Lec 1 | MIT 5.60 Thermodynamics & Kinetics, Spring 2008
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 вер 2024
- Lecture 1: State of a system, 0th law, equation of state.
Instructors: Moungi Bawendi, Keith Nelson
View the complete course at: ocw.mit.edu/5-6...
License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
More courses at ocw.mit.edu
This professor today has became a Nobel laureate in chemistry
And a climate change wacko.
@@YesYou-zy7kpyes that's incredible
By the way burh where are u from and I'm which grade are u in?
@@YesYou-zy7kp you surely understand better climate change than a professor of thermodynamics and chemistry nobel prize winner..
@@asdfafafdasfasdfs You mean a Nobel Prize winner AND a leftist stooge? They are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
@@Brahmachari11I'm in 8th
Congratulations Prof. Bawendi! I've been watching your videos here since 2009. I can't believe you're a Nobel Prize Laureate now! 👏
This professor just simplified and made me understand everything my professor is teaching me for the past 2 months of thermo class. His global story in the beginning was actually to help students understand the difference between macro and microscopic properties of thermodynamics. If you follow exactly what he is saying, it should make sense since he actually defines everything-which ALMOST every thermo professor will not do. Count yourselves blessed MIT students. And thank you for sharing!
He just won nobel prize
Thanks MIT for upload all these excellent classes. I'd like to make a donation but I'm just a poor engineering student...
I was just wondering. Is this calculus-based?
German Pedro
there is the heat equation. I actually have no idea how to use such a differential equation.
welcome to the broke club !
@@srpenguinbr read Atkins or puri sharma.... Your concepts will be cleared
I saw his picture as Nobel winner and I quickly recognised that I had listened his lectures on Thermodynamics few years back. Today I came here to reconfirm. Heartiest Congratulations❤
I love how intuitively he explains thermodynamics. this man is an incredibly gifted lecturer
an incredibly gifted lecturer.... will never take a scrap of paper to make a lecture out of it ...Richard Feynman was a gifted lecturer ... moderation is required in your judgement especially if the number of gifted teachers that you have ever seen equals to zero /// his way of providing this lecture by reading from the paper plus his internal state of great anxiety looks like ////well just for polite correctness I won't go any further
@@alexsheremett3097 Did you just reply on 7 years old comment praising the teacher, just to insult him? wow, thats something else
@@RomanUrbanek first I didn't insult read carefully what I wrote second... He insulted himself by reading from a scrap of paper third about the content bad incomprehensible.. You can pick up more by reading Wikipedia.. Four you can't even imagine how far... Like English and Chinese language....I'm from thermodynamics... But I needed urgently to brush up on the topic ... And the lecture was catastrophic... Now five what the hell has to do that s 7 years old by the way I didn't look the date... It was bad. . Best regards over..
@@alexsheremett3097
I'm sure negative review of a teacher from the best engineering school in the world, comming from nobody on youtuve has value.. to someone :)
@@alexsheremett3097 who cares if he's orienting from notes? I didn't even pay attention to that until I read your comment.
5.60
Thermodynamics & Kinetics
Spring 2008
Moungi Bawandi, Keith Nelson
Lecture 1: State of a system, 0th law, equation of state
Lecture 2: Work, heat, first law
Lecture 3: Internal energy, expansion work
Lecture 4: Enthalpy
Lecture 5: Adiabatic changes
Lecture 6: Thermochemistry
Lecture 7: Calorimetry
Lecture 8: Second law
Lecture 9: Entropy and the Clausius inequality
Lecture 10: Entropy and irreversibility
Lecture 11: Fundamental equation, absolute S, third law
Lecture 12: Criteria for spontaneous change
Lecture 13: Gibbs free energy
Lecture 14: Multicomponent systems, chemical potential
Lecture 15: Chemical equilibrium
Lecture 16: Temperature, pressure and Kp
Lecture 17: Equilibrium: application to drug design
Lecture 18: Phase equilibria - one component
Lecture 19: Clausius-Clapeyron equation
Lecture 20: Phase equilibria - two components
Lecture 21: Ideal solutions
Lecture 22: Non-ideal solutions
Lecture 23: Colligative properties
Lecture 24: Introduction to statistical mechanics
Lecture 25: Partition function (q) - large N limit
Lecture 26: Partition function (Q) - many particles
Lecture 27: Statistical mechanics and discrete energy levels
Lecture 28: Model systems
Lecture 29: Applications: chemical and phase equilibria
Lecture 30: Introduction to reaction kinetics
Lecture 31: Complex reactions and mechanisms
Lecture 32: Steady-state and equilibrium approximations
Lecture 33: Chain reactions
Lecture 34: Temperature dependence, Ea, catalysis
Lecture 35: Enzyme catalysis
Lecture 36: Autocatalysis and oscillators
I'm going to watch all of these before my winter course starts. The professor in this video is excellent at explaining the material. Thank you MIT.
im doing the same, how was your experience?
