I dont think Raskolnikov ever repented genuinely for killing a person. He only repented for committing a deed which he did not have the potential to deal with. What he gives away in the end is his pride and ego. He comes down to the ground and completely accepts that he is just an ordinary person.
Bhuvanesh N I felt the same way. And I’ve re-read the last few pages in an attempt to find even a slight clue that he truly repents. While serving his time in Siberia, Raskolnikov mentions something along the lines of how he does not feel bad for the old woman. This made me feel uneasy because I felt that the book would have an “unhappy ending”. But the fact that he accepted himself as an ordinary man and let go of his pride (which crushed his soul so much that he was kneeling and sobbing in front of Sonia) was in so many ways, just as impactful; because a. it wasn’t that he was inherently bad that made him commit the crime because he clearly has empathy and goes out of his way to help others and b. in coming to terms with his normalcy, he can set aside his hyper rational thoughts and theories and lead the rest of his life without isolating himself and in doing so, he is less likely to commit further atrocities.
I got the impression that he didn't change his mind on the theory, just that didn't have the right to the commit it. I.e. if somebody else *worthy.. exceptional* commited the act, they would have the moral right to do so. It might be a cliche, but I think at the end what really woke him up and brought him back to reality was the idea he could leave his own rationalisations aside and live according to somebody else's traditions and believes. Live *for* somebody else.
The point of Raskolnikov's redemption isn't being sorry for the crime. The point of his redemption is that he's a criminal but people are still able to forgive him. And that moves him so much he completely changes his outlook on life. He still belies that his murder was rational and justifiable, but he also knows that's not enough to live his life. Love and acceptance of the society is the real foundation of the human society, not reason.
I particularly love the part where he indulges himself in the sheer entertainment of being expected to believe that a student is curious and that it is not a fashion of speech. That's a great professor.
"Dostojewski deserves so much respect" ??The man is respected from Atheists,Communists,Right wingers..the man is considered one of the greatest minds ever.
Dostojevskij was opposed to socialism, atheism and (quickly summarized) anything progressive. The crowds of people that really praise him are the christians and conservatives.
@@sanderallstar6765 Dostoyevsky was, his entire life, opposed to serfdom and he detested the landed Russian aristocracy. He was opposed to socialism because it worshiped the state and and he was opposed to capitalism because it worshiped Mammon (money). He was looking for a new kind of human community that he hoped would grow out of the Russian Orthodox Church, but he even had doubts about that. He was well-known for not getting along with Orthodox priests and he rarely went to church. In one of his last letters, he told a friend that in his next novel, which would be a continuation of The Brothers Karamazov, his saintly Alyosha would leave the church, become an anarchist, and attempt to assassinate the Tsar. Dostoyevsky a conservative? No. Dostoyevsky a liberal? No. He was looking for something new which he saw as rooted in Christ. We have only scratched the surface in really understanding Dostoyevsky.
I definitely like the title : Crime Punishment and Penance. Loved the professor. Anytime I need psychological depth I go back to School. Professors are so refreshing!! Thank you.
I don’t think he’s saying that. It’s simply that we approach and receive/interpret great works of art differently at different stages of our life. Everyone should re-read the great works of literature(Shakespeare, Dostoevsky, etc) every 6-7 years from the age of 18 to the end of their life. They’ll discover new insights every time.. Hell, Read Hamlet, Lear, Macbeth, etc once a month from 18 to 80 and you’ll make a few thousand discoveries in them by 80..🎭🎼🙏
@@MarlboroughBlenheim1 Agreed. It seems that most of the students are genuinely interested in the novel. Obviously, Professor Katz has a much deeper understanding of the novel, but it is clear that the students appreciate his understanding and want to know more. As an English teacher, I would be more than happy with this engagement!
I understood once I realized this was a high school class and not college. It's a lot to ask for high school students to read and comprehend this entire novel. I mean, we only had to read things like Of Mice and Men or Lord of the Flies
Seems just the opposite to me. The students clearly did read the book, as evidenced by the array of questions they ask. Pretty impressive for high school, in my view.
well he's studied Russian like a mad dog, considering the fact he translates such book. Maybe he's a native speaker bia his parents, anyhow the point remains.
Marmeladov always has been my favourite character, ever since I first read/listened to this novel, and the teacher's fav scene is also probably mine. I wonder what the many mentions of horse carriages stand for in this play though.
