he's gonna be disappointed in the future.....
cause no kids had ever been killed up to to point? Like wtf ar you talking about? Do you even think about what you type?
@@drg8687 I was referring to "heaven" killing children in the Bible.
Also, stop attempting to pick fights on UA-cam, we have Reddit for that!😁
The 10th plague of Egypt which kills the first born.
are*@@drg8687
@@drg8687 its a joke pussy not a dick, you dont have to take it so hard
"How Kind". That had me spiting up my coffee.
Yeah God's a real dick in this show... and the Bible...
OMG that's hilarious, the Chinese reference! Must have been reading Prof. Birn: “For many the most disturbing immediate problem posed by the discovery of China was its impact on the historical veracity of the Bible. According to the calculations of the Jesuit scholar Martini, the Celestial Empire had been founded 660 years before the accepted date of the biblical deluge. However, Chinese annals contained no reference to the Flood. Could it therefore have been merely a local episode, important only to Jews and their immediate neighbors? Some scholars estimated that East Asian civilizations were flourishing even before the accepted date of Adam’s Fall. Was it possible then that Adam was the ancestor of the Jews alone, and not of humanity at large? China past and present either was calling to question the universal character of Christianity, or else it was placing doubt on the accuracy of biblical chronology.” - Raymond Birn, Crisis, Absolutism, Revolution: Europe 1648 to 1789 (2nd Ed., 1992), p. 169.
Fascinating reference.
I'm an atheist.
As an ethnic Chinese we have our own version of flood mythology.
Or could it simply be that we humans cannot understand the ways of the Almighty God. "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:8-9 ESV
@@Grumpy-Curmudgeon Oh please. I know it's Sunday and all that, but the God that humans understand was created by humans in the human image of our parents. As Darrow said, the only honest answer is "We don't know."
@@Grumpy-Curmudgeon& yet there’s a bunch of white Christian nationalists in the US who insist that they understand God’s intentions.
I love how the DEMON draws the line at killing kids
Goats are a huge part of their religious practices.
yea, makes you wonder about some axioms that were followed all that time...
I think this the ultimate hair style for Crowley. God, he looks super gorgeous with the long red hair. What a beautiful creature.
For my money I love his Roman Caesar look. The little red curls combed forward and the silver tiara...scrummy.
"Just the locals" can be interpreted as Aziraphale being clueless... but also for the event to be REALLY just a local phenomenon.
The angel mentions cultures that lived through the time of the supposed global flood, after all
...only the Sunday school educated would interpret that as Aziraphale being clueless. It's obviously a local phenomenon.
except it wasnt a local phenomena and it was global.
i dont believe in god but the global flood definitely happened and is referenced all over the world.
@@kp-legacy-5477except there is zero evidence for a global flood. Even the flood myths aren't universal - unsurprisingly, they are exclusive of cultures linked to coastlines and large river systems, where flood happens
@@kp-legacy-5477there is no concrete proof of it, and even the supposed references all over the world don't support it. Flood myths are virtually exclusive of cultures linked to coastlines and large river systems... unsurprisingly, as these are places where floods happen
Literally not enough water on the planet to do that even if all the ice melted.@@kp-legacy-5477
I love how Aziraphale has this face you have when you try to consciously NOT THINK AT ALL. Because he knows if he does let himself think, he'll fall instantly due to being completely outraged at God's plan.
Exactly! I love that tiny detail of Sheen's acting here.
"Ineffible Plan!"
The way he delivers the “rainbow” line with absolute hopelessness is perfect.
Hes not annoyed at Australia...... yet
God apparently decided to punish Australia by giving them spiders, huge bugs, and other crazy wildlife. 😅
@johnwalker1058 what did the creatures do to be punished with Australians?
Something worse, the British Empire.@@johnwalker1058
He? God is female in this show.
@@starcrysis23 because thats the edgy thing to do
They should have shown this in my Catholic grade school catechism class.
Should’ve shown the “The Life of Brian”
@@averycheesypotato - Better still.
How kind ! lol delivered that beautifully.
I am a dyslexic agnostic and have spent most of my life wondering where my dog is....
You forgot insomniac. Insomniac dyslexic agnostic stays up all night wondering if there is a dog.