Me too I'm a greek mechanical engineer
Guys, I found these lectures very helpful. Can anyone of you tell me that which book is Sir following?
@@yasirkhan1396 weber is a good one
@@lel3923 I went to Maryland and our course was very fast-paced, literally a problem set due every day. Even though I got an A in the class, I would only recommend a winter class as a last resort. I also didn't make it past the first video lol.
I must say, Its been a long time since I heard and saw a professor that describes a subject so well. Clear spoken, good comparisons and takes his time. Great lecture!!
I respect MIT, their Chemical Engineering Department. All the related open course presentations I've viewed are excellent, efficient to focus on the significant examples, theories, conclusions.
This is soooo good. I can't put in words how much I appreciate these MIT courses. Altough I'm from Germany the course is pretty much the same and the lecturer is soooooo good, mine is so hard to understand that it made physical chemistry look boring, but now I seriously can't stop watching these lectures. This is the greatest thing UA-cam and the MIT offer, for free!
Amela Mesinovic almost all of the lecturers are very charismatic.. it might be a prerequisute to teach there! At our university (also in germany) we have environmental science lecturers that are so boring they actually lose significant parts of their audience after a few weeks in every semester. So yeah very good there are such courses offered online.
You should check out their chemistry course too.! The professor there is outstanding.
Aploading these videos is GREAT not only for students but for general knowledge as well. I actually enjoy watching such videos as i enjoy watching scientific documentaries. I took thermodynamics in college a long time ago and I still come back to it from time to time through these videos. Thank you MIT and I hope to see more universities follow suit.
They just launched a new version of this course (by a different prof) on Edx. Check out: MITx: 5.601x Chemical Thermodynamics I: Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Watch it one time and you keep everything in your mind forever. Thats how good it is!
By breaking even he means energy is conserved in an isolated system. If you have 50 J of potential energy (U), that 50 J's of U can be converted into kinetic energy; problem is some energy will be lost due to friction. The energy that you do lose is forever lost to the universe. Hence, if you can reach absolute zero temperature (0K), you prevent the loss of energy due to friction. This is what he means by the 3rd law (you can never break even). Absolute zero can never be achieved.
There is a lot of blather below regarding whether the lecturer, who is excellent, made a slight mis-statement of this point or that point. All of which is beside the point. What I learned from 5 years of work towards a PhD in physical chemistry is that once through the material is never enough. It takes a combination of live lectures, several textbooks, study guides, writing out mathematical derivations until you understand them, and endless problem solving.
What a great time to be alive. A full course from MIT on thermodynamics; complete and free.
Hi Physics student here, just have to say I've gotten thorough enjoyment over your argument with Mr. Williams. I actually did a paper last semester on alternative fuel/ eliminating use of fossil fuels. I'm always fascinated by peoples' stands on oil and alternative/ renewable energy.
Surprising how much this is helpful to Philosophical topics in one lecture than a whole week or semester of philosophy lectures.
A very brief introduction to PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY. Thermodynamics and Chemical Kinetics are 2 branches of Physical Chemistry.
This is how engineering should be tought. Reading off slides like it's done today is just pointless. I can do that myself.
I love the way he teaches. After teaching for some time he asks whether students have any question or queries in their mind.
This professor is amazing kept me engaged on viewing this and I usually get easily distracted and I loved he put in parts of the history of thermodynamics. I hope he is still making lecture videos and teaching.
They just launched a new version of this course (by a different prof) on Edx. Check out MITx: 5.601x Chemical Thermodynamics I: Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
@@enisten Thqnk you so much I'll definitely check it out :)
In India, coaching institutions are charging thousands to offer such lectures . Thank you, MIT
Congratulations on your Nobel prize in chemistry
Best teacher in my experience so far.
i'm glad that this has subtitles... my native language isn't english but i love to listen to it :) Great explanations but... what a quiet class .-.
That is a college class. You are not supposed to talk
sameee
@@crazychimp1039 biggest lie. I think Barb meant like no one is asking questions.
I love all the videos that MIT offers like this. thank you guys for putting this stuff out there for other people to have the chance to open up their minds to newer, bigger and better ideas.
