B-2s Taxi & Take Off From RAF Fairford

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,6 тис.

  • @SpeedToTheWest
    @SpeedToTheWest  3 роки тому +77

    04:22
    There's your timestamp for the take offs, you can stop moaning about the taxiing now!

    • @michellegarry1872
      @michellegarry1872 3 роки тому +6

      No moaning here, I love just looking at them sitting there waiting. Thanks for this reminder of what America used to be. May she RIP. 😢

    • @weefek
      @weefek 3 роки тому +3

      by 04:22 you actually mean 5:15

    • @deejayimm
      @deejayimm 2 роки тому

      You literally put notations in the timeline so that people can skip it if they want and people are still bitching???
      idiots.

    • @lawrencelenerd3988
      @lawrencelenerd3988 2 роки тому

      MoAn, BoO, HISS!

    • @MrRydoone
      @MrRydoone 2 роки тому

      It's looked awesome and they say stealth unbeatable..but got shot down by ancient anti air craft s125 lol..

  • @ClockCutter
    @ClockCutter 5 років тому +147

    That silhouette. Wow. And then the plane becomes a thin little wing you can hardly see a few seconds later. Really striking.

    • @marshamoore8385
      @marshamoore8385 3 роки тому +6

      Really hard to see even on the ground. And I didn't see the afterburners! If there were any.

    • @martindavidson6259
      @martindavidson6259 3 роки тому +1

      Aka XX I airbornemE ICAiR s

    • @Kevhoe
      @Kevhoe 2 роки тому +3

      @@marshamoore8385 B-2’s don’t have afterburners

    • @marshamoore8385
      @marshamoore8385 2 роки тому

      @@Kevhoe We used to have them at Fairchild AFB. But never noticed if they did or not!

    • @danielwalmsley1824
      @danielwalmsley1824 2 роки тому +3

      @@marshamoore8385 It wouldn’t have afterburners. Burns too much fuel. The B-2s thing is to go high, go far, and do so without being detected. It’s already capable of high subsonic speeds. Afterburners aren’t really necessary unless it wants to go supersonic, which is pointless for its mission.

  • @titan133760
    @titan133760 6 років тому +197

    Even today, it looks like something straight from the future

    • @lintelle2382
      @lintelle2382 3 роки тому

      or from the past if you ever watched War of the Worlds when you were a kid...

    • @monode953
      @monode953 3 роки тому +1

      I was getting 90's nostalgia!

    • @94XJ
      @94XJ 3 роки тому +1

      Wait till we get to see the B21!

    • @chillout1109
      @chillout1109 3 роки тому

      @@94XJ It won't be much different to the B-2, visually.

    • @tonytran4857
      @tonytran4857 3 роки тому

      This is the future Jet and this B-2 can cast about 200 million

  • @Deadman3913
    @Deadman3913 Рік тому +9

    Always impressed by how difficult it is to spot a B-2. Even when they’re parked on the ground!

  • @napmcdan3437
    @napmcdan3437 4 роки тому +30

    The 100th time you see this beaut is no less breathtaking than the 1st.

  • @tobes6705
    @tobes6705 5 років тому +15

    Still one of the most beautiful pieces of engineering...30 years later.

    • @ahamadisamaelhssanali1704
      @ahamadisamaelhssanali1704 5 років тому

      WHAT? HAHAHAHAHA YOU OUTDATED RUSSIAS HYPERSONIC CAN OUTRUN THAT PIECE OF SHEET METAL

    • @tobes6705
      @tobes6705 4 роки тому +2

      I didn't say anything about speed...The B-2 is not about speed. It's about the engineering and technology. You'd never know that outdated piece of sheet metal was coming or directly overhead until it was too late.

  • @DanInBranson
    @DanInBranson 5 років тому +19

    I live in Kansas City and I love seeing these things fly over. Always amazed every time at them.

    • @alexroberts4460
      @alexroberts4460 5 років тому

      UofMichFan Wings Over Whiteman is a great show....mid June I believe

  • @JWRay-xh9wl
    @JWRay-xh9wl 4 роки тому +4

    When they first had it at an airshow in Fort Lauderdale,they parked it at Ft.Lauderdale International and allowed the public close access to it.
    The size alone was intimidating,you could stand under this craft and still not be able to reach the bottom of it.
    It's a huge black bat of badness I'll never forget being that close to it,and when it flew by us at the show,everybody on the beach got silent watching it come.
    It's hard to Guage it's size until it's on you and then it's just indescribable seeing it right there going by.
    The crowd went just crazy when it passed by,it just looks like it isn't possible that what we were seeing was real kind of feeling,and true WTF,THAT'S AWESOME!

  • @slbrick56
    @slbrick56 3 роки тому +17

    I wish that my father was still alive to watch this video. He was on the engineering team involved in design and eventually did some post incident investigations at Edwards AFB during the test phases. He was quite proud of his part in creating this airplane.... Almost as much as the pride he felt working on the control systems of the A10.

    • @lstruggy
      @lstruggy 3 роки тому

      RIP to pops 🙏🏽 did he get a royalty check from being part of creating this machine?

  • @p00py51
    @p00py51 3 роки тому +13

    To think this design was proposed in the 1940's, and even flown in that time period shows how ahead of their time Northrop was.