Probably found someone better to look after him. Seeming as to how you were defective.
I’m a frisbeeterian. We believe that, when you die, your soul goes up on the roof and you can’t get it down.
That joke and all variants of it are older than you are.
@@AlbertaGeek Old jokes are fine, overused jokes are not.
You know "god" might be morally questionable when even a demon says "Not the kids, you can't kill kids."
Yet American conservatives would ban books dealing with teen suicide but not the Bible when God killed everyone with the flood or ask Job to kill his children.
The god described in the old testament also commanded multiple genocides (in addition to the flood) and openly encouraged rape and slavery. It is a moral monster and definitely not worthy of praise.
Its just to prove hes the g.o.d. He can do as very much as he please. You can go robin william yourself if you dont agree with that. Or would you like to fight him?
And dont worry those kids are well taken care of. None of them going to hell.
In any religion, the Gods have always had a rather cruel nature, even if they were described as “all-loving.” The reason for this is that any God, like any religion, is a creation of the human mind, human imagination, and people, by nature, are not alien to cruelty, to one degree or another. In addition, the priests of any religion always needed to keep other people within the framework of certain rules and prohibitions, and to support these prohibitions, especially when it came to ancient, dark and superstitious humanity, the easiest way was with stories like this - about the wrath of the gods, about punishments, which may fall on the heads of heretics and unbelievers.
For this reason, I personally more like, in terms of mythology and approach, by various ancient pagan beliefs, such as, for example, the German-Scandinavian pantheon of gods, or the ancient Greek one, where the gods, at least, were more “humane”, with their own vices and problems, and were not “hidden” under the guise of “all-loving and all-knowing beings” by those who preach religion
@@Valseil Kind of hard to fight an imaginary creation of the human mind.
It took me three times to notice the pun.
I love every time Crowley mentions "kids" there are always both human children and infant goats in the next scene. You think he means the children, but he's probably actually worried about the goats!
I mean, Baphomet....
its bad when the demon/fallen angel is the moral one (still the case)
Throughout the entire bible, the devil only kills less than a dozen people (and some of those were on god's order). God commits genocide repeatedly, either himself, or he tells his chosen people to do it. Divine morals, sure :P
Natives had a flood. Only, instead of taking place in the middle of their mythology, it’s at the beginning. Summary: Lots of humans at war, big flood wipes it away, leaving only a rabbit (Nanabozho) and some animals, the rabbit swims down to rescue the animals and then swims the furthest down to reach some earth, which is placed on a turtle back to carry their new home. That’s the creation story of the Ojibwe
I could be wrong, but I think it was actually an otter, not a rabbit
@@thatguy3968
Native American mythos tend to swap animals in the stories depending whise tribe is telling.
For example, look at the origin myth of dead and whose animal is responsible for it.
Cherry-picking at it's finest. The Flood story that preceeded the Noah story was just that - a flood. And the patriach saved his farm and family by putting the family and his livestock on a raft.
You do realize that there were as many creation and destruction stories as there were tribes, right? There is no single "flood story". Not all had a flood story at all.
@@LittleBitofHopeToo2518 My comment stated that is was the Ojibwe creation story, I never mentioned the other tribes
What was it he said to get everyone so upset with him?
Be kind to each other.
Oh yeah that’ll do it.
Possibly my favorite exchange in the whole series.
Yup. And then the line about how he showed him all the kingdoms. "Why?" "He's a carpenter from Galielee, his travel opportunities are limited." That line coming from Tennant is such meta irony or the like, Im wondering if that was written before he was cast.
thanks for this
God being upset with the Eskimos, the Chinese, the Australians and the Patagonians for ¿¿reasons?? was something that always bothered me as a child.
Crawley's horrified reaction to the Allmighty plans of biblical extermination is hilarious. Just the locals, mind you. "Surely not the kids?? You can't kill kids!"
And pregnant women. That's a special kind of sick.
A relatively modern sentiment tbh. Children would grow up to be revenge-seeking adults, so eliminating them was considered for millennia to be pro-actively curtailing a future problem.
