The Boeing 737 MAX 200 - The Special 737 That Can Carry Up To 200 Passengers

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 207

  • @ic3man689
    @ic3man689 4 роки тому +157

    They'll be as comfortable as a ride on the London Underground at rush hour

    • @AntonLoves737
      @AntonLoves737 4 роки тому +3

      I agree

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому +4

      “Satisflying with Ryanair”

    • @ic3man689
      @ic3man689 4 роки тому +5

      @@GiggityGiggity_27 I'm not gonna knock Ryanair, they're the best if you want low fares and cheap service, but the planes aren't comfy

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому +1

      @@ic3man689 it’s better to fly like easy jet or whatnot

    • @benwilson6145
      @benwilson6145 4 роки тому

      More like a Tokyo train during the rush hour, with the "packers".

  • @dewiz9596
    @dewiz9596 4 роки тому +89

    Great. So you have 200 miserable passengers, rather than just 180.

    • @muddyboots1881
      @muddyboots1881 4 роки тому +1

      😂👌

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому +1

      “Satisflying with Ryanair”

    • @alexandertsonev9017
      @alexandertsonev9017 4 роки тому +4

      If only people would stop complaining about having the chance to fly for €10, that would be great.

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому

      @@alexandertsonev9017 bruh it’s better to fly for 100$ and have something called SPACE AND COMFORT than pay 20$ and get cramped like a chicken in a chicken coop

    • @alexandertsonev9017
      @alexandertsonev9017 4 роки тому +12

      @@GiggityGiggity_27 If it was a transcontinental flight, then yes. But on a 2hr flight, I don't see the point in paying crazy money for a seat. Most people are exaggerating and whining too much, they don't realize that low-cost carriers gave the opportunity to explore the world while saving money on traveling costs, which is not a small thing. That's just my 2 cents, of course.

  • @Martin-hj4re
    @Martin-hj4re 4 роки тому +43

    It's Ryanair, what else did yall expect

  • @cdl0
    @cdl0 4 роки тому +40

    The passengers will need to be "certified" to fly on this insane plane!

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому +1

      “Satisflying with Ryanair”

    • @The_ZeroLine
      @The_ZeroLine Рік тому +1

      If you mean comfort, sure. If you mean safety, no. The 737 has one of the greatest safety records in history and since they’ve now both rescinded the rule allowing pilots to fly this without new type training and the software that caused problems for untrained pilots has been modified, it will be incredibly safe.

  • @gerrymccartney3561
    @gerrymccartney3561 4 роки тому +44

    737 Max Sardine Can

  • @cnordegren
    @cnordegren 4 роки тому +60

    The flying sardine coffin can.

  • @pix-point
    @pix-point 4 роки тому +63

    "Ryanair" and "comfort" is a contradiction in terms.

    • @SimpleFlyingNews
      @SimpleFlyingNews  4 роки тому +12

      I would disagree. I find them fine for short hops. - TB

    • @mbenidze
      @mbenidze 4 роки тому +1

      Gotta love that jetfuel smell in the cabins. :)))

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому +1

      @@SimpleFlyingNews but what about 4 hour flights, your legs are done, just get em amputated and your fine

    • @ybing
      @ybing 4 роки тому

      @@SimpleFlyingNews if it land at your destination LOL

    • @SimpleFlyingNews
      @SimpleFlyingNews  4 роки тому

      Every Ryanair flight I've taken has landed at its intended destination - TB

  • @leotard2536
    @leotard2536 3 роки тому +2

    just a tip, this variant has an extra door on the right side, behind the wing. This is the easiest way to visually distiguish it from the other models

  • @Davids_DC-10
    @Davids_DC-10 4 роки тому +6

    Considering the skepticism surrounding the Max I wouldn't be surprised if Ryanair slow deliveries to a trickle until the aircraft proves itself in revenue flights. 197 seats though sounds grim, it's bad enough already on the 800s.

