EWOW: BOOK VS MACHINE

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 70

  • @AFasterSlowpoke
    @AFasterSlowpoke 7 місяців тому +21

    Cary is probably gonna make a prompt that is too violent for ChatGPT and the 100 AI responses are just gonna be "I'm sorry, but I can't generate a response."

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  7 місяців тому +2

      You're right, I mean even the EWOW 2 prompt might influence the AI into saying something about Tide Pods being bad for your health, mainly because they don't have the sense of taste! Because we all know they're delicious, but AI just doesn't know that.

    • @tabletgenesis3439
      @tabletgenesis3439 6 місяців тому

      As an AI language model,

  • @FizzyFang
    @FizzyFang 7 місяців тому +6

    Everyone, start making 11 word responses! By watching the video, you will find out that AI doesn’t always know how to count to 11!!!!! We can point each AI out!

  • @camdagreat
    @camdagreat 7 місяців тому +3

    As also an EWOW contestant, here's my advice-
    Look for certain personal responses- they will likely have more personality added. Like, a rude one. No one would make a rude response. Also, it depends on comedy use. If it sounds like a clown, I'd suggest being skeptical. Lastly, some responses in the future may be made so AIs will be obviously seen. Hope this advice helps! Also, great video!

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  7 місяців тому +2

      It's hard to make ChatGPT mean or rude, same with making it use dark humour etc. That's why people who made 9/11 jokes got good rankings, they just couldn't be AI, You're completely right about AIs having more of a "caricatured" personality.

  • @quirkyburger4090
    @quirkyburger4090 7 місяців тому +5

    0:18 Bro just turned into Vsauce 😂

  • @member.x.from.sai-teiki
    @member.x.from.sai-teiki 7 місяців тому +5

    Great booksona

  • @PxPtheBook
    @PxPtheBook 8 місяців тому +7

    Us, the literature, will show those techno-fakes who ran this show since ‘15!

  • @FectoForgoGaming
    @FectoForgoGaming 5 місяців тому +5

    It's crazy that half of us did worse than ANY of the AI in EWOW 2. At least they responded.
    Jokes aside, I don't think any AI will make the top 30. But there might be chance of them getting to the top 100.

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  5 місяців тому

      We'll only see after we find out how many got out in the first wave

    • @MannifyYT2024
      @MannifyYT2024 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Tomatowskiaccording to Cary, 0.

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  5 місяців тому +2

      @@MannifyYT2024 ...Yeah, I know that worries me a lot, looks like the AI is much better than we thought it would be

  • @XballStuff
    @XballStuff 7 місяців тому +2

    Books VS Chat GPT: The Greatest War of the 21st Century

  • @cmaklonowa6223
    @cmaklonowa6223 9 місяців тому +3

    We be replacing AI with this one! 🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @thatoneredcoinwhoanimates
    @thatoneredcoinwhoanimates 6 місяців тому +3

    im sorry soldier,i have lost, wait cary dont do it, NUH UH AAAAAAAAAAAA *gets thrown out of a rock*

  • @strawberryzz99
    @strawberryzz99 2 місяці тому +1

    Finally an animated EWOW
    Cuz I don’t understands all videos

  • @Numbergamer2024
    @Numbergamer2024 6 місяців тому +3

    When first looking at the amount of humans in EWOW, I thought that we would win because it’s at a ratio of 165:1. But humans are lazy, and half of them dont do the prompts. What if all 100 of the AI responds every time? This would make it more scary for the humans, and they could have a smaller chance. If humans were be able to find their own responses, they could rank them 1st and the AI won’t stand a chance! But it would only be possible when there are 100+ EWOWers left. And finding your response that you know that is made by a human would be hard to find. So I think the AI will win this experiment.

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  6 місяців тому

      Well, I don't think so, the biggest problem is people not thinking about AI at all, AI might respond all the time, but the quality of the responses isn't as good.

  • @uniqueglaceon694
    @uniqueglaceon694 7 місяців тому +1

    I spent a lot of time trying to find my response in EWOW 1A (I sadly couldn't), and I noticed some irregularities in some responses. I don't think Cary Individually programmed them. Cary likely got a them programmed in "batches." There was an abnormal number of ones that were talking about mario, stranger things, and also some that were incredibly self-conceited. I don't really remember the others, but that genuinely might be a good idea to help up root out certain bots. We shouldn't rally around certain responses getting out, because there is a non-zero chance that it's a false positive, but I do think that this might be a way that we root out the bots.

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  7 місяців тому +1

      Yeah I noticed the similar responses, the AI might be programmed in batches.

  • @TheReddieRed
    @TheReddieRed 5 місяців тому +2

    O yeah, i completly forgot.

  • @elmigui3204
    @elmigui3204 6 місяців тому +2

    I actually forgot that there were 100 AI in EWOW

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  6 місяців тому +2

      To be honest not surprised, Cary mentioned it only in the 1st episode.