  • @thomasblue6064
    @thomasblue6064 4 роки тому +6

    About six years ago I was sky watching one night and I saw an aircraft approaching from a distance. It had 3 lights position in the shape of a triangle as it passed over head it didn't make a sound. This aircraft has some abilities that are advanced. Shalom

  • @deltabravo1257
    @deltabravo1257 5 років тому +16

    Awesome hearing the engines throttle up and down as they prepped for taxi, etc.

  • @Tiafain
    @Tiafain 9 років тому +1448

    No wonder people throught they saw UFOs in the 70ies and 80ies O.o

    • @dragonbutt
      @dragonbutt 9 років тому +23

      +Tiafain If it was an aircraft they'd definitely hear it too :p

    • @MultiSteini
      @MultiSteini 9 років тому +9

      +Tiafain today Ufo claims are everywhere.

    • @K6III450MHZ
      @K6III450MHZ 9 років тому

      +Tiafain For Real

    • @ephyraband
      @ephyraband 7 років тому +3

      Cat

    • @georgiepeorgie3315
      @georgiepeorgie3315 7 років тому +5

      Northrop stole a Horton........................lol

  • @owenevans83
    @owenevans83 10 років тому +365

    An amazing aircraft, it looks out-of-this-world!

    • @inekemateman273
      @inekemateman273 7 років тому +15

      ~In fact,....it is!

    • @alexbarton5771
      @alexbarton5771 7 років тому +1

      Owen Evans beautiful it is but it's got nothing on the B1-B or the F117

    • @cod6guy12
      @cod6guy12 7 років тому +4

      The F117 is a piece of junk and the B1-B fits a completely different role, not even comparable

    • @303storm
      @303storm 7 років тому +8

      actually it contains alien technology from reverse engineered parts. our daily fiber optics are coming from the same source, just to name one.

    • @robertchutney
      @robertchutney 7 років тому +5

      It is Hitler's flying wing copycat from WW2! But today it's spraying democracy all around the world...

  • @eastsider85
    @eastsider85 5 років тому +20

    If a b-2 pilot/co pilot ever reads this,i just want you to know,you are f**king badass for being able to flying this beast

  • @thaintriguing1
    @thaintriguing1 4 роки тому +186

    Brought to you by the alien technology at Area 51

    • @adamwarlock5286
      @adamwarlock5286 3 роки тому +5

      The B2 is over 30 years old .

    • @Stewpadaso4661
      @Stewpadaso4661 3 роки тому +3

      Exactly

    • @ikosicat9418
      @ikosicat9418 3 роки тому +1

      B2 Is Made By NASA And Usa

    • @JustJohn505
      @JustJohn505 3 роки тому +10

      Area 51 is not scary, whats scares me is what lays behind those giant hangar doors in the Lockheed Martin skunk works building

    • @jeffwebster402
      @jeffwebster402 3 роки тому +2

      Radar cross section less than that of a bluejay

  • @davidarchuleta8067
    @davidarchuleta8067 5 років тому +553

    Even though it's 2019, it's still unusual to see plane shape like that.

    • @TonyEnglandUK
      @TonyEnglandUK 5 років тому +11

      After reading the news of the USA's role in the Falklands War, it's an outrage that American military is allowed on any British soil.

    • @hoodaticus
      @hoodaticus 5 років тому +12

      That's because they're nearly impossible for a human to fly and are basically computer controlled.

    • @joeyjamison5772
      @joeyjamison5772 5 років тому +49

      @@TonyEnglandUK Why not? You let everybody else in.

    • @TonyEnglandUK
      @TonyEnglandUK 5 років тому +5

      ​@@joeyjamison5772 Alexander Haig and Ronald Reagan discussed _"passing on to Argentina British military details of the invasion of South Georgia"._ Your own Washington Post and Wall Street Journal will show you proof if you doubt it _"How the United States Almost Betrayed Britain in the Falklands War"._ And you Americans complain about Muslims betraying Britain?

    • @markt857
      @markt857 5 років тому +29

      @@TonyEnglandUK Another conspiracy theory. That never happened. We gave satellite intelligence to Britain during the whole thing.

  • @HELLH0WND
    @HELLH0WND 7 років тому +22

    The really interesting thing is that these planes are probably equivalent to what the Wright Brothers flew compared to what they have now. It sure would be fun to see what they have hidden in some hanger somewhere.

    • @macbeavers6938
      @macbeavers6938 5 років тому

      Good point. Through backward engineering and direct E. T. contact we already have craft that can take us to the stars. Problem is the E. T.s have us under quarantine because of humans' violent nature. Nuclear detonations can cause inter dimensional damage in time/space Dr. Steven Greer has pointed this out for decades.

    • @cesar_onada
      @cesar_onada 9 місяців тому

      @@macbeavers6938 Hahahahaha! 🤪

  • @davidjennings127
    @davidjennings127 5 років тому +82

    That's one bad ass piece of equipment.

    • @ricardoabait1864
      @ricardoabait1864 3 роки тому

      D&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&:::::::&::&:::&&&&&&&&

    • @kevinsnell3205
      @kevinsnell3205 3 роки тому

      Just don’t let Biden get his hands on it It will end up with the Taliban

  • @ikshields
    @ikshields 3 роки тому +2

    Alien and beautiful. And there's no spookier icon in the air than that silhouette.

