Macroeconomics Unit 3 COMPLETE Summary - National Income and Price Level

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
  • This video covers all of the key points of Unit 3 from the AP Macroeconomics Course Exam Description (CED). Multipliers, Aggregate Demand (AD), Short-run Aggregate Supply (SRAS), Long-run Aggregate Supply (LRAS), Long-run equilibrium, Inflationary Gap, Recessionary Gap, Long-run Adjustment, and Fiscal Policy.
    For more help with unit three, there are content reviews, review games, and practice exercises for you at: www.reviewecon...
    To support this channel, like and subscribe, then purchase the Total Review Booklet from ReviewEcon.com: www.reviewecon...
    Follow me on twitter: / apeconguy
    or
    Follow me on facebook: / reviewecon
    Note: Topics are out of order because this is the oder in which they are covered in the ReviewEcon.com Total Review Booklet.
    Note: AP©, Advanced Placement Program©, and College Board© are registered trademarks of the College Board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse, this material.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 91

  • @stephaniecastro9200
    @stephaniecastro9200 3 роки тому +73

    Thank you!! You literally just taught me the whole unit so easy and to the point! Ready for my unit test next class!

  • @drewgoodove3259
    @drewgoodove3259 3 роки тому +27

    This channel is going to be the reason I pass my econ exams.

  • @graham8643
    @graham8643 3 роки тому +24

    This is the only video of this whole unit I could find, and man it was worth the hour and a half of rewinding to understand and take notes. Thank you!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому +4

      You're very welcome. I have a complete video for every unit, I hope the rest are just as helpful!
      Good luck with your exams!

  • @vanessaanaya9520
    @vanessaanaya9520 Рік тому +4

    You ARE the reason I am able to understand Macro and getting me through the semester! God bless you, I hope you hit the powerball. I will be returning when I take Micro next semester! THANK YOU!!!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  Рік тому +1

      So glad to know my videos helped you! Good luck with the rest of this term and micro next term!!

  • @LeoChen-v6z
    @LeoChen-v6z 5 місяців тому +1

    Holy moly!! this channel is honetly underrated, those full summary videos are what is helping me pass my exams!!! helps me undersstand the concepts and rather than bombarding with equations. thankyou!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  5 місяців тому

      You're very welcome! Good luck with those exams!

  • @noahschoenbaum3860
    @noahschoenbaum3860 3 роки тому +16

    Thank you! This was so helpful

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому

      I am so glad. 😀 You're very welcome!

  • @ashishronak5774
    @ashishronak5774 10 місяців тому +1

    You are the main reason why I do so good on the my ECON Tests. I really appreciate you making it so easy to understand. Continue to do what works for you.

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  10 місяців тому +1

      You're very welcome! Good luck on your next test!!

  • @natecanonico1545
    @natecanonico1545 4 місяці тому +4

    Hey how was your day? Taking the macro test tomorrow, wish me luck! Thank you for everything

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  4 місяці тому

      My day is going great! Good luck tomorrow! 😄

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  4 місяці тому

      The AP macro exam is on Friday, but lots of colleges are starting Finals.

  • @sukhmansidhu4453
    @sukhmansidhu4453 Рік тому +1

    A literal godsend! Thank you so much for helping me review macro for the ap exam after a semester gap!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  Рік тому +1

      You're welcome!
      Good luck on your exams!

  • @mazinsaleh3489
    @mazinsaleh3489 3 роки тому +4

    Every summary is so helpful every time

  • @alterego7305
    @alterego7305 2 роки тому +2

    Thanks for everything, you're helping a ton of people out.

  • @cocoodb7697
    @cocoodb7697 3 роки тому +4

    🐐 he’s like my teacher but good at his job

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому +1

      Sometimes it just takes someone saying in a slightly different way for it to make sense.
      Good luck on your exams!

  • @hackingchampion
    @hackingchampion Рік тому +3

    After 2 years, this video is still maintaining the demand

  • @Lana-or5dz
    @Lana-or5dz Рік тому +1

    Glad!!! I found these videos. I Currently have a low C need to maintain it to pass this class and finally move on ..
    Thank you so much for providing these videos they truly help with giving you a better understanding on the material because when I be reading them textbooks 📚 I don’t be retaining or knowing what the hell I’m reading .. once Again thank you! I truly do appreciate all your videos.

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  Рік тому

      You're very welcome! Good luck with the rest of the class!!

  • @kiantaewebbfan5028
    @kiantaewebbfan5028 3 роки тому +2

    You deserve more subs, you’ve helped me out so much. Thanks 👍

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому

      They're coming slowly. 😉
      Thank you and you're welcome!

  • @friederichostertag1666
    @friederichostertag1666 3 роки тому +5

    very helpful,, thank you!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому

      Awesome! And you're welcome!