  • @MWHM2
    @MWHM2 4 роки тому +9

    There must be a mixup, I think Boeing wanted to make some kind of airport shuttle bus but somehow the paperwork got mixed up

  • @CptMehdi05
    @CptMehdi05 4 роки тому +5

    Well, actually when I took my first flight, it was on a b737 MAX 8

  • @RedLP5000S
    @RedLP5000S 4 роки тому +20

    One more example of how the discontinuation of the 757 was a travesty.

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 4 роки тому +2

      The 757 was not a aircraft suitable to replace a 737. A 737 or a A 320 family aircraft has a wingspan of less than 36 m, which means they are in the category C. Most airports are optimized for this category, and the taxiways are short for this smaller aircraft. The 757 has 38 m wingspan and is category D together with widebodies like the 767 or the A 310, they cost more landing fees and the slots for this aircraft at the airport buildings are less common (there are less numbers of slots) than for category C.

    • @bikerguychris33
      @bikerguychris33 4 роки тому

      According to an article I've read, the 757 might coming back as the 757 Plus, basically a modernised version that has new engine's, avionics, a new wing or wing improvements, new sky interior etc...
      It also said the passenger version of the 767 could be re-engined with GE GEnx 2B's and brought back as the 767-X.
      It's thought that the 757 Plus/767-X will be Boeing's NMA.

    • @bonkerbanker
      @bonkerbanker 3 роки тому

      Ryanair only fly 737 so all other aircraft is not an option.

    • @GodzilarOG7337
      @GodzilarOG7337 3 роки тому +1

      @@simonm1447 I do see your point however I don't necessarily agree with all of it. Yes it may be a cat D aircraft and that would imply some working around to fit in some of the small destinations and airports they fly to. But the 757 is an actual 200+ airplane, it's sits so high that it wouldn't be a problem fixing big fuel efficient high bypass ratio engines and it has a slower vref than the 737 which would make it suitable for shorter field performance.

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 3 роки тому +1

      @@GodzilarOG7337 Of course high bypass turbofans would fit under a 757 wing (the aircraft has similarities to the 767), but it could not beat a 737/A 320 series aircraft in fuel consumption on shorter to medium long routes. The wing area is around 50 % bigger compared with a 737, which enables a higher MTOW and more range, but causes also more drag.
      So it may have made sense to develop a Neo variant of the 757, but it's clearly no aircraft which can really replace a 737.

  • @TCSMaingot
    @TCSMaingot 4 роки тому +3

    I feel like most of the people complaining about Ryanair in the comments haven't actually ever flown on Ryanair. Or possibly never even been on a plane. Ryanair is dirt cheap and the comfort is above what I would expect in my opinion.

    • @SimpleFlyingNews
      @SimpleFlyingNews  4 роки тому +2

      I'd agree, I fly Ryanair more than any other airline, and have only ever had one issue, which was resolved by the airline! - TB

    • @dinostudios6579
      @dinostudios6579 4 роки тому

      I agree. I have never flown on any low cost airline, but I think I think its fine. 10€ for a two hour flight is a steal. Especially on a shorter than one hour flight I would rather save the money and deal with a bit less room.

  • @annndukumutua833
    @annndukumutua833 4 роки тому +11

    It could've worked for Ryanair but others eh not so much incredible work

  • @StridesandSummits
    @StridesandSummits 4 роки тому +13

    I am disappointed you didn't talk about _how_ they made it possible to get 200 people on board and what makes this aircraft unique.
    Technically this is a different aircraft type, known as the 737-8200. Had anybody spotted the mid-cabin door not present on any other 737-8? 😉

  • @Romeojulietless
    @Romeojulietless 4 роки тому +14

    Comfortable ? Do you mean before or after they read the word Max on the safety leaflet ?

  • @GiggityGiggity_27
    @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому +4

    “Satisflying with Ryanair”

  • @markjarvis7637
    @markjarvis7637 4 роки тому +12

    Typical Ryanair, they virtually give the seats away, pack them to the gunwales and charge for everything on board

  • @ericbooth4772
    @ericbooth4772 4 роки тому +1

    When is this shit going to stop? 200 people on a Max 8? This is fucking crazy!

