Why does everyone hate Hitler? I only watched 10 minutes of one of his speaches, but I didn't see anything of why he was supposedly a terrible person. I mean he was against smoking and pro universal healthcare! I've also heard that he ate suger! But wait, the Nazis also ate suger, was Hitler a Nazi?
As opposed to this clown who, when lacking any intelligent opposing ideas, simply dismisses the entire argument as unimportant or boring. Race/IQ is the third rail of arguments, and this goofball wants to dismiss it as boring. Sure, buddy.
What you dumbasses can't understand is that she was defending free speech, whether from a dumbass like Alex Jones or a dumbass like you or AOC. ¿Hello?
K. Martin she was defending free speech? She just admitted she doesn’t even know what he said lmao.... Alex Jones accused people of being crisis actors with no evidence after their children were murdered... he violated TOC and the law.... that ain’t free speech numb nuts.
But youtube is private service, you sign away all your rights when sign up to their TOCs, and if you dont like it go find another service, or even better make your own. Private companies doing what they want is literally what the USA is about, why is it now a problem?
To her, that's true, so she's not lying. Like when a child says their Daddy is the smartest man on earth....they don't know any better because they have no working intellect themselves.
Lol, I mean on any level do you think they're trolling us? NO ONE can be that dumb. Or perhaps they know how dumb they are and how much this antagonises actual bright people...and so they do this to annoy us?
That's one of the worst thing that people say. Down play there intelligence it's a copout so they dont have to stand by what they say. "Im ignorant" than stfu. Cringey 😂😂
Owens: "We are so tired of you calling yourself a classical liberal!" Me: "Agreed. Wow! I can't she said something smart fo-" Owens: "You are too practical and too smart" Me: "And I rescind that compliment..."
I've seen some of his comedy. It's complete shit. There are no jokes, he's just punching down, and comedy is always about punching up at ridiculousness.
"If we sat here long enough I could get you to admit you're a classical liberal." If you sat there long enough, you could get Candace to admit she's a siamese cat.
The scary part is he just may do that if being gay and conservative stops working. He may have to go with the conservative wet dream, I have seen the light, and Jesus blah blah. Then just like that I no longer liked dick, not even my own. I can see it happening easily if his finance$ dictate it.
Honestly, I was thinking they might wipe the table clear and just start fucking at any moment. She practically had her tongue up his ass, the way she was sucking up to him.
Also can we acknowledge that the “vodka in the coffee cup” bit is straight up stolen from Seth MacFarlane? Not only is he a grifter, but he’s a bit biter too! P.S. it’s a hacky bit, too...
@Skeptical Slim Sorry for the text wall, but I wanted to give you an honest answer. Excuse any typos--I only read back over it quickly. Like anything, it depends on the context. In the case of "nationalism," the range of contexts in which its neutral or positive is fairly narrow. I guess an example would be when someone is using it synonymously with "patriotism," which is relatively benign if you're talking about pride in your system of governance, constitution, and so on. Unfortunately, that particular context is the exception to the rule. Nationalism, as an ideology, arose in reference to the historical concept of a "nation" and and "nation-state," in contrast with "empire" (a state composed of various nations/ethnicities, often ruled by one of those groups). One reason it's controversial is its role in sparking the worst wars of the last few centuries, but I'll focus on another related and even more controversial aspect. So, the move toward nationalism in the 19th-20th Century in Europe was, at least in its original context, a move toward the self-governance of the continent's cultural, language, or ethnic groups; either through the dissolution of empires like the Austro-Hungarian Empire or union of a number of states dominated by one of these groups into a single unit, like the German Reich. A "nation-state," in this original sense, is a particular nation's state. Jews, for instance, were long considered a nation without a state. So for most of history (and, arguably, in most cases today), the term has been inextricably linked to notions of one's people, whether ethnic or cultural, as distinct from, and often in opposition to, other groups. Some examples might be French or Hungarian nationalism. That's why it isn't an exact synonym for the word patriotism: it has all this excess baggage. It may be used as such in the US, despite its multiethnic population, because it came of age as a country during this rise of nationalism and Americans have come to define themselves as one nation of people. Anyway, the original concept has been particularly important in German history because for most of their history Germans were spread throughout the countless feudal states of the Holy Roman Empire, and when there was a push toward a unified German state in the 19th Century, the effort was heavily influenced and motivated by nationalism in this linguistic/cultural/ethnic sense. This was carried into the 20th Century, intensified by their defeat in WWI, and radicalized during the ensuing interwar period. This, combined with race issues in other countries, like the US, led to a strand of nationalism that focused less on statehood and territory, and more on ethnicity (like "white-nationalism"). So, whether nationalism is a "dirty word," depends on context, but it's clear that PragerU is playing on its controversial history when he titles his video, "Why you Should be a Nationalist". He may be using it in its more benign sense, but "patriotism" is actually the more exact term and has the benefit of not being associated with the worst excesses of humanity. Though I guess he wouldn't be pissing off liberals or whatever if he did that.
imagine having ancestors, who were kidnapped and enslaved for generations for centuries, or were hated, alienated and discriminated against for time immemorial, who fought tooth and nail to just be treated as fellow human beings, and you just taking a steaming dump all over it. just. wow.