Nobel laureate in chemistry 2023
so lucky to be taught by a Nobel prize winner
Congrats professor for the Nobel and thank you for your contribution in science.
I loved thermodynamics from these lectures, you made it simple, congratulations prof on your noble prize
Watching these videos is a great way to pass out when you're trying to sleep at night. Not that his lecture is particularly boring, just any lecture is boring.
It's 3 a clock in the morning and i'm watching this. The teatcher explains this subject so good that the time doesn't matter. I had previously experiences with Thermodynamics and it not worked as good as i wanted to be, maybe because the professor didn't make the subject interresting, or maybe because i was unable to understand that in that time.
All of this to say thank you, and express my profound hapiness of learning (reviewing) so many things with this video. Thank you so much :)
The Ocean Conveyer and Evaporation/precipitation cycle are natures example
The Sun heats the Tropical waters, Deep Space super cools the Polar waters, hot water rises,cold water falls the result is the Ocean Conveyer that uses the difference between hot water and cold water to create Kinetic motion(repeat)
As heat from the Ocean rises it created moist thermals, hot air rises, cold air falls and the difference makes wind by kenetics, as heat disapates it makes Clouds that rain(repeat)
this is the best ever thermometer explanation
This instructor teaches in a very easy to understand coherent way. His eyebrows are the focal point of his face.
Just came to say that on the thumbnail the teacher is PERFECTLY camouflaged. Nice.
Such a charismatic lecturer. He makes it 100% easy to UNDERSTAND!
Entropy
Henry Poincare named the conception of "entropy "
as a " surprising abstract "
Lev Landau wrote:
" A question about the physical basis of the
entropy monotonous increasing law remains open "
One physicist said :
" The entropy is only a shadow of energy“
#
History of Entropy
1 - Clausius : dS= dQ / T.
2 - Boltzmann : S= k log W
3 - Planck : h*f = kT logW
#
The formula of Entropy is : h*f = kT logW
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
I wish we had him as our prof.
I was amazed that this was physical chemistry course. And here, we don't have even 10% quality lecture in engineering thermo class..
Summary
Laws of thermodynamics
From i to f both are equilibrium
Infinity of way to move from i to f
P=f(V); isobar isothetmal ...
2 types of system: homologous. Heterogeneous
3 nature of system; open (mass and energy) close (no mass only energy) isolated (no mass no energy )
States described only in i and f despite work W and heat flux Q (W&Q describe way)
Function of interpolation: linear .. quadratic
God bless this channel!
I really like the way he teaches
the universe and with some limits to how large u want your system to be within that universe is technically a isolated system
He means that the 2nd law defines the direction of spontaneous change. A process is spontaneous only if the total entropy of the system in which it occurs increases. For example, sugar dissolving in hot coffee occurs spontaneously -- sugar will only crystallize from hot coffee if energy is expended. i.e. the entropy of the universe must always increase--it follows the direction of natural change, a.k.a. the "arrow of time". The 2nd law is also about the reversibility of change No more room!
@Tanjiskas it means that you convert 100% of the heat you are inducing into the system into useful work. which means that the efficiency is 100%. actually the first never said that but it just didn't mind it. so the second law said that you cannot reach 100% efficiency because you are always generating entropy along the way and by increase in entropy you are wasting energy
I just love this professor. Can I know his name please?
His name is Moungi Bawendi. See the course on MIT OpenCourseWare for more info at: ocw.mit.edu/5-60S08. Best wishes on your studies!
God I miss chalk boards
Congratulations Sir..👍🌹🙏
Thanks for actually teaching and not just being a robot. If only other instructors new how to teach. While filling out my FAFSA, I noticed Wright State only had a 38% graduation rate.
Yes. It's similar to first-semester Physical Chemistry in most universities. Requires 2 semsters of Physics w/ Calc, 2 Semesters of Gen Chem, Single & Multi-Var Calculus, Diff Eqns (ODE), and Organic 1 & 2 is strongly recommended.
Is this usually in the 2nd or 3rd year ?
thanks, greetings from México:)
Summary
Laws of thermodynamics
Studying the way of states from i equilibrium to f equilibrium
Despite work W and heat flux Q
To describe one system just need to know : n nombre of moles and 2 variables
Infinity of the way from i to f
We need to justify if the system is Thermodynamiclly equilibrium or not
Function of form : interpolation linear, quadratic...