  • @user-yj3ep9pt6u
    @user-yj3ep9pt6u 5 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for the videos, I told my friends about them

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  5 місяців тому

      Thank you! Good luck on your exams!

  • @jackriley713
    @jackriley713 4 місяці тому +1

    I appreciate the video. One question. You mentioned that if oil prices decrease there will be a negative SRAS shock leading to stagnation. Wouldn’t it be the opposite? If oil prices fall wouldn’t the input cost for business go down leading to a rightward shift in the SRAS resulting in an inflationary gap?

    • @rael5333
      @rael5333 4 місяці тому +1

      correct

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  4 місяці тому

      I'll have to check and see if I mispoke. If I did, you are correct. Oil prices fall is a rightward SRAS shift, oil prices rise is a leftward SRAS shift.

  • @dolfinw4179
    @dolfinw4179 4 місяці тому +1

    I got a 5 on micro last year because of you, now coming back to get a 5 on macro! Could you elaborate what does "wages and other resource prices are sticky in the short run"?

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  4 місяці тому +1

      Awesome! Welcome back!
      Sticky is the technical term (sticky is not on the exam) for the fact that wages (and other resource prices) are slow to adjust to economic conditions like changes in the price level. While you don't need to know sticky, you need to know wages and other resource prices are fixed in the short run and flexible in the long run.
      I hope that helps!

    • @dolfinw4179
      @dolfinw4179 4 місяці тому

      @@ReviewEcon Alright thanks! One more question: does changing discount rate or reserve requirement shift the money supply just like buying and selling bonds?

  • @joosh7380
    @joosh7380 Рік тому +1

    In ReviewEcon we trust 🙏🙏🙏

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  Рік тому

      Aw! Thank you!
      Good luck with your studies!

  • @Jessicabatdorj
    @Jessicabatdorj 3 роки тому +2

    Honestly thank you so much!

  • @wahjergah4543
    @wahjergah4543 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for this--it was really helpful, but I have a quick question. If, in inflationary fiscal policy, if you were to increase government spending (increase GDP) and also decrease taxes, why would decreasing taxes (therefore getting more money in people's pockets and letting them spend more), not cancel or overpower the effect on GDP that government spending would have (especially considering that consumer spending has a higher impact on GDP than government spending does)?
    Thanks for your help!
    EDIT: Whoops, didn't think this all the way through--if you cut taxes that would increase spending and therefore increase GDP anyway. Regardless, thank you so much for your help!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому

      Remember taxes and spending are entirely separate. Governments can change one without changing the other. The difference between the two is the budget deficit (or surplus).
      Expansionary fiscal policy (used to fight unemployment and close recessionary gap) is cutting taxes and/or decreasing spending. Cutting taxes increases gross investment and consumption, increasing government spending increases government purchases. Both of those shift AD to the right.
      Good luck on your exams!

  • @allonbluvshteyn43
    @allonbluvshteyn43 4 місяці тому +1

    You said that in during an nflationary gap the LRAS shows that there is low unemployment. Using the phillip's curve we know that low unemployment means that there is high inflation. Therefore, at 11:52 in the video wouldn't aggregate demand shift left as consumption decreases due to the high inflation and thus bringing PL2 below PL1 as Y1 approaches Yf?

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  4 місяці тому

      There is less real GDP, but it's due to the leftward shift of the SRAS. Wage changes are the driving force.
      That's the self correction you need to know in the AP exam. Good luck!

    • @allonbluvshteyn43
      @allonbluvshteyn43 4 місяці тому

      @@ReviewEcon Thank you!

  • @so.phiaaa
    @so.phiaaa 3 місяці тому +1

    At 14:18, did you mean to say the during contractions, transfer payments increase because more people are unemployed not fewer?

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 місяці тому

      It's a bit hard to hear but I say fewer both times "fewer employed" during contractions and "fewer unemployed" during expansions.
      Good luck!

  • @katherinewang6230
    @katherinewang6230 3 роки тому +4

    Hi, I have a question at the end of the video where you talk about transfer payments in automatic stabilizers. it should be an increase during expansions or a decrease during expansions. I thought it would be an increase because in a recessionary gap there is higher unemployment, so more people need the unemployment compensation. Thank you!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому

      Automatic stabilizers are anything that increases the budget deficit during a contraction, and decrease the budget deficit during an expansion. Taxes automatically decrease during a recession and increase during an expansion. Transfer payments, like unemployment, increase during contractions and decrease during expansions.

    • @katherinewang6230
      @katherinewang6230 3 роки тому +1

      @@ReviewEcon Sorry... I understand the first part (Taxes), but not the transfer payments. What increase is the amount of money that the person received or ..... ?

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому

      Transfer payments are payments to citizens from the government, like social security, disability, welfare payment, and unemployment compensation. Welfare payments and unemployment compensation are automatic stabilizers. When we have a recession, more people are unemployed and more people qualify for public assistance. As a result, the government spends more money providing welfare payments and unemployment compensation during recessions.