Where did she ever say that you fucking idiot. I am guessing this is why a TV star beat your asses in elections. Such bullshit and dishonest virtue signaling! Anyhow you have more years of Trump to lose your minds over. These echo chambers are ridiculous!
Wait. Isn't Dave about the free market of ideas?? Why is he condescending to any ideas? He's cool with talking to Nazis, but having a debate about transsexual people is over the line??
5 років тому+23
If these two fools were electro-shocked every time they launched into a straw-man argument, they'd be silent forever.
Well look at all the shitty stuff that conservative presidents have done since Nixon. It's no wonder the party is dying and has to resort to so many under handed tactics to remain viable.
Women athletes competing against trans women have an unfair disadvantage. And it’s not a minor issue as you claim. These women athletes lose scholarships, lose opportunities to study at good universities, and they lose the recognition and prize money (from which they make a living) that they deserve. Sorry David, but you have no idea what you’re talking about.
So what? Has she no freedom of speech? Only Libtards have freedom of speech to spread evil communism that had caused 100 million innocent deaths directly around the world in the past century?
He changed everything he believed in because he never believed in liberal values strongly in the first place. The only thing he believes in is getting money and going where the money is.
I kind of have a thing for Natalie from contrapoints. I mean, I wouldn't mind having her above me, but if Dave's right then this means her dominance is now our left-wing intersectional party line. All hail our dark mother!
8:00 - 8:45 The problem with it is that "Men identifying as women and then stepping in the ring and beating the living shit out of women" is exactly the kind of issue that develops when you decide to accept something on a societal level before determining the consequences of doing so. What are the rules? Thats the question that is trying to be raised here and "its not important and we'll figure it out later" is a totally reckless response that would have any normal person alarmed
I mean I know that TPUSA goes to various colleges which are liberal and battle liberal ideas. But I think you have a very good point, I have a feeling Owens wouldn't dare go into a room full of black folks that disagree with her.
In fairness, the trans sport debate is an important for someone like me. I work in Sport and it’s going to become a reality in our industry very soon. Rightly or wrongly, this DOES need to be discussed
I really think people should stop entertaining candace Owen. All black stars should not respond to anything she says. Or try to say what she said is wrong. Just leave her to do her bashing .
His point that transgender men->women competing in sports is not a big issue may be right from an abstract level, but it's still an issue and if you have had concrete experience of it then it's going to seem like a much bigger issue to you. That's human nature and pointing to statistics simply isn't going to change that fact That's why I admit, progressivism is a positive standpoint, conservatism a negative one. By which I mean that if you haven't experienced an issue then it's very easy to be positive about it and be willing to change things 'for the better'. If however you've really experienced an issue in your life, and seen its negative effects, you're much more likely to be conservative regarding it. This is the number one reason people become more conservative as they age, because they've simply accumulated more experience. Only people who sit in their basements pontificating about them online stay progressive, and even they become conservatives compared to the next generation of progressives coming up.
@@zootsoot2006 Lmao imagine thinking "that one WNBA player that was really good is worse than any NBA player. Leftists will disagree with me. Leftists don't like to talk about biological realities" is a good point. He made up an imaginary debate about female basketball that doesn't even matter and literally nobody cares about
That is funny ... perhaps the should chat about the biological realities of him and his husband. Am sure the assholes who write his talking points have plenty of old material they can dust off.
If these "converts" didn't feel the need to show how much of sellout they are, i don't think what they would appear that often on pakmans or progressives radar
@David Packman I understand the whole biological male/transwoman issues isn't “important” from a “widespread issue” standpoint, but it's definitely essential for things like female college sports scholarships and overall professional sports competition as a female. Imagine the WNBA with a significant number of biological males playing? Put that dynamic into ANY women's sport and it becomes a problem very quickly. I personally have no qualms with men doing it, but then competing professionally or even at an amateur level in physical sports against women would be detrimental. Think about vice verse...women competing in the NBA...or competing against men in track and field. Sorry, but you just don't see it because there is a particular physical advantage to males that most women cannot overcome.
I'm center right. I come to this channel to get good, unbiased perspective from someone on the left. Sometimes I think I do, sometimes I think I don't. Regardless, it's amazing how many people will jump on the bandwagon for or against someone without doing a shred of investigation on their own.
Ohey, I'm center left and came here from Sargon. I have a rule that I only follow political youtubers that don't censor comment, which in my experience are much more rare than center or right channels.
The sad thing about Candace is that I'm not sure she came to her opinions on her own. I always get the vibe she is almost reading of a script and when you ask somthing in a way that her script doesnt account for you get really awkward moments.
I've been applying for jobs like crazy here in London. Not much luck. I'm also a socialist. I feel like of I moved to LA and sold out *hard* I could make a fortune and be back in time for brexit. It's sorely tempting.
I saw the short abridged version on PV, cant sit through that whole garbage. Well there goes David Pakman's invitation to be on the Rubin Report 😄 "You're too smart" so Candace Owens is a comedian now?