@@danieldickson8591 Not sure about that. Don't think the Buddhists would have seen child killing as a necessary evil from time to time. And the Chinese would have needed children to be alive and grow up to defend their empire against the Mongols. Flooding the whole world was a dick move of God's. Humans couldn't destroy God so self-defence couldn't be used as an excuse. And if God was smart and moral, teaching us humans would have been the Creator's job. The Bible is just Jews behaving very badly and claiming, falsely it was God's Will and Plan. Nope.
@@danieldickson8591 Lol, modern Christianity. "Its a modern idea to not want to murder children" HOLY CRAP YOU NEED TO BE ALL IMPRISONED, JESUS.
@@danieldickson8591 FYI you're not Christian and its not a modern thing, you're just a lunatic and anti humanity.
the old testament is a horror story and "god" is the monster.
All religions are horror stories and the Gods are ALWAYS the monsters.
Why do think we were worshiping him? We're not pissing that guy off.
Every religion is a horror story, and the gods are ALWAYS the monsters. OR the ones responsible for the monsters' existence.
Maybe someone got the characters switched up with the devil and God?
@@DeathMessenger1988 that’s partially why I ain’t following any of them.
Aziraphale being taken aback is hilarious. A demon disgusted by what someone who thinks they are saving the world would do. Heroes really are the worst villains.
I don't think for a moment Aziraphale thinks he's saving the world or, deep down, approves of the drowning plan. If you look at the subtle details of his acting here, especially his tiny hesitation when he says "As a promise not to--drown everyone again" I think it's clear he's deeply uncomfortable with this but won't or can't admit it to himself.
I love Crowley's smile.
😂😂 Crowley hello to Aziraphale. Ooo I love it. The eyes of a demon on an angel
I don't love this show, I don't know what it is, but episode 3 where its just the two characters meeting up throughout history was brilliant. A lot of really funny stuff like David's delivery at the end, "How kind..."
The show is called Good Omens and it's SO good! I would highly recommend it.
Really good show.
Oooh the Unicorns. The kids and all the old testament have a lot of kids death.
He looks amazing with hair that length 🥰
"Yet" 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I love her so much.
God?
Funny enough last night I watched the 2014 film Noah and the next found this.
That movie was a banger
God : ESPECIALLY THE KIDS !
"How kind" lmao
Aah. So much love coming from this christian god. So much, people are gonna drown in it, literally drown in god's love. Even the kids. In agony. But don't worry, it's love. He loves them, that much.
This isn't the Christian god, at least not for another four thousand (give or take a few) years.
If life really is just a tiny little thing then one could understand how little it means to a higher being. But then same higher being decides your eternal punishment/reward based on said life so... something is definitely off. Reincarnation sounds so much more logical.
That which sounds by far the most logical is still too scary for you, then?
@@martialme84You mean just death being the end? I don't think that actually sounds most logical. Anything else we look at in the universe seems to exist in a cycle of changing states, the old being reused in a new form until it also becomes old and changes.
(It does sound more logical than getting another go round as a human with deep memories, or a home in the sky for all the good behaving mind/souls.)
@@willchurch8376 There is literally not one piece of evidence for a person's life not just being over.
Your "cycles of changing states" is just "the carbon that was part of a living thing, is now burning merrily in a lil fire".
You're just afraid and you're making up stories to feel better about it.
@@willchurch8376In a sense we are a ‘reincarnation’ of all the living things who’s matter we used to make up our body. I doubt our brains contain much matter that was once part of another human’s brain tissue though.
"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked, for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. " Gal. 6:7
The Old Testament is fucking insane when you think about it for more than five seconds. But that’s not very surprising, people didn’t have the same consistency and storytelling standards than we do now *MANY MILLENIA AGO*
this is so good... =P hehehehe...
I find the slight contrivance funny, that they'll call them "the Native Americans".
At this point, they're just "the Americans" I figure.
Religious satire at its finest.
TBH, this is legit one of the major flaws with looking at the bible the way you might look at any other authored book. It's a collection of stories, written by many we don't know, adaptations of stories that were popular at the time and translated from another language(s). This is why the tone, is inconsistent between the old and new testament and many of the stories imo. Hell the whole "great flood" story was practically ripped from the epic of Gilgamesh.
