More than the 16th and 17th centuries, due to the type of heraldry of the nations, walls, architecture, weapons and clothing, it seems more like the 15th century until the first decades of the 16th century at the latest; however, it looks interesting as RTS.
That doesn’t really make sense, mount and blade is an RTS-RPG, while this is a grand strategy game. Could M&B2 be better then it currently is, absolutely, but it would never be this because they’re different games in different genres.
More than the 16th and 17th centuries, due to the type of heraldry of the nations, walls, architecture, weapons and clothing, it seems more like the 15th century until the first decades of the 16th century at the latest; however, it looks interesting as RTS.
Total war mount and blade! YES PLEASE!
This game look a lot better than AOE4
nice, a real RTS !!!
Looks fun!
Otro juego de Historia
This looks what Mount and Blade didn't accomplish in 16 years lol
What do you mean by that? How?
That doesn’t really make sense, mount and blade is an RTS-RPG, while this is a grand strategy game. Could M&B2 be better then it currently is, absolutely, but it would never be this because they’re different games in different genres.
They lost me at "Directly manage every peasant." Damn communist econmony is easy AF just as is unreal and therefore boring.
another mobile game
this just total war but ok
you have down syndrome
@@illplaywithfirewhy
more like age of empire and stronghold