What Scott and Anna were each saying can co exist. The people of Ukraine could've wanted NATO protection at the same time as the US government saw it as an opportunity to overthrow the Ukranian gov't
The ignorant are still making out this conflict started in 2022 when in fact it started in 2014, piers is as uneducated about this conflict as he was about the issue 4 years ago.
@@mfgreviews5028That wasn't an official agreement, it was to USSR not to Russia, and it was on the condition USSR doesn't invade and attack neighboring countries too. Russia invaded and attacked a whole lot of countries in the 90's. But ask Gorbachev who did that deal. Even he says it doesn't apply.
Finally a voice from Ukraine to refute these lame Russian talking points. We need to listen to Ukrainians and more generally East Europeans who have real experience living under the Russian boot, not these so-called Western experts
Turkey haven't advanced their occupation nor annexed land, evicted natives and built illegal settlements or broken international law since they invaded. I condemn the greek orthodox church for letting the banks taking all the citizens money, whilst their churches are adorned with gold and jewels
What about what azeris did to Armenians in their ancestor's lands for the past 4 years with the help of Israel and Turkey? I have never once heard Pierce bring this issue up. The United States government is silent because they’re ignoring the fact that the dictator has been in the position for 23 years. Putin is a dictator, but Aliev is in the same position for as long as Putin is not a dictator.
General Clark nearly brought tears to my eyes. As an American its hard to find strong voices in our country who understands the delicate games being played and knows why democracy and sovereignty is key to peace.
General Clark was amazing. The exchanges showcased the sharpness of his memory and intellect, and together with Ana he carried the weight of subject-matter authority in the room, from two very different but mutually supportive perspectives. But my favorite aspect was seeing the secondary effects his presence had on the dynamic between Ana and Scott. There was a palpable sense of relief when she saw that she wasn't alone in the defense of her home and cause. Clark represents the America I believe in; open to self-reflection and criticism, but committed to standing for its principles. It was weirdly therapeutic watching Scott repeatedly faceplant into an obstacle utterly unmoved by his bullying.
That's a crock. He must have financial ties to Ukraine. He was good when he told us all about the list of 7 countries that Israel wanted us to attack, but he's now compromised.
Just google "Chile -> Allende -> Pinochet" and "Iran -> Mosaddeqh -> Shah Reza Phalavi" and evaluate what role the USA played! After enjoy talking about sovereignity, peace and democracy!
No, it isn't. Instead you let a neocon run the whole show, and very few other people speak. It's not enlightening. It's just flat out. Stupid, but in a different way. But it's still stupid
General Clark with a nice Freudian slip there "Our company, errrr, our country". What are his financial ties to Ukraine and/or companies profiting in Ukraine???
If a nation can’t choose to join an alliance then they aren’t really independent. They only reason Russia won’t allow this (which again they should have no say) is because they want all of Ukraine. They might rest on what they’ve taken for a time but they’ll be back for the rest and they don’t want NATO in the way
@@printinghappinessif America had a recent history of invading and conquering Mexico and Canada, and an agreement guaranteeing their sovereignty and borders, yes.
I have to give Piers credit for bringing together people from mainstream and alternative media to discuss these issues. The show has some problems, but overall I think it is a good platform for these types of discussions.
@@williamgervais9383 Not sure if he brings in the crazy left like steven and fran from yesterday just to show how crazy they are, i find it hard to listen to that kind of lunacy.
I so appreciate this panel tonight. No over talking, no over shouting and diminishment of ideas and information. Active listening and exchange of thought. Civility. Thank you! More of this please.
Yes, I would like to see a one-on-one between Scott and Gen. Clark. Also between Scott and the Ukrainian lady. I could do without Cenk and the I-Killed-Osama guy.
@@drKnow1000 And keep in mind his prominent role as a member of the US military industrial complex. John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs are far more credible on this issue.
Im really amazed that Clark can talk about “the rule of law.” Has he forgotten that the US (NATO) illegally invaded Iraq and killed hundreds of thousands of civilians. They bombed Belgrade to pieces killing innocents. Is that the rule of law he thinks everyone should respect?
JEEZ dude, They should re-do this panel but triple the time. We would ALL be here for it. What an amazing show (I just wish we had more time). PLEASE make this happen Piers. Most of us would LOVE to see this in podcast form! POWERFUL show!
When the general joined the panel then the mood changed as we got to hear somebody aside from the lady from Ukraine who knew what they were talking about
I feel like Piers had a discussion with these guests before the show about respecting other people’s time and being respectful all together. Especially after the episode from the day before… I’ve never seen Cenk sit so quietly. But after the previous episode with Francesca and Destiny, i wondered if it was turning into a Jerry Springer esque show. This was refreshing. If he did, good on Piers for talking with his guests prior to filming about etiquette.
Having the General and Ana actually provide context and real world experience to the discussion was really nice. The podcasting age of “just asking questions” armchair centrism is a scourge to the information landscape. Good luck out there.
Pretty novel insights from the general really brought this conversation full circle in spite of the lopsided main guests on the topic. 3 People bold face telling the woman they will throw her to the wolves at her door as she hefts the axe they are too spineless to carry
All the western news outlets have been ukrainian channels all along. And we have been made to believe that there's a devil and an angel fighting, and that the angel is winning, but the reality is quite different because the truth cannot be buried no matter how you try.
Ukies must be some of the most catastrophically ignorant, poorly informed and gullible people who ever walked the face of the earth. They know nothing about the world beyond the borders of their own bankrupt and corrupt CIA run banana republic.
So true. I watched the one with Destiny and the brunette mouthy chick a couple of days ago - both of which never allow a conservative voice to be heard completely without interrupting them - and I had to fast forward many times because I can't stand listening to that kind of noise.
Sure, but most of the time that's not what this show is and not what it tries to be. It's basically a politcal discourse version of the Jerry Springer Show.
I REALLY enjoyed this panel. A little conflict but not the same screaming over each other which is sometimes fun. General was great and informative and so good to hear that girl speaking as someone on the ground who lost her father. It’s personal. But we are where we are and ALL sides need to be heard. This was one of the best! Bring this panel back on to continue listening and learning from each other.
Escuchar todas las partes? cuáles todas las partes? Este podcast es como la sociedad americana , viven viéndose el ombligo, faltan la gente de donesk falta lo que opinan los rusos
Why would they? Russians/separatists continued to fight (attack) in spite of the armistice. They never intended to apply it (while requiring that Ukrainians do)! Russia never keeps its word.