Big G is definitely annoyed with Australians, that is the only explanation plausible why Luci pets are running around there
What are Luci pets?
Which kid the gaot or the actual child?
yes!
I trust this Crowley fellow with my life more than I trust God with it. That's sad, isn't it?
Perhaps you should find a better god?
@@letolethe3344 Perhaps dealing in reality is the better choice.
Which episode is this?
S1e3.
Satan is not really evil he was made to be perfect the best of them all so he rebelled cause he thought God was wrong he was right. so God wanted to get rid of him cause he made him better and Perfect is not evil
Wait a sec, why is Aziraphale calling them the Native Americans? There's not dispute on their origins at this point in time, at this point in time, they're the Americans.
I mean yes the connotations of that by example are terrible, but, it's accurate, isn't it?
Maybe because there is some evidence that the Chinese were there first.
when people say god is nice and all good and im just like sorry he probubly the worst god when it comes who who is better to his people nothing agent religion just find it strange they say thats nice to wipe out people
The Australians wouldn’t have existed then.
You might want to look into when Australia formed. Hint, it was before the flood
@@AllanTidgwell I said Australians not the actual country.
@@Ally.Cat.252fire pits dated back to 38,000 BCE
@@Ally.Cat.252 The land that we call Australia now has had people living on it for tens of thousands of years. Somewhere between 40-50 thousand.
If you're complaining because they use the word 'Australia' just pretend it's updated through a time filter because they didn't have America then either, or China by that name and they weren't speaking English.
Funny and insightful into the ridiculousness of cult mythology.
Havent seen this yet, but per the bible, the people from this time were just the WORST
And that includes the children, the babies, all of them?
Let's contrast that with god's _chosen people_ in Judges 21 shall we?
"Per the bible..." Yeah? Which part of the bible? You do realize it contains hundred of separate books written over millennia by hundreds of different people, right? And that it isn't historical reporting? You might as well say, "Per Grimm's Fairy Tales..."
My favorite is the “Native” Americans. Why reference them that way during this point of history? (Assuming this isn’t being presented as a translation like in Lord of the Rings.)
Probably they knew the future and knew they'd be referred to that way.
To primitive people, their local area...WAS THE WHOLE WORLD. To them.
And, China aside, there are multiple historic references to "world ending" floods all around the globe, like the story of Gilgamesh and in Norse, and even Native and South American oral histories. It's actually, really fascinating. How all these disparate cultures around the world, with NO CONTACT with each other, all have similar Flood myths around the same time.
Because flooding is a surprising frequent natural phenomena!
Lol, when they gotta reach the fanatics will REEEEACH.
"Floods didn't exist until Christians invented them!" lol.
Most cultures have flood myths because most cultures live near large river systems... where floods happen
Because floods happen all the time and as you said they have no concept of what's regional and what's global. Nothing is fascinating about this whatsoever.
To be honest, this clip does forget one thing: Noah did actually try to get other people on the Ark but they openly refused.
It doesn't actually say that in the Bible. Just says God told Noah to build the ark and fill it with animals and Noah did and then the flood came and wiped out everyone else. There's certainly a lore surrounding it that involves Noah desperately trying to save his neighbors and being laughed at, but that's the stuff of children's stories and sermons trying to make the story less horrific by assuming there must have been some attempt at salvation and trying to make the drowning victims more responsible for their own demise. These kinds of ameliorations are pretty common when you're growing up Evangelical and are compelled to believe the Bible is literally true but also God is all powerful and all loving.
That might have happened in extra-biblical sources (like the Talmud) but not in the canonical Hebrew bible.
And how many would fit exactly?
they drew the line at finding out it would only be two.
or six, depending on which version of Genesis you are using. But they really didn’t like that after landing they would burn the spares.
Having the demons played as snarky gays seems accurate.
Scene would have been more accurate if the 'locals' were burning the little ones.
It wasn't a random cull 😂
Still funny, but they missed the chance for some good dialogue.
'I thought your side encouraged sacrifice?'
'Yes but not human sacrifice!'
'What's the difference?'
'The difference...?'
'Yeah, I mean, It's all flesh. Meat, blood, what's the difference?'