  • @MeesterTweester
    @MeesterTweester 7 місяців тому +3

    There are AI text detectors online, those would probably help.

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  7 місяців тому +1

      Wow! I did not expect you in the comments, the legendary MeesterTweester! Yeah you're totally right about the AI detectors, I could've mentioned it in the video, but I don't think people are gonna use them anyway, because writing down a suspicious prompt letter by letter
      to check if it's written by AI might be too much for some, but it is a really useful tool.

    • @AnimationsIgnited
      @AnimationsIgnited 7 місяців тому +3

      Or just read the texts, theres usually thousands of responses. AI is honestly 9.8 times out of 10 has a really recognizable style of writing, and honestly just aren't good or creative at all so are likely to lose, even if that is later on.

  • @evrgrn_prdctns
    @evrgrn_prdctns 7 місяців тому +2

    CHAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGE!!!!!!!!⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️

  • @LemonAid_osc
    @LemonAid_osc 9 місяців тому +2

    Nice

  • @CloudTheAngeloud
    @CloudTheAngeloud 7 місяців тому +2

    Down With The AI Bots
    (I’m Cosmic Virgo btw)

  • @XorbityXorbGlowbe
    @XorbityXorbGlowbe 7 місяців тому +1

    YOU DOOMED ME I SAID A TPOT REFERENCE

  • @aaronp26
    @aaronp26 8 місяців тому +4

    By checking punctuation marks and if it starts with a capital letter

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  8 місяців тому

      This is a great idea! I didn't think of that lol.

    • @aaronp26
      @aaronp26 8 місяців тому +1

      Lol

    • @infinitytower8957
      @infinitytower8957 7 місяців тому +2

      AI is great at punctuation though...

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  7 місяців тому +2

      @@infinitytower8957 yup, but we useless life forms are not

    • @infinitytower8957
      @infinitytower8957 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Tomatowski I am.

  • @ryanmapping7944
    @ryanmapping7944 7 місяців тому +2

    No flippin way

  • @DieRepublikCraztina
    @DieRepublikCraztina 7 місяців тому +1

    How about in 2b, a lot of people give the same response? ChatGPT can never be in on the scoop that everyone is saying the same thing, meaning that whoever doesn't say the same thing could be an AI!
    Idk

    • @abugidaiguess
      @abugidaiguess 7 місяців тому +1

      i don't think we could get enough people to agree to say the same thing
      also that only loses the AI one life if we manage it, and it would kinda suck if we all said the same thing three separate times

    • @DieRepublikCraztina
      @DieRepublikCraztina 7 місяців тому

      @@abugidaiguess oh well
      How'd ya do in 1b?

    • @abugidaiguess
      @abugidaiguess 7 місяців тому +1

      @@DieRepublikCraztina 4,197th, somehow. what about you?

    • @DieRepublikCraztina
      @DieRepublikCraztina 7 місяців тому

      @@abugidaiguess oh wow! I'm talking to a smart guy! I got 6855th place!

  • @kinyacat5919
    @kinyacat5919 4 місяці тому +1

    I swear if an AI won...

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  4 місяці тому

      It is possible... Sadly

  • @K_rma
    @K_rma 7 місяців тому +1

    they will most likely not have a booksona

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  7 місяців тому

      This won't really help, we want to know who's AI during voting so we can bring them down and we can't see booksonas during it but during the results, you're right they probably won't have a booksona!

    • @not_estains
      @not_estains 7 місяців тому

      @@Tomatowski but cary can probably ask it to make an AI generated booksona and then he will make it into an actuall booksona

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  7 місяців тому +1

      @@not_estains bro, Cary can just use the generator he recommended in EP 1, and as I said the booksonas don't matter during voting

  • @SuomiNamco
    @SuomiNamco 7 місяців тому +2

    Completely disagree with your point, I dont think we should be focusing on getting rid of the AI, it's still a TWOW it's not like the game will end after all of them die they're just additional contestants.
    Focusing on getting rid of them has caused loads of problems, there are a bunch of 11 word responses (including mine) that have been downvoted because they were suspected to be AI, which is just stupid. I have a bunch of friends who are experienced TWOWers that have managed to fall into the life-loss zone because of this (mind you some of these people have won fully-fledged miniTWOWs)
    This is mainly the reason why the leaderboard is basically RNG. I mean 7th has no punctuation and is 10 words, while 9th place is only 8 words. THERE'S EVEN a 1 WORD RESPONSE that prized...

    • @Tomatowski
      @Tomatowski  7 місяців тому +1

      You're right, the game won't end when all of the AI is gone, but I never said we should be only focusing on it, it's more of a thing to remember during voting, the first results really depended on luck, getting 1 vote is like flipping coin cause everyone will find different things creative, funny etc. but with the 3 lives we have we can learn how to seem less suspicious while the AI can't learn on their mistakes cause they can't watch EWOW 2a.