Shipwreck From 1800s Found Buried Under New Building Site In Seaport District
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 вер 2024
- An old shipwreck has been found buried in the Seaport District and, according to the city’s archaeologist, it is a rare find. WBZ-TV's David Robichaud reports.
Looks like they've already pounded a beam through the ship..
yeah but the beams are in a row, its not like they purposely punched the beam through, it just happened to be where the beam went
This area is haunted. I worked as a security guard over there for some years and I would hear the creepiest things in my building at night. Most notably a man yelling in the penthouse of one of high rises when the building was completely empty. It was like he was yelling to someone..almost like something you would hear in a haunted abandoned mine. Shadows under the doors of empty rooms. I’d really like to know the history of this area.
Nice from the company to halt work and investigate... Very responsible from their part... Not all of them do that. Actually, most would just bulldoze the darn thing and move on...
skanska is a swedish company :>
explains given their value on maritime history such as the Vasa.@@brakzz7145
That ship in itself is a treasure.
DoctorRobertNeville I agree
Wow guys they immediatly halted excavation in that area, most other builders would have just built ontop of it for a foundation
Amazing company. Most wouldn't be responsible enough to stop work for this.
Such finds are often are found at construction sites all over the world! But such finds, cost the construction company quite a bit, so I thank them for their contribution and I hope the exhibit of the ships remains gives them credit!
of course the archeologist would like to have more time but time is money, such is often the case all over the world and we own much of what is found to companies that halted construction to let scientist and historians study and preserve the finds!
"A ship can carry a boat but a boat cannot carry a ship"
Just to throw a wrench into the machinery. There are ships to transport ships to, such as the ship that transported back the damaged USS Cole! But I agree with the old saying, and it's still a pretty good rule of thumb!
Tugboats: *I find this a threat to our people. A declaration of w a r*
That’s amazing! find out who the owner of the ship was trace family lineage and any living relatives might might own land without knowing lol
It is not very unusual to find scuttled ships in Boston. Part of the process of land making was to scuttle old, unwanted ships between the wharves. It was called "wharfing out." They also found a ship when they were building 75 State Street.
skanska what a great company to work for.
that ship looks like it's in horrible condition. where is it now?
At last the've found the charlote...bravo
Good job for that big corp to halt and proceed with caution 🤙🙏👍
*watches **0:11*
*clears throat*
ITS NOT A BOAT ITS A
SHIIIIIIIIIIIPPPPPPPPP!!!!!
I hope they could try and haul it out carefully of course but I doubt it due to its age it would probably fall apart
what's a ship doing on land? did they just decide to leave it there?
That area used to be a tidal mudflat. It was filled in to make buildable land.
Much of Boston is reclaimed land. The original area looked much different. For a better idea, this pic shows the original coastline, surrounded by all the reclaimed land (gray areas): www.kuan.net/archives/boston1630overlay-cleaned.gif
Pretty Dank imp
priceless lol
I don't think an archaeology find should be dug with a backhoe.
its good publicity to stop the work to look at it also they had a post in the middle so its not like they were rigorously working in that area but wow nice find
Most Likely, that "post" is a piling from the previous building, and was there before this excavation had even started
all these ignorant people in the comments who have never held a real job just assume all construction companies would destroy it...LOL
Its too bad that most people think money is the most important thing in this world. so what if the company was losing money , are they supposed to gain all the time ?
Are they supposed to just let all the other workers go home without a paycheck? What about renegotiating the contracts that stipulate when a particular part of work gets done so that other companies and crews can begin their work? If I have 27 cement trucks dedicated to bringing cement to start pouring the first floor on December 1, and I have a penalty clause in my contract if I postpone, and a penalty clause in my contract with the workers if they don't get work done starting the second floor, etc, how much is a horribly preserved, non significant piece of rotted wood worth? Most of this worlds civilizations are built on top of previous civilizations and foundations. You cannot just stop everything to dig it all up. That is all we would be doing. Someone has to pay for it. Why should the shareholders of Skanska pay for it? They invested in a building company, not an archeological dig. So if you depended on dividends to pay your rent, and Skanska's stock price went down, would you still be so cavalier about the company making money? I guess if its not your money to give away, its OK with you.
Noah's Ark, thank God!
I'm sure god lover. Stfu
Bunches of ships are under the ground. Maybe it's under of our house.
What about all the reclaimed land in monaco, nigeria , and UAE
ok that Gilligan's Island joke was bad
This blonde newscaster looks like a beer drinker .
Wow. "Histoical" It is not even old. My fucking house would be historical too than.
Your house is from the 1800's?
There's plenty of houses in my area built in the mid to late 1800's. Mine was constructed in the 1920's.
Leo Thorne 1882 was the construction of my house.
There is a big difference between 1920 vs 1800s.....there at is at least 40-100 year difference, when that ship was dated (assuming the latest is around 1880s).
You mean "then". Obviously your fucking education is historic.
hi thinks like i want to say it
Priceless? Some lime and a few nails? Yeah, that really dwarfs the discovery of King Tut's tomb, alright...
You really are ignorant and stupid arn't you? They have much more! I'm guess you're a Trump, supporter to!
LOL. What about protecting the archaeological integrity of the historical landfill site?
I've seen some pretty bad news reporting, but this is one of the worst. The two reporters with all the talking with their hands, the floozy blonde with all the extra emphasis on every other word, and the fact that she just had to throw in the word AWESOME at the end. Obligatory tag-team male-female news anchors in one of the worst examples. Then we go on location and the reporter there starts the segment with a childish rendition to the theme from Gilligan's Island. And the so-called site archaeologist talks like a typical woman, where every sentence is a question.
And then at the end, the speculation that they will find gold, after the idea was put forth that the ship ran aground on mud flats, and its cargo stripped.
Do I get the vague feeling you don't like US TV news broadcasts?
It's a 100 year old piece of nothing. It has zero archaeological value. Regardless of what was said in the video, the law requires company's to stop if they unearth an unknown artifact. And the incentive is to take your chances and keep digging, especially when a nothing ends up costing you big bucks...
F off moron, its a part of our history.