Measuring of temperature scales
Equal volume ratio liquids do not imply equal molar ratio. (In case you have not learned, liquids are pretty damn far from ideal gasses; water is denser and has a lower molecular weight than ethanol, equal volume ratio means much higher molar ratio of water to ethanol)
I recommend you reading your high school chemistry notes again.
I know many of you don't care about this, but the translation of the captions is pretty fucking good, at least for spanish. I'm actually impressed about it, a great applause to the google developers.
this video might help too
Thermodynamics 1st Law (Thermal Decomposition)
We have to learn (actually remember) all that stuff in grade 11. Thank you very much for explaining everything in detail.
How was your jee?
How did you do?
pinned neutron superfluid provides an angular momentum reservoir as its rotation rate is determined by the areal vortex density, which is constant as long as it is pinned to the crust. At the same time, the crust continuously slows down due to loss of its angular momentum in the particle wind and electromagnetic radiation. At a critical lag in this differentially rotating two- component system, superfluid vortices get unpinned, dumping a large amount of angular momentum to the crust, which is observed as a spin-up in the crustal rotation rate, usually inferred by timing the radio pulse (Alpar et al. 1984a, 1985). This implies that the fractional spin-up provides a probe of the extent of angular momentum transfer and hence the MoI of the crustal pinned superfluid. The ratio of the MoI of the crustal pinned superfluid to that of the rest of the star, referred to as the fractional moment of inertia (FMI), can be related to the observed fractional spin-up
what a relief..what a real relief..i always feared thermodynamics confused like a shitt..but man this lecture series helps a lot!!!
Heating is the transfer of energy. It is not a substance therefore cannot "flow". If it could flow it would "flow" in any direction, but heat is only transferred from warmer to cooler and cannot be reversed.
12:00
Where there's a thermodynamics.... There's a hot 🔥 coffee ☕😃😃😄😄😄😄
Amazing relationship
What a gifted lecturer. I just realised I misunderstood and overcomplicated thermodynamics in my undergrad.
They just launched a new version of this course (taught by a different prof) on Edx. Check out MITx: 5.601x Chemical Thermodynamics I: Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (course 1 of 2)
How does these full lectures compared to the Edx ones?
The macroscopic view is ruled by conservation and microscopic view was initiation or seeding rain or seeding wind for example
Thermodynamics inside a expanding multiverses. We are inside a blackhole, when event horizon get open, how it's looks than with the thermodynamics in a multiversians model. Thematic, Magnetic Pepeetum Mobile, Blackholebomb Pepeetum Mobile and so on.
35 years ago I heard the same story about “smart” people coming up with ideas to circumvent the “Second Law of Thermodynamics” from my Thermodynamics professor. Apparently things haven’t changed that much since then. I was assuming “progress” of humanity that turned out to be a fallacy.
Life is the result of action of laws of hierarchical thermodynamics.
There technically is no such thing as an isolated system. It's just a useful basic "fudge." I'm sure the genius MIT professor knows this, he's just making things simple for introductory students. Given sufficient time, the contents of even the most robustly insulated container will reach equilibrium with the surroundings.
I wish I had found these before my second semester started
You are in fact misunderstanding. The professor is not saying that there exists a machine that "makes more energy than it creates", but, instead, he is saying that people continually try to build machines that can circumvent the second law of thermodynamics--without succeeding, of course.
Thanks MIT for upload this video
I feel so blessed to see these lectures .This is helping me so much in school .Lots of love from Albania 😁
why is antonio banderas teaching physics?
More like Antonio Banderas mixed with Obama
@@luisbreva6122 attributes? a pathological liar and thief with egomaniac tendencies not to mention a treasonous hart? seems you have your priorities in qualities just a little jostled,, Ann Frank could see and hear better than that, and she had to feel her way through life. it's to bad so many people think with there emotions instead of there brains. they wouldn't be so easily deceived. then we wouldn't have to go around and correct the mistakes they make like so many messy children with unkept rooms. so juvenile and lazy. why people form opinions before becoming informed will always be beyond me.
I love how he starts explaining the thermodynamics of 100-proof vodka with a complete straight face as though it's no different from CO2 or H2SO4
because in order to get absolute zero, you would need to remove all the heat and since heat transfer in a preferred direction from high to low, theoretically you would need something less then absolute zero to remove the heat.
This is a very valuable resource...
oh my god I'm taking 5.60 next semester I'm so glad this is here now I never have to go to lecture
@Polyfusia Yes, I guess I misunderstood you. In that case, I would re-study all of the material on my own time.
In most math classes I would not understand the lectures, and so studied all of the material again in the textbook when I got home.