This is one of the best panels pierce Morgan has had. No one yelling over each other, even though they have wildly different opinions. I actually came away with ideas to think about. Well done
I walked away educated and wanting to listen to more. Also, I agree. This is one of the best panels I have seen in my last few months of watching this YT channel.
@ you should look into Scott Horton, he’s probably the smartest guy on the panel. His books are incredibly well researched. He didn’t have the best showing here but he does good work.
So uplifting to listen to this enlightened and eloquent young woman Anastasiya, a great contrast to the coward from Texas at the other end of the panel. History isn't talked about much and so it might be good to add that the Kyiv Empire flourished long before Moscow even began to transform from a swamp. Cheers from Sweden!
It's a defeatist attitude, but I don't think that's the reasoning. It's more if we put actual manpower or heavy investment in, and Ukraine loses anyway, what do we do? Our economy's already struggling.
@@SamBlipsexactly imagine cenk saying that „Palestinians need to concede territory to Israel” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 truth is Palestinians are in much more dire situation than Ukrainians
@@tfratello you have no clue what your talking about I should have said and he said why he was angry go back and listen again as I should have bfore I commented
@@Adam-fl9uc Scott Horton is far from just a “bearded weird guy.” He’s a seasoned expert in foreign policy who has spent years analyzing and critiquing the consequences of U.S. interventionism. Reducing someone with his knowledge and credibility to a personal insult is a weak attempt to dodge the substance of his arguments. If you actually engaged with what he’s saying instead of resorting to childish name-calling, you might realize he’s raising important points backed by extensive research. But I suppose it’s easier to dismiss what you can’t counter.
It wasn't "chance", the US, GB and other countries given their assurances in granting security to Ukraine, however, they didn't bother abiding to their assurances, and stated that word "assurances" doesn't mean anything. Ukraine was young, naive and optimistic country back then, so they believed in "assurances"
The debate completely overlooked the fact of Russia breaking the assurances set out in the Budapest memorandum. If a way is not found to provide a cast iron guarentee of Ukraine's sovereignty into the future, the Ukrainians may resort to making their own nuclear weapons. Wesley Clark may be a military man but he has a tremendous grasp of diplomacy and the dangers of appeasing dictators, not to mention a whole lot of common sense.
@@whekau2375 , please give the link where you found that info. because as I know there was no such information in the official document. thank you in advance)))
@whekau2375 untrue. I just re-reviewed th memorandum. There is nothing about ukraine being neutral. It is easy for anybody to verify this. Stop spreading mis-information!
@@rffromusa8319 Maybe because he studied it. I've lived in my home country for 20+ years and had no idea what was going on beyond my immediate vicinity. There is also the question of bias.
@allydea and "studying" anything in the USA government is always subject to interpretation. One so called expert will give a polar opposite side to the same story. Bias is exactly the correct word. If the information doesn't fit the narrative already in one's mind just keep looking until you find a "credible source" that confirms what is already in your head. Don't listen to the 50 other experts who doesn't have the same narrative.
(@26:53) Piers says he's heard 2 different versions, the Texan and the Ukrainian living in Ukraine, and Piers can't figure out which story is correct? Unbelievable
Did the people living in NYC understand why their towers were attacked? Did the soldiers in Iraq know about the conversation in the pentagon that Clark had? No, the people on the ground RARELY know what’s going on.
@@joshuacrosby8176yeah sure but you’re talking about single events. We are talking about centuries long oppression of the Ukrainian people that has been documented and studied. But now it’s being politicized and presented to American viewer as a debate. It is not a debate, these things had happened for centuries long before the US was even on the map. Learn history
Yeah I mean our politicians are only on video setting up the government of Ukraine in 2014. But she lives in Ukraine and said it’s not true so that history gets erased.
Two of the panel ignorantly regurgitate russian talking points in English, the other two actually speak and understand russian and have been hearing that garbage from the pigs mouth. easy to know who to believe....
@@tw31v3r Finland decided to join NATO due to fear of ruzzian invasion. russian aggression is the root cause of NATO expansion, it is your president fault.
I’m so confused by this. Did Obama have anything to do with the Ukraine stuff or not?? And she literally just said “not everything is about America” okay, so then why are we getting involved??? I don’t understand this. I know there are good people that are dying over there but why do we pick and choose what we care about??? America isn’t everyone daddy, right? So then they need to stay tf out of it. And clearly that’s what this lady wants.
The General owned him, he was just trying to sell his book of fiction, it's the second time I watched this and only noticed his background 😮 and I have a sneaky feeling Piers has get of that book action...
Anyone who doesn't see that endless wars are the goal and pitting citizens of these countries against each other is the goal, just hasn't had their eyes opened yet. This woman and Scott have much more in common than they do disagreements. Countries expand, always have, always will. Power is intoxicating. Nobody aspires to be head of state to reduce the size and power of government. Imagine what kind of world we would have if this wasn't the case. There would be zero hunger, no wars, and prosperity for all. But that's not good for power-hungry leaders and weapons manufacturers.
Too many military contractors sponsor US lobbyists to influence government policies and contracts which is very lucrative. Lobbyists often use various tactics, including personal relationships, campaign contributions, public relations campaigns, to sway government decisions in favor of their clients. Is it time to give the mandate to the people, not these politicians the choice of sending billions of our taxpayer's monies overseas! Please consider having this topic of discussion @Piers Morgan Uncensored
Just when Clark started saying „I actually spoke to” „I actually went to” everyone on the panel got nuked because they realized how much of a clowns they are
If putting a division of NATO in the borders of Russia Is not threat to Russia, then it should be ok if Russia put the same in the USA-Mexico border, right?
And what are they doing with this division? Will they get a biker bar at the border? No one would pay attention to it, except for a few jokes about what Russians are doing in Mexico because they ran out of teqila
@ think u saw a different video fam, scott and Clarke are on two different levels Clarke is a distinguished, accomplished veteran with many years of experience and knowledge. Dude knows his stuff
The General literally agreed with Scott's presentation of the facts when directly prompted. He even admits he didn't want to proceed with the plan of NATO enlargement at the time.
Im not a diplomat but I think the best course of action is to let Russia keep what it gained, nothing more and have Ukraine sign a treaty with Russia with a promise not to join NATO for 100 years, or whatever length. Joining NATO will be a no. Russia is gaining ground every day.
This is the type of uncensored episode I come here for. Yesterday was a horrific disaster. This has been one of the better episodes I've watched recently.
@@deadmanswife3625 Even the author, while I don't agree with him I enjoy having someone on the panel that is willing to push back on certain talking points in a mostly respectful manner.
@luiscrakson He still has a big case of TDS and the guy is still a liberal but he's become a less tolerable one lately, let's see how long it will last.