I was dying for participating whenever this noble and charismatic teacher asked any question. I would have killed an old lady with an ax to be there listening to him face to face as if it were a dream, and I was riding a horse that would then be mutilated into pieces just as my dreams.
When characters switch from good and bad isn't it partly because Dostoevsky believes in the idea that most people have a duplicitous nature? A duplicitous nature such as in his second book, The Double?
michael kats the legend himself! mans has his book on indigo now reading this book currently on page 85, its kind of a hard read its been day 8. harder than the hunger games thts for sure.
so far from wat i c is tht raskinolkov is very poor and is in a alot of pressure so tht y hes all crazy. ye they even say tht is it the crime tht causes the mental illness or the illness tht causes the crime(i think it can b both)? thts y he wants to kill the lady cuz the dude is psycopathic and sociopathic from his time in st.petersburg, he mustve been fine when he was with his mother and sister back in his home town. idk bout the whole "superior man idea" yet cuz im only on page 84 but so far it just seems tht hes like bilpolar cuz first he said he was gonna commit the crime. then he said he wasnt cuz he had a dream about him being a child and seeing a horse get beaten to death and also said even if with an absolute assurance tht the plan was gonna go all well and he will b unscathed from the crime he wouldnt do it; he saw lizaveta who from tht he knew was going to b somewhere where her half sis(ivanova old woman) where he thought would b alone at tht time becuz of her lizaveta going somewhere, and now from knowing this he once again wants to commit this crime. seems like hes bipolar to a fault, hes desperate, and is sick and weak from his conditions.
I read CP when I was 14, my dad's college paperback. I devoured it. I was going through my 80s slasher film phase and the book grabbed me. I would then start to read other russian novelists and find 19th century Russia identical to 21st century America. There's a passage in Dostoevsky's The Idiot where a woman screams at her son's deadbeat friends, "you think breaking into someone's home and mugging are a form of political protest!" Something like that. Shocking how today's left in the west is mimicking Russia's elites from 150 years ago.
It is now widely accepted that the 5 novel's dostoyevsky wrote (not his early work tho) are good candidates for greatest work of literature in worlds history
Hell, could anyone explain the significance of when Raskolnikov goes to visit Sonya and forces her to read out the story of Lazarus from The Bible. I’m confused by Sonya and Raskolnikov’s reactions to this.
It’s interesting about this phenomenon that some find the redemptive ending as ringing false. I suspect that those raised as Christians, and especially Catholics, would find it much more plausible than atheists or agnostics, who would be more likely to blanche or bristle at the ending. Not saying one or the other is the “right or correct” response, just more proof that amongst we humans “where you stand depends on where you sit”….🙏🎭
Am very affected by the needless death of Elizabeth, in such a gruesome manner, for simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time. More so, by Raskalinikof's attitude. And not once does Raskalinikof care or regret that. Hence, it is my view that Raskalinikov remains an unrepentant and dangerous man even when released after his sentence.
Yep other people around the world definitely don’t read this at 16. Maybe in university. Too depressing and thematically heavy. Just giving you some perspective Victor Krum
High school professors translating novels? My teachers in Kentucky can hardly speak English. I think this goes to show how education is totally subjective throughout the country. Probably why the south is still stereotypically stupid, as well.
the south is not stereotypically stupid it is neither more intelligent or stupid than the north what it is typically is a victim of hypocrisy where the focus is on the south historically using slavery and never on the north historically using child labour which was not illegal in USA until 1938. Manufacturing used child labour agricultural used slavery no intellectual difference and no ethical one.
shona graham : your eloquence almost had me convinced... Then I used rational thought. The south is stereotyped as stupid, that is a fact, though not necessarily correct. Child labor is not morally the same as slave labor, even though both are reprehensible, because the children were paid and, presumably, worked of their own (or parents) consent. Not everything is a race issue!
Fantastic to watch shame that the student on the right keeps moving pleating her hair etc it’s just so rude when they have such a good professor infront of them
One of the students who did not do her reading assignment. As a former teacher, I recognize those type of students immediately. They never raise their hand and are doing something that can be distracting to the teacher.
@@mizcracun чувствую, как ты радуешь своё эго этими словами. Это просто жалко. Я понимаю, не всем быть Достоевскими, но какой же кринж я испытываю каждый раз от каждого подобного сообщения от моего дебильного соотечественника.