  • @stradivarioushardhiantz5179
    @stradivarioushardhiantz5179 4 роки тому +5

    Legroom.....?🤔🛫
    In fact, passengers are looking the best ticket price for each flight😎🛫....this why cabin length matter🤓

  • @azmike1956
    @azmike1956 4 роки тому +8

    Ryan should use them on flights no longer than 1 hour in duration.

  • @MWHM2
    @MWHM2 4 роки тому +4

    ‘No mate 200 is not comfortable, take 3 seats out, the pilots still need to have a seat’

  • @joncalon7508
    @joncalon7508 4 роки тому +3

    This video would've done really well with a seat map showing just how the heck they managed to fit 197 people into the aircraft. Did they do away with the overhead bins and slightly overlapped the seats? gone to an 8 abreast seating layout? Forced people to stand the entire flight?

    • @astupidmidge
      @astupidmidge 4 роки тому +1

      The Wikipedia page say they removed 3 catering trolleys to fit the extra seats

    • @Sheldon-yc5uh
      @Sheldon-yc5uh 4 роки тому

      I reckon RyanAir could play musical seats with the toilets and gain two extra places. And if they did away with the First Officer, there's another seat and bang, back up to 200. Genius!

    • @joncalon7508
      @joncalon7508 4 роки тому +1

      @@Sheldon-yc5uh The way ULCC's are going, they would do away with the pilots and flight deck if they could. And then they'd have the gall to charge premium fares for the front-facing window seats too!

    • @bcshelby4926
      @bcshelby4926 4 роки тому

      ...Ryanair actually did consider a "stand up" seat for a bit which was kind of like those "leaning" benches at bus stops that allowed you to take a bit of the load off, but didn't let you fully sit down.

  • @korvapuikko
    @korvapuikko 4 роки тому +12

    That's 200 more than the normal ones.

  • @2HellWUtube
    @2HellWUtube 4 роки тому

    Boeing 737 MAX/8200, the Namechanger.

  • @therandomafghanguy148
    @therandomafghanguy148 4 роки тому +6

    This plane sounds very cramped to my point of view lol, keep up the good work😊

  • @stein1385
    @stein1385 4 роки тому +1

    packing more people into a hole in the ground from 27000 feet is not a good move glad they held off on that approach

  • @bcshelby4926
    @bcshelby4926 4 роки тому

    ...well Ryanair did consider "stand up" seats to cram more bodies in their existing aircraft.
    Considering their reputation for rough landings, not sure if MCAS would be the only safety concern. particularly given the larger diameter LEAP engines with that stubby undercarriage.

  • @cameronbutler2318
    @cameronbutler2318 4 роки тому +1

    We have ourselves to blame for high density planes. The passenger demands cheap fares.... this is what you get.

  • @rickjohnson3215
    @rickjohnson3215 3 роки тому

    This seems like a replacement for the 757 which was a cattle car for the economy flyer. I flew in the 757 from Shannon Ireland to Chicago. It was not an enjoyable experience. If the 737 max is to replace it I’m not sure it would be an improvement

  • @maxcelcat
    @maxcelcat 4 роки тому

    This video entirely omits what makes this model unique - it has extra exit doors. You could have spent a couple of seconds explaining that.

  • @stefsd11
    @stefsd11 4 роки тому

    Airbus got a new order from Sky Express for 6 new A320 neos. Might be a nice video idea and positive news considering the low number of orders from airlines these last couple of months.

  • @journeyingjohn3275
    @journeyingjohn3275 4 роки тому +1

    Assuming RyanAir stick to their existing seat pitch but shift to slimline seating, it will remain more comfortable / generous than the massively over rated BA short/midhaul fleet that deliver a trult densified experience in some of the most uncomfortable seats in the air, globally.

    • @mattharbon
      @mattharbon 4 роки тому

      Odd, I flew shorthaul with BA the day after a longhaul flight with Emirates, BA was far comfier.

    • @journeyingjohn3275
      @journeyingjohn3275 4 роки тому

      @@mattharbon presumably then you weren't in one of their newer hyper densified lower seat pitch than Ryanair a320/321s? Or perhaps the journey was more than a couple of years ago?