  • @ytubepuppy
    @ytubepuppy 3 роки тому +5

    I live close to a B2 base and see them fly over quite often. Beautiful aircraft.

    • @loisjohnson7272
      @loisjohnson7272 3 роки тому +1

      lucky you , I love watching fantastic air planes ✈️ take off and landing.

    • @JohnMcDonald-ef5gz
      @JohnMcDonald-ef5gz 3 місяці тому

      @ytubepuppy The only thing I ever get to see is the occasional C17 or once and a great while a C3A. MacGuire AFB is about forty minutes southwest of me.

  • @kathleenbergeron1292
    @kathleenbergeron1292 4 роки тому +8

    When I was in grade school, back in the 50s, in Austin, I saw a “flying wing” while I was in recess. I believe the designation was B-49.

  • @steveindorset
    @steveindorset 4 роки тому +21

    What a thing of beauty those B2 bombers are!

    • @fdfsdfsvsfgsg4888
      @fdfsdfsvsfgsg4888 3 роки тому +2

      Easy for you to say. You never had one bearing down your home to kill your innocent kids. But hey, go USA? Idiot.

    • @___-tp1su
      @___-tp1su 3 роки тому

      @@fdfsdfsvsfgsg4888 I don't think the b2 was used for that. Too expensive and they don't need stealth for such a use

    • @JustJohn505
      @JustJohn505 3 роки тому

      @@fdfsdfsvsfgsg4888 cry more dude

    • @jeremychicken3339
      @jeremychicken3339 3 роки тому

      @@fdfsdfsvsfgsg4888 communist shitstain

  • @Jimthefurryworm
    @Jimthefurryworm 5 років тому +8

    I was stationed at Fairford air force base in England for a few years... the coltswolds are beautiful, plus also close to Stonehenge..1994 to 1998

    • @stacydavis7472
      @stacydavis7472 5 років тому +2

      Thank you for your service.

    • @MrDaiseymay
      @MrDaiseymay 5 років тому

      How poetic, thanks for the insiders view. You are never more than 70 miles from the sea, in Britain, when stood in the middle. But there's a hell of a lot of things to see.

  • @jerrytegen140
    @jerrytegen140 5 років тому +1

    Was stationed at Whiteman AFB from 1959 till 1962. We had B-47's then on which I was an Assistant Crew Chief. We pulled "reflex" at RAF Fairford also. The place does not look the same. Thanks

  • @rogeru73
    @rogeru73 4 роки тому +3

    Wow! 3 take offs here.
    2 of the old B2`s and one of the new generation.
    Fantastic :-)

  • @garrittpwl
    @garrittpwl 5 років тому +3

    Saw one of these fly over the Indy 500 starting ceremonies about 10 years ago. It was the craziest thing ever. Just a silent line in the sky, then she quietly slipped over us and banked high to the side at full throttle rocking the grand stands and the 250,000 people in them. 2nd best fly over I've ever seen. #USA

    • @marekgregory4512
      @marekgregory4512 4 роки тому

      The first being which?

    • @garrittpwl
      @garrittpwl 4 роки тому

      ​@@marekgregory4512 Indy 2019, Casual fly over with f-16 and A10, looked low, slow and boring. After they passed over the stands and exited the area, the f-16 comes ripping back into the infield at a 90 degree to the front stretch at what had to be 500 agl, banked it hard and pulled enough g forces to pull condensation across the wings, before he got to the end of the front stretch he pointed it at the sky and burned the afterburner until at least 10k feet. If I were a General Dynamics investor, I'd have been sold.

  • @NikkkitoNippongo
    @NikkkitoNippongo 10 років тому +23

    This technology marvel is made in my hometown of Palmdale/Lancaster, California, USA....VERY PROUD!

    • @andrewmcilveen4917
      @andrewmcilveen4917 9 років тому

      NikkkitoNippongo If the Boeing and Lockheed get there way, which they probably will, then the LRS-B will be being made there to.

    • @ednuttah
      @ednuttah 9 років тому +1

      NikkkitoNippongo Employing local residence and local students on apprentice programmes, ensuring the next generation not only benefit but provide future resources and tax dollars? Or just luring other people from around the US to move there and overpower your economy? Just a thought.

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 8 років тому

      NikkkitoNippongo
      This technology marvel is made in my hometown of Palmdale/Lancaster, California, USA....VERY PROUD!
      '
      B-2 was flying over the rose parade in pasadena before

    • @suskaklapp6641
      @suskaklapp6641 4 роки тому

      @@ednuttah could they not of come up with a better way to spend our money.

  • @michael_mouse
    @michael_mouse 4 роки тому +9

    ... the B-2 doesn't so much take off... as float away!... a beautiful bird

  • @thedodgeman01
    @thedodgeman01 5 років тому +2

    That plane has a ridiculously slim profile! So glad that is on our side!

  • @kda3113
    @kda3113 4 роки тому +70

    Fun fact: one of the chief engineers of this plane is currently imprisoned at ADX Florence for selling classified information to the Chinese.