42 minutes in, brainwashed student makes the story all about the “patriarchy” so she can solidify her opinions about said patriarchy and set the stage for her current and future victimhood…and the professor goes all in with her on it. How can I read one of the greatest books ever written and reduce it down to my oppression complex which is in league with the current social narrative, score points with my professor, and show my fellow students how totally smart I am when I didn’t really read the book because I just read a feminist hit piece about it from my favorite blogger?
“The definition of an anti Semite is one who hates Jews MORE THEN IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.” I think Prof Katz said this. Strikes me as anti Semitic. Implies that if someone hates Jews only the “necessary” amount - they are NOT anti Semite. What are your thoughts on this. Just curious
If this offends you you know absolutely nothing about Jewish culture whatsoever and should therefore just shut up. There's a fat girl with blue hair out there who would love for you to take up her cause instead.
Are you saying that academics should only analyse books that represent their exact social strata? How exact? Should we have "working class fiction" classes and "middle class fiction" classes? Or are you talking sanctimonious knee-jerk horseshit?
I think the translation was perfect. Total waste of $$$. Will never read it because I have read the book at least 7 times. I actually hate people who think they are intellectuals and act like they need to interpret for me.I have my own brain thank you very much! I can interpret just fine.Not a higher level conversation like J Peterson.
If I'm not wrong he has a PhD in Russian lit from Oxford Uni. If anything, he's more of an expert than Peterson. And he's speaking to high schoolers, so I think that would explain his approach.
Yes you may be right but so many young people are so early miss lead never forming their own conclusions. This is why American will be run by socialist.
In highschool I remember being a student who couldn’t care less for English class and wouldn’t have any thought of opening a book. It’s only now I’m here wishing I could be in a classroom again like this and take in these extremely interesting notes on a book I now love and revere. Thank you for the recording of the lecture
In highschool there was an infinite number of far more interesting things happening all around you in every peer group. 90% of that is gone the second your grade is graduated and the rest of it is gone within 5 years
I feel somehow literature isn’t even meant for people that age. It is only after one has developed a certain emotional and Mental arch can they really understand the psychology behind such masterpieces.
Finished the book early last evening ...woke up in the night thinking about it...(as i have done for the past two weeks) and now at 2.51am, I just finished watching this video!
I came here because I wanted a deeper analysis of the book and when he read his excerpt, I realized that I had read the book of his translation. Thank you so much.
Pride, the Fall and Hell. (That pessimistic title would make the Epilogue even more surprising and seemingly added as an afterthought, so that the light will shine all the brighter in the darkness)
Rask keeps seeking to be rejected for who he is -- he thinks his true self is unworthy of familial love are general acceptance. He thrives on needing to be seen as hated, an outcast, a pariaih. When his love interest says she "knows" it means she knows who and what he is by nature and accepts him anyway, not just that she knows he killed the old woman.
I love when profs record their lecture and put it on UA-cam. I learned so much!
I dont think Raskolnikov ever repented genuinely for killing a person. He only repented for committing a deed which he did not have the potential to deal with. What he gives away in the end is his pride and ego. He comes down to the ground and completely accepts that he is just an ordinary person.
Bhuvanesh N I felt the same way. And I’ve re-read the last few pages in an attempt to find even a slight clue that he truly repents. While serving his time in Siberia, Raskolnikov mentions something along the lines of how he does not feel bad for the old woman. This made me feel uneasy because I felt that the book would have an “unhappy ending”. But the fact that he accepted himself as an ordinary man and let go of his pride (which crushed his soul so much that he was kneeling and sobbing in front of Sonia) was in so many ways, just as impactful; because a. it wasn’t that he was inherently bad that made him commit the crime because he clearly has empathy and goes out of his way to help others and b. in coming to terms with his normalcy, he can set aside his hyper rational thoughts and theories and lead the rest of his life without isolating himself and in doing so, he is less likely to commit further atrocities.
@@sahilnambisan2942 True ! I completely agree.
No, he didn’t repent. He felt his theory wasn’t vindicated because he had failed.
I got the impression that he didn't change his mind on the theory, just that didn't have the right to the commit it. I.e. if somebody else *worthy.. exceptional* commited the act, they would have the moral right to do so.
It might be a cliche, but I think at the end what really woke him up and brought him back to reality was the idea he could leave his own rationalisations aside and live according to somebody else's traditions and believes. Live *for* somebody else.
