Does The Simulation Exist?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 кві 2024
  • Are we ALL simulated characters?? Join us... and find out!
    Subscribe: wmojo.com/unveiled-subscribe
    In this video, Unveiled takes a closer look at the simulation hypothesis, and all the mind-bending theories that are inspired by it!
    This is Unveiled, giving you incredible answers to extraordinary questions!
    Find more amazing videos for your curiosity here:
    What If Aliens Are Just 5x Smarter Than Us? - • What If Aliens Are Jus...
    Do We Enter a Parallel Universe When We Die? - • Do We Enter A Parallel...
    #Simulation #Multiverse #ParallelUniverse #Parallel #ParallelWorld #Space #Science #Unveiled
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 105

  • @unveiled
    @unveiled  3 місяці тому +9

    What do you think? ARE we living in a simulation? Subscribe: wmojo.com/unveiled-subscribe

    • @lealoo6287
      @lealoo6287 3 місяці тому +3

      I never thought this was true until I started playing The Sims. In the original version your Sim had full autonomy but if you didn't interact with the Sim, the Sim would appear to look at you and shrug their shoulders as if waiting for a command. Gives me the creeps how this game has advanced now. I've experienced Deja vu and once during a particularly heavy emotional time I saw what appeared to be a transparent grid in the air when I looked out my window. I thought it might be raining until, suddenly I realized it was 0's and 1's running in vertical lines across my field of vision. Rubbed my eyes and thought I might be going insane. I've only seen this a few times and still don't understand it.

    • @savannahshepherd2283
      @savannahshepherd2283 3 місяці тому +1

      Cern recently discovered virtual particles which could be turned into real world particles 😮 makes me wonder wtheel lol

  • @anurangawijepala9982
    @anurangawijepala9982 3 місяці тому +4

    Sleeping might be a mechanism which saves the overall power consumption of the simulation

  • @numberwunsaifu2575
    @numberwunsaifu2575 3 місяці тому +13

    I need to contact the simulations manager. I am deeply unsatisfied with this product.

    • @Crypto-Legend
      @Crypto-Legend 2 місяці тому +2

      Take it up with God lol

    • @christianlee576
      @christianlee576 11 днів тому

      lol...I Know Right...This Realm SUCKS...It's Like Watching A Very Bad Movie...And Those Of US Whom Are Aware That This Realm Is BS...WE Are Locked In The Theater With People Whom Belives Their Life Matter's...lol... It's Funny Yet Tourture At The Same Time...I Mean...The Program Is VERY FLAWED...It SHOULD Be A Universal Law...That Once One Understands They Are IN The Simulation...THEY Should Ether Win A Lottery Or Their Life Should Become Amazing...The Simulations Way Of Saying..."Ok...Ok...Ok...Here... Here Is Amazing Luck...Money And Success...But . Remember Just Keep It A Secret".. lol...Because Once You KNOW This Realm Is BS...And The Light Was A Trap To Recarnate...All This Is Doing Is Pissing Alot Of Older Soul's Off...And...Well...A Soul Is Part Of GOD...And I'm Sure They Do NOT Want To Piss Off A Part Of GOD...I'm Sure Instead Of Going Into The Light...GOD Could Tear Their Simulation DOWN!!!

  • @sebastiendebons421
    @sebastiendebons421 3 місяці тому +12

    I've discussed this theory with my father to see what he thought about it.
    He told me quickly to just do what I thought was right and everything else would happen like it was planned ❤

  • @turnt0ff
    @turnt0ff 3 місяці тому +15

    Effectively: The Matrix is the best movie of all time.

    • @timr3023
      @timr3023 3 місяці тому +1

      Matrix I, only.:correction

    • @sarahsimmons76
      @sarahsimmons76 3 місяці тому

      Documentary

    • @UMAD666
      @UMAD666 4 дні тому

      No is not, check the film 1998 Dark City is more accurate than the matrix.

