Thanks for your engagement. We have transparently disclosed we are short. But we are in the business of providing retail investors and other stakeholders who don't get to 'kick the tyres' with relevant information that will help them in decision making.
@sphudson I don't think N302AX is a tail number. I think it is a model number. When Archer first made the claims of delivering an aircraft to the U.S.A.F and I Google compared (what I thought would be a 2nd aircraft) I noticed both had the same tail number, but found it was a model number, so it I thought that possibly Archer has now 2 Midnight aircraft. From the looks of this video, my skepticism was right and Archer just painted their only Midnight and passed it off as - some newly built aircraft. The white Midnight earlier in the vid has to be the same aircraft and was just in between paint schemes.
This video is BS from someone who admits they have a short position. You are claiming that someone purporting to be from the company reported in July 2023 that the wing had just been delivered and that, quote, "it is not possible to get their first piloted air taxi up in the air this year." Archer have stated on May 9 2024: "Final Assembly..Rapidly Progressing" and "made significant progress on final assembly and integration of the aircraft’s components and systems" and "ON TRACK to begin PILOTED FLIGHT TESTS of this aircraft LATER THIS YEAR". Your alleged social media character is effectively claiming wing, rotors, actuators, lights etc cannot be connected up by this expert team in less than 5 months? This expert team who, up until that point, were progressing rapidly. You are having a laugh. Scaled up with factory staff, Archer will produce 13 aircraft per WEEK from SCRATCH in the new factory. Yet the expert team can't final fit the test craft in less than 5 MONTHS? LOL, ok mate. You are not reporting this as fact. It is rumour (and who would fabricate the social media character I wonder? - if there is one at all). The FACT that you are trying to spread a rumour means you cannot be trusted to report anything truthfully. Your credibility is down the toilet.
Archer tells stakeholders that it has a very good product, the design is very "mature" it is really quiet and it is ramping up the cadence of its test flight program and it is flying hundreds of times, up to 15 flights per day so as to gain experience on what commercial operations will be. If that is true, then Archer has lots of internal data to back it up. Everything in that data set can be shared without jeopardising Archer's intellectual property. So we would say: share the calibrated noise data, share the actual mileage and flight hours flown, share video's of flights including sound, share pictures of the actual assembly of the first three planes. None of that is forthcoming. To put it differently: would you buy a car from a seller who tells you that he is totally confident that his car has 500 miles of range, accelerates to 100 mph in 6 seconds and top speed of 200 mph because that is what he is doing all the time, but who doesn't wan't to show you any material to back up those claims, much less lets you test drive? Meanwhile Archer is selling hundreds of millions of dollars of shares to institutional investors at an attractive discount and is then trying to convince retail investors to buy them without the discount in the public markets. Our goal is to make sure that retail investors have a complete picture. We are not arguing that Archer doesn't have a path to certification and commercialisation because we don't have a definitive opinion on that. What we are trying to do is make sure that stakeholder who invest their money in Archer or stake their reputation on entering into a MOU for some future collaboration have a full picture of the state of play. They deserve that.
They've come further than any evtol company so far in my opinion. I'm invested in several and the others are coming along at different speeds. This industry may be huge soon.
We should hopefully get some news on Archer's testing on November 7th.
Short attack!!!
Thanks for your engagement. We have transparently disclosed we are short. But we are in the business of providing retail investors and other stakeholders who don't get to 'kick the tyres' with relevant information that will help them in decision making.
Why reduce the sound? Isn’t that important to hear? Is there a problem?
The noise is probably faked along with this shorters other false claims.
So Archer literally painted the original Midnight to make it appear to the unsuspecting that this is the aircraft Archer recently built.
@sphudson I don't think N302AX is a tail number. I think it is a model number. When Archer first made the claims of delivering an aircraft to the U.S.A.F and I Google compared (what I thought would be a 2nd aircraft) I noticed both had the same tail number, but found it was a model number, so it I thought that possibly Archer has now 2 Midnight aircraft. From the looks of this video, my skepticism was right and Archer just painted their only Midnight and passed it off as - some newly built aircraft. The white Midnight earlier in the vid has to be the same aircraft and was just in between paint schemes.
@@sphudson as far as being legal, I'm not sure.
Wow. Too loud!
The noise is probably faked along with this shorters other false claims.
This video is BS from someone who admits they have a short position.
You are claiming that someone purporting to be from the company reported in July 2023 that the wing had just been delivered and that, quote, "it is not possible to get their first piloted air taxi up in the air this year."
Archer have stated on May 9 2024: "Final Assembly..Rapidly Progressing" and "made significant progress on final assembly and integration of the aircraft’s components and systems" and "ON TRACK to begin PILOTED FLIGHT TESTS of this aircraft LATER THIS YEAR".
Your alleged social media character is effectively claiming wing, rotors, actuators, lights etc cannot be connected up by this expert team in less than 5 months? This expert team who, up until that point, were progressing rapidly. You are having a laugh. Scaled up with factory staff, Archer will produce 13 aircraft per WEEK from SCRATCH in the new factory. Yet the expert team can't final fit the test craft in less than 5 MONTHS? LOL, ok mate. You are not reporting this as fact. It is rumour (and who would fabricate the social media character I wonder? - if there is one at all). The FACT that you are trying to spread a rumour means you cannot be trusted to report anything truthfully. Your credibility is down the toilet.
Dude. All this page does is sh!t on this company. Total one sided garbage.
Archer tells stakeholders that it has a very good product, the design is very "mature" it is really quiet and it is ramping up the cadence of its test flight program and it is flying hundreds of times, up to 15 flights per day so as to gain experience on what commercial operations will be. If that is true, then Archer has lots of internal data to back it up. Everything in that data set can be shared without jeopardising Archer's intellectual property. So we would say: share the calibrated noise data, share the actual mileage and flight hours flown, share video's of flights including sound, share pictures of the actual assembly of the first three planes. None of that is forthcoming. To put it differently: would you buy a car from a seller who tells you that he is totally confident that his car has 500 miles of range, accelerates to 100 mph in 6 seconds and top speed of 200 mph because that is what he is doing all the time, but who doesn't wan't to show you any material to back up those claims, much less lets you test drive? Meanwhile Archer is selling hundreds of millions of dollars of shares to institutional investors at an attractive discount and is then trying to convince retail investors to buy them without the discount in the public markets. Our goal is to make sure that retail investors have a complete picture. We are not arguing that Archer doesn't have a path to certification and commercialisation because we don't have a definitive opinion on that. What we are trying to do is make sure that stakeholder who invest their money in Archer or stake their reputation on entering into a MOU for some future collaboration have a full picture of the state of play. They deserve that.
They've come further than any evtol company so far in my opinion. I'm invested in several and the others are coming along at different speeds. This industry may be huge soon.
@@EVTOLresearch If they add just 1 more propeller I think it's good to go.