'The difference is humanity have souls, in all of creation, they are special.'
'Yeah, that's why I told them humans would make better sacrifices.'
And who would have THAT dialouge? I can't picture either one of them saying anything of that.....
@NordRheinWestfale Close your eyes then. It might help.
@@leej.a.7810 The logic is to drown all the children so they can't be sacrificed then?
Once again, a member of the death cult is here to justify the idea of their god murdering everybody on Earth, including babies, pregnant women, etc., because they think every human did something to deserve it. And without mentioning the times his religion demanded human sacrifice. Or how often his religion demands human sacrifice to this day. Christianity is a warped and immoral religion.
There is no evidence, Biblical or otherwise, of pre-flood civilizations burning babies. The only explicit sin mentioned was humans sleeping with "sons of God" which could be a reference to demons or angels or lesser gods considering back then everyone was polytheistic. You're thinking of Molech who was a deity mentioned later and often used to justify the Canaanite conquest, even though the data on that is also very sketchy (i.e. I've never managed to find anyone making claims about baby burning who wasn't trying to justify some Biblical God-commanded atrocity). And even if there was child sacrifice going on, that doesn't exactly justify God killing all of the children, particularly when drowning is apparently one of the most painful ways to die.
Everyone has a flood myth, sometimes dates don't align because when going so far back it's just guesswork.
What’s your theory? Peoples had several flood events (like recently) and they turned them into myth or there was one very big flood very long ago, e.g. the ice of ice age melted or something like that?
@@gedludek8245 It's been pretty common throughout history for people to settle near large bodies of water so they had access to water. So the idea that a big flood happened at some point in the past and it killed a lot of people is going to be spread around a bit. Thing is, the flood myths are different and mutually exclusive, occurring at different times throughout history. It's impossible for it to have been one single event.
Plus, you have to remember fish exist. If you've ever kept them, they can be really touchy about salinity, pH, and temperature. Some fish can't exist except at certain water pressure. Now imagine if there was a global flood of fresh rain water that combined all bodies of saltwater and freshwater into one big massive ocean, changing all of the conditions rapidly.
No, they don't and even if they did it doesn't mean anything.
Not the japanese though, they just have myths and some arbitrary date, were all the village chronics on this side of the coast ended.
Obviously, floods are a major calamity throughout history and have killed a lot. Coastal areas especially are where you can trace their origin. That is why dates never match up (dating before the Adam and eve as well). Different places suffered natural calamities at different times.
There are myths and stories of storms as well, For sea as well, etc. Anything that seemed like a force of nature that could not be explained has such myths.
There were many nations that have a flood story around the same time in history And yes the flood was written in the perspective of the locals so they didn't know if God spared distant nations The flood was certainly wide enough to cover all the earth as God said though it may or may not have covered every piece of land in foreign countries there is even archaeological evidence of creatures and fish in places they shouldn't be that can only be explained by a vast flood
Since God invented punctuation, what does it say about you that you don't use it?
@@LittleBitofHopeToo2518 honestly everyone gets lazy with punctuation and grammar when using text online
Yeah, doesn't change that it's just a fairy tale story. Although admittedly, a much less realistic one than most.
@@phynchen8139 lol setting aside your atheist comment on a fairy tale the archaeological evidence and records of it occurring are enough to prove the flood happened irrelevant of how realistic it is
@@fruitfulconnoisseur So you're genuinely saying that there was a global flood like the bible describes, reducing humanity to 6 people?
The Chinese do have their own flood legends. Wikipedia says ; "China (Chinese: 大洪水; pinyin: Dà Hóngshuǐ; also known as Chinese: 洪水; pinyin: Hóngshuǐ) is a deluge theme which happened in China. Derk Bodde (1961) stated that "from all mythological themes in ancient Chinese, the earliest and so far most pervasive is about flood."[1] The mythology also has shared characteristics with other Great Floods all over the world,[2] although it also has unique characteristics or different focuses. Lu Yilu (2002) groups all versions of great flood into three themes: "the heroes controls the flood; "brother-sister marriage to repopulating the world"; and "the flood which is drowning the whole city along with its citizens".