  • @siegmars.450
    @siegmars.450 5 років тому +18

    Oh, a flying geometry set square 🙂
    The sign at 05:40 doesn‘t match 😝

  • @respectedgentleman4322
    @respectedgentleman4322 5 років тому +117

    Pause at 5:35, looks like pixels in the middle of the screen are missing

  • @richardjoganah1871
    @richardjoganah1871 7 років тому +12

    Amazing video ,the lovely b2 is my favorite usaf airforce aircraft off all time 😊

  • @geoffreydowen5793
    @geoffreydowen5793 2 роки тому +1

    UFO! a thing of pure beauty nice post sir, appreciated the tower comms' I'm a Royal Navy vet and I can appreciate this bloody lovely! Nov 22

  • @jimfowler5930
    @jimfowler5930 5 років тому +2

    Nice video STTW! What a progression by the pilot: DA-20 at PQ, the T-6A Texan II at Undergraduate Pilot Training, and then the T-38 at advanced (jet pipeline), and now the B-2- good work, sir! God Bless America! (and England for being our ally)

  • @Peppermint1
    @Peppermint1 7 років тому +59

    Smart design. Imagine the enemy watching this: Oh wow, what an amazing airplane, never seen something like this before, lets take pictures

  • @kenlompart9905
    @kenlompart9905 3 роки тому +22

    I can remember when the stealth was still in it's test phase and top secret, 60 minutes was the first to be granted a look at it but of course very little could be told to the public about it's functions other than it's speed and ability to evade radar. It wasn't until the gulf war that the world witnessed the destruction it was capable of.

    • @alexiskiri9693
      @alexiskiri9693 Рік тому +1

      I remember when it was still top secret and people were claiming that UFO's were flying all over the place. 😂

  • @melshorse
    @melshorse 4 роки тому +20

    Thank you and RIP to MR. Jack Northrop for his ageless flying wing concept.

    • @detlefalle2385
      @detlefalle2385 4 роки тому +2

      @Joe Kinchicken agree on the Horten part. They where first with this design. Von Braun's alternative was going with the Soviets to the Soviet Union. Can't blame him for choosing the US instead...

    • @thebanfflocal2366
      @thebanfflocal2366 3 роки тому +2

      The Nazis came up with it first.

    • @andso7719
      @andso7719 3 роки тому +1

      @@thebanfflocal2366 Little man, Jack was working on this in 1929.

    • @loutonacca5919
      @loutonacca5919 3 роки тому

      @@andso7719 in your dreams. The USA is what it’s today thanks to the German scientists.

    • @andso7719
      @andso7719 3 роки тому

      @@loutonacca5919 I mean... it's quite literally a fact. There are photos of his flying concept long before the Horton Ho.

  • @tlhoward5655
    @tlhoward5655 5 років тому

    Was on a golf course in North. CA many years ago. Had just teed up the ball when I realized a great shadow was creeping over. Saw the face of my golfing partner who was standing about ten yds away facing me. His mouth was agape and he was transfixed on something up above. I looked up and flying rather low overhead was this magnificent yet ominous looking black machine, NO NOISE at all. It was an awesome sight. The B-2 must have been flying out of Travis AFB in Fairfield, CA.

  • @RufusVonDufus2
    @RufusVonDufus2 5 років тому +2

    Really enjoyed all of the taxiing. Really smooth.

  • @BaybieK
    @BaybieK 10 років тому +190

    With your camerawork and my Bose noise cancelling headphones, I might as well have been there.
    Honestly Mate your Camerawork is exceptional!!

  • @paulmoore4223
    @paulmoore4223 5 років тому +26

    Makes you wonder what secret things we have now. Beautiful engineering

    • @docholiday4004
      @docholiday4004 5 років тому

      Nothing trumps president 🇷🇺 knows

    • @LordPotato690
      @LordPotato690 3 роки тому

      @M Taylor A harrier? A VTOL is not new the only thing about the f-35 is that its stealth

  • @TridentCapital
    @TridentCapital 6 років тому +8

    Not a lot of runway to spare on those takeoffs.....great camera work. Thanks for sharing.

  • @metalmike5141
    @metalmike5141 5 років тому +2

    Awesome video thank you. I've lived next to Kirkland AFB in ABQ,NM across the pond and have seen and heard some interesting things my favorite was watching the base ground all air traffic due to a very large storm and watching an f/a 18 struggle to land due to turbulence. Our boys sure can fly

  • @janetslicer3637
    @janetslicer3637 2 роки тому +1

    Oh, I just love this beast! My all-time favorite!

  • @tunesmith2012
    @tunesmith2012 3 роки тому +8

    In 1986 I was an engineer with the B2 program. This plane is invisible to radar. It gives off a signal the size of a crow. I cant say anymore

  • @susanspurling4826
    @susanspurling4826 4 роки тому +3

    Great video, we were watching that day.

  • @jimmiegiboney2473
    @jimmiegiboney2473 Рік тому +1

    31K Thumbs Up + Mine! You're welcome! Thanks! 😊
    Notes: This century and this millennium have only existed since 2001. So I'm more impressed that the technology predates those two time periods! 😎
    (Year 2000 is the last year of Century 20 and Millennium 2! It gives each their names!)
    With all of that grass and the nearby woods, no wonder the birds feel free to live there despite the fumes and noise!
    Who does the mowing, if any? Do they check for wildlife homes first? They would want to be careful that the blades don't sling or fling anything at the expensive airplanes!
    Congratulations on having such an experience! 🎉🎊 I miss going to airshows, but I don't miss the heat.