  • @kenmasters9203
    @kenmasters9203 3 місяці тому +5

    Had that experience once in the middle of a day when that ray of light bounced of the power grid cable before it entered my eyes and in that same moment realty started to disolving before me like geometry shaped objects on the dark background of a computer like program (for the lack of better comparison). That area was expanding just before my eyes. I felt really sceared and said to myself in spirit:No. Then I wayved my hand slowly covering the expanding area and it turned back to "normal". Maybe someone/thing tryed to show me this or maybe it was a pure coinsidance..? One thing I know that I cant shake this weird feeling to this day.

  • @lifeneverends7068
    @lifeneverends7068 3 місяці тому +8

    Best video on this subject. I trully believe in Sim theory since it answers everything. Surely it is theory of everything.

  • @stevenswitzer5154
    @stevenswitzer5154 3 місяці тому +11

    " If real is what you can hear, taste, see, smell, and touch.... Then the real is nothing more than electrical impulses, in your mind."

    • @kalismols606
      @kalismols606 3 місяці тому +2

      So everyone is just tricking themselves simultaneously into believing they are real

    • @elo2dcrv
      @elo2dcrv 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@kalismols606its not a trick if you dont know better

    • @alexanderbreston9918
      @alexanderbreston9918 3 місяці тому +1

      The real you is individual creating consciousness outside the universe where it is dark and we have no avatar. Energy - code - matter. You're not your avatar, mind, ego or ideas, thought and feeling. I think something happened and we were tricked into this realm which i see a very bad copie of the original, which was destroyed by a plasma event.

  • @DimBak-cx6uc
    @DimBak-cx6uc 3 місяці тому +5

    The right question is why this being didn't destroy this simulation why it permit mistakes and why it create billions of galaxies what the reason if it want to keep humans here in this planet!

  • @drtk9300
    @drtk9300 3 місяці тому +1

    Excellent thought provoking video. Reality is created by our consciousness, and where “consciousness “ comes from is a mystery, perhaps it’s controlled by a larger “mainframe “ computer outside space and time. You may call it The One

  • @martybee6701
    @martybee6701 3 місяці тому +1

    Why as human beings are we so interested in simulation theory ? You would've thought the matrix would not allow us to ask such questions for fear of screwing it all up. A bit like the avatar on your fave computer game who just stops playing the game, turns to you on the screen and starts discussing Jung or Schaupenhauer or something imstead ?

  • @observingsystem
    @observingsystem 3 місяці тому

    I like the idea that we don't make games that are more boring than our reality, so if we're in a simulation it probably means we're having a more interesting life because of that. Wouldn't it be great though, if there was something like being able to check if the green cone is over your head to see if you're the Sim that's being played or an NPC? 😄

  • @bradybugge5128
    @bradybugge5128 3 місяці тому +3

    Dmt breakthroughs will show that we are absolutely in a simulation. Or in a multidimensional reality!

    • @kareemsaid5709
      @kareemsaid5709 3 місяці тому

      Well it's scientific fact we are in the latter lol I do think there more dimensions we are unaware of. I also think consciousness, the same consciousness, permeates all matter and we truly don't understand what that it is or does yet. This explains the observer effect and quantum entanglement. Everything is one and it's a holographic projection, a multidimensional universe.

  • @savannahshepherd2283
    @savannahshepherd2283 3 місяці тому +1

    It is as you say its like the movie avatar our souls go into our avatar from a higher dimension

    • @willms7173
      @willms7173 3 місяці тому

      I find it interesting that I'm in my particular "avatar." Are individual souls unique like a fingerprint? Or is it our physical bodies, and experiences that makes us different?

  • @sideoutside
    @sideoutside 3 місяці тому

    The problem with this theory lies in the question of whether self awareness is computational, if it's not, nothing can create true consciousness, only facsimiles of it. I believe the philosophy of analytical idealism, where everything that exists is made of consciousness. Not that everything is conscious, there's a difference. A tree in your dream is simply a dream made by conscious thought, you don't experience it, it's just there, reality is no different imo.