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому

      So more people getting paid from the government when there is a recession means more total money spent automatically.

    • @katherinewang6230
      @katherinewang6230 3 роки тому

      Got it. so it means that the government spent more during the recession gap (increasing its payments), but would that mean there should be an increase during expansions (your notes said decrease during expansions)? because expansion policy is used to fix the recession gap. Thank you for much for helping me, hope that won't bother you and my questions may seem stupid.

  • @kimiisun0
    @kimiisun0 3 роки тому +2

    Super helpful!!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому

      Awesome! I'm glad you found it helpful!

  • @andrewsuh1019
    @andrewsuh1019 4 місяці тому

    Hi, I have a question. For a negative supply shock, wouldn't that be caused by an increase in oil prices as it makes producing more expensive?

    • @rael5333
      @rael5333 4 місяці тому +1

      correct

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  4 місяці тому

      I'll have to check and see if I mispoke. If I did, you are correct. Oil prices fall is a rightward SRAS shift, oil prices rise is a leftward SRAS shift.

  • @akhilkaturi7937
    @akhilkaturi7937 3 роки тому +4

    You made a mistake. When you gave examples about Positive SRAS shocks and Negative SRAS shocks, you said the examples were when there was a sudden decrease in oil prices. Which one assumes an increase in oil prices and which one assumes a decrease? Somewhere around 10:57

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому +1

      Good catch! I'll have to fix that and upload a new version (might take a bit though). It should be an increase in oil prices cause a negative SRAS shock (leftward shift) and a decrease in oil prices cause a positive SRAS shock (rightward shift).
      Thank you!

    • @akhilkaturi7937
      @akhilkaturi7937 3 роки тому +1

      @@ReviewEcon Awesome thanks! Great video though keep up the good work!

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому +4

      It will be a bit before I have time to re-record, so I edited my error out. Somewhat awkward cut, but at least I won't lead students astray.
      Thanks again!

  • @roombaoffline
    @roombaoffline 4 місяці тому +5

    who up cramming

  • @louis7428
    @louis7428 Рік тому +1

    11:53 Do wages rise as in, "real" wages? How/Why do they rise?

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  Рік тому

      It's actually nominal wages that rise (real may or may not rise depending on how much inflation there is when SRAS shifts left).
      They rise because people are being overworked when we have an inflationary gap. Workers without jobs are few and employers are having a tough time finding workers. Workers therefore have power to demand higher wages for their extra work and those higher wages cause the leftward shift of the short run aggregate supply curve.

  • @anniezhang347
    @anniezhang347 Рік тому +1

    can you explain again why the tax multiplier is one less than the spending multiplier? 3:34 because isn't some of the money saved with the spending multiplier too, like when you saved .2 of your new 1000?

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  Рік тому

      Yes!
      When the government spends $1000, all of that spending is immediately counted in GDP (government purchases). When the government reduces taxes by $1000, that tax reduction is not immediately counted in GDP because there was no immediate spending.
      The first spending with a tax decrease will be by consumers minus any savings (with an MPC of .8 it would be $800). That same amount is the second round of spending with an increase in government spending. As a result tax decreases have a smaller multiplier than spending increases (by a factor of 1).
      On the AP macro exam, the rubrics explain it as something like "when taxes are decreased, some of the decrease is saved rather than spent."

  • @NazlıÜstündağ-r1y
    @NazlıÜstündağ-r1y 5 місяців тому +1

    is SRAS and LRAS same as IS and LM curves?

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  5 місяців тому

      They are not. IS/LM is a different model and one that is not covered by the AP Macro exam or CLEP macro exam (the focus of this channel).
      There are a lot of videos about IS/LM on UA-cam though. Here is one of them ua-cam.com/video/7OXZnEGHV5I/v-deo.htmlsi=GITuGahpkhWF6osm
      Good luck!

  • @MorbidGalaxy
    @MorbidGalaxy 6 місяців тому +1

    Thank you ❤

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  6 місяців тому

      You're very welcome!

  • @genericuser-1
    @genericuser-1 2 роки тому +1

    Good man

  • @spooky4359
    @spooky4359 7 місяців тому +1

    I love you

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  7 місяців тому

      Aw! That's so sweet., but Economics is already my Valentine. 😅

  • @zacharyalterman5373
    @zacharyalterman5373 3 роки тому +1

    goat

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  3 роки тому +1

      That is very kind. Thank you!
      Good luck on your exams!

  • @user-yj3ep9pt6u
    @user-yj3ep9pt6u 5 місяців тому +1

    You should make UA-cam shorts, my attention span is so bad

    • @ReviewEcon
      @ReviewEcon  5 місяців тому

      I may at some point. 😄

  • @harryzhang-ow9hl
    @harryzhang-ow9hl 6 місяців тому +1

    let's cooooooook!!!!!