  • @roberthill7335
    @roberthill7335 2 роки тому

    I still can't believe I was blessed to work on these birds, from November 8 8to November 99.

  • @Litoralecia
    @Litoralecia 5 років тому +13

    *_Sou apaixonado pela força aérea e acho o bombardeiro B2 Spirit, simplesmente FANTÁSTICO!!!. 👏👏👏_*

  • @johnvictorengland7703
    @johnvictorengland7703 5 років тому +7

    Why is that everything that causes death, destruction and mayhem looks so awesome? It can be giant gunships like the Bismarck, a nuclear submarine, a B-2, a tank etc. These things fascinate me to no end.

    • @DarkMatterX1
      @DarkMatterX1 5 років тому +1

      Because no matter how intelligent we claim to be, no matter how much we evolve, at the heart of man is the innate desire for conflict and conquest. It is what has driven us to war, and also to the stars. These machines feed our most primal desires.

    • @FRITZI999
      @FRITZI999 5 років тому

      cause logic Devices are always beautiful ... War Machines are made for - killing. It´s their LOGIC purpose

    • @jimjoebar
      @jimjoebar 5 років тому

      It causes deterrence my friend …. that is until some dictator gets too big for his britches. Peace through Strength.

    • @ikshields
      @ikshields 3 роки тому

      Our primal admiration of predators lives on, even as it gives us the willies.

  • @Cynsham
    @Cynsham 2 роки тому +3

    The B-2 is the closest thing I've ever seen that truly looks reminiscent of the old "UFO sightings"

  • @andiehammettz4u265
    @andiehammettz4u265 3 роки тому

    Knew something universally familiar and outstanding was transpiring there. 💯

  • @Mauser_.
    @Mauser_. 4 роки тому +4

    Perfect video!! Thank you very much. That runway is scary short LOL

    • @nickray9102
      @nickray9102 4 роки тому

      Its one of the longest runways in the air force, pilots do touch and go training whenever they pass whiteman

  • @NxDoyle
    @NxDoyle 5 років тому +107

    It blows my mind that this thing can go nearly 7000 miles on a tank of fuel.

    • @nick4819
      @nick4819 5 років тому +48

      Basically both entire wings are giant fuel tanks. What's amazing is how the wings can hold all of that fuel and not snap off. Each wing holds roughly 84,000lbs of fuel...yet it doesn't snap while just sitting on the ground. In the air..the lift helps relieve some of the stress..but while turning or gaining altitude..those wings are holding all of that fuel..plus the weight of the center of the plane..plus the multiplier of G forces. Absolutely amazing engineering.

    • @jamesmorgan403
      @jamesmorgan403 5 років тому +5

      @@nick4819 Oh go fuck yourself, the A380 carries 200 times that fuel in its wings and banks better while carrying 600 passengers. Psss.. it also has a better climb rate... don't believe go check it.

    • @wdwerker
      @wdwerker 5 років тому +28

      The 380 shows up on radar thus making a great target with all that fuel !

    • @nick4819
      @nick4819 5 років тому +29

      @James Morgan ahhh yes the stealthy a380. That extra 100' wingspan on the a380 helps doesn't it? As well that it was designed for something completely opposite of the B2. I mean the wing of the A380 is thicker than the entire B2....1 wing is almost 3/4's the width of the B2. So please..help me figure out what we are arguing.

    • @dancingsquid6957
      @dancingsquid6957 5 років тому +23

      @@jamesmorgan403 what a stupid comment, thicko

  • @MKTElM
    @MKTElM 5 років тому +10

    My admiration goes to the designer(s) of this aircraft .

    • @rixille
      @rixille 5 років тому

      Indeed, the engineering itself is quite awesome. Its use is... well you know...

    • @rixille
      @rixille 5 років тому +1

      @@p1zd3c Yes, many things originated from Germany. It is a shame this fact is often overlooked.

    • @ytubepuppy
      @ytubepuppy 5 років тому +3

      @@p1zd3c No, it did not. Jack Northrup had our first flying wing, the N-1M flying in 1940. You people need to get over your fake history admiration for German technology and learn actual history.

    • @ytubepuppy
      @ytubepuppy 5 років тому

      @@rixille see my post above.

  • @danielhristov6175
    @danielhristov6175 4 роки тому +4

    2:00 the motorcycle sound made that moment hilarious

  • @SteveMHN
    @SteveMHN 2 роки тому +1

    I love how it becomes just a thin black line in the sky.

  • @markvonfeldt1459
    @markvonfeldt1459 2 роки тому +1

    That view in the first picture looks like a spaceship!

  • @manic4u2
    @manic4u2 5 років тому +8

    God Bless America! The rest of the free world wouldn't be so free without you.

    • @difruntanguls
      @difruntanguls 5 років тому

      You think America is bombing the shit out of sovereign nations on behalf of the American people and in the name of freedom? Libya and Syria exposed the true colours of this international order, siding with and assisting the absolute worst of extremists, in the pursuit of regime change. Be proud of your nation and your people and your forces personel, but the 'US' military machine agenda is nothing ot be proud of.

  • @KITLEVEY
    @KITLEVEY 5 років тому +74

    When we saw the B-1s we were completely impressed. When saw the B-2s we questioned which planet we were on.