Thankful for any person like general Clark, who actually understand the situation and know how to protect Americans, Europeans and others from being killed and enslaved
Great to see Scott Horton finally get put on the spot where he has nothing but subjective statements. This was an enlightening conversation and General Clark did not try to make it sound like the west did everything right.
Excellent panel today. Everyone speaking was not shouting over the top of others and were articulating their points. This is the type of journalism we need!
Russia never applied, Putin apparently asked Clinton if such a thing was possible but never submitted an official application. He allegedly wanted to have more influence than the average member would have within the organization.
The answer initially was RF freely participating in Partnership for Peace and then Putin NOT formally applying since he chose to endlessly fearmonger to stay in power. How can the West answer if there is no request?
Exact opposite of reality. Scott is on an entirely different level and absolutely destroyed everything she said. Her arguments were lazy and emotional. Absolutely nothing of substance to offer.
Can someone tell me exactly why America has to fight for anybody? It’s not like our government is doing it because they’re just good guys lol I know there’s more to it but their meddling at all is just annoying.
Also there are words in it! I counted them after and it was a lot. If you want to quantify wisdom and authority, count the words, that's what I always say! Also: Banana Pink Marmot Ukulele Not Up Mister Coupon (building up my authority metric!)
I'm so tired of hearing that Ukraine provoked Russia to attack because it wanted to join NATO. But for some reason, everyone forgot that Russia also wanted to join NATO, and had a NATO base on its territory. So NATO is not the reason for the attack
@randyrowe6049 so you can understand reasons for bulling someone. Because russia acting like bully. They were not accepted into the company, so they take out their anger on those who are weaker than them and were also not accepted into this company. That's they reason.
"[Corruption is] in every government...but it's never the same as it is in Russia, where organized crime works as an arm of the government, connected to the intelligence agencies, to assure that [the leader] and his cronies get what they want." Exactly, that sounds EXACTLY like it is in Washington.
@ Sweet summer child, the Deep State has ruled in Washington since 1963. Whether its figurehead is a Bush or a Biden is less consequential than the difference between Putin and Medvedev.
Who needs the mainstream media? This was an amazing episode. Everyone had ample opportunity to express their beliefs and opinions. This is the evolution of truth, knowledge and understanding.
Truly, this had to be one of your best episodes: multiple perspectives presented, well-spoken, earnest and knowledgeable guests, great background and explanations given; Cenk wasn’t yelling…I learned a lot and feel I have a better understanding now. More like this, please.
This is the best episode yet. informative. Hard to tell which info is more accurate. The bearded guy and the Ukrainian girls rebuttal are very interesting. I would love to see more exchanges like this.
The Ukrainian doesn’t even know her revolution was organized by the US. She also bluntly lied about Zelenskys support. There’s still a 1/3 of the country that thought they should recede into Russia.
A General who lived through the entire thing and was highly involved in the topic vs. a wingnut freak show who wrote a book based that entirely relies on the Kremlin party line. Yeah, really hard to tell which info is more accurate.
@@chrisoconnor6187 obviously its scott, not hard at all, although im eastern european so i understand that you are unaware of whats going on, unfortunately even scott doesnt have the whole story
Hearing the side of a story from Wesley Clark, who was there at the time of collapse of Soviet Union, who saw the crisis in Eastern Europe, who personally contributed into talking with modern Russia about their concerns of NATO expansion, and to other countries that just gained independency from Soviet Union - is quite refreshing. Please, invite him more to conversations about Ukraine! Also, incredible Ukrainian Ana brought a difference into Russia's talking points that had been going on and on throughout previous episodes, enlightening another side of a coin is great too!
@@wivax9784 It’s interesting to hear perspectives like Wesley Clark’s, but let’s not ignore the historical context. NATO expansion, while framed as a defensive measure, was perceived by Russia as a threat-a concern acknowledged even by Western leaders at the time. Clark’s involvement wasn’t about genuine dialogue but about advancing NATO’s interests, often at the expense of regional stability. While Ana brings valuable insights, we must also consider how Western policies, not just Russian aggression, have shaped the current situation. Ignoring these factors doesn’t lead to a balanced understanding of the conflict.
yes, it is time for someone to call out this russian propagandist. makes sense to investigate this income, i am absolutely sure that Scott is smart enough to get money for it
What is your main takeaway from this debate?
Scott Hornton is a tool
That we really need Ukrainian voices to understand the conflict. Not just some Western fake-"libertarian" theorists.
There are two sides to every story clearly.
@PiersMorganUncensored liked the new format of you shutting your mouth, and listened for once
What Scott and Anna were each saying can co exist. The people of Ukraine could've wanted NATO protection at the same time as the US government saw it as an opportunity to overthrow the Ukranian gov't
I sat in amazement that Cenk sat silent for what seemed like an eternity. I like new Cenk.
he lost the big democrat money
He knows zero about this subject & would get crucified by Scott
@@matthewjamisonhe knows zero about any subject.
He kept silent because it’s not about Isreal 😂😂😂
@DonXardas indeed
The ignorant are still making out this conflict started in 2022 when in fact it started in 2014, piers is as uneducated about this conflict as he was about the issue 4 years ago.
2004 actually
@RatchildUK 1989 actually at the fall of the Berlin wall when U.S. agreed not to expand NATO on Russian borders
It was Russia that started it. The full scale invasion started 2022.
@@mfgreviews5028That wasn't an official agreement, it was to USSR not to Russia, and it was on the condition USSR doesn't invade and attack neighboring countries too. Russia invaded and attacked a whole lot of countries in the 90's. But ask Gorbachev who did that deal. Even he says it doesn't apply.
@@mfgreviews5028 was never written down
Very refreshing to not see Francesca today!
Amen!
I have to skip the ones with her or destiny. They are both insufferable.
oh come on. She is hilarious and you obvi havent stopped thinking about her since yesterday.
Yes and more yes. She removes entertainment.
God she was unbearable yesterday. Childish beeper joke and it didn’t even land. It was cringy to watch
Finally a voice from Ukraine to refute these lame Russian talking points. We need to listen to Ukrainians and more generally East Europeans who have real experience living under the Russian boot, not these so-called Western experts
Well said 👏
1000%
Amen. Finland agrees.
Like you know her to believe. I am sure they can easily find someone from Ukraine with different opinions. Just saying...
Then let Europe pay for it all. Stop stealing my money.
Piers is always saying" I spoke to Trump last week"
😂😂😂😂
Either they're best friends, or he's exaggerating😂
😂😂😂😂
He is NOT a MAGA grifter
@@0786RICARDOare YOU sure ABOUT that?