The point of Raskolnikov's redemption isn't being sorry for the crime. The point of his redemption is that he's a criminal but people are still able to forgive him. And that moves him so much he completely changes his outlook on life.
He still belies that his murder was rational and justifiable, but he also knows that's not enough to live his life. Love and acceptance of the society is the real foundation of the human society, not reason.
This is one of the best UA-cam videos on Dostoevsky and ‘Crime and Punishment’ I have ever watched. I’m thankful for having found it.
I am a teacher...this professor is very good....a model teacher....thank you for downloading.....
I particularly love the part where he indulges himself in the sheer entertainment of being expected to believe that a student is curious and that it is not a fashion of speech. That's a great professor.
These kids are so engaged. I wish I was this alive and awake when I was that young.
When you're a kid their job is to destroy your will to live, and then when you grow up you have to go get it again. School is terrible in the US.
"Pride and Punishment"
That's good
holy shit. i am not even that much of an believing Christian but Marmeladov's speech hit me right in the feels. Dostojewski deserves so much respect
"Dostojewski deserves so much respect" ??The man is respected from Atheists,Communists,Right wingers..the man is considered one of the greatest minds ever.
Dostojevskij was opposed to socialism, atheism and (quickly summarized) anything progressive. The crowds of people that really praise him are the christians and conservatives.
SanderAllstar : ie. The people who think. Lol
@@sanderallstar6765 Dostoyevsky was, his entire life, opposed to serfdom and he detested the landed Russian aristocracy. He was opposed to socialism because it worshiped the state and and he was opposed to capitalism because it worshiped Mammon (money). He was looking for a new kind of human community that he hoped would grow out of the Russian Orthodox Church, but he even had doubts about that. He was well-known for not getting along with Orthodox priests and he rarely went to church. In one of his last letters, he told a friend that in his next novel, which would be a continuation of The Brothers Karamazov, his saintly Alyosha would leave the church, become an anarchist, and attempt to assassinate the Tsar. Dostoyevsky a conservative? No. Dostoyevsky a liberal? No. He was looking for something new which he saw as rooted in Christ. We have only scratched the surface in really understanding Dostoyevsky.
Does an anti semite deserve respect?
This is his passion. Teach.
I definitely like the title : Crime Punishment and Penance. Loved the professor. Anytime I need psychological depth I go back to School. Professors are so refreshing!! Thank you.
How I got through highschool and college without having to read this is a conspiracy of the universe...
Right
We must protect teachers as this. One of the best books ever written, I dont think most of this students really read it
It's only as Im older, more mature and experienced in life that I can appreciate this work. Love the lecture...thank you.
So you are saying that these high school kids don't appreciate it?
I don’t think he’s saying that. It’s simply that we approach and receive/interpret great works of art differently at different stages of our life. Everyone should re-read the great works of literature(Shakespeare, Dostoevsky, etc) every 6-7 years from the age of 18 to the end of their life. They’ll discover new insights every time.. Hell, Read Hamlet, Lear, Macbeth, etc once a month from 18 to 80 and you’ll make a few thousand discoveries in them by 80..🎭🎼🙏
Oh My God...I Love This Professor And Atmospher Of The Class
Watching a teacher struggle to get participation from a group of students who didn’t read the book but watched the thug notes.
How can you say that? The interaction is great, just look at the responses to the alternative title
@@MarlboroughBlenheim1 Agreed. It seems that most of the students are genuinely interested in the novel. Obviously, Professor Katz has a much deeper understanding of the novel, but it is clear that the students appreciate his understanding and want to know more. As an English teacher, I would be more than happy with this engagement!
I understood once I realized this was a high school class and not college. It's a lot to ask for high school students to read and comprehend this entire novel. I mean, we only had to read things like Of Mice and Men or Lord of the Flies
Seems just the opposite to me. The students clearly did read the book, as evidenced by the array of questions they ask. Pretty impressive for high school, in my view.
Did we watch the same lecture?!
This dude's French and Russian accents are sick!!!
well he's studied Russian like a mad dog, considering the fact he translates such book. Maybe he's a native speaker bia his parents, anyhow the point remains.
Shapeshifting is what they do.
@@patrickleary4330 Uh...?