The point is that in a free society we need freedom of speech. The Constitution understands this. And are social media publishers or platforms? They claim to be platforms but they are acting like they can govern what people say.
She seems like that friend you used to have who was alright and fun enough to be with, but too thick to have any meaningful conversations or debates with
"I've never watched Candice's show." "I watched it for the first time yesterday." "She is a FOE FOE INTELECTUAL", even though I've never watched her show but you watched it for the first time yesterday. Big Brain shit right here.
"Classical liberalism is very right wing"? Classical liberalism is moderately left wing. The only way you can come to the conclusion that it's very right wing, is if you're so far left everything looks like the right.
There is a difference between the classical definition of Liberalism and "CLassical Liberalism". CLassical Liberalism is what we now call Libertarianism in the US. Some Europeans and Americans use the term Classical Liberal, the americans do it in order to not have any connection or perceived allegiance to the Libertarian Party I assume, IDK. I myself am a Liberal in the traditional american sense but, hates the Democratic party and has little in common with anyone who calls themselves Liberals, or the right would call a "libtard".
Black Brit you can't fix that mess with all the brands at Sephora and a contour lesson from Kim K herself. Some faces require synthetics, airbrushing, and post editing touchups to even get close to producing a likeable image. No amount of filters or Photoshop can help Candace. Bitch is ugly to the bone
I was of a similar opinion pertaining to trans women competing against afab (assigned female at birth) people, until I saw the way my wife lost her strength when she started her HRT. This prompted me to look into the actual science, and I found that HRT does make an amab (assigned male at birth) person more similar in physical capacity to afab people than other amab people who are not doing through HRT. Looking further, women's sports that have allowed trans women on HRT to complete, including the Olympics, have not seen trans women dominating them.
That's not all because if they were referring to who I think they were the person they were talking about wasn't amab but actually the opposite. And they actually wanted to wrestle as a male but the school denied them because said school agreed with them about that "biological reality"(Which totally isn't really just race realism but re-framed to include LGBT people as well) shit they were talking about.
@@SOMEGUY7893 I remember that case, but I don't think that's what was being referred to here. As far as I can tell, there is zero even flimsy reason to restrict trans guys to women's competitions.
@@nateslovebug I don't know, them talking about a chokehold and Dave mentioning that he "saw it in the picture"and such makes me think their talking about him. And still repeating the misinformation/lie that they were born male and not the other way around.
@@SOMEGUY7893 It might be that they don't know what a trans man or woman is and are conflating the two. That both would baffle, yet wouldn't surprise me.
I also agree its low hanging fruit to talk about males competing in female sports. Its obviously clear males have an upper hand in the strength department. But with that said, two things. One, certain cities are allowing this (abcnews.go.com/US/transgender-teens-outrun-track-field-competitors-critics-close/story?id=55856294) and so it does raise the questions, "how far can this go? If you pander to this then why not whatever comes next?" I think thats a fair concern. Or the MMA fighter, Fallon Fox, who just brutally destroys women in the octagon. And it is this line of thinking on the left that permits these things to happen. And two, its good to know Pakman agrees with this! I honestly wouldn't know unless he said that so to me its not as clearly obvious as he is stating. But look, thats why I am here... and not in my echo chamber on the right.
conservatives say liberals are stupid and ridiculous. liberals say conservatives are stupid and ridiculous. it's a red team vs. blue team mentality. both have views that can be supported. i'm interested in content that addresses ideas rather than name-calling. i check in with david packman evey once in a while hoping to see that, and when i do, i will watch more consistently.
When Joe Rogan took her apart on climate change was hilarious. She was clueless.
Emma Shalliker yeah that was good. I like candace more than not but she was lost in that segment.
I actually think he was very soft on her cos that interview was really absurd. My brain definitely lost some cells watching it
Manmade Climate Change is a HOAX.
@@l.rongardner2150 pretty cringe to make such a statement without being funded by the fossil fuel industry
@@l.rongardner2150 lol yeah big windmill propaganda amirite? Climate science denial certainly isnt pushed by fossil fuel lobbies or anything.......
Rave Dubin talks about talking about ideas more often than he actually talks about ideas.
He talks about the idea of talking about ideas.
Kinda hard to generate ideas when you have the brain capacity of a flea.
God you're right
LLK III THIS
Exactly
She called. Dave Rubin. A *wealth of knowledge.*
I can't even.
Level 1000 cringe.
I heard he's particularly savy and nuanced with building regulations.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Compared to a puddle a bath tub looks deep. She probably does think he's smart.
The best reference she could come up with was psychedelic drugs! Lol
Why does everyone hate Hitler? I only watched 10 minutes of one of his speaches, but I didn't see anything of why he was supposedly a terrible person. I mean he was against smoking and pro universal healthcare!
I've also heard that he ate suger! But wait, the Nazis also ate suger, was Hitler a Nazi?
so much insight in your commentary :)
HAhahahahaha! Nice parallel
hahahahaahhaahahahhaha
... and he built Germany's highways ...