    • @mattharbon
      @mattharbon 4 роки тому

      @@journeyingjohn3275 A321 in February. Looked refurbished, very pleasant compared to the A380.

    • @journeyingjohn3275
      @journeyingjohn3275 4 роки тому

      @@mattharbon well factually assuming you were in the same class you would have had significantly less space on BA and of course no catering

    • @mattharbon
      @mattharbon 4 роки тому

      @@journeyingjohn3275 Less space, possibly. Seats were comfier though, which is more important. I had my bag shoved under the seat in front so wouldn't have had legroom anyway. For a 90 minute flight, I wouldn't expect catering beyond the trolley service provided really.

  • @dominicindoubt
    @dominicindoubt 4 роки тому +1

    I always click on the thumbnails thinking I’m gonna watch DJ’s Aviation.

  • @Kipetio
    @Kipetio 4 роки тому +7

    i know it was fixed and re done but im still scared to fly the 737 max.

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому

      I’ve been on it before (before it was grounded) very nice plane, very safe, nice ect

    • @TheOwenMajor
      @TheOwenMajor 4 роки тому +1

      It was never really all that "broken".
      The crashes were directly caused by poor pilot training and poor matainence from the third world airlines that were using them.

    • @Kipetio
      @Kipetio 4 роки тому +1

      @@TheOwenMajor what about mcas thing

    • @TheOwenMajor
      @TheOwenMajor 4 роки тому +1

      @@Kipetio The issue with the MCAS system was that it had a single point of failure, the AOA sensor malfunctions the MCAS system malfunctions.
      That however is a minor issue, because the MCAS system can be easily and quickly turned off, something western pilots knew how to do.

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому

      @@TheOwenMajor true

  • @mrpullafastone
    @mrpullafastone 4 роки тому +1

    Not worried about comfort. I'd be more worried about it actually being safe to fly with

    • @brandonsaviation9967
      @brandonsaviation9967 4 роки тому +1

      it’s passed it’s safety certificates in europe and North America

    • @mrpullafastone
      @mrpullafastone 4 роки тому +1

      @@brandonsaviation9967 i know. It also passed its certification the first time round.

  • @Ananth8193
    @Ananth8193 4 роки тому

    Wonderful video ❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @pjconnolly
    @pjconnolly 4 роки тому +2

    I have flown a lot with Ryan air, i will never fly in this thing.

  • @mingming9604
    @mingming9604 4 роки тому +6

    sardine class....

  • @V1Fleetz
    @V1Fleetz 4 роки тому

    200 passengers isn't a big deal for 737, right?

  • @bladerezgaming6785
    @bladerezgaming6785 4 роки тому +1

    Who the fuck uses the same MCAS when the max 8 got removed in 2019 when it started in 2014
    Without MCAS it would live until 2800

  • @rovercoupe7104
    @rovercoupe7104 4 роки тому +5

    Cannot get excited about the 737. M.

  • @RICHM7BV7
    @RICHM7BV7 4 роки тому +1

    Comfortable enough for me, I'm interested in the lowest fare possible.

  • @Brick-Life
    @Brick-Life 4 роки тому

    lots of friends to ride with your

  • @pedroSilesia
    @pedroSilesia 4 роки тому +3

    So many moaners in the comments section. This is simple as that you don't like Ryanair you don't fly it. Take your own jet instead if you don't like. Let me guess you are first to book Ryanair flight when you see £14 ticket right? Every other short haul airline has the same leg room.

  • @danizanzibar4344
    @danizanzibar4344 4 роки тому +1

    There is NO fucking way im sitting in a 737-max EVER

  • @andrei7461
    @andrei7461 4 роки тому

    so how is it different from the MAX 10?

    • @researchanything
      @researchanything 3 роки тому

      See their sfecification on Boeing's web official or on wikiped.

  • @Camerenreynolds
    @Camerenreynolds 3 роки тому

    I’m all excited about the max being returned to the skies as safely as it has but 197 seats on a MAX-8. Heck no

  • @TJK152
    @TJK152 4 роки тому

    It would be better if the max 200 was just a modern 737-200 with leaps.