Turkey still own half of Cyprus and they have invaded and have backed rebels in Syria ....they are in NATO.....are we condemning Turkey yet?
Shut it. You know we only care about the conflicts they show in the media.
Turkey haven't advanced their occupation nor annexed land, evicted natives and built illegal settlements or broken international law since they invaded. I condemn the greek orthodox church for letting the banks taking all the citizens money, whilst their churches are adorned with gold and jewels
No Jews, no news. They only care about wars when the Jewish people are defending themselves.
turkey usa first in syria
What about what azeris did to Armenians in their ancestor's lands for the past 4 years with the help of Israel and Turkey? I have never once heard Pierce bring this issue up. The United States government is silent because they’re ignoring the fact that the dictator has been in the position for 23 years. Putin is a dictator, but Aliev is in the same position for as long as Putin is not a dictator.
Cenk rarely talks about Ukraine even on his own show. Piers just brought him on in case he gets angry and it can be clipped.
Absolutely
Pro gamer move by piers
😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Huh.
General Clark nearly brought tears to my eyes. As an American its hard to find strong voices in our country who understands the delicate games being played and knows why democracy and sovereignty is key to peace.
Not me as I remember what a liberal lunatic he is and how he has supported Obama and Biden
General Clark was amazing.
The exchanges showcased the sharpness of his memory and intellect, and together with Ana he carried the weight of subject-matter authority in the room, from two very different but mutually supportive perspectives.
But my favorite aspect was seeing the secondary effects his presence had on the dynamic between Ana and Scott. There was a palpable sense of relief when she saw that she wasn't alone in the defense of her home and cause.
Clark represents the America I believe in; open to self-reflection and criticism, but committed to standing for its principles.
It was weirdly therapeutic watching Scott repeatedly faceplant into an obstacle utterly unmoved by his bullying.
@apieceofstring it must be embarrassing for her to know that the world KNOWS her government is corrupt and stealing money meant to help the country.
That's a crock. He must have financial ties to Ukraine. He was good when he told us all about the list of 7 countries that Israel wanted us to attack, but he's now compromised.
Just google "Chile -> Allende -> Pinochet" and "Iran -> Mosaddeqh -> Shah Reza Phalavi" and evaluate what role the USA played! After enjoy talking about sovereignity, peace and democracy!
This is literally a million times more enlightening than when everyone is arguing and yelling at each other.
As Piers isn't expecting everyone to condemn Palestine.
I tune out anytime that starts...so I tune out often !!!! Halfway through now and I might make it to the end if this keeps up 👍
No, it isn't. Instead you let a neocon run the whole show, and very few other people speak. It's not enlightening. It's just flat out. Stupid, but in a different way. But it's still stupid
Cause no lefties
Amen to that.
A long form conversation between Scott and General Clark is a must. Make it happen Piers. The world needs this.
I have also some ionteresting theories - I should also speak with Xi, Trump and Putin. The world needs it.
General Clark with a nice Freudian slip there "Our company, errrr, our country". What are his financial ties to Ukraine and/or companies profiting in Ukraine???
@@improvingtimenow go find them instead of JAQing off.
@@improvingtimenow None
General Clark should be locked for corruption.
Pierce Morgan is the Jerry Springer of politics
no he's the Morton Downey jr
Wow you hit it perfect
Great analogy 😂😂 reminds me of something old Billy Burr would say 😂
But he puts together a diverse, informative panel.
🎯
If a nation can’t choose to join an alliance then they aren’t really independent. They only reason Russia won’t allow this (which again they should have no say) is because they want all of Ukraine. They might rest on what they’ve taken for a time but they’ll be back for the rest and they don’t want NATO in the way
Pretty sure blackrock will not allow that to happen.
If Mexico and Canada joined an alliance with Russia should the US accept that?
@@printinghappiness Well of course. That's simple logic. Hope you realize that was sarcasm.
@@printinghappinessif America had a recent history of invading and conquering Mexico and Canada, and an agreement guaranteeing their sovereignty and borders, yes.
You can have the Ukrainians but the territory is RUSSIAN
I have to give Piers credit for bringing together people from mainstream and alternative media to discuss these issues. The show has some problems, but overall I think it is a good platform for these types of discussions.
It’s my favorite show. Chaotic at times but always entertaining!
@@williamgervais9383 Not sure if he brings in the crazy left like steven and fran from yesterday just to show how crazy they are, i find it hard to listen to that kind of lunacy.
@@williamgervais9383”HOLD ON! HOLD ON! HOLD ON!”
I am open to any panel guests except Francesco F & Destiny, they’re both obnoxious and unwatchable.
@@AvaSawyer look at it this way. It builds your mental health.
I so appreciate this panel tonight. No over talking, no over shouting and diminishment of ideas and information. Active listening and exchange of thought. Civility. Thank you! More of this please.
As for Cenk... unbelievable
It's because they don't talk about Israel
Amen to that
What about the woman???
What a relief! Especially after last nights show.
Probably one of the best informative episodes of Uncensored I've ever seen!
Yes, I would like to see a one-on-one between Scott and Gen. Clark. Also between Scott and the Ukrainian lady. I could do without Cenk and the I-Killed-Osama guy.
🤦🏽♂️
So you admit you’re years behind 🤣
That says a lot, and none of it is good.
This guy is a shameless propagandist.
General Clark is a very impressive individual. People should really listen and absorb what he's saying.
@@drKnow1000 And keep in mind his prominent role as a member of the US military industrial complex. John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs are far more credible on this issue.
Im really amazed that Clark can talk about “the rule of law.” Has he forgotten that the US (NATO) illegally invaded Iraq and killed hundreds of thousands of civilians. They bombed Belgrade to pieces killing innocents. Is that the rule of law he thinks everyone should respect?
JEEZ dude,
They should re-do this panel but triple the time.
We would ALL be here for it.
What an amazing show (I just wish we had more time).
PLEASE make this happen Piers.
Most of us would LOVE to see this in podcast form!
POWERFUL show!
0:31:50
Did that nato head just call Ukraine Americans Company ?
Americas puppet ? Wow!
When the general joined the panel then the mood changed as we got to hear somebody aside from the lady from Ukraine who knew what they were talking about
@@rykson161 That's your takeaway?
Wow big brain
@@craiggodard6419Ukrainian is anti democracy American puppet.
@@craiggodard6419 General Clark swept the floor with them.
Is Cenk actually becoming sane or am I going crazy?
Right? 😂
He's grifting. Ana made a gradual genuine change. Cenk is just pretending.
@@stu805x your crazy! It's an act!
he is actully sane on most things like palestine but when it comes to trump he just cant hold himself, its the one topic he is crazy about.
the cure for TDS is TPS (Trump Presidency Syndrome.)