  • @Arnold001-1
    @Arnold001-1 3 місяці тому +1

    Who created the creator of the simulation? And who created that creator? And so on and so forth. HOW DID IT ALL START!!??

  • @bobbieleighs
    @bobbieleighs 3 місяці тому

    I have encountered many experiences of deja rev which proves Albert Einstein's theory of time. The deja rev occurs over a year after the dream. Also I fully believe that my overly positive energy is manifesting my amazingly great reality.

  • @bobbieleighs
    @bobbieleighs 3 місяці тому

    I also believe " I think, therefore I am"!!!!!!!!! Almost Everything you do in life is affected by your own confidence in doing anything you do. I'm only beautiful, because I know I am. You have to own everything you do. Example, if you're stealing a tv from Walmart, you have to walk out confidently like you own it.

  • @rachelquinnell5618
    @rachelquinnell5618 23 дні тому

    When did the simulation begin? How did my grandmother know her grandmother ?

  • @SamanthaPyper-sl4ye
    @SamanthaPyper-sl4ye 3 місяці тому

    Here are 4 more examples contrasting contradictory classical formulations with their non-contradictory infinitesimal/monadological counterparts:
    9) Quantum Field Infinities
    Contradictory:
    Quantum Field Theory
    Feynman Diagrams with infinite terms like:
    ∫ d4k / (k2 - m2) = ∞
    Perturbative quantum field theories rely on renormalization to subtract infinite quantities from equations, which is an ad-hoc procedure lacking conceptual justification.
    Non-Contradictory:
    Infinitesimal Regulator QFT
    ∫ d4k / [(k2 - m2 + ε2)1/2] < ∞
    Using infinitesimals ε as regulators instead of adhoc renormalization avoids true mathematical infinities while preserving empirical results.
    10) Cosmological Constant Problem
    Contradictory:
    Λ = Observed Value ≈ 10-122
    QFT Vacuum Energy = ∞
    General relativity's cosmological constant Λ represents vacuum energy density, but quantum field theories produce infinite unobservable values.
    Non-Contradictory:
    Nonlinear Cosmological Monadic Functor
    Λ = βα(Uα , SαNS , n)
    Treating Λ as a relational parameter from a flat nonlinear monadological functor between curved physical vacuum states and number of monadic elements resolves the infinite discrepancy.
    11) Computational Complexity
    Contradictory:
    Halting Problem for Turing Machines
    There is no general algorithm to decide if an arbitrary program will halt or run forever on a given input.
    This leads to the unsolvable Turing degree at the heart of computational complexity theory.
    Non-Contradictory:
    Infinitary Lambda Calculus
    λx.t ≝ {x→a | a ∈ monadic realizability domain of t}
    Representing computations via the interaction of infinitesimal monads and non-standard realizers allows non-Church/Turing computational models avoiding the halting problem paradox.
    12) Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems
    Contradictory:
    Formal Arithmetic Theories T
    ∃ φ: Neither T ⊢ φ nor T ⊢ ¬φ (true but unprovable)
    Gödel showed any consistent recursive axiomatized theory lacks the means to determine truth/falsehood of certain statements, exposing incompleteness.
    Non-Contradictory:
    ℒ Infinitesimal Topos Language
    ∀φ, ℒ ⊣ V(φ): φ or ¬φ (internal semantic completeness)
    Representing propositions internally in an infinitesimal-valued topos logical environment avoids incompleteness while retaining semantic consistency.
    In each case, the contradictory classical theories contain internal paradoxes, ambiguities or insolubles stemming from:
    - Mathematical infinities
    - Over-idealized continua
    - Discrete/continuous dualities
    - Formal self-reference issues
    The non-contradictory monadological approaches resolve these by:
    - Using infinitesimals, combinatorial realizability
    - Treating the continuum as derived
    - Fusing discrete/continua dualisms
    - Representing self-reference via internal pluralistic relations
    We can discern an overarching pattern that many legendary paradoxes and insolubles emerge from overly simplistic classical assumptions - namely strict separability, continua simplicity, dualities between discrete/continuous, and over-idealization of formal representations.
    In stark contrast, the non-contradictory infinitesimal and monadological modelings embrace:
    - Relational holistic pluralisms
    - Quantized discrete/continuum complementarities
    - Deriving continua from ordered monadic elements
    - Representing self-referential phenomena via internal internalities
    By realigning mathematics with these metaphysically non-contradictory starting points, seemingly paradoxical or incomplete classical theories can be reframed, have contradictions dissolved, and be extended into remarkably broader, coherent analytic regimes.
    This lends further weight to the hypothesis that our quest for a paradox-free, maximally general mathematics and physics may require renovating logical foundations from infinitesimal monadological kernels - precisely as Leibniz first envisaged. His pluralistic perspectival vision may be an idea whose "time" has finally come.