Look, I'm not saying that it's your fault or whatever, but if you want the education, you find a way to get it. It's not as if having excuses about why you can't do it will help you in any way.
That's a nice cook, as expected from MIT.
His trousers and top are the same colour as the board and wall, and his belt sits just at the right height. If the room were any darker he'd be invisible.
Man, what a badass. (⌐■_■)
Love it when he starts talking about Fahrenheit scale
You might notice that the common word "heat" is used as though we already know what it means. The lecturer does not define it. But if you look up "heat" in Wikipedia you might be surprised, as I was, to find that the definition is not obvious:
"In thermodynamics, heat is energy in transfer [...] by mechanisms other than thermodynamic work or transfer of matter."
Note the word "energy." Reading further in that same Wikipedia article:
"As a form of energy, heat has the unit joule (J) [...] The standard unit for the rate of heat transferred is the watt (W), defined as one joule per second."
So, according to the content of the lecture plus the content of Wikipedia, energy moves from a hot body to a colder body. The rate (per second) of energy transfer can be measured in watts. The total energy transferred can be measured in joules, or (as we know from looking at our electricity bill) maybe even in watt hours.
Heat is energy. I personally do not find that obvious.
These are MIT students.
@@iridiumdx6682 Your point?
@@RalphDratman My point being that this is a lecture for MIT students which happen to be publicised for public use. At least someone taking this should be familiar with the concept of heat as energy. Such trivial thing does not be reinstated in college, let alone at MIT.
Great lecture ! Really enjoy this topic and the way our prof teaches too.It helps me understand more deeply and cleary. ( as a student of École Polytechnique )
They just launched a new version of this course (taught by a different prof) on Edx. Check out MITx: 5.601x Chemical Thermodynamics I: Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (course 1 of 2)
thermo in greek does mean heat but here it is mainly considered as energy since thermodynamics deals with work and heat interactions
42:07 this thing happened to me a lot, so i stopped asking questions in the class. Don't be like me.
i caught that he spends a good deal of time looking down when he's thinking you can tell its habitual. he fails to mention that the American standard has historically changed over time by small increments if he was going to bring up the Dr. in lecture it a small cite to mention that better explains why we see what we do today.
Sir I am still in high school ,can I see these videos?
Time is two way visible and invisible. What we see is forward but the invisible time is reverse but we can not see about what we do goes reverse invisibly
If Antonio Banderas and Obama had a son:
@kayanathera I think he has on that paper the lesson plan NOT the basic concepts!
Because if he hadn't known the basic concepts he wouldn't have been able to explain them so good!
Honestly I think the implications of not doing something about climate change is far more serious. Hurricanes like Katrina and Sandy have already caused billions in damage, and are only set to become more frequent. Add to that the billions in health care from air pollution, the cost of destroyed tourism revenue (reefs, forests, etc), increased drought/flooding, which affects crop yields & cause food prices to increase, the increase in fuel prices, people might be okay with a bit less luxury.
"K" used to be called "degrees Kelvin." With the adoption of SI, they dropped the "degrees" part, so you simply say, or write "K," not "degrees K." But they are still degrees--of the same "size" as C degrees, but starting out at absolute zero.
Thanks for uploading.. that made thermodynamics much better for me...
the guy who raised his hand then put it back down is me lol 42:07
Nerd
this guy can explain better than our teacher.
Fantastic professor and his way of teaching is easy to grasp for a beginner!
Thanksyou MIT, with this I could start preparing for my next semester
If you put an object in a magnetic chamber of 200 tesla, the object will vanish. Once you lower the field it will show up again. However when the object was gone, it has reached absolute zero, therefore the third law of thermodynamics was broken.
thank you, the lecture helps a lot. This course is so stressing.
Why should the thermos can be an isolated system? Energy is leaving it, as the system comes (slowly, it's true) in equilibrium with it's surroundings (outside temperature). I posit it's a closed system, like the water with ice cubes in it.
He finally earned himself the Nobel prize in chemistry🎉
Excellent lecture. I find Thermodynamics an inherently dull, unexciting subject and thus difficult to teach but this is lecturer is SO engaging I'm reallly enjoying it! Surprise surprise...
Can anyone recommend a good book? I'm using F.Mandl's Statistical Physics and it's a chore to read... Bland prose.... little, vague or irrelevant examples for unclear end of chapter problems... If anyone has had any luck with a book on Thermodynamics for 2nd year Physics it would really help!
I was honored to see a lecture by a Nobel laureate