@@constipatedlecher jews
Repentance was alluded to throughout the entire book. The epilogue seemed very intentional to me
Marmeladov always has been my favourite character, ever since I first read/listened to this novel, and the teacher's fav scene is also probably mine. I wonder what the many mentions of horse carriages stand for in this play though.
Why do you believe madmeladov’s speech is significant? @die_schlechtere_Milch
I was dying for participating whenever this noble and charismatic teacher asked any question. I would have killed an old lady with an ax to be there listening to him face to face as if it were a dream, and I was riding a horse that would then be mutilated into pieces just as my dreams.
wtf
Leonardo Hernández
I like your vibrant mind. Highly creative. Well done.
Are you a psycopath or a necrophiliac. I would say the latter going by your flow.
Bahaha good reference!
@@lisahughes4999
He was referencing scenes from the book. Read the book.
No one seemed to understand that the proverb about Jews itself was anti-Semitic and that was the joke :/
When characters switch from good and bad isn't it partly because Dostoevsky believes in the idea that most people have a duplicitous nature? A duplicitous nature such as in his second book, The Double?
Thank you very much for uploading this!
michael kats the legend himself! mans has his book on indigo now reading this book currently on page 85, its kind of a hard read its been day 8. harder than the hunger games thts for sure.
so far from wat i c is tht raskinolkov is very poor and is in a alot of pressure so tht y hes all crazy. ye they even say tht is it the crime tht causes the mental illness or the illness tht causes the crime(i think it can b both)? thts y he wants to kill the lady cuz the dude is psycopathic and sociopathic from his time in st.petersburg, he mustve been fine when he was with his mother and sister back in his home town. idk bout the whole "superior man idea" yet cuz im only on page 84 but so far it just seems tht hes like bilpolar cuz first he said he was gonna commit the crime. then he said he wasnt cuz he had a dream about him being a child and seeing a horse get beaten to death and also said even if with an absolute assurance tht the plan was gonna go all well and he will b unscathed from the crime he wouldnt do it; he saw lizaveta who from tht he knew was going to b somewhere where her half sis(ivanova old woman) where he thought would b alone at tht time becuz of her lizaveta going somewhere, and now from knowing this he once again wants to commit this crime. seems like hes bipolar to a fault, hes desperate, and is sick and weak from his conditions.
A drunkard's path is a wandering without continuous awareness, if in fact drunk ever becomes aware of where they'd been.
"if in fact drunk ever becomes aware of where they'd been"???
so is the feeling of being drunk is personified and if drunk was a person he wouldnt want its user to b aware if he knew where they;d been.
Wow, this is a HIGH SCHOOL class? It feels more college level material.
I didn't appreciate the humor until i heard it audio. One of my top 3 all time favorite books
This is a very, very lucky High School
I read CP when I was 14, my dad's college paperback. I devoured it. I was going through my 80s slasher film phase and the book grabbed me. I would then start to read other russian novelists and find 19th century Russia identical to 21st century America. There's a passage in Dostoevsky's The Idiot where a woman screams at her son's deadbeat friends, "you think breaking into someone's home and mugging are a form of political protest!" Something like that. Shocking how today's left in the west is mimicking Russia's elites from 150 years ago.
It is now widely accepted that the 5 novel's dostoyevsky wrote (not his early work tho) are good candidates for greatest work of literature in worlds history
I Thought someone would suggest the title (Purgatory) in the beginning .
This is a high school?
gbluecheez yes! A local college professor visited our class, so this level of conversation reflects that.
@@StagingShakespeare kudos to your school for bringing a college professor. Is this practice common?
Wow he should’ve gotten paid more for this can y’all put some midrolls
Hell, could anyone explain the significance of when Raskolnikov goes to visit Sonya and forces her to read out the story of Lazarus from The Bible. I’m confused by Sonya and Raskolnikov’s reactions to this.
I think this scene foreshadows the end of the novel when love raises him out of his funk and gives him new life.
The teacher has interesting insights. I'd like to hear more of them.
title: "left to himself, I won't be back soon"
"Ушел в себя, вернусь не скоро"
Чушь..
I don’t think any of the girls in the front even read the spark notes.
Title: Accepting Ordinarity
Paul S. Good title. Thank you. And I agree.
It’s interesting about this phenomenon that some find the redemptive ending as ringing false. I suspect that those raised as Christians, and especially Catholics, would find it much more plausible than atheists or agnostics, who would be more likely to blanche or bristle at the ending. Not saying one or the other is the “right or correct” response, just more proof that amongst we humans “where you stand depends on where you sit”….🙏🎭
iam reading his translation i love it
We call it over the edge
woe is me!