I like how the replies are so retarded
Dave Rubin, the free speech warrior blocks anyone who dares challenge him in the battlefield of ideas on Twitter
I'm proudly blocked by Dave Rubin!
Which he and every other "anti"-SJW used to criticise " SJWs" for *all the time* , how ironic.
As opposed to this clown who, when lacking any intelligent opposing ideas, simply dismisses the entire argument as unimportant or boring. Race/IQ is the third rail of arguments, and this goofball wants to dismiss it as boring. Sure, buddy.
Still waiting for him to speak up for government crackdown on the Left or the democratic rights of prisoners
candace: "you're like totally a wealth of knowledge" YIKES
She defended Alex Jones while admitting to not knowing anything about him....
That is why Candace deserves nothing but ridicule.
What you dumbasses can't understand is that she was defending free speech, whether from a dumbass like Alex Jones or a dumbass like you or AOC. ¿Hello?
Chronic misinformation /doesn’t/deserve protection when it’s on the platforms of private companies.
K. Martin she was defending free speech? She just admitted she doesn’t even know what he said lmao....
Alex Jones accused people of being crisis actors with no evidence after their children were murdered... he violated TOC and the law.... that ain’t free speech numb nuts.
You are a fucking idiot she defends the right of people and free speech
But youtube is private service, you sign away all your rights when sign up to their TOCs, and if you dont like it go find another service, or even better make your own. Private companies doing what they want is literally what the USA is about, why is it now a problem?
The best part is when Owens tells Rubin that he's a wealth of knowledge LOOOOL
To her, that's true, so she's not lying. Like when a child says their Daddy is the smartest man on earth....they don't know any better because they have no working intellect themselves.
Oh god I saw that and almost barfed, loool.
@Lakers fan that's actually one of the less moronic things Rubin has said. Still moron though.
My mind immediately jumped to the time he was on Joe Rogan and made a complete and total fool of himself.
@@robschroeder8297 "... Competition will start kicking in ..." The post office part right? LOL
"You're like a fountain of knowledge."
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Well, a pea brain must seem big to a brain the size of a grain of sand.
It's not about size, it's about how you use it.
That's when truly unadulterated cringe stung my body and soul.
Lol, I mean on any level do you think they're trolling us? NO ONE can be that dumb. Or perhaps they know how dumb they are and how much this antagonises actual bright people...and so they do this to annoy us?
This was like a competition to see who was the bigger sellout.
@Lakers fan doesn't matter as long as you can say "see they agree with my views"
Competition kicking in!
I'm going with Rubin, who seems to still be riding the "I swear I'm on the left even though I only interview and agree with conservatives" grift.
@@globaldigitaldirectsubsidi4493 priceless.
Not sure if they both won or if we all lost or if its all of the above
"You're a classical liberal!"
"No, you're a classical liberal!"
"No, you're a classical liberal!"
etc
Just give me ten more minutes lol
Today classical liberal is not the center-right of the political spectrum.
🤪
So cringeworthy.
Lmao
The only true statement from Candace Owens here is in 5:27 "I'm ignorant" and Rubin agrees "yeah".
hilarious
Also “I’m a 29 year old girl” - she doesn’t refer to herself as a woman. So on point.
I thought the only true statement was when he said Cynthia Cooper would be a scrub in the NBA, fact's although she was a great wnba player
That's one of the worst thing that people say. Down play there intelligence it's a copout so they dont have to stand by what they say. "Im ignorant" than stfu. Cringey 😂😂
Owens: "We are so tired of you calling yourself a classical liberal!"
Me: "Agreed. Wow! I can't she said something smart fo-"
Owens: "You are too practical and too smart"
Me: "And I rescind that compliment..."
I can hear Michael Brooks laughing
Well yeah, he's sitting right behind David's backdrop, on the the set of Majority Report w/Sam Seder. ;P
@@racineg33 lol - good one!
@@racineg33 (>_
Lol he's such a savage i love it
You can hear a lot of people laughing.
They both talk kind of like ppl who studied smart people to learn what being smart “sounds like” but didn’t realize that you also have to be smart
Dave and Candace have sold their souls to the marketplace of ideas.
And what great ideas they have. Let's keep everything as it is. No change, no improvement. What a great idea. Conservatism is intellectual laziness.
Well it’s worth a few years of cash
TRUE 🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️
@@ThisguyQuake ua-cam.com/video/Q4GJoauIJbw/v-deo.html dave kock rubin exposed
@@9inchnail how is telling blacks to not continue voting 90% Democrat Everytime just because trying to stay the same? That's the exact opposite
RIP Michael Brooks..... We lost a great intellectual who tried to make the world a better place.
I disagreed with him on practically everything, but I agree. Seemed like a great, smart guy.
Signed - a legit classical liberal
Calling Dave Rubin a "cultural critic" is way too nice.
Jak Mar I mean cultural critic is barely a half step above paparazzo in the information media landscape
This is the opposite of the recent BBC interview with Ben Shapiro. All Rubin does is stroke his guests egos for clicks.
That interview is a classic! 😂 ✌
Dave Rubin's best joke is when he refers to himself as a comedian.