Eureka!
I feel like Piers had a discussion with these guests before the show about respecting other people’s time and being respectful all together. Especially after the episode from the day before… I’ve never seen Cenk sit so quietly. But after the previous episode with Francesca and Destiny, i wondered if it was turning into a Jerry Springer esque show. This was refreshing. If he did, good on Piers for talking with his guests prior to filming about etiquette.
Having the General and Ana actually provide context and real world experience to the discussion was really nice. The podcasting age of “just asking questions” armchair centrism is a scourge to the information landscape. Good luck out there.
And Down the Hole you go, come on you cant be serius 😂
@@pachachaz This russian bot can be safely ignored. You're right @MADDcatman let's bring truth back instead of Russian talking points :D
well said
Yeah general surely speaks sense and calls ukraine "our company" lmao😂
@@LDawgShizzlesays the ukranian bot
The conversation that needs to happen is between Wesley Clark and John Mearsheimer.
Or Jeffrey Sachs
Both legends
I was thinking of Douglas MacGregor.
Well said
@@OlympicLeprechaun lol this pos, why don't you go ahead and watch one or two videos from a year or two ago, how correct he's been so far on anything.
A calm balanced conversation of differing viewpoints on piers morgan? This is the best ep I’ve seen in a while. Please have more like this
Agree!
Balanced? Clark took more than half the time taken by the other participants.
@@hurryandleave9680 It almost amounted to monologue by Clark
He doesn't need to bring on this conspiracy nut guy every time tho.
and one of the "viewpoints" lied and spread misinformation, when you think its just as valid position as the other one :)
Pretty novel insights from the general really brought this conversation full circle in spite of the lopsided main guests on the topic. 3 People bold face telling the woman they will throw her to the wolves at her door as she hefts the axe they are too spineless to carry
Thank you for giving Ukrainians a chance to be heard
About time, one might say!
Lmao Ukraines been on top of the media for 2 years what are copers fantasizing about?
All the western news outlets have been ukrainian channels all along. And we have been made to believe that there's a devil and an angel fighting, and that the angel is winning, but the reality is quite different because the truth cannot be buried no matter how you try.
Ukies must be some of the most catastrophically ignorant, poorly informed and gullible people who ever walked the face of the earth.
They know nothing about the world beyond the borders of their own bankrupt and corrupt CIA run banana republic.
They are heard every single day
American politicians hears Ukrainian every week.
Best segment ever! Hardly nobody interrupted and lots of opposing viewpoints with evidence and history to back it up! What great content
"What an amazing movie, there were so many flashy lights and big booms!"
Disgustingly shallow analysis.
@@menkaragamble8175 Very deep take, lol....
Only one side has history. Thanks Clark.
@@menkaragamble8175 I love movies as well. What is one of your favorites?
It's so nice to watch/listen to show where you can learn/understand what they are saying without people trying to talk over one another.
It rarely happens here 😂😂
So true. I watched the one with Destiny and the brunette mouthy chick a couple of days ago - both of which never allow a conservative voice to be heard completely without interrupting them - and I had to fast forward many times because I can't stand listening to that kind of noise.
Huh.
Sure, but most of the time that's not what this show is and not what it tries to be. It's basically a politcal discourse version of the Jerry Springer Show.
You missed yesterdays show
I REALLY enjoyed this panel. A little conflict but not the same screaming over each other which is sometimes fun. General was great and informative and so good to hear that girl speaking as someone on the ground who lost her father. It’s personal. But we are where we are and ALL sides need to be heard. This was one of the best! Bring this panel back on to continue listening and learning from each other.
The guy talked too much. bring dave on here
Escuchar todas las partes? cuáles todas las partes? Este podcast es como la sociedad americana , viven viéndose el ombligo, faltan la gente de donesk falta lo que opinan los rusos
Oh just wait for the internet losers to cry over Clark doing a respectable debate. More like a qna panel 😂
"THAT GIRL" is a woman. Your terminology is condescending.
Why are they not talking about the Minsk agreements?
Agreements don't apply to certain countries.
They were never implemented, Russian separatists continued with offensive actions and the two sides continued fighting until it naturally died down.
Why would they? Russians/separatists continued to fight (attack) in spite of the armistice. They never intended to apply it (while requiring that Ukrainians do)! Russia never keeps its word.
@@Maplatter do oyu mean Ukranians bombed Russians for 8 years.
@@hrvojelasic5794Russians armed by Russia to carry out attacks against Ukraine?
Cenk Uygur has entered the chat. "Brace yourselves, men, We have a bumpy ride ahead."
He's a child getting a lot of tv attention and temper tantrums.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Can't stand him 😂
He hasnt even started talking yet and I am bracing myself.
@@IsaacParent It's a different subject so no
This is one of the best panels pierce Morgan has had. No one yelling over each other, even though they have wildly different opinions. I actually came away with ideas to think about. Well done
yes not only braggin pro russians
I walked away educated and wanting to listen to more. Also, I agree. This is one of the best panels I have seen in my last few months of watching this YT channel.
Only that obnoxious guy who repeats Russian talking points. Rest were fine.
@@IG7799-c4u scott horton is a rus paid asset indeed
@ you should look into Scott Horton, he’s probably the smartest guy on the panel. His books are incredibly well researched. He didn’t have the best showing here but he does good work.
So uplifting to listen to this enlightened and eloquent young woman Anastasiya, a great contrast to the coward from Texas at the other end of the panel.
History isn't talked about much and so it might be good to add that the Kyiv Empire flourished long before Moscow even began to transform from a swamp.
Cheers from Sweden!
You are delusional.
Cenk's suggestion is that we give up because we might lose if we try to win...just...brilliant.
Can you imagine Cenk making the same argument for... Palestinians? :T
It's a defeatist attitude, but I don't think that's the reasoning. It's more if we put actual manpower or heavy investment in, and Ukraine loses anyway, what do we do? Our economy's already struggling.
Cenk was reasonable, it's the 2 bearded guys that were king and pushing propoganda. 2 liars
@@Slashthekitsune It isn't
@@SamBlipsexactly imagine cenk saying that „Palestinians need to concede territory to Israel” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 truth is Palestinians are in much more dire situation than Ukrainians
Never seen Mr Clark this angry
He can't handle the truth getting out.
Lol he was calm it was mostly that bearded weird guy that was constantly raising his voice
Wesly Clark is brilliant!! He knows what he's talking about!! He didn't vote for Trump who knows nothing about foreign policy!!