    • @GAmePLAY-z4f
      @GAmePLAY-z4f 5 років тому +2

      Junk. Food for C400 Triumph.

    • @jamesmorgan403
      @jamesmorgan403 5 років тому +2

      No, we didn't. We questioned a government that was willing to spend an absurd amount of money on a useless project.

    • @SRTBOAT
      @SRTBOAT 5 років тому +7

      @@jamesmorgan403 No that's what you did. The rest of us understand that if you wanna get somewhere in life, get off your ass and go do it because buddy, government spending is not why you're stuck(if you are).

    • @darcmadr6500
      @darcmadr6500 5 років тому

      Just wait. There's stuff coming that will blow your socks off.

    • @MrDaiseymay
      @MrDaiseymay 5 років тому

      How old are you?---12?

  • @AndreiTupolev
    @AndreiTupolev 10 років тому +17

    Amazing looking & sounding things. Interesting that they deploy the elevons when they turn while taxying, maybe it's like a speed brake.

    • @paulhomsy2751
      @paulhomsy2751 7 років тому

      Ailerons, from aile in French which means wing. Aileron means small wing. Not "elevons".

    • @chzel
      @chzel 6 років тому +24

      Don't try to act smart when you have no idea...Delta wings have elevons because the elevators and ailerons are combined. Hence they are called elevons.

  • @puirYorick
    @puirYorick 4 роки тому +1

    The most modern aviation technology yet the radio communication still comes over as squawky as ever. I'm amazed they understand each other.

    • @joostdriesens3984
      @joostdriesens3984 4 роки тому

      It's because we're listening to it through a recording of a civilian receiver that picked up the communication. For the tower and the planes it is more clear.

    • @puirYorick
      @puirYorick 4 роки тому +1

      @@joostdriesens3984 In this instance, the civilian equipment aside, the sound seemed roughly typical of all such recorded conversations I've ever heard including a few made inside the cockpits of front-line jet fighters and one chap who made his own cockpit video inside a passenger jet.
      I can't reasonably argue (or readily accept) that it somehow all magically sounds less squawky in the earpieces of the two principals when there's so commonly requests to correct and re-confirm instructions from both ends. These incidents are the very reason why I made this observation in the first place.
      FWIW, an up to date "civilian" piece of kit is probably a touch more likely to be of the latest quality than something installed by government tender into a control tower or by a manufacturer into a plane five to ten years before so I set that point aside from overly harsh analysis. It doesn't seem to matter *whose* equipment is used to pick up the transmission, it sounds like rubbish.

    • @joostdriesens3984
      @joostdriesens3984 4 роки тому

      @@puirYorick I understand your explanation and you make some good points, but I'm still not entirely convinced.
      I think the recording is different compared with wearing the headset. I've been a passenger in small airplanes and a helicopter a few times wearing a headset and the sound was pretty clear.
      I have also watched a lot of ATC videos, which are basically the recordings of radio traffic and I'm always surprised by how well the pilots and ATC communicate and NOT have to correct a lot. Of course, how many corrections is 'few' or 'a lot' is somewhat a case of opinion.
      Whatever the quality, I'm am surprised, like you, that by modern day standards, it does not seem possible or convenient to transmit higher quality voice sounds with all the voice frequencies intact, so you don't have that 'radio effect'

    • @puirYorick
      @puirYorick 4 роки тому +1

      @@joostdriesens3984 Well, you arrived precisely at my original point and that's what matters. Cheers.

  • @AlexiaVon
    @AlexiaVon 5 років тому

    Hard to believe this thing came out in the 1980's. Must have blew peoples minds seen it back then. Still blows peoples minds today..

    • @tonytrovato9797
      @tonytrovato9797 5 років тому

      Back then in 70s and 80s I think this plane was top secret and was tested at area 51, not sure though. Was on some military channel I watch but it was a long time ago idk.

  • @84asrd84boxy
    @84asrd84boxy 10 років тому +8

    Excellent video, wow what an aircraft, thanks for sharing, it's a like, cheers...Bill

  • @shadyladynz08
    @shadyladynz08 5 років тому +13

    I'm impressed that you were allowed to get even that close!

  • @auracruz4629
    @auracruz4629 5 років тому +4

    What a beautiful aircraft to watch taking off..! ✈✈💯👍

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 4 роки тому

    Awesome plane... I met a tourist and her dad was involved in the design of this plane.. still classified what goes into it.. Thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿

  • @sambam1252
    @sambam1252 5 років тому +1

    Epic. Had the pleasure of seeing the f22 live in fl/ga. Could not imagine this.....🤩🤩🤩

  • @smudge_smiff9626
    @smudge_smiff9626 10 років тому +36

    Love that quote "Only stealthy when its dropping something on you"

  • @Flightsworldwidevideos
    @Flightsworldwidevideos 5 років тому +3

    Incredible aircraft!! Thanks for this video :)

  • @matthewtozier9837
    @matthewtozier9837 10 років тому +32

    The B-2 Spirit is a unique aircraft to the fact it does not have any tail wings, Another well done project to america.

    • @tveirken1
      @tveirken1 10 років тому +1

      Oh were just not mentioning the F35 then ey.... ok!