Am very affected by the needless death of Elizabeth, in such a gruesome manner, for simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
More so, by Raskalinikof's attitude.
And not once does Raskalinikof care or regret that.
Hence, it is my view that Raskalinikov remains an unrepentant and dangerous man even when released after his sentence.
title; from illusion to disillusion
Rise ye Tarnished
Yep other people around the world definitely don’t read this at 16. Maybe in university. Too depressing and thematically heavy. Just giving you some perspective Victor Krum
Insanity and rehabilitation
I wish I was in this class lol I want to blurt out my answers so bad
Достоевский- великий!
кто бы мог подумать.
I suppose Ivan Denisovich is looking for his garment.
Prof Katz giving me Larry David vibes
I would give the title "Repentance" or "Split".
Maybe "The Napoleon of Saint Petersburg".
Who is Frederik (full name) ? (The one who commited crimes)...cant get the name ..(Im non-native speaker )
А? Raskolnikov first name - Radion (Радион).
Uhhh were we supposed to *not* like Raskolnikov? Ruh roh!
Shout out to my boy Lil Craycray and all my dogs in Satan's backyard at street beefs!!
The creepy sound of chalk on the blackboard might produce another raskolnikov... though i don't approve of it 😬
People plans crooked things when they gathered in a bar.
Am I right?
Именно в Преступлении и наказании - нет.)
High school professors translating novels? My teachers in Kentucky can hardly speak English. I think this goes to show how education is totally subjective throughout the country. Probably why the south is still stereotypically stupid, as well.
This guy's a professor, not the constant high school teacher. He was probably visiting.
the south is not stereotypically stupid it is neither more intelligent or stupid than the north what it is typically is a victim of hypocrisy where the focus is on the south historically using slavery and never on the north historically using child labour which was not illegal in USA until 1938. Manufacturing used child labour agricultural used slavery no intellectual difference and no ethical one.
shona graham : your eloquence almost had me convinced... Then I used rational thought. The south is stereotyped as stupid, that is a fact, though not necessarily correct. Child labor is not morally the same as slave labor, even though both are reprehensible, because the children were paid and, presumably, worked of their own (or parents) consent. Not everything is a race issue!
Undergrad Lit Review yeah never had any guest lecturers invited into my southern HS
@@kennethalbert4653 Slaves in the North and South were not paid? who much is food, clothing and shelter worth?
Martin Kimberly Robinson Ronald Perez Barbara
Thomas Elizabeth Harris David Hernandez Brenda
28:45
Fantastic to watch shame that the student on the right keeps moving pleating her hair etc it’s just so rude when they have such a good professor infront of them
One of the students who did not do her reading assignment. As a former teacher, I recognize those type of students immediately. They never raise their hand and are doing something that can be distracting to the teacher.
She's hoping a Hollywood agent is watching
Guilt after murder
Martinez Helen Clark Kimberly Moore Larry
Guilt
I was thinking of the same title. That or "Death drive"
its funny how westerners explain russian classik lit
What are the differences?
Они разбирают сюжет. Не понимая языка, разумеется. Заметь как он пытается объяснить разные понятия, разжевать.
Хотя кажется что школьники абсолютно скучают. Философия Достоевского для них пустой звук.
@@mizcracun чувствую, как ты радуешь своё эго этими словами. Это просто жалко. Я понимаю, не всем быть Достоевскими, но какой же кринж я испытываю каждый раз от каждого подобного сообщения от моего дебильного соотечественника.
@@mnemonicpie испытывай хоть по 200 раз в день. Мне то зачем сообщать об этом?
germany will retake kaliningrad. and japan will retake the kurils Sakhalin and Vladivostok.
42 minutes in, brainwashed student makes the story all about the “patriarchy” so she can solidify her opinions about said patriarchy and set the stage for her current and future victimhood…and the professor goes all in with her on it. How can I read one of the greatest books ever written and reduce it down to my oppression complex which is in league with the current social narrative, score points with my professor, and show my fellow students how totally smart I am when I didn’t really read the book because I just read a feminist hit piece about it from my favorite blogger?
Well, you would probably like to know if many people who are responsible for the spread of this nonsense have funny last names.
