The Difference Principle illustrated

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
  • A very simple example, illustrating the Difference Principle. Screencast by Toby Handfield

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @jonathandowning1828
    @jonathandowning1828 Рік тому +1

    This is the first time I've understood this properly! Thank you!

  • @johnharvey1428
    @johnharvey1428 5 років тому +9

    Scratching my head reading Rawls, then watch this video and it’s clear!! Thank you 🙏

  • @vlad_o_sh
    @vlad_o_sh 4 роки тому +10

    Thanks for the informative video. If I could add something to the understanding of the Difference Principle: One should also consider a situation, where the less privileged get a little more of the shared goods while all the other loose a substantial part of those goods. This would, for Rawls, still be a more just situation.

    • @dillonwatt6732
      @dillonwatt6732 4 роки тому

      question for you (you seem smart) in the difference principle what is being distributed is it money??

    • @lunacatt
      @lunacatt 2 роки тому +1

      That is incorrect because if the "all others" suffered a "substantial loss", the "all others" will become (or is actually) the disadvantaged group (in the unequal distribution).

  • @tomvose8159
    @tomvose8159 7 років тому +1

    Best video I've seen explaining this! Thanks so much

  • @madarovidius1775
    @madarovidius1775 8 років тому +2

    very well ilustrated, thank you!

  • @BombAdvice
    @BombAdvice 7 років тому +1

    Good job! Thanks for putting it in terms I can understand!

  • @AdityaKumar-zk6xv
    @AdityaKumar-zk6xv 3 роки тому

    Amazing 👏 explanation

  • @adrianaaguillen
    @adrianaaguillen 9 років тому +2

    easy to understand! THANK YOU

  • @estesgaming9851
    @estesgaming9851 5 років тому

    im so confuse so it does mean that this principles are merely focuses to the less privileges ?

  • @Nemanoid
    @Nemanoid 6 років тому +1

    but why can we say that if everyone is equal, the distribution would be so low? It would be distributed proportionally and so it is higher, no?

    • @joecherfan2547
      @joecherfan2547 6 років тому +2

      If there is no incentive to work hard (IE inequality in distribution) then there is no incentive to create more wealth which would later be redistributed in some way or another (usually in the form of tax or welfare) to the least well-off group.

    • @KawishSuiii
      @KawishSuiii 4 роки тому +2

      @@joecherfan2547 Thanks, this was needed for my assignment.

  • @ingridlopez8633
    @ingridlopez8633 2 роки тому

    thanks

  • @lyslexic
    @lyslexic 6 років тому

    Thanks Buddy, Helped me loads! :)

  • @ludovicgeldhof916
    @ludovicgeldhof916 5 років тому

    Well explained, thanks!

  • @ingersollprojects7636
    @ingersollprojects7636 5 років тому

    Thank you for the help

  • @RAHULYADAV6235662
    @RAHULYADAV6235662 8 років тому +1

    great

  • @seanmillea3475
    @seanmillea3475 8 років тому

    Perfect

  • @conphzhi
    @conphzhi 8 років тому

    thanks!