  • @ErraticPT
    @ErraticPT 4 роки тому

    Ryanair giving up 3 seats? 😲
    Suppose they'll use it either as a marketing strategy of "1mm extra leg room if you pay another £30" or just simply slap another £30 onto all fares to "compensate" for being so generous.

  • @PlanesAndGames732
    @PlanesAndGames732 4 роки тому +1

    Then what's the point of the MAX 9?

    • @kyleabram2606
      @kyleabram2606 4 роки тому +2

      I think that the 737max 8200 is basically the fuselage of a max 8 with the same capacity of a max 9. The main difference will be the passenger's comfort onboard.

    • @chingweixion621
      @chingweixion621 4 роки тому

      @@kyleabram2606 I believe the range favours the 737-8200. Just slightly.

  • @ybing
    @ybing 4 роки тому

    nice... 197 seats compare to 200, that;s really a lot more space and comfort LOL

  • @johniii8147
    @johniii8147 4 роки тому +1

    You don’t fly carriers like Ryan Air. for comfort. It’s all about the lowest. fare possible they know their market

  • @DavidHill-xe6gc
    @DavidHill-xe6gc 3 роки тому

    But the max 10 carries 230 people

  • @victorgrasscourt3382
    @victorgrasscourt3382 4 роки тому +1

    I will never get on one.

  • @thegreatafrican3367
    @thegreatafrican3367 4 роки тому

    Well profits over anything else I see

  • @longfang98
    @longfang98 4 роки тому

    It was a game changer, just not in the way you thought.

  • @leesantos9711
    @leesantos9711 4 роки тому +2

    Rather fly in a 50 year old 737 -200 .

    • @bcshelby4926
      @bcshelby4926 4 роки тому

      ...at least the engines on those fit nicely under the wings at the centre of gravity so the aerodynamics are more balanced and no need for a kluge like MCAS. So they're a little noisier and not as efficient. 737-200s are still operating in Yukon and Northwest region of Canada as they can land on an unpaved runway without ingesting foreign matter into the engines.
      53 years ago the 737 was a great concept as it's mission which was to bring jet service to small town airports without the need for special handling equipment (it even had it's own self contained boarding stairs) hence the reason for the stubby undercarriage. Boeing just milked it too far given the effect of the engine placement on handling and to placate the airlines who were too cheap to retrain aircrews on a "new type" came up with MCAS to make flying it it "feel" like the NG version.
      As I understand, after re-certification, aircrews (at least in the States) will now be required to retrain on the Max series as a "new type" anyway. Over 300 lives and almost two years lost for nothing.

    • @leesantos9711
      @leesantos9711 4 роки тому +1

      @@bcshelby4926 Absolutely, I believe the 200 model ended in 1988 !

  • @maxb829
    @maxb829 4 роки тому +4

    200 seats on a self-crashing plane. No thanks

  • @reeeec
    @reeeec 4 роки тому +3

    Look a flying sardine coffin

  • @hubalahu
    @hubalahu 4 роки тому +14

    I really hate to see this plane fly again.

    • @christoohunders5316
      @christoohunders5316 4 роки тому +1

      What's to hate is the stupidity of tourists that will fly on them without thinking ... manufacturing consent has never worked so well, so many people are brainless

  • @boblinda1738
    @boblinda1738 4 роки тому +7

    I will avoid that plane like the plague. Shame on Boeing!

  • @VexifyGaming
    @VexifyGaming 4 роки тому +2

    Hi

  • @marcs4091
    @marcs4091 4 роки тому

    Now with 20% more killing power!

  • @miks564
    @miks564 4 роки тому +4

    Not relevant to me. I never fly Ryanair. ...I don't think I'll ever fly on a MAX either.

  • @q80aziz
    @q80aziz 4 роки тому +5

    Hope it will fly straight and level ... Otherwise the cost in lives will be even higher ( Heavens forbid )

    • @davidoldham7476
      @davidoldham7476 4 роки тому +2

      There's always a hater with some banal inane quip whenever this aircraft is brought up....try to stiffle yourself going forward....like a useless damn dog on a bone.