Yeah that's a hilarious joke.
I've seen some of his comedy. It's complete shit. There are no jokes, he's just punching down, and comedy is always about punching up at ridiculousness.
phanatic215 no, comedy doesn’t have to punch in any direction. Dave Rubin just sucks at comedy full stop.
"Are there any straight people in the audience? Are there any conservatives in the audience? How many of you own televisions?..."
@@samb8744 there are no jokes. He's just taking
"If we sat here long enough I could get you to admit you're a classical liberal."
If you sat there long enough, you could get Candace to admit she's a siamese cat.
With an actual brain.
*If he paid her enough.
Love ur comment. Lol
Love it. I make dad jokes all the time and I'm 33 and childless.
I'm just waiting for Dave to come out as a straight man and blame the left for making him gay all in the marketplace of ideas
bahaha this is comment of the year for me
Hey! It's Luke Skywalker! I loved you in The Last Jedi.
The scary part is he just may do that if being gay and conservative stops working. He may have to go with the conservative wet dream, I have seen the light, and Jesus blah blah. Then just like that I no longer liked dick, not even my own.
I can see it happening easily if his finance$ dictate it.
Honestly, I was thinking they might wipe the table clear and just start fucking at any moment. She practically had her tongue up his ass, the way she was sucking up to him.
And she needs to come out as a white woman with re-vitaligo
"Too smart to be liberal!?" You mean like leftists Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein?
I always thought Candace Owens was just Dave Rubin in blackface.
Lmao
Baby Thanos ask Obama
Make up department on point
@Baby Thanos Coming from the one who watches Stefan Molyneux and Mark Collette, who is a Nazi? Hilarious
@Baby Thanos Clinton wasn't left wing dumbass, she's a corporate Dem
Also can we acknowledge that the “vodka in the coffee cup” bit is straight up stolen from Seth MacFarlane? Not only is he a grifter, but he’s a bit biter too!
P.S. it’s a hacky bit, too...
I’m convinced Dave Rubin doesn’t have a single idea of his own.
Jesus David. Disclaimer please.
Some of us have a weak stomach to this level of cringe. Watch at your own risk, the cringe level is over 9000.
Nice one bro!
It's even higher than that. It is on Super Saiyan levels of cringe.
Scouters will have imbedded metal in peoples skulls.
Its hella high
@@PaullyRobots you're hella high.
PragerU has a video titled, "Why you Should be a Nationalist." Charming.
What’s wrong with loving your country?
@Skeptical Slim Sorry for the text wall, but I wanted to give you an honest answer. Excuse any typos--I only read back over it quickly. Like anything, it depends on the context. In the case of "nationalism," the range of contexts in which its neutral or positive is fairly narrow. I guess an example would be when someone is using it synonymously with "patriotism," which is relatively benign if you're talking about pride in your system of governance, constitution, and so on. Unfortunately, that particular context is the exception to the rule. Nationalism, as an ideology, arose in reference to the historical concept of a "nation" and and "nation-state," in contrast with "empire" (a state composed of various nations/ethnicities, often ruled by one of those groups). One reason it's controversial is its role in sparking the worst wars of the last few centuries, but I'll focus on another related and even more controversial aspect. So, the move toward nationalism in the 19th-20th Century in Europe was, at least in its original context, a move toward the self-governance of the continent's cultural, language, or ethnic groups; either through the dissolution of empires like the Austro-Hungarian Empire or union of a number of states dominated by one of these groups into a single unit, like the German Reich. A "nation-state," in this original sense, is a particular nation's state. Jews, for instance, were long considered a nation without a state. So for most of history (and, arguably, in most cases today), the term has been inextricably linked to notions of one's people, whether ethnic or cultural, as distinct from, and often in opposition to, other groups. Some examples might be French or Hungarian nationalism. That's why it isn't an exact synonym for the word patriotism: it has all this excess baggage. It may be used as such in the US, despite its multiethnic population, because it came of age as a country during this rise of nationalism and Americans have come to define themselves as one nation of people. Anyway, the original concept has been particularly important in German history because for most of their history Germans were spread throughout the countless feudal states of the Holy Roman Empire, and when there was a push toward a unified German state in the 19th Century, the effort was heavily influenced and motivated by nationalism in this linguistic/cultural/ethnic sense. This was carried into the 20th Century, intensified by their defeat in WWI, and radicalized during the ensuing interwar period. This, combined with race issues in other countries, like the US, led to a strand of nationalism that focused less on statehood and territory, and more on ethnicity (like "white-nationalism"). So, whether nationalism is a "dirty word," depends on context, but it's clear that PragerU is playing on its controversial history when he titles his video, "Why you Should be a Nationalist". He may be using it in its more benign sense, but "patriotism" is actually the more exact term and has the benefit of not being associated with the worst excesses of humanity. Though I guess he wouldn't be pissing off liberals or whatever if he did that.
Vs ..why you should be a socialist
.its short cuz there is no reason
adam grigsby Socialism is the truly greedy selfish kind who don’t want to work for anything. Total pussies
Leo Alexander So in other words... it is Charming!!! 🎉
So I take it Dave and David aren't friends anymore? lol
TheSpeakerbox123 were they ever?
