n8n is much more flexible but that comes with a higher learning and testing cost. But expanding your agents is also much easier once you get the hang of it.
Yes I agree, I’ll definitely be using n8n for the more complex agent systems but for simple/intermediate agents relevance ai is a better option in my opinion especially if your a beginner
Just because of how easily relevance ai handles returning and summarising 100 emails, it’s only takes around 10 seconds usually so I assumed n8n would be able to handle it the same. On hindsight I could’ve set up a loop on the n8n agent but I still would’ve taken a lot longer to go through the 100 emails compared to relevance ai
n8n is much more flexible but that comes with a higher learning and testing cost. But expanding your agents is also much easier once you get the hang of it.
Yes I agree, I’ll definitely be using n8n for the more complex agent systems but for simple/intermediate agents relevance ai is a better option in my opinion especially if your a beginner
22:17: Instead of reading 100 emails why not setup a loop to do 1 email at a time? Possible?
Just because of how easily relevance ai handles returning and summarising 100 emails, it’s only takes around 10 seconds usually so I assumed n8n would be able to handle it the same. On hindsight I could’ve set up a loop on the n8n agent but I still would’ve taken a lot longer to go through the 100 emails compared to relevance ai