    • @q80aziz
      @q80aziz 4 роки тому +1

      @@davidoldham7476 Mr. Oldham take it easy please don’t blow your lid up . Apparently you work for Boeing or have shares in the company . If you had a loved one among the 346 who perished due to Boeing’s criminal negligence you would be saying things differently . Stay safe

    • @TheOwenMajor
      @TheOwenMajor 4 роки тому

      @@q80aziz If you have a loved one who died you should blame the crappy pilots and maintenance of the third world airlines that crashed.
      Boeing cut corners on the MCAS system for sure, but any reasonably intelligent pilot should have figured out pretty quick why the trim wheel was going crazy. Hmmmm maybe it's the system that alters the trim?

    • @q80aziz
      @q80aziz 4 роки тому

      @@TheOwenMajor Cutting corners and insisting that additional pilot training and simulator time was not needed is the cause of the crashes . Should third world airlines hire top gun American pilots to fly their aircraft as well as maintenance crews ?
      Boeing wasted its century old reputation with such an aircraft and the number of cancelled orders confirms the once aviation giant is going under .
      As a proud third world citizen I must say thank God for Airbus and bravo Europe .

    • @TheOwenMajor
      @TheOwenMajor 4 роки тому

      @@q80aziz Airlines control the training. western airlines included the MCAS system in their training programs. That's why the few times it happened to western airlines(And it was few because if you properly maintain the AOA sensor you don't have issues) it was hardly of note.
      Consumers have short memories, and airlines will be even more concerned with economics going forward. The FAA, Canadian and European authorities have allowed the Max to continue to use the same type rating which was the goal all along.

  • @Brick-Life
    @Brick-Life 4 роки тому

    never seen a ryan air plane because i dont live in europe

  • @RicardoFerreiraMiranda
    @RicardoFerreiraMiranda 4 роки тому +3

    Ryan air is going by through the drain 😂

    • @GiggityGiggity_27
      @GiggityGiggity_27 4 роки тому +1

      “Satisflying with Ryanair”

    • @pedroSilesia
      @pedroSilesia 4 роки тому

      you know shit about business don;'t you? Look at their ratios and compare with other airlines. Ryanair will be the first to survive.

    • @RicardoFerreiraMiranda
      @RicardoFerreiraMiranda 4 роки тому +1

      @@pedroSilesia So you're the one who's paying their debts before default!?

  • @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis
    @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis 4 роки тому

    Isn’t that the max10.

  • @geoffhobster5814
    @geoffhobster5814 4 роки тому

    The 737 800 which Ryanair are flying right now have 33 rows of 6 which is 198 passengers. We returned to our home in Spain last week and made a point of remembering

    • @lukegriffiths6569
      @lukegriffiths6569 4 роки тому +1

      The -800 carries 189 pax, 31 rows of 6, and 1 of 3 (1st row adjacent to forward galley)

    • @geoffhobster5814
      @geoffhobster5814 4 роки тому

      @@lukegriffiths6569 next time we fly will check again

  • @itsnaveenn
    @itsnaveenn 4 роки тому +2

    UA-cam's broken Ya drunk again no views 2 likes (1 me)
    Lollllllllllllllzzzzz

  • @dcviper985
    @dcviper985 4 роки тому +2

    I'd never fly Ryanair. I won't fly Spirit, either.
    Although, given a choice between the two, I'd rather fly on Spirit's Airbuses. Boeing forgot how to build airplanes.

  • @aerohk
    @aerohk 4 роки тому +1

    197, how generous

  • @anjingUK
    @anjingUK 4 роки тому +4

    200 more passengers to die when it crashes then

  • @nodlimax
    @nodlimax 4 роки тому

    The 737 MAX is just one more reason not to fly with Ryanair. As if there aren't enough reasons for that already...

  • @hornet8928
    @hornet8928 4 роки тому +3

    Uhhh... Ryanair 737 MAX? Thats not good.