Dave has thrown out all his lefty friends, he won't even speak to them in private anymore.
imagine having ancestors, who were kidnapped and enslaved for generations for centuries, or were hated, alienated and discriminated against for time immemorial, who fought tooth and nail to just be treated as fellow human beings, and you just taking a steaming dump all over it. just. wow.
Dave Rubin is "a wealth of knowledge".
Oh... 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😊🤣
I never laughed so hard.
Ow. It hurts.
The worst thing is that to her, he is exactly that😂
@@thedondeluxe6941 Well, a pea brain must seem big to a brain the size of a grain of sand.
Dave Rubin is no ally to the LGBT+ community. He's sold his humanity and compassion to corporate interests. Its infuriating and saddening.
Dave "Liberals bad, money good" Rubin-Koch
I'm pretty sure Candace Owens is also in it for the money.
Established 2017
I pronounce Koch “Cock”
David, you made a falsehood: you referred to PragerU as a university
Candice: Ya all know something, Hitler wasn't that bad.
Dennis Prager: Ya know who ought to have a show? You!
Where did she ever say that you fucking idiot. I am guessing this is why a TV star beat your asses in elections. Such bullshit and dishonest virtue signaling! Anyhow you have more years of Trump to lose your minds over. These echo chambers are ridiculous!
@Rob Rich don't use that strawman. Prager is a Jew.
@Great Lakes so politicians lie but somehow you feel yours don't. Then proceed to attack people because of the same politicians. Cut the bullshit!
"Cringeworthy" is an understatement... sophistry is the perfect way to describe this.
Cringe-inducing is more accurate.
Glad you've created a video for this s**t show. Let's watch and laugh at it lol
I love her set. They took 10 minutes and ran through IKEA picking out stock photos of European street scenes and tacky curtains.
Will Dave give a David a 0/10 on Yelp for this video?
And a new more profitable Rubin will take his place
LOL!!!!!
David deserves a 0 for being completely blind to the rhetoric coming from the left, dismissing it all as a strawman
5:23 ‘I’m ignorant’
Thx for admitting that Candace
I can't wait for that IQ debate on her show.
Candace is in the "Sunken Place" and likes it.
@J I see her delusions are growing.
Wait. Isn't Dave about the free market of ideas?? Why is he condescending to any ideas? He's cool with talking to Nazis, but having a debate about transsexual people is over the line??
If these two fools were electro-shocked every time they launched into a straw-man argument, they'd be silent forever.
A.H Man we should test that theory.... I'll bring a tens unit.... And an electric chair
They are grifters. Liberal comes from liberty. Liberty is about freedom which is something good.
I love how right-wingers spent 40 years turning "liberal" into a dirty word and now it's making them choke on their own rhetoric.
lol what? Have you seen how liberals react when you even hint that you may be a conservative? Especially on college campuses?
Well look at all the shitty stuff that conservative presidents have done since Nixon. It's no wonder the party is dying and has to resort to so many under handed tactics to remain viable.
lol nah y’all did that to yourself
@@charles125 They aren't liberals then. Plain and simple
Women athletes competing against trans women have an unfair disadvantage. And it’s not a minor issue as you claim. These women athletes lose scholarships, lose opportunities to study at good universities, and they lose the recognition and prize money (from which they make a living) that they deserve. Sorry David, but you have no idea what you’re talking about.
some people just don't have morals
candence literally admits she doesn't know what she is talking about, and still keep talking
So what? Has she no freedom of speech? Only Libtards have freedom of speech to spread evil communism that had caused 100 million innocent deaths directly around the world in the past century?
@@stupidben999 LMFAO. You need to lay off the paint chips.
@@stupidben999 jesus fucking christ what does communism have to do with any of this? why are you like this?
" the parties never switched ideologies! "- every conservative
" explain classical liberalism "- me, thanks to Dave Rubin
How do you change everything you believe in , just because a liberal made you cry once ?
Daniel Harvey IV wait who made him cry lmao?
He changed everything he believed in because he never believed in liberal values strongly in the first place. The only thing he believes in is getting money and going where the money is.
The way Dave Rubin laughs is so creepy
I kind of have a thing for Natalie from contrapoints. I mean, I wouldn't mind having her above me, but if Dave's right then this means her dominance is now our left-wing intersectional party line. All hail our dark mother!
Black Brit Right there with you re Contrapoints. I wonder if Natalie could be talked into a "twofer"? Cheers doll!
8:00 - 8:45 The problem with it is that "Men identifying as women and then stepping in the ring and beating the living shit out of women" is exactly the kind of issue that develops when you decide to accept something on a societal level before determining the consequences of doing so. What are the rules? Thats the question that is trying to be raised here and "its not important and we'll figure it out later" is a totally reckless response that would have any normal person alarmed
This is even worse than I expected from the description. Ugh.
Poor production crew. There is no way they are compensated enough for having to endure that madness.
How long till they go bankrupt like the Blaze?
sam zen Hes sucking Koch for money so prolly not for a while.