  • @fazilhamza1476
    @fazilhamza1476 3 місяці тому +1

    I rather believe in stimulating theory to see the white clouds come out.

  • @dianeshields2655
    @dianeshields2655 3 місяці тому

    Science points to we are a simulation

  • @jasoncook7378
    @jasoncook7378 3 місяці тому

    NGT now says he doesn't think we are in a simulation.

  • @whimsicallady9759
    @whimsicallady9759 3 місяці тому

    The matrix was a vision the lady (the oracle character) supposedly had and the story was stolen or bought and not much else was heard of from her and the brothers reasoning for turning into the sisters had something to do w prisons and that’s why the other matrix movies were a lot less inspiring.
    Huh, as I’m listening to this video the word “philosophy “ popped in my head as he said it, Netflix lil background commercials for movies is playing as he said split, the movie “split” came up, I’ve been wanting to rewatch the matrix, was just thinking wondering if it was on Netflix, it came up as I had just thought of it ,also he said it in the video at the moment I looked at the tv and saw matrix in sync with him saying the word matrix.
    Things like that though on a video like this I mean are just not soo strange , just thought to share and does this happen a lot for others?

  • @Jianichie
    @Jianichie 3 місяці тому

    Basically Star Ocean 3

  • @Veed.l0
    @Veed.l0 3 місяці тому

    I think it may be a big misconception that observing microscopic things 'changes' them. More accurately; whatever measuring instrument you're using just highights the detail of subatomic waves.

    • @prezlamen7906
      @prezlamen7906 3 місяці тому +1

      More like wave function colapses when you observe something and maybe even entangles you.

    • @kareemsaid5709
      @kareemsaid5709 3 місяці тому +2

      @@prezlamen7906 which, to me, is more indicative that we are connected to it or even one with it. People don't seem to realize that intent and focus matters so even if a human sets a machine to take the measurement, it does not matter. Same thing. Entanglement and the observer effect are the 2 biggest pieces of evidence that everything is quite possibly one thing. I think this ties in with the holographic universe and pan-psychism as well.

    • @prezlamen7906
      @prezlamen7906 3 місяці тому

      @@kareemsaid5709 Ive read "The Law of One" and i like it. I like to think it is true. Dare i say i believe?
      So many things point at unity, even the theme of this convo and observable data.

  • @picklerick7953
    @picklerick7953 3 місяці тому

    We could be millions of sims deep bruh when you die you go to the sim u entered this sim in

  • @JoshuaDracul
    @JoshuaDracul 3 місяці тому

    undeniably engaging comment here ❤❤❤

  • @abstraction_not
    @abstraction_not 3 місяці тому

    Mandela effect is glitch in system

  • @sirbarringtonwomblembe4098
    @sirbarringtonwomblembe4098 3 місяці тому

    THE simualtion? What fn simulation?

  • @planetarystargazer
    @planetarystargazer 3 місяці тому +11

    What If The Earth rotated backwards

    • @HShango
      @HShango 3 місяці тому +6

      Reversal of Earth's rotation could have minor effects on weather and ocean currents.
      Or
      It would cause catastrophic changes in weather patterns, ocean currents, magnetic field, and potentially result in mass extinctions.