  • @richarddebosek1187
    @richarddebosek1187 4 роки тому +1

    They will be unbearable. Southwest’s 737-609’s are barely comfortable with 175 seats.... the extra 22 seats for Ryanairwill be barbaric for anyone over 5’11”.

    • @marcuswestman3334
      @marcuswestman3334 4 роки тому

      you do realise that this aircraft is longer and have a different galley and toilet layout?

    • @richarddebosek1187
      @richarddebosek1187 4 роки тому

      @@marcuswestman3334 my typo m. Meant to say 737-800

    • @lukegriffiths6569
      @lukegriffiths6569 4 роки тому

      Its an extra 8 seats, not 22, and its the same length as a -800

    • @lukegriffiths6569
      @lukegriffiths6569 4 роки тому

      @@marcuswestman3334 8200 and -800 are same length (39.47m) just a different config

    • @marcuswestman3334
      @marcuswestman3334 4 роки тому

      @@lukegriffiths6569 I know, I fly both versions! The individual I was replying to was talking about the - 600 (edit, I know see that was a typo on hus part). Anyways, most of the space is coming from shrinking the galleys for tge cabin crew and removing the 2 aft toilets (into the aft bulkhead).

  • @skylineXpert
    @skylineXpert 4 роки тому +1

    Le avion des sardinnés

  • @davidwebb4904
    @davidwebb4904 4 роки тому

    737-8200

  • @vietnguyenduc6670
    @vietnguyenduc6670 4 роки тому

    Vietjet air from vietnam oder 100 boeing737 max 200

  • @bluemilk4909
    @bluemilk4909 4 роки тому

    How many beans will they shove in the flying can?
    200.
    Oh crap.

  • @TheFlyingBusman
    @TheFlyingBusman 4 роки тому

    Flying cattle wagon. That said, I think I would rather take the cattle wagon.

    • @bcshelby4926
      @bcshelby4926 4 роки тому

      ...speaking of cattle wagons, surprised Southwest, Spirit Air, and Frontier are not interested in it.

  • @Think_Inc
    @Think_Inc 4 роки тому

    No aircraft ever made by Boeing( except maybe for the 787 and 747) has been comfortable!

  • @itsnaveenn
    @itsnaveenn 4 роки тому

    1 all

  • @EUROWEFILMS
    @EUROWEFILMS 4 роки тому

    I have flown many many times with Ryan air in the 737 800 & cannot fault the service or equipment, however Boeing have gone too far by trying to make a silk purse out of a pigs ear all in the name of $$$$'s
    The 737 has past its time & no amount of add ons will work, Boeing need to do a redesign from the bottom up. I will never ever fly in the Max end of story.

  • @michaelfiedler1419
    @michaelfiedler1419 4 роки тому

    I don't feel sad for Michael Leary. His airline is one of the worst airlines, both by service and more important by treatment of staff.

  • @Sanginius23
    @Sanginius23 4 роки тому

    Ryanair is the worst flying experiance you can have in Europe.
    But the flights are usual short 1h - 2h and they are very very cheap

    • @bcshelby4926
      @bcshelby4926 4 роки тому

      ...Frontier and spirit in the States are not much better with a 28" seat pitch in standard toruist.

  • @abhignansai8313
    @abhignansai8313 4 роки тому +1

    One of the first😂

  • @joshuacam8175
    @joshuacam8175 4 роки тому +1

    Fly one of these and you’ll feel empathy with sardines. Ryanair is crap 💩. I’d rather fly Easyjet

    • @SwissMarksman
      @SwissMarksman 4 роки тому

      Wouldn't be suprised if the CEO fucks around in a Private Jet.

  • @toninocars
    @toninocars 4 роки тому

    Ryanair are one of the worst airlines in UK and now they can't wait to get the flying coffin, never buy tickets with them even for £1.

    • @SimpleFlyingNews
      @SimpleFlyingNews  4 роки тому

      I would and do 😅 Never have an issue with them. - TB

  • @jackconrad2714
    @jackconrad2714 4 роки тому

    4th

  • @ZaneBlaney
    @ZaneBlaney 4 роки тому

    3rd

  • @WilsonLove.
    @WilsonLove. 4 роки тому

    Hello