@@Mortiis558
I mean Owens with Prauger-U I have stopped seeing there ads on youtube for some time.
when the kocks find a better sell out ...
never as long as the Kochs keep paying to spread nonsense.
Yep they are sitting on a bubble.
Well, David, there goes your chances of getting Rubin back on your show XD
Dumb and Dumber, I watched 5 minutes of it before I was forced to induce vomiting.
don't torture yourself that way, my dear. it may seriously affect your health.
an ex of mine was in the cult of Ayn Rand and they all talk like this, its just one big ego circle jerk of dunces.
5:25 "I'm ignorant" -Candace Owens
What a great soundbyte
How often does Candace host speeches in black communities?
@Bryzz Lull The alt right aren't liberals
I mean I know that TPUSA goes to various colleges which are liberal and battle liberal ideas. But I think you have a very good point, I have a feeling Owens wouldn't dare go into a room full of black folks that disagree with her.
@Bryzz Lull lol what ?
She went to an HBCU and the videos I've seen, she kept getting boo'd over and over again.
@Bryzz Lull Do you have anything of Intelligence or of context to add. Rhetorical.
In fairness, the trans sport debate is an important for someone like me. I work in Sport and it’s going to become a reality in our industry very soon. Rightly or wrongly, this DOES need to be discussed
He’s evening stealing Sam Seder’s broadcast style now.. smh
"Pause it!"
I really think people should stop entertaining candace Owen. All black stars should not respond to anything she says. Or try to say what she said is wrong. Just leave her to do her bashing .
Damn that was painful
His point that transgender men->women competing in sports is not a big issue may be right from an abstract level, but it's still an issue and if you have had concrete experience of it then it's going to seem like a much bigger issue to you. That's human nature and pointing to statistics simply isn't going to change that fact
That's why I admit, progressivism is a positive standpoint, conservatism a negative one. By which I mean that if you haven't experienced an issue then it's very easy to be positive about it and be willing to change things 'for the better'. If however you've really experienced an issue in your life, and seen its negative effects, you're much more likely to be conservative regarding it. This is the number one reason people become more conservative as they age, because they've simply accumulated more experience. Only people who sit in their basements pontificating about them online stay progressive, and even they become conservatives compared to the next generation of progressives coming up.
@@zootsoot2006 Lmao imagine thinking "that one WNBA player that was really good is worse than any NBA player. Leftists will disagree with me. Leftists don't like to talk about biological realities" is a good point. He made up an imaginary debate about female basketball that doesn't even matter and literally nobody cares about
@@zootsoot2006 so you are a transgender that had to complete against the opposite gender. I think each case should be concidered.
I love how Dave Rubin is gay but talks about biological realities as if that argument wasn’t used against the lgbt community for a millennia.
That is funny ... perhaps the should chat about the biological realities of him and his husband. Am sure the assholes who write his talking points have plenty of old material they can dust off.
If these "converts" didn't feel the need to show how much of sellout they are, i don't think what they would appear that often on pakmans or progressives radar
@David Packman I understand the whole biological male/transwoman issues isn't “important” from a “widespread issue” standpoint, but it's definitely essential for things like female college sports scholarships and overall professional sports competition as a female.
Imagine the WNBA with a significant number of biological males playing? Put that dynamic into ANY women's sport and it becomes a problem very quickly. I personally have no qualms with men doing it, but then competing professionally or even at an amateur level in physical sports against women would be detrimental.
Think about vice verse...women competing in the NBA...or competing against men in track and field. Sorry, but you just don't see it because there is a particular physical advantage to males that most women cannot overcome.
I'm center right. I come to this channel to get good, unbiased perspective from someone on the left.
Sometimes I think I do, sometimes I think I don't. Regardless, it's amazing how many people will jump on the bandwagon for or against someone without doing a shred of investigation on their own.
Ohey, I'm center left and came here from Sargon. I have a rule that I only follow political youtubers that don't censor comment, which in my experience are much more rare than center or right channels.
The sad thing about Candace is that I'm not sure she came to her opinions on her own. I always get the vibe she is almost reading of a script and when you ask somthing in a way that her script doesnt account for you get really awkward moments.
Lmao being black conservative is another easy way for a big pay check ....
😆
I love that profile picture! lol
I wish I had no scruples.
I've been applying for jobs like crazy here in London. Not much luck. I'm also a socialist. I feel like of I moved to LA and sold out *hard* I could make a fortune and be back in time for brexit. It's sorely tempting.
Your avi lol. I need that
She also erroneously said something made her "nauseous" when she *MEANT* "nauseated". 🤢
Bro, that's kinda cringe...
Episode 1: I promise never to resort to identity politics or to use political labels
Episode 2 - Infinity: (only labels and identity politics)
I saw the short abridged version on PV, cant sit through that whole garbage.
Well there goes David Pakman's invitation to be on the Rubin Report 😄
"You're too smart" so Candace Owens is a comedian now?
This 'interview' is just an hour of Candace and Dave stoking each other ego's tbh
No David, you were right the first time. There's no doubt in my mind that he could convince her that she is a classical *liberalism!*
I start to get a similar kind of sick anytime I try to watch Carlson or Ingram.