    • @WtfYouMeanDude
      @WtfYouMeanDude 3 місяці тому +4

      If you face the opposite direction then its spinning backwards...

    • @WtfYouMeanDude
      @WtfYouMeanDude 3 місяці тому +1

      If it spun backwards everyone would go flying when it changes direction and get serious whiplash

    • @WtfYouMeanDude
      @WtfYouMeanDude 3 місяці тому +3

      Time would go backswards as well.. also every song and movie wil play in reverse.. superman did it to save lois in pt2

    • @chikitomonset4866
      @chikitomonset4866 3 місяці тому +4

      Maybe my ex would return

  • @prezlamen7906
    @prezlamen7906 3 місяці тому +1

    How is matter finite when its literally energy?

    • @jwb52z9
      @jwb52z9 3 місяці тому

      Energy isn't infinite.

    • @prezlamen7906
      @prezlamen7906 3 місяці тому

      @@jwb52z9 How do you know? Energy on our level, like electrons jumping might seem finite but before that, energy literally pops into existence from somewhere and forms whatever.

  • @letstalk6007
    @letstalk6007 3 місяці тому +3

    If we are in one, we will never figure it out. Creator will always be a step ahead of us figuring it out.

    • @prezlamen7906
      @prezlamen7906 3 місяці тому

      What if that creator is just a lame nobody, an idiot and all other creators laugh at him?
      If thats the case it can make a mistake and wed figure it out.

  • @dianeshields2655
    @dianeshields2655 3 місяці тому

    Quantum physhics have the rules....

  • @tiskfendu
    @tiskfendu 3 місяці тому +1

    What is it simulating?

  • @Homunculas
    @Homunculas Місяць тому

    If we are indeed in a simulation, I think the likely reason could be to gauge our moral reactions to questions such as Palestine/Israel or NATO/Russia.

  • @Jim-yz7qf
    @Jim-yz7qf 3 місяці тому

    So musk purported that the chance of us being in a simulation is massive, but he failed deeply in his logic. Either we don’t or we are last in the chain, because we can’t simulate yet.

    • @noone1mportant.357
      @noone1mportant.357 3 місяці тому

      Correct. It's just for character development. If one is to believe in any kind of religion, then they believe in incarnation and reincarnation. If anyone believes in near-death experience, then they believe in a similar. To believe in those, would mean that you are at least twice removed from base reality. This would be the vessel state, in which we live for experiences and then return to the surreal realm of energies where we came from, but that is only middle ground. That would still not be the base reality. It is ethereal. If it was a computer simulation, that would mean if there is a reason we are living the lives that we are living. We are far past this and this is either for entertainment or growth.

    • @roncoleman3259
      @roncoleman3259 3 місяці тому +1

      Yet is the key word and who in the common public knows what is being done ?

    • @kareemsaid5709
      @kareemsaid5709 3 місяці тому

      @@noone1mportant.357 I don't believe it is a sim but just entertainment or growth? It could be for SO MANY more reasons than that. A science experiment, learning about our own history, learning about so many things for whomever is running it. It could just be necessary for existence at all because real reality is one cosmic thing in a void and it splits it's consciousness into what we know as reality to see itself and understand what it is and does. The possibilities are endless.

    • @user-rm4tv3nk2h
      @user-rm4tv3nk2h 2 місяці тому

      When we become able to produce a compelling reality, who is to say that we create only one? Everything suggests that we create unimaginably many. Therein lies the answer to your problem with the "chain" and that we don't need to be the "last". In fact, there are many theories for parallel universes/multiverses. Try to visualize a tree with many branches. Some die out. On top of that, there is the whole problem of understanding the concept of time. Past, present and future exist at the same time.