@@tfratello you have no clue what your talking about I should have said and he said why he was angry go back and listen again as I should have bfore I commented
@@Adam-fl9uc Scott Horton is far from just a “bearded weird guy.” He’s a seasoned expert in foreign policy who has spent years analyzing and critiquing the consequences of U.S. interventionism. Reducing someone with his knowledge and credibility to a personal insult is a weak attempt to dodge the substance of his arguments. If you actually engaged with what he’s saying instead of resorting to childish name-calling, you might realize he’s raising important points backed by extensive research. But I suppose it’s easier to dismiss what you can’t counter.
the sheer amount of Russian propagandists ya'll have in USA is embarrassing.
The sheer amount of ukranians and the rest of nato stealing our money is embarrassing.
why, can't handle the truth son???
I'm half Russian btw, guess I'm just self hating or something, lol
Russians have always been quite good in disinformation business
@@adamborowicz7209 ..yep, lucky Muricans say the 'truth and nothing but the truth' everyday!!😅😅🤣
I'll say it again, Ukraine should have never given up their nukes for a "CHANCE" to join nato.
Great, now travel back in time or come up with something useful for the present.
those were USSR nukes not ukrainian nukes
As if they were theirs 😄
It wasn't "chance", the US, GB and other countries given their assurances in granting security to Ukraine, however, they didn't bother abiding to their assurances, and stated that word "assurances" doesn't mean anything. Ukraine was young, naive and optimistic country back then, so they believed in "assurances"
those nukes were USSR nukes not ukraine's, wake up :)))
One of the most informative and ordely sessions. Much respect to Wesley Clark.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Just wait for the boys that their fathers didn’t want will now try to „set the record straight” 😂😂😂
Anastasiya Paraskevova tells it like it IS! 😍💙🤗💙
The debate completely overlooked the fact of Russia breaking the assurances set out in the Budapest memorandum. If a way is not found to provide a cast iron guarentee of Ukraine's sovereignty into the future, the Ukrainians may resort to making their own nuclear weapons. Wesley Clark may be a military man but he has a tremendous grasp of diplomacy and the dangers of appeasing dictators, not to mention a whole lot of common sense.
The Budapest memorandum suggested Ukraine’s neutrality. Don’t talk about matters you don’t know about.
@@whekau2375 , please give the link where you found that info. because as I know there was no such information in the official document. thank you in advance)))
@whekau2375 untrue. I just re-reviewed th memorandum. There is nothing about ukraine being neutral. It is easy for anybody to verify this. Stop spreading mis-information!
@@whekau2375 "suggested" xDDDDD
@@catcarlson9070 Внеблоковый статус.
What you all aren’t seeing is Putin could care less about his own people or human life. He’d give his child if it meant he could instantly gain.
One of the best roundtables Piers Morgan has hosted, discussing Russia and Ukraine. Great panel of diverse knowledge and opinion.
The only knowledge displayed came from Ana and Wesley. What are you talking about diverse knowledge lmao?
You're easily pleased. It was a car crash. 😂 The only reasonably informed panelist was the guy furthest to the left.
I saw 1 pro zelensky Ukranian 4 americans , 1 brit... no pro one from Putin's government
@@ÆthelwulfOfNordHymbraLand2333 ahh sure he knows more about Ukraine than Ukrainians.
@@JimSendrethat doesn't make sense. Does an American hustory professor know more than a regular American citizen? Of course they do!
ALWAYS watching your show. Keep up the GREAT work
It's amazing to me that these grifters will claim to know more about these things than the people who actually experienced and lived through them.
Same! I don't understand why some rando from America is claiming to know more about a country than people living there.
You can live there and still be full of S.... So, i understand your argument, but the truth is a fine line my friend
@@rffromusa8319 Maybe because he studied it. I've lived in my home country for 20+ years and had no idea what was going on beyond my immediate vicinity. There is also the question of bias.
@allydea and "studying" anything in the USA government is always subject to interpretation. One so called expert will give a polar opposite side to the same story. Bias is exactly the correct word. If the information doesn't fit the narrative already in one's mind just keep looking until you find a "credible source" that confirms what is already in your head. Don't listen to the 50 other experts who doesn't have the same narrative.
@@rffromusa8319 Maybe because he has studied the issue more than anyone else on the panel and backs up all his assertions with documented facts.
(@26:53) Piers says he's heard 2 different versions, the Texan and the Ukrainian living in Ukraine, and Piers can't figure out which story is correct? Unbelievable
Did the people living in NYC understand why their towers were attacked? Did the soldiers in Iraq know about the conversation in the pentagon that Clark had? No, the people on the ground RARELY know what’s going on.
@@joshuacrosby8176yeah sure but you’re talking about single events. We are talking about centuries long oppression of the Ukrainian people that has been documented and studied. But now it’s being politicized and presented to American viewer as a debate. It is not a debate, these things had happened for centuries long before the US was even on the map. Learn history
Yeah I mean our politicians are only on video setting up the government of Ukraine in 2014. But she lives in Ukraine and said it’s not true so that history gets erased.
Two of the panel ignorantly regurgitate russian talking points in English, the other two actually speak and understand russian and have been hearing that garbage from the pigs mouth. easy to know who to believe....
@@joshuacrosby8176Thank you someone that thinks for themselves!
Piers should have had Jeffrey Sachs on this panel.
General Clark destroyed Scott’s talking points in a very serious and informative way.
😂😂😂 yea america the peaceful lamb had no interest in more military bases around the world
Ha ? I see the contrary !
@@tw31v3r Finland decided to join NATO due to fear of ruzzian invasion.
russian aggression is the root cause of NATO expansion, it is your president fault.
😁😁😅😅😅🤣🤣
@@tw31v3rever wondered why every single neighbor of Russia, hates Russia?
This was such a wonderful panel. Grateful to have been able to hear all of these points of view. Well done to all involved! ❤
Except for that NATO general 😢
The Russian propagandist on the panel may not be aware that he's a Russian asset. Someone should tell him.
😂😂
That's what I said!
I’m so confused by this. Did Obama have anything to do with the Ukraine stuff or not?? And she literally just said “not everything is about America” okay, so then why are we getting involved??? I don’t understand this. I know there are good people that are dying over there but why do we pick and choose what we care about??? America isn’t everyone daddy, right? So then they need to stay tf out of it. And clearly that’s what this lady wants.
The General owned him, he was just trying to sell his book of fiction, it's the second time I watched this and only noticed his background 😮 and I have a sneaky feeling Piers has get of that book action...
You people refuted none of his points, only call him a propagandist.