The joke in the beginning was full of russophobic sentiment. Couldn’t bother to watch further after that.
Prof mentioned that it was a Russian joke. Which I have never heard of in Russia though
Still one does not have to be this sensitive.
It’s just a joke. He also made a cliche out of the Frenchman.
“The definition of an anti Semite is one who hates Jews MORE THEN IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.” I think Prof Katz said this. Strikes me as anti Semitic.
Implies that if someone hates Jews only the “necessary” amount - they are NOT anti Semite.
What are your thoughts on this.
Just curious
If this offends you you know absolutely nothing about Jewish culture whatsoever and should therefore just shut up. There's a fat girl with blue hair out there who would love for you to take up her cause instead.
Because everyone is antisemitic. It's in the blood. The eternal Jew is to be hated, and God will curse those who do. The plight of a Jew.
The priviledge to anaylse and almost romanticize poverty.
Are you saying that academics should only analyse books that represent their exact social strata? How exact? Should we have "working class fiction" classes and "middle class fiction" classes? Or are you talking sanctimonious knee-jerk horseshit?
@@raskolnikov9248 I would like to be invited to share factual reality and not salarified entertainment.
"The insanity of Sin"
I think the translation was perfect. Total waste of $$$. Will never read it because I have read the book at least 7 times. I actually hate people who think they are intellectuals and act like they need to interpret for me.I have my own brain thank you very much! I can interpret just fine.Not a higher level conversation like J Peterson.
wtf r u on?
If I'm not wrong he has a PhD in Russian lit from Oxford Uni. If anything, he's more of an expert than Peterson. And he's speaking to high schoolers, so I think that would explain his approach.
Yes you may be right but so many young people are so early miss lead never forming their own conclusions. This is why American will
be run by socialist.
Правильно. Читайте на русском!
Extremely boring.
You don't read book. 100%
@@mizcracun Actually, fool, I've lost count of the times I've read thar book.... but this lecture left me needing an adrenaline shot.
In highschool I remember being a student who couldn’t care less for English class and wouldn’t have any thought of opening a book. It’s only now I’m here wishing I could be in a classroom again like this and take in these extremely interesting notes on a book I now love and revere. Thank you for the recording of the lecture
I totally and fully relate
In highschool there was an infinite number of far more interesting things happening all around you in every peer group. 90% of that is gone the second your grade is graduated and the rest of it is gone within 5 years
I feel somehow literature isn’t even meant for people that age. It is only after one has developed a certain emotional and Mental arch can they really understand the psychology behind such masterpieces.
I just finished reading the novel and I am happy to have found this video, which I'm watching at 02 o'clock after midnight
Finished the book early last evening ...woke up in the night thinking about it...(as i have done for the past two weeks) and now at 2.51am, I just finished watching this video!
I came here because I wanted a deeper analysis of the book and when he read his excerpt, I realized that I had read the book of his translation. Thank you so much.
Sin and guilt
"Playing God" would be my title
Why doesnt noone ever mention the policeman in the tavern pretty much saying it would be fine for the old woman to die?
wow I wish I was in this lecture
Didn't he translate this book?
Yes, he did!
Pride, the Fall and Hell. (That pessimistic title would make the Epilogue even more surprising and seemingly added as an afterthought, so that the light will shine all the brighter in the darkness)
Rask keeps seeking to be rejected for who he is -- he thinks his true self is unworthy of familial love are general acceptance. He thrives on needing to be seen as hated, an outcast, a pariaih. When his love interest says she "knows" it means she knows who and what he is by nature and accepts him anyway, not just that she knows he killed the old woman.
Changing a hair twice in an hour. Seriously? So bored?
The artist who painted the masterpiece of course was…ITALIAN. 🎩
I am in love with the lecturer and the girl who wears a Tahoe dress.
titles I came up with on the short notice: the Perfect crime?, the Deed, Soul sacrifice.
by god he chose a weird scene to be his favourite; there are dozens of better scenes..
5:20 what happened with the rest of the book?
Excellence and repentance
Why Excellence? Because of Sonja?
I didn't know Klaus Schwab is such a good lecturer
after repenting in Sibiria, you will own nothing, and you will be happy.
Wow I loved that scene to I wish I was there as a student they had a great opportunity there that they missed.
Come prepared and give a lecture!
The pretty girl in the center of the front row adjusts her hair around 20 times..... enjoyed the lecture! Thanks for sharing