    • @matthewtozier9837
      @matthewtozier9837 10 років тому +3

      F35? What does that have to do anything with the B2 I see nothing unique about the F35, Just a big brother of the Harrier.

    • @mickymaus2104
      @mickymaus2104 10 років тому

      yes you are right man...look for horten IX or XVIII

    • @matthewtozier9837
      @matthewtozier9837 10 років тому

      mickymaus2104 Yes I have seen tons of pictures of it, It would be a war changing invention

    • @wacocuc2
      @wacocuc2 10 років тому

      Matthew Tozier
      Why'll they both are VTOL air craft, how they make it happen is quite different.

  • @darrenjones2933
    @darrenjones2933 3 роки тому

    They both used darn near every inch of that runway. Cool video!

  • @aviationenthusiastchannel3934
    @aviationenthusiastchannel3934 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing video , without music 👍

  • @nynthworld4152
    @nynthworld4152 5 років тому +40

    Nice aircraft does it come with Anti-Lock brakes and a 6-Disc CD player? I'm thinking about a 24 month lease.👍

    • @Sir_Pyrrhic
      @Sir_Pyrrhic 5 років тому +7

      I wonder how much a 24 month lease on a $2BN vehicle would be.

    • @whoeverwhoever400
      @whoeverwhoever400 5 років тому +4

      no CD player but it has bluetooth.

    • @philt5782
      @philt5782 5 років тому +1

      PCP With 8000 miles a year no problem

    • @nynthworld4152
      @nynthworld4152 5 років тому +1

      I'll need automatic transmission for the runway.👍

    • @maestro-zq8gu
      @maestro-zq8gu 5 років тому +6

      It plays constant metal music.. It can't be turned off.

  • @ronaldpurnell9255
    @ronaldpurnell9255 9 років тому +39

    Was that Tom Cruise rolling up at 1:50?

  • @michaelharris2844
    @michaelharris2844 4 роки тому +4

    I've got a splendid idea...start the video when the plane is about to take off! Genius!! 🙄🙄

  • @catfish307
    @catfish307 4 роки тому +1

    I live near Whiteman and see these from time to time. Loud.

  • @rext8949
    @rext8949 3 роки тому +1

    Looks awesome. But what are the specs ?? How good are they actually. Or are they just impressive only visually. After all we just get to see them do a pretty ordinary takeoff.

  • @davidpritchard7174
    @davidpritchard7174 4 роки тому +17

    For it's age technically a masterpiece..

    • @robbiejk9613
      @robbiejk9613 4 роки тому

      Huh? It's actually very young in the world of airframes. You must be a millenial.

    • @jorgenajera9187
      @jorgenajera9187 4 роки тому

      @@robbiejk9613 for a newbie like myself, what’s the typical age for one of these things. I love her fighters on particular but I know these things take years to engineer with a catastrophic budget

    • @billyboblillybob344
      @billyboblillybob344 3 роки тому

      @@robbiejk9613 Not really. The XB-35 flew in the 40s with very similar dimensions. Technology of avionics had to catch up in order for this aircraft to function.

    • @donaldaltman4764
      @donaldaltman4764 3 роки тому

      You mean it's old in design the flying wing has been around for awhile but I think they got it right this time !! U.S.A

  • @tinmannewheart8417
    @tinmannewheart8417 5 років тому +5

    Absolutely magnificent!

  • @ItsMoreh
    @ItsMoreh 4 роки тому +55

    5:35 when your Minecraft sky doesn’t load

  • @tundralou
    @tundralou 3 роки тому

    Wow-Majestic and easily identified as a UFO-those engines spooling up and taking all the runway for takeoff-good video-thanks

  • @jimwortham8634
    @jimwortham8634 3 роки тому

    Great video I think thanks for posting sure took a while to get going

  • @cloud_c5222
    @cloud_c5222 4 роки тому +5

    Even the birds at 4:24 stopped to admire the plane taking off

  • @DavidSmith-ze2wi
    @DavidSmith-ze2wi 4 роки тому +4

    Awesome aircraft all credit to the designers, the people who built it and the aircrew who fly them.

  • @anitapraass6804
    @anitapraass6804 4 роки тому +3

    Is that not a stealth??

    • @wmd40
      @wmd40 Місяць тому

      huh?? all b2 bombers are stealth. they're still loud. that's not the point. the point is to be invisible to radar or other forms of electronic detection.

  • @bakersgaming3591
    @bakersgaming3591 5 років тому +1

    Flew over 5 of these parked up near an airport in Hawaii, wasnt lucky enough to see them in flight but my girlfriend seen 3 of them take off and fly along Waikiki beachfront, was so jealous

  • @ВладимирБарашкин-п8м

    Спасибо за материал!!! Сколько оно пролетит с брошенной ручкой, с выключенной автоматикой управления???

  • @xtrixgamer6392
    @xtrixgamer6392 9 років тому +9

    Saw one of these pass directly over me when I was in my United Kingdom garden. Very quiet at 20 thousand feet, well that's what it looked like

    • @joshuametcalfe5475
      @joshuametcalfe5475 7 років тому

      XtrixGamer it isn't supposed to be loud

    • @jdanon203
      @jdanon203 6 років тому +1

      Designed to be stealthy from an RF, acoustic, and thermal perspective. Despite being built in the 70s, they really did consider everything in the design.