Flood legends are found all around the globe. Why is it so hard for some people to accept that humanity has responsibilities, and to see that there are consequences to ones decisions?
Because not everyone is responsible all together for every action, and an omnipotent god punishing everyone for it is just a cruel act. It is like raping your daughter who did nothing, as punishment because you raped mine. She had no control over where she was born, that was an act of God. It is quite dumb to punish everyone.
If I were God, I would be insulted someone would say I did all that.
And obviously, floods are a major calamity throughout history and have killed a lot. Coastal areas especially are where you can trace their origin. That is why dates never match up (dating before the Adam and eve as well). Different places suffered natural calamities at different times.
There are myths and stories of storms as well, For sea as well, etc. Anything that seemed like a force of nature that could not be explained has such myths. Those myths also match up.
Hindu mythology has so many stories that are shared by other independent cultures. Human lives revolve around these things so they have stories.
Reincarnatoin, afterlife and so many other things of different types match and not match across the world.
Lying by omission : if you follow the link in the page you'll find that that myth is due to the 1920 BCE -Jishi Gorge outburst flood on the Yellow River which caused a huge but localised flood. Why did you not mention that? Lying for God?
Okay there couldn't of been any Australians or Chinese yet back then cause at this point in time God hadn't yet confused all of the languages yet. As the events of Noah's Ark occurred BEFORE the tower of Babel.
And yes, all of the people save for Noah's family was the only group not wicked. Think about that, not even their children were worth saving due to how evil man had become.
Whats more these same people had the Ark right there in front of them! Noah no doubt must have warned them, told them about what was coming. Why he was building that Ark. Also, no where is it mentioned in God's word that Noah refused anyone entry before that big door was shut. People could had gotten on that ship at any time before the Flood waters came, but they didn't.
Just some food for thought, regardless of your standing religion wise.
It's a joke about literalist interpretation of the Old Testament. Bishop Ussher calculated that, based on the Bible's chronology, the earth was created in 4004 BC and that the flood occurred in 2350 BC, which was later accepted as the "traditional" biblical date. The trouble is, Chinese history has records of that period, which completely fail to mention being wiped out by cataclysmic floods.
Just food for thought.
Well, it is only religious nutters that eat plates full of religious sh..ahem..manure like this, then say YUMMY, YUMMY, more please.
Some food for thought, regardless of which fairy tales you believe in : fire pits in Australia are reliably dated to 38,000 BCE. How reliably? As reliably as nuclear fission, as reliable as x-rays, as reliable as a radiotherapy machine cooking flesh, as reliable as gamma ray sterilisation of scalpels.
Would have produced a show that criticizes the moral lapses of the Muslim faith, instead of the Christian faith?
No?
I wonder why.
I mean what's stopping you?
Well, when an author makes fun of a religion, they tend to go with the one they were brought up in or surrounded by. So for Neil and Terry that would be Christianity. You know this is based on a book right?
Err… the flood story is also part of Islamic faith too, so they are actually “criticizing” Islam too.
This show doesn't "criticize" anything. It does, however, satirize. There is a difference. If you feel yourself indicted by it, that says more about you than the series.
We get it; you're a bigot. Please go away now.
"Just the locals"
meanwhile most ancient peoples have a great flood story in their mythology...
The Chinese one is from 1920 BCE - the Jishi Gorge outburst flood on the Yellow River
All you anti-christians out there read the KJV Bible to find out what horse sheeeet this scene is.
Well we know that it's fiction. After all, the world wasn't actually created about 6000 years ago. It's all fiction.
You mean this show isn't a documentary????!!!! You astonish me.
So I have been reading a few comments here. Gonna throw you people a bone ; At least read a Bible before accusing our creator of being petty. That said, " the bone " in the shortest summary I can muster .... YEHOVAH lost us millennia ago. Humanity is the original 1/3 that fell ( stopped following the ancient path ), and since departing from perfection means imperfection, and since YEHOVAH can not exist within any imperfect being without being lethal to said being, he had to leave lest we die from the experience. So, YEHOVAH
" prepared the Earth " which was previously made ( narrative doesn't actually say how long it took to make the universe) Only says how much time it took to prepare the Earth for mankind ( 6000 years ) Man is being tested to see who is willing to do right. Anyone willing will be saved. Simple.