@@PapeySapote why should we repeat what the General and Ana said 🤔
Anyone who doesn't see that endless wars are the goal and pitting citizens of these countries against each other is the goal, just hasn't had their eyes opened yet. This woman and Scott have much more in common than they do disagreements. Countries expand, always have, always will. Power is intoxicating. Nobody aspires to be head of state to reduce the size and power of government. Imagine what kind of world we would have if this wasn't the case. There would be zero hunger, no wars, and prosperity for all. But that's not good for power-hungry leaders and weapons manufacturers.
"...destroyed our company...er...country." Freudian slip from General Clark
😂😂😂 that's why he's angry
Sorry but that NATO guy destroyed these clowns with facts.
Imagine trusting NATO lmfao
@@BG-xg5qz Imagine not having an argument lmfao. What did he say that is not true?
😅😅😅🤣🤣
Too many military contractors sponsor US lobbyists to influence government policies and contracts which is very lucrative. Lobbyists often use various tactics, including personal relationships, campaign contributions, public relations campaigns, to sway government decisions in favor of their clients.
Is it time to give the mandate to the people, not these politicians the choice of sending billions of our taxpayer's monies overseas! Please consider having this topic of discussion @Piers Morgan Uncensored
If it weren't for self entitled pr!cks like Putin, murdering themselves into power, there would be no need for the MIC.
EXACTLY!!! Someone that gets it !
Cenk realizing he is out of his league when the discussion goes too deep
Just when Clark started saying „I actually spoke to” „I actually went to” everyone on the panel got nuked because they realized how much of a clowns they are
@@Adam-fl9uc Ana from UKR is not a clown
How many countries have applied to Join the Russian federation ?
-15 lol oh no probably less becuase of chechnia, so probably -16
….
…Donetsk
Amazing job from Clark and Ana! Talking to Russian mouth pieces must be tiring, but the truth with prevail.
Millions of Z bots have brain wormed the simpletons in America.
You just explained it all. Ana and Clerk 🥰
You and 37 people have never read a book on the subject in ur life and it shows
@williamwest9204 None of the Z-lovers here have either.
She makes me wanna puke.
If putting a division of NATO in the borders of Russia Is not threat to Russia, then it should be ok if Russia put the same in the USA-Mexico border, right?
Do mexicans want it? 😂😂😂
@@hurrycane-mb8kzThe Cubans surely want a Russian base.
And what are they doing with this division? Will they get a biker bar at the border? No one would pay attention to it, except for a few jokes about what Russians are doing in Mexico because they ran out of teqila
Man Clarke owned that Russian mouthpiece Scott, dudes wacked out
I thought it was the opposite way round
@ think u saw a different video fam, scott and Clarke are on two different levels Clarke is a distinguished, accomplished veteran with many years of experience and knowledge. Dude knows his stuff
The General literally agreed with Scott's presentation of the facts when directly prompted. He even admits he didn't want to proceed with the plan of NATO enlargement at the time.
@ that was one topic
Well yeah, Scott was hardly able to respond.
Kudos to the General , true American and an honest man !
About time you finally got a person from Ukraine to discuss Ukraine. Seems like this bearded gut lives in another dimension-
Maybe he will have Russians talking about Russia.
What did the bearded guy say that was inaccurate? What views does he hold that belong to another dimension? Be specific
How about bringing a Russian to counter this Ukrainian? That would be a fair debate🤔
Go Ana!💪❤️
Im not a diplomat but I think the best course of action is to let Russia keep what it gained, nothing more and have Ukraine sign a treaty with Russia with a promise not to join NATO for 100 years, or whatever length. Joining NATO will be a no. Russia is gaining ground every day.
Imagine if Scott Ritter was there
Hes a liar and a paid russian asset, a total clown
Trump is Israel first, America second, unfortunately.
Really wish Scott Ritter was US president. Ritter would prevent ww3.
It's spelled Ritter the Diddler, fyi.
The diddler?
look up Scott Ritters criminal convictions
This is the type of uncensored episode I come here for. Yesterday was a horrific disaster. This has been one of the better episodes I've watched recently.
Ikr
Everyone is good today.
POSSIBLY except the author.
@@deadmanswife3625 Even the author, while I don't agree with him I enjoy having someone on the panel that is willing to push back on certain talking points in a mostly respectful manner.
@@GreasyTroll-TV I agree with you.
I guess I had to be a bit of a jerk and say it wasn't completely perfect LOL
No Francesca so..... ya 😆
Scott the fool....upset because the man he writes about tells him what really happens instead of what Scotts weird Russian fantasy was lol
Scott Horton is willing to sacrifice the hope for democracy of in the hearts of the people of Ukraine to Russian fears and bullying.
Unhinged Cenk is the best entertainment on the internet.
He’s been on a roll all month and I love it
I started to like him ever since Trump won 😂
Second only to Destiny
@luiscrakson He still has a big case of TDS and the guy is still a liberal but he's become a less tolerable one lately, let's see how long it will last.
He's changed a bit after the Trump victory. I actually like him now.
Thankful for any person like general Clark, who actually understand the situation and know how to protect Americans, Europeans and others from being killed and enslaved
I’ll tell you what. 450 million PLUS firearms in America. No one is enslaving anyone 🇺🇸
@@Yoshi-Mooch I like that! Thanks americans.
Love this lady 🇺🇦
Great to see Scott Horton finally get put on the spot where he has nothing but subjective statements. This was an enlightening conversation and General Clark did not try to make it sound like the west did everything right.
Excellent panel today. Everyone speaking was not shouting over the top of others and were articulating their points. This is the type of journalism we need!
This was probably the best episode thus far. From all sides. No shouting, no screaming. It was a pleasure. Thank you.
That is what I was thinking. Very good discussion, and learned much from each speaker.
Just kids , flapping their gums over a bag of lollies
Good job, Piers! This was a much better show than the recent panels. ❤
You mean a one man show.
General Clark, true legend, amazing history lesson for everyone.
😅😅😅🤣🤣
Very informative! Thank you for your guests Ana and General Wesley Clark!
I really appreciate this but i also have a question; what was the response of the west when Russia asked to join NATO?
Russia never applied, Putin apparently asked Clinton if such a thing was possible but never submitted an official application. He allegedly wanted to have more influence than the average member would have within the organization.
Watch Tucker's interview with Putin
The answer initially was RF freely participating in Partnership for Peace and then Putin NOT formally applying since he chose to endlessly fearmonger to stay in power. How can the West answer if there is no request?
Do you know the date for when RF applied to join? Because it didn't happen
No because they wanted a bunch of exemptions
Ana curb stomped Scott
LMAO. NO SHE DIDNT.