    • @titan133760
      @titan133760 6 років тому +1

      @@jdanon203 Not to mention making a flying wing design actually work

  • @PYakMan1
    @PYakMan1 10 років тому +179

    Ppl still wonder WHY they see big triangles flying in the sky and call them UFOs. Very menacing.

    • @jpatt1000
      @jpatt1000 10 років тому +6

      There was one that did a flyby at EAA about four years ago. (I had forgotten that it was going to be here.) I was out at my parents house south of the runway on it's first pass. I heard it go by so I ran around the garage (as I always do that time of year) only to see a giant.....squid!? I caught my first sight at a rear three quarter view while it was banking and it took a full five seconds before my brain caught up and I realized what I was seeing because it looked so alien from the angle I was viewing it at. (A flying squid was the first thing my brain told me I was seeing). So, yeah I have to agree!

    • @goldenmanuever1176
      @goldenmanuever1176 10 років тому +5

      aerospace reverse enginering at its finest.

    • @PYakMan1
      @PYakMan1 10 років тому +1

      Johnny Wadd
      Nothing reverse engineered about it, Nazi were flying these during WW2, one in a museum.

    • @warfossil
      @warfossil 10 років тому +6

      PYakMan1 Wrong.

    • @PYakMan1
      @PYakMan1 10 років тому

      warfossil
      Nazi didn't have a "Flying Wing" aircraft in WW2? Is THAT your answer?
      As YOU are WRONG. Seen it.
      Horton Ho-2 that was in 1935, by 1945 had advanced versions with Jets/Rockets, hate ppl who say I'm wrong, when THEY are WRONG! Idiots!

  • @canuckloyalist4681
    @canuckloyalist4681 5 років тому +5

    Jack would be oh so proud! They do seem to use their fair share of runway though!!

    • @jimjoebar
      @jimjoebar 5 років тому

      Jack was briefed on it shortly before he passed away. It carries a lot of fuel, especially going across a pond.

  • @davee8659
    @davee8659 5 років тому

    Looks like the runway was tailor made for those birds. Not a whole lot left on rotate (though doubtless they could have expedited). Awesome vid and thanks! Cheers - Dave (Aus)

  • @mr.beachwalker7154
    @mr.beachwalker7154 2 роки тому

    amazing that it can fly, looks unreal. what is even more mind blowing is that it was designed and built in the 80 and cost 1 billion dollars each. Imagine what he USAF has now 40 or so years later.

  • @balancedactguy
    @balancedactguy 4 роки тому +9

    And a BARGAIN at just $1 BILLION apiece!! I personally am still in love with the SR-71 though!

    • @rv_316
      @rv_316 4 роки тому +2

      Mark Bondar what happened to that sr71.... Lockheed Martin...the original black bird...!!??

    • @andyfletcher3561
      @andyfletcher3561 4 роки тому +1

      @@rv_316 They "retired" it in the 80's, brought it back a year later for NASA to do some "high altitude testing", then found in the Middle East the satellites weren't able to replace it fully and put it back to work. Not sure what it's status is now. I can tell you for a fact they were still maintaining, modding, and flying it out of USAF Plant 42 as late as April 2001.

  • @junkyarddog9799
    @junkyarddog9799 5 років тому +10

    It literally disappears after liftoff..amazing if a little freaky.

  • @wacocuc2
    @wacocuc2 9 років тому +37

    The concept of a flying wing has be around and played with for many years, before, during and after WWII. Jack Northrup was the most successful with the B-35 (piston power) and the B-49 (jet power). The B-49 was actually IN PRODUCTION and 15 were near completion when the project was cancelled. The reason is still not completely known. Politics is widely suspected. His company, Northrup, was the prime builder of the B-2. In fact, Jack lived long enough to be brought, in his wheel chair, to the corporate offices and shown a model of the B-2 before the public release. His comment was, "Now I know why God has let me live this long". The basic configuration of the B-2, wing angle, etc. all came from Jack's research. The USA is the ONLY country to EVER put a flying wing into PRODUCTION. Prototypes are one thing, production and actual use is quite another.

    • @DatabaseJanitor
      @DatabaseJanitor 9 років тому +4

      wacocuc2 The fatal flaw was that the B-49 could not recover from a stall. At the stall it would pitch down and tumble, and there was no way to stop it.

    • @ogdocvato
      @ogdocvato 7 років тому +4

      Timothy Fox Thank you for that historical brief.

    • @darkleader5962
      @darkleader5962 7 років тому

      wacocuc2 They maybe but judging from the missus of capital letters the US don't have the best grammar and spelling record

    • @triumphrider9796
      @triumphrider9796 7 років тому +1

      Nor do you, "missus". His use of capitals is perfectly correct, as one use is for EMPHASIS. He did misspell "Northrop" though.

    • @jdanon203
      @jdanon203 7 років тому +1

      One of the key components of the B-2 is the computers that are actually keeping it in the air. That piece is often overlooked in these fights over who came up with the idea first. Without American technology added to the "flying wing" it would never be more than a concept plane regardless of who originally conceived the shape of the aircraft.

  • @bnsf88
    @bnsf88 2 роки тому

    Brings a tear to my eye. Such power

  • @melindavaughn3496
    @melindavaughn3496 4 роки тому +1

    OMG I love that plane, thanks guys!!!!