1976 SPACE SHUTTLE SYSTEM OVERVIEW ENTERPRISE ROLLOUT SIMULATED MISSION PROFILE XD70455
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @periscopefilm
Want to learn more about Periscope Film and get access to exclusive swag? Join us on Patreon. Visit / periscopefilm
Visit our website www.PeriscopeFilm.com
This short film from 1976 introduces the Space Shuttle and shows the rollout of the orbiter Enterprise, ship #101. The rollout shown was on September 17, 1976. At 1:00, a quick montage shows steps in building the shuttle components, followed by views of the Dryden Flight Center near Lancaster, California where the set-up for glide tests is nearly complete. NASA's director of Space Shuttle Operations Isaac T. Gillam IV comments about the status of the 747 to be used in the glide tests. (Gillam was director of Dryden [now Armstrong] Flight Research Center, NASA’s major field center for the flight testing of high speed aircraft and experimental vehicles in Edwards, California.) At 1:49, the first crew of astronauts are shown: Joe Engle, Dick Truly, Fred Hayes and Gordon Fullerton. Fullerton comments about the Space Shuttle's mission profile while simulations show how the Shuttle will deliver payloads into orbit and return to Earth in a glide. At 3:14, an astronaut uses a simulator as part of training. At 3:36, more footage of the Enterprise from the rollout ceremony (this portion of the film has heavy water damage).
Motion picture films don't last forever; many have already been lost or destroyed. For almost two decades, we've worked to collect, scan and preserve the world as it was captured on 35mm, 16mm and 8mm movies -- including home movies, industrial films, and other non-fiction. If you have endangered films you'd like to have scanned, or wish to donate celluloid to Periscope Film so that we can share them with the world, we'd love to hear from you. Contact us via the weblink below.
This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFi...
I remember those Flight and landing tests of the Enterprise summer of 77. Being broadcast on tv....thats how special the Space shuttle was at the time.
If you want something somewhat similar and reminiscent of that era... know that there is a company called Boom Technology currently designing a new supersonic airliner. They have permission from the FAA to go supersonic over the United States, and expect supersonic flight of a one-third-scale model by the end of this year. 35 firm orders from American and United Airlines. Expected to enter commercial service in 5-6 years.
@@sturmovik1274
Sounds cool, I'll have to keep check with that.👍
lucky you got this film in time.
Howd this comment get left a month ago
End part has seen better days.
@@choossuck7653👀🤔
@@choossuck7653
*This proves it.*
_My entire life is a lie!!!_
3:45 Leonard Nimoy and DeForest Kelley
Great post!!!!! Thank you!
Ah, this is the occasion where the original Star Trek crew/cast took a photo in front of Enterprise.
Major Dharma Initiative orientation video production vibes.
If you want something somewhat similar and reminiscent of that era... know that there is a company called Boom Technology currently designing a new supersonic airliner. They have permission from the FAA to go supersonic over the United States, and expect supersonic flight of a one-third-scale model by the end of this year. 35 firm orders from American and United Airlines. Expected to enter commercial service in 5-6 years.
Not the arm, it’s the CANADA ARM…
0:50 "... nearly completed spacecraft." No wonder I was confused as a kid having seen Enterprise on the news with glide & landing tests and then a few years later hearing about the delays due to the tiles.
Maybe this is where Musk learned the art of overselling?
Must have used some of that hi tech space film.
I love the psyop
Thanks man, I dig your psyop too
You ever shave those porkchop sideburns off?
Back when you could trust boeing....
D'oh!! @03:44 Was that Nimoy there, toward the end? Now, I "get" the connection with naming conventions etc., but what does a real life actor have ANYthing to do, in relation, with a real life space craft? OTHER than just basic psychological manipulation and mind-foo@kery, that is?! XD I'd have thought that a real life aeronautical engineer or "astrophysicist" would have a better real life impact over an "everybody knows this face" actor?? Then again, probably not... Interesting, to say the least.
Great find!! : ) Thanks for sharing.
I think having popular culture involved in science makes it more appealing to the general public. It was named Enterprise as a result of a letter writing campaign to NASA back in the day.
@@RickTheGeek Yeah, that's about it. Now let's just take the next, progressive step in that line of thinking. That's about where I think I left off. Because something as mind-blowing and phenomenal as "space travel," isn't really "appealing" enough!? Sure! That ALMOST doesn't track. : / They just had to "sell" it THAT much more... Right!? And which audience are they targeting in this instance anyway? The ones who already think sci-fi is lowbrow hogwash, or the ones that have already bought into the premise and already associate this Nimoy character with "space" already? One is a crap shoot and the other is simply doubling down on a sure bet and solidifying the ideal and image into their collective conscious. So again, back to my initial and assessment above.
As for the name-game thing, I think that was prefaced and touched on above also. But sure, why not!? : ) Thanks for your input an RE. Always appreciated.
@@RickTheGeekYou are correct. Before the write in campaign, it was originally supposed to be called the Constitution.
The space shuttle shpuld be remembered as a complete failure, it has very limited capabilities, it killed more astronauts than any other launch vehicle and while it was designed to be cheap it had a per launch cost nearly equal to the saturn V dispite economies of scale.
that has to be the Single Most-Ignorant comment ever posted on UA-cam !!
- - Bravo !! !!
@TheAlabamaWildman False. The shuttle program failed at everything it set out to do.
-It was the most expensive way to put anything into orbit
- Extremely dangerous with 1 of every 90 launches ending in disaster and several more near misses
-Could only go to low earth orbit
-Delays in the program caused skylab to de-orbit
People think that it was some sort of engineering marvel because of how obscenely complex it was but as an engineer I can assure you that complexity is not a virtue and insane shit like 30,000 unique tiles that take 30 hours each to replace is unbelievably wastefull that only the government would go along with it.
@@mbox314: what is your alternative for the tiles ?
@brianw338 For the heat shield tiles I would cancle the entire shuttle program. The requirements were all wrong, and the program was doomed from the beginning.
the shuttle walked so that starship could run
*fail. Fify
@@LuciFeric137 cope
@@leisureenjoyer1986 hey genius. Billionaires are not your friends. Spit or swallow?
Fred Hayes - Apollo 13
Spelled "Haise" - the "Hayes" you're thinking of is a brand of computer modem. Both very influential names!
@RickTheGeek Thank you, Mr. Autocorrect. I'd be more impressed if you had noticed and mentioned it first.