Exact opposite of reality. Scott is on an entirely different level and absolutely destroyed everything she said. Her arguments were lazy and emotional. Absolutely nothing of substance to offer.
Can someone tell me exactly why America has to fight for anybody? It’s not like our government is doing it because they’re just good guys lol I know there’s more to it but their meddling at all is just annoying.
🤣🤣🤣 She looked like an angry child.
We did not push NATO east. Russia pushes countries to NATO due to their actions, their aggressions.
Аню дякую вам за все 🇺🇦
I MADE A 4 MILLION PAGE BOOK AND REPEATED RUSSIAN PROPGANDA RESPECT ME
Lol pro ww3 propagandist big mad
Mald harder
Also there are words in it! I counted them after and it was a lot. If you want to quantify wisdom and authority, count the words, that's what I always say!
Also:
Banana Pink Marmot Ukulele Not Up Mister Coupon
(building up my authority metric!)
@@apieceofstring idk what to say your comment has more words I'm speechless
Cenk is back on. Grab your popcorn! 😂
😂
ya lol
cenk is a warmonger
And hide your chips
Love Cenk 💪
I'm so tired of hearing that Ukraine provoked Russia to attack because it wanted to join NATO. But for some reason, everyone forgot that Russia also wanted to join NATO, and had a NATO base on its territory. So NATO is not the reason for the attack
And they wouldn’t let them, so It created this us verse them. It’s not hard to understand
Exactly! @@randyrowe6049
@randyrowe6049 so you can understand reasons for bulling someone. Because russia acting like bully.
They were not accepted into the company, so they take out their anger on those who are weaker than them and were also not accepted into this company. That's they reason.
"[Corruption is] in every government...but it's never the same as it is in Russia, where organized crime works as an arm of the government, connected to the intelligence agencies, to assure that [the leader] and his cronies get what they want." Exactly, that sounds EXACTLY like it is in Washington.
Please, name at least one US president who was in power for over 25 years if you want to compare Washington to Moscow.
@ Sweet summer child, the Deep State has ruled in Washington since 1963. Whether its figurehead is a Bush or a Biden is less consequential than the difference between Putin and Medvedev.
Ukrainian streamer lady has Destiny ( Steven) merch in background lol
There like best friends lol
Yes, because unfortunately he's one of the few prominent voices online who cares about what's going on in Ukraine.
Ha ha ha!! Really??😂 That makes perfect sense!! 😂😂
@@edwardmcmanus ya they do like live streams together
That doesn’t dismiss her talking points, bro. She made some great points
This is going to be interesting
General Clark is the most impressive talker on here have seen.. possibly ever.
Levels above the others.
Who needs the mainstream media? This was an amazing episode. Everyone had ample opportunity to express their beliefs and opinions. This is the evolution of truth, knowledge and understanding.
Yes
Scott sounds like a kid who never learned to stand up to his bullies and would instead appease them.
this video was posted 6 minutes ago and somehow all these commenters have already formed their opinions on it.. INTERESTING.. lmao
bots
you can post while its going :D
Its easy for me I know I like Piers and Cenk, don't always agree with them but they are always worth hearing.
russian bots, same with X. We are fked
Just saw that North Korean are losing a lot of soldier fighting in Ukraine
Scott wrote a book on the countries he doesn't care about.
he has no knowledge about Ukraine for sure. calling Maidan "coup" is identical to calling American Revolution "sponsored by France coup"
at least he knows more and has a higher i.q then u, that i guarantee u!
And makes more money
Truly, this had to be one of your best episodes: multiple perspectives presented, well-spoken, earnest and knowledgeable guests, great background and explanations given; Cenk wasn’t yelling…I learned a lot and feel I have a better understanding now. More like this, please.
This is the best episode yet. informative. Hard to tell which info is more accurate. The bearded guy and the Ukrainian girls rebuttal are very interesting. I would love to see more exchanges like this.
The best episodes are always when Piers gets educated by people like Professor Mearsheimer and Professor Sachs.
The Ukrainian doesn’t even know her revolution was organized by the US. She also bluntly lied about Zelenskys support. There’s still a 1/3 of the country that thought they should recede into Russia.
A General who lived through the entire thing and was highly involved in the topic vs. a wingnut freak show who wrote a book based that entirely relies on the Kremlin party line. Yeah, really hard to tell which info is more accurate.
@@garymck5181 two clowns !
@@chrisoconnor6187 obviously its scott, not hard at all, although im eastern european so i understand that you are unaware of whats going on, unfortunately even scott doesnt have the whole story
Hearing the side of a story from Wesley Clark, who was there at the time of collapse of Soviet Union, who saw the crisis in Eastern Europe, who personally contributed into talking with modern Russia about their concerns of NATO expansion, and to other countries that just gained independency from Soviet Union - is quite refreshing. Please, invite him more to conversations about Ukraine!
Also, incredible Ukrainian Ana brought a difference into Russia's talking points that had been going on and on throughout previous episodes, enlightening another side of a coin is great too!
@@wivax9784 It’s interesting to hear perspectives like Wesley Clark’s, but let’s not ignore the historical context. NATO expansion, while framed as a defensive measure, was perceived by Russia as a threat-a concern acknowledged even by Western leaders at the time. Clark’s involvement wasn’t about genuine dialogue but about advancing NATO’s interests, often at the expense of regional stability. While Ana brings valuable insights, we must also consider how Western policies, not just Russian aggression, have shaped the current situation. Ignoring these factors doesn’t lead to a balanced understanding of the conflict.
Yes, it's interesting to see one of the people who contributed to the disaster we're now in.
@@SC-xh8ju How do you know the world would've been better and not a disaster without those people and their actions? You make no sense
I see a correlation with pro russia comments and terrible grammar.
Scott might as well declare himself a Russian agent, he’s been doing Russia’s bidding for quite a while.
WHY is DYLAN BURNS not on this show? He's the best pro-NATO debater on UA-cam.
Pro nato? NATO caused this
The only people worth listening to on that panel were Anna and Wesley Clarke. Thank goodness for them.
the butcher and warmonger
totally agree
this guy in the middle babbling about Zhelensky's wife buying jewelry (?) was pathetic at best
Yes
Да, лапшы оба наложили знатно, тебе неделю можно питатся снимая ее со своих ушей.
@@АндрейЛожкин-я1о❤
she's so good
This panel makes up for yesterday. Thanks!
Allow Scott Horton to debate one on one!!! 🥳🏴
yes, it is time for someone to call out this russian propagandist. makes sense to investigate this income, i am absolutely sure that Scott is smart enough to get money for it
Scott would destroy everyone else simply because he doesn’t hold back from the truth.