Read the bible - Exodus 21, and Judges 21 ; it's a book justifying the privilege of a few and discarding everyone else.
Are you suffering under the delusion that people are going to read the nonsensical screed of a YT rando trying and failing to lecture about religion?
This show really makes the Lord almighty look like he's the bad guy. We are the ones that sinned and have disobeyed him over and over again, we are the ones that are in the wrong, we deserve this. I'm not perfect but I pray everyone will come to Christ and ask for forgiveness and you will be saved! God bless you all.
lol? Screw this. An all knowing, all powerful, deity with perfect foresight made everything. Imagine you create a buncha robots... build them with flaws... then being made they can't counter the flaws you knew they would have before they were created. Flaws you literally created... then send them to eternal hell for.
@shadopard7527 Each individual has been gifted free will. God never forces us to do anything, but he will guide us if we let him. Our actions have consequences just as if you were to disobey your parents, there are consequences, no? Just the same as God, he punishes us for our actions and those actions send us to hell not God we send ourselves to hell but through the blood of Jesus Christ we are saved if we receive him as our Lord and savior.
@@braeden99lmfao. I'm Autistic. Do you know how that sounds? Sounds like you suffer more than me.
Here are facts as presented by xtianity. Note, I'm a myths/religions major. Xtianity says god is omnipotent and omniscient, as well as having a plan that determines what destiny is... which, again, was set in stone before time started. Anything good happens? God's plan. Means anything bad that does also must be. It is a planned fate determined by an omnipotent omniscient being before existence becomes. Before "let there be light."
He knows all, sees all, and has known everything that will ever happen the moment it came into being because it willed that that be so. It is also omnipotent. Has the power to do ANYTHING. Literally all powerful. So from these we know god creates with intent and foresight. It can make existence exactly how it wants, so its plan is never wrong. So god made us in ways god knew we would fail.
Again, think of a robot that you make then tell it to complete certain tasks while not doing others. You follow your plan. You create an environment for it. You program it. You choose the materials it is made of. You give it "free will to choose" in its coding. But that free will is an illusion because you created a robot, an environment, and started a sequence of events you knew and planned would end 1 way and 1 way only. A "malfunctioning" robot.
Being omniscient and omnipotent... you would know every time a material would fail. Being the one to make the environment, and sequence of events to come... you choose at the start whether it will fail or not. Every time you made "bad coding"... like humans sinning. Therefore, if your robot fails, even though it "chose"... you set it up so it was destined to fail.
God gave us bad code, knowing we would make faulty choices. It is literally his plan for Lucifer to question and fall... for Lilith to refuse to kowtow to Adam. Like the song says, if god made bunnies, kittens, love, etc.. he also decreed snakes, poison, pain, and every form of evil. Hence, if all powerful and all knowing... how can it be all good when it created so much evil? If there is a planned destiny... free will is an illusion.
Like the rick n morty episode where we see the miniverse rick created to power his car. He creates a universe so people will generate power. He "let's" them have history, society, choices, etc... they just have to spend time on the machines he created that gives them electricity if they walk on them. Someone replies, "Sounds like slavery with extra steps." And it is. When a genius in the miniverse makes a microverse after having the same idea, the illusion is shattered. Rick no longer gets power for his car. No longer has use for the miniverse.
So... no. We don't "fail". We perform exactly as planned, foreseen, and built. If there is an omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, god with a plan and destiny.
The eternal delusion of man.
Hint its because the Judeah god is a incredibly MASSIVELY EVIL ENTITY that enslave sits worshipers and commands their deaths for his pleasure.
Stupid show
they really ruined this series by making them gay...... it felt tacked on .
There is not a single romantic moment between them. That's just you projecting.
Tacked on ?
They practically act like a married couple in every scene.
I'm so sorry you are so stupid.
actually they just seemed like an odd couple of fellas. that's what made it cool. just my opinion. the next comment is funnily the exact oppsite@@qlipothian
ok@@jamesbrice3267
of course a show made by literal demons would say this lmao.
Found the christian.
Found someone who doesn't know what literal means.
I mean, doesn't the show have a point in questioning an act of genocide?