  • @Ibalistic_hedge
    @Ibalistic_hedge 3 місяці тому

    Scientists make out that they are so smart and yet they seem to miss the many flaws with simulation theory.
    Humans already know how we evolved, so that's the first idea debunked. Also, why would they make it so imperfect when they have so much power to make the sim be perfect?
    We already know climate change. We know it's a natural phenomenon that we can't stop and shouldn't stop bc that would be catastrophic. We know that we have sped it up and need to slow it down. We also know how to slow it down, it's juts we're lied to by scientists and the media that electricity is the answer which isn't true. Electricity is as bad as fossil fuels. Hydrogen is the real answer. So that's the second theory debunked, and the entertainment theory doesn't make much sense bc why wouldn't they just put a film on or go to the park and play rounders or something?

  • @awesomeasever8370
    @awesomeasever8370 3 місяці тому

    ????

  • @oldrabbit2121
    @oldrabbit2121 3 місяці тому +1

    everyone referring to conman musk deserves an unsub 😂🤣😂

  • @dianeshields2655
    @dianeshields2655 3 місяці тому

    The Buddists know

  • @punkeasy
    @punkeasy 3 місяці тому

    No it hasn't

  • @MrWolfheart111
    @MrWolfheart111 3 місяці тому

    Ya You all are just a NPC in my sim world. Ya, sorry dudes.

  • @midnightmover2329
    @midnightmover2329 3 місяці тому

    If you believe in Simulation theory you may just as well believe in God

  • @Abdul.73
    @Abdul.73 3 місяці тому +2

    God is the only conclusion ..!!!

    • @kareemsaid5709
      @kareemsaid5709 3 місяці тому +1

      LOL you people. I agree it points to some sort overlying SOMETHING but it's ridiculous you jump to an organized religion type 'god'. Utterly absurd. It could be a force of raw consciousness for all you know, not a being, never was a being or anything like a being. It could be many things you just aren't thinking cosmically. In any case we as a race need to explore consciousness as deeply as we possibly can becauase we truly do not know what is or does yet and it very likely holds the key to unlocking the door of reality.

    • @Abdul.73
      @Abdul.73 3 місяці тому

      @@kareemsaid5709 Why I relate it to God is the following: life is a test full of trials and tribulations....one verse that cements it all together is the following;
      Quran 2:155
      And We will surely test you with something of fear and hunger and a loss of wealth and lives and fruits, but give good tidings to the patient,

    • @Abdul.73
      @Abdul.73 2 місяці тому

      @@kareemsaid5709 The only way of life that correlates with the simulation hypothesis is the fact that the Quran mentions this life is a test and I believe this so-called physical reality is being fed to the soul, creating an illusion of matter. The simulation totally matches my belief.

  • @ndowroccus4168
    @ndowroccus4168 3 місяці тому

    Stop freaking out when scientists, thst hsve too much free time & not enough NDT swag….put out imagination theories.

  • @AA-eq5wk
    @AA-eq5wk 3 місяці тому

    2, 3, 5, 666, 9999999999

    • @kylespratt4072
      @kylespratt4072 3 місяці тому

      Huh

    • @AA-eq5wk
      @AA-eq5wk 3 місяці тому

      @@kylespratt4072 if this seems confusing, you may have a problem following a logical algorithm

    • @Coneelfrancis
      @Coneelfrancis 3 місяці тому

      ​@@AA-eq5wkOr his/Her brain electrical signal 🤔 needs to be rewired for any glitch

    • @AA-eq5wk
      @AA-eq5wk 3 місяці тому

      @@Coneelfrancis looks like franny's looking a spanner... reality is a clean 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and then 7... this is nature's way... this 'signal" should appeal to you... now on the other hand the opposite of natural is manmade or religion... so a chain reaction that leads to an anti-nature is missing crucial steps... the steps needed for a fusion of creativity... but instead the people demand a 'glitch" ...so this is your ditch

  • @smittyo624
    @smittyo624 3 місяці тому

    Ffs... why do you have to end your sentences lowering/raising your voice like that? It's so off putting.
    You're providing great info but your cadence is very distracting, especially for neurodivergents like myself. I couldn't get past a few minutes :(