Uncle Ruckus, come get your niece 🤣
Damn. Ignorance is making money. I remember when ignorance was looked down upon.
Dude you should have the actual justice warrior on your show
I'd love to see that guy get dunked on
"I was in Alex Jones' show for 10 mins and based on that I'm claiming he is not worth banning." Uggggggghh
The point is that in a free society we need freedom of speech. The Constitution understands this. And are social media publishers or platforms? They claim to be platforms but they are acting like they can govern what people say.
I'm just here to evaluate the damages caused to Sam Seder by your set design. Don't mind me.
She seems like that friend you used to have who was alright and fun enough to be with, but too thick to have any meaningful conversations or debates with
oh man. i really dont understand how you could listen to these people non-ironically and somehow stomach it.
Dennis Prager is getting all of his useful idiots together in one room.
Self-parody is the perfect description for this dog and pony show.
My brain hurts from just their first line of dialogue. It’s like a race to see who can lower the rooms iq the fastest.
I saw David die a little inside
"I've never watched Candice's show." "I watched it for the first time yesterday." "She is a FOE FOE INTELECTUAL", even though I've never watched her show but you watched it for the first time yesterday.
Big Brain shit right here.
"Classical liberalism is very right wing"? Classical liberalism is moderately left wing. The only way you can come to the conclusion that it's very right wing, is if you're so far left everything looks like the right.
There is a difference between the classical definition of Liberalism and "CLassical Liberalism". CLassical Liberalism is what we now call Libertarianism in the US. Some Europeans and Americans use the term Classical Liberal, the americans do it in order to not have any connection or perceived allegiance to the Libertarian Party I assume, IDK. I myself am a Liberal in the traditional american sense but, hates the Democratic party and has little in common with anyone who calls themselves Liberals, or the right would call a "libtard".
I was done the moment she called Dave Rubin a "wealth of knowledge". Like holy shit, that was humiliating😳
Her make up was not on point here. Amazin!
Black Brit you can't fix that mess with all the brands at Sephora and a contour lesson from Kim K herself. Some faces require synthetics, airbrushing, and post editing touchups to even get close to producing a likeable image. No amount of filters or Photoshop can help Candace. Bitch is ugly to the bone
Cringe inducing is the best set of words to describe Candace Owens as of yet.
I was of a similar opinion pertaining to trans women competing against afab (assigned female at birth) people, until I saw the way my wife lost her strength when she started her HRT. This prompted me to look into the actual science, and I found that HRT does make an amab (assigned male at birth) person more similar in physical capacity to afab people than other amab people who are not doing through HRT. Looking further, women's sports that have allowed trans women on HRT to complete, including the Olympics, have not seen trans women dominating them.
That's not all because if they were referring to who I think they were the person they were talking about wasn't amab but actually the opposite. And they actually wanted to wrestle as a male but the school denied them because said school agreed with them about that "biological reality"(Which totally isn't really just race realism but re-framed to include LGBT people as well) shit they were talking about.
@@SOMEGUY7893 I remember that case, but I don't think that's what was being referred to here. As far as I can tell, there is zero even flimsy reason to restrict trans guys to women's competitions.
@@nateslovebug I don't know, them talking about a chokehold and Dave mentioning that he "saw it in the picture"and such makes me think their talking about him. And still repeating the misinformation/lie that they were born male and not the other way around.
@@SOMEGUY7893 It might be that they don't know what a trans man or woman is and are conflating the two. That both would baffle, yet wouldn't surprise me.
I also agree its low hanging fruit to talk about males competing in female sports. Its obviously clear males have an upper hand in the strength department. But with that said, two things. One, certain cities are allowing this (abcnews.go.com/US/transgender-teens-outrun-track-field-competitors-critics-close/story?id=55856294) and so it does raise the questions, "how far can this go? If you pander to this then why not whatever comes next?" I think thats a fair concern. Or the MMA fighter, Fallon Fox, who just brutally destroys women in the octagon. And it is this line of thinking on the left that permits these things to happen. And two, its good to know Pakman agrees with this! I honestly wouldn't know unless he said that so to me its not as clearly obvious as he is stating. But look, thats why I am here... and not in my echo chamber on the right.
“I’m constantly growing and learning.” Lol
Tried watching the interview and couldn't get halfway through, good lord
conservatives say liberals are stupid and ridiculous. liberals say conservatives are stupid and ridiculous. it's a red team vs. blue team mentality. both have views that can be supported. i'm interested in content that addresses ideas rather than name-calling. i check in with david packman evey once in a while hoping to see that, and when i do, i will watch more consistently.
Damn, sophistry is right. Good Lord!
The saddest part is that there are Americans that would vote for Candace to be POTUS.
lol i somehow ended up watching it and i was like jesus this is awful
Eek. Hard to watch for me and I try to stay balanced.....
It was so awful, they made a business out of that sh*t. Can you believe it, they are making money out of it. WTF!
She don't know who she is very sad
I think Pakman's audience should watch the interview themselves. I